Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Discuss political news items / current events.
Post Reply
User avatar
Col. Flagg
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 16961
Location: Utah County

Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by Col. Flagg »

My brother called me this evening from Phoenix, AZ during the tea party down there and said he had heard an hour earlier on the radio that the supreme court (one of the judges specifically) plans to hear the case involving Obama's eligibility to be president. However, I haven't seen or heard anything yet. Anyone hear anything about this?

User avatar
LukeAir2008
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2985
Location: Highland

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by LukeAir2008 »

:?:
Last edited by LukeAir2008 on April 22nd, 2009, 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ldsff
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1924

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by ldsff »

Can you asked your brother which radio station?

User avatar
Col. Flagg
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 16961
Location: Utah County

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by Col. Flagg »

LukeAir2008 wrote:
Col. Flagg wrote:My brother called me this evening from Phoenix, AZ during the tea party down there and said he had heard an hour earlier on the radio that the supreme court (one of the judges specifically) plans to hear the case involving Obama's eligibility to be president. However, I haven't seen or heard anything yet. Anyone hear anything about this?
That would a fantastic breakthrough. I don't think it would happen without the blessing of the PTB. It would be the perfect catalyst to bring in total chaos.

It would most certainly cause rioting in major U.S. cities, especially among the black population... cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, Philly and New York would be on the brink.

Pres. Obama disqualified because he is actually a Kenyan! There would be a tidal wave of support to have the Constitution amended or maybe totally discarded to allow Mr. Soetoro to keep his job! :o

Obama is not eligible to be in the White House... his grandmother confirmed she was present at his birth in Kenya and his mother was too young at the time of his birth to transcend U.S. citizenship (she had not been a U.S. citizen for the required 6 years). IMO, one of the most trusted men in politics is Alan Keyes and he says Obama is constitutionally ineligible. All Obama has to do is produce a legitimate birth certificate, but he has consistently refused to do so by fighting every challenge with his legal team. If this issue erupts, look out.

User avatar
Col. Flagg
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 16961
Location: Utah County

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by Col. Flagg »

ldsff wrote:Can you asked your brother which radio station?
I'll e-mail him and ask.

User avatar
ldsff
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1924

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by ldsff »

Col. Flagg wrote:
ldsff wrote:Can you asked your brother which radio station?
I'll e-mail him and ask.

I am thinking we can go the radio station website and see if they have posted the story.

User avatar
Col. Flagg
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 16961
Location: Utah County

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by Col. Flagg »

I was talking with a friend this morning and she informed me of something that I was not aware of... Obama's mother being American. I thought she had migrated here at a time when Obama was born before she had been a citizen for at least 6 years (which I was informed is also not a constitutional stipulation)? If Obama's mother was American, this should automatically qualify him as being eligible constitutionally, right? If so, how and why are there so many cases challenging his constitutional eligibility? If it's the dual citizenship thing, apparently, you can be president with dual citizenship. I need to read exactly what the constitution says about this. It just seems odd to me that there are so many challenges to his constitutional eligibility right now nationwide if there is no leg for them all to stand on :?:

User avatar
preparednesspro
captain of 100
Posts: 172
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by preparednesspro »

Supreme Court Judge Roberts has agreed to hear it.
Press Release from Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ01.07.09.
Good news,
Chief Justice John Roberts agreed to hear my case Lightfoot v Bowen, challenging eligibility for presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. He distributed the case to the full conference of the Supreme Court. The timing of this decision by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, is absolutely remarkable. On January 7, one day before the January 8 vote by Congress and Senate, whether to approve or object to the electoral vote of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, as president of the United States, Chief Justice Roberts is sending a message to them, telling them to Hold on, not so fast, there is value in this case, read it. Hawaiian statue 338 allows Foreign Born children of Hawaiian Residents to obtain Hawaiian Birth Certificates, it allows one to get Hawaiian Certification of Life birth based on a statement of one relative only, without any corroborating evidence. You need to investigate, you need corroborating evidence. If only one Congressman or one Senator presents a written objection, then there has to be a formal investigation by the joint session of Congress and Senate. During this investigation original birth certificate from Hawaii will be subpoenaed. All other pertinent documents will be subpoenaed: Obama's immigration records, any and all passports from Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain; University enrollment records, showing if he was enrolled in US schools and universities and received financial aid as a foreign exchange student from Indonesia or Kenya. All of it can be subpoenaed and obtained within a day or two. Each and every member of US Congress and Senate owes it to 320 million American citizens to do his due diligence and demand all necessary records. When American servicemen are told to risk their lives defending Constitution of this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic, each and every Congressman and each and every Senator can spend a day or two of their time defending this Constitution, reviewing necessary documents, in order to see if Barack Hussein Obama is a Natural Born Citizen, if he is a citizen at all. This is the message that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is sending to them, and if they are not listening, there has to be a massive petition drive to recall them. Truth will come out, no matter how many millions Obama is spending to hide it.

Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ
drorly.blogspot.com
[email protected]
http://www.uslaw.com/library/Obama_Citi ... tem=342486

natasha
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2184

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by natasha »

Just one minor correction here that might have some bearing. Kenya was British at the time of Obama's birth...got it's independence in 1963.

User avatar
ldsff
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1924

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by ldsff »

Thanks for the source preparednesspro.


What would happen if Obama is not a natural born citizen? Do you think John Roberts has the balls to bring actual proof of fraud to light?

User avatar
preparednesspro
captain of 100
Posts: 172
Location: Orem, UT
Contact:

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by preparednesspro »

ldsff, I'm not sure it's just Roberts' job. Right now, the Supreme Court has a left majority, with one leftist that sways occasionally (Kennedy).

If it was determined Obama wasn't a natural born US citizen, it would negate everything he ever signed off on. He would also likely be criminally charged.

User avatar
2BFree
captain of 100
Posts: 762

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by 2BFree »

If it's the dual citizenship thing, apparently, you can be president with dual citizenship. I need to read exactly what the constitution says about this. It just seems odd to me that there are so many challenges to his constitutional eligibility right now nationwide if there is no leg for them all to stand on
The reference to eligibility for Prez is found in Article 2 Sec. 1 of the Constitution where it states:
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
There are apparently three stipulations for a person to be eligible for the office. First, he/she is REQUIRED to be "Natural Born", Second, he/she is required to be a "Citizen" and third, he/she is required to be over the age of 35 years of age. The term "Natural Born Citizen" is derived from Vattel's Law of Nations where he states "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens." This was the original intent of the phrase found in the Constitution and the definition the founders understood and relied upon. By this definition a dual citizen can not be President. BHO by his own admission has declared himself a dual citizen. What's ironic is he signed on as a co-sponsor of a Senate declaration and voted in the affirmative that McCain should be declared a NBC so he totally knew and knows that he is NOT a NBC.

User avatar
2BFree
captain of 100
Posts: 762

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by 2BFree »

Oops ... there is also a stipulation in the eligibility clause that the candidate be a resident of the country for 14 years. So, BHO passes 3 of the 4 but that's not good enough. Are we to let something like this just slip by and not force our "elected" servants to adhere to the "supreme law of the land"? This is SO basic and we just let them slip this right by us. WND is following this quite closely and has some good articles on their site if you want to know more.

User avatar
Col. Flagg
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 16961
Location: Utah County

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by Col. Flagg »

threepercentite wrote:they will just rule that the Constitution is unconstitutional.
:lol: Unfortunately though, it's no laughing matter.

User avatar
Col. Flagg
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 16961
Location: Utah County

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by Col. Flagg »

2BFree wrote:Oops ... there is also a stipulation in the eligibility clause that the candidate be a resident of the country for 14 years. So, BHO passes 3 of the 4 but that's not good enough. Are we to let something like this just slip by and not force our "elected" servants to adhere to the "supreme law of the land"? This is SO basic and we just let them slip this right by us. WND is following this quite closely and has some good articles on their site if you want to know more.
Yeah, WorldNetDaily seems to be the champion of Obama's eligibility issue right now.

OK, here is exactly what Article 2 Section 1 states regarding being eligible to be president...
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
This is all it says about what is required to serve as president. However, in my research, I discovered that the term "natural born Citizen" has never been defined by the courts in the course of a presidential qualification challenge. Then I found that the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides an additional source of constitutional doctrine stating that birth "in the United States" and subjection to U.S. jurisdiction at the time of birth, entitles one to citizenship:

“ All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside".

By this, it would seem that McCain was actually the one ineligible to serve as president since he was born in Panama, while Obama may have been born in Hawaii (although his own Grandmother claims she was at his birth in Kenya). This whole eligibility issue just becomes more and more disconcerting by the day.

IMO, 'naturally-born' means born INSIDE THE UNITED STATES. Why? I'm sure the Founding Fathers had to know that there would be issues about children born of U.S. citizens outside the country, having one parent being a citizen and the other not, etc., but there is no mention of any of this in the Constitution or the 14th amendment. Thoughts?

User avatar
2BFree
captain of 100
Posts: 762

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by 2BFree »

By this, it would seem that McCain was actually the one ineligible to serve as president since he was born in Panama, while Obama may have been born in Hawaii (although his own Grandmother claims she was at his birth in Kenya). This whole eligibility issue just becomes more and more disconcerting by the day.
Yes this is very disconcerting because if our Congress and citizens will disregard such a basic provision in the Constitution this is the end of it. We are no longer a Constitutional republic and are ruled by the mob rather than the law.

Obama was a Constitutional Law professor and taught this to soon to be lawyers. He KNOWS he's not eligible and he and his handlers continued to perpetuate the fraud on the people. No wonder he is moving forward with the globalist agenda since it was they who put him where he is and he can be taken out when ever he decides to get out of line.

BTW the 14th amendment has nothing to do with being a "Natural Born Citizen". This amendment created a new class of citizen that of a US Citizen. It was to provide those disenfranchised people left without citizenship after the war between the states. This is where the term "civil rights" sprang from since the Federal Government created these citizens and granted them with "civil rights" as if it could do that. All the other state citizens were acknowledged to have "unalienable" right given to them from God. Now when you're asked,"Are you a US Citizen?" How do you respond?

A couple more points to muddy the waters further, citizenship is granted to offspring through the parents, particularly through the father. It really doesn't matter if Obama was born in Hawaii, which is doubtful, or in Kenya. What matters is where his FATHER was born. Since Obama claims his father was born in Kenya which at the time of Obama's birth was still a British colony and his father was a British subject then that status was passed on to his son. It is also problematic about his mother's status she being only 18 years of age and at that time could not pass on her citizenship status to her son due to statutory disqualification. But then we find out that the marriage between Obama Sr. and his wife was also not legal and lawful due to the fact that he was already married to a woman in Kenya and polygamy was outlawed in the states by that time as we LDS are well aware. Another crazy twist in all of this is his adoption by Mr. Lolo Soetoro and his time he spend in Indonesia being raised as a good little Muslim. So what this all comes down to is that our dumbed down electorate voted in a non-resident alien or should I say and illegal alien to live in government housing and live of the governmant dole while "ruling" over us. The LDGR and elites are have a great laugh.

HeirofNumenor
the Heir Of Numenor
Posts: 4229
Location: UT

Re: Supreme Court to take up Obama eligibility case?

Post by HeirofNumenor »

Oops ... there is also a stipulation in the eligibility clause that the candidate be a resident of the country for 14 years.
Actually, this particular requirement was only for those living at the time the Constitution was adopted. Now you must be a natural born citizen and over 35 years old.

Post Reply