Page 3 of 5

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 10:39 am
by Thinker
Robin Hood wrote: March 25th, 2022, 9:15 am I think it was a product of it's time, and of Bro. Kimball's anxiety about the state of the church, meaning the condition of the Saints.
Rightly or wrongly, apostles only tend to deal with ordinary members when there is a problem. And if it gets up as far as the apostles it's a big problem... a very big one.
So Bro. Kimball will be dealing with murder cases, incest, paedophilia and other sexual perversions, industrial scale corruption, drug addiction, prostitution and so on. For a farm boy from Arizona it must have been a real eye opener to realise what a wicked world it is out there, and the toll it is taking on God's people. He is dealing with very serious issues and he feels the need to write the equivalent of a fire and brimstone sermon in order to shake the Saints and wake them up to the seriousness of sin and the depths to which sin can plunge us.
Good points.
It also suggests “physician heal thyself” before trying to help others. Eg., Kimball seemed to not realize those most likely to read his book were probably not those he had in mind when writing it. Even if they were, shame is discouraging not encouraging desired behavioral change.

(Bear your cross: https://youtu.be/-IejKIjC6hw)

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 10:50 am
by ransomme
iWriteStuff wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:26 am
bjornagain wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:23 am
iWriteStuff wrote: March 24th, 2022, 12:59 pm But what about Cain/Sasquatch and masturbation leading to homosexuality? Those were great doctrines!
I absolutely believe both of these doctrines.
You're free to believe whatever you want. I remain a bit skeptical, but there's no harm in believing something if it keeps you from sin.
which humor was more dry? more sarcastic?

I had a copy of MoF in my parent's home from as far back as I can remember. I always wanted to read it because of the title, but always felt repelled when it came down to cracking it open.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 12:45 pm
by iWriteStuff
ransomme wrote: March 26th, 2022, 10:50 am
iWriteStuff wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:26 am
bjornagain wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:23 am
iWriteStuff wrote: March 24th, 2022, 12:59 pm But what about Cain/Sasquatch and masturbation leading to homosexuality? Those were great doctrines!
I absolutely believe both of these doctrines.
You're free to believe whatever you want. I remain a bit skeptical, but there's no harm in believing something if it keeps you from sin.
which humor was more dry? more sarcastic?

I had a copy of MoF in my parent's home from as far back as I can remember. I always wanted to read it because of the title, but always felt repelled when it came down to cracking it open.
Haha well if that was humor it went right over my head. I have no doubt there are some people who actually believe both those theories.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 2:07 pm
by ransomme
iWriteStuff wrote: March 26th, 2022, 12:45 pm
ransomme wrote: March 26th, 2022, 10:50 am
iWriteStuff wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:26 am
bjornagain wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:23 am

I absolutely believe both of these doctrines.
You're free to believe whatever you want. I remain a bit skeptical, but there's no harm in believing something if it keeps you from sin.
which humor was more dry? more sarcastic?

I had a copy of MoF in my parent's home from as far back as I can remember. I always wanted to read it because of the title, but always felt repelled when it came down to cracking it open.
Haha well if that was humor it went right over my head. I have no doubt there are some people who actually believe both those theories.
yeah as a child/youth the Cain/Big Foot story was great Mormon folklore

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 2:14 pm
by Niemand
ransomme wrote: March 26th, 2022, 2:07 pm
iWriteStuff wrote: March 26th, 2022, 12:45 pm
ransomme wrote: March 26th, 2022, 10:50 am
iWriteStuff wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:26 am

You're free to believe whatever you want. I remain a bit skeptical, but there's no harm in believing something if it keeps you from sin.
which humor was more dry? more sarcastic?

I had a copy of MoF in my parent's home from as far back as I can remember. I always wanted to read it because of the title, but always felt repelled when it came down to cracking it open.
Haha well if that was humor it went right over my head. I have no doubt there are some people who actually believe both those theories.
yeah as a child/youth the Cain/Big Foot story was great Mormon olklore
I've nothing against the story, but...

I suppose Mormonism has lost its magic world view as Quinn calls it, which is the problem. Little myatery left, but it doesn't fit well in the book.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 2:19 pm
by ransomme
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 2:14 pm
ransomme wrote: March 26th, 2022, 2:07 pm
iWriteStuff wrote: March 26th, 2022, 12:45 pm
ransomme wrote: March 26th, 2022, 10:50 am
which humor was more dry? more sarcastic?

I had a copy of MoF in my parent's home from as far back as I can remember. I always wanted to read it because of the title, but always felt repelled when it came down to cracking it open.
Haha well if that was humor it went right over my head. I have no doubt there are some people who actually believe both those theories.
yeah as a child/youth the Cain/Big Foot story was great Mormon olklore
I've nothing against the story, but...

I suppose Mormonism has lost its magic world view as Quinn calls it, which is the problem. Little myatery left, but it doesn't fit well in the book.
Yes the supernatural is steadily being removed from Mormonism.

edit:
I realized this strongly after reading these some 7 years back
0 Heiser supernatural.jpeg
0 Heiser supernatural.jpeg (244.22 KiB) Viewed 313 times

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 2:42 pm
by JuneBug12000
Niemand wrote: March 25th, 2022, 2:59 am
Robin Hood wrote: March 24th, 2022, 4:58 pm
Niemand wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:24 pm Miracle of Forgiveness doesn't merit its title. If you read it, it's a wonder if anyone gets forgiven at all.

Yes, as someone said, it contains such joys as masturbation being next to murder and turning you gay. Considering how many teenage boys do that, you'd think almost all men would grow up to become murderous queens. I think it constitutes a sin, but next to murder? No. Whole different ballgame.
It doesn't say masturbation is next to murder.
Have you read it?
I wish it didn't. A number of sins are equated with adultery and murder in the book. Like this list, where he basically did an "info dump" as they call it in creative writing circles. In fact, it lists some things that most Christians will do repeatedly in everyday life, all put next to the sin against the Holy Ghost which is the one sin which is unforgiveable and even worse than adultery, fornication and murder.
"Murder, adultery, theft, cursing, unholiness in masters, disobedience in servants, unfaithfulness, improvidence, hatred of God, disobedience to husbands, lack of natural affection, high-mindedness, flattery, lustfulness, infidelity, indiscretion, backbiting, whispering, lack of truth, striking, brawling, quarrelsomeness, unthankfulness, inhospitality, deceitfulness, irreverence, boasting, arrogance, pride,
double-tongued talk, profanity, slander, corruptness, thievery, embezzlement, despoiling, covenant-breaking, incontinence, filthiness, ignobleness, filthy communications, impurity, foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding, unmercifulness, idolatry, blasphemy, denial of the Holy Ghost, Sabbath breaking,
envy, jealousy, malice, maligning, vengefulness, implacability, bitterness, clamor, spite, defiling, reviling, evil speaking, provoking, greediness for filthy lucre, disobedience to parents, anger, hate, covetousness, bearing false witness, inventing evil things, fleshliness, heresy, presumptuousness, abomination, insatiable appetite, instability, ignorance, self-will, speaking evil of dignitaries, becoming a stumbling block; and in our modern language, masturbation, petting, fornication, adultery, homosexuality; and every sex perversion, every hidden and secret sin and all unholy and impure practices." (p. 25)
So in that quote, it lists masturbation next to murder and adultery. It also lists "backbiting", "flattery", "boasting, arrogance, pride, double-tongued talk, profanity" alongside murder. "Lustfulness" too which is a very broad brush.

I'm not saying these things are good necessarily, just that even putting some of these in the same category is ridiculous. If I stub my foot and swear, or gossip, that is being put in the same category as me having sex with someone's wife, or killing her husband. Ditto being angry or hateful (in a minor degree) or being impatient or argumentative ("quarrelsomeness"). If you're "ignorant" of something that is also a sin according to this list, although to be ignorant (in the original sense, i.e. not rudeness), that is lacking knowledge about something. See also "foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding". If you disobey your parents as a child, then you are on this list too. Even though every child does this at some stage (and usually regrets it later).

There are a few of these terms which could be read in more than one way, or might be unclear to readers. "Striking" (industrial action or hitting someone?), "cursing" (four letter words or putting a curse on someone?), "lack of natural affection", "disobedience in servants", "instability" (unreliability?!), "corruptness" (which can mean several things)...
"The "filthy dreamer" of the day or night, or an adulterer who still has desires toward the object of his sin, who still revels in the memories of his sin, has not forsaken it "with all his heart" as required by holy scripture." (p. 333)
This sounds to me that if you get what some people call a "wet dream", which I believe all boys do when they go through puberty (if they're healthy) then you are being equated with an adulterer. Given that every man also has, erm, a certain physioological condition in the early morning, whether they are lustful or not, then I can see this kind of talk being very confusing to teenage boys.

Or this gem. If you commit the same sin again then you have not repented.
"We can hardly be too forceful in reminding people that they cannot sin and be forgiven and then sin again and again and expect repeated forgiveness." (p 360)
I agree that if one does not truly repent, then one will repeat sin, and one shouldn't do it again and again, but there are those who do genuinely repent and manage to repeat the same sin more than once. This is true of addictions which are very hard habits to break. If someone is trying to give up smoking, and relapses two or three times, then we're told here they're not to expect forgiveness.

These repeated sins according to his own list above, would include anger, impatience, hatred, ignorance, foolishness etc. None of which are good, but things that most of us have on a regular basis.

It should be called It's a Miracle if you get any Forgiveness.
"One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation." (p 206-207)
That isn't Christianity.

Or this:
"That transgressor is not fully repentant who neglects his tithing, misses his meetings, breaks the Sabbath, fails in his family prayers, does not sustain the authorities of the Church, breaks the Word of Wisdom, does not love the Lord nor his fellowmen."
In other words, you're told to attend church and obey its hierarchy, but faith in Christ won't save you (previous quote).

Instead of asking why so many people don't like it, we should maybe ask why so many people do. Personally, I won't miss it if it goes, even if it is being removed for the wrong reasons.

LDS books go through fashions. "Miracle" is out, and Callister's Infinite Atonement is in.
I'm sorry some had a bad experience with the book, but as someone pointed out, that could happen reading the scriptures too.

I don't remember having a bad experience with it, like others, I felt like forgiveness was a real miracle and I was grateful. I was a young adult at the time.

As for the list and whether or not murder and adultery should be with other lesser sins, I would argue they should. My basis for that is the ten commandments.

Thou shalt not kill or dishonor your parents. Thou shalt not covet or commit adultery. The whole list is things I wish no one ever did, with things most people do sooner or later. But God made that list, so I think it is a good example.. . . All need repentance from both everyday and extreme sins.

(I'm not interested in getting into the debate about whether some sins worse than others. Yes, they are. No, that doesn't give anyone a pass on needing to repent of and avoid the "small" ones. )

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 3:01 pm
by LDS Watchman
Niemand wrote: March 25th, 2022, 2:59 am
Robin Hood wrote: March 24th, 2022, 4:58 pm
Niemand wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:24 pm Miracle of Forgiveness doesn't merit its title. If you read it, it's a wonder if anyone gets forgiven at all.

Yes, as someone said, it contains such joys as masturbation being next to murder and turning you gay. Considering how many teenage boys do that, you'd think almost all men would grow up to become murderous queens. I think it constitutes a sin, but next to murder? No. Whole different ballgame.
It doesn't say masturbation is next to murder.
Have you read it?
I wish it didn't. A number of sins are equated with adultery and murder in the book. Like this list, where he basically did an "info dump" as they call it in creative writing circles. In fact, it lists some things that most Christians will do repeatedly in everyday life, all put next to the sin against the Holy Ghost which is the one sin which is unforgiveable and even worse than adultery, fornication and murder.
"Murder, adultery, theft, cursing, unholiness in masters, disobedience in servants, unfaithfulness, improvidence, hatred of God, disobedience to husbands, lack of natural affection, high-mindedness, flattery, lustfulness, infidelity, indiscretion, backbiting, whispering, lack of truth, striking, brawling, quarrelsomeness, unthankfulness, inhospitality, deceitfulness, irreverence, boasting, arrogance, pride,
double-tongued talk, profanity, slander, corruptness, thievery, embezzlement, despoiling, covenant-breaking, incontinence, filthiness, ignobleness, filthy communications, impurity, foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding, unmercifulness, idolatry, blasphemy, denial of the Holy Ghost, Sabbath breaking,
envy, jealousy, malice, maligning, vengefulness, implacability, bitterness, clamor, spite, defiling, reviling, evil speaking, provoking, greediness for filthy lucre, disobedience to parents, anger, hate, covetousness, bearing false witness, inventing evil things, fleshliness, heresy, presumptuousness, abomination, insatiable appetite, instability, ignorance, self-will, speaking evil of dignitaries, becoming a stumbling block; and in our modern language, masturbation, petting, fornication, adultery, homosexuality; and every sex perversion, every hidden and secret sin and all unholy and impure practices." (p. 25)
So in that quote, it lists masturbation next to murder and adultery. It also lists "backbiting", "flattery", "boasting, arrogance, pride, double-tongued talk, profanity" alongside murder. "Lustfulness" too which is a very broad brush.

I'm not saying these things are good necessarily, just that even putting some of these in the same category is ridiculous. If I stub my foot and swear, or gossip, that is being put in the same category as me having sex with someone's wife, or killing her husband. Ditto being angry or hateful (in a minor degree) or being impatient or argumentative ("quarrelsomeness"). If you're "ignorant" of something that is also a sin according to this list, although to be ignorant (in the original sense, i.e. not rudeness), that is lacking knowledge about something. See also "foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding". If you disobey your parents as a child, then you are on this list too. Even though every child does this at some stage (and usually regrets it later).

There are a few of these terms which could be read in more than one way, or might be unclear to readers. "Striking" (industrial action or hitting someone?), "cursing" (four letter words or putting a curse on someone?), "lack of natural affection", "disobedience in servants", "instability" (unreliability?!), "corruptness" (which can mean several things)...
"The "filthy dreamer" of the day or night, or an adulterer who still has desires toward the object of his sin, who still revels in the memories of his sin, has not forsaken it "with all his heart" as required by holy scripture." (p. 333)
This sounds to me that if you get what some people call a "wet dream", which I believe all boys do when they go through puberty (if they're healthy) then you are being equated with an adulterer. Given that every man also has, erm, a certain physioological condition in the early morning, whether they are lustful or not, then I can see this kind of talk being very confusing to teenage boys.

Or this gem. If you commit the same sin again then you have not repented.
"We can hardly be too forceful in reminding people that they cannot sin and be forgiven and then sin again and again and expect repeated forgiveness." (p 360)
I agree that if one does not truly repent, then one will repeat sin, and one shouldn't do it again and again, but there are those who do genuinely repent and manage to repeat the same sin more than once. This is true of addictions which are very hard habits to break. If someone is trying to give up smoking, and relapses two or three times, then we're told here they're not to expect forgiveness.

These repeated sins according to his own list above, would include anger, impatience, hatred, ignorance, foolishness etc. None of which are good, but things that most of us have on a regular basis.

It should be called It's a Miracle if you get any Forgiveness.
"One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation." (p 206-207)
That isn't Christianity.

Or this:
"That transgressor is not fully repentant who neglects his tithing, misses his meetings, breaks the Sabbath, fails in his family prayers, does not sustain the authorities of the Church, breaks the Word of Wisdom, does not love the Lord nor his fellowmen."
In other words, you're told to attend church and obey its hierarchy, but faith in Christ won't save you (previous quote).

Instead of asking why so many people don't like it, we should maybe ask why so many people do. Personally, I won't miss it if it goes, even if it is being removed for the wrong reasons.

LDS books go through fashions. "Miracle" is out, and Callister's Infinite Atonement is in.
I read the Miracle of Forgiveness on my mission and felt inspired by it.

Kimball’s list of serious sins is really no different than the list of sins Paul provides in Romans 1:18-32. Paul them sums up his list by declaring that those who commit these various sins are worthy of death.

Sin is serious business and the only cure is sincere and complete repentance. Kimball’s book helps people recognize the severity of their sins so they can humble themselves to the point necessary to repent and obtain forgiveness.

People need to stop being snowflakes.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 3:38 pm
by Niemand
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:01 pm Sin is serious business and the only cure is sincere and complete repentance. Kimball’s book helps people recognize the severity of their sins so they can humble themselves to the point necessary to repent and obtain forgiveness.

People need to stop being snowflakes.
You do serious business every day then. So does everyone else. But there is a major difference between what you think, what you do and what you persuade others to do.

But you can't equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, wiith murdering someone. One of these is easily remedied, the other is final, and potentially deprives someone of salvation and children of a parent etc. Same with adultery - it is a sin involving at least three people, not just the one.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 3:48 pm
by LDS Watchman
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:38 pm
But you can't equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, wiith murdering someone.
Neither Kimball nor Paul did this, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 4:15 pm
by Niemand
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:48 pm
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:38 pm
But you can't equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, wiith murdering someone.
Neither Kimball nor Paul did this, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
Kimball does. You even quoted the relevant passage from me. He bundled them all together. A solo sin is different from a sin which involves or persuades other people. In the latter case, your repentance cannot cover for the other person.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 4:21 pm
by LDS Watchman
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 4:15 pm
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:48 pm
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:38 pm
But you can't equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, wiith murdering someone.
Neither Kimball nor Paul did this, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
Kimball does. You even quoted the relevant passage from me. He bundled them all together. A solo sin is different from a sin which involves or persuades other people. In the latter case, your repentance cannot cover for the other person.
No, Kimball did not in any way "equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, with murdering someone" any more than Paul did in Romans 1 or God did in Exodus 20.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 4:31 pm
by sandman45
Fred wrote: March 24th, 2022, 12:50 pm
NowWhat wrote: March 24th, 2022, 12:49 pm I knew that Deseret Books Online was working on a CRT video. Now I learn (Eric Moutsos) that they have removed Pres. Spencer Kimball's "The Miracle of Forgiveness" from the book store and the website. Thank you, Sheri Dew and friends.
I've never read the book, but I do know people that left the church over it.
I read it twice. Really good book


But I guess he was a toxic white supremacist racist male so can’t have his book around.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 4:59 pm
by Niemand
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 4:21 pm
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 4:15 pm
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:48 pm
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 3:38 pm
But you can't equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, wiith murdering someone.
Neither Kimball nor Paul did this, so I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
Kimball does. You even quoted the relevant passage from me. He bundled them all together. A solo sin is different from a sin which involves or persuades other people. In the latter case, your repentance cannot cover for the other person.
No, Kimball did not in any way "equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, with murdering someone" any more than Paul did in Romans 1 or God did in Exodus 20.
The relevant passage is above. He does. Your alter ego even quoted it.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 6:27 pm
by LDS Watchman
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 4:59 pm
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 4:21 pm
No, Kimball did not in any way "equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, with murdering someone" any more than Paul did in Romans 1 or God did in Exodus 20.
The relevant passage is above. He does.
No, he doesn't. Unless you want to also say that Paul and God did the same thing.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 6:59 pm
by Niemand
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 6:27 pm
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 4:59 pm
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 4:21 pm
No, Kimball did not in any way "equate a stray angry thought, which is not followed through, with murdering someone" any more than Paul did in Romans 1 or God did in Exodus 20.
The relevant passage is above. He does. Your alter ego even quoted it.
No, he doesn't. Unless you want to also say that Paul and God did the same thing.
Are you suggesting God wrote the book? Because it reads like the work of a man.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 7:51 pm
by LDS Watchman
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 6:59 pm
Are you suggesting God wrote the book? Because it reads like the work of a man.
You're attempting to move the goal posts.

We don't have a books written directly by God. What we have our books written by God's prophets, as directed by him.

You apparently believe the 10 commandments, which were written by the finger of God, equate being jealous about one of your neighbors possessions one time without acting out on it with murder and adultery.

Or was Moses unspired? How about Paul in his letter to the Romans?

Because there's no difference in either of these lists (or others in the scriptures) and the list in Kimball’s book.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 27th, 2022, 3:42 pm
by Niemand
Atticus wrote: March 26th, 2022, 7:51 pm
Niemand wrote: March 26th, 2022, 6:59 pm
Are you suggesting God wrote the book? Because it reads like the work of a man.
You're attempting to move the goal posts.

We don't have a books written directly by God. What we have our books written by God's prophets, as directed by him.

You apparently believe the 10 commandments, which were written by the finger of God, equate being jealous about one of your neighbors possessions one time without acting out on it with murder and adultery.

Or was Moses unspired? How about Paul in his letter to the Romans?

Because there's no difference in either of these lists (or others in the scriptures) and the list in Kimball’s book.
Well, I see Arphaxad liked Arminius' post, or was it the other way round? Hard to keep track of your accounts.

The Decalogue is divided up into several neat sections, and is concise. It isn't just an info dump.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 27th, 2022, 8:48 pm
by GeeR
Mamabear wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:36 pm https://deseretbook.com/products?query= ... orgiveness
Well, maybe deseret and co will come out and say kimball was a homophobe. And every other leader who spoke against it.
No, they'll be called cultural homophobes ;)

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 27th, 2022, 9:03 pm
by GeeR
LDS Physician wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:27 pm
Rubicon wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:23 pm
LDS Physician wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:18 pm
This right here, perfectly said. That book feels like a parent screaming at a 4 year-old child who falls off the bike while learning to ride it. It certainly doesn't reflect the love, mercy, long-suffering, tolerant Savior who looked at the adulteress and asked "Where are your accusers?"
It seems increasingly that the book is more of a mirror reflecting the reader/commenter than anything else. A Rorschach test . . .

A great many people didn't come away from it with anything like the feeling of "a parent screaming at a 4 year-old child who falls off the bike while learning to ride it."
Guess I'm an evil sinner whom God hates ... even my "minor" sins equate to adultery and murder. Fire, hell, brimstone, and gnashing of teeth await me.

What was it like to read it and not feel guilt, shame, or fear?
Like reading the 10 commandments for the first time!

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 27th, 2022, 9:05 pm
by LDS Watchman
Niemand wrote: March 27th, 2022, 3:42 pm
Well, I see Arphaxad liked Arminius' post, or was it the other way round? Hard to keep track of your accounts.

The Decalogue is divided up into several neat sections, and is concise. It isn't just an info dump.
Neither of these are my accounts.

This appears to be a symptom of paranoia. Life is better when you don't think there's a conspiracy lurking under every rock.

The 10 commandments are all listed together. So I guess God said that being jealous of your neighbors possessions one time, but not acting out on it, is the equal to murder and adultery. And Paul said the same thing.

Or, here's a crazy thought, maybe it's possible to list sins together without declaring them all equal in severity.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 27th, 2022, 9:12 pm
by Great8
DB is a joke. They no longer sell meaningful writings. Instead, they sell high margin art work which in my opinion makes the MSM feel comfy in their home with their idolatry. I was able to buy byu chocolate milk which was nice. Other than that, a huge disappointment!!!

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 27th, 2022, 11:39 pm
by LDS Watchman
Great8 wrote: March 27th, 2022, 9:12 pm DB is a joke. They no longer sell meaningful writings. Instead, they sell high margin art work which in my opinion makes the MSM feel comfy in their home with their idolatry. I was able to buy byu chocolate milk which was nice. Other than that, a huge disappointment!!!
A lot of what is sold there is just fluffy, feel good, stuff, with no substance. But there are are still some real gems to be found there, such as the scriptures and Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. I believe they still sell the Journal of Discourses, too. You just have to know what you're looking for.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 28th, 2022, 5:17 am
by Niemand
Atticus wrote: March 27th, 2022, 9:05 pm This appears to be a symptom of paranoia. Life is better when you don't think there's a conspiracy lurking under every rock.
Ah, gaslighting, nice. I suppose it's just a coincidence that two posters named after figures from classical civilisation seem to align with each other so neatly, and are often active around the same time.

Yes, just a coincidence. Move on.

Tell Arphaxad that I say, "Hi".

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 28th, 2022, 5:19 am
by ransomme
GeeR wrote: March 27th, 2022, 8:48 pm
Mamabear wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:36 pm https://deseretbook.com/products?query= ... orgiveness
Well, maybe deseret and co will come out and say kimball was a homophobe. And every other leader who spoke against it.
No, they'll be called cultural homophobes ;)
I thought all heterosexuals are by default homophobes just like all whites are inherently racist