Page 1 of 1

American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 24th, 2021, 9:58 am
by Sirius
The brethren are still "urging" everyone to get the vaccine, while still stating it is "safe and effective". The journal Circulation is a well-respected publication. It’s 71-years-old, its articles are peer reviewed and in one survey it was rated the world’s no 1 journal in the cardiac and cardiovascular system category. This was their findings and conclusion in regards to this "godsend".

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161 ... pl_1.10712

Brethren, this message you are peddling is NOT inspiration from God, nor are you being honest about this. Your true designs are being exposed.

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 24th, 2021, 10:02 am
by Gadianton Slayer
:D

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=64067

Ignorance is not an option.

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 24th, 2021, 10:47 am
by Sirius
Gadianton Slayer wrote: November 24th, 2021, 10:02 am :D

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=64067

Ignorance is not an option.
My apologies :)

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 24th, 2021, 10:48 am
by Gadianton Slayer
Sirius wrote: November 24th, 2021, 10:47 am
Gadianton Slayer wrote: November 24th, 2021, 10:02 am :D

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=64067

Ignorance is not an option.
My apologies :)
No you’re good, I was just showing where we’ve had a discussion about it :)

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 24th, 2021, 11:17 am
by The Red Pill
Sirius wrote: November 24th, 2021, 9:58 am The brethren are still "urging" everyone to get the vaccine, while still stating it is "safe and effective". The journal Circulation is a well-respected publication. It’s 71-years-old, its articles are peer reviewed and in one survey it was rated the world’s no 1 journal in the cardiac and cardiovascular system category. This was their findings and conclusion in regards to this "godsend".

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161 ... pl_1.10712

Brethren, this message you are peddling is NOT inspiration from God, nor are you being honest about this. Your true designs are being exposed.
Q15 have boxed themselves into a dangerous predicament. EVERYDAY we see stories PROVING it is neither safe, nor effective. But rather, deadly and completely ineffective.

So....just like the Russia, Russia, Russia lie...it eventually became common knowledge...that it was a lie.

It will not be a good look for Q15 when it is common knowledge that the jab is deadly and ineffective...but even worse will be that Q15, through their reckless "urging" actually got people killed and injured...that would have not gotten it otherwise.

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 25th, 2021, 12:35 am
by Bronco73idi
Once you understand men were never strong enough to truly maintain the lord’s church then you are free from caring about the lies the weak men are saying.

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 25th, 2021, 12:53 am
by Chip
What will they do, back up or double-down some more?

Avraham Gileadi's explanation of Isaiah seems to say that what happens next to them is their choice:

1) Admit they're wrong = survivable outcome

2) Maintain their course = total wipeout

I'm thinking they'll pick option #2.

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 25th, 2021, 4:04 am
by BeNotDeceived
Chip wrote: November 25th, 2021, 12:53 am What will they do, back up or double-down some more?

Avraham Gileadi's explanation of Isaiah seems to say that what happens next to them is their choice:

1) Admit they're wrong = survivable outcome

2) Maintain their course = total wipeout

I'm thinking they'll pick option #2.
Biden’s really good at pulling a #2. :lol:

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 25th, 2021, 4:49 am
by Niemand
Can someone please save this page and/or a copy of this paper? Because I strongly suspect it will be pulled at some point.

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 25th, 2021, 5:05 am
by BeNotDeceived
Niemand wrote: November 25th, 2021, 4:49 am Can someone please save this page and/or a copy of this paper? Because I strongly suspect it will be pulled at some point.
It’s by Dr. G :lol:

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 25th, 2021, 5:05 am
by EvanLM
The parable of the watchman lived out right before our eyes and the result of their neglect dang Not sure I'm ready.

Re: American Heart Assoc. Peer Reviewed Journal: mRNA vaccines are dangerous

Posted: November 25th, 2021, 5:22 am
by Niemand
BeNotDeceived wrote: November 25th, 2021, 4:04 am
Chip wrote: November 25th, 2021, 12:53 am What will they do, back up or double-down some more?

Avraham Gileadi's explanation of Isaiah seems to say that what happens next to them is their choice:

1) Admit they're wrong = survivable outcome

2) Maintain their course = total wipeout

I'm thinking they'll pick option #2.
Biden’s really good at pulling a #2. :lol:
Our rulers seem obsessed with rolling this out to everybody in the world, along with the tracking ID based on some QR Code. It feels like they've either been told to do it, whatever the cost (which includes their jobs and national stability in many cases), or that their bureaucratic mindset means that they can't adjust to the idea of it failing.

Not sure which is worse.

I do think that there is a definite rush towards the year 2030, and desperately trying to get certain systems in place before then. There are various reasons for this, some pretty sinister and some so that the aging generations of Schwabs and Gates etc can see all this happen before they die themselves. (Although I suspect both men think they will cheat death by getting themselves uploaded somehow.)