Your home for discussing politics, the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and the principles of liberty.
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/
Don't forget the D3, zinc, and perhaps the ivermectin, if only for prophylactic purposes.
It also runs through Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Jason wrote: ↑November 21st, 2021, 8:17 pm . .. . . ..
I'm well aware of the data...the origin...the patents...the test protocol...etc etc etc. Go back to my Blipits posts covering it when it was only a China phenomenon in January of 2020...as well as the Dr. Frank Plummer thread tracking a particularly nasty coronavirus originating in Saudi Arabia that was patented and subsequently used for gain-of-function research...of which Dr. Frank Plummer had the HIV expertise...and would you know it...we have HIV component now in coronavirus (gp120 glycoprotein)...and patented by US Government who paid for the research...along with Bill Gates. That story also tracks from the level IV facility in Winnipeg to Wuhan, China.
Also aware of widespread outbreak with consistent symptoms like loss taste/smell, blood clots, etc...which is also most similar to vaccination with spike protein. So yeah I believe there is a real nasty and specialized bug under the Covid umbrella that is hurting people...that testing may or may not identify with all the errors in that department.
FYI - it's not a scam...it's a real live in your face government operation...speaking of guts to face the whole truth...
Agree with you both 100%. I have dropped breadcrumbs for NeveR numerous times; names, research of doctors...but they stay on the ground. She prefers to play her one note piano of "No such thing as a bio-weapon called covid". The research is extensive and conclusive...that what we call "covid" existed in a patent and conspiring mens minds long before 2020.larsenb wrote: ↑November 22nd, 2021, 2:57 pmIt also runs through Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Jason wrote: ↑November 21st, 2021, 8:17 pm . .. . . ..
I'm well aware of the data...the origin...the patents...the test protocol...etc etc etc. Go back to my Blipits posts covering it when it was only a China phenomenon in January of 2020...as well as the Dr. Frank Plummer thread tracking a particularly nasty coronavirus originating in Saudi Arabia that was patented and subsequently used for gain-of-function research...of which Dr. Frank Plummer had the HIV expertise...and would you know it...we have HIV component now in coronavirus (gp120 glycoprotein)...and patented by US Government who paid for the research...along with Bill Gates. That story also tracks from the level IV facility in Winnipeg to Wuhan, China.
Also aware of widespread outbreak with consistent symptoms like loss taste/smell, blood clots, etc...which is also most similar to vaccination with spike protein. So yeah I believe there is a real nasty and specialized bug under the Covid umbrella that is hurting people...that testing may or may not identify with all the errors in that department.
FYI - it's not a scam...it's a real live in your face government operation...speaking of guts to face the whole truth...
NR needs to read the patent research done by Dr. David Martin, before settling hard and fast on the 'no COVID virus' idea. She's right, that it isn't a naturally occurring virus. It was engineered ostensibly as SARS-CoV-1, and patterned off the Coronaviridae virus family. First developed to be used something like a vector delivery system in the treatment of canine and chicken viruses, as I recall.
.
If you've done your reading, that is exactly where we're at: HCQ- and Ivermectin-based treatments, which have been demonstrated around the world in diverse countries (e.g., India and Japan) to be effective treatments of COVID, have been declared as illegal and off-use by the Biden administration and our betters at the CDC and NIH (who are making billions of dollars off the production and implementation of various "vaccines"), so the state medical boards, in lockstep with their overseers, actively prevent the hospitals and doctors--by threat, perhaps?--to keep doctors from using anything that might effectively treat COVID. Furthermore, since more people are dying from post-jab side-effects, it should be clear that it isn't about treating the illness, it's about population reduction: some people react to "the jab" and die, and since our betters have declared the earth overpopulated and in need of saving from said overpopulation, the loss of a few people doesn't weigh heavily on their shoulders.Fred wrote: ↑November 19th, 2021, 1:27 pm I don't want to be insensitive at this time, but I wonder if she considered Ivermectin over the hospital? There is not a chance in hell that I would allow anyone that I cared about to go to the hospital to be killed, either by neglect or on purpose. Any doctor or institution that thinks the jab is better than Ivermectin is not fit to make medical decisions for anyone.
Eh from what I can tell, Ivermectin has had small studies that indicate that it is helpful, but this still seenas being inconclusive due to the fact that these studies are small in nature.AnotherLDSPatriot wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2021, 7:17 amIf you've done your reading, that is exactly where we're at: HCQ- and Ivermectin-based treatments, which have been demonstrated around the world in diverse countries (e.g., India and Japan) to be effective treatments of COVID, have been declared as illegal and off-use by the Biden administration and our betters at the CDC and NIH (who are making billions of dollars off the production and implementation of various "vaccines"), so the state medical boards, in lockstep with their overseers, actively prevent the hospitals and doctors--by threat, perhaps?--to keep doctors from using anything that might effectively treat COVID. Furthermore, since more people are dying from post-jab side-effects, it should be clear that it isn't about treating the illness, it's about population reduction: some people react to "the jab" and die, and since our betters have declared the earth overpopulated and in need of saving from said overpopulation, the loss of a few people doesn't weigh heavily on their shoulders.Fred wrote: ↑November 19th, 2021, 1:27 pm I don't want to be insensitive at this time, but I wonder if she considered Ivermectin over the hospital? There is not a chance in hell that I would allow anyone that I cared about to go to the hospital to be killed, either by neglect or on purpose. Any doctor or institution that thinks the jab is better than Ivermectin is not fit to make medical decisions for anyone.
Not in this life, anyway...
McCullough would disagree with you. He avers that there are about 60 studies indicating definite benefit, with 30 of these using randomized trials. He also emphasizes that it isn't the end-all-be-all, necessarily; and that doctors should use everything in the COVID treatment protocol arsenal which he tags as multidrug therapeutics.Durzan wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2021, 7:27 amEh from what I can tell, Ivermectin has had small studies that indicate that it is helpful, but this still seenas being inconclusive due to the fact that these studies are small in nature.AnotherLDSPatriot wrote: ↑November 23rd, 2021, 7:17 amIf you've done your reading, that is exactly where we're at: HCQ- and Ivermectin-based treatments, which have been demonstrated around the world in diverse countries (e.g., India and Japan) to be effective treatments of COVID, have been declared as illegal and off-use by the Biden administration and our betters at the CDC and NIH (who are making billions of dollars off the production and implementation of various "vaccines"), so the state medical boards, in lockstep with their overseers, actively prevent the hospitals and doctors--by threat, perhaps?--to keep doctors from using anything that might effectively treat COVID. Furthermore, since more people are dying from post-jab side-effects, it should be clear that it isn't about treating the illness, it's about population reduction: some people react to "the jab" and die, and since our betters have declared the earth overpopulated and in need of saving from said overpopulation, the loss of a few people doesn't weigh heavily on their shoulders.Fred wrote: ↑November 19th, 2021, 1:27 pm I don't want to be insensitive at this time, but I wonder if she considered Ivermectin over the hospital? There is not a chance in hell that I would allow anyone that I cared about to go to the hospital to be killed, either by neglect or on purpose. Any doctor or institution that thinks the jab is better than Ivermectin is not fit to make medical decisions for anyone.
Not in this life, anyway...
The “jab is better than Ivermectin” is the current medical consensus of any practicing physician of any specialty you ask based on extensive data as of now.Fred wrote: ↑November 19th, 2021, 1:27 pm I don't want to be insensitive at this time, but I wonder if she considered Ivermectin over the hospital? There is not a chance in hell that I would allow anyone that I cared about to go to the hospital to be killed, either by neglect or on purpose. Any doctor or institution that thinks the jab is better than Ivermectin is not fit to make medical decisions for anyone.
That non-thinking IDIOTIC consensus is why so many people are being injured and dying from the jab. They are simply parroting what the dishonest and deceptive CDC, NIH have told them...Ah-men wrote: ↑December 3rd, 2021, 7:01 amThe “jab is better than Ivermectin” is the current medical consensus of any practicing physician of any specialty you ask based on extensive data as of now.Fred wrote: ↑November 19th, 2021, 1:27 pm I don't want to be insensitive at this time, but I wonder if she considered Ivermectin over the hospital? There is not a chance in hell that I would allow anyone that I cared about to go to the hospital to be killed, either by neglect or on purpose. Any doctor or institution that thinks the jab is better than Ivermectin is not fit to make medical decisions for anyone.