I think polygamy would be too odd. They have thoroughly vilified it by their policy and hardly anybody is asking for it. It would not be celebrated.Joan7 wrote: ↑January 13th, 2023, 9:26 pmI don't think so. Daniel indicates that action is by force. And it is after a war or the first part of a war, where the new vile person in charge comes back after the ships of Chittum stuff. But, it could be polygamy. That would sure make people mad. Outside of the Church, the persecution would come. Inside of the Church, those canyons of opinion would suddenly become unpassable and there would be that prophesied split in the Church.
On the other hand, plenty of progressive members and leaders would be elated to hear that some sealing accommodation was made for the LGBTQ crowd. They would hallow the day and want bragging rights that they were in the temple on the day of the historic announcement. It would be like Blacks and the Priesthood 2.0. Great fodder for their testimonies, to be retold for the rest of their lives.