Page 1 of 1
WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 6:13 pm
by Subcomandante
https://www.climatedepot.com/2021/12/01 ... -outbreak/
This is DEFINITELY not good.
THIS is the mechanism from which the mark of the beast could occur...
Story was picked up from the Washington Post, then rerouted through this part.
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 6:16 pm
by 4Joshua8
No thanks.
I wonder what it might entail?
Masks.
Rolling shutdowns.
Mandated vaccines.
A new mechanism for accountability.
Participation in the economy conditional upon participation in the new mechanism and any health agency guidance and mandates.
Did I miss anything?
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 6:44 pm
by Subcomandante
4Joshua8 wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2021, 6:16 pm
No thanks.
I wonder what it might entail?
Masks.
Rolling shutdowns.
Mandated vaccines.
A new mechanism for accountability.
Participation in the economy conditional upon participation in the new mechanism and any health agency guidance and mandates.
Did I miss anything?
Lots of things, that if passed, could result in a worldwide tyranny.
I mentioned this in a previous post where I disagreed that the current system is the mark of the beast, when I said that as this pandemic draws to a close, there's going to be clamoring from a worldwide perspective to have a streamlined approach towards the next pandemic, in which there would be no escape to a safer haven.
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 7:03 pm
by 4Joshua8
Subcomandante wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2021, 6:44 pm
4Joshua8 wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2021, 6:16 pm
No thanks.
I wonder what it might entail?
Masks.
Rolling shutdowns.
Mandated vaccines.
A new mechanism for accountability.
Participation in the economy conditional upon participation in the new mechanism and any health agency guidance and mandates.
Did I miss anything?
Lots of things, that if passed, could result in a worldwide tyranny.
I mentioned this in a previous post where I disagreed that the current system is the mark of the beast, when I said that as this pandemic draws to a close, there's going to be clamoring from a worldwide perspective to have a streamlined approach towards the next pandemic, in which there would be no escape to a safer haven.
Yeah, this pandemic has had a lot of things that look mark-of-the-beast-ish, but it seems like a type of what's to come...
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 7:15 pm
by Chip
4Joshua8 wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2021, 6:16 pm
No thanks.
I wonder what it might entail?
Masks.
Rolling shutdowns.
Mandated vaccines.
A new mechanism for accountability.
Participation in the economy conditional upon participation in the new mechanism and any health agency guidance and mandates.
Did I miss anything?
Mandated transgenderism quotas for 5 to 11-year-olds.
The day draws closer when that phantasmic nerd gets his due.
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 7:18 pm
by Subcomandante
Chip wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2021, 7:15 pm
4Joshua8 wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2021, 6:16 pm
No thanks.
I wonder what it might entail?
Masks.
Rolling shutdowns.
Mandated vaccines.
A new mechanism for accountability.
Participation in the economy conditional upon participation in the new mechanism and any health agency guidance and mandates.
Did I miss anything?
Mandated transgenderism quotas for 5 to 11-year-olds.
Don't get ridiculous now Chip.
The Islamic nations would never agree to such terminology.
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 7:39 pm
by InfoWarrior82
What are you talking about? Our prophet of God has already said these people are wise and thoughtful, and that complying with them is the
ONLY WAY out.
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 2nd, 2021, 8:00 pm
by mahalanobis
Corporations and large institutions will jump aboard. Many individuals will not like it, but the restrictions will be marketed as "optional" (at the beginning that is). That's right, optional. That is: if you don't do it it will just hurt your social credit score a little. No big deal, right?
Re: WHO wants international pandemic treaty that is legally binding
Posted: December 3rd, 2021, 2:08 am
by Niemand
mahalanobis wrote: ↑December 2nd, 2021, 8:00 pm
Corporations and large institutions will jump aboard. Many individuals will not like it, but the restrictions will be marketed as "optional" (at the beginning that is). That's right, optional. That is: if you don't do it it will just hurt your social credit score a little. No big deal, right?
Like online banking is optional, except they shut all the bank branches.