Page 15 of 23

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 19th, 2022, 2:18 pm
by Niemand
The same people who were on 'I'm a Mormon" keep telling us "Mormon" is rude now.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 19th, 2022, 2:25 pm
by Gadianton Slayer
EvanLM wrote: April 19th, 2022, 1:58 pm
Gadianton Slayer wrote: April 14th, 2022, 11:58 pm
Atticus wrote: April 14th, 2022, 11:48 pm
Gadianton Slayer wrote: April 14th, 2022, 11:44 pm
No problem here, Mr. DuckRabbit!
You're insinuating that true believing members of Christ's church should have their heads chopped off.

If you don't see how truly messed up that is, I don't know what to tell you.
I said those who don’t stand for freedom, which is what Moroni said… you’re the one connecting the dots there my humorless friend.

And no, your leaders do not support freedom. They urged their members to follow the wicked government and enforced mandates of their own beyond the local regulations.

Your justifications mean nothing to me, what those men have done is atrocious and vile. My friend’s father is dead because he trusted his church leaders and took the jab, and thousands of others have had their lives ruined as well.

https://www.reluctantwatchman.com/vaccine-reactions

In Pfizer’s recently released documents there are 9 pages of adverse reactions. There is no hiding the evil that was forced upon people over the last 2 years.

So much for their bullshìt about a “safe and effective” “literal godsend”.
you're twisting scriptures . . . please read the chapters reagrding the story of Moroni . . . . he followed a prophet . . the king men opposed that like some on this thread do
LOL!

Not to be harsh, but I think it may be you who needs to reread those chapters, I have them linked here with some commentary if you’d like:

https://gadiantonslayer.blogspot.com/20 ... g.html?m=1

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 19th, 2022, 3:56 pm
by Subcomandante
Gadianton Slayer wrote: April 19th, 2022, 2:25 pm
EvanLM wrote: April 19th, 2022, 1:58 pm
Gadianton Slayer wrote: April 14th, 2022, 11:58 pm
Atticus wrote: April 14th, 2022, 11:48 pm

You're insinuating that true believing members of Christ's church should have their heads chopped off.

If you don't see how truly messed up that is, I don't know what to tell you.
I said those who don’t stand for freedom, which is what Moroni said… you’re the one connecting the dots there my humorless friend.

And no, your leaders do not support freedom. They urged their members to follow the wicked government and enforced mandates of their own beyond the local regulations.

Your justifications mean nothing to me, what those men have done is atrocious and vile. My friend’s father is dead because he trusted his church leaders and took the jab, and thousands of others have had their lives ruined as well.

https://www.reluctantwatchman.com/vaccine-reactions

In Pfizer’s recently released documents there are 9 pages of adverse reactions. There is no hiding the evil that was forced upon people over the last 2 years.

So much for their bullshìt about a “safe and effective” “literal godsend”.
you're twisting scriptures . . . please read the chapters reagrding the story of Moroni . . . . he followed a prophet . . the king men opposed that like some on this thread do
LOL!

Not to be harsh, but I think it may be you who needs to reread those chapters, I have them linked here with some commentary if you’d like:

https://gadiantonslayer.blogspot.com/20 ... g.html?m=1
After reading your blog, you do make some good points, however, the Moroni stage has come and gone. We are in the Gidgiddoni stage.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 19th, 2022, 4:13 pm
by cwass
Thinker wrote: April 19th, 2022, 11:59 am
cwass wrote: April 17th, 2022, 8:17 pm
Thinker wrote: April 17th, 2022, 5:51 pm
Reluctant Watchman wrote: April 16th, 2022, 9:31 amI'm curious where the breaking point is for most current TBMs...
When they feel pain from it.

Sadly, their hearts are cold towards others who are already suffering.
The natural destination for the "I'm following the prophet" mentality is that should they be injured or die from a future booster shot that it will be a token of honor because they died following the prophet. Meanwhile, i think that pride will help them overlook the claims of "safe and effective".
It seems like people may be digging in to their positions.

I have already had at least two experiences that have shown me the determination of the faithful to follow the prophet regardless of any facts presented.
I know what you mean.
I have had such mixed emotions - right now, my heart aches for them & I feel like I just barely dodged a bullet since not too long ago, I was like them. I never dreamed that those adhering to church leaders would be so apostate from God. I always assumed apostates were those sinners who dared not go to church or who dared question anything. They still see it that way, but deep down, their higher Spirit (1st estate) knows better.
I know several people very well, personally that "knew" or seemed to feel like the jab was bad. They got the shot to "follow the prophet", keep their job and/or to be unified with their family. Question:
I know all circumstances are different but if you violate your conscience to follow the prophet can that be reconciled?

I feel I've followed the prophet. I've also stayed true to my personal experience and have taken my feelings to the temple. I come to the conclusion that you can't undo the shot and once the trial is finished and we have the true data maybe I will find out I should have gotten the shot.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 19th, 2022, 7:08 pm
by buffalo_girl
9 And their meetings were conducted by the church after the manner of the workings of the Spirit, and by the power of the Holy Ghost; for as the power of the Holy Ghost led them whether to preach, or to exhort, or to pray, or to supplicate, or to sing, even so it was done.
I don't believe I have ever experienced church meetings being conducted in the above manner. I have felt a single message influence an entire congregation by 'the power of the Holy Ghost'. It's a rarity in my experience.

Moroni 6 makes it appear that the 'structure' of Christ's Church is such that ALL righteous members are simultaneously influenced by the Holy Ghost in how the Body of the Church is conducted according to 'workings of the Spirit'.

Suggests a pretty high standard for personal and public behavior, I think. Moroni 6 is short and simple - except where does this actually occur?
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/stu ... 6?lang=eng

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 19th, 2022, 10:47 pm
by Being There
Luke wrote: April 18th, 2022, 9:22 pm
Subcomandante wrote: April 18th, 2022, 5:52 pm The very word for Church in Greek and Assembly or Congregation in Hebrew (which is translated as "Church" in the Book of Mormon) implies organization.
How on earth does that imply an organisation?
I think Sub's a little mixed up - as usual.

as we both know, and as I've said before -

D&C 10
67 Behold, this is my doctrine—whosoever repenteth and cometh unto me, the same is my church.
68 Whosoever declareth more or less than this, the same is not of me,
but is against me; therefore he is not of my church.
69 And now, behold, whosoever is of my church, and endureth of my church to the end,
him will I establish upon my rock, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against them.

now where have I heard that before - "rock" "and upon this rock I will build my church"
Matthew 16
17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood
hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church;
and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.


* "every time "church" is mentioned in the New Testament,
it refers only to the people who believe in Christ"


so the Lord is saying,
WHOEVER repents, and comes to Him IS His church, (ANYONE)
and He will build His church, with those that come to Him, the way how it was revealed to Peter that He was the Christ -
that is - through the rock of revelation - His spirit - the Holy Ghost.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 20th, 2022, 12:41 am
by larsenb
HereWeGo wrote: April 18th, 2022, 10:04 pm
larsenb wrote: April 18th, 2022, 2:55 pm
HereWeGo wrote: April 18th, 2022, 11:13 am
Thinker wrote: April 18th, 2022, 9:10 am Pretend Ref here…

Anyone who knows me may find this incredibly hard to believe, but I’ve had my fair share of squabbles. At some point it may be good to just acknowledge that:

We simply see things differently.
In some cases it may be “We are not compatible.”
No blaming ourselves or the other - we just are walking different mental paths.

Image
Good point Thinker. Remember though, we were all like this when we were young. Black and white. Right or wrong. Up or down. Nothing in the middle. We use to love debating because we knew everything. We had to prove that we were right or else that meant that we were wrong. Age and life experiences helped us move beyond thinking in absolutes. We found that we did not have to defend every challenge that came back at us. We found it easier and more satisfying to just smile and walk away. These unrelenting debaters are most likely still young, or at least have not moved beyond that mental stage of life. They will eventually chill out. Until that time, I have found it useful to block people when they go on and on ad nausium so that my time isn't wasted. I then unblock them when I find that they finally stop.
Good posts. There is a psychological profile or 'disorder' called 'borderline personality', where a prime characteristic of the 'syndrome' is black-and-white thinking. Psychologists note that this tendency (exhibiting borderline personality traits) is strongly present in most mid to older adolescents. Those fortunate enough, outgrow the tendency to a large degree.
This post turned on the light for me. My ex-wife was diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychiatrist said that she was functioning on an emotional level of a 15 year old. Dealing with her for 10 years was like watching the aggressive debating from the ones above. No wonder it drives me crazy with the twisting of words, gaslighting, etc. Its like I am reliving my marriage to her. She ended up falling in love with a 16 year old neighbor boy and spent time in prison for what she did with him. It was a good deal for me because our marriage was over. I did end up raising her youngest 2 teen kids which was fine with me.
Tough row you had to hoe. Sympathies.

I became aware of this subject after having worked with a mid-20s woman, who had rather extreme characteristics, including developing an extreme hatred for me for no apparent reason . . . . very black and white.

I would describe her behavior to my wife who was working as a psychiatric nurse at the time at the UofU, and she tagged the woman as having 'borderline personality disorder' probably entrenched in her personality by sexual abuse. The latter was evident, according to my wife, because she was the girlfriend (living with) to a 50+ year old man. I.e., acting out her abuse w/a comparable older man. Another indication of this was when she returned videos borrowed from another worker, with some of the video boxes containing pornographic movies instead of the originals videos

Almost 2/3rds of a year into this ordeal of having to work with such a woman, she suddenly started treating me nicely and as suddenly turned on our mutual boss. The black-and-white thing again. And about two months after this she suddenly disappeared, and was later found suicided.

More to the story, but I guess the point of it is to suggest that those who carry this kind of syndrome into adulthood, probably suffered some kind of abuse when they were younger. Which in the case of this woman, was verified by those close to her.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 20th, 2022, 12:57 am
by Robin Hood
Being There wrote: April 19th, 2022, 10:47 pm
Luke wrote: April 18th, 2022, 9:22 pm
Subcomandante wrote: April 18th, 2022, 5:52 pm The very word for Church in Greek and Assembly or Congregation in Hebrew (which is translated as "Church" in the Book of Mormon) implies organization.
How on earth does that imply an organisation?
I think Sub's a little mixed up - as usual.

as we both know, and as I've said before -

D&C 10
67 Behold, this is my doctrine—whosoever repenteth and cometh unto me, the same is my church.
68 Whosoever declareth more or less than this, the same is not of me,
but is against me; therefore he is not of my church.
69 And now, behold, whosoever is of my church, and endureth of my church to the end,
him will I establish upon my rock, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against them.

now where have I heard that before - "rock" "and upon this rock I will build my church"
Matthew 16
17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood
hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church;
and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.


* "every time "church" is mentioned in the New Testament,
it refers only to the people who believe in Christ"


so the Lord is saying,
WHOEVER repents, and comes to Him IS His church, (ANYONE)
and He will build His church, with those that come to Him, the way how it was revealed to Peter that He was the Christ -
that is - through the rock of revelation - His spirit - the Holy Ghost.
I think Hugh Nibley's take on the "gates of hell" statement is interesting. He claims the gates of hell is another way if saying "death". So death will not prevail against those who believe on Christ, meaning - he will give us eternal life.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 20th, 2022, 10:16 am
by HereWeGo
larsenb wrote: April 20th, 2022, 12:41 am
HereWeGo wrote: April 18th, 2022, 10:04 pm
larsenb wrote: April 18th, 2022, 2:55 pm
HereWeGo wrote: April 18th, 2022, 11:13 am

Good point Thinker. Remember though, we were all like this when we were young. Black and white. Right or wrong. Up or down. Nothing in the middle. We use to love debating because we knew everything. We had to prove that we were right or else that meant that we were wrong. Age and life experiences helped us move beyond thinking in absolutes. We found that we did not have to defend every challenge that came back at us. We found it easier and more satisfying to just smile and walk away. These unrelenting debaters are most likely still young, or at least have not moved beyond that mental stage of life. They will eventually chill out. Until that time, I have found it useful to block people when they go on and on ad nausium so that my time isn't wasted. I then unblock them when I find that they finally stop.
Good posts. There is a psychological profile or 'disorder' called 'borderline personality', where a prime characteristic of the 'syndrome' is black-and-white thinking. Psychologists note that this tendency (exhibiting borderline personality traits) is strongly present in most mid to older adolescents. Those fortunate enough, outgrow the tendency to a large degree.
This post turned on the light for me. My ex-wife was diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychiatrist said that she was functioning on an emotional level of a 15 year old. Dealing with her for 10 years was like watching the aggressive debating from the ones above. No wonder it drives me crazy with the twisting of words, gaslighting, etc. Its like I am reliving my marriage to her. She ended up falling in love with a 16 year old neighbor boy and spent time in prison for what she did with him. It was a good deal for me because our marriage was over. I did end up raising her youngest 2 teen kids which was fine with me.
Tough row you had to hoe. Sympathies.

I became aware of this subject after having worked with a mid-20s woman, who had rather extreme characteristics, including developing an extreme hatred for me for no apparent reason . . . . very black and white.

I would describe her behavior to my wife who was working as a psychiatric nurse at the time at the UofU, and she tagged the woman as having 'borderline personality disorder' probably entrenched in her personality by sexual abuse. The latter was evident, according to my wife, because she was the girlfriend (living with) to a 50+ year old man. I.e., acting out her abuse w/a comparable older man. Another indication of this was when she returned videos borrowed from another worker, with some of the video boxes containing pornographic movies instead of the originals videos

Almost 2/3rds of a year into this ordeal of having to work with such a woman, she suddenly started treating me nicely and as suddenly turned on our mutual boss. The black-and-white thing again. And about two months after this she suddenly disappeared, and was later found suicided.

More to the story, but I guess the point of it is to suggest that those who carry this kind of syndrome into adulthood, probably suffered some kind of abuse when they were younger. Which in the case of this woman, was verified by those close to her.
This was the case with my ex. Father had sexually abused her from 14 to 15 years old. She said she had gone to counselling and had gotten past it. A year after we were married, SURPRIZE!

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 20th, 2022, 5:31 pm
by larsenb
HereWeGo wrote: April 20th, 2022, 10:16 am
larsenb wrote: April 20th, 2022, 12:41 am
HereWeGo wrote: April 18th, 2022, 10:04 pm
larsenb wrote: April 18th, 2022, 2:55 pm
Good posts. There is a psychological profile or 'disorder' called 'borderline personality', where a prime characteristic of the 'syndrome' is black-and-white thinking. Psychologists note that this tendency (exhibiting borderline personality traits) is strongly present in most mid to older adolescents. Those fortunate enough, outgrow the tendency to a large degree.
This post turned on the light for me. My ex-wife was diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychiatrist said that she was functioning on an emotional level of a 15 year old. Dealing with her for 10 years was like watching the aggressive debating from the ones above. No wonder it drives me crazy with the twisting of words, gaslighting, etc. Its like I am reliving my marriage to her. She ended up falling in love with a 16 year old neighbor boy and spent time in prison for what she did with him. It was a good deal for me because our marriage was over. I did end up raising her youngest 2 teen kids which was fine with me.
Tough row you had to hoe. Sympathies.

I became aware of this subject after having worked with a mid-20s woman, who had rather extreme characteristics, including developing an extreme hatred for me for no apparent reason . . . . very black and white.

I would describe her behavior to my wife who was working as a psychiatric nurse at the time at the UofU, and she tagged the woman as having 'borderline personality disorder' probably entrenched in her personality by sexual abuse. The latter was evident, according to my wife, because she was the girlfriend (living with) to a 50+ year old man. I.e., acting out her abuse w/a comparable older man. Another indication of this was when she returned videos borrowed from another worker, with some of the video boxes containing pornographic movies instead of the originals videos

Almost 2/3rds of a year into this ordeal of having to work with such a woman, she suddenly started treating me nicely and as suddenly turned on our mutual boss. The black-and-white thing again. And about two months after this she suddenly disappeared, and was later found suicided.

More to the story, but I guess the point of it is to suggest that those who carry this kind of syndrome into adulthood, probably suffered some kind of abuse when they were younger. Which in the case of this woman, was verified by those close to her.
This was the case with my ex. Father had sexually abused her from 14 to 15 years old. She said she had gone to counselling and had gotten past it. A year after we were married, SURPRIZE!
The damage done.

Not long after I got out of the army, I worked with a fellow who had just gotten married. We did a fair amount of socializing together. After about 15 years and when I had moved back into this area, I looked him up. He had become a bishop, but was having marriage problems where his wife at about the age of 35 started going out to bars and allowing herself to be picked up. He divorced her, and a few years later she suicided.

Again, it turns out she had been a victim of abuse at an early age and apparently started breaking down and acting out when she reached the age of her original abuser.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 20th, 2022, 9:52 pm
by HereWeGo
larsenb wrote: April 20th, 2022, 5:31 pm
HereWeGo wrote: April 20th, 2022, 10:16 am
larsenb wrote: April 20th, 2022, 12:41 am
HereWeGo wrote: April 18th, 2022, 10:04 pm

This post turned on the light for me. My ex-wife was diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychiatrist said that she was functioning on an emotional level of a 15 year old. Dealing with her for 10 years was like watching the aggressive debating from the ones above. No wonder it drives me crazy with the twisting of words, gaslighting, etc. Its like I am reliving my marriage to her. She ended up falling in love with a 16 year old neighbor boy and spent time in prison for what she did with him. It was a good deal for me because our marriage was over. I did end up raising her youngest 2 teen kids which was fine with me.
Tough row you had to hoe. Sympathies.

I became aware of this subject after having worked with a mid-20s woman, who had rather extreme characteristics, including developing an extreme hatred for me for no apparent reason . . . . very black and white.

I would describe her behavior to my wife who was working as a psychiatric nurse at the time at the UofU, and she tagged the woman as having 'borderline personality disorder' probably entrenched in her personality by sexual abuse. The latter was evident, according to my wife, because she was the girlfriend (living with) to a 50+ year old man. I.e., acting out her abuse w/a comparable older man. Another indication of this was when she returned videos borrowed from another worker, with some of the video boxes containing pornographic movies instead of the originals videos

Almost 2/3rds of a year into this ordeal of having to work with such a woman, she suddenly started treating me nicely and as suddenly turned on our mutual boss. The black-and-white thing again. And about two months after this she suddenly disappeared, and was later found suicided.

More to the story, but I guess the point of it is to suggest that those who carry this kind of syndrome into adulthood, probably suffered some kind of abuse when they were younger. Which in the case of this woman, was verified by those close to her.
This was the case with my ex. Father had sexually abused her from 14 to 15 years old. She said she had gone to counselling and had gotten past it. A year after we were married, SURPRIZE!
The damage done.

Not long after I got out of the army, I worked with a fellow who had just gotten married. We did a fair amount of socializing together. After about 15 years and when I had moved back into this area, I looked him up. He had become a bishop, but was having marriage problems where his wife at about the age of 35 started going out to bars and allowing herself to be picked up. He divorced her, and a few years later she suicided.

Again, it turns out she had been a victim of abuse at an early age and apparently started breaking down and acting out when she reached the age of her original abuser.
Interesting. Same with my ex. She attempted suicide several times for attention after our divorce and went too far the last time. She recovered but died at an early age. Death certificate said natural causes but her kids doubt that.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 21st, 2022, 2:52 am
by ransomme
Subcomandante wrote: April 18th, 2022, 5:50 pm
Responding to your (RW's) essay:

Part 1: The Church does not teach to follow the prophet as an exclusionary device but more like follow the prophet because He follows Christ. You follow both. Not one at the expense of the other.

Part 2: What was to become the saving ordinances was not yet finalized when the Wentworth letter was made. This was 1842. Nauvoo's temple was still under construction at the time.

Part 3: Everyone, poor or rich, has been asked to sacrifice their part to building up the Kingdom of God. Jesus appreciated the widow's mite more than many that donated weeks or months' loads of salary because she had given to Jesus everything.

Part 4: The Church does this part quite a bit in the local arena as well as global. It also looks to the future with anticipation because unlike many people on this board, it is quite obvious that the Lord requires a good effort from everyone. Zion's not going to come down like Tinker Bell pixie dust. It will require our consecrated efforts to bring that to pass. The 150 billion dollars is still a proverbial drop in the bucket compared to what Zion will cost in time, effort, and money.

Part 5: There is ample evidence that Joseph Smith did practice polygamy and was sealed to various women. That is a matter of public record. The Book of Mormon did not completely condemn polygamy, but did give one reason why polygamy would be permitted: To raise up seed to the Lord. This is a matter of fact in multiple dispensations. Once the amount of seed has gotten up to a critical mass, then polygamy would no longer be needed, and that's essentially what happened with the modern day Church.

Part 6: You act as if this was the only way. The rest of the post under 6 reads like something I would find out of "The Mormon Worker." No one can be forced into riches. But they can be taught how to work and find marketable skills in order not to be poor any longer. The Church through its self reliance education does its best to fulfill that scripture that there will be no more poor among us. Instead of lamenting and complaining, they take action.

7. That's not like the testimony meetings that I see in my ward, or in several other wards that I have seen. Now, given, where I do see an example like that marked in blue, I see that more often up and down the 15 corridor north of Vegas and south of the Montana border. Outside that, pretty much every testimony meeting I have seen is that which you describe in red.

8. The Church is in NO position to condemn and attack the secret combinations; it is nowhere near strong enough to stand on its own with the world combined against them. Any foolhardy attempt to copy a Captain Moroni style of attack would be met with stiff resistance and humiliating defeat. The best we can hope for today is a Gidgiddoni situation, not making everything public for all to hear, but quietly telling the members what they need to do for the rainy days ahead. And simply, NOT TO PARTICIPATE personally with the secret combos. That will starve them out, little by little. But this will require us uniting with people of other faiths who think similarly about what is going on, which is what the Church is doing here, smartly, intelligently, not rashly.

9. Most pharmaceutical drugs come from herbs. People have known that herbs have distinct medicinal properties, so you have people experienced in organic chemistry that find out how come two very different herbs have similar medicinal properties, and they isolate the chemicals from those herbs to form the pharmaceutical drugs we have today.
Vaccines? Not too much different. Some wise doctor figured out that if you were to give the body a weakened form of a bacteria or a virus, the immune system would be in a much better position to combat it, so that if the real form of the virus or bacteria attacked, the immune system would recognize the threat and stamp it out before it could get a person sick.

Keep in mind that Joseph Smith was very traumatized with the medicine that he received; going through a painful surgery as a young boy and watching his brother get sick and die from a type of medicine that contained mercury, a very poisonous chemical to ingest. Brigham Young, closely acquainted with Joseph Smith, undoubtedly had this in mind when he counseled the Saints these same things, but upon seeing the medical profession becoming full of "gentiles," he wisely sent elders east to learn of medicine and to bring these things back to Utah. Did Brigham fall? No. He learned, and he swallowed his pride.

10. The temples, though beautiful to look on, I could hardly describe as ornate, when comparing to other buildings that I have seen that are quite important in other faiths. Ever seen the national mosques under Islam? Let's not even go to Makkah or Madinah, let's go to Abu Dhabi (picture attached). There's not a single building owned by the Church that even comes to a hundredth of the ornateness or beauty of the Abu Dhabi mosque. Have you seen the cathedrals described as "National Cathedrals" in the different countries of the world under Catholicism or Orthodoxy? Or even those buildings described as local cathedrals. There is a ton more gold inside of the Basilica of Ocotlan in my local city of Tlaxcala, than there is in the Mexico City Temple. And the Basilica of Ocotlan isn't even the most important church in the city of Tlaxcala, population 100k! You do exaggerate much in that part. Perhaps because you are not well-traveled.

11. Different situation, that exhibited in the Book of Mormon versus now. The Book of Mormon you only see two countries. Now we have two hundred, each one with differing definitions on things like rights and freedoms.

12. I'll give you that one, albeit the Book of Mormon referenced the Lamanites who in this dispensation were NEVER prohibited from holding the priesthood. The Africans however were under a different set of restrictions that were employed from the Old Testament of the Bible.

13. Blood Atonement was taught by Brigham, however not taught afterwards, and is condemned by today's Church.

14. Not everyone can handle wine. Not everyone can handle bread either. The Church makes adjustments for both. It would be very interesting to try to impose the wine requirement on those that live in the Muslim countries in the Middle East where wine or any alcohol for that matter is strictly forbidden Good thing the Lord saw that coming.

15. Local meetings continue to be conducted under the Spirit. The General Authorities give their general conference messages under the conduct of the Spirit, preparing anywhere from a few hours to a full six months for their talks.

16. No one denies the gift of prophesy but it must be had in the sphere of influence of the person that is prophesying. No one outside of the FP and Q12 can prophesy to the entire Church and make it binding on the Church to follow. You could have someone from outside the hierarchy come, with the hierarchy's blessing (think Samuel the Lamanite in this case, or Balaam's case in the Old Testament when he refused to curse Israel), but it must come with their blessing. Occasionally you will get an Abinadi moment where someone from outside of the hierarchy comes, but that must be because all the hierarchy has been corrupted, selected by wicked men. We have no evidence of that in the Church today that any one of the 15 (much less all of them) are as the priests of King Noah.

17. This is now done for administrative purposes. But it's not the 12, 14, or 16 year old's fault that they haven't received these types of manifestations. You could have someone the age of a baby receive the manifestation. It all depends on how the work is done at home.

18. The Gospel will be taken from the Gentiles for their consistent insolence and their inability to obey the Gospel because it contradicts their political or social views. Maybe ten years ago, I would have guessed that those called Progmos would be the guys to do it (fall away). But there are many rock-solid members that are falling away too over many trivialities and a lack of proper understanding. If you go down to Latin America, or read the accounts of the Church in Spanish, virtually everyone is following the counsel of the leaders of the Church, with very few dissentions. North of the border, that is a very different story. You just had a Latino and an Asian get called as Apostles, and more and more people from different groups are being called to be General Authorities. The Church is starting to be handed over towards those of Israel as the Americans and Europeans start dwindling in unbelief, just as the scriptures foretold!

19. The Kingdom of God is on the earth today, though not in its fullness. That will come in the Millennium on the Earth.

20. If what you say is true, how come the leaders are constantly calling the members to repentance? How come the members willfully rebel against the Lord when an apostle reminds people about the Plan of Salvation?

To answer your final questions:

The Gentiles are those that came over from the European nations, both members and non-members. Their lot is cast in a bad way unless they repent.

You are not rejected from a chapel for being poor. You will be rejected if you don't follow local health protocols like the wearing of a mask or in countries where they require it, a vaccination certificate. That's not on the Church, however, but on the governments enforcing those regulations.
1. Saying "at the exclusion of" is an overstatement (too extreme in a strawman way). They definitely heavily teach/promote "follow the prophet" and I hear it echoed in the thoughts of many members from different countries (as a sample we have members from at least 27 different countries in my ward). Even to the point "that they were depending on the Prophet, hence were darkened in their minds, in consequence of neglecting the duties devolving upon themselves...” (TPJS p. 238). In other words, they rely to much on following the Prophet rather than developing their own spiritual muscles by seeking Him, trying to hear Him, etc. And stating that they can't lead astray is false doctrine.

2. Who finalizes them? Weren't they finalized back at the foundation of the world? The point was how those things are taught in the BoM vs the change with all of its implications, especially by adding "first". Few things are taught more clearly and consistently as:
"…I must speak concerning the doctrine of Christ;...
Wherefore, do the things which I have told you I have seen that your Lord and your Redeemer should do; for, for this cause have they been shown unto me, that ye might know the gate by which ye should enter. For the gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost.
And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save.
Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life." - 2 Nephi 31:2,17,19,20

3. That is inaccurate, see the tithing thread. Anyhow the widow's mite was really about her heart vs the rich man's heart, and not about everyone has to pay. About their attitudes toward consecration. Then how the stewards use the donations is another ball of wax.

4. Completely wrong, temporally minded. God doesn't need money. What God requires are a broken heart and a contrite spirit. The Gentiles (including the CoJCoLDS) for the greater part will reject the fullness of the Gospel, which is why the Remnant of Jacob will lead the building of New Jerusalem. Also, Zion is not found in buildings, it is found in hearts and minds (broken hears and contrite spirits).

5. Look again. Joseph did not have multiple carnal wives. Joseph and Hyrum up until their deaths worked and spoke out against polygamy.
""A few years ago [May 1869 to April 1870] I obtained the affidavits of as many as I knew of, with a few exceptions, who received personal instructions or commandment from The Prophet respecting the Subject of celestial marriage [,] all of which are filed away in the H.O. [Historian’s Office]…. When the subject first came before my mind I must say I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence, I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the Subject, as connected with the Prophet Joseph himself. There was nothing written and but few living who were personally knowing to the fact that Joseph Taught the principle. True much had been written in support of the Doctrine, bearing upon scriptural-and rational evidences, but not a word, except the Revelation itself. Showing that the The Prophet was the Author-under God…."" (Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, Volume 1: History, Brian C. Hales, p. 9

Not a surprise seeing as how all the "evidence" came from 2nd or 3rd or more hands after Joseph's death and separated in time by up to decades from Joseph.

6. It is the only way in a sense. That is an attribute of Zion, "no poor among them" (Moses 7)

7. It's not about the 15-corridor culture, it is about what is taught from the pulpit by the 15.

8. The Church doesn't need to fight SC's, it's members do. It's hard for members to fight the good fight if the Church is supporting and promoting a number of them.

9. No most pharmaceutical drugs do not come from herbs. What they do is try to come up with synthetic versions so they can patent them.
Vaccines are an interesting concept, but they aren't as effective as they are promoted to be, and they have more adverse effects than are attributed to them.
Saying that BY swallowed his Pride is kinda funny. BY was the epitome of pride and self aggrandizment.

10. Our sanctuaries are indeed very fine, who are you kidding? Besides saying that there are more fine structures is a matter of degree, it's also a Red Herring fallacy.

11. The promised land is a land of liberty for a reason. Teaching a yielding to the enticings of incorrect principles is unbecoming and wrong. You know life is not about being comfortable it should be about the truth: finding it and teaching it. Seek ye first the kingdom of God.

12. Wrong again. You do not understand what darkness means, what God is Love is, what the land of Canaan was and how that is different than Ham's son Canaan, what Cain's, Lamech's and others' curse was, what Cain's mark was, and more.

13. Condemned? Do we have any signs of it being truly condemned? I question this, because that would mean that a prophet can lead us astray.

14. Your arguments here are mostly pointless. Grape juice is wine. New wine is from pressed grapes prior to fermentation. But that's neither here nor there really. The point is the ordinance and not water vs wine or bread vs rice cakes. Personally, I think the sacramental bread should be unleavened just as it was at the Last Supper.

15. There is a difference between prepared words (not that it is always wrong to prepare) and "take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost." (Mark 3:11)

16. He didn't say that others can or should prophesy for the entire Church. The point was that if one receives prophecy the test should not be whether it differs from the words of the current 15. For instance, on multiple occasions, my family and many that I know received clear personal revelation not to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccine despite that going against what the 15 taught on the matter. Were we wrong? Or Is it just because the 15 didn't say that one had to take it but only called it a "godsend" and 'strongly urged' us to take it that this situation doesn't qualify?

17. His argument is that it shouldn't be systematic.

18. Gong is of Asian descent but he is American. And you know it was kind of funny that just the other day my German/Swiss friend made a comment about how American Urchdorf is after living there and being in the 15 for quite a while now. Anyhow it is not isolated to N.A.

19. Actually it will come before the millennium when New Jerusalem is built during the time of tribulation. Just saying.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 21st, 2022, 3:11 am
by ransomme
EvanLM wrote: April 19th, 2022, 2:03 pm of course, if you can pick another scripture where men did NOT follow the prophets with good results then, . . . well . . . then . . .how bout alma the older who was a priest . . a priest who abandoned his church and got new revelation and priesthood power . . . tell me about that . . .

or Limhi who put the nephites into bondage cuz he made a deal with the Lamanite king . . . just expound on those . . . and relate these stories to us today and I'd be more likely to agree once you have made your point . . .

however, I will not make your point for you . . . cuz I do support this church of Christ today and what he has decided will be now . . .knowing that soon it will change so drastically that even you may reject the servant, too . . .
You are missing the point. Is it deliberate? He is not saying to never follow a prophet.

We should never follow the prophet for the sake of following the prophet as a principle. We should follow a prophet's teachings when they come from God, as far as they lead us to God, etc.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 21st, 2022, 4:46 am
by Reluctant Watchman
ransomme wrote: April 21st, 2022, 3:11 am
EvanLM wrote: April 19th, 2022, 2:03 pm of course, if you can pick another scripture where men did NOT follow the prophets with good results then, . . . well . . . then . . .how bout alma the older who was a priest . . a priest who abandoned his church and got new revelation and priesthood power . . . tell me about that . . .

or Limhi who put the nephites into bondage cuz he made a deal with the Lamanite king . . . just expound on those . . . and relate these stories to us today and I'd be more likely to agree once you have made your point . . .

however, I will not make your point for you . . . cuz I do support this church of Christ today and what he has decided will be now . . .knowing that soon it will change so drastically that even you may reject the servant, too . . .
You are missing the point. Is it deliberate? He is not saying to never follow a prophet.

We should never follow the prophet for the sake of following the prophet as a principle. We should follow a prophet's teachings when they come from God, as far as they lead us to God, etc.
The doctrine of how we learn any precept from the Lord couldn’t be more clear than in 2 Nephi 28:30-31. The Lord teaches us precept by precept. We will be cursed if we trust man without receiving a witness of the Holy Ghost. It’s the most basic of primary lessons.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 21st, 2022, 5:44 am
by anonymous91
HereWeGo wrote: April 20th, 2022, 10:16 am
larsenb wrote: April 20th, 2022, 12:41 am
HereWeGo wrote: April 18th, 2022, 10:04 pm
larsenb wrote: April 18th, 2022, 2:55 pm
Good posts. There is a psychological profile or 'disorder' called 'borderline personality', where a prime characteristic of the 'syndrome' is black-and-white thinking. Psychologists note that this tendency (exhibiting borderline personality traits) is strongly present in most mid to older adolescents. Those fortunate enough, outgrow the tendency to a large degree.
This post turned on the light for me. My ex-wife was diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. Psychiatrist said that she was functioning on an emotional level of a 15 year old. Dealing with her for 10 years was like watching the aggressive debating from the ones above. No wonder it drives me crazy with the twisting of words, gaslighting, etc. Its like I am reliving my marriage to her. She ended up falling in love with a 16 year old neighbor boy and spent time in prison for what she did with him. It was a good deal for me because our marriage was over. I did end up raising her youngest 2 teen kids which was fine with me.
Tough row you had to hoe. Sympathies.

I became aware of this subject after having worked with a mid-20s woman, who had rather extreme characteristics, including developing an extreme hatred for me for no apparent reason . . . . very black and white.

I would describe her behavior to my wife who was working as a psychiatric nurse at the time at the UofU, and she tagged the woman as having 'borderline personality disorder' probably entrenched in her personality by sexual abuse. The latter was evident, according to my wife, because she was the girlfriend (living with) to a 50+ year old man. I.e., acting out her abuse w/a comparable older man. Another indication of this was when she returned videos borrowed from another worker, with some of the video boxes containing pornographic movies instead of the originals videos

Almost 2/3rds of a year into this ordeal of having to work with such a woman, she suddenly started treating me nicely and as suddenly turned on our mutual boss. The black-and-white thing again. And about two months after this she suddenly disappeared, and was later found suicided.

More to the story, but I guess the point of it is to suggest that those who carry this kind of syndrome into adulthood, probably suffered some kind of abuse when they were younger. Which in the case of this woman, was verified by those close to her.
This was the case with my ex. Father had sexually abused her from 14 to 15 years old. She said she had gone to counselling and had gotten past it. A year after we were married, SURPRIZE!
My ex had the same thing, crazy how many of us lived through this.

It does help me immediately recognize when people or organizations are attempting to gaslight me though (hint: media's been doing this for years).

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 21st, 2022, 9:39 am
by Thinker
cwass wrote: April 19th, 2022, 4:13 pmI know several people very well, personally that "knew" or seemed to feel like the jab was bad. They got the shot to "follow the prophet", keep their job and/or to be unified with their family. Question:
I know all circumstances are different but if you violate your conscience to follow the prophet can that be reconciled?

I feel I've followed the prophet. I've also stayed true to my personal experience and have taken my feelings to the temple. I come to the conclusion that you can't undo the shot and once the trial is finished and we have the true data maybe I will find out I should have gotten the shot.
You bring up significant ideas.

Time is already revealing the shots are way more risky than any benefit… for some fatal, for some health problems, some maybe have yet to experience long-term complications from the shots, & some are known to have received the placebo/saline. Be grateful you didn’t get the shot. “Good fruit cannot come from a bad tree.” Consider the evil, the deception, censorship, illegal medical coercion - that has happened to try to get everyone to participate in their sick, secret experiment that they won’t tell more about for like 50 years. So many signs of being rotten to the core.

Church tradition teaches that the only unforgivable thing is denying the Holy Ghost - but I interpret that differently. Forgive= GIVE to go FOR-ward. To deny the Spirit is to dam yourself - hold yourself back from progressing - not indefinitely but until you correct course. If someone felt the Spirit to avoid the shot - but took it anyway - may suffer physical & spiritual consequences that would hinder them. My sister took the 1st shot under pressure - but then studied & not only refused any more but also has made effort to warn others.

We all screw up regularly - in various ways - & don’t always follow the Spirit. Ideally, we make at-one whatever we screwed up… maybe even take more response-ability as Christ showed by example. Eg., Maybe genuine repentance of abortion is not just saying sorry but also being a voice for & defending other children (developing humans) from getting killed.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 22nd, 2022, 2:18 pm
by EvanLM
i just think this . . it may not be true . . . that MOST members have never had a real HG experience if I can call it an experience . . . I think that they hear the testimonies, see the miracles . . but have never really experienced them OR . . . if they have experienced them . . . .but they do not recognize them as coming through the HG from Christ . . .

I have to admire those who stay active and try, try, try . . .but I do think their lives would be more satisfying and real if they had or recognized this great gift . . .

not enough taught us on how to recognize it . . .

of course some people in the church are great bs ers . . so that makes others feel a little fearful . . .or worried that they don't get it . . .

I started with an intellectual testimony . . when that changed then I could name the times in my life when I knew that Christ had intervened and I had not recognized it as a child . . .

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 22nd, 2022, 4:03 pm
by Thinker
EvanLM wrote: April 22nd, 2022, 2:18 pm. . . .but they do not recognize them as coming through the HG from Christ . . .

not enough taught us on how to recognize it . . .
I tend to think faith is too important for the Spirit to be as clear as a manual. And “there are many spirits”!
*The spirit of friendship
*The spirit of service
*The spirit of Christmas
*The spirit of contention
*The spirit of gratitude
*The spirit of honesty
*The spirit of hope
…& who knows how many more!

It is said & I believe the soul is more complex & interconnected than our amazingly intelligent body systems. Yet, we are held back in kindergarten lessons in Sunday School. Gotta take the bull by the horns - make it happen. Explore the soul.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 23rd, 2022, 1:26 pm
by EvanLM
Reluctant Watchman wrote: April 21st, 2022, 4:46 am
ransomme wrote: April 21st, 2022, 3:11 am
EvanLM wrote: April 19th, 2022, 2:03 pm of course, if you can pick another scripture where men did NOT follow the prophets with good results then, . . . well . . . then . . .how bout alma the older who was a priest . . a priest who abandoned his church and got new revelation and priesthood power . . . tell me about that . . .

or Limhi who put the nephites into bondage cuz he made a deal with the Lamanite king . . . just expound on those . . . and relate these stories to us today and I'd be more likely to agree once you have made your point . . .

however, I will not make your point for you . . . cuz I do support this church of Christ today and what he has decided will be now . . .knowing that soon it will change so drastically that even you may reject the servant, too . . .
You are missing the point. Is it deliberate? He is not saying to never follow a prophet.

We should never follow the prophet for the sake of following the prophet as a principle. We should follow a prophet's teachings when they come from God, as far as they lead us to God, etc.
The doctrine of how we learn any precept from the Lord couldn’t be more clear than in 2 Nephi 28:30-31. The Lord teaches us precept by precept. We will be cursed if we trust man without receiving a witness of the Holy Ghost. It’s the most basic of primary lessons.
yep

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 23rd, 2022, 1:37 pm
by EvanLM
anonymous91 wrote: April 18th, 2022, 8:47 pm
Artaxerxes wrote: April 18th, 2022, 8:41 pm
anonymous91 wrote: April 18th, 2022, 8:38 pm
Reluctant Watchman wrote: April 16th, 2022, 9:31 am I'm curious where the breaking point is for most current TBMs. We obviously have a few on here who were unphased by the mandates. And choose to ignore the damage caused, either due to ignorance or cognitive dissonance.
I'd be curious to know that too. What line is too far for these TBM?

From what I can tell, many TBM's keep moving that line infinitely. If this is the case, then the saying "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" would be most appropriate.

Maybe we ought to create a separate thread with a poll of what line people refuse to accept. At the very least, it would be enlightening. I may do this later this week, send me any ideas you have for the poll.
I assume the line for most is the same: whenever God says it's no longer His church. It doesn't matter to me whether I like or don't like what the church does.
How would we even know that? or determine this? It's not like God is going to just come down and announce this to everyone unless I am missing something.

Would that come from a personal witness you receive? Would this come from a "prophet" or someone claiming to be a prophet?

Maybe this comes from the Bible itself, where it talks about knowing them by their fruits. If that's the case, God's position is already crystal clear to most of us. Although, that seems to be based on one's personal interpretation of the Bible.

Curious to know though. I'll start a new thread on this later this week though, it'll be interesting to know everyone's thoughts.
prophecy tells us this WILL happen . . . tells us the events that will target the time for it to happen . . . God has ALREADY announced it . . . prophecy scriptures tell us how we will know . . . this is not hard . . . it has been the prophets of our current church that want us to rely on them . . . and because of that prideful attitude then they have lost a lot of mormons . . . apostasy has occured and members are leaving the church . . .

this does not tell you how I feel about the prophets . . just the truth of what is going on . . .

the ones who are faithful to the church ask questions like you do . . confused when God has made it so clear . . . the prophets could have been keeping us clear on this by quoting prophecies that we would need to know to be prepared for these events . . . those prophets in the 70s and a few other years . . .did just that . . .

but brother, all is not lost . . .the scriptures contain the direction of those who are called to do the work in the last day . . . its all there . . . needs the HG to understand anbd we have been promised by Nephi, Mormon, Moroni, old testament prophets, as well, that we will understand the prophecies of Isaiah and John . . . I have read the words of prophets who tell us that . . .

the apostasy of the people of this church including the prophets . . . is the fulfilling of a prophecy that could suggest we are very close to the savior's return . . . get your head above water, man

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 23rd, 2022, 1:41 pm
by EvanLM
Thinker wrote: April 22nd, 2022, 4:03 pm
EvanLM wrote: April 22nd, 2022, 2:18 pm. . . .but they do not recognize them as coming through the HG from Christ . . .

not enough taught us on how to recognize it . . .
I tend to think faith is too important for the Spirit to be as clear as a manual. And “there are many spirits”!
*The spirit of friendship
*The spirit of service
*The spirit of Christmas
*The spirit of contention
*The spirit of gratitude
*The spirit of honesty
*The spirit of hope
…& who knows how many more!

It is said & I believe the soul is more complex & interconnected than our amazingly intelligent body systems. Yet, we are held back in kindergarten lessons in Sunday School. Gotta take the bull by the horns - make it happen. Explore the soul.
sorry to confess this personal weakness. . . but when I decided to repent, I also had to admit that . . sometimes . . the spirt had been speaking to me . . .but I denied it . . . that has to be clear in one's head . . . as well as how to recognize the spirit . . .I mean . . .

IO have to know myself when I am denying the HG like amulek said that the spirit had been calling but he ignored it . . .

so you are right about the bull by the horns . . in all aspects and recognizing all things that could keep us in kindergarten . . not just a few . . . or one,. usually noted in ss . .

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 23rd, 2022, 1:57 pm
by EvanLM
ransomme wrote: April 21st, 2022, 2:52 am
Subcomandante wrote: April 18th, 2022, 5:50 pm
Responding to your (RW's) essay:

Part 1: The Church does not teach to follow the prophet as an exclusionary device but more like follow the prophet because He follows Christ. You follow both. Not one at the expense of the other.

Part 2: What was to become the saving ordinances was not yet finalized when the Wentworth letter was made. This was 1842. Nauvoo's temple was still under construction at the time.

Part 3: Everyone, poor or rich, has been asked to sacrifice their part to building up the Kingdom of God. Jesus appreciated the widow's mite more than many that donated weeks or months' loads of salary because she had given to Jesus everything.

Part 4: The Church does this part quite a bit in the local arena as well as global. It also looks to the future with anticipation because unlike many people on this board, it is quite obvious that the Lord requires a good effort from everyone. Zion's not going to come down like Tinker Bell pixie dust. It will require our consecrated efforts to bring that to pass. The 150 billion dollars is still a proverbial drop in the bucket compared to what Zion will cost in time, effort, and money.

Part 5: There is ample evidence that Joseph Smith did practice polygamy and was sealed to various women. That is a matter of public record. The Book of Mormon did not completely condemn polygamy, but did give one reason why polygamy would be permitted: To raise up seed to the Lord. This is a matter of fact in multiple dispensations. Once the amount of seed has gotten up to a critical mass, then polygamy would no longer be needed, and that's essentially what happened with the modern day Church.

Part 6: You act as if this was the only way. The rest of the post under 6 reads like something I would find out of "The Mormon Worker." No one can be forced into riches. But they can be taught how to work and find marketable skills in order not to be poor any longer. The Church through its self reliance education does its best to fulfill that scripture that there will be no more poor among us. Instead of lamenting and complaining, they take action.

7. That's not like the testimony meetings that I see in my ward, or in several other wards that I have seen. Now, given, where I do see an example like that marked in blue, I see that more often up and down the 15 corridor north of Vegas and south of the Montana border. Outside that, pretty much every testimony meeting I have seen is that which you describe in red.

8. The Church is in NO position to condemn and attack the secret combinations; it is nowhere near strong enough to stand on its own with the world combined against them. Any foolhardy attempt to copy a Captain Moroni style of attack would be met with stiff resistance and humiliating defeat. The best we can hope for today is a Gidgiddoni situation, not making everything public for all to hear, but quietly telling the members what they need to do for the rainy days ahead. And simply, NOT TO PARTICIPATE personally with the secret combos. That will starve them out, little by little. But this will require us uniting with people of other faiths who think similarly about what is going on, which is what the Church is doing here, smartly, intelligently, not rashly.

9. Most pharmaceutical drugs come from herbs. People have known that herbs have distinct medicinal properties, so you have people experienced in organic chemistry that find out how come two very different herbs have similar medicinal properties, and they isolate the chemicals from those herbs to form the pharmaceutical drugs we have today.
Vaccines? Not too much different. Some wise doctor figured out that if you were to give the body a weakened form of a bacteria or a virus, the immune system would be in a much better position to combat it, so that if the real form of the virus or bacteria attacked, the immune system would recognize the threat and stamp it out before it could get a person sick.

Keep in mind that Joseph Smith was very traumatized with the medicine that he received; going through a painful surgery as a young boy and watching his brother get sick and die from a type of medicine that contained mercury, a very poisonous chemical to ingest. Brigham Young, closely acquainted with Joseph Smith, undoubtedly had this in mind when he counseled the Saints these same things, but upon seeing the medical profession becoming full of "gentiles," he wisely sent elders east to learn of medicine and to bring these things back to Utah. Did Brigham fall? No. He learned, and he swallowed his pride.

10. The temples, though beautiful to look on, I could hardly describe as ornate, when comparing to other buildings that I have seen that are quite important in other faiths. Ever seen the national mosques under Islam? Let's not even go to Makkah or Madinah, let's go to Abu Dhabi (picture attached). There's not a single building owned by the Church that even comes to a hundredth of the ornateness or beauty of the Abu Dhabi mosque. Have you seen the cathedrals described as "National Cathedrals" in the different countries of the world under Catholicism or Orthodoxy? Or even those buildings described as local cathedrals. There is a ton more gold inside of the Basilica of Ocotlan in my local city of Tlaxcala, than there is in the Mexico City Temple. And the Basilica of Ocotlan isn't even the most important church in the city of Tlaxcala, population 100k! You do exaggerate much in that part. Perhaps because you are not well-traveled.

11. Different situation, that exhibited in the Book of Mormon versus now. The Book of Mormon you only see two countries. Now we have two hundred, each one with differing definitions on things like rights and freedoms.

12. I'll give you that one, albeit the Book of Mormon referenced the Lamanites who in this dispensation were NEVER prohibited from holding the priesthood. The Africans however were under a different set of restrictions that were employed from the Old Testament of the Bible.

13. Blood Atonement was taught by Brigham, however not taught afterwards, and is condemned by today's Church.

14. Not everyone can handle wine. Not everyone can handle bread either. The Church makes adjustments for both. It would be very interesting to try to impose the wine requirement on those that live in the Muslim countries in the Middle East where wine or any alcohol for that matter is strictly forbidden Good thing the Lord saw that coming.

15. Local meetings continue to be conducted under the Spirit. The General Authorities give their general conference messages under the conduct of the Spirit, preparing anywhere from a few hours to a full six months for their talks.

16. No one denies the gift of prophesy but it must be had in the sphere of influence of the person that is prophesying. No one outside of the FP and Q12 can prophesy to the entire Church and make it binding on the Church to follow. You could have someone from outside the hierarchy come, with the hierarchy's blessing (think Samuel the Lamanite in this case, or Balaam's case in the Old Testament when he refused to curse Israel), but it must come with their blessing. Occasionally you will get an Abinadi moment where someone from outside of the hierarchy comes, but that must be because all the hierarchy has been corrupted, selected by wicked men. We have no evidence of that in the Church today that any one of the 15 (much less all of them) are as the priests of King Noah.

17. This is now done for administrative purposes. But it's not the 12, 14, or 16 year old's fault that they haven't received these types of manifestations. You could have someone the age of a baby receive the manifestation. It all depends on how the work is done at home.

18. The Gospel will be taken from the Gentiles for their consistent insolence and their inability to obey the Gospel because it contradicts their political or social views. Maybe ten years ago, I would have guessed that those called Progmos would be the guys to do it (fall away). But there are many rock-solid members that are falling away too over many trivialities and a lack of proper understanding. If you go down to Latin America, or read the accounts of the Church in Spanish, virtually everyone is following the counsel of the leaders of the Church, with very few dissentions. North of the border, that is a very different story. You just had a Latino and an Asian get called as Apostles, and more and more people from different groups are being called to be General Authorities. The Church is starting to be handed over towards those of Israel as the Americans and Europeans start dwindling in unbelief, just as the scriptures foretold!

19. The Kingdom of God is on the earth today, though not in its fullness. That will come in the Millennium on the Earth.

20. If what you say is true, how come the leaders are constantly calling the members to repentance? How come the members willfully rebel against the Lord when an apostle reminds people about the Plan of Salvation?

To answer your final questions:

The Gentiles are those that came over from the European nations, both members and non-members. Their lot is cast in a bad way unless they repent.

You are not rejected from a chapel for being poor. You will be rejected if you don't follow local health protocols like the wearing of a mask or in countries where they require it, a vaccination certificate. That's not on the Church, however, but on the governments enforcing those regulations.
1. Saying "at the exclusion of" is an overstatement (too extreme in a strawman way). They definitely heavily teach/promote "follow the prophet" and I hear it echoed in the thoughts of many members from different countries (as a sample we have members from at least 27 different countries in my ward). Even to the point "that they were depending on the Prophet, hence were darkened in their minds, in consequence of neglecting the duties devolving upon themselves...” (TPJS p. 238). In other words, they rely to much on following the Prophet rather than developing their own spiritual muscles by seeking Him, trying to hear Him, etc. And stating that they can't lead astray is false doctrine.

2. Who finalizes them? Weren't they finalized back at the foundation of the world? The point was how those things are taught in the BoM vs the change with all of its implications, especially by adding "first". Few things are taught more clearly and consistently as:
"…I must speak concerning the doctrine of Christ;...
Wherefore, do the things which I have told you I have seen that your Lord and your Redeemer should do; for, for this cause have they been shown unto me, that ye might know the gate by which ye should enter. For the gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost.
And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save.
Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life." - 2 Nephi 31:2,17,19,20

3. That is inaccurate, see the tithing thread. Anyhow the widow's mite was really about her heart vs the rich man's heart, and not about everyone has to pay. About their attitudes toward consecration. Then how the stewards use the donations is another ball of wax.

4. Completely wrong, temporally minded. God doesn't need money. What God requires are a broken heart and a contrite spirit. The Gentiles (including the CoJCoLDS) for the greater part will reject the fullness of the Gospel, which is why the Remnant of Jacob will lead the building of New Jerusalem. Also, Zion is not found in buildings, it is found in hearts and minds (broken hears and contrite spirits).

5. Look again. Joseph did not have multiple carnal wives. Joseph and Hyrum up until their deaths worked and spoke out against polygamy.
""A few years ago [May 1869 to April 1870] I obtained the affidavits of as many as I knew of, with a few exceptions, who received personal instructions or commandment from The Prophet respecting the Subject of celestial marriage [,] all of which are filed away in the H.O. [Historian’s Office]…. When the subject first came before my mind I must say I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence, I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the Subject, as connected with the Prophet Joseph himself. There was nothing written and but few living who were personally knowing to the fact that Joseph Taught the principle. True much had been written in support of the Doctrine, bearing upon scriptural-and rational evidences, but not a word, except the Revelation itself. Showing that the The Prophet was the Author-under God…."" (Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, Volume 1: History, Brian C. Hales, p. 9

Not a surprise seeing as how all the "evidence" came from 2nd or 3rd or more hands after Joseph's death and separated in time by up to decades from Joseph.

6. It is the only way in a sense. That is an attribute of Zion, "no poor among them" (Moses 7)

7. It's not about the 15-corridor culture, it is about what is taught from the pulpit by the 15.

8. The Church doesn't need to fight SC's, it's members do. It's hard for members to fight the good fight if the Church is supporting and promoting a number of them.

9. No most pharmaceutical drugs do not come from herbs. What they do is try to come up with synthetic versions so they can patent them.
Vaccines are an interesting concept, but they aren't as effective as they are promoted to be, and they have more adverse effects than are attributed to them.
Saying that BY swallowed his Pride is kinda funny. BY was the epitome of pride and self aggrandizment.

10. Our sanctuaries are indeed very fine, who are you kidding? Besides saying that there are more fine structures is a matter of degree, it's also a Red Herring fallacy.

11. The promised land is a land of liberty for a reason. Teaching a yielding to the enticings of incorrect principles is unbecoming and wrong. You know life is not about being comfortable it should be about the truth: finding it and teaching it. Seek ye first the kingdom of God.

12. Wrong again. You do not understand what darkness means, what God is Love is, what the land of Canaan was and how that is different than Ham's son Canaan, what Cain's, Lamech's and others' curse was, what Cain's mark was, and more.

13. Condemned? Do we have any signs of it being truly condemned? I question this, because that would mean that a prophet can lead us astray.

14. Your arguments here are mostly pointless. Grape juice is wine. New wine is from pressed grapes prior to fermentation. But that's neither here nor there really. The point is the ordinance and not water vs wine or bread vs rice cakes. Personally, I think the sacramental bread should be unleavened just as it was at the Last Supper.

15. There is a difference between prepared words (not that it is always wrong to prepare) and "take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost." (Mark 3:11)

16. He didn't say that others can or should prophesy for the entire Church. The point was that if one receives prophecy the test should not be whether it differs from the words of the current 15. For instance, on multiple occasions, my family and many that I know received clear personal revelation not to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccine despite that going against what the 15 taught on the matter. Were we wrong? Or Is it just because the 15 didn't say that one had to take it but only called it a "godsend" and 'strongly urged' us to take it that this situation doesn't qualify?

17. His argument is that it shouldn't be systematic.

18. Gong is of Asian descent but he is American. And you know it was kind of funny that just the other day my German/Swiss friend made a comment about how American Urchdorf is after living there and being in the 15 for quite a while now. Anyhow it is not isolated to N.A.

19. Actually it will come before the millennium when New Jerusalem is built during the time of tribulation. Just saying.
not sure what 4 means BUT zion will be physically and spiritually built on this the american continent . . . that crap about doing it in your home or the temple or whatever doesn't follow the pattern of a whole city being translated including wicked converts . . . wasn't just one family . . wasn't just temple worshippers . . . they were taught and led by a prophet to build Zion . . . when I read the scriptures . . then . . the Zion that keeps getting pushed by the "brethren" and in this post just do not intellectually match the pattern . . in other words, makes no sense . . .

the purpose of Zion is to provide salvation for large groups of people not just a select family or group . . .sorry . . . God is usually NOT inefficient . . and his true servants are usually not inefficient . . . Enos could have saved his own family if that was the true pattern of Zion . . . ir just himself . . . cuz he had a Zion heart. . . but . . .the true pattern is for 100s to be saved . . . the whole city was translated . . .

sorry . . . again, the kindergarten, less, miraculous approach I see suggested here . . .

and, I think that anyone can certainly build Zion in their heart but . . . there is no evidence in the scriptures that God just saw someone's Zion heart and translated them . . . vs a whole city . . .
there is certainly more to it than just the heart . . .maybe a covenant

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 23rd, 2022, 6:18 pm
by ransomme
EvanLM wrote: April 23rd, 2022, 1:57 pm
ransomme wrote: April 21st, 2022, 2:52 am
Subcomandante wrote: April 18th, 2022, 5:50 pm
Responding to your (RW's) essay:

Part 1: The Church does not teach to follow the prophet as an exclusionary device but more like follow the prophet because He follows Christ. You follow both. Not one at the expense of the other.

Part 2: What was to become the saving ordinances was not yet finalized when the Wentworth letter was made. This was 1842. Nauvoo's temple was still under construction at the time.

Part 3: Everyone, poor or rich, has been asked to sacrifice their part to building up the Kingdom of God. Jesus appreciated the widow's mite more than many that donated weeks or months' loads of salary because she had given to Jesus everything.

Part 4: The Church does this part quite a bit in the local arena as well as global. It also looks to the future with anticipation because unlike many people on this board, it is quite obvious that the Lord requires a good effort from everyone. Zion's not going to come down like Tinker Bell pixie dust. It will require our consecrated efforts to bring that to pass. The 150 billion dollars is still a proverbial drop in the bucket compared to what Zion will cost in time, effort, and money.

Part 5: There is ample evidence that Joseph Smith did practice polygamy and was sealed to various women. That is a matter of public record. The Book of Mormon did not completely condemn polygamy, but did give one reason why polygamy would be permitted: To raise up seed to the Lord. This is a matter of fact in multiple dispensations. Once the amount of seed has gotten up to a critical mass, then polygamy would no longer be needed, and that's essentially what happened with the modern day Church.

Part 6: You act as if this was the only way. The rest of the post under 6 reads like something I would find out of "The Mormon Worker." No one can be forced into riches. But they can be taught how to work and find marketable skills in order not to be poor any longer. The Church through its self reliance education does its best to fulfill that scripture that there will be no more poor among us. Instead of lamenting and complaining, they take action.

7. That's not like the testimony meetings that I see in my ward, or in several other wards that I have seen. Now, given, where I do see an example like that marked in blue, I see that more often up and down the 15 corridor north of Vegas and south of the Montana border. Outside that, pretty much every testimony meeting I have seen is that which you describe in red.

8. The Church is in NO position to condemn and attack the secret combinations; it is nowhere near strong enough to stand on its own with the world combined against them. Any foolhardy attempt to copy a Captain Moroni style of attack would be met with stiff resistance and humiliating defeat. The best we can hope for today is a Gidgiddoni situation, not making everything public for all to hear, but quietly telling the members what they need to do for the rainy days ahead. And simply, NOT TO PARTICIPATE personally with the secret combos. That will starve them out, little by little. But this will require us uniting with people of other faiths who think similarly about what is going on, which is what the Church is doing here, smartly, intelligently, not rashly.

9. Most pharmaceutical drugs come from herbs. People have known that herbs have distinct medicinal properties, so you have people experienced in organic chemistry that find out how come two very different herbs have similar medicinal properties, and they isolate the chemicals from those herbs to form the pharmaceutical drugs we have today.
Vaccines? Not too much different. Some wise doctor figured out that if you were to give the body a weakened form of a bacteria or a virus, the immune system would be in a much better position to combat it, so that if the real form of the virus or bacteria attacked, the immune system would recognize the threat and stamp it out before it could get a person sick.

Keep in mind that Joseph Smith was very traumatized with the medicine that he received; going through a painful surgery as a young boy and watching his brother get sick and die from a type of medicine that contained mercury, a very poisonous chemical to ingest. Brigham Young, closely acquainted with Joseph Smith, undoubtedly had this in mind when he counseled the Saints these same things, but upon seeing the medical profession becoming full of "gentiles," he wisely sent elders east to learn of medicine and to bring these things back to Utah. Did Brigham fall? No. He learned, and he swallowed his pride.

10. The temples, though beautiful to look on, I could hardly describe as ornate, when comparing to other buildings that I have seen that are quite important in other faiths. Ever seen the national mosques under Islam? Let's not even go to Makkah or Madinah, let's go to Abu Dhabi (picture attached). There's not a single building owned by the Church that even comes to a hundredth of the ornateness or beauty of the Abu Dhabi mosque. Have you seen the cathedrals described as "National Cathedrals" in the different countries of the world under Catholicism or Orthodoxy? Or even those buildings described as local cathedrals. There is a ton more gold inside of the Basilica of Ocotlan in my local city of Tlaxcala, than there is in the Mexico City Temple. And the Basilica of Ocotlan isn't even the most important church in the city of Tlaxcala, population 100k! You do exaggerate much in that part. Perhaps because you are not well-traveled.

11. Different situation, that exhibited in the Book of Mormon versus now. The Book of Mormon you only see two countries. Now we have two hundred, each one with differing definitions on things like rights and freedoms.

12. I'll give you that one, albeit the Book of Mormon referenced the Lamanites who in this dispensation were NEVER prohibited from holding the priesthood. The Africans however were under a different set of restrictions that were employed from the Old Testament of the Bible.

13. Blood Atonement was taught by Brigham, however not taught afterwards, and is condemned by today's Church.

14. Not everyone can handle wine. Not everyone can handle bread either. The Church makes adjustments for both. It would be very interesting to try to impose the wine requirement on those that live in the Muslim countries in the Middle East where wine or any alcohol for that matter is strictly forbidden Good thing the Lord saw that coming.

15. Local meetings continue to be conducted under the Spirit. The General Authorities give their general conference messages under the conduct of the Spirit, preparing anywhere from a few hours to a full six months for their talks.

16. No one denies the gift of prophesy but it must be had in the sphere of influence of the person that is prophesying. No one outside of the FP and Q12 can prophesy to the entire Church and make it binding on the Church to follow. You could have someone from outside the hierarchy come, with the hierarchy's blessing (think Samuel the Lamanite in this case, or Balaam's case in the Old Testament when he refused to curse Israel), but it must come with their blessing. Occasionally you will get an Abinadi moment where someone from outside of the hierarchy comes, but that must be because all the hierarchy has been corrupted, selected by wicked men. We have no evidence of that in the Church today that any one of the 15 (much less all of them) are as the priests of King Noah.

17. This is now done for administrative purposes. But it's not the 12, 14, or 16 year old's fault that they haven't received these types of manifestations. You could have someone the age of a baby receive the manifestation. It all depends on how the work is done at home.

18. The Gospel will be taken from the Gentiles for their consistent insolence and their inability to obey the Gospel because it contradicts their political or social views. Maybe ten years ago, I would have guessed that those called Progmos would be the guys to do it (fall away). But there are many rock-solid members that are falling away too over many trivialities and a lack of proper understanding. If you go down to Latin America, or read the accounts of the Church in Spanish, virtually everyone is following the counsel of the leaders of the Church, with very few dissentions. North of the border, that is a very different story. You just had a Latino and an Asian get called as Apostles, and more and more people from different groups are being called to be General Authorities. The Church is starting to be handed over towards those of Israel as the Americans and Europeans start dwindling in unbelief, just as the scriptures foretold!

19. The Kingdom of God is on the earth today, though not in its fullness. That will come in the Millennium on the Earth.

20. If what you say is true, how come the leaders are constantly calling the members to repentance? How come the members willfully rebel against the Lord when an apostle reminds people about the Plan of Salvation?

To answer your final questions:

The Gentiles are those that came over from the European nations, both members and non-members. Their lot is cast in a bad way unless they repent.

You are not rejected from a chapel for being poor. You will be rejected if you don't follow local health protocols like the wearing of a mask or in countries where they require it, a vaccination certificate. That's not on the Church, however, but on the governments enforcing those regulations.
1. Saying "at the exclusion of" is an overstatement (too extreme in a strawman way). They definitely heavily teach/promote "follow the prophet" and I hear it echoed in the thoughts of many members from different countries (as a sample we have members from at least 27 different countries in my ward). Even to the point "that they were depending on the Prophet, hence were darkened in their minds, in consequence of neglecting the duties devolving upon themselves...” (TPJS p. 238). In other words, they rely to much on following the Prophet rather than developing their own spiritual muscles by seeking Him, trying to hear Him, etc. And stating that they can't lead astray is false doctrine.

2. Who finalizes them? Weren't they finalized back at the foundation of the world? The point was how those things are taught in the BoM vs the change with all of its implications, especially by adding "first". Few things are taught more clearly and consistently as:
"…I must speak concerning the doctrine of Christ;...
Wherefore, do the things which I have told you I have seen that your Lord and your Redeemer should do; for, for this cause have they been shown unto me, that ye might know the gate by which ye should enter. For the gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost.
And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save.
Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life." - 2 Nephi 31:2,17,19,20

3. That is inaccurate, see the tithing thread. Anyhow the widow's mite was really about her heart vs the rich man's heart, and not about everyone has to pay. About their attitudes toward consecration. Then how the stewards use the donations is another ball of wax.

4. Completely wrong, temporally minded. God doesn't need money. What God requires are a broken heart and a contrite spirit. The Gentiles (including the CoJCoLDS) for the greater part will reject the fullness of the Gospel, which is why the Remnant of Jacob will lead the building of New Jerusalem. Also, Zion is not found in buildings, it is found in hearts and minds (broken hears and contrite spirits).

5. Look again. Joseph did not have multiple carnal wives. Joseph and Hyrum up until their deaths worked and spoke out against polygamy.
""A few years ago [May 1869 to April 1870] I obtained the affidavits of as many as I knew of, with a few exceptions, who received personal instructions or commandment from The Prophet respecting the Subject of celestial marriage [,] all of which are filed away in the H.O. [Historian’s Office]…. When the subject first came before my mind I must say I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence, I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the Subject, as connected with the Prophet Joseph himself. There was nothing written and but few living who were personally knowing to the fact that Joseph Taught the principle. True much had been written in support of the Doctrine, bearing upon scriptural-and rational evidences, but not a word, except the Revelation itself. Showing that the The Prophet was the Author-under God…."" (Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, Volume 1: History, Brian C. Hales, p. 9

Not a surprise seeing as how all the "evidence" came from 2nd or 3rd or more hands after Joseph's death and separated in time by up to decades from Joseph.

6. It is the only way in a sense. That is an attribute of Zion, "no poor among them" (Moses 7)

7. It's not about the 15-corridor culture, it is about what is taught from the pulpit by the 15.

8. The Church doesn't need to fight SC's, it's members do. It's hard for members to fight the good fight if the Church is supporting and promoting a number of them.

9. No most pharmaceutical drugs do not come from herbs. What they do is try to come up with synthetic versions so they can patent them.
Vaccines are an interesting concept, but they aren't as effective as they are promoted to be, and they have more adverse effects than are attributed to them.
Saying that BY swallowed his Pride is kinda funny. BY was the epitome of pride and self aggrandizment.

10. Our sanctuaries are indeed very fine, who are you kidding? Besides saying that there are more fine structures is a matter of degree, it's also a Red Herring fallacy.

11. The promised land is a land of liberty for a reason. Teaching a yielding to the enticings of incorrect principles is unbecoming and wrong. You know life is not about being comfortable it should be about the truth: finding it and teaching it. Seek ye first the kingdom of God.

12. Wrong again. You do not understand what darkness means, what God is Love is, what the land of Canaan was and how that is different than Ham's son Canaan, what Cain's, Lamech's and others' curse was, what Cain's mark was, and more.

13. Condemned? Do we have any signs of it being truly condemned? I question this, because that would mean that a prophet can lead us astray.

14. Your arguments here are mostly pointless. Grape juice is wine. New wine is from pressed grapes prior to fermentation. But that's neither here nor there really. The point is the ordinance and not water vs wine or bread vs rice cakes. Personally, I think the sacramental bread should be unleavened just as it was at the Last Supper.

15. There is a difference between prepared words (not that it is always wrong to prepare) and "take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost." (Mark 3:11)

16. He didn't say that others can or should prophesy for the entire Church. The point was that if one receives prophecy the test should not be whether it differs from the words of the current 15. For instance, on multiple occasions, my family and many that I know received clear personal revelation not to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccine despite that going against what the 15 taught on the matter. Were we wrong? Or Is it just because the 15 didn't say that one had to take it but only called it a "godsend" and 'strongly urged' us to take it that this situation doesn't qualify?

17. His argument is that it shouldn't be systematic.

18. Gong is of Asian descent but he is American. And you know it was kind of funny that just the other day my German/Swiss friend made a comment about how American Urchdorf is after living there and being in the 15 for quite a while now. Anyhow it is not isolated to N.A.

19. Actually it will come before the millennium when New Jerusalem is built during the time of tribulation. Just saying.
not sure what 4 means BUT zion will be physically and spiritually built on this the american continent . . . that crap about doing it in your home or the temple or whatever doesn't follow the pattern of a whole city being translated including wicked converts . . . wasn't just one family . . wasn't just temple worshippers . . . they were taught and led by a prophet to build Zion . . . when I read the scriptures . . then . . the Zion that keeps getting pushed by the "brethren" and in this post just do not intellectually match the pattern . . in other words, makes no sense . . .

the purpose of Zion is to provide salvation for large groups of people not just a select family or group . . .sorry . . . God is usually NOT inefficient . . and his true servants are usually not inefficient . . . Enos could have saved his own family if that was the true pattern of Zion . . . ir just himself . . . cuz he had a Zion heart. . . but . . .the true pattern is for 100s to be saved . . . the whole city was translated . . .

sorry . . . again, the kindergarten, less, miraculous approach I see suggested here . . .

and, I think that anyone can certainly build Zion in their heart but . . . there is no evidence in the scriptures that God just saw someone's Zion heart and translated them . . . vs a whole city . . .
there is certainly more to it than just the heart . . .maybe a covenant
Yes there are physical locations for Zion as well. The city of Enoch was called Zion. I think The city of Salem under Melchizedek became a Zion. And in the Endtime when New Jerusalem is built, it is to be Zion as well.

The point that I was making of God doesn't need a Church to amass 100 billion plus in funds in today's dollars to build it. Which is a reason the guy I was answering gave for the LDS hoard of wealth. Besides that money is pretty much all digital zeros and ones. Do people think that after tribulations that digital money is going to be there??? 🤣😂🤣

Also I was making the point that a people in a place Ina community become Zion through attaining a certain spiritual level. That's what really qualifies a people/place/community. Zion is based on and achieved through faith and righteousness.

"great was the glory of the Lord, which was upon his people. And the Lord blessed the land, and they were blessed upon the mountains, and upon the high places, and did flourish.

And the Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.

And Enoch continued his preaching in righteousness unto the people of God. And it came to pass in his days, that he built a city that was called the City of Holiness, even Zion."
(Moses 7:17-19)

JST
Gen 14:26 Now Melchizedek was a man of faith, who wrought righteousness; and when a child, he feared God, and stopped the mouths of lions, and quenched the violence of fire.

Gen 14:27 And thus, having been approved of God, he was ordained a high priest after the order of the covenant which God made with Enoch,

Gen 14:28 It being after the order of the Son of God, which order came not by man, nor the will of man, neither by father nor mother, neither by beginning of days nor end of years, but of God.

Gen 14:29 And it was delivered unto men by the calling of his own voice, according to his own will, unto as many as believed on his name--

Gen 14:30 For God, having sworn unto Enoch and unto his seed with an oath by himself that everyone being ordained after this order and calling should have power, by faith, to break mountains, to divide the seas, to dry up waters, to turn them out of their course,

Gen 14:31 To put at defiance the armies of nations, to divide the earth, to break every band, to stand in the presence of God, to do all things according to his will, according to his command, subdue principalities and powers; and this by the will of the Son of God which was from before the foundation of the world.

Gen 14:32 And men having this faith, coming up unto this order of God, were translated and taken up into heaven.

Gen 14:33 And now, Melchizedek was a priest of this order; therefore, he obtained peace in Salem and was called the prince of peace.

Gen 14:34 And his people wrought righteousness, and obtained heaven, and sought for the city of Enoch which God had before taken, separating it from the earth, having reserved it unto the latter days, or the end of the world,

Gen 14:35 And hath said, and sworn with an oath, that the heavens and the earth should come together and the sons of God should be tried so as by fire.

Gen 14:36 And this Melchizedek, having thus established righteousness, was called the king of heaven by his people, or, in other words, the king of peace.

Gen 14:37 And he lifted up his voice, and he blessed Abram, being the high priest and the keeper of the storehouse of God,

Gen 14:38 Him whom God had appointed to receive tithes for the poor.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 23rd, 2022, 6:55 pm
by Subcomandante
ransomme wrote: April 23rd, 2022, 6:18 pm
EvanLM wrote: April 23rd, 2022, 1:57 pm
ransomme wrote: April 21st, 2022, 2:52 am
Subcomandante wrote: April 18th, 2022, 5:50 pm
Responding to your (RW's) essay:

Part 1: The Church does not teach to follow the prophet as an exclusionary device but more like follow the prophet because He follows Christ. You follow both. Not one at the expense of the other.

Part 2: What was to become the saving ordinances was not yet finalized when the Wentworth letter was made. This was 1842. Nauvoo's temple was still under construction at the time.

Part 3: Everyone, poor or rich, has been asked to sacrifice their part to building up the Kingdom of God. Jesus appreciated the widow's mite more than many that donated weeks or months' loads of salary because she had given to Jesus everything.

Part 4: The Church does this part quite a bit in the local arena as well as global. It also looks to the future with anticipation because unlike many people on this board, it is quite obvious that the Lord requires a good effort from everyone. Zion's not going to come down like Tinker Bell pixie dust. It will require our consecrated efforts to bring that to pass. The 150 billion dollars is still a proverbial drop in the bucket compared to what Zion will cost in time, effort, and money.

Part 5: There is ample evidence that Joseph Smith did practice polygamy and was sealed to various women. That is a matter of public record. The Book of Mormon did not completely condemn polygamy, but did give one reason why polygamy would be permitted: To raise up seed to the Lord. This is a matter of fact in multiple dispensations. Once the amount of seed has gotten up to a critical mass, then polygamy would no longer be needed, and that's essentially what happened with the modern day Church.

Part 6: You act as if this was the only way. The rest of the post under 6 reads like something I would find out of "The Mormon Worker." No one can be forced into riches. But they can be taught how to work and find marketable skills in order not to be poor any longer. The Church through its self reliance education does its best to fulfill that scripture that there will be no more poor among us. Instead of lamenting and complaining, they take action.

7. That's not like the testimony meetings that I see in my ward, or in several other wards that I have seen. Now, given, where I do see an example like that marked in blue, I see that more often up and down the 15 corridor north of Vegas and south of the Montana border. Outside that, pretty much every testimony meeting I have seen is that which you describe in red.

8. The Church is in NO position to condemn and attack the secret combinations; it is nowhere near strong enough to stand on its own with the world combined against them. Any foolhardy attempt to copy a Captain Moroni style of attack would be met with stiff resistance and humiliating defeat. The best we can hope for today is a Gidgiddoni situation, not making everything public for all to hear, but quietly telling the members what they need to do for the rainy days ahead. And simply, NOT TO PARTICIPATE personally with the secret combos. That will starve them out, little by little. But this will require us uniting with people of other faiths who think similarly about what is going on, which is what the Church is doing here, smartly, intelligently, not rashly.

9. Most pharmaceutical drugs come from herbs. People have known that herbs have distinct medicinal properties, so you have people experienced in organic chemistry that find out how come two very different herbs have similar medicinal properties, and they isolate the chemicals from those herbs to form the pharmaceutical drugs we have today.
Vaccines? Not too much different. Some wise doctor figured out that if you were to give the body a weakened form of a bacteria or a virus, the immune system would be in a much better position to combat it, so that if the real form of the virus or bacteria attacked, the immune system would recognize the threat and stamp it out before it could get a person sick.

Keep in mind that Joseph Smith was very traumatized with the medicine that he received; going through a painful surgery as a young boy and watching his brother get sick and die from a type of medicine that contained mercury, a very poisonous chemical to ingest. Brigham Young, closely acquainted with Joseph Smith, undoubtedly had this in mind when he counseled the Saints these same things, but upon seeing the medical profession becoming full of "gentiles," he wisely sent elders east to learn of medicine and to bring these things back to Utah. Did Brigham fall? No. He learned, and he swallowed his pride.

10. The temples, though beautiful to look on, I could hardly describe as ornate, when comparing to other buildings that I have seen that are quite important in other faiths. Ever seen the national mosques under Islam? Let's not even go to Makkah or Madinah, let's go to Abu Dhabi (picture attached). There's not a single building owned by the Church that even comes to a hundredth of the ornateness or beauty of the Abu Dhabi mosque. Have you seen the cathedrals described as "National Cathedrals" in the different countries of the world under Catholicism or Orthodoxy? Or even those buildings described as local cathedrals. There is a ton more gold inside of the Basilica of Ocotlan in my local city of Tlaxcala, than there is in the Mexico City Temple. And the Basilica of Ocotlan isn't even the most important church in the city of Tlaxcala, population 100k! You do exaggerate much in that part. Perhaps because you are not well-traveled.

11. Different situation, that exhibited in the Book of Mormon versus now. The Book of Mormon you only see two countries. Now we have two hundred, each one with differing definitions on things like rights and freedoms.

12. I'll give you that one, albeit the Book of Mormon referenced the Lamanites who in this dispensation were NEVER prohibited from holding the priesthood. The Africans however were under a different set of restrictions that were employed from the Old Testament of the Bible.

13. Blood Atonement was taught by Brigham, however not taught afterwards, and is condemned by today's Church.

14. Not everyone can handle wine. Not everyone can handle bread either. The Church makes adjustments for both. It would be very interesting to try to impose the wine requirement on those that live in the Muslim countries in the Middle East where wine or any alcohol for that matter is strictly forbidden Good thing the Lord saw that coming.

15. Local meetings continue to be conducted under the Spirit. The General Authorities give their general conference messages under the conduct of the Spirit, preparing anywhere from a few hours to a full six months for their talks.

16. No one denies the gift of prophesy but it must be had in the sphere of influence of the person that is prophesying. No one outside of the FP and Q12 can prophesy to the entire Church and make it binding on the Church to follow. You could have someone from outside the hierarchy come, with the hierarchy's blessing (think Samuel the Lamanite in this case, or Balaam's case in the Old Testament when he refused to curse Israel), but it must come with their blessing. Occasionally you will get an Abinadi moment where someone from outside of the hierarchy comes, but that must be because all the hierarchy has been corrupted, selected by wicked men. We have no evidence of that in the Church today that any one of the 15 (much less all of them) are as the priests of King Noah.

17. This is now done for administrative purposes. But it's not the 12, 14, or 16 year old's fault that they haven't received these types of manifestations. You could have someone the age of a baby receive the manifestation. It all depends on how the work is done at home.

18. The Gospel will be taken from the Gentiles for their consistent insolence and their inability to obey the Gospel because it contradicts their political or social views. Maybe ten years ago, I would have guessed that those called Progmos would be the guys to do it (fall away). But there are many rock-solid members that are falling away too over many trivialities and a lack of proper understanding. If you go down to Latin America, or read the accounts of the Church in Spanish, virtually everyone is following the counsel of the leaders of the Church, with very few dissentions. North of the border, that is a very different story. You just had a Latino and an Asian get called as Apostles, and more and more people from different groups are being called to be General Authorities. The Church is starting to be handed over towards those of Israel as the Americans and Europeans start dwindling in unbelief, just as the scriptures foretold!

19. The Kingdom of God is on the earth today, though not in its fullness. That will come in the Millennium on the Earth.

20. If what you say is true, how come the leaders are constantly calling the members to repentance? How come the members willfully rebel against the Lord when an apostle reminds people about the Plan of Salvation?

To answer your final questions:

The Gentiles are those that came over from the European nations, both members and non-members. Their lot is cast in a bad way unless they repent.

You are not rejected from a chapel for being poor. You will be rejected if you don't follow local health protocols like the wearing of a mask or in countries where they require it, a vaccination certificate. That's not on the Church, however, but on the governments enforcing those regulations.
1. Saying "at the exclusion of" is an overstatement (too extreme in a strawman way). They definitely heavily teach/promote "follow the prophet" and I hear it echoed in the thoughts of many members from different countries (as a sample we have members from at least 27 different countries in my ward). Even to the point "that they were depending on the Prophet, hence were darkened in their minds, in consequence of neglecting the duties devolving upon themselves...” (TPJS p. 238). In other words, they rely to much on following the Prophet rather than developing their own spiritual muscles by seeking Him, trying to hear Him, etc. And stating that they can't lead astray is false doctrine.

2. Who finalizes them? Weren't they finalized back at the foundation of the world? The point was how those things are taught in the BoM vs the change with all of its implications, especially by adding "first". Few things are taught more clearly and consistently as:
"…I must speak concerning the doctrine of Christ;...
Wherefore, do the things which I have told you I have seen that your Lord and your Redeemer should do; for, for this cause have they been shown unto me, that ye might know the gate by which ye should enter. For the gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost.
And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save.
Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life." - 2 Nephi 31:2,17,19,20

3. That is inaccurate, see the tithing thread. Anyhow the widow's mite was really about her heart vs the rich man's heart, and not about everyone has to pay. About their attitudes toward consecration. Then how the stewards use the donations is another ball of wax.

4. Completely wrong, temporally minded. God doesn't need money. What God requires are a broken heart and a contrite spirit. The Gentiles (including the CoJCoLDS) for the greater part will reject the fullness of the Gospel, which is why the Remnant of Jacob will lead the building of New Jerusalem. Also, Zion is not found in buildings, it is found in hearts and minds (broken hears and contrite spirits).

5. Look again. Joseph did not have multiple carnal wives. Joseph and Hyrum up until their deaths worked and spoke out against polygamy.
""A few years ago [May 1869 to April 1870] I obtained the affidavits of as many as I knew of, with a few exceptions, who received personal instructions or commandment from The Prophet respecting the Subject of celestial marriage [,] all of which are filed away in the H.O. [Historian’s Office]…. When the subject first came before my mind I must say I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence, I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the Subject, as connected with the Prophet Joseph himself. There was nothing written and but few living who were personally knowing to the fact that Joseph Taught the principle. True much had been written in support of the Doctrine, bearing upon scriptural-and rational evidences, but not a word, except the Revelation itself. Showing that the The Prophet was the Author-under God…."" (Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, Volume 1: History, Brian C. Hales, p. 9

Not a surprise seeing as how all the "evidence" came from 2nd or 3rd or more hands after Joseph's death and separated in time by up to decades from Joseph.

6. It is the only way in a sense. That is an attribute of Zion, "no poor among them" (Moses 7)

7. It's not about the 15-corridor culture, it is about what is taught from the pulpit by the 15.

8. The Church doesn't need to fight SC's, it's members do. It's hard for members to fight the good fight if the Church is supporting and promoting a number of them.

9. No most pharmaceutical drugs do not come from herbs. What they do is try to come up with synthetic versions so they can patent them.
Vaccines are an interesting concept, but they aren't as effective as they are promoted to be, and they have more adverse effects than are attributed to them.
Saying that BY swallowed his Pride is kinda funny. BY was the epitome of pride and self aggrandizment.

10. Our sanctuaries are indeed very fine, who are you kidding? Besides saying that there are more fine structures is a matter of degree, it's also a Red Herring fallacy.

11. The promised land is a land of liberty for a reason. Teaching a yielding to the enticings of incorrect principles is unbecoming and wrong. You know life is not about being comfortable it should be about the truth: finding it and teaching it. Seek ye first the kingdom of God.

12. Wrong again. You do not understand what darkness means, what God is Love is, what the land of Canaan was and how that is different than Ham's son Canaan, what Cain's, Lamech's and others' curse was, what Cain's mark was, and more.

13. Condemned? Do we have any signs of it being truly condemned? I question this, because that would mean that a prophet can lead us astray.

14. Your arguments here are mostly pointless. Grape juice is wine. New wine is from pressed grapes prior to fermentation. But that's neither here nor there really. The point is the ordinance and not water vs wine or bread vs rice cakes. Personally, I think the sacramental bread should be unleavened just as it was at the Last Supper.

15. There is a difference between prepared words (not that it is always wrong to prepare) and "take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost." (Mark 3:11)

16. He didn't say that others can or should prophesy for the entire Church. The point was that if one receives prophecy the test should not be whether it differs from the words of the current 15. For instance, on multiple occasions, my family and many that I know received clear personal revelation not to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccine despite that going against what the 15 taught on the matter. Were we wrong? Or Is it just because the 15 didn't say that one had to take it but only called it a "godsend" and 'strongly urged' us to take it that this situation doesn't qualify?

17. His argument is that it shouldn't be systematic.

18. Gong is of Asian descent but he is American. And you know it was kind of funny that just the other day my German/Swiss friend made a comment about how American Urchdorf is after living there and being in the 15 for quite a while now. Anyhow it is not isolated to N.A.

19. Actually it will come before the millennium when New Jerusalem is built during the time of tribulation. Just saying.
not sure what 4 means BUT zion will be physically and spiritually built on this the american continent . . . that crap about doing it in your home or the temple or whatever doesn't follow the pattern of a whole city being translated including wicked converts . . . wasn't just one family . . wasn't just temple worshippers . . . they were taught and led by a prophet to build Zion . . . when I read the scriptures . . then . . the Zion that keeps getting pushed by the "brethren" and in this post just do not intellectually match the pattern . . in other words, makes no sense . . .

the purpose of Zion is to provide salvation for large groups of people not just a select family or group . . .sorry . . . God is usually NOT inefficient . . and his true servants are usually not inefficient . . . Enos could have saved his own family if that was the true pattern of Zion . . . ir just himself . . . cuz he had a Zion heart. . . but . . .the true pattern is for 100s to be saved . . . the whole city was translated . . .

sorry . . . again, the kindergarten, less, miraculous approach I see suggested here . . .

and, I think that anyone can certainly build Zion in their heart but . . . there is no evidence in the scriptures that God just saw someone's Zion heart and translated them . . . vs a whole city . . .
there is certainly more to it than just the heart . . .maybe a covenant
Yes there are physical locations for Zion as well. The city of Enoch was called Zion. I think The city of Salem under Melchizedek became a Zion. And in the Endtime when New Jerusalem is built, it is to be Zion as well.

The point that I was making of God doesn't need a Church to amass 100 billion plus in funds in today's dollars to build it. Which is a reason the guy I was answering gave for the LDS hoard of wealth. Besides that money is pretty much all digital zeros and ones. Do people think that after tribulations that digital money is going to be there??? 🤣😂🤣

Also I was making the point that a people in a place Ina community become Zion through attaining a certain spiritual level. That's what really qualifies a people/place/community. Zion is based on and achieved through faith and righteousness.

"great was the glory of the Lord, which was upon his people. And the Lord blessed the land, and they were blessed upon the mountains, and upon the high places, and did flourish.

And the Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.

And Enoch continued his preaching in righteousness unto the people of God. And it came to pass in his days, that he built a city that was called the City of Holiness, even Zion."
(Moses 7:17-19)

JST
Gen 14:26 Now Melchizedek was a man of faith, who wrought righteousness; and when a child, he feared God, and stopped the mouths of lions, and quenched the violence of fire.

Gen 14:27 And thus, having been approved of God, he was ordained a high priest after the order of the covenant which God made with Enoch,

Gen 14:28 It being after the order of the Son of God, which order came not by man, nor the will of man, neither by father nor mother, neither by beginning of days nor end of years, but of God.

Gen 14:29 And it was delivered unto men by the calling of his own voice, according to his own will, unto as many as believed on his name--

Gen 14:30 For God, having sworn unto Enoch and unto his seed with an oath by himself that everyone being ordained after this order and calling should have power, by faith, to break mountains, to divide the seas, to dry up waters, to turn them out of their course,

Gen 14:31 To put at defiance the armies of nations, to divide the earth, to break every band, to stand in the presence of God, to do all things according to his will, according to his command, subdue principalities and powers; and this by the will of the Son of God which was from before the foundation of the world.

Gen 14:32 And men having this faith, coming up unto this order of God, were translated and taken up into heaven.

Gen 14:33 And now, Melchizedek was a priest of this order; therefore, he obtained peace in Salem and was called the prince of peace.

Gen 14:34 And his people wrought righteousness, and obtained heaven, and sought for the city of Enoch which God had before taken, separating it from the earth, having reserved it unto the latter days, or the end of the world,

Gen 14:35 And hath said, and sworn with an oath, that the heavens and the earth should come together and the sons of God should be tried so as by fire.

Gen 14:36 And this Melchizedek, having thus established righteousness, was called the king of heaven by his people, or, in other words, the king of peace.

Gen 14:37 And he lifted up his voice, and he blessed Abram, being the high priest and the keeper of the storehouse of God,

Gen 14:38 Him whom God had appointed to receive tithes for the poor.
Enoch and Melchisedek (and to a smaller degree the Nephites after Christ) all had Zion societies. The Nephites tried for nearly 200 years but ultimately failed. Enoch and Melchisedek if we look at the years they had as literal, had to wait even more time. Especially if Melchisedek is Shem as a few sages have surmised. Shem lived all the way from the flood clear down to Abraham.

Re: TBM - "when they realize the evil they defended ....

Posted: April 23rd, 2022, 7:22 pm
by ransomme
Subcomandante wrote: April 23rd, 2022, 6:55 pm
ransomme wrote: April 23rd, 2022, 6:18 pm
EvanLM wrote: April 23rd, 2022, 1:57 pm
ransomme wrote: April 21st, 2022, 2:52 am
1. Saying "at the exclusion of" is an overstatement (too extreme in a strawman way). They definitely heavily teach/promote "follow the prophet" and I hear it echoed in the thoughts of many members from different countries (as a sample we have members from at least 27 different countries in my ward). Even to the point "that they were depending on the Prophet, hence were darkened in their minds, in consequence of neglecting the duties devolving upon themselves...” (TPJS p. 238). In other words, they rely to much on following the Prophet rather than developing their own spiritual muscles by seeking Him, trying to hear Him, etc. And stating that they can't lead astray is false doctrine.

2. Who finalizes them? Weren't they finalized back at the foundation of the world? The point was how those things are taught in the BoM vs the change with all of its implications, especially by adding "first". Few things are taught more clearly and consistently as:
"…I must speak concerning the doctrine of Christ;...
Wherefore, do the things which I have told you I have seen that your Lord and your Redeemer should do; for, for this cause have they been shown unto me, that ye might know the gate by which ye should enter. For the gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost.
And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save.
Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life." - 2 Nephi 31:2,17,19,20

3. That is inaccurate, see the tithing thread. Anyhow the widow's mite was really about her heart vs the rich man's heart, and not about everyone has to pay. About their attitudes toward consecration. Then how the stewards use the donations is another ball of wax.

4. Completely wrong, temporally minded. God doesn't need money. What God requires are a broken heart and a contrite spirit. The Gentiles (including the CoJCoLDS) for the greater part will reject the fullness of the Gospel, which is why the Remnant of Jacob will lead the building of New Jerusalem. Also, Zion is not found in buildings, it is found in hearts and minds (broken hears and contrite spirits).

5. Look again. Joseph did not have multiple carnal wives. Joseph and Hyrum up until their deaths worked and spoke out against polygamy.
""A few years ago [May 1869 to April 1870] I obtained the affidavits of as many as I knew of, with a few exceptions, who received personal instructions or commandment from The Prophet respecting the Subject of celestial marriage [,] all of which are filed away in the H.O. [Historian’s Office]…. When the subject first came before my mind I must say I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence, I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the Subject, as connected with the Prophet Joseph himself. There was nothing written and but few living who were personally knowing to the fact that Joseph Taught the principle. True much had been written in support of the Doctrine, bearing upon scriptural-and rational evidences, but not a word, except the Revelation itself. Showing that the The Prophet was the Author-under God…."" (Joseph Smith’s Polygamy, Volume 1: History, Brian C. Hales, p. 9

Not a surprise seeing as how all the "evidence" came from 2nd or 3rd or more hands after Joseph's death and separated in time by up to decades from Joseph.

6. It is the only way in a sense. That is an attribute of Zion, "no poor among them" (Moses 7)

7. It's not about the 15-corridor culture, it is about what is taught from the pulpit by the 15.

8. The Church doesn't need to fight SC's, it's members do. It's hard for members to fight the good fight if the Church is supporting and promoting a number of them.

9. No most pharmaceutical drugs do not come from herbs. What they do is try to come up with synthetic versions so they can patent them.
Vaccines are an interesting concept, but they aren't as effective as they are promoted to be, and they have more adverse effects than are attributed to them.
Saying that BY swallowed his Pride is kinda funny. BY was the epitome of pride and self aggrandizment.

10. Our sanctuaries are indeed very fine, who are you kidding? Besides saying that there are more fine structures is a matter of degree, it's also a Red Herring fallacy.

11. The promised land is a land of liberty for a reason. Teaching a yielding to the enticings of incorrect principles is unbecoming and wrong. You know life is not about being comfortable it should be about the truth: finding it and teaching it. Seek ye first the kingdom of God.

12. Wrong again. You do not understand what darkness means, what God is Love is, what the land of Canaan was and how that is different than Ham's son Canaan, what Cain's, Lamech's and others' curse was, what Cain's mark was, and more.

13. Condemned? Do we have any signs of it being truly condemned? I question this, because that would mean that a prophet can lead us astray.

14. Your arguments here are mostly pointless. Grape juice is wine. New wine is from pressed grapes prior to fermentation. But that's neither here nor there really. The point is the ordinance and not water vs wine or bread vs rice cakes. Personally, I think the sacramental bread should be unleavened just as it was at the Last Supper.

15. There is a difference between prepared words (not that it is always wrong to prepare) and "take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost." (Mark 3:11)

16. He didn't say that others can or should prophesy for the entire Church. The point was that if one receives prophecy the test should not be whether it differs from the words of the current 15. For instance, on multiple occasions, my family and many that I know received clear personal revelation not to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccine despite that going against what the 15 taught on the matter. Were we wrong? Or Is it just because the 15 didn't say that one had to take it but only called it a "godsend" and 'strongly urged' us to take it that this situation doesn't qualify?

17. His argument is that it shouldn't be systematic.

18. Gong is of Asian descent but he is American. And you know it was kind of funny that just the other day my German/Swiss friend made a comment about how American Urchdorf is after living there and being in the 15 for quite a while now. Anyhow it is not isolated to N.A.

19. Actually it will come before the millennium when New Jerusalem is built during the time of tribulation. Just saying.
not sure what 4 means BUT zion will be physically and spiritually built on this the american continent . . . that crap about doing it in your home or the temple or whatever doesn't follow the pattern of a whole city being translated including wicked converts . . . wasn't just one family . . wasn't just temple worshippers . . . they were taught and led by a prophet to build Zion . . . when I read the scriptures . . then . . the Zion that keeps getting pushed by the "brethren" and in this post just do not intellectually match the pattern . . in other words, makes no sense . . .

the purpose of Zion is to provide salvation for large groups of people not just a select family or group . . .sorry . . . God is usually NOT inefficient . . and his true servants are usually not inefficient . . . Enos could have saved his own family if that was the true pattern of Zion . . . ir just himself . . . cuz he had a Zion heart. . . but . . .the true pattern is for 100s to be saved . . . the whole city was translated . . .

sorry . . . again, the kindergarten, less, miraculous approach I see suggested here . . .

and, I think that anyone can certainly build Zion in their heart but . . . there is no evidence in the scriptures that God just saw someone's Zion heart and translated them . . . vs a whole city . . .
there is certainly more to it than just the heart . . .maybe a covenant
Yes there are physical locations for Zion as well. The city of Enoch was called Zion. I think The city of Salem under Melchizedek became a Zion. And in the Endtime when New Jerusalem is built, it is to be Zion as well.

The point that I was making of God doesn't need a Church to amass 100 billion plus in funds in today's dollars to build it. Which is a reason the guy I was answering gave for the LDS hoard of wealth. Besides that money is pretty much all digital zeros and ones. Do people think that after tribulations that digital money is going to be there??? 🤣😂🤣

Also I was making the point that a people in a place Ina community become Zion through attaining a certain spiritual level. That's what really qualifies a people/place/community. Zion is based on and achieved through faith and righteousness.

"great was the glory of the Lord, which was upon his people. And the Lord blessed the land, and they were blessed upon the mountains, and upon the high places, and did flourish.

And the Lord called his people Zion, because they were of one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness; and there was no poor among them.

And Enoch continued his preaching in righteousness unto the people of God. And it came to pass in his days, that he built a city that was called the City of Holiness, even Zion."
(Moses 7:17-19)

JST
Gen 14:26 Now Melchizedek was a man of faith, who wrought righteousness; and when a child, he feared God, and stopped the mouths of lions, and quenched the violence of fire.

Gen 14:27 And thus, having been approved of God, he was ordained a high priest after the order of the covenant which God made with Enoch,

Gen 14:28 It being after the order of the Son of God, which order came not by man, nor the will of man, neither by father nor mother, neither by beginning of days nor end of years, but of God.

Gen 14:29 And it was delivered unto men by the calling of his own voice, according to his own will, unto as many as believed on his name--

Gen 14:30 For God, having sworn unto Enoch and unto his seed with an oath by himself that everyone being ordained after this order and calling should have power, by faith, to break mountains, to divide the seas, to dry up waters, to turn them out of their course,

Gen 14:31 To put at defiance the armies of nations, to divide the earth, to break every band, to stand in the presence of God, to do all things according to his will, according to his command, subdue principalities and powers; and this by the will of the Son of God which was from before the foundation of the world.

Gen 14:32 And men having this faith, coming up unto this order of God, were translated and taken up into heaven.

Gen 14:33 And now, Melchizedek was a priest of this order; therefore, he obtained peace in Salem and was called the prince of peace.

Gen 14:34 And his people wrought righteousness, and obtained heaven, and sought for the city of Enoch which God had before taken, separating it from the earth, having reserved it unto the latter days, or the end of the world,

Gen 14:35 And hath said, and sworn with an oath, that the heavens and the earth should come together and the sons of God should be tried so as by fire.

Gen 14:36 And this Melchizedek, having thus established righteousness, was called the king of heaven by his people, or, in other words, the king of peace.

Gen 14:37 And he lifted up his voice, and he blessed Abram, being the high priest and the keeper of the storehouse of God,

Gen 14:38 Him whom God had appointed to receive tithes for the poor.
Enoch and Melchisedek (and to a smaller degree the Nephites after Christ) all had Zion societies. The Nephites tried for nearly 200 years but ultimately failed. Enoch and Melchisedek if we look at the years they had as literal, had to wait even more time. Especially if Melchisedek is Shem as a few sages have surmised. Shem lived all the way from the flood clear down to Abraham.
True Zion wasn't built In a day. But that is one of the purposes of the intensity of the tribulations:

"These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb." (Revelation 7:14)

But we should not put off the day off our spiritual preparation. Seek now after faith and righteousness. For every step of progress that we attain now, the better off we will be in the times to come.