Page 1 of 1

Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 6th, 2022, 8:35 pm
by Sarah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media_in_Russia

The organisation Reporters Without Borders compiles and publishes an annual ranking of countries based upon the organisation's assessment of their press freedom records. In 2016 Russia was ranked 148th out of 179 countries, six places below the previous year, mainly due to the return of Vladimir Putin.[7] Freedom House compiles a similar ranking and placed Russia at number 176 out of 197 countries for press freedom for 2013, placing it at the level with Sudan and Ethiopia.[8] The Committee to Protect Journalists states that Russia was the country with the 10th largest number of journalists killed since 1992, 26 of them since the beginning of 2000, including four from Novaya Gazeta.[9] It also placed Russia at number 9 in the world for numbers of journalists killed with complete impunity.[10]

In December 2014, a Russian investigative site published e-mails, leaked by the hackers' group Shaltai Boltai, which indicated close links between Timur Prokopenko [ru], a member of Vladimir Putin's administration, and Russian journalists, some of whom published Kremlin-originated articles under their own names.[11]

The Russian Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press. Yet, restrictive legislation and a politicised judiciary system have made it particularly difficult for independent journalists to work in Russia.[12][13]

The broad definition of extremism in Russia legislation and its use to silence government critics have fostered self-censorship among journalists to prevent harassment.[12] Amendments to the Mass Media Law in the late 2000s have been aimed at limiting the spread of "extremism, terrorism, violence and pornography" as well as the coverage of anti-terrorism operations.[14] However, the 2006 Federal Law on Combating the Terrorism[15] and the 2006 Law on Counteracting the Extremist Activity,[16] along with the Federal List of Extremist Materials, became a matter of concern of both domestic and international observers.[17][18] The Human Rights Committee of the United Nations criticized the lack of precision in the definitions of terrorism and terrorist activity, the counter-terrorist regime being not subject to any requirement of justification, as well as the lack of legal provision for the authorities' obligation to protect human rights in the context of a counter-terrorist operation.[17] The broad definition of extremism in Russian legislation and its use to silence government critics have fostered self-censorship among journalists to prevent harassment.[12]

In 2014 two new laws extended the state control over the internet. According to the Federal Law 398 (February 2014), the prosecutor general may bypass the courts and make use of the federal regulator agency Roskomnadzor to directly block websites in order to prevent mass riots, "extremist" activities and illegal assemblies. In the first year of the law, Roskomnadzor blocked over 85 websites, including Aleksey Navalny's blog on Ekho Moskvy's website (which removed it) as well as the news site Grani.ru, the online magazine Yezhednevny Zhurnal, and Kasparov.ru, the website of the opposition activist Garry Kasparov. In July 2014, the online extremism law was used to prevent a march for Siberian autonomy.[12]

The "bloggers' law" no. 97 (May 2014) required any website with over 3,000 daily visits to register with Roskomnadzor as a media outlet, subjecting personal blogs and other websites to the same restrictions foreseen for major publications – including a ban on anonymous authorship and obscenities, as well as legal responsibility for users' comments. Under a follow-up law passed in July 2014, social networks are required to store their data in Russia in order for them to be accessible by the authorities.

In 2005 a state-run English language Russia Today TV started broadcasting, and its Arabic version Rusiya Al-Yaum was launched in 2007.

TASS, founded in 1904, is a federal, state-owned news agency, working throughout Soviet times as TASS. It has over 500 correspondents and broadcasts in six languages, with 350-650 items daily. In 2010 it was among the four biggest world news agencies (with Reuters, AP and AFP). It has the biggest photo archive in Russia.[23]

RIA Novosti is another state-owned news agency, founded in 1941 as the Soviet Information Bureau and in 1991 turned into the Russian Information Agency (RIA) Novosti with correspondents in 40 countries, and broadcasting in 14 languages.[23]

According to statistics published by UNESCO in 2005, Russia had the largest number of newspaper journalists in the world (102,300), followed by China (82,849) and the United States (54,134),.[24] As of 2008 Russia had over 400 daily newspapers, covering many fields, and offering a range of perspectives.[25] The total number of newspapers in Russia is 8,978, and they have a total annual circulation of 8.2 billion copies. There are also 6,698 magazines and periodicals with a total annual circulation of 1.6 billion copies.[26]

after television, newspapers are the second most popular media in Russia. Local newspapers are more popular than national ones, with 27% of Russians consulting local newspapers routinely and 40% reading them occasionally. For national newspapers, the corresponding figures are 18% and 38%, respectively.[27]

As of 2008, companies close to the Russian government, such as Gazprom, had acquired several of the most influential newspapers;

Three channels have a nationwide outreach (over 90% coverage of the Russian territory): Channel One (a.k.a. First Channel), Russia-1 (a.k.a. Rossiya), and NTV.[38] As stated by the BBC, both Channel One and Russia-1 are controlled by the government, while state-controlled energy giant Gazprom owns NTV.[39]

The English-language satellite channel Russia Today (RT) was launched in 2005. It produces in multiple languages and broadcasts in over 100 countries.[42] A new international multimedia news service called Sputnik was launched in 2014, merging and replacing previous services.[12]

Dozhd (Rain), the only independent TV channel, came under increasing pressure in 2014. After a controversy over a historical poll in January, satellite providers started to drop the channel from their packages – reportedly under Kremlin pressure. In March the CEO announced the insolvency of the station, which still continued operating, with critical reporting on corruption and human rights abuses related to the Sochi Olympics.

In September 2011 Russia overtook Germany on the European market with the highest number of unique visitors online.[50] In March 2013 a survey found that Russian had become the second most commonly used language on the web.[51]

According to Human Rights Watch, the Russian government exerts control over civil society through selective implementation of the law, restriction and censure.[56]

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 6th, 2022, 8:45 pm
by Sarah
While looking this up, just saw the story that RT America is laying off most of it's staff...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_(TV_network)

RT (formerly Russia Today or Rossiya Segodnya)[10] is a Russian state-controlled[1] international television network funded by the tax budget of the Russian government.[17][18] It operates pay television or free-to-air channels directed to audiences outside of Russia, as well as providing Internet content in English, Spanish, French, German, Arabic, and Russian.

RT is a brand of TV-Novosti, an autonomous non-profit organization founded by the Russian state-owned news agency RIA Novosti in April 2005.[8][19] During the economic crisis in December 2008, the Russian government, headed by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, included ANO "TV-Novosti" on its list of core organizations of strategic importance to Russia.[20][21][22] RT operates as a multilingual service with channels in five languages: the original English-language channel was launched in 2005, the Arabic-language channel in 2007, Spanish in 2009, German in 2014 and French in 2017. RT America (2010–2022),[23][24] RT UK (since 2014) and other regional channels also produce local content. RT is the parent company of the Ruptly video agency,[5] which owns the Redfish video channel and the Maffick digital media company.[6][7]

RT has regularly been described as a major propaganda outlet for the Russian government and its foreign policy.[2] Academics, fact-checkers, and news reporters (including some current and former RT reporters) have identified RT as a purveyor of disinformation[59] and conspiracy theories.[65] UK media regulator Ofcom has repeatedly found RT to have breached its rules on impartiality, including multiple instances in which RT broadcast "materially misleading" content.[72]

In 2012, RT's editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan compared the channel to the Russian Ministry of Defence.[73] Referring to the Russo-Georgian War, she stated that it was "waging an information war, and with the entire Western world".[18][74] In September 2017, RT America was ordered to register as a foreign agent with the United States Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.[75]

RT was banned in Ukraine in 2014 after Russia's annexation of Crimea;[76] Latvia and Lithuania implemented similar bans in 2020.[77][78] Germany banned RT DE in February 2022.[79] After the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Poland and then the entire European Union announced they were formally banning RT as well, while independent service providers in over 10 countries suspended broadcasts of RT.[80][81] Social media websites followed by blocking external links to RT's website or restricting access to RT's content.[9][82] Microsoft removed RT from their app store and de-ranked their search results on Bing,[83][84] while Apple removed the RT News app from all countries except for Russia.[85]

In 2008, Simonyan noted that more than 50 young RT journalists had gone on to take positions in large Western media outlets.[97] By 2010, RT's staff had grown to 2,000.[23]

Its annual budget increased from approximately $80 million in 2007 to $380 million in 2011, but was reduced to $300 million in 2012.[159][2][160] President Putin prohibited the reduction of funding for RT on 30 October 2012.[161]

About 80 percent of RT's costs are incurred outside Russia, paying partner networks around $260 million for the distribution of its channels in 2014.[41][162] In 2014, RT received 11.87 billion rubles ($310 million) in government funding and was expected to receive 15.38 billion rubles ($400 million) in 2015.[163] (For comparison, the bigger BBC World Service Group had a $376 million budget in 2014–15.[164]) At the start of 2015, as the ruble's value plummeted and a ten percent reduction in media subsidies was imposed, it was thought that RT's budget for the year would fall to about $236 million.[41][162] Instead, government funding was increased to 20.8 billion rubles (around $300 million) in September.[165] In 2015, RT was expected to receive 19 billion rubles ($307 million) from the Russian government the following year.[166] As of 2022, RT is the leader in terms of state funding among all Russian media. Between 2022 and 2024, RT will receive 82 billion rubles.[167][168]
Network

According to RT, the network's feed is carried by 22 satellites and over 230 operators, providing a distribution reach to about 700 million households in more than 100 countries.[169] RT also stated that RT America was available to 85 million households throughout the United States, as of 2012.[170]

In addition to its main English language channel RT International, RT UK and RT America, RT also runs Arabic-language channel Rusiya Al-Yaum, Spanish language channel Actualidad RT, as well as the RTDoc documentary channel. RT maintains 21 bureaus in 16 countries, including those in Washington, D.C., New York City; London, England; Paris, France; Delhi, India; Cairo, Egypt and Baghdad, Iraq.[3]

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 4:36 am
by Niemand
Russia's media complex is miniscule compared to most developed countries including even Australia.

The BBC's reach is much bigger. It even has news in Pidgin. They try and force people to pay for it. I haven't bought a TV licence in over ten years, but I get disgusting letters from them nearly every month threatening me over it. I have done for years. They are so bad that some Americans in our ward took them home as souvenirs.

I have absolutely nothing against Russia Today being allowed to broadcast in the west. I've watched it occasionally.

Now and then they have decent documentaries. One was about a Spaniard who was building his own cathedral, for instance. To be fair to RT in that case, it had absolutely no propaganda value, and was just an interesting documentary. I saw another documentary about someone who had deserted during the Soviet Afghan War and married an Afghan woman and had family, and then went back to visit his home town to the dismay of his former comrades in arms - there was a political angle there, but it was still a decent human interest story.

Anyone with half a brain can see a lot of it is propaganda, but so are all the other channels, and RT carries some stories that western outlets pretend aren't happening.
Microsoft removed RT from their app store and de-ranked their search results on Bing,[83][84] while Apple removed the RT News app from all countries except for Russia.[85]
This isn't something they should boast about. It is just censorship and removal of one of a number of alternative points of view. Most search engines find precisely nothing these days because of this.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 8:25 am
by Sarah
Niemand wrote: March 7th, 2022, 4:36 am Russia's media complex is miniscule compared to most developed countries including even Australia.

The BBC's reach is much bigger. It even has news in Pidgin. They try and force people to pay for it. I haven't bought a TV licence in over ten years, but I get disgusting letters from them nearly every month threatening me over it. I have done for years. They are so bad that some Americans in our ward took them home as souvenirs.

I have absolutely nothing against Russia Today being allowed to broadcast in the west. I've watched it occasionally.

Now and then they have decent documentaries. One was about a Spaniard who was building his own cathedral, for instance. To be fair to RT in that case, it had absolutely no propaganda value, and was just an interesting documentary. I saw another documentary about someone who had deserted during the Soviet Afghan War and married an Afghan woman and had family, and then went back to visit his home town to the dismay of his former comrades in arms - there was a political angle there, but it was still a decent human interest story.

Anyone with half a brain can see a lot of it is propaganda, but so are all the other channels, and RT carries some stories that western outlets pretend aren't happening.
Microsoft removed RT from their app store and de-ranked their search results on Bing,[83][84] while Apple removed the RT News app from all countries except for Russia.[85]
This isn't something they should boast about. It is just censorship and removal of one of a number of alternative points of view. Most search engines find precisely nothing these days because of this.
The budget for RT and BBC was the same in 2014/15 according to this, and who knows what it's been the last few years, considering that Putin made it illegal to put any cap on their budget. They don't care about reaching people who speak Pidgin, they care about influencing the developed countries.

We have to realize that they knew this was coming because this was part of their plan. Feeling sorry for RT is like feeling sorry for China when Covid first hit them. The world collapse is now in motion, and they have the chance to cut their losses and get out of the system. (China was able to deal with it first which helped set the tone for the rest of the world's response)

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 8:35 am
by Vision
Sarah wrote: March 7th, 2022, 8:25 am
Niemand wrote: March 7th, 2022, 4:36 am Russia's media complex is miniscule compared to most developed countries including even Australia.

The BBC's reach is much bigger. It even has news in Pidgin. They try and force people to pay for it. I haven't bought a TV licence in over ten years, but I get disgusting letters from them nearly every month threatening me over it. I have done for years. They are so bad that some Americans in our ward took them home as souvenirs.

I have absolutely nothing against Russia Today being allowed to broadcast in the west. I've watched it occasionally.

Now and then they have decent documentaries. One was about a Spaniard who was building his own cathedral, for instance. To be fair to RT in that case, it had absolutely no propaganda value, and was just an interesting documentary. I saw another documentary about someone who had deserted during the Soviet Afghan War and married an Afghan woman and had family, and then went back to visit his home town to the dismay of his former comrades in arms - there was a political angle there, but it was still a decent human interest story.

Anyone with half a brain can see a lot of it is propaganda, but so are all the other channels, and RT carries some stories that western outlets pretend aren't happening.
Microsoft removed RT from their app store and de-ranked their search results on Bing,[83][84] while Apple removed the RT News app from all countries except for Russia.[85]
This isn't something they should boast about. It is just censorship and removal of one of a number of alternative points of view. Most search engines find precisely nothing these days because of this.
The budget for RT and BBC was the same in 2014/15 according to this, and who knows what it's been the last few years, considering that Putin made it illegal to put any cap on their budget. They don't care about reaching people who speak Pidgin, they care about influencing the developed countries.

We have to realize that they knew this was coming because this was part of their plan. Feeling sorry for RT is like feeling sorry for China when Covid first hit them. The world collapse is now in motion, and they have the chance to cut their losses and get out of the system. (China was able to deal with it first which helped set the tone for the rest of the world's response)
Sarah how many sides are on this round planet that we both live on?

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 9:03 am
by Sarah
Vision wrote: March 7th, 2022, 8:35 am
Sarah wrote: March 7th, 2022, 8:25 am
Niemand wrote: March 7th, 2022, 4:36 am Russia's media complex is miniscule compared to most developed countries including even Australia.

The BBC's reach is much bigger. It even has news in Pidgin. They try and force people to pay for it. I haven't bought a TV licence in over ten years, but I get disgusting letters from them nearly every month threatening me over it. I have done for years. They are so bad that some Americans in our ward took them home as souvenirs.

I have absolutely nothing against Russia Today being allowed to broadcast in the west. I've watched it occasionally.

Now and then they have decent documentaries. One was about a Spaniard who was building his own cathedral, for instance. To be fair to RT in that case, it had absolutely no propaganda value, and was just an interesting documentary. I saw another documentary about someone who had deserted during the Soviet Afghan War and married an Afghan woman and had family, and then went back to visit his home town to the dismay of his former comrades in arms - there was a political angle there, but it was still a decent human interest story.

Anyone with half a brain can see a lot of it is propaganda, but so are all the other channels, and RT carries some stories that western outlets pretend aren't happening.
Microsoft removed RT from their app store and de-ranked their search results on Bing,[83][84] while Apple removed the RT News app from all countries except for Russia.[85]
This isn't something they should boast about. It is just censorship and removal of one of a number of alternative points of view. Most search engines find precisely nothing these days because of this.
The budget for RT and BBC was the same in 2014/15 according to this, and who knows what it's been the last few years, considering that Putin made it illegal to put any cap on their budget. They don't care about reaching people who speak Pidgin, they care about influencing the developed countries.

We have to realize that they knew this was coming because this was part of their plan. Feeling sorry for RT is like feeling sorry for China when Covid first hit them. The world collapse is now in motion, and they have the chance to cut their losses and get out of the system. (China was able to deal with it first which helped set the tone for the rest of the world's response)
Sarah how many sides are on this round planet that we both live on?
Some conspiracy theories are true 😁
Some...are not 🌎🌍🌏

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 10:36 am
by djinwa
What’s your point? Did someone say Russia has complete freedom?

I would say all governments spew propaganda. Do you believe all our government says? All truth about Covid , Iraq, Afghanistan? No censorship here?

The Ukraine conflict isn’t that complicated. We would not tolerate Russia putting missiles near us and Russia doesn’t like us doing the same.

The irony is that while we claim superior morality as a righteous Christian nation, we ignore the Golden Rule.

One of the greatest moments in political history, Ron Paul fighting for the Golden Rule against the supposedly righteous:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AD7dnFDdwu0

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 11:34 am
by mudflap
djinwa wrote: March 7th, 2022, 10:36 am What’s your point? Did someone say Russia has complete freedom?

I would say all governments spew propaganda. Do you believe all our government says? All truth about Covid , Iraq, Afghanistan? No censorship here?

The Ukraine conflict isn’t that complicated. We would not tolerate Russia putting missiles near us and Russia doesn’t like us doing the same.

The irony is that while we claim superior morality as a righteous Christian nation, we ignore the Golden Rule.

One of the greatest moments in political history, Ron Paul fighting for the Golden Rule against the supposedly righteous:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AD7dnFDdwu0
uh-oh - you said "Ron Paul".....

As for the propaganda - 100% correct.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 11:52 am
by BroJones
Sarah: "Russia was ranked 148th out of 179 countries, six places below the previous year, mainly due to the return of Vladimir Putin.[7] Freedom House compiles a similar ranking and placed Russia at number 176 out of 197 countries for press freedom for 2013, placing it at the level with Sudan and Ethiopia.[8] The Committee to Protect Journalists states that Russia was the country with the 10th largest number of journalists killed since 1992, 26 of them since the beginning of 2000, including four from Novaya Gazeta.[9] It also placed Russia at number 9 in the world for numbers of journalists killed with complete impunity.[10]...

The Russian Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press."

The US Constitution does the same. How does the US rank with respect to press freedom?

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 12:16 pm
by Sarah
BroJones wrote: March 7th, 2022, 11:52 am Sarah: "Russia was ranked 148th out of 179 countries, six places below the previous year, mainly due to the return of Vladimir Putin.[7] Freedom House compiles a similar ranking and placed Russia at number 176 out of 197 countries for press freedom for 2013, placing it at the level with Sudan and Ethiopia.[8] The Committee to Protect Journalists states that Russia was the country with the 10th largest number of journalists killed since 1992, 26 of them since the beginning of 2000, including four from Novaya Gazeta.[9] It also placed Russia at number 9 in the world for numbers of journalists killed with complete impunity.[10]...

The Russian Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press."

The US Constitution does the same. How does the US rank with respect to press freedom?
The US media complex at least allows for a myriad of voices, unlike Russia. And Putin has used our freedom of the press against us. His propaganda networks and paid agitators have taken over our conservative leaning media here, while the leftist media has been brainwashed into thinking the true threat are people like Trump, who are nationalist, right-leaning deluded Christian conservatives who not only are racist, sexist, or homophobic, but are also conspiracy theorists who listen to Russian propaganda. Putin has created the madness and lies on both sides, to divide and conquer America. His goal has been to make the Repubs or Libs, the conservatives or liberals, the only good vs. evil fight. So no, I don't think that the US media is free from evil influence, but at least our government does not use billions of tax-payer dollars and oil money to fund a propaganda media machine.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 12:27 pm
by Sarah
djinwa wrote: March 7th, 2022, 10:36 am What’s your point? Did someone say Russia has complete freedom?

I would say all governments spew propaganda. Do you believe all our government says? All truth about Covid , Iraq, Afghanistan? No censorship here?

The Ukraine conflict isn’t that complicated. We would not tolerate Russia putting missiles near us and Russia doesn’t like us doing the same.

The irony is that while we claim superior morality as a righteous Christian nation, we ignore the Golden Rule.

One of the greatest moments in political history, Ron Paul fighting for the Golden Rule against the supposedly righteous:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AD7dnFDdwu0
I'd invite you to read through all my posts over the last few weeks to understand my point. It should be obvious by now, as I've repeated myself multiple times. But people would rather block me than listen I guess.

No, I don't believe everything our government says. I've been arguing that our top Western leaders are Putin's puppets whether they are fully in the know or not.
No I don't believe everything they've said about Covid, Afghanistan, Iraq or whatever else. These are wars to lead to the weakening of the West, and the strengthening of the East, in order that the East can collapse and conquer the West.

You say we would not tolerate Russia putting nukes next door, and I would say, sure, we probably would throw a fit about it like we did when Russia placed 150,000 troops on the border of Ukraine. But we would never actually do anything about it because we are too scared of Russia. We are happy to try to oust a dictator, which always backfires and leads to Russia and China gaining more influence in the area we meddle with, but won't put our full strength against Russia until it's too late. The whole world is going to be cut off of oil here pretty soon.

Ron Paul is a compromised opportunist, and I would argue that if he's preaching the Golden Rule, he should go preach it to Putin who is murdering thousands of innocent people in Ukraine and among his own troops who had no idea what they were walking into.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 12:39 pm
by Sarah
I will say though, that Giuliani is definitely worse than Ron Paul. I agree with with Ron Paul is saying, but he just hasn't made the connection apparently that these traitors in our highest levels of government are pushing interventionism as part of the communist conspiracy to create hatred in the Middle East for the US, and a reason for Putin and Xi to come in after we leave, with offers of guns and money.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 1:04 pm
by Sarah
djinwa wrote: March 7th, 2022, 10:36 am What’s your point? Did someone say Russia has complete freedom?

I would say all governments spew propaganda. Do you believe all our government says? All truth about Covid , Iraq, Afghanistan? No censorship here?

The Ukraine conflict isn’t that complicated. We would not tolerate Russia putting missiles near us and Russia doesn’t like us doing the same.

The irony is that while we claim superior morality as a righteous Christian nation, we ignore the Golden Rule.

One of the greatest moments in political history, Ron Paul fighting for the Golden Rule against the supposedly righteous:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AD7dnFDdwu0
The point of me showing you how big is the Russian government's media arm, is to help you realize that everything they say is going to be manipulative and deceptive, because Putin and the Kremlin do have an agenda and a long history of performing disinformation campaigns.

I just watched this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ4hvLqNfqo&t=1460s

I don't agree with his final assessment necessarily, but I think he does a good job simplifying the Russian narrative and why it doesn't make sense.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 4:02 pm
by Niemand
Sarah wrote: March 7th, 2022, 8:25 am
Niemand wrote: March 7th, 2022, 4:36 am Russia's media complex is miniscule compared to most developed countries including even Australia.

The BBC's reach is much bigger. It even has news in Pidgin. They try and force people to pay for it. I haven't bought a TV licence in over ten years, but I get disgusting letters from them nearly every month threatening me over it. I have done for years. They are so bad that some Americans in our ward took them home as souvenirs.

I have absolutely nothing against Russia Today being allowed to broadcast in the west. I've watched it occasionally.

Now and then they have decent documentaries. One was about a Spaniard who was building his own cathedral, for instance. To be fair to RT in that case, it had absolutely no propaganda value, and was just an interesting documentary. I saw another documentary about someone who had deserted during the Soviet Afghan War and married an Afghan woman and had family, and then went back to visit his home town to the dismay of his former comrades in arms - there was a political angle there, but it was still a decent human interest story.

Anyone with half a brain can see a lot of it is propaganda, but so are all the other channels, and RT carries some stories that western outlets pretend aren't happening.
Microsoft removed RT from their app store and de-ranked their search results on Bing,[83][84] while Apple removed the RT News app from all countries except for Russia.[85]
This isn't something they should boast about. It is just censorship and removal of one of a number of alternative points of view. Most search engines find precisely nothing these days because of this.
The budget for RT and BBC was the same in 2014/15 according to this, and who knows what it's been the last few years, considering that Putin made it illegal to put any cap on their budget. They don't care about reaching people who speak Pidgin, they care about influencing the developed countries.

We have to realize that they knew this was coming because this was part of their plan. Feeling sorry for RT is like feeling sorry for China when Covid first hit them. The world collapse is now in motion, and they have the chance to cut their losses and get out of the system. (China was able to deal with it first which helped set the tone for the rest of the world's response)
I seriously doubt it. A few years ago, probably still, the BBC had the biggest website in Europe. The BBC also does a lot of sports coverage, drama incl. soap operas,.comedy and so on and so on. RT doesn't as far as I can tell.

I don't hear Russian radio here. You used to during the Cold War, but not nowadays. On the other hand you can get the BBC World Service practically everywhere. It's one of the biggest state broadcasters out there. If you watch RT news, it is fairly obvious it runs on a fraction of the budget of the BBC's

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 4:53 pm
by NeveR
Sarah wrote: March 7th, 2022, 12:16 pm
The US media complex at least allows for a myriad of voices, unlike Russia.


🤣🤣🤣A myriad of voices all saying the same thing! Like Chomsky says, the trick is to allow fierce 'debate' within a very limited spectrum of opinion, thus giving the impression of free speech. But look at the massive range of fact and opinion that NEVER makes it into our political discourse.

Until recently Russian news probably carried a wider range of opinion than ours. They even have the Moscow Times, a US-run anti-Putin news outlet that publishes in English. But in recent years the crack down has really begun.

Authoritarianism is coming to all of us. If you think we still live in a free society you aren't paying attention. And it's getting worse every day.

PS - RT is currently being shut down in Europe. It's Telegram channel has been removed and I think most EU countries have blocked access to its website and TV channel.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 5:12 pm
by Sarah
NeveR wrote: March 7th, 2022, 4:53 pm
Sarah wrote: March 7th, 2022, 12:16 pm
The US media complex at least allows for a myriad of voices, unlike Russia.


🤣🤣🤣A myriad of voices all saying the same thing! Like Chomsky says, the trick is to allow fierce 'debate' within a very limited spectrum of opinion, thus giving the impression of free speech. But look at the massive range of fact and opinion that NEVER makes it into our political discourse.

Until recently Russian news probably carried a wider range of opinion than ours. They even have the Moscow Times, a US-run anti-Putin news outlet that publishes in English. But in recent years the crack down has really begun.

Authoritarianism is coming to all of us. If you think we still live in a free society you aren't paying attention. And it's getting worse every day.
No doubt there is corruption in our media, and lies, but the rule of law here in the US and protections for free speech is greater than in Russia. You can access thousands of voices that are critical of the US government here in the US, but how many can you access in Russia? It doesn't matter what is supposedly written in Russian law, or what appears to be "opposition." Anyone critical of the government can only say what the Kremlin wants them to say, or they will revoke your license at the very least, or lock you in jail labeling you as an extremist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_ ... _in_Russia

Internet censorship in the Russian Federation is enforced on the basis of several laws and through several mechanisms. Since 2012, Russia maintains a centralized internet blacklist (known as the "single register") maintained by the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor). The list is used for the censorship of individual URLs, domain names, and IP addresses. It was originally introduced to block sites that contain materials advocating drug abuse and drug production, descriptions of suicide methods, and containing child pornography. It was subsequently amended to allow the blocking of materials that are classified as extremist by including them to the Federal List of Extremist Materials.[1] According to Freedom House, these regulations have been frequently abused to block criticism of the federal government or local administrations.[2][3] A law prohibiting "abuse of mass media freedom" implements a process for the shutting down of online media outlets.[2] In March 2019 the bill which introduced fines for those who are deemed (by the government) to be spreading "fake news" and show "blatant disrespect" toward the state authorities was signed into law.[note 1]

In June 2020, the European Court of Human Rights ruled against Russia in a case involving the blocking of websites critical of the government (including that of Garry Kasparov), as the plaintiffs' freedom of speech had been violated.[8]

Russia was on Reporters Without Borders list of countries under surveillance from 2010 to 2013[18] and was moved to the Internet Enemies list in 2014.[19]

Russia was found to engage in selective Internet filtering in the political and social areas and evidence of filtering was found in the conflict/security and Internet tools areas by the OpenNet Initiative in December 2010.[20]

Since at least 2015, Russia collaborates with Chinese Great Firewall security officials in implementing its data retention and filtering infrastructure.[21][22][23]

In September 2019, Roskomnadzor began installing equipment to isolate Russia, including mobile phones, from the rest of the Internet in the event the government directs such action, as required by a law taking effect in November 2019. The government's justification was to counteract potential cyber attacks from the United States, but some worried it might create an online "iron curtain".[24]

As of late February 2022, two of the world's leading social media platforms Facebook and Twitter have been restricted in Russia by Roskomnadzor as a wartime measure amid the invasion of Ukraine.[25][26][27][28] Internet rights monitor NetBlocks reported that Twitter and Facebook platforms were restricted, or throttled, across multiple providers on 26 February and 27 February respectively, with the bans becoming near-total by 4 March.[25][26]

Roskomnadzor, along with several other agencies such as the Federal Drug Control Service, the Federal Consumer Protection Service, and the office of the Prosecutor General, can block certain classes of content without a court order: Calls for unsanctioned public actions, content deemed extremist, materials that violate copyright, information about juvenile victims of crime, child abuse imagery, information encouraging the use of drugs, and descriptions of suicide.[29] Other content can be blocked with a court order.[29]

Internet service providers (ISPs) are held legally responsible for any illegal content that is accessible to their users (intermediary liability).[29]

Increase in Internet censorship

According to data published by the Russian Society for Internet Users founded by members of the Presidential Council for Human Rights, instances of censorship increased by a factor of 1.5 from 2013 to 2014. The incidents documented include not only instances of Internet blocking but also the use of force to shut down Internet users, such as beatings of bloggers or police raids.[43]

Human rights NGO Agora reported that instances of Internet censorship increased ninefold from 2014 to 2015, rising from 1,019 to 9,022.[44]

In April 2018, a Moscow court ordered the ban and blockage of the messaging app Telegram under anti-terrorism laws, for refusing to cooperate with the FSB and provide access to encrypted communications.[45][46] Sales of virtual private network services increased significantly in the wake of the ban.[47]

The FSB has also started lobbying against any "external" satellite Internet access initiatives, including proposals to introduce stricter controls against satellite Internet receivers,[48] as well as opposition against Roskosmos taking orders to bring OneWeb satellites to space.[49]

In December 2018, Google was fined 500,000 rubles for not removing blacklisted sites from its search results.[50]

In March 2019, legislation was passed to ban the publication of "unreliable socially significant information", and materials that show "clear disrespect" for the Russian Federation or "bodies exercising state power".[51] Russian media freedom watchdog Roskomsvoboda reported that a number of people were charged with administrative fines for simply sharing a video about insufficient school places in Krasnodar Krai on their Facebook pages, because the video was authored by "Open Russia", who is considered an "undesirable organization" by Russian authorities.[52] The watchdog also noted an increasing trend of law enforcement using article 20.33 of the administrative violations code ("undesirable organizations"), which seems to be gradually replacing article 282 of the criminal code ("extremism") as the primary censorship instrument.[53]

n April 2021 Roscomnadzor started enforcing throttling of Twitter traffic in Russia. The throttling was implemented with detection of domains t.co, twimg.com, and twitter.com wrapped in wildcards. Target website domains are being detected mostly in Server Name Indication part of TLS handshake. The latter resulted in throttling of all domains that contained "t.co" substring, including microsoft.com etc. (An example of the Scunthorpe problem)[54] TLS extensions that would prevent censorship using SNI, such as Encrypted SNI, were already blocked in 2020.[55]
See also: Server Name Indication § Encrypted Client Hello

In July 2021 GlobalCheck project, which monitors the actual scale and efficiency of the censorship, for the first time noticed widespread use of deep packet inspection (DPI) across large mobile providers which resulted in Navalny-related domains being efficiently blocked across around 50% of Russian networks.[56] The DPI solution, called TSPU (Russian: ТСПУ, технические средства противодействия угрозам, English: technical measures for threat protection), has been introduced in 2019 legislation that also proposed isolation of Russian segment of the Internet.[57][58][59] The change, passed under the rationale of protecting Russian network from external attacks, has been described by activists as actually introduced with intention of strengthening the content censorship that has proven ineffective in many cases in the past.[60]

Blocking Tor

In November 2021 users in Russia started reporting issues with accessing Tor, while Roskomnadzor published an announcement on introduction of centralized blocking of "means of circumvention" of censorship.[70]

In December 2021, the Washington Post together with dissident authors Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan, accused the US-based companies Keysight Technologies and Super Micro Computer, Inc., and Sino-American Lenovo of supplying 60 servers and several Internet traffic analysis solutions to the Moscow control center for Internet censorship in Russia.[71]

A number of individual instances of censorship were taken by Russian citizens to the European Court of Human Rights (Vladimir Kharitonov v. Russia, OOO Flavus and Others v. Russia, Engels v. Russia) and in 2020 ruled that actions of Russian law enforcement in these cases was in clear violation of articles 10 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights.[81]

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 5:21 pm
by Sarah
Niemand wrote: March 7th, 2022, 4:02 pm
Sarah wrote: March 7th, 2022, 8:25 am
Niemand wrote: March 7th, 2022, 4:36 am Russia's media complex is miniscule compared to most developed countries including even Australia.

The BBC's reach is much bigger. It even has news in Pidgin. They try and force people to pay for it. I haven't bought a TV licence in over ten years, but I get disgusting letters from them nearly every month threatening me over it. I have done for years. They are so bad that some Americans in our ward took them home as souvenirs.

I have absolutely nothing against Russia Today being allowed to broadcast in the west. I've watched it occasionally.

Now and then they have decent documentaries. One was about a Spaniard who was building his own cathedral, for instance. To be fair to RT in that case, it had absolutely no propaganda value, and was just an interesting documentary. I saw another documentary about someone who had deserted during the Soviet Afghan War and married an Afghan woman and had family, and then went back to visit his home town to the dismay of his former comrades in arms - there was a political angle there, but it was still a decent human interest story.

Anyone with half a brain can see a lot of it is propaganda, but so are all the other channels, and RT carries some stories that western outlets pretend aren't happening.
Microsoft removed RT from their app store and de-ranked their search results on Bing,[83][84] while Apple removed the RT News app from all countries except for Russia.[85]
This isn't something they should boast about. It is just censorship and removal of one of a number of alternative points of view. Most search engines find precisely nothing these days because of this.
The budget for RT and BBC was the same in 2014/15 according to this, and who knows what it's been the last few years, considering that Putin made it illegal to put any cap on their budget. They don't care about reaching people who speak Pidgin, they care about influencing the developed countries.

We have to realize that they knew this was coming because this was part of their plan. Feeling sorry for RT is like feeling sorry for China when Covid first hit them. The world collapse is now in motion, and they have the chance to cut their losses and get out of the system. (China was able to deal with it first which helped set the tone for the rest of the world's response)
I seriously doubt it. A few years ago, probably still, the BBC had the biggest website in Europe. The BBC also does a lot of sports coverage, drama incl. soap operas,.comedy and so on and so on. RT doesn't as far as I can tell.

I don't hear Russian radio here. You used to during the Cold War, but not nowadays. On the other hand you can get the BBC World Service practically everywhere. It's one of the biggest state broadcasters out there. If you watch RT news, it is fairly obvious it runs on a fraction of the budget of the BBC's
RT is only one small part of their media empire...I'm not trying to argue that RT is bigger than the BBC or the largest in the world, just saying that they are majorly funded by the Russian government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media_in_Russia

According to statistics published by UNESCO in 2005, Russia had the largest number of newspaper journalists in the world (102,300), followed by China (82,849) and the United States (54,134),.[24] As of 2008 Russia had over 400 daily newspapers, covering many fields, and offering a range of perspectives.[25] The total number of newspapers in Russia is 8,978, and they have a total annual circulation of 8.2 billion copies. There are also 6,698 magazines and periodicals with a total annual circulation of 1.6 billion copies.[26]

after television, newspapers are the second most popular media in Russia. Local newspapers are more popular than national ones, with 27% of Russians consulting local newspapers routinely and 40% reading them occasionally. For national newspapers, the corresponding figures are 18% and 38%, respectively.[27]

As of 2008, companies close to the Russian government, such as Gazprom, had acquired several of the most influential newspapers; however, the national press market still offers its consumers a more diverse range of views than those same consumers can sample on the country's leading television channels.[28] Major Russian newspapers with foreign owners include the Vedomosti and SmartMoney owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.[29] A number of American editions (such as GQ) have Russian versions. An October 2014 law limited to 20% the maximum quota of foreign ownership in the Russian media by 2017. This will affect independent publications such as Vedomosti and Forbes Russia.[12]

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 5:45 pm
by Sarah

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 7th, 2022, 6:24 pm
by Sarah

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 8th, 2022, 5:30 am
by Niemand
If you are talking about the state broadcaster, it is pretty normal for most countries to have one. The USA is the exception, not the rule. These broadcasters tend to exist to push soft power.

They are funded using a variety of models. Off the top of my head:
* TV licence - UK
* TV licence plus ads - Ireland (many smaller countries)
* Radio & TV licence - formerly UK
* Radio & TV licence plus ads - Israel
* Tax - Australia
* Tax plus ads - Russia, Isle of Man (60% self-funded, plus 40% bloc grant), smaller countries, Qatar? (Al Jazeera)
* Advertising - rare.

They also vary in how much the government pretends to control them. In the case of the BBC, while it pretends to have nothing to do with the British government, even though it is subject to their rules and, it also pushes all its military and foreign policy agendas, and does not criticise the Royal Family.

One can argue against Putin's influence on this, but it is a pretty normal model for broadcasting in many countries. In Israel, Netanyahu went and abolished the national broadcaster and replaced it with a more loyal one. There are plenty of other examples.

I find the BBC unwatchable for news now. My interest in RT, Al Jazeera etc is to hear another account of events, which is not the one I get hammered into me 24/7. That doesn't necessarily mean I agree with it, but sometimes when you join the dots, you can learn new things.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 8th, 2022, 8:15 am
by Sarah
Niemand wrote: March 8th, 2022, 5:30 am If you are talking about the state broadcaster, it is pretty normal for most countries to have one. The USA is the exception, not the rule. These broadcasters tend to exist to push soft power.

They are funded using a variety of models. Off the top of my head:
* TV licence - UK
* TV licence plus ads - Ireland (many smaller countries)
* Radio & TV licence - formerly UK
* Radio & TV licence plus ads - Israel
* Tax - Australia
* Tax plus ads - Russia, Isle of Man (60% self-funded, plus 40% bloc grant), smaller countries, Qatar? (Al Jazeera)
* Advertising - rare.

They also vary in how much the government pretends to control them. In the case of the BBC, while it pretends to have nothing to do with the British government, even though it is subject to their rules and, it also pushes all its military and foreign policy agendas, and does not criticise the Royal Family.

One can argue against Putin's influence on this, but it is a pretty normal model for broadcasting in many countries. In Israel, Netanyahu went and abolished the national broadcaster and replaced it with a more loyal one. There are plenty of other examples.

I find the BBC unwatchable for news now. My interest in RT, Al Jazeera etc is to hear another account of events, which is not the one I get hammered into me 24/7. That doesn't necessarily mean I agree with it, but sometimes when you join the dots, you can learn new things.
RT, Sputnik, Tass and a lot of commentators connected to these government outlets, have a major presence in American alt-right media, and influence the narrative within all conservatives circles. I'm simply trying to help people be aware of how much they are listening to and believing the narrative coming straight from a murderous dictator.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 8th, 2022, 9:32 am
by Niemand
Sarah wrote: March 8th, 2022, 8:15 am
Niemand wrote: March 8th, 2022, 5:30 am If you are talking about the state broadcaster, it is pretty normal for most countries to have one. The USA is the exception, not the rule. These broadcasters tend to exist to push soft power.

They are funded using a variety of models. Off the top of my head:
* TV licence - UK
* TV licence plus ads - Ireland (many smaller countries)
* Radio & TV licence - formerly UK
* Radio & TV licence plus ads - Israel
* Tax - Australia
* Tax plus ads - Russia, Isle of Man (60% self-funded, plus 40% bloc grant), smaller countries, Qatar? (Al Jazeera)
* Advertising - rare.

They also vary in how much the government pretends to control them. In the case of the BBC, while it pretends to have nothing to do with the British government, even though it is subject to their rules and, it also pushes all its military and foreign policy agendas, and does not criticise the Royal Family.

One can argue against Putin's influence on this, but it is a pretty normal model for broadcasting in many countries. In Israel, Netanyahu went and abolished the national broadcaster and replaced it with a more loyal one. There are plenty of other examples.

I find the BBC unwatchable for news now. My interest in RT, Al Jazeera etc is to hear another account of events, which is not the one I get hammered into me 24/7. That doesn't necessarily mean I agree with it, but sometimes when you join the dots, you can learn new things.
RT, Sputnik, Tass and a lot of commentators connected to these government outlets, have a major presence in American alt-right media, and influence the narrative within all conservatives circles. I'm simply trying to help people be aware of how much they are listening to and believing the narrative coming straight from a murderous dictator.
I don't see why they can't. The west has been beaming radio into Russia for decades now of vastly varying value and factual accuracy. You can also see the BBC which promotes dubious viewpoints on certain matters, Al Jazeera which promotes ?Qatar's viewpoint and one can get China's viewpoint via the Hollywood studios.

The point of free speech is that multiple viewpoints should have a say excepting libellous stuff.

People should also keep a critical ability to dissect what's in front of them whether it's RT, CNN, or the latest attempts by the world's governments to undermine own civil rights.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 8th, 2022, 9:52 am
by Sarah
Niemand wrote: March 8th, 2022, 9:32 am
Sarah wrote: March 8th, 2022, 8:15 am
Niemand wrote: March 8th, 2022, 5:30 am If you are talking about the state broadcaster, it is pretty normal for most countries to have one. The USA is the exception, not the rule. These broadcasters tend to exist to push soft power.

They are funded using a variety of models. Off the top of my head:
* TV licence - UK
* TV licence plus ads - Ireland (many smaller countries)
* Radio & TV licence - formerly UK
* Radio & TV licence plus ads - Israel
* Tax - Australia
* Tax plus ads - Russia, Isle of Man (60% self-funded, plus 40% bloc grant), smaller countries, Qatar? (Al Jazeera)
* Advertising - rare.

They also vary in how much the government pretends to control them. In the case of the BBC, while it pretends to have nothing to do with the British government, even though it is subject to their rules and, it also pushes all its military and foreign policy agendas, and does not criticise the Royal Family.

One can argue against Putin's influence on this, but it is a pretty normal model for broadcasting in many countries. In Israel, Netanyahu went and abolished the national broadcaster and replaced it with a more loyal one. There are plenty of other examples.

I find the BBC unwatchable for news now. My interest in RT, Al Jazeera etc is to hear another account of events, which is not the one I get hammered into me 24/7. That doesn't necessarily mean I agree with it, but sometimes when you join the dots, you can learn new things.
RT, Sputnik, Tass and a lot of commentators connected to these government outlets, have a major presence in American alt-right media, and influence the narrative within all conservatives circles. I'm simply trying to help people be aware of how much they are listening to and believing the narrative coming straight from a murderous dictator.
I don't see why they can't. The west has been beaming radio into Russia for decades now of vastly varying value and factual accuracy. You can also see the BBC which promotes dubious viewpoints on certain matters, Al Jazeera which promotes ?Qatar's viewpoint and one can get China's viewpoint via the Hollywood studios.

The point of free speech is that multiple viewpoints should have a say excepting libellous stuff.

People should also keep a critical ability to dissect what's in front of them whether it's RT, CNN, or the latest attempts by the world's governments to undermine own civil rights.
I agree, that's why you should go tell that to Putin, because obviously he is heavily restricting what citizens in his own country are exposed to.
Nothing wrong with listening to all sides, just pointing out that the side people thought was exposing all the evil in the world, was a narrative coming from a authoritarian who has been plotting for decades to take over your country and your land. The narrative he and his fellow conspirators offer only demonizes the West, but fails to convey that they have been manipulating and subverting the West to obtain this idea of the West victimizing Russia and China and all their friends. It is a controlled opposition operation.

Re: Russia's Massive Media Complex

Posted: March 8th, 2022, 10:04 am
by Niemand
Sarah wrote: March 8th, 2022, 9:52 am
Niemand wrote: March 8th, 2022, 9:32 am
Sarah wrote: March 8th, 2022, 8:15 am
Niemand wrote: March 8th, 2022, 5:30 am If you are talking about the state broadcaster, it is pretty normal for most countries to have one. The USA is the exception, not the rule. These broadcasters tend to exist to push soft power.

They are funded using a variety of models. Off the top of my head:
* TV licence - UK
* TV licence plus ads - Ireland (many smaller countries)
* Radio & TV licence - formerly UK
* Radio & TV licence plus ads - Israel
* Tax - Australia
* Tax plus ads - Russia, Isle of Man (60% self-funded, plus 40% bloc grant), smaller countries, Qatar? (Al Jazeera)
* Advertising - rare.

They also vary in how much the government pretends to control them. In the case of the BBC, while it pretends to have nothing to do with the British government, even though it is subject to their rules and, it also pushes all its military and foreign policy agendas, and does not criticise the Royal Family.

One can argue against Putin's influence on this, but it is a pretty normal model for broadcasting in many countries. In Israel, Netanyahu went and abolished the national broadcaster and replaced it with a more loyal one. There are plenty of other examples.

I find the BBC unwatchable for news now. My interest in RT, Al Jazeera etc is to hear another account of events, which is not the one I get hammered into me 24/7. That doesn't necessarily mean I agree with it, but sometimes when you join the dots, you can learn new things.
RT, Sputnik, Tass and a lot of commentators connected to these government outlets, have a major presence in American alt-right media, and influence the narrative within all conservatives circles. I'm simply trying to help people be aware of how much they are listening to and believing the narrative coming straight from a murderous dictator.
I don't see why they can't. The west has been beaming radio into Russia for decades now of vastly varying value and factual accuracy. You can also see the BBC which promotes dubious viewpoints on certain matters, Al Jazeera which promotes ?Qatar's viewpoint and one can get China's viewpoint via the Hollywood studios.

The point of free speech is that multiple viewpoints should have a say excepting libellous stuff.

People should also keep a critical ability to dissect what's in front of them whether it's RT, CNN, or the latest attempts by the world's governments to undermine own civil rights.
I agree, that's why you should go tell that to Putin, because obviously he is heavily restricting what citizens in his own country are exposed to.
Nothing wrong with listening to all sides, just pointing out that the side people thought was exposing all the evil in the world, was a narrative coming from a authoritarian who has been plotting for decades to take over your country and your land. The narrative he and his fellow conspirators offer only demonizes the West, but fails to convey that they have been manipulating and subverting the West to obtain this idea of the West victimizing Russia and China and all their friends. It is a controlled opposition operation.
Arthur Koestler back in the Cold War days proposed that there should be a deal that Pravda and Izvestia should be freely available in the west and Time etc should be available behind the Iron Curtain. It never happened of course, but I like the idea.

The same should apply with modern Russia, that western publications and shows should be available there and vice versa.

However, one caveat is that I'm not unsympathetic to the Russians' wish not to be bombarded with trans recruitment ads all the time.

I know that there are some aspects I will never hear about. Ukrainian media won't talk about Hunter Biden. Russian media won't talk about Russian investments there. British media won't discuss spying etc. But you can read between the lines. I remember hearing about a British man that the Russians wanted to deport some years ago, and even with the BBC spin on the matter, the man sounded like an agent. You can also glean some Russian motives by what they talk about outside Russia.