Page 1 of 1
Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 18th, 2023, 2:10 pm
by tmac
What will be the ultimate result(s) of a declining population?
https://www.popularmechanics.com/scienc ... -shortage/
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 18th, 2023, 2:16 pm
by Niemand
Automation is the elephant in the room that no one talks about.
There are definitely some quarters of the world which are overpopulated, but as many which have barely a soul in them. Asia has the two extremes. The vast wastes of Siberia and the Arabian desert vs India and China.
Every continent has a significant portion which barely anyone lives in. The Amazon basin in South America, and Patagonia. The northern half of Alaska and Canada. The top of Scotland, the interior of Iceland and northern Scandinavia. Most of Australia. The deep Sahara which takes much of Africa and the Kalahari. Most of Australia.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 18th, 2023, 2:33 pm
by Fred
Certainly, the globalist elite view that the world is over populated is wrong.
Heavy consumers will find it difficult to consume if no one is available to create the consumables.
The current average age in the USA is about 39 years. Over a third of our population is over 50. The decline in births along with the elite's plans of depopulation, will make the remaining few more manageable by the elites.
Our current advantages of being armed and outnumbering them is in danger. Many of our young people are too stupid to be considered human. Some are even unable to determine their own gender.
The elite could be pretty proud of themselves, except that God has a different idea about how things ought to be.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 18th, 2023, 6:07 pm
by creator
tmac wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 2:10 pm
What will be the ultimate result(s) of a declining population?
Less people.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 18th, 2023, 6:12 pm
by endlessQuestions
Demographics determine destiny.
Perhaps it means there are no more spirit children to send to Earth for a mortal probation, and things are winding up.
Perhaps it means the "vaccines" are "working".
Perhaps people are just stressed out and are less inclined to engage in activities that result in babies being born.
<shrug>
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 18th, 2023, 6:30 pm
by Original_Intent
creator wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 6:07 pm
tmac wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 2:10 pm
What will be the ultimate result(s) of a declining population?
Less people.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
It's rare when I type LOL that I literally LOL'd. This was one of those times.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 18th, 2023, 8:39 pm
by Rumpelstiltskin
What does the global population drop mean? It means that too many people believed the government lies and got the poison clot shot.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 2:20 am
by Niemand
Rumpelstiltskin wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 8:39 pm
What does the global population drop mean? It means that too many people believed the government lies and got the poison clot shot.
More to do with China's one child policy (now abolished).
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 3:28 am
by WikiUp
To me, population growth is inverse to social stability.
The USA was a more stable society when the population was half what it is now. 1950's vs now.
As population increased, .life became more centralizied, standardized and urbanized with the resultant crowding, pollution, consumerism and rat race keeping-up=with=Jones' life style.
As cities became larger, crime increased and cities declined.
For me, life was so much more enjoyable in the 50's and 60's than now with double the population on the land and all of the social problems..
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 5:01 am
by simpleton
And Gideon had threescore and ten sons of his body begotten: for he had many wives.
Let's see, seventy sons, (not counting daughters) just from Gideon, whom God called and honored and with a measly three hundred men wiped out the powerful Midianites and their kings, (a hundred and thirty five thousand plus standing army).
So, if Gideon had those seventy sons, I would venture to guess he had what, maybe at least that many daughters?
That would resolve your population problem pretty quick. But hell no, we would rather our women keep their figures that we can continue to lust after them, by providing them with "the pill" and many other demonic devices, plus us men get ourselves snipped.
Notice that the richer, and educated the society, the less children they have.
Sorry, but God is all about "multiplying and replenishing the earth", but we in America, and even in Mormondom, are all about the butchery of our offspring.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 5:58 am
by Niemand
People tend to breed less when they have more wealth. Seems contradictory, but provable.
Infertility and promiscuity are also factors.
WikiUp wrote: ↑March 19th, 2023, 3:28 am
To me, population growth is inverse to social stability.
The USA was a more stable society when the population was half what it is now. 1950's vs now.
As population increased, .life became more centralizied, standardized and urbanized with the resultant crowding, pollution, consumerism and rat race keeping-up=with=Jones' life style.
As cities became larger, crime increased and cities declined.
For me, life was so much more enjoyable in the 50's and 60's than now with double the population on the land and all of the social problems..
The USA is only a fraction of the world population, and always has been. It has a significant population, but is dwarfed by the populations of India and China, and all the rest.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 6:12 am
by ransomme
How serendipitous? My wife and I the other night were conversing in bed (sometimes wonder what other peoples' pillow talk is like LOL) and population decline, even collapse, came up. A decline could be absorbed by automation but in a collapse, too much knowledge and societal cohesion will be lost.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 8:18 am
by Jashon
Not sure I understand. I've never seen an analysis of population that doesn't have it going up at a non-negligible rate.
Wow, that's a lot of negatives.
In other words, every current, real-time view of population change that I've seen has it going up at a noticeable, non-negligible rate, more than 150k per day, more than 60m per year.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 9:03 am
by OldGlory
creator wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 6:07 pm
tmac wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 2:10 pm
What will be the ultimate result(s) of a declining population?
Less people.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
I read a book about 5 years ago by Mark Stein that talked about the major decline in population in 1st world countries. Mostly due to abortions and people only having one or two kids. Some of your middle eastern countries though continue to have lots of children. The premise was the countries with the most children will ultimately rule the world. Now that I’ve discovered everything we’ve been taught is a lie and our reasons for war are a HUGE lie, I don’t think of them as our enemy, but used and abused by our government. We have also been highly abused by our government with our food, water, and air to name a few. All which reduces population. And of course the hoax of vaccines. Satan’s plan.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 10:20 am
by tmac
Setting aside the vax and all that good stuff one of the fundamental takeaways in the whole equation is that the more stuff (money, etc.) people get, the more they want of just about everything but children. The more they get and the more they have, the less children they want. The most prosperous, highly developed counties, with the highest standards of living are now the ones with the lowest birthrates. They have become so consumption oriented that not only do they not want to share with people in third world countries, they don’t even want to have share with their own children and grandchildren.
Among other things, it says a lot about so-called “prosperity.”
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 11:02 am
by Niemand
tmac wrote: ↑March 19th, 2023, 10:20 am
Setting aside the vax and all that good stuff one of the fundamental takeaways in the whole equation is that the more stuff (money, etc.) people get, the more they want of just about everything but children. The more they get and the more they have, the less children they want. The most prosperous, highly developed counties, with the highest standards of living are now the ones with the lowest birthrates. They have become so consumption oriented that not only do they not want to share with people in third world countries, they don’t even want to have share with their own children and grandchildren.
Among other things, it says a lot about so-called “prosperity.”
It's not just consumption orientated, in poor countries people have a lot of children so that they are looked after when they're old... and more importantly, they lose so many children they have to have more to compensate.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 11:11 am
by tmac
So, prosperous, selfish consumption-orientation isn’t actually much of a factor?
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 2:36 pm
by Silver Pie
endlessQuestions wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 6:12 pm
Demographics determine destiny.
Perhaps it means there are no more spirit children to send to Earth for a mortal probation, and things are winding up.
Perhaps it means the "vaccines" are "working".
Perhaps people are just stressed out and are less inclined to engage in activities that result in babies being born.
<shrug>
Another one:
And there are so many people either pretending to be the opposite sex, or brainwashed into it, that it will be impossible for them to ever reproduce.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 19th, 2023, 2:56 pm
by Niemand
Silver Pie wrote: ↑March 19th, 2023, 2:36 pm
endlessQuestions wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 6:12 pm
Demographics determine destiny.
Perhaps it means there are no more spirit children to send to Earth for a mortal probation, and things are winding up.
Perhaps it means the "vaccines" are "working".
Perhaps people are just stressed out and are less inclined to engage in activities that result in babies being born.
<shrug>
Another one:
And there are so many people either pretending to be the opposite sex, or brainwashed into it, that it will be impossible for them to ever reproduce.
That is perhaps one aim of that. Make castration cool. It's difficult to sell it otherwise. A scheme to give Indians radios in return for vasectomies didn't take off.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 20th, 2023, 7:58 am
by tmac
The modern, developed world is a less and less family-friendly environment.
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/19/11633416 ... ility-rate
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 20th, 2023, 8:45 am
by Vision
Fred wrote: ↑March 18th, 2023, 2:33 pm Some are even unable to determine their own gender.
HAHAHAHAHAHA...............................................
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 20th, 2023, 9:13 am
by Thinker
Call me Skeptical, but I don’t trust “research” from the Gate’s foundation…
From op article:
“… will cripple our global economy unless we find innovative ways to keep things running."
… based on research from the Gates Foundation…”
Maybe this is trying to justify automating & digitizing everything.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 20th, 2023, 9:37 am
by pho·to·syn·the·sis
Oswald Spengler wrote in his Magnum Opus, "The Decline of the West"-
When the ordinary thought of a highly cultivated people begins to regard "having children" as a question of pro's and con's, the great turning-point has come. For Nature knows nothing of pro and con...When reasons have to be put forward at all in a question of life, life itself has become questionable. At that point begins prudent limitation of the number of births. In the Classical world the practice was deplored by Polybius as the ruin of Greece, and yet even at his date it had long been established in great cities; in subsequent Roman times it became appallingly general. At first explained by the economic misery of the times, very soon it ceased to explain itself at all.
-Oswald Spengler (The Decline of the West)pages 104-105 in volume 2 of the 1961 Knopf edition:
I firmly believe that Hormonal contraceptives have had a much greater impact on humanity, than we know or care to know. Their affects will be manifest in humanity for generations, if not in perpetuity.
Why? Look up the multiple paid studies of the Naked Mole Rat. Why show interest in a mammalian species, that exhibits eusocial behaviors?? Think about it. I believe the answer lies somewhere in the application of those studies.
Re: Global Population Drop is in Motion — What Does it Mean?
Posted: March 20th, 2023, 10:33 am
by Jamescm
simpleton wrote: ↑March 19th, 2023, 5:01 am
And Gideon had threescore and ten sons of his body begotten: for he had many wives.
Let's see, seventy sons, (not counting daughters) just from Gideon, whom God called and honored and with a measly three hundred men wiped out the powerful Midianites and their kings, (a hundred and thirty five thousand plus standing army).
So, if Gideon had those seventy sons, I would venture to guess he had what, maybe at least that many daughters?
That would resolve your population problem pretty quick. But hell no, we would rather our women keep their figures that we can continue to lust after them, by providing them with "the pill" and many other demonic devices, plus us men get ourselves snipped.
Notice that the richer, and educated the society, the less children they have.
Sorry, but God is all about "multiplying and replenishing the earth", but we in America, and even in Mormondom, are all about the butchery of our offspring.
"Maintaining your figure" and "staying fertile and having many children" are not contrary goals. I've known enough women that pull it off to know that it's possible. I've known women who have a lot of children and then blow up, but the children didn't do it. They became sedentary, and it's not just a problem of the sisters. God didn't make us "beautiful one to another" so that we could just throw that away as not being important.
The pill, though? Yeah, probably don't need it. My brain is a better internal chemist than anyone trying to sell something.
