Page 2 of 2

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 5:28 pm
by Juliet
simpleton wrote: October 1st, 2023, 11:47 am Remarks by Sister Mary E. Lightner who was sealed to Joseph Smith in 1842. She is 87 years of age.]

Well, my young brethren, I can say I never was more surprised in my life than to be called upon to speak to you young men who are called upon to go into the mission field to preach the gospel to the nations of the earth. It is true I have been in the Church from its beginning. Just six months after it was organized, I joined it. I have been acquainted with all of those who were first members of this Church, with all of those who saw the plates and handled them, with even those who saw the angel Moroni who came to them. I am well acquainted with every one of them and I have known them from the time that they came to Ohio until their death; and I am the only living witness who was at the first meeting that the Prophet [Joseph Smith] held in Kirtland.

The Smith family was driven from New York, and a small church had been organized. Oliver Cowdery, Peter Whitmer, and Ziba Peterson were members. Well, I being anxious, though young, to learn about the plates from those who knew all about it, my mother and I went up to the Smith family the next night after they came to Kirtland. As I went in, there were two or three others present. They were all there, from the old gentleman and his wife to all the sons and daughters. As we stood there talking to them, Joseph and Martin Harris came in. Joseph looked around very solemnly. It was the first time some of them had ever seen him.

Said he, "There are enough here to hold a little meeting." They got a board and put it across two chairs to make seats. Martin Harris sat on a little box at Joseph's feet. They sang and prayed. Joseph got up and began to speak to us. As he began to speak very solemnly and very earnestly, all at once his countenance changed and he stood mute. Those who looked at him that day said there was a search light within him, over every part of his body. I never saw anything like it on the earth. I could not take my eyes off him; he got so white that anyone who saw him would have thought he was transparent. I remember I thought I could almost see the cheek bones through the flesh. I have been through many changes since but that is photographed on my brain. I shall remember it and see in my mind's eye as long as I remain upon the earth.

He stood some moments. He looked over the congregation as if to pierce every heart. He said, "Do you know who has been in your midst?" One of the Smiths said an angel of the Lord. Martin Harris said, "It was our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ." Joseph put his hand down on Martin and said: "God revealed that to you. Brethren and sisters, the Spirit of God has been here. The Savior has been in your midst this night and I want you to remember it. There is a veil over your eyes for you could not endure to look upon Him. You must be fed with milk, not with strong meat. I want you to remember this as if it were the last thing that escaped my lips. He has given all of you to me and has sealed you up to everlasting life that where he is, you may be also. And if you are tempted of Satan say, 'Get behind me, Satan.'"

These words are figured upon my brain and I never took my eye off his countenance. Then he knelt down and prayed. I have never heard anything like it before or since. I felt that he was talking to the Lord and that power rested down upon the congregation. Every soul felt it. The spirit rested upon us in every fiber of our bodies, and we received a sermon from the lips of the representative of God.

Much has come and gone from me through the powers and vicissitudes of this Church. I have been in almost every mob. I have been driven about and told I would be shot and had a gun pointed at me, but I stayed with the Church until it was driven from Nauvoo. The words of the Prophet that had been revealed to him always have been with me from the beginning to the end of the gospel. Every principle that has been given in the Church by the prophet is true. I know whereon I stand, I know what I believe, I know what I know and I know what I testify to you is the living truth. As I expect to meet it at the bar of the eternal Jehovah, it is true. And when you stand before the bar you will know. He preached polygamy and he not only preached it, but he practiced it. I am a living witness to it. It was given to him before he gave it to the Church. An angel came to him and the last time he came with a drawn sword in his hand and told Joseph if he did not go into that principle, he would slay him. Joseph said he talked to him soberly about it, and told him it was an abomination and quoted scripture to him. He said in the Book of Mormon it was an abomination in the eyes of the Lord, and they were to adhere to these things except the Lord speak. I am the first being that the revelation [D&C 132] was given to him for and I was one thousand miles away in Missouri, for we went up to Jackson County in 1841 [1831].

I was there in all the tribulations and trials. I have been in the houses that have been stoned. The rocks have been thrown criss-cross in every direction. I have seen the brethren shot and ruined for life. I saw the first martyr dead and a more heavenly corpse I never saw or expect to see on the face of the earth. His face was so happy. I have seen our bishop tarred and feathered in the streets of Missouri. They took off his shirt and covered him with tar and then took a pillow and turned the feathers over him. I looked at him and thought if ever man was counted worthy to be a martyr, he was. His life proved it for he lived an upright and honorable life and was beloved by the prophet while he lived and after he died the prophet honored him. Two of his sisters were Joseph's wives. Emma took them by the hand and gave them to Joseph.

I asked him if Emma knew about me, and he said, "Emma thinks the world of you." I was not sealed to him until I had a witness. I had been dreaming for a number of years I was his wife. I thought I was a great sinner. I prayed to God to take it from me for I felt it was a sin; but when Joseph sent for me he told me all of these things. "Well," said I, "don't you think it was an angel of the devil that told you these things?" Said he, "No, it was an angel of God. God Almighty showed me the difference between an angel of light and Satan's angels. The angel came to me three times between the years of 1834 and 1842 and said I was to obey that principle or he would slay me. "But," said he, "they called me a false and fallen prophet but I am more in favor with my God this day than I ever was in all my life before. I know that I shall be saved in the Kingdom of God. I have the oath of God upon it and God cannot lie; all that he gives me I shall take with me for I have that authority and that power conferred upon me."

Well, I talked with him for a long time and finally I told him I would never be sealed to him until I had a witness. Said he, "You shall have a witness." Said I, "If God told you that, why does he not tell me?" He asked me if I was going to be a traitor. "I have never told a mortal and shall never tell a mortal I had such a talk from a married man," said I. "Well," said he, "pray earnestly for the angel said to me you should have a witness." Well, Brigham Young was with me. He said if I had a witness he wanted to know it. "Why should I tell you?" said I. "Well," said he, "I want to know for myself." Said he, "Do you know what Joseph said? Since we left the office the angel appeared to him and told him he was well pleased with him and that you should have a witness."

I made it a subject of prayer and I worried about it because I did not dare to speak to a living being except Brigham Young. I went out and got between three haystacks where no one could see me. As I knelt down I thought, why not pray as Moses did? He prayed with his hands raised. When his hands were raised, Israel was victorious, but when they were not raised, the Philistines were victorious. I lifted my hands and I have heard Joseph say the angels covered their faces. I knelt down and if ever a poor mortal prayed, I did. A few nights after that an angel of the Lord came to me and if ever a thrill went through a mortal, it went through me. I gazed upon the clothes and figure but the eyes were like lightning. They pierced me from the crown of my head to the soles of my feet. I was frightened almost to death for a moment. I tried to waken my aunt, but I could not. The angel leaned over me and the light was very great, although it was night. When my aunt woke up she said she had seen a figure in white robes pass from our bed to my mother's bed and pass out of the window.

Joseph came up the next Sabbath. He said, "Have you had a witness yet?" "No." "Well," said he, "the angel expressly told me you should have." Said I, "I have not had a witness, but I have seen something I have never seen before. I saw an angel and I was frightened almost to death. I did not speak." He studied a while and put his elbows on his knees and his face in his hands. He looked up and said, "How could you have been such a coward?" Said I, "I was weak." "Did you think to say, `Father, help me?'" "No." "Well, if you had just said that, your mouth would have been opened for that was an angel of the living God. He came to you with more knowledge, intelligence, and light than I have ever dared to reveal." I said, "If that was an angel of light, why did he not speak to me?" "You covered your face and for this reason the angel was insulted." Said I, "Will it ever come again?" He thought a moment and then said, "No, not the same one, but if you are faithful you shall see greater things than that." And then he gave me three signs of what would take place in my own family, although my husband was far away from me at the time. Every work came true. I went forward and was sealed to him. Brigham Young performed the sealing, and Heber C. Kimball the blessing. I know he had six wives and I have known some of them from childhood up. I knew he had three children. They told me. I think two are living today but they are not known as his children as they go by other names.

These are things I can testify to as the living truth, and I have told it to the Josephites. There is a great deal said about this church and the Josephites. I never knew of Joseph appointing him to be the prophet. I have never known him to say it, and I have known the boy ever since he was twelve years of age. I heard Joseph say this: "I have rolled this kingdom off of my shoulders onto the shoulders of the Twelve and they can carry out this work and build up His kingdom." Said he, "I am tired. I have been mobbed, I have suffered so much from outsiders and from my own family. Some of the brethren think they can carry out this work better than I can, far better. I have asked the Lord to take me away. I have to seal my testimony to this generation with my blood. I have to do it for this work will never progress until I am gone for the testimony is of no force until the testator is dead. People little know who I am when they talk about me, and they never will know until they see me weighed in the balance in the Kingdom of God. Then they will know who I am, and see me as I am. I dare not tell them and they do not know me." These words were spoken with such power that they penetrated the heart of every soul that believed on him.

Now about these Josephites--I have not a word to say about Joseph. He is doing a great work in the first principles. He does not believe in endowments; he does not believe in some other things; and he does not recognize this Church as the true church. But we have one criterion to go by. Joseph said, "The servant cannot be greater than the Master. If they persecute me they will persecute you." Has his son Joseph ever been persecuted? Have they been whipped and murdered in cold blood? They can go into the world as members of the re-organized church. They do not believe the right one took Joseph's place.

But let me tell you this gospel is going to spread, and you young men who are going on missions, give your hearts to God, for He said, "Young man, give me thy heart." And if you do give Him your hearts and pray to the heavens above the spirit of God and the Holy Ghost will rest upon you. If the great soul that rules in heaven and on earth, and the inspiration of the spirit comes down and rests in your bosom you will be able to speak the light to the people and you will gain a great reward. Just speaking of yourself in your own strength the spirit is withdrawn. You will have no power that will reach the heart. It may tickle the ear, but you must have the power of the Almighty. You must have the angels to be your companions and rest upon you. Let them be your guide in health and trouble. May you ever drink of the waters of intelligence that flows from the throne of God. God Almighty will guide you and direct you and you will walk in the paths of truth and you will receive your reward as His servants for the good deeds you have done on this earth.

This is my testimony and I hope and pray you will believe me for I have received it from the servant's heart, and when that servant comes he will own his people if they are faithful and humble. A trying hour and darkest hours are in the future before us and it is only those who are humble, contrite and honest before God and endure to the end who shall receive the blessings. Faith will be trampled down and there will be punishments come upon those who are not honest. These are things I tell you and they are true and you will see that they are if you live long enough. All I have said to you about the future will come to pass just as sure as the sun shines in the heavens. May God bless you and let you be on the alert to receive the words of light that are given to you by His servants. You will all be tried by darkness and the powers of darkness will come to you, but put your trust in your Heavenly Father, let Him be your guide and support for He is the everlasting light, worlds without end.

I hope you will excuse me for being a little agitated but it is a terrible tax for me to come and get up to speak. But I want you to remember what I have said, that it is my testimony, as long as you live. I want to say to you as I said before that Joseph said if I was faithful, I should see greater things than the angel. Since then I have seen other persons, three came together and stood before me just as the sun went down -- Joseph, Hyrum and Heber C. Kimball. It was prophesied that I should see Joseph before I died. Still, I was not thinking about that. I was thinking about a sermon I had heard. All at once I looked up and they stood before me. Joseph stood in the middle in a circle like the new moon and he stood with his arms over their shoulders. They bowed to me about a dozen times or more. I pinched myself to be sure I was awake, and I looked around the room to see where I had placed things. I thought I would shake hands with them. They saw my confusion and understood it and they laughed, and I thought Brother Kimball would almost kill himself laughing. I had no fear. As I went to shake hands with them, they bowed, smiled and began to fade. They went like the sun sinks behind a mountain or a cloud. It gave me more courage and hope than I ever had before.

All of these testimonies are coming from women who had nothing to lose and only to gain from marrying Joseph Smith. Find me a testimony of a woman who was wife no. 1 and wanted her husband having sexual intimate relations with another woman. You won't find a testimony like that. (Ok, maybe you can from someone with an inferiority complex). When all these other women won, Emma lost. And I don't appreciate a culture who says that's appropriate.

When Joseph was poor and persecuted, none of these other women loved Joseph like Emma did. Joseph was not a good prospect even for a father-in-law. Emma had to elope because Joseph was not seen by the community as good marriage material. Emma loved him anyway.

When Joseph had influence over tens of thousands of people, then the women show up. It's not hard to have a revelation that your status goes from being a nobody to being the wife of a major influencer because, oh my; it's God's will!

Why is that ok? It's not ok for me, and it's not ok for me to teach that to my daughters; to go ahead and get married and then let other women who are jealous come and marry your husband too. To put guilt on women for even wanting her husband to be faithful to her alone. I think that is cruel and unusual. If I was married to a rich and famous man who decided that he was ready to have other wives, I would divorce him. Maybe some people want to live in a situation like that, but I don't, and I would never marry a man that I felt like would eventually trade me in for a younger model if he had the wealth or fame or status or so forth.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 5:29 pm
by Luke
Robin Hood wrote: October 1st, 2023, 1:25 pm
Nobody wrote: October 1st, 2023, 10:40 am
Luke wrote: October 1st, 2023, 8:55 am Free love, orgies, wife-swapping, etc. are not the same thing as Celestial Plural Marriage governed by its strict laws.
In a quaint village, there stood a once-decrepit tree. Some villagers insisted it held sacred secrets, concealing them beneath layers of glistening leaves and colorful flowers. They adorned the tree, making it appear pure and divine.

As years passed, the facade endured, but the tree’s core continued to decay, its branches weak and hollow. Then, one day, a fierce storm arrived, stripping away the ornaments and exposing the truth hidden within.

The villagers learned that dressing up something corrupt with beauty and ornamentation could never change its true, rotten nature. The tree’s lesson echoed: appearances may deceive, but beneath the surface, the core remains unchanged.
An unfortunate choice for a parable. Hollow trees live longer and are much better equipped to withstand the storms. In fact, decaying heartwood in not detrimental to the tree at all, and has many benefits.
Additionally, such a tree is an incredibly biodiverse resource, providing a rich and stable ecologically important habitat.
That would probably indicate how inspired it was.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 5:30 pm
by Luke
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 2:52 pm All theorizing about how it makes us feel isn't relevant. If God accepts those ordinances then it's valid.
And this is what sums the entire thing up. Your feelings do not matter at all — the truth is what matters.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 5:31 pm
by FrankOne
Erastothenes wrote: October 1st, 2023, 11:04 am
gkearney wrote: October 1st, 2023, 10:58 am
Erastothenes wrote: October 1st, 2023, 10:43 am Yes. The idea of plural marriage is a decrepit and perverted abomination of what is actually an eternal and righteous practice of one man, one woman.
Ok then what happens to people like me? My first wife who I loved and continue to love dearly died in an accident. My current wife, who I also love, saved me from the darkest depression. Are you suggesting that in the next life I will be forced to choose between these two fine women? Such a notion flies in the face of my understanding of a loving God.
Can only a man have two wives? What about a woman? Is she able to have two, three or fifteen husbands? If your situation allows for plural marriage then why cant a woman have that also?
so, gkearney will have to kick one to the curb after this life? hm.

the model of the universe disagrees. One proton , many electrons. or... One sun, many planets in a solar system.

The man is likened unto the sun and the woman, a moon. It's about polarities and the nature of life.

Studying the nature of male/female does give understanding. They are not the same no matter how much the current world teaching promotes otherwise.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:03 pm
by tmac
At this point most people live in a bubble/vacuum, and are so out of touch with the realities of the natural world that they will never see it.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:07 pm
by gkearney
Reluctant Watchman wrote: October 1st, 2023, 4:38 pm
gkearney wrote: October 1st, 2023, 10:58 am
Erastothenes wrote: October 1st, 2023, 10:43 am Yes. The idea of plural marriage is a decrepit and perverted abomination of what is actually an eternal and righteous practice of one man, one woman.
Ok then what happens to people like me? My first wife who I loved and continue to love dearly died in an accident. My current wife, who I also love, saved me from the darkest depression. Are you suggesting that in the next life I will be forced to choose between these two fine women? Such a notion flies in the face of my understanding of a loving God.
And… what if you die and your wife remarries? You’ll get to have a foursome. Polygamy works both ways. One woman, many men.
A possibility I am willing to live with.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:19 pm
by JLHPROF
larsenb wrote: October 1st, 2023, 3:43 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 2:52 pm Silly thread.
When it comes to plural marriage the only question is whether God approved and if it's an eternal principle.
If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy.

All theorizing about how it makes us feel isn't relevant. If God accepts those ordinances then it's valid.

If you choose to reject various scriptures and prophets then you follow a different religion than was restored and your opinion on polygamy falls under an alternate sect, no different than a Methodist, Lutheran, or Catholic.
But the thread elicited the testimonies of Mary Elizabeth Rollins Lightner and Lucy W. Kimbal, which I'd never read before and will go into my archive . . . .
The original post and quotes are of interest. The speculation on why it can/can't work because of feelings isn't.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:20 pm
by LDS Physician
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 2:52 pm Silly thread.
When it comes to plural marriage the only question is whether God approved and if it's an eternal principle.
If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy.

All theorizing about how it makes us feel isn't relevant. If God accepts those ordinances then it's valid.

If you choose to reject various scriptures and prophets then you follow a different religion than was restored and your opinion on polygamy falls under an alternate sect, no different than a Methodist, Lutheran, or Catholic.
How does this gel with D&C 101, 1835 version ... you know, the one which states polygamy is akin to adultery and that monogamy is the way of the church?

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:21 pm
by JLHPROF
Reluctant Watchman wrote: October 1st, 2023, 5:15 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 2:52 pm Silly thread.
When it comes to plural marriage the only question is whether God approved and if it's an eternal principle.
If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy.

All theorizing about how it makes us feel isn't relevant. If God accepts those ordinances then it's valid.

If you choose to reject various scriptures and prophets then you follow a different religion than was restored and your opinion on polygamy falls under an alternate sect, no different than a Methodist, Lutheran, or Catholic.
132 is its own ball of strings to untangle. Polygamy does not hinge on 132.
True.
But I also fully accept 132.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:22 pm
by JLHPROF
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:20 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 2:52 pm Silly thread.
When it comes to plural marriage the only question is whether God approved and if it's an eternal principle.
If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy.

All theorizing about how it makes us feel isn't relevant. If God accepts those ordinances then it's valid.

If you choose to reject various scriptures and prophets then you follow a different religion than was restored and your opinion on polygamy falls under an alternate sect, no different than a Methodist, Lutheran, or Catholic.
How does this gel with D&C 101, 1835 version ... you know, the one which states polygamy is akin to adultery and that monogamy is the way of the church?
Doesn't have to. That 101 "revelation" has zero divine provenance and is entirely the work of men. It's an organizational policy statement and was rightly removed. I'll take the word of the Lord in 132.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:24 pm
by Reluctant Watchman
^^^ I’m out. I’ll leave you guys with this: https://www.reluctantwatchman.com/polygamy-adultery

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:33 pm
by LDS Physician
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:22 pm
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:20 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 2:52 pm Silly thread.
When it comes to plural marriage the only question is whether God approved and if it's an eternal principle.
If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy.

All theorizing about how it makes us feel isn't relevant. If God accepts those ordinances then it's valid.

If you choose to reject various scriptures and prophets then you follow a different religion than was restored and your opinion on polygamy falls under an alternate sect, no different than a Methodist, Lutheran, or Catholic.
How does this gel with D&C 101, 1835 version ... you know, the one which states polygamy is akin to adultery and that monogamy is the way of the church?
Doesn't have to. That 101 "revelation" has zero divine provenance and is entirely the work of men. It's an organizational policy statement and was rightly removed. I'll take the word of the Lord in 132.
Coming from the guy who literally just posted

"If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy."

So

"if you reject D&C 101 and those that believed in then you accept polygamy.
if you accept D&C 101 then you reject polygamy."

Got it, thanks!

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:33 pm
by ransomme
Erastothenes wrote: October 1st, 2023, 11:04 am
gkearney wrote: October 1st, 2023, 10:58 am
Erastothenes wrote: October 1st, 2023, 10:43 am Yes. The idea of plural marriage is a decrepit and perverted abomination of what is actually an eternal and righteous practice of one man, one woman.
Ok then what happens to people like me? My first wife who I loved and continue to love dearly died in an accident. My current wife, who I also love, saved me from the darkest depression. Are you suggesting that in the next life I will be forced to choose between these two fine women? Such a notion flies in the face of my understanding of a loving God.
Can only a man have two wives? What about a woman? Is she able to have two, three or fifteen husbands? If your situation allows for plural marriage then why cant a woman have that also?
Nah women are not equal to men, they are a lower creation, obviously. It takes like at least 10 virgins to equal one man

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:35 pm
by JLHPROF
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:33 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:22 pm
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:20 pm

How does this gel with D&C 101, 1835 version ... you know, the one which states polygamy is akin to adultery and that monogamy is the way of the church?
Doesn't have to. That 101 "revelation" has zero divine provenance and is entirely the work of men. It's an organizational policy statement and was rightly removed. I'll take the word of the Lord in 132.
Coming from the guy who literally just posted

"If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy."

So

"if you reject D&C 101 and those that believed in then you accept polygamy.
if you accept D&C 101 then you reject polygamy."

Got it, thanks!
Correct.
I accept the scriptures as presently constituted.
I am not a member of whatever religion is dominant on this board that got stuck in the Kirtland era.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 6:56 pm
by LDS Physician
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:35 pm
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:33 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:22 pm
Doesn't have to. That 101 "revelation" has zero divine provenance and is entirely the work of men. It's an organizational policy statement and was rightly removed. I'll take the word of the Lord in 132.
Coming from the guy who literally just posted

"If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy."

So

"if you reject D&C 101 and those that believed in then you accept polygamy.
if you accept D&C 101 then you reject polygamy."

Got it, thanks!
Correct.
I accept the scriptures as presently constituted.
I am not a member of whatever religion is dominant on this board that got stuck in the Kirtland era.
Nothing like being stuck back then, right? I mean ... silly Emma ... testified 4 separate times during the 35 years after her husband's murder that he never had any other wife but her. Have to discard EMMA's testimony (as well as Joseph's himself) while accepting women 30 years+ later saying the opposite.

I'll go with everything Joseph and Emma ever said and wrote rather than the others, thanks.

And all those pesky contemporary sealing records that we have of Joseph being sealed to other women. lol. You can't make this stuff up. Actually, you can ... and they did.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 7:31 pm
by ransomme
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:22 pm
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:20 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 2:52 pm Silly thread.
When it comes to plural marriage the only question is whether God approved and if it's an eternal principle.
If you reject D&C 132 and those that believed it then you reject polygamy.
If you accept D&C 132 then you accept polygamy.

All theorizing about how it makes us feel isn't relevant. If God accepts those ordinances then it's valid.

If you choose to reject various scriptures and prophets then you follow a different religion than was restored and your opinion on polygamy falls under an alternate sect, no different than a Methodist, Lutheran, or Catholic.
How does this gel with D&C 101, 1835 version ... you know, the one which states polygamy is akin to adultery and that monogamy is the way of the church?
Doesn't have to. That 101 "revelation" has zero divine provenance and is entirely the work of men. It's an organizational policy statement and was rightly removed. I'll take the word of the Lord in 132.
132 is a fabrication. So many different reports of length, and many impossible contradictions in its origin story. Take, for instance, that supposedly Hyrum asked for a copy because he could convince Emma of its truthfulness because it was so damn beautiful. Yet by the time this supposedly happened, Emma had already participated in at least two of the supposed polygamous sealings. LOL, none of the timelines match up, because it's all a fabricated mess. There are so many obvious problems with 132 it's silly. William Clayton was a teller of tall tales, that were written after the fact. At the very best they were doctored copies of copies, "fair and clean" final drafts.
132 change 01.JPG
132 change 01.JPG (78.78 KiB) Viewed 142 times
It's interesting how much BY and Co. used (and I mean used) Joseph to justify their polygamy, and how much they loathed Hyrum. Hyrum was the second president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, not Brigham Young. But Brigham feared the memory of Hyrum.

Here are some of Hyrum's final words on polygamy before he and Joseph sealed their testimonies in blood.
HS 01.JPG
HS 01.JPG (81.08 KiB) Viewed 142 times

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 7:33 pm
by larsenb
Bronco73idi wrote: October 1st, 2023, 4:35 pm
larsenb wrote: October 1st, 2023, 3:45 pm
Bronco73idi wrote: October 1st, 2023, 12:12 pm


“Pass on still further in their history, and look at their course and conduct, if you will believe the writers that lived in that age. What does old Celsus say, who was a physician in the first century, whose medical works are esteemed very highly at the present time. His works on theology were burned with fire by the Catholics, they were so shocked at what they called their impiety. Celsus was a heathen philosopher; and what does he say upon the subject of Christ and his Apostles, and their belief? He says, “The grand reason why the Gentiles and philosophers of his school persecuted Jesus Christ, was, because he had so many wives; there were Elizabeth, and Mary, and a host of others that followed him.” After Jesus went from the stage of action, the Apostles followed the example of their master. For instance, John the beloved disciple, writes in his second Epistle, “Unto the elect lady and her children, whom I love in the truth.” Again, he says, “Having many things to write unto you (or communicate), I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face, that our joy may be full.” Again—“The children of thy elect sister greet thee.” This ancient philosopher says they were both John's wives. Paul says, “Mine answer to them that do examine me is this ...
Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas.” He, according to Celsus, had a numerous train of wives.
The grand reason of the burst of public sentiment in anathemas upon Christ and his disciples, causing his crucifixion, was evidently based upon polygamy, according to the testimony of the philosophers who rose in that age. A belief in the doctrine of a plurality of wives caused the persecution of Jesus and his followers. We might almost think they were “Mormons.””
Can you supply a source for this? Thanks.
https://jod.mrm.org/1/341

Page 345
Thanks! Especially interesting to me because of his topic: Uniformity. This was a big issue at the time, and thoroughly subscribed to by the geologists (my background) of the day; not so much anymore. Grant even delves into how geologic and natural processes are not uniform. A man ahead of his time.

And his quotes from Celsus, appear to be direct quotes, so we can believe that Jedediah Grant had Celsus' writings to refer to. This is definitely worth corroborating and researching. I've never heard of this claim, that Jesus and certain of his disciples had polygamous wives. My, my. Surprise, surprise.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 7:57 pm
by LDS Physician
ransomme wrote: October 1st, 2023, 7:31 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:22 pm
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:20 pm

How does this gel with D&C 101, 1835 version ... you know, the one which states polygamy is akin to adultery and that monogamy is the way of the church?
Doesn't have to. That 101 "revelation" has zero divine provenance and is entirely the work of men. It's an organizational policy statement and was rightly removed. I'll take the word of the Lord in 132.
132 is a fabrication. So many different reports of length, and many impossible contradictions in its origin story. Take, for instance, that supposedly Hyrum asked for a copy because he could convince Emma of its truthfulness because it was so damn beautiful. Yet by the time this supposedly happened, Emma had already participated in at least two of the supposed polygamous sealings. LOL, none of the timelines match up, because it's all a fabricated mess. There are so many obvious problems with 132 it's silly. William Clayton was a teller of tall tales, that were written after the fact. At the very best they were doctored copies of copies, "fair and clean" final drafts.
132 change 01.JPG

It's interesting how much BY and Co. used (and I mean used) Joseph to justify their polygamy, and how much they loathed Hyrum. Hyrum was the second president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, not Brigham Young. But Brigham feared the memory of Hyrum.

Here are some of Hyrum's final words on polygamy before he and Joseph sealed their testimonies in blood.
HS 01.JPG
Ya, but ransomme they practiced polygamy secretly while denouncing it publicly. Get with the program.

Haven't you seen everything Joseph and Hyrum wrote and spoke prior to their deaths regarding polygamy?

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 1st, 2023, 8:27 pm
by Baurak Ale
larsenb wrote: October 1st, 2023, 7:33 pm
Bronco73idi wrote: October 1st, 2023, 4:35 pm
larsenb wrote: October 1st, 2023, 3:45 pm
Can you supply a source for this? Thanks.
https://jod.mrm.org/1/341

Page 345
Thanks! Especially interesting to me because of his topic: Uniformity. This was a big issue at the time, and thoroughly subscribed to by the geologists (my background) of the day; not so much anymore. Grant even delves into how geologic and natural processes are not uniform. A man ahead of his time.

And his quotes from Celsus, appear to be direct quotes, so we can believe that Jedediah Grant had Celsus' writings to refer to. This is definitely worth corroborating and researching. I've never heard of this claim, that Jesus and certain of his disciples had polygamous wives. My, my. Surprise, surprise.
There’s even some textual evidence in the New Testament to support those quotes—more here: https://theology.science.blog/2023/01/2 ... s-of-1844/

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 2nd, 2023, 1:39 am
by ransomme
LDS Physician wrote: October 1st, 2023, 7:57 pm
ransomme wrote: October 1st, 2023, 7:31 pm
JLHPROF wrote: October 1st, 2023, 6:22 pm
Doesn't have to. That 101 "revelation" has zero divine provenance and is entirely the work of men. It's an organizational policy statement and was rightly removed. I'll take the word of the Lord in 132.
132 is a fabrication. So many different reports of length, and many impossible contradictions in its origin story. Take, for instance, that supposedly Hyrum asked for a copy because he could convince Emma of its truthfulness because it was so damn beautiful. Yet by the time this supposedly happened, Emma had already participated in at least two of the supposed polygamous sealings. LOL, none of the timelines match up, because it's all a fabricated mess. There are so many obvious problems with 132 it's silly. William Clayton was a teller of tall tales, that were written after the fact. At the very best they were doctored copies of copies, "fair and clean" final drafts.
132 change 01.JPG

It's interesting how much BY and Co. used (and I mean used) Joseph to justify their polygamy, and how much they loathed Hyrum. Hyrum was the second president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, not Brigham Young. But Brigham feared the memory of Hyrum.

Here are some of Hyrum's final words on polygamy before he and Joseph sealed their testimonies in blood.
HS 01.JPG
Ya, but ransomme they practiced polygamy secretly while denouncing it publicly. Get with the program.

Haven't you seen everything Joseph and Hyrum wrote and spoke prior to their deaths regarding polygamy?
Yep, including did some, up to 60 years after their murder.

I guess they spoke from the grave.

Re: A parable: Celestial Plural Marriage

Posted: October 2nd, 2023, 10:32 am
by Bronco73idi
larsenb wrote: October 1st, 2023, 7:33 pm
Bronco73idi wrote: October 1st, 2023, 4:35 pm
larsenb wrote: October 1st, 2023, 3:45 pm
Can you supply a source for this? Thanks.
https://jod.mrm.org/1/341

Page 345
Thanks! Especially interesting to me because of his topic: Uniformity. This was a big issue at the time, and thoroughly subscribed to by the geologists (my background) of the day; not so much anymore. Grant even delves into how geologic and natural processes are not uniform. A man ahead of his time.

And his quotes from Celsus, appear to be direct quotes, so we can believe that Jedediah Grant had Celsus' writings to refer to. This is definitely worth corroborating and researching. I've never heard of this claim, that Jesus and certain of his disciples had polygamous wives. My, my. Surprise, surprise.
The part that makes me believe they have Celsus treaty “The True Word” is how Jedediah starts his discussion about it. “What does old Celsus say” he says it like the audience has read it.

Something most people miss in the New Testament is something that should be obvious. Jesus stepdad Jospeh had another wife and children before he took Mary in. As Christians we want to paint a young Jospeh and Mary. In Mark 16:1 “Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome” Jesus’s wife and second mother.

No one would visit his sepulchre in fear of being associated with him and thus persecuted. No one is going to persecute his wife and stepmom.