Wondering about LDS high achievement culture
Posted: September 6th, 2024, 8:45 am
First, I believe there is a very strong vibe in LDS culture to be a high achiever. This is most obvious in the Mountain West / Wasatch Front where we see the collective outcome of high quality communities and high standards of living. But where ever the church is, you will have multiple LDS families who demonstrate high achievement.
Second, I believe a culture of high achievement is good. The pursuit for excellence is a far better course for humanity than alternative pursuits. Societies benefit greatly from people developing and perfecting their talents and putting those talents on display. And while it is true that a high achievement culture invites pride and competition, those negatives prevail in all cultures. You have never known spitefulness until you spend time in a spiritually impoverished area and realize how much another person's success and good fortune is cause for jealousy and anger.
What I am wondering about is what factors created the LDS high achievement culture? To what degree do we credit church teachings? To what degree do we credit church leadership? To what degree do we credit the people who joined the church and brought ideas into the church? And perhaps most importantly, does the church today encourage personal excellence as a doctrine? Or is it the culture of people in the church who promote achievement?
I believe that high achievement used to be an important church teaching - the glory of God is intelligence was a big idea in my youth. In recent years, as wokeness has corrupted all of western culture, the church leadership has adjusted its message in order to appear more inclusive. But the culture of high achievement will continue to be embraced and taught by church member who understand the benefits of that culture - teaching one's children to read and write and think and work and to set high goals is the greatest form of privilege parents can provide and parents SHOULD give their children that gift!
Second, I believe a culture of high achievement is good. The pursuit for excellence is a far better course for humanity than alternative pursuits. Societies benefit greatly from people developing and perfecting their talents and putting those talents on display. And while it is true that a high achievement culture invites pride and competition, those negatives prevail in all cultures. You have never known spitefulness until you spend time in a spiritually impoverished area and realize how much another person's success and good fortune is cause for jealousy and anger.
What I am wondering about is what factors created the LDS high achievement culture? To what degree do we credit church teachings? To what degree do we credit church leadership? To what degree do we credit the people who joined the church and brought ideas into the church? And perhaps most importantly, does the church today encourage personal excellence as a doctrine? Or is it the culture of people in the church who promote achievement?
I believe that high achievement used to be an important church teaching - the glory of God is intelligence was a big idea in my youth. In recent years, as wokeness has corrupted all of western culture, the church leadership has adjusted its message in order to appear more inclusive. But the culture of high achievement will continue to be embraced and taught by church member who understand the benefits of that culture - teaching one's children to read and write and think and work and to set high goals is the greatest form of privilege parents can provide and parents SHOULD give their children that gift!