An excellent read on numerous subjects.

[Original_Intent]

This was long and I didn't feel everything in it was perfect, but there was a TON of things worth at least pondering.

https://www.bomperspectives.com/2022/03 ... 9M_byIKo18

This post will be a rebuttal to Christofferson’s talk, but first I'll explain the communist origins of the UN and the esoteric and satanic symbolism of its logo. Right off the bat we have to know that the talk was designed as propaganda to subtly indoctrinate the LDS people into being more accepting of globalism and international law.

This entire campaign may be an attempt to “inoculate” Latter-day Saints against conservative ideas that dominated the general membership of the Church for so long. Church leaders may be attempting to purge out the last vestiges of the Bensonites, who are radically and justifiably opposed to global government and socialism. There just may be no more room in the Church for these good people.

Throughout his talk Christofferson makes lip service to good principles that are hard to disagree with such as: personal accountability, not trusting in the arm of flesh, integrity, compassion, marriage and fidelity, respect for others and their property, and the necessity and dignity of work. There is nothing wrong with any of these noble concepts, but he omits one very important, and I might add the most important one of all: Free Agency. Never once throughout the entire talk does he suggest that the lofty goals of Agenda 2030 and Zion can be accomplished using our free agency. The talk is completely and strangely silent on personal liberty and freedom. In fact, in one part of the talk he actually advocates against personal liberty:

"A society, for example, in which individual consent is the only restraint on sexual activity is a society in decay."

There are many links throughout the article to other articles and videos that I intend to look into. I'd certainly enjoy hearing anyone's thoughts, pro or con, on all or part of the article.

[EvanLM]

all churches are under attack, not just the puny and little populated mormon church . . . all of the leaders of churches across the world have sold out . . . that is why there was amass exodus at least 10 years ago . . .

and our leaders blamed the exodus from the mormon church on . . . . well, you fill in the blank . . .

[Mamabear]

I believe this talk was Christofferson pandering to both sides. The ones who like agenda 2030 and the ones who don’t. In so doing he revealed their agenda which is to follow it regardless of if Christ is involved or not. Which, He will not be.

[Fred]

This was long and I didn't feel everything in it was perfect, but there was a TON of things worth at least pondering.

https://www.bomperspectives.com/2022/03 ... 9M_byIKo18

This post will be a rebuttal to Christofferson’s talk, but first I'll explain the communist origins of the UN and the esoteric and satanic symbolism of its logo. Right off the bat we have to know that the talk was designed as propaganda to subtly indoctrinate the LDS people into being more accepting of globalism and international law.

This entire campaign may be an attempt to “inoculate” Latter-day Saints against conservative ideas that dominated the general membership of the Church for so long. Church leaders may be attempting to purge out the last vestiges of the Bensonites, who are radically and justifiably opposed to global government and socialism. There just may be no more room in the Church for these good people.

Throughout his talk Christofferson makes lip service to good principles that are hard to disagree with such as: personal accountability, not trusting in the arm of flesh, integrity, compassion, marriage and fidelity, respect for others and their property, and the necessity and dignity of work. There is nothing wrong with any of these noble concepts, but he omits one very important, and I might add the most important one of all: Free Agency. Never once throughout the entire talk does he suggest that the lofty goals of Agenda 2030 and Zion can be accomplished using our free agency. The talk is completely and strangely silent on personal liberty and freedom. In fact, in one part of the talk he actually advocates against personal liberty:

"A society, for example, in which individual consent is the only restraint on sexual activity is a society in decay."

There are many links throughout the article to other articles and videos that I intend to look into. I'd certainly enjoy hearing anyone's thoughts, pro or con, on all or part of the article.

This would mean that not only is the church off the rails, they know it is off the rails and are doing these things on purpose, with full intent to deceive and lead people away from Christ.