Atticus wrote: ↑March 29th, 2022, 9:59 am
Niemand wrote: ↑March 29th, 2022, 8:31 am
You're not very good with definitions are you?
I used paranoia and conspiracy theory correctly.
But since you seem to think I'm not very good with definitions, maybe you can define these two terms for me: ad hominem and red herring
You employed both to create a distraction in order to avoid addressing the actual topic of our discussion, which is your false accusation against Kimball over his list.
You used neither correctly, and once again you're posting around the same time as Artaxerxes.
It would be quite fun to compare your posting times. That would be another piece of evidence. Unfortunately, I'll need to put in quite a bit of work to do that. If I was more of a geek, I could put this into a few graphs etc. We can do a bit of basic number crunching here.
Your sign up dates are about a month apart. Not really a smoking gun:
Atticus - September 18th, 2021, 10:36 pm
Artaxerxes - October 24th, 2021, 4:24 pm
Artaxerxes is a much less frequent poster than you, and comes in very roughly 1/3 of your postings. Nothing wrong with that either.
But it seems you lads do have a bit of an overlapping schedule (The times listed are all based on my local timezone not yours, and are in reverse order, apologies.)
Today (Tuesday, 29th March)
Atticus -
4:59 pm, 3:00 pm, 2:42 pm, 12:05 am
Artaxerxes -
5:16 pm
Yesterday (Monday, 28th March) - bit of an active day for both of you.
Atticus -
8:48 pm, 4:25 pm, 3:01 pm, 2:50 pm, 2:48 pm, 1:39 pm ,
6:39 am,
6:25 am,
5:39 am, 4:05 am
Artaxerxes -
8:09 pm, [Evening, afternoon, and late morning] 8:27 am,
6:06 am
The day before yesterday (Sunday, 27th March) - both resting on the Sabbath
Atticus -
2:51 am, 1:27 am
Artaxerxes 2:56 am
The day before that (Saturday, 26th March) - Very active day in Persia, pretty quiet in Attica.
Atticus - 11:21 pm,
10:48 pm, 10:01 pm
Artaxerxes-
10:29 pm, 10:21 pm, 10:14 pm, 7:16 pm, 7:04 pm, 6:59 pm - 5.20pm (a number of postings), 3.55pm-2.47 (a burst of postings), 12:42 am, 12:17 am
Yeah, this is just a conspiracy theory. Don't worry, I've taken screen shots of your posting pages, so there's no jiggery pokery. I've attached a couple of these.
maybe you can define these two terms for me: ad hominem and red herring
To the man, and a rare fish. But if you're in a court of law, like your namesake, Mr Finch, then you have to make personal defences, and your character will be up for debate, so it's not really
ad hominem. You can't really say to the judge that the case is "ad hominem" if you are the accused. If you were seen hanging around at the same time as the other individual, you don't have a leg to stand on
There is no "false accusation" about Kimball. It's a very real accusation which others have made. In fact, he himself regretted some of the content of the book, and I believe he would have rewritten the thing in another life. However, LDS leaders are notorious for not apologising or backing down over anything. The usual tactic is just to get the next president to change things, or work by increments.