NASA Lies

[gradles21]

CGI in 1969 to make that look as real as it did would not have been able to be completed.

I didn't claim the moon landing was CGI. NASA uses a lot of CGI today. Back then it would have been movie sets and filming in locations that were made to convince people it was the Moon.

Buzz Aldrin admitting it was a simulation (around the 2 minute mark):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9zITkArZCg&t=120s

Buzz Aldrin is my favorite moon landing denier.

[FoxMammaWisdom]

Escape hatches for astronauts in the rockets, and Challenger "dead" astronauts are still alive and carrying on the lies today:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1578944011439865857

[madvin]

If you were taught how gravity works in elementary school, you should share your knowledge as no one (scientists or otherwise) actually understands how it works. It's still very much a mystery. The only thing that is sort of understood is how gavity behaves, which is far from the "what causes its behavior".

Wal Thornhill, Chief Science Advisor of The Thunderbolts Project, shares his forty-year personal journey to better understand—and elucidate—the role of gravity in the EU Model of Cosmology. This noteworthy one-hour conference session was presented at EU2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkWiBxWieQU&t=3084s

[gradles21]

As well as the scientist who discovered the concept by having an apple ding off the top of his head.

You believe in some idiot who didn't discover that things fall downward until he was a grown adult.

Your mountain of evidence is produced by the very perpetrators of the crime.

And why do things fall downward, and at the same speed, regardless of weight?

This was the concept that was discovered through observation, like pretty much all of modern science. Even our own religion was based on observation followed by prayer.

Nobody knows why things fall, and that includes Newton and Einstein.

[FoxMammaWisdom]

Hear them all lie, and contradict their own lies, about the stars:

https://twitter.com/ronin19217435/statu ... WANERZMx0w

[Army Of Truth]

Escape hatches for astronauts in the rockets, and Challenger "dead" astronauts are still alive and carrying on the lies today:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1578944011439865857

yup! Anyone can look at this picture and see that not only are these the same people 3 decades later, but most are still using their same name!

[sushi_chef]

sushi_ heard that total darkness and one explanation they say is sun's, star's energy toward earth become visible light energy somehow inside of the atmosphere surrounding the earth ..

not entirely related, but life is 3d vortex thing, interesting concept ..

[BuriedTartaria]

[Army Of Truth]

I have to laugh at those that say that the moon landing is fake because of CGI. CGI in the 1960s all the way up to the 1980s was very basic still; we didn't really start seeing CGI becoming more advanced until the 1990s.

Have you not seen "2001 Space Odyssey" made in 1968, directed by Stanley Kubrick? clips from this movie look even better than the actual "Moon" landing!

[Army Of Truth]

What a coincidence that Stanley Kubrick, who directed the 2001 Space Odyssey movie, had a meeting with NASA in 1965! I wonder what NASA would want with Kubrick...

[Army Of Truth]

Anyone that takes a good look at the Lunar Lander can quickly see how fake it is!
This piece of trash couldn't survive in my swimming pool let alone the 10-17 Torr powerful Vacuum of space!

[Army Of Truth]

Shadows from one light source (like the Sun) would all be parallel.
Shadows from multiple light sources (like a Hollywood set) would NOT be parallel.
You tell me if these shadows are parallel or not.

[sushi_chef]

"Why does the universe appear black (dark)?
About the science of the universe

It is because there is nothing to reflect the sun's light.
On Earth, it is bright during the day when the sun is out and dark at night when the sun is setting.
But in space, even though the sun is out and the ISS and the Space Shuttle are brightly illuminated, the background space is pitch black.
We can see things because light shines on them and is reflected back to our eyes.

Since space is an almost empty vacuum, there is nothing to reflect light, and light passes straight through.
Therefore, since there is no light coming back to our eyes, space appears black.

On the ground, there is air, and the sun's rays hit tiny particles (molecules) in the air, which reflect in various directions, making the sky appear brighter.
This is why the sky appears bright.
The sky appears blue because blue light is reflected here and there the most.

Have you ever heard of the term "Kuroshio" in reference to ocean water?
This is very clean seawater, so
It is so called because the water is so clean that it does not reflect the sun's rays very much, making it appear black.
"
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

"The Kuroshio Current (黒潮), also known as the Black or Japan Current (日本海流, Nihon Kairyū) or the Black Stream, is a north-flowing, warm ocean current on the west side of the North Pacific Ocean basin. It was named for the deep blue appearance of its waters. Similar to the Gulf Stream in the North Atlantic, the Kuroshio is a powerful western boundary current that transports warm equatorial water poleward and forms the western limb of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Off the East Coast of Japan, it merges with the Oyashio Current to form the North Pacific Current. ..
"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuroshio_Current

[Shawn Henry]

Buzz Aldrin is my favorite moon landing denier.

Wow! I hadn't heard that one before. Thanks! That's twice he denied it.

[Shawn Henry]

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

Do all your posts use a translating service from Japanese to English?

[sushi_chef]

”Do all your posts use a translating service from Japanese to English?”

not all, when used, "Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) " should be attached, "++" means sushi_ modified a little bit..

maybe flat earth stuff was originated at nasa like moon landing hoax?? or cia like 'conspiracy theory'?? no??


"33rd Degree Mason Buzz Aldrin Brings Scottish Rite Banner to the Moon"
https://gnosticwarrior.com/33rd-degree- ... ldrin.html
buzz aldrin freemason
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=buzz+aldrin+f ... =h_&ia=web

mason's secrecy for maintaining their status higher than most people ..

[SempiternalHarbinger]

Hear them all lie, and contradict their own lies, about the stars:

https://twitter.com/ronin19217435/statu ... WANERZMx0w

Yeppers

https://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/

[FoxMammaWisdom]

Four videos in this post, clearly showing the LOCAL sun-ball in the clouds (sorry I don't know how to just share the videos not the twitter post):

https://twitter.com/i/status/1580292960947933184

[Army Of Truth]

A great video about NASA Lies!

Also my website has more videos and pics!
https://truthrevolution101.com/moon-landing/

[FoxMammaWisdom]

Four videos in this post, clearly showing the LOCAL sun-ball in the clouds (sorry I don't know how to just share the videos not the twitter post):

https://twitter.com/i/status/1580292960947933184

China launched a sun-ball and shows us one of the ways they fake it:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1580950554729394176

[Subcomandante]

What a coincidence that Stanley Kubrick, who directed the 2001 Space Odyssey movie, had a meeting with NASA in 1965! I wonder what NASA would want with Kubrick...

Movie studios hire consultants all the time if they want to get the science right. This has always been the case.

[Subcomandante]

CGI in 1969 to make that look as real as it did would not have been able to be completed.

I didn't claim the moon landing was CGI. NASA uses a lot of CGI today. Back then it would have been movie sets and filming in locations that were made to convince people it was the Moon.

Buzz Aldrin admitting it was a simulation (around the 2 minute mark):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9zITkArZCg&t=120s

Buzz Aldrin is my favorite moon landing denier.

Cherry-picked quote in the video is cherry-picked. When you listen to the entire video, he never said that they didn't go to the moon. He did say that there were no scary parts in the moon landing.

This happens a lot with flat-earthers. Everything has to be cherry-picked in order for it to make sense. And all the science that has been studied out not only by NASA but also all the other space agencies out there including from adversarial nations likewise has to be ignored.

[Subcomandante]

Four videos in this post, clearly showing the LOCAL sun-ball in the clouds (sorry I don't know how to just share the videos not the twitter post):

https://twitter.com/i/status/1580292960947933184

This is known as reflection and it is common with any light source. It is literally impossible for the sun to be just a few thousand miles up; the angles would all be messed up on the Earth. The distance to the sun of 150m km as well as the axial tilt of 23.5 degrees is a matter of scientific fact.

[Subcomandante]

Go to an automobile factory and tell them to reconstruct a 1969 Chevrolet Impala.

[bbrown]

Go to an automobile factory and tell them to reconstruct a 1969 Chevrolet Impala.
[/quote]

Fwiw there is an an entire industry that does exactly this. You can go and buy a brand new 69 Camaro, 67 mustang, 32 ford or any of a bunch of the more popular old cars. They have pretty high value too. And You can get the parts to completely build many of the not as common cars frame chassis body trim all of it, if you want, and have money. My coworker built a Camaro, and several 55-57 Chevys this way at the hot rod shop he worked at. It is a very real thing.