Power trip 🤯
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Power trip 🤯
Indulge me for a minute. Put yourself in the position of the LDS church president. Every single time a person is baptized into the church, enters the temple for the first time, renews a temple recommend, or at quarterly and semi-annually gatherings, they profess their allegiance to a man. What kind of power trip does that have upon an individual?
EDIT: I'm reinstating my original comment w/ the clarifying note. What are the mental implications of placing one person in a position where everyone who joins the church must prescribe to every pronouncement you make or else they may be perceived as denying their faith in Christ? By preaching that every pronouncement from a church leader is the word and will of the Lord, everyone who sustains you must obey what you say. That is a tremendous amount of influence.
EDIT: I'm reinstating my original comment w/ the clarifying note. What are the mental implications of placing one person in a position where everyone who joins the church must prescribe to every pronouncement you make or else they may be perceived as denying their faith in Christ? By preaching that every pronouncement from a church leader is the word and will of the Lord, everyone who sustains you must obey what you say. That is a tremendous amount of influence.
Last edited by Reluctant Watchman on January 10th, 2023, 10:21 am, edited 3 times in total.
- creator
- (of the Forum)
- Posts: 8282
- Location: The Matrix
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
Is this strawman really the kind of discussion you want to have on the forum?
As admin of the forum I was previously more strict in regards to comments that are critical of Church leaders, primarily for the sake of not wanting this forum to be just like the ex-mormon/anti-mormon forums, to encourage actual positive discussion, and to avoid unnecessarily being accusers. I'd much rather spend my time on positive things than on accusing others and pointing out the negative aspects of the Church.
Obviously, I softened that moderation stance in the past few years as the Church revealed more and more that they are fully on board with Babylon and the globalist agenda (though I personally still prefer to focus more on positive things). As many Church members have expressed over the past few years, the Church crossed a line (and anyone watching could see they crossed some lines a long time ago, but now it became much more apparent.)
So, back this "Power trip" topic. Is this really what you want to spend your time thinking about and discussing? You're not even making an actual argument about a real-life event, you're creating a hypothetical event for consideration that is intended to be negative. And the Church is doing plenty of things that are deserving of criticism and opposition, but in this post you've simply built up a strawman.
Just something to think about.
As admin of the forum I was previously more strict in regards to comments that are critical of Church leaders, primarily for the sake of not wanting this forum to be just like the ex-mormon/anti-mormon forums, to encourage actual positive discussion, and to avoid unnecessarily being accusers. I'd much rather spend my time on positive things than on accusing others and pointing out the negative aspects of the Church.
Obviously, I softened that moderation stance in the past few years as the Church revealed more and more that they are fully on board with Babylon and the globalist agenda (though I personally still prefer to focus more on positive things). As many Church members have expressed over the past few years, the Church crossed a line (and anyone watching could see they crossed some lines a long time ago, but now it became much more apparent.)
So, back this "Power trip" topic. Is this really what you want to spend your time thinking about and discussing? You're not even making an actual argument about a real-life event, you're creating a hypothetical event for consideration that is intended to be negative. And the Church is doing plenty of things that are deserving of criticism and opposition, but in this post you've simply built up a strawman.
Just something to think about.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
Then delete the thread.creator wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:15 am Is this strawman really the kind of discussion you want to have on the forum?
As admin of the forum I was previously more strict in regards to comments that are critical of Church leaders, primarily for the sake of not wanting this forum to be just like the ex-mormon/anti-mormon forums, to encourage actual positive discussion, and to avoid unnecessarily being accusers. I'd much rather spend my time on positive things than on accusing others and pointing out the negative aspects of the Church.
Obviously, I softened that moderation stance in the past few years as the Church revealed more and more that they are fully on board with Babylon and the globalist agenda (though I personally still prefer to focus more on positive things). As many Church members have expressed over the past few years, the Church crossed a line (and anyone watching could see they crossed some lines a long time ago, but now it became much more apparent.)
So, back this "Power trip" topic. Is this really what you want to spend your time thinking about and discussing? You're not even making an actual argument about a real-life event, you're creating a hypothetical event for consideration that is intended to be negative. And the Church is doing plenty of things that are deserving of criticism and opposition, but in this post you've simply built up a strawman.
Just something to think about.
My intentions were to look at the mental implications of what church structure and tradition have created.
Last edited by Reluctant Watchman on January 10th, 2023, 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2303
Re: Power trip 🤯
I didn't see what you said, however I get it that being extremely angry, frustrated and so utterly betrayed.Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:32 amThen remove the thread.creator wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:15 am Is this strawman really the kind of discussion you want to have on the forum?
As admin of the forum I was previously more strict in regards to comments that are critical of Church leaders, primarily for the sake of not wanting this forum to be just like the ex-mormon/anti-mormon forums, to encourage actual positive discussion, and to avoid unnecessarily being accusers. I'd much rather spend my time on positive things than on accusing others and pointing out the negative aspects of the Church.
Obviously, I softened that moderation stance in the past few years as the Church revealed more and more that they are fully on board with Babylon and the globalist agenda (though I personally still prefer to focus more on positive things). As many Church members have expressed over the past few years, the Church crossed a line (and anyone watching could see they crossed some lines a long time ago, but now it became much more apparent.)
So, back this "Power trip" topic. Is this really what you want to spend your time thinking about and discussing? You're not even making an actual argument about a real-life event, you're creating a hypothetical event for consideration that is intended to be negative. And the Church is doing plenty of things that are deserving of criticism and opposition, but in this post you've simply built up a strawman.
Just something to think about.
You wouldn't feel that way if you didn't (at some point and still now to a large extent) love the organization that existed.
You can not get upset about something you do not care about. It is a loss, it is like a wife committing adultery. You thought she was faithful to you (or the belief system she espoused) and you come to find out she is a lying whore.
The only thing to do is to remember the basic Christian principles. Forgiveness, patience, meekness, love, etc. Not so much for her . . .but for you.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
I would also contend that this was not a Strawman argument. Given how frequently members must profess their allegiance to church authority (that evidence/support I provided) it wasn't a half-assed argument.
- creator
- (of the Forum)
- Posts: 8282
- Location: The Matrix
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
Ok, have at it. There's certainly a lot to say about power trips in the Church (I'm sure we've all seen or heard about it in various leaders). And then there's the abuse and trauma experienced by members subjected to said power trips, structure, and traditions; and the cultish behavior of many members.Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:32 amMy intentions were to look at the mental implications of what church structure and tradition have created.
- creator
- (of the Forum)
- Posts: 8282
- Location: The Matrix
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
I didn't say it was a "half-assed argument". It was a strawman. That also doesn't mean there aren't valid examples of power trips in the Church. But your original post was a strawman, since it wasn't making use of a real-life example.Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:49 am I would also contend that this was not a Strawman argument. Given how frequently members must profess their allegiance to church authority (that evidence/support I provided) it wasn't a half-assed argument.
- creator
- (of the Forum)
- Posts: 8282
- Location: The Matrix
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
ok..
Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 8:11 am Indulge me for a minute. Put yourself in the position of the LDS church president. Every single time a person is baptized into the church, enters the temple for the first time, renews a temple recommend, or at quarterly and semi-annually gatherings, they profess their allegiance to a man. What kind of power trip does that have upon an individual?
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
I guess, IMO, it wasn't an argument at all. It was a simple evaluation of the church structure and hierarchy. The outcome of such a structure and belief system has gotta be pretty mind-blowing to rest upon an individual.creator wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:55 amI didn't say it was a "half-assed argument". It was a strawman. That also doesn't mean there aren't valid examples of power trips in the Church. But your original post was a strawman, since it wasn't making use of a real-life example.Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:49 am I would also contend that this was not a Strawman argument. Given how frequently members must profess their allegiance to church authority (that evidence/support I provided) it wasn't a half-assed argument.
- creator
- (of the Forum)
- Posts: 8282
- Location: The Matrix
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
I didn't mean to ruin your fun.
Maybe I misread your intentions based on the context of other discussions you've been involved in and my perception of those discussions. Or maybe I didn't.
Everything can be looked at from so many different perspectives.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Speaking of "power trips", I recall some posts I read on Reddit back in 2015 before Ronald Rasband was call as an Apostle. A church employee had predicted he would be called because they were tasked with looking into his background (and others) for any potential red flags. Anyways, others were commenting on Rasband being example of someone on a power trip, saying that he often made it clear to those beneath him in rank that he was their superior and was to be obeyed. Reminds me of this comment he made about members being obedient and wearing masks, to be good Christians, and that it had nothing to do with taking away religious liberties of the members of the Church. The guy is a great example of power tripping.
Maybe I misread your intentions based on the context of other discussions you've been involved in and my perception of those discussions. Or maybe I didn't.
Everything can be looked at from so many different perspectives.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Speaking of "power trips", I recall some posts I read on Reddit back in 2015 before Ronald Rasband was call as an Apostle. A church employee had predicted he would be called because they were tasked with looking into his background (and others) for any potential red flags. Anyways, others were commenting on Rasband being example of someone on a power trip, saying that he often made it clear to those beneath him in rank that he was their superior and was to be obeyed. Reminds me of this comment he made about members being obedient and wearing masks, to be good Christians, and that it had nothing to do with taking away religious liberties of the members of the Church. The guy is a great example of power tripping.
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 288
Re: Power trip 🤯
There is a saying that nothing is as good or as bad as it seems only that thinking makes it so.Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 8:11 am Indulge me for a minute. Put yourself in the position of the LDS church president. Every single time a person is baptized into the church, enters the temple for the first time, renews a temple recommend, or at quarterly and semi-annually gatherings, they profess their allegiance to a man. What kind of power trip does that have upon an individual?
EDIT: I'm reinstating my original comment w/ the clarifying note. What are the mental implications of placing one person in a position where everyone who joins the church must prescribe to every pronouncement you make or else they may be perceived as denying their faith in Christ? By preaching that every pronouncement from a church leader is the word and will of the Lord, everyone who sustains you must obey what you say. That is a tremendous amount of influence.
To those that think such is a power trip – it says more about them and how they think than the individual they reference. For me to speak to this from my point of view – such would be an extremely unwanted burden that would cause great humility and concern. Personally I am of the mind that every one is responsible for their place and how they interpret it – especially to be honest to themselves about who they are and what they do. Worrying about who someone else is and what they do is flawed for so many reasons it would be impossible to list even a part. It is what we think and do that determines what is important – or should be the most important to us.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
I just can't see a humble servant of God requiring such a high level of obeisance to man when the scriptures are quite clear. I can't think of a single true prophet that would dare require such an allegiance.Pseudonym wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 11:34 am There is a saying that nothing is as good or as bad as it seems only that thinking makes it so.
To those that think such is a power trip – it says more about them and how they think than the individual they reference. For me to speak to this from my point of view – such would be an extremely unwanted burden that would cause great humility and concern. Personally I am of the mind that every one is responsible for their place and how they interpret it – especially to be honest to themselves about who they are and what they do. Worrying about who someone else is and what they do is flawed for so many reasons it would be impossible to list even a part. It is what we think and do that determines what is important – or should be the most important to us.
Oh, and believe me, things can be much, much, worse than what we actually think. I've tried for a very long time to give church leaders the benefit of the doubt. We only see what they want us to see. The lack of transparency in simple things, like finances, should at minimum be a great cause for concern.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
To take the TBM perspective, you could see this as simply a very large stewardship that the Lord has given you to bless all of God's children. But, as I always have to interject, why require them to follow every pronouncement you make, especially in order for them to enter into "saving" ordinances? The scriptures are before us all to understand who God wants us to follow and how to interpret the word of any man.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
In light of this discussion, this verse seems quite applicable, D&C 121:
37 That they may be conferred upon us, it is true; but when we undertake to cover our sins, or to gratify our pride, our vain ambition, or to exercise control or dominion or compulsion upon the souls of the children of men, in any degree of unrighteousness, behold, the heavens withdraw themselves; the Spirit of the Lord is grieved; and when it is withdrawn, Amen to the priesthood or the authority of that man.
37 That they may be conferred upon us, it is true; but when we undertake to cover our sins, or to gratify our pride, our vain ambition, or to exercise control or dominion or compulsion upon the souls of the children of men, in any degree of unrighteousness, behold, the heavens withdraw themselves; the Spirit of the Lord is grieved; and when it is withdrawn, Amen to the priesthood or the authority of that man.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
While the reference to "fun" was done most likely in jest, I find no enjoyment in seeing my brothers and sister go down a path that I feel is detrimental to their spiritual health and progression. When you peel back the layers behind mind control and conditioning, things get pretty freaky really quick. Those who are being conditioned are done so with heavy doses of truth mixed w/ doses of, well, you know.
And as far as my other "discussions", I'd hold to the same context as noted above. I would love to have a very transparent discussion w/ church leadership about all sorts of things. I do pray that they will stop doing and preaching some of the things that they are.
And yeah, I get it, there are times when I push the envelope here on the forum. Maybe my days are numbered. I'd love to simply focus on fluffy bunnies and warm fuzzies all day long.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2328
Re: Power trip 🤯
Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 11:39 amI just can't see a humble servant of God requiring such a high level of obeisance to man when the scriptures are quite clear. I can't think of a single true prophet that would dare require such an allegiance.Pseudonym wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 11:34 am There is a saying that nothing is as good or as bad as it seems only that thinking makes it so.
To those that think such is a power trip – it says more about them and how they think than the individual they reference. For me to speak to this from my point of view – such would be an extremely unwanted burden that would cause great humility and concern. Personally I am of the mind that every one is responsible for their place and how they interpret it – especially to be honest to themselves about who they are and what they do. Worrying about who someone else is and what they do is flawed for so many reasons it would be impossible to list even a part. It is what we think and do that determines what is important – or should be the most important to us.
Oh, and believe me, things can be much, much, worse than what we actually think. I've tried for a very long time to give church leaders the benefit of the doubt. We only see what they want us to see. The lack of transparency in simple things, like finances, should at minimum be a great cause for concern.
I imagine that what I should expect to hear from a true servant would be something to this effect:
Please do not ever put me on a pedestal. I am just an imperfect man and I am subject to sin and error as are all of us. I promise to do my best to follow the Spirit and do the will of the Lord, but I cannot promise that I will not fail you. That I may someday succumb to temptation or pride. That I could not be deceived by the devil, and subsequently lead you astray, if you are not in tune with the Spirit. For that reason, I implore you to always trust in the Holy Spirit and the revealed word of God in the scriptures. Never seek to praise, honor, or emulate me. Jesus Christ, alone must be your light and your example. He is the Rock. Not Peter, Not Joseph Smith. Not me. Only HIM.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
Well said, my friend. Bravo!!!blitzinstripes wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 4:29 pm I imagine that what I should expect to hear from a true servant would be something to this effect:
Please do not ever put me on a pedestal. I am just an imperfect man and I am subject to sin and error as are all of us. I promise to do my best to follow the Spirit and do the will of the Lord, but I cannot promise that I will not fail you. That I may someday succumb to temptation or pride. That I could not be deceived by the devil, and subsequently lead you astray, if you are not in tune with the Spirit. For that reason, I implore you to always trust in the Holy Spirit and the revealed word of God in the scriptures. Never seek to praise, honor, or emulate me. Jesus Christ, alone must be your light and your example. He is the Rock. Not Peter, Not Joseph Smith. Not me. Only HIM.
Just think what would happen to the church if this pronouncement was made from the pulpit at GC?
- BeNotDeceived
- Agent38
- Posts: 9078
- Location: Tralfamadore
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
One bad apple, spoiled the bunch.creator wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:54 amOk, have at it. There's certainly a lot to say about power trips in the Church (I'm sure we've all seen or heard about it in various leaders). And then there's the abuse and trauma experienced by members subjected to said power trips, structure, and traditions; and the cultish behavior of many members.Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 9:32 amMy intentions were to look at the mental implications of what church structure and tradition have created.
Unfortunately that was my experience.
Twice now, but the Walker Quake at least provided some solace that my pleas had been heard.
-
- captain of 100
- Posts: 288
Re: Power trip 🤯
Why?Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 11:39 am The lack of transparency in simple things, like finances, should at minimum be a great cause for concern.
- Reluctant Watchman
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 15807
- Location: “if thine eye offend thee, pluck him out.”
- Contact:
Re: Power trip 🤯
If you’ve never questioned that or see the need for it, then any response I give would simply be water off a duck’s back. It wouldn’t matter to you. This dives deep into the misappropriation of sacred funds, as well as requiring an incorrect tithe.Pseudonym wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 7:52 pmWhy?Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 11:39 am The lack of transparency in simple things, like finances, should at minimum be a great cause for concern.
-
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1855
Re: Power trip 🤯
There are reasons why. I suspect you'll see those reasons one of these days.Pseudonym wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 7:52 pmWhy?Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 11:39 am The lack of transparency in simple things, like finances, should at minimum be a great cause for concern.
- cyclOps
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1398
Re: Power trip 🤯
Good question, though it would appear no one actually wants to answer your question. Maybe you’re supposed to blindly prescribe to the narrative of the thread? Ironic.Pseudonym wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 7:52 pmWhy?Reluctant Watchman wrote: ↑January 10th, 2023, 11:39 am The lack of transparency in simple things, like finances, should at minimum be a great cause for concern.
Last edited by cyclOps on January 11th, 2023, 9:15 am, edited 1 time in total.