Page 2 of 5

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 24th, 2022, 7:50 pm
by spiritMan
Dave62 wrote: March 24th, 2022, 6:14 pm I read it as a young missionary. Yes, the first half of the book is full of condemnation, the angry God of the Old Testament, the God of War, hellfire and brimstone. The God of Justice roars at you from its pages that you are worthless to enter His presence. Then the God of the New Testament is revealed in the latter part of the book. It teaches how to be reconciled to God through the Grace of Jesus. I think it does the job adequately.
People who say this haven't read Paul or the new testament. The NT is VERY harsh, people just don't read that part and skip it.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 24th, 2022, 8:03 pm
by iWriteStuff
spiritMan wrote: March 24th, 2022, 7:44 pm
iWriteStuff wrote: March 24th, 2022, 2:24 pm
Rubicon wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:55 pm
Niemand wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:24 pm Miracle of Forgiveness doesn't merit its title. If you read it, it's a wonder if anyone gets forgiven at all.
People say that, and it's like they haven't read the book. Yes, the first part makes clear the need for repentance --- that we all are sinners. But especially the last chapters (God will forgive, the Church will forgive, forgive yourself) emphasize hope and grace.

The problem is that many people in today's church only want to be told "you are enough." Anything emphasizing godly sorrow and a broken heart and contrite spirit are denounced as causing anxiety, depression, inadequacy, etc. Which is why things like, say, conference talks haven't focused on repentance for some time now.
Eh I don't know about that.... Anecdotal, but here goes:

When I first gained a testimony of my relationship to God, it was like fire all over. I knew I needed to change, to repent, to come unto Christ, and to do everything I could to show my gratitude for His love. I was so grateful to feel His presence in my life that I would have done anything to maintain that special glow that I felt in my heart and soul. It was truly transformational, and why I went from being a directionless wanderer to wanting to serve a mission and bring that same experience to other people. I read the BofM cover to cover for the first time in a while, then followed up with the rest of the scriptures. Then I went about the house finding anything else I could read which might help me align my will closer to God's.

Then I read Miracle of Forgiveness. I went from feeling like God loved me to believing God would only love me IF I obeyed every commandment, lived a perfect life, and never sinned even in the slightest ever ever again. In short, I went from feeling forgiven to feeling condemned. That developed into a guilt/shame complex that lasted years. Gone was the joy of knowing God loved me, and here to stay was this knowledge that the church and its leaders can judge me and cast me out any time they like and there's little a loving God could do about it. Better still, I internalized that guilt/shame until I judged myself more harshly than anyone else could, God included. In short, I trusted the message (how could I not? A Prophet said it) and not the personal experience I had had with my Heavenly Father.

Now, I realize that was not Spencer Kimball's intent. At least I don't think it was. But that was the effect all the same. It took me a long time to realize that people tend to see God not as He is, but as THEY are. It's not that I don't expect God to judge sins and reproach the sinner; it's that I started to think that God's love was conditioned on us being perfect. I'd forgotten that God loved me BEFORE I repented.

But, as they say, your mileage may vary.
Clearly you don't read the scriptures then, bc the scriptures are way harsher than Kimbell.


Convenient excuse to blame someone else for your problems.
Ha, thanks bro. Peace be unto you, too.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 2:59 am
by Niemand
Robin Hood wrote: March 24th, 2022, 4:58 pm
Niemand wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:24 pm Miracle of Forgiveness doesn't merit its title. If you read it, it's a wonder if anyone gets forgiven at all.

Yes, as someone said, it contains such joys as masturbation being next to murder and turning you gay. Considering how many teenage boys do that, you'd think almost all men would grow up to become murderous queens. I think it constitutes a sin, but next to murder? No. Whole different ballgame.
It doesn't say masturbation is next to murder.
Have you read it?
I wish it didn't. A number of sins are equated with adultery and murder in the book. Like this list, where he basically did an "info dump" as they call it in creative writing circles. In fact, it lists some things that most Christians will do repeatedly in everyday life, all put next to the sin against the Holy Ghost which is the one sin which is unforgiveable and even worse than adultery, fornication and murder.
"Murder, adultery, theft, cursing, unholiness in masters, disobedience in servants, unfaithfulness, improvidence, hatred of God, disobedience to husbands, lack of natural affection, high-mindedness, flattery, lustfulness, infidelity, indiscretion, backbiting, whispering, lack of truth, striking, brawling, quarrelsomeness, unthankfulness, inhospitality, deceitfulness, irreverence, boasting, arrogance, pride,
double-tongued talk, profanity, slander, corruptness, thievery, embezzlement, despoiling, covenant-breaking, incontinence, filthiness, ignobleness, filthy communications, impurity, foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding, unmercifulness, idolatry, blasphemy, denial of the Holy Ghost, Sabbath breaking,
envy, jealousy, malice, maligning, vengefulness, implacability, bitterness, clamor, spite, defiling, reviling, evil speaking, provoking, greediness for filthy lucre, disobedience to parents, anger, hate, covetousness, bearing false witness, inventing evil things, fleshliness, heresy, presumptuousness, abomination, insatiable appetite, instability, ignorance, self-will, speaking evil of dignitaries, becoming a stumbling block; and in our modern language, masturbation, petting, fornication, adultery, homosexuality; and every sex perversion, every hidden and secret sin and all unholy and impure practices." (p. 25)
So in that quote, it lists masturbation next to murder and adultery. It also lists "backbiting", "flattery", "boasting, arrogance, pride, double-tongued talk, profanity" alongside murder. "Lustfulness" too which is a very broad brush.

I'm not saying these things are good necessarily, just that even putting some of these in the same category is ridiculous. If I stub my foot and swear, or gossip, that is being put in the same category as me having sex with someone's wife, or killing her husband. Ditto being angry or hateful (in a minor degree) or being impatient or argumentative ("quarrelsomeness"). If you're "ignorant" of something that is also a sin according to this list, although to be ignorant (in the original sense, i.e. not rudeness), that is lacking knowledge about something. See also "foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding". If you disobey your parents as a child, then you are on this list too. Even though every child does this at some stage (and usually regrets it later).

There are a few of these terms which could be read in more than one way, or might be unclear to readers. "Striking" (industrial action or hitting someone?), "cursing" (four letter words or putting a curse on someone?), "lack of natural affection", "disobedience in servants", "instability" (unreliability?!), "corruptness" (which can mean several things)...
"The "filthy dreamer" of the day or night, or an adulterer who still has desires toward the object of his sin, who still revels in the memories of his sin, has not forsaken it "with all his heart" as required by holy scripture." (p. 333)
This sounds to me that if you get what some people call a "wet dream", which I believe all boys do when they go through puberty (if they're healthy) then you are being equated with an adulterer. Given that every man also has, erm, a certain physioological condition in the early morning, whether they are lustful or not, then I can see this kind of talk being very confusing to teenage boys.

Or this gem. If you commit the same sin again then you have not repented.
"We can hardly be too forceful in reminding people that they cannot sin and be forgiven and then sin again and again and expect repeated forgiveness." (p 360)
I agree that if one does not truly repent, then one will repeat sin, and one shouldn't do it again and again, but there are those who do genuinely repent and manage to repeat the same sin more than once. This is true of addictions which are very hard habits to break. If someone is trying to give up smoking, and relapses two or three times, then we're told here they're not to expect forgiveness.

These repeated sins according to his own list above, would include anger, impatience, hatred, ignorance, foolishness etc. None of which are good, but things that most of us have on a regular basis.

It should be called It's a Miracle if you get any Forgiveness.
"One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation." (p 206-207)
That isn't Christianity.

Or this:
"That transgressor is not fully repentant who neglects his tithing, misses his meetings, breaks the Sabbath, fails in his family prayers, does not sustain the authorities of the Church, breaks the Word of Wisdom, does not love the Lord nor his fellowmen."
In other words, you're told to attend church and obey its hierarchy, but faith in Christ won't save you (previous quote).

Instead of asking why so many people don't like it, we should maybe ask why so many people do. Personally, I won't miss it if it goes, even if it is being removed for the wrong reasons.

LDS books go through fashions. "Miracle" is out, and Callister's Infinite Atonement is in.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 4:45 am
by Robin Hood
Niemand wrote: March 25th, 2022, 2:59 am
Robin Hood wrote: March 24th, 2022, 4:58 pm
Niemand wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:24 pm Miracle of Forgiveness doesn't merit its title. If you read it, it's a wonder if anyone gets forgiven at all.

Yes, as someone said, it contains such joys as masturbation being next to murder and turning you gay. Considering how many teenage boys do that, you'd think almost all men would grow up to become murderous queens. I think it constitutes a sin, but next to murder? No. Whole different ballgame.
It doesn't say masturbation is next to murder.
Have you read it?
I wish it didn't. A number of sins are equated with adultery and murder in the book. Like this list, where he basically did an "info dump" as they call it in creative writing circles. In fact, it lists some things that most Christians will do repeatedly in everyday life, all put next to the sin against the Holy Ghost which is the one sin which is unforgiveable and even worse than adultery, fornication and murder.
"Murder, adultery, theft, cursing, unholiness in masters, disobedience in servants, unfaithfulness, improvidence, hatred of God, disobedience to husbands, lack of natural affection, high-mindedness, flattery, lustfulness, infidelity, indiscretion, backbiting, whispering, lack of truth, striking, brawling, quarrelsomeness, unthankfulness, inhospitality, deceitfulness, irreverence, boasting, arrogance, pride,
double-tongued talk, profanity, slander, corruptness, thievery, embezzlement, despoiling, covenant-breaking, incontinence, filthiness, ignobleness, filthy communications, impurity, foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding, unmercifulness, idolatry, blasphemy, denial of the Holy Ghost, Sabbath breaking,
envy, jealousy, malice, maligning, vengefulness, implacability, bitterness, clamor, spite, defiling, reviling, evil speaking, provoking, greediness for filthy lucre, disobedience to parents, anger, hate, covetousness, bearing false witness, inventing evil things, fleshliness, heresy, presumptuousness, abomination, insatiable appetite, instability, ignorance, self-will, speaking evil of dignitaries, becoming a stumbling block; and in our modern language, masturbation, petting, fornication, adultery, homosexuality; and every sex perversion, every hidden and secret sin and all unholy and impure practices." (p. 25)
So in that quote, it lists masturbation next to murder and adultery. It also lists "backbiting", "flattery", "boasting, arrogance, pride, double-tongued talk, profanity" alongside murder. "Lustfulness" too which is a very broad brush.

I'm not saying these things are good necessarily, just that even putting some of these in the same category is ridiculous. If I stub my foot and swear, or gossip, that is being put in the same category as me having sex with someone's wife, or killing her husband. Ditto being angry or hateful (in a minor degree) or being impatient or argumentative ("quarrelsomeness"). If you're "ignorant" of something that is also a sin according to this list, although to be ignorant (in the original sense, i.e. not rudeness), that is lacking knowledge about something. See also "foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding". If you disobey your parents as a child, then you are on this list too. Even though every child does this at some stage (and usually regrets it later).

There are a few of these terms which could be read in more than one way, or might be unclear to readers. "Striking" (industrial action or hitting someone?), "cursing" (four letter words or putting a curse on someone?), "lack of natural affection", "disobedience in servants", "instability" (unreliability?!), "corruptness" (which can mean several things)...
"The "filthy dreamer" of the day or night, or an adulterer who still has desires toward the object of his sin, who still revels in the memories of his sin, has not forsaken it "with all his heart" as required by holy scripture." (p. 333)
This sounds to me that if you get what some people call a "wet dream", which I believe all boys do when they go through puberty (if they're healthy) then you are being equated with an adulterer. Given that every man also has, erm, a certain physioological condition in the early morning, whether they are lustful or not, then I can see this kind of talk being very confusing to teenage boys.

Or this gem. If you commit the same sin again then you have not repented.
"We can hardly be too forceful in reminding people that they cannot sin and be forgiven and then sin again and again and expect repeated forgiveness." (p 360)
I agree that if one does not truly repent, then one will repeat sin, and one shouldn't do it again and again, but there are those who do genuinely repent and manage to repeat the same sin more than once. This is true of addictions which are very hard habits to break. If someone is trying to give up smoking, and relapses two or three times, then we're told here they're not to expect forgiveness.

These repeated sins according to his own list above, would include anger, impatience, hatred, ignorance, foolishness etc. None of which are good, but things that most of us have on a regular basis.

It should be called It's a Miracle if you get any Forgiveness.
"One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation." (p 206-207)
That isn't Christianity.

Or this:
"That transgressor is not fully repentant who neglects his tithing, misses his meetings, breaks the Sabbath, fails in his family prayers, does not sustain the authorities of the Church, breaks the Word of Wisdom, does not love the Lord nor his fellowmen."
In other words, you're told to attend church and obey its hierarchy, but faith in Christ won't save you (previous quote).

Instead of asking why so many people don't like it, we should maybe ask why so many people do. Personally, I won't miss it if it goes, even if it is being removed for the wrong reasons.

LDS books go through fashions. "Miracle" is out, and Callister's Infinite Atonement is in.
I think you are clearly misreading it. He is not saying that masturbation or back-biting are as serious as murder in and of themselves. Context is everything.
Any of those sins (which is clearly an attempt to list every sin there is) will keep us seperated from God if unrepented of.
Like I said, have you read the book? The reason I ask is that I read it many years ago and found it to be ok. Bro. Kimball pulls no punches, that is true, but on the whole I found it to be alright. I didn't agree with everything of course, but I couldn't understand what everyone was getting so upset about and still can't.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 5:24 am
by Niemand
Robin Hood wrote: March 25th, 2022, 4:45 am
Niemand wrote: March 25th, 2022, 2:59 am
Robin Hood wrote: March 24th, 2022, 4:58 pm
Niemand wrote: March 24th, 2022, 1:24 pm Miracle of Forgiveness doesn't merit its title. If you read it, it's a wonder if anyone gets forgiven at all.

Yes, as someone said, it contains such joys as masturbation being next to murder and turning you gay. Considering how many teenage boys do that, you'd think almost all men would grow up to become murderous queens. I think it constitutes a sin, but next to murder? No. Whole different ballgame.
It doesn't say masturbation is next to murder.
Have you read it?
I wish it didn't. A number of sins are equated with adultery and murder in the book. Like this list, where he basically did an "info dump" as they call it in creative writing circles. In fact, it lists some things that most Christians will do repeatedly in everyday life, all put next to the sin against the Holy Ghost which is the one sin which is unforgiveable and even worse than adultery, fornication and murder.
"Murder, adultery, theft, cursing, unholiness in masters, disobedience in servants, unfaithfulness, improvidence, hatred of God, disobedience to husbands, lack of natural affection, high-mindedness, flattery, lustfulness, infidelity, indiscretion, backbiting, whispering, lack of truth, striking, brawling, quarrelsomeness, unthankfulness, inhospitality, deceitfulness, irreverence, boasting, arrogance, pride,
double-tongued talk, profanity, slander, corruptness, thievery, embezzlement, despoiling, covenant-breaking, incontinence, filthiness, ignobleness, filthy communications, impurity, foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding, unmercifulness, idolatry, blasphemy, denial of the Holy Ghost, Sabbath breaking,
envy, jealousy, malice, maligning, vengefulness, implacability, bitterness, clamor, spite, defiling, reviling, evil speaking, provoking, greediness for filthy lucre, disobedience to parents, anger, hate, covetousness, bearing false witness, inventing evil things, fleshliness, heresy, presumptuousness, abomination, insatiable appetite, instability, ignorance, self-will, speaking evil of dignitaries, becoming a stumbling block; and in our modern language, masturbation, petting, fornication, adultery, homosexuality; and every sex perversion, every hidden and secret sin and all unholy and impure practices." (p. 25)
So in that quote, it lists masturbation next to murder and adultery. It also lists "backbiting", "flattery", "boasting, arrogance, pride, double-tongued talk, profanity" alongside murder. "Lustfulness" too which is a very broad brush.

I'm not saying these things are good necessarily, just that even putting some of these in the same category is ridiculous. If I stub my foot and swear, or gossip, that is being put in the same category as me having sex with someone's wife, or killing her husband. Ditto being angry or hateful (in a minor degree) or being impatient or argumentative ("quarrelsomeness"). If you're "ignorant" of something that is also a sin according to this list, although to be ignorant (in the original sense, i.e. not rudeness), that is lacking knowledge about something. See also "foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding". If you disobey your parents as a child, then you are on this list too. Even though every child does this at some stage (and usually regrets it later).

There are a few of these terms which could be read in more than one way, or might be unclear to readers. "Striking" (industrial action or hitting someone?), "cursing" (four letter words or putting a curse on someone?), "lack of natural affection", "disobedience in servants", "instability" (unreliability?!), "corruptness" (which can mean several things)...
"The "filthy dreamer" of the day or night, or an adulterer who still has desires toward the object of his sin, who still revels in the memories of his sin, has not forsaken it "with all his heart" as required by holy scripture." (p. 333)
This sounds to me that if you get what some people call a "wet dream", which I believe all boys do when they go through puberty (if they're healthy) then you are being equated with an adulterer. Given that every man also has, erm, a certain physioological condition in the early morning, whether they are lustful or not, then I can see this kind of talk being very confusing to teenage boys.

Or this gem. If you commit the same sin again then you have not repented.
"We can hardly be too forceful in reminding people that they cannot sin and be forgiven and then sin again and again and expect repeated forgiveness." (p 360)
I agree that if one does not truly repent, then one will repeat sin, and one shouldn't do it again and again, but there are those who do genuinely repent and manage to repeat the same sin more than once. This is true of addictions which are very hard habits to break. If someone is trying to give up smoking, and relapses two or three times, then we're told here they're not to expect forgiveness.

These repeated sins according to his own list above, would include anger, impatience, hatred, ignorance, foolishness etc. None of which are good, but things that most of us have on a regular basis.

It should be called It's a Miracle if you get any Forgiveness.
"One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation." (p 206-207)
That isn't Christianity.

Or this:
"That transgressor is not fully repentant who neglects his tithing, misses his meetings, breaks the Sabbath, fails in his family prayers, does not sustain the authorities of the Church, breaks the Word of Wisdom, does not love the Lord nor his fellowmen."
In other words, you're told to attend church and obey its hierarchy, but faith in Christ won't save you (previous quote).

Instead of asking why so many people don't like it, we should maybe ask why so many people do. Personally, I won't miss it if it goes, even if it is being removed for the wrong reasons.

LDS books go through fashions. "Miracle" is out, and Callister's Infinite Atonement is in.
I think you are clearly misreading it. He is not saying that masturbation or back-biting are as serious as murder in and of themselves. Context is everything.
Any of those sins (which is clearly an attempt to list every sin there is) will keep us seperated from God if unrepented of.
Like I said, have you read the book?
Yes, more than once. Why do you keep asking? I wish I had forgotten it, because it was no help to me on my spiritual journey. Its good parts can all be found elsewhere (contained in the gospel), and the bad parts serve to confuse, distress and cause anxiety.

I am glad that I did not come across this book early on, as it would have given me the wrong ideas.
clearly an attempt to list every sin there is
We could probably think of a few more besides, if we put our minds to it, and some of those are near-duplicates. The Roman Catholics talk of the sin of despair, and this is what I gained off this book.

Others, as I have said, are unclear. Others are questionable - "ignorance" or "ignorant" is now commonly used (wrongly) to refer to rudeness or someone who is rude, but it also means a lack of knowledge. Wallowing in ignorance is one thing, but not knowing something is not a condemnation in itself, since most children are ignorant in the proper sense.

Why would he even list things like impatience and envy next to the unforgivable sin? These things are wrong, and we know that.

Then he goes and says elsewhere if you repeat a sin you're unforgivable. Yet we work our entire lives around certain (minor) issues we are all guilty of... and that we may commit many, many times.

When I was growing up, I used to hear a rhyme that went:
Sin is evil,
And evil is sin...
Sin is forgiven,
So get stuck in!
That's the opposite extreme, of course, and completely wrong, because it does not display contrition.

But this book's sentiment seems to be:
Sin is evil,
And evil is sin...
Nothing is well,
You're going to Hell!
This book is as more about attrition than contrition as far as I can see. Yet the scriptures tell us all our righteousness is like filthy rags.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 8:51 am
by Rubicon
LDS Physician wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:27 pm
What was it like to read it and not feel guilt, shame, or fear?
What was it like? I repented of things I needed to repent of, and felt my sin burden physically lifted off of my shoulders. His thesis in action --- forgiveness through the atonement is a miracle, and it's real.

But, I didn't spend the rest of my life grousing about how his book made me feel like I'll never be free of sin. That's not the message or takeaway I got from it at all. It's dismaying that that is all some people got from it, and again, I think it's more of a mirror into personality types and hangups than it is an indictment of the book.

Like someone said upthread, it's no wonder that so many in the Church are afraid to speak out against sins like homosexuality. People fly apart like glass and act like we are literally killing people who are suicidal because it's named as a sin. That's the same phenomenon that's going on with MoF hate.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 9:15 am
by Robin Hood
Niemand wrote: March 25th, 2022, 5:24 am
Robin Hood wrote: March 25th, 2022, 4:45 am
Niemand wrote: March 25th, 2022, 2:59 am
Robin Hood wrote: March 24th, 2022, 4:58 pm

It doesn't say masturbation is next to murder.
Have you read it?
I wish it didn't. A number of sins are equated with adultery and murder in the book. Like this list, where he basically did an "info dump" as they call it in creative writing circles. In fact, it lists some things that most Christians will do repeatedly in everyday life, all put next to the sin against the Holy Ghost which is the one sin which is unforgiveable and even worse than adultery, fornication and murder.
"Murder, adultery, theft, cursing, unholiness in masters, disobedience in servants, unfaithfulness, improvidence, hatred of God, disobedience to husbands, lack of natural affection, high-mindedness, flattery, lustfulness, infidelity, indiscretion, backbiting, whispering, lack of truth, striking, brawling, quarrelsomeness, unthankfulness, inhospitality, deceitfulness, irreverence, boasting, arrogance, pride,
double-tongued talk, profanity, slander, corruptness, thievery, embezzlement, despoiling, covenant-breaking, incontinence, filthiness, ignobleness, filthy communications, impurity, foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding, unmercifulness, idolatry, blasphemy, denial of the Holy Ghost, Sabbath breaking,
envy, jealousy, malice, maligning, vengefulness, implacability, bitterness, clamor, spite, defiling, reviling, evil speaking, provoking, greediness for filthy lucre, disobedience to parents, anger, hate, covetousness, bearing false witness, inventing evil things, fleshliness, heresy, presumptuousness, abomination, insatiable appetite, instability, ignorance, self-will, speaking evil of dignitaries, becoming a stumbling block; and in our modern language, masturbation, petting, fornication, adultery, homosexuality; and every sex perversion, every hidden and secret sin and all unholy and impure practices." (p. 25)
So in that quote, it lists masturbation next to murder and adultery. It also lists "backbiting", "flattery", "boasting, arrogance, pride, double-tongued talk, profanity" alongside murder. "Lustfulness" too which is a very broad brush.

I'm not saying these things are good necessarily, just that even putting some of these in the same category is ridiculous. If I stub my foot and swear, or gossip, that is being put in the same category as me having sex with someone's wife, or killing her husband. Ditto being angry or hateful (in a minor degree) or being impatient or argumentative ("quarrelsomeness"). If you're "ignorant" of something that is also a sin according to this list, although to be ignorant (in the original sense, i.e. not rudeness), that is lacking knowledge about something. See also "foolishness, slothfulness, impatience, lack of understanding". If you disobey your parents as a child, then you are on this list too. Even though every child does this at some stage (and usually regrets it later).

There are a few of these terms which could be read in more than one way, or might be unclear to readers. "Striking" (industrial action or hitting someone?), "cursing" (four letter words or putting a curse on someone?), "lack of natural affection", "disobedience in servants", "instability" (unreliability?!), "corruptness" (which can mean several things)...
"The "filthy dreamer" of the day or night, or an adulterer who still has desires toward the object of his sin, who still revels in the memories of his sin, has not forsaken it "with all his heart" as required by holy scripture." (p. 333)
This sounds to me that if you get what some people call a "wet dream", which I believe all boys do when they go through puberty (if they're healthy) then you are being equated with an adulterer. Given that every man also has, erm, a certain physioological condition in the early morning, whether they are lustful or not, then I can see this kind of talk being very confusing to teenage boys.

Or this gem. If you commit the same sin again then you have not repented.
"We can hardly be too forceful in reminding people that they cannot sin and be forgiven and then sin again and again and expect repeated forgiveness." (p 360)
I agree that if one does not truly repent, then one will repeat sin, and one shouldn't do it again and again, but there are those who do genuinely repent and manage to repeat the same sin more than once. This is true of addictions which are very hard habits to break. If someone is trying to give up smoking, and relapses two or three times, then we're told here they're not to expect forgiveness.

These repeated sins according to his own list above, would include anger, impatience, hatred, ignorance, foolishness etc. None of which are good, but things that most of us have on a regular basis.

It should be called It's a Miracle if you get any Forgiveness.
"One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God; that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation." (p 206-207)
That isn't Christianity.

Or this:
"That transgressor is not fully repentant who neglects his tithing, misses his meetings, breaks the Sabbath, fails in his family prayers, does not sustain the authorities of the Church, breaks the Word of Wisdom, does not love the Lord nor his fellowmen."
In other words, you're told to attend church and obey its hierarchy, but faith in Christ won't save you (previous quote).

Instead of asking why so many people don't like it, we should maybe ask why so many people do. Personally, I won't miss it if it goes, even if it is being removed for the wrong reasons.

LDS books go through fashions. "Miracle" is out, and Callister's Infinite Atonement is in.
I think you are clearly misreading it. He is not saying that masturbation or back-biting are as serious as murder in and of themselves. Context is everything.
Any of those sins (which is clearly an attempt to list every sin there is) will keep us seperated from God if unrepented of.
Like I said, have you read the book?
Yes, more than once. Why do you keep asking? I wish I had forgotten it, because it was no help to me on my spiritual journey. Its good parts can all be found elsewhere (contained in the gospel), and the bad parts serve to confuse, distress and cause anxiety.

I am glad that I did not come across this book early on, as it would have given me the wrong ideas.
clearly an attempt to list every sin there is
We could probably think of a few more besides, if we put our minds to it, and some of those are near-duplicates. The Roman Catholics talk of the sin of despair, and this is what I gained off this book.

Others, as I have said, are unclear. Others are questionable - "ignorance" or "ignorant" is now commonly used (wrongly) to refer to rudeness or someone who is rude, but it also means a lack of knowledge. Wallowing in ignorance is one thing, but not knowing something is not a condemnation in itself, since most children are ignorant in the proper sense.

Why would he even list things like impatience and envy next to the unforgivable sin? These things are wrong, and we know that.

Then he goes and says elsewhere if you repeat a sin you're unforgivable. Yet we work our entire lives around certain (minor) issues we are all guilty of... and that we may commit many, many times.

When I was growing up, I used to hear a rhyme that went:
Sin is evil,
And evil is sin...
Sin is forgiven,
So get stuck in!
That's the opposite extreme, of course, and completely wrong, because it does not display contrition.

But this book's sentiment seems to be:
Sin is evil,
And evil is sin...
Nothing is well,
You're going to Hell!
This book is as more about attrition than contrition as far as I can see. Yet the scriptures tell us all our righteousness is like filthy rags.
I think it was a product of it's time, and of Bro. Kimball's anxiety about the state of the church, meaning the condition of the Saints.
Rightly or wrongly, apostles only tend to deal with ordinary members when there is a problem. And if it gets up as far as the apostles it's a big problem... a very big one.
So Bro. Kimball will be dealing with murder cases, incest, paedophilia and other sexual perversions, industrial scale corruption, drug addiction, prostitution and so on. For a farm boy from Arizona it must have been a real eye opener to realise what a wicked world it is out there, and the toll it is taking on God's people. He is dealing with very serious issues and he feels the need to write the equivalent of a fire and brimstone sermon in order to shake the Saints and wake them up to the seriousness of sin and the depths to which sin can plunge us.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 9:44 am
by The Red Pill
If God cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance...and no unclean thing can enter the kingdom of God...

Was Kimball really being to harsh? Or was he preparing us for the harsh reality of the litmus test required to enter the Celestial kingdom.

Societies tend to trend downward toward sin and disobedience over time. Just compare the television shows of the 50s, 60s and 70s to today's if you doubt what I am saying.

Maybe we should be less upset at Kimball and adjust our thinking to how God looks at it. There are lessor kingdom's for a reason...but entrance to the Celestial kingdom has eternal unchanging entrance requirements...

...irregardless of what his disobedient children are engaged in at the moment.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 10:21 am
by AstonishingGrunt
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 9:44 am If God cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance...and no unclean thing can enter the kingdom of God...

Was Kimball really being to harsh? Or was he preparing us for the harsh reality of the litmus test required to enter the Celestial kingdom.

Societies tend to trend downward toward sin and disobedience over time. Just compare the television shows of the 50s, 60s and 70s to today's if you doubt what I am saying.

Maybe we should be less upset at Kimball and adjust our thinking to how God looks at it. There are lessor kingdom's for a reason...but entrance to the Celestial kingdom has eternal unchanging entrance requirements...

...irregardless of what his disobedient children are engaged in at the moment.
Not a word.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 10:23 am
by bjornagain
iWriteStuff wrote: March 24th, 2022, 12:59 pm But what about Cain/Sasquatch and masturbation leading to homosexuality? Those were great doctrines!
I absolutely believe both of these doctrines.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 10:26 am
by iWriteStuff
bjornagain wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:23 am
iWriteStuff wrote: March 24th, 2022, 12:59 pm But what about Cain/Sasquatch and masturbation leading to homosexuality? Those were great doctrines!
I absolutely believe both of these doctrines.
You're free to believe whatever you want. I remain a bit skeptical, but there's no harm in believing something if it keeps you from sin.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 10:32 am
by The Red Pill
AstonishingGrunt wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:21 am
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 9:44 am If God cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance...and no unclean thing can enter the kingdom of God...

Was Kimball really being to harsh? Or was he preparing us for the harsh reality of the litmus test required to enter the Celestial kingdom.

Societies tend to trend downward toward sin and disobedience over time. Just compare the television shows of the 50s, 60s and 70s to today's if you doubt what I am saying.

Maybe we should be less upset at Kimball and adjust our thinking to how God looks at it. There are lessor kingdom's for a reason...but entrance to the Celestial kingdom has eternal unchanging entrance requirements...

...irregardless of what his disobedient children are engaged in at the moment.
Not a word.
You are incorrect:

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/07/88764901 ... -is-a-word

On forums, I don't nitpick at grammar or spelling...I look at the content...but...irregardless...you are incorrect on it not being a word.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 10:49 am
by AstonishingGrunt
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:32 am
AstonishingGrunt wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:21 am
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 9:44 am If God cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance...and no unclean thing can enter the kingdom of God...

Was Kimball really being to harsh? Or was he preparing us for the harsh reality of the litmus test required to enter the Celestial kingdom.

Societies tend to trend downward toward sin and disobedience over time. Just compare the television shows of the 50s, 60s and 70s to today's if you doubt what I am saying.

Maybe we should be less upset at Kimball and adjust our thinking to how God looks at it. There are lessor kingdom's for a reason...but entrance to the Celestial kingdom has eternal unchanging entrance requirements...

...irregardless of what his disobedient children are engaged in at the moment.
Not a word.
You are incorrect:

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/07/88764901 ... -is-a-word

On forums, I don't nitpick at grammar or spelling...I look at the content...but...irregardless...you are incorrect on it not being a word.
Meh.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 10:56 am
by The Red Pill
AstonishingGrunt wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:49 am
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:32 am
AstonishingGrunt wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:21 am
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 9:44 am If God cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance...and no unclean thing can enter the kingdom of God...

Was Kimball really being to harsh? Or was he preparing us for the harsh reality of the litmus test required to enter the Celestial kingdom.

Societies tend to trend downward toward sin and disobedience over time. Just compare the television shows of the 50s, 60s and 70s to today's if you doubt what I am saying.

Maybe we should be less upset at Kimball and adjust our thinking to how God looks at it. There are lessor kingdom's for a reason...but entrance to the Celestial kingdom has eternal unchanging entrance requirements...

...irregardless of what his disobedient children are engaged in at the moment.
Not a word.
You are incorrect:

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/07/88764901 ... -is-a-word

On forums, I don't nitpick at grammar or spelling...I look at the content...but...irregardless...you are incorrect on it not being a word.
Meh.
You're the one who brought up the issue skippy...so you can show all the indifference you want...but you were wrong...DEAL with it.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 11:14 am
by AstonishingGrunt
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:56 am
AstonishingGrunt wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:49 am
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:32 am
AstonishingGrunt wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:21 am

Not a word.
You are incorrect:

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/07/88764901 ... -is-a-word

On forums, I don't nitpick at grammar or spelling...I look at the content...but...irregardless...you are incorrect on it not being a word.
Meh.
You're the one who brought up the issue skippy...so you can show all the indifference you want...but you were wrong...DEAL with it.
I'm totally indifferent to the topic.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 11:49 am
by Lizzy60
AstonishingGrunt wrote: March 25th, 2022, 10:21 am
The Red Pill wrote: March 25th, 2022, 9:44 am If God cannot look upon sin with the least degree of allowance...and no unclean thing can enter the kingdom of God...

Was Kimball really being to harsh? Or was he preparing us for the harsh reality of the litmus test required to enter the Celestial kingdom.

Societies tend to trend downward toward sin and disobedience over time. Just compare the television shows of the 50s, 60s and 70s to today's if you doubt what I am saying.

Maybe we should be less upset at Kimball and adjust our thinking to how God looks at it. There are lessor kingdom's for a reason...but entrance to the Celestial kingdom has eternal unchanging entrance requirements...

...irregardless of what his disobedient children are engaged in at the moment.
Not a word.
Actually, it is a word, although classified as non-standard.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 12:32 pm
by JohnnyL
I think the book causes too much cognitive dissonance in most people.

As has been mentioned, any sin keeps us from returning to HF. Yes, my views of life and sin have changed a lot since I read it, but like many gospel books, it's still a good book. Can I remember anything wrong in it? No.

I, on the other hand, don't like/ feel offended/ am against all these books (and I particularly detest those General Conference talks) about Christ's infinite atonement being so full of love, every dang person and their dog is great and going to heaven! Just "try" a little here and there, attend church and set up chairs for the ward breakfast, you're good. Nope. Doesn't matter who it is, things must be done for that.

For years I read the Book of Mormon (I started young with the awesome Illustrated Readers) for one main purpose--the shock and awe. My least favorite of the series was Jesus visiting the Americas. Ha ha, part of it is the rebuke at reading those words! If I was offended at Jesus' words, I'm not going to throw it out and complain about it. HEY--he even mentions that just the thought of adultery (anyone masturbating ever done that??) is kin to adultery! How offended should we be? Well, just pluck the offended eye out, or cut off the offended hand, right?

A few things could have been made clearer. In both situations (President Kimball and Jesus).

There's a balance to much of it. I felt love in President Kimball's words, and I knew I needed to repent of many things in that list. If nothing else, they were there, I had read them, and I knew.

"Work out your salvation with fear and trembling." I miss that phrase so much in the Church, haven't really heard it for years decades. Perhaps we are generally all too weak to hear it? Oh well, sometimes the scriptures have it, and maybe that should be enough for me...

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 1:05 pm
by nvr
2 And it came to pass that I said unto them that I knew that I had spoken hard things against the wicked, according to the truth; and the righteous have I justified, and testified that they should be lifted up at the last day; wherefore, the guilty taketh the truth to be hard, for it cutteth them to the very center.

3 And now my brethren, if ye were righteous and were willing to hearken to the truth, and give heed unto it , that ye might walk uprightly before God, then ye would not murmur because of the truth, and say: Thou speakest hard things against us .

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 1:35 pm
by Niemand
Rubicon wrote: March 25th, 2022, 8:51 am But, I didn't spend the rest of my life grousing about how his book made me feel like I'll never be free of sin. That's not the message or takeaway I got from it at all. It's dismaying that that is all some people got from it, and again, I think it's more of a mirror into personality types and hangups than it is an indictment of the book.
Funny thing is that I didn't either. I very rarely talk about it. But it was not a good book for me and some people reacted to it far worse than me. People need a way out, and Jesus is that way out. Making the road to Jesus seem harder than it is, is not positive. I do not think it is an easy road, but I believe anyone can follow the Saviour.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 2:38 pm
by Niemand
Robin Hood wrote: March 25th, 2022, 9:15 am I think it was a product of it's time, and of Bro. Kimball's anxiety about the state of the church, meaning the condition of the Saints.
Rightly or wrongly, apostles only tend to deal with ordinary members when there is a problem. And if it gets up as far as the apostles it's a big problem... a very big one.
So Bro. Kimball will be dealing with murder cases, incest, paedophilia and other sexual perversions, industrial scale corruption, drug addiction, prostitution and so on. For a farm boy from Arizona it must have been a real eye opener to realise what a wicked world it is out there, and the toll it is taking on God's people. He is dealing with very serious issues and he feels the need to write the equivalent of a fire and brimstone sermon in order to shake the Saints and wake them up to the seriousness of sin and the depths to which sin can plunge us.
We (the human race) have definitely degenerated since it was written, I'm sure of that. The internet has accelerated that with people openly arguing in favour of some of the disgusting things you mentioned (bestiality too). If you'd done that forty years ago in public, you'd be a pariah and rightly so. Drugs are also everywhere now.

Evil can be a slippery slope, but it was the equation of one or two bad thoughts with far worse that troubles me.

I think sins can be fairly neatly divided into three categories:
* Those that are between us and God, e.g. unexpressed envy, anger etc.
* Those which hurt and harm other people, e.g. false witness, theft, rape etc. Suicide maybe in here.
* Those which involve us endangering another person's salvation or drawing them into our sin: fornication, adultery, deliberately corrupting others.

You can add murder to the last one, because it may have deprived someone of the opportunity of salvation in this life (as well as all the more obvious pain and misery it causes the victims and their loved ones.)

I know the thought is father of the deed etc, but the difference between lust and adultery is that one is a private matter and the second involves at least three people.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 3:19 pm
by LDS Physician
Rubicon wrote: March 25th, 2022, 8:51 am
LDS Physician wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:27 pm
What was it like to read it and not feel guilt, shame, or fear?
What was it like? I repented of things I needed to repent of, and felt my sin burden physically lifted off of my shoulders. His thesis in action --- forgiveness through the atonement is a miracle, and it's real.

But, I didn't spend the rest of my life grousing about how his book made me feel like I'll never be free of sin. That's not the message or takeaway I got from it at all. It's dismaying that that is all some people got from it, and again, I think it's more of a mirror into personality types and hangups than it is an indictment of the book.

Like someone said upthread, it's no wonder that so many in the Church are afraid to speak out against sins like homosexuality. People fly apart like glass and act like we are literally killing people who are suicidal because it's named as a sin. That's the same phenomenon that's going on with MoF hate.
I didn't either. I can just call a spade a spade ... And that book has a lot of spade in it.

And I'm on the same page as you with homosexuality...it's a sin. Society wants to protect it from that status with political correctness, but that's just rationalization. The only issue rationalized more (and even more egregious) is abortion.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 25th, 2022, 3:23 pm
by LDS Physician
spiritMan wrote: March 24th, 2022, 7:48 pm
LDS Physician wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:27 pm
Rubicon wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:23 pm
LDS Physician wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:18 pm
This right here, perfectly said. That book feels like a parent screaming at a 4 year-old child who falls off the bike while learning to ride it. It certainly doesn't reflect the love, mercy, long-suffering, tolerant Savior who looked at the adulteress and asked "Where are your accusers?"
It seems increasingly that the book is more of a mirror reflecting the reader/commenter than anything else. A Rorschach test . . .

A great many people didn't come away from it with anything like the feeling of "a parent screaming at a 4 year-old child who falls off the bike while learning to ride it."
Guess I'm an evil sinner whom God hates ... even my "minor" sins equate to adultery and murder. Fire, hell, brimstone, and gnashing of teeth await me.

What was it like to read it and not feel guilt, shame, or fear?
It's like you guys never read the scriptures. They are full of ripping people a new one....but if it comes from a modern guy that person is bad... SMH no wonder accept queers at the least bit of tough talk people fly to pieces.
Tough talk adulterers, homosexuals and child molesters all you want ... But be a little softer on the 12 year old who masturbated once or looked at a naked photo in a magazine ... Telling them they're worthless and worthy of hellfire isn't anything close to helpful, how the savior would approach it, nor is it appropriate.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 8:29 am
by JohnnyL
LDS Physician wrote: March 25th, 2022, 3:23 pm
spiritMan wrote: March 24th, 2022, 7:48 pm
LDS Physician wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:27 pm
Rubicon wrote: March 24th, 2022, 5:23 pm

It seems increasingly that the book is more of a mirror reflecting the reader/commenter than anything else. A Rorschach test . . .

A great many people didn't come away from it with anything like the feeling of "a parent screaming at a 4 year-old child who falls off the bike while learning to ride it."
Guess I'm an evil sinner whom God hates ... even my "minor" sins equate to adultery and murder. Fire, hell, brimstone, and gnashing of teeth await me.

What was it like to read it and not feel guilt, shame, or fear?
It's like you guys never read the scriptures. They are full of ripping people a new one....but if it comes from a modern guy that person is bad... SMH no wonder accept queers at the least bit of tough talk people fly to pieces.
Tough talk adulterers, homosexuals and child molesters all you want ... But be a little softer on the 12 year old who masturbated once or looked at a naked photo in a magazine ... Telling them they're worthless and worthy of hellfire isn't anything close to helpful, how the savior would approach it, nor is it appropriate.
I must have missed those quotes...

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 8:45 am
by Mindfields
Total shiz. That's what the "It will be a miracle if you're ever forgiven" book is. The damage caused by those buffoons that ran the church in the 70's is incalculable. Clearly a church ran by bunch of men not by God.

Re: Deseret Books did WHAT?!

Posted: March 26th, 2022, 10:36 am
by Thinker
Niemand wrote: March 25th, 2022, 5:24 am
But this book's sentiment seems to be:

Sin is evil,
And evil is sin...
Nothing is well,
You're going to Hell!
:lol:

Image

Who knows - maybe joy transforms hell - like this guy and gal happily skipping through hell...

Image