No. YOU made it about the pamphlet. You are the one who made is explicitly about what is or is not printed in the pamphlet.Artaxerxes wrote: ↑October 1st, 2022, 2:49 pmThe discussion you stepped in to was about the FSY pamphlet. You're not claiming that you changed the subject of the thread, starting with the word "Yes." That's just ridiculous. Your point was very clear, as is the entire discussion on the thread.spiritMan wrote: ↑October 1st, 2022, 2:47 pmNo you &#%!@?!%, I did not.Artaxerxes wrote: ↑October 1st, 2022, 2:39 pmYou said, "The old pamphlet says group dating till 18."
Is that true or false?
I NEVER stated the old pamphlet says group dating till 18.
I stated "Yes it was group dating until 18." You read in between the lines and IMPLIED in your mind that I stated "FSY pamphlet states".
I don't actually mind that you read between the lines. I can see how your mind would twist what I said into something else; that's fine, that's human.
What I care about is that you are a hypocrite. For YOU it is perfectly acceptable to "read between the lines" . . .but when someone ELSE does it. No, no, no. They are idiots.
Maybe you should actually learn to live by your own rules dude.
What we are discussing is the standards of dating. Prior to today, the general standard was at age 16 group date (that is explicit in FSY), in general culturally age 18 is when people can single-date. There was never the option to immediately at age 16 start single-dating. That was not the culture.
You are the one that is making it all legalistic and attempting to win at any cost. Stop it.