Meta?

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
User avatar
Silver Pie
seeker after Christ
Posts: 8989
Location: In the state that doesn't exist

Re: Meta?

Post by Silver Pie »

Niemand wrote: December 6th, 2021, 6:48 am It's pretty grim, but he describes it rather than showing it. I think people need to know about it.
That's probably the only redeeming feature.
I guess I'm sensitive to violence, torture, and cruelty, especially of animals. Can't handle it.

If I knew every evil thing every person has done, does, and will do, I would probably go kill myself in an effort to stop the nightmares and the horror because I've picked up the darkness. I honestly don't know how Jesus could handle it. No wonder he bled from every pore and begged the Father to stop it if it were possible.

User avatar
Silver Pie
seeker after Christ
Posts: 8989
Location: In the state that doesn't exist

Re: Meta?

Post by Silver Pie »

That doesn't sound sketchy. No, not at all. How about not uploading such things in the first place? If no one uploaded anything that would embarrass them or humiliate them if it got out, imo, that would be the best way to go. But a company specifically asking for such things? It smacks of "Trust me, I'm from the gov't."
abijah` wrote: December 6th, 2021, 6:07 pm Meta Asks for Nudes
"Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s new parent company for platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, is urging users to submit their intimate photos and videos to a new platform created to prevent images from being used as revenge porn.

The tool, described by Meta in a Thursday blog post as a countermeasure for “adults over 18 years old who think an intimate image of them may be shared or has already been shared, without their consent,” asks users to submit photos or videos of themselves naked or having sex to a hash-tagging database through the StopNCII.org (Stop Non-Consensual Intimate Images) website.

According to Meta, special hashtags called “digital fingerprints” assigned to uploaded materials can then be used to instantly detect and curb attempts to upload copies online by any would-be perpetrators. The Silicon Valley giant, however, assured that the system had been developed “with privacy and security at every step,” with only the hashtags being shared with StopNCII.org and other tech platforms with the explicit images never leaving the user’s device."

User avatar
Silver Pie
seeker after Christ
Posts: 8989
Location: In the state that doesn't exist

Re: Meta?

Post by Silver Pie »

4Joshua8 wrote: December 6th, 2021, 6:28 pmIt's got me thinking: what does this all counterfeit? Does it counterfeit the access to knowledge and real meaningful connection we'll have in the millennium?
A counterfeit of true joy and fulfillment, perhaps? Definitely a distraction from the work of repenting, turning to Christ, and being able to stand without frying when he shows up. Also, it probably dulls any connection to the Spirit, so one does not/cannot heed the warnings that tell you that "Christ" in the sky is a demon (or possessed by one).

I think, though, that anything that makes us subhuman is a success for the dark side of this eternal war between light and darkness.

User avatar
Fred
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 7610
Location: Zion

Re: Meta?

Post by Fred »

JuneBug12000 wrote: October 29th, 2021, 2:02 pm This is one of the most important announcements regarding the last days, thus far , in my lifetime.

(Lots of valuable insight)

Understand. Satan is revealing his "kingdom" It is called the Metaverse.
That means we we, through the principle of opposition in all things, must now begin to build Zion, not just talk about it.
So the purpose of the jab is the beginning of transhumanism. Therefore, what RMN calls a godsend, is actually forced participation in satan's kingdom. This is far more sinister than mere murder. This is worse than the mark of the beast. This is becoming the beast.

What RMN is recommending, is not only a counterfeit eternal life, but joining satan in fighting against the Almighty God. This can not be forgiven.

User avatar
Wondering Wendy
captain of 100
Posts: 475
Location: The Secret Place

Re: Meta?

Post by Wondering Wendy »

Fred wrote: December 7th, 2021, 4:58 am
JuneBug12000 wrote: October 29th, 2021, 2:02 pm This is one of the most important announcements regarding the last days, thus far , in my lifetime.

(Lots of valuable insight)

Understand. Satan is revealing his "kingdom" It is called the Metaverse.
That means we we, through the principle of opposition in all things, must now begin to build Zion, not just talk about it.
So the purpose of the jab is the beginning of transhumanism. Therefore, what RMN calls a godsend, is actually forced participation in satan's kingdom. This is far more sinister than mere murder. This is worse than the mark of the beast. This is becoming the beast.

What RMN is recommending, is not only a counterfeit eternal life, but joining satan in fighting against the Almighty God. This can not be forgiven.
Yes, this is what I believe might be happening. The mark will create a sort of internet connection of the minds. A false Holy Spirit connecting people to the beast system through technology. Only they will lose their free will in the process. People will pray for death, but be unable to find it. :(

User avatar
Niemand
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13997

Re: Meta?

Post by Niemand »

Silver Pie wrote: December 6th, 2021, 8:22 pm
Niemand wrote: December 6th, 2021, 6:48 am It's pretty grim, but he describes it rather than showing it. I think people need to know about it.
That's probably the only redeeming feature.
I guess I'm sensitive to violence, torture, and cruelty, especially of animals. Can't handle it.

If I knew every evil thing every person has done, does, and will do, I would probably go kill myself in an effort to stop the nightmares and the horror because I've picked up the darkness. I honestly don't know how Jesus could handle it. No wonder he bled from every pore and begged the Father to stop it if it were possible.
Yes, it's nasty. He didn't go into great detail, thankfully, but I think he said enough to know that Facebook is more interested in clamping down on political situations rather than abuse.

I agree it's probably just as well we don't hear about everything that goes on, I think our hearts would break. But people do need to know some of what goes on out there. If we are aware of abusive situations, we can prevent it happening.

People who are like this are often a tragedy in themselves. There is a chain of abuse. Most of these people were horrifically abused themselves, so that's how it reproduces itself. Very few people instigate it afresh.

User avatar
Jason
Master of Puppets
Posts: 18296

Re: Meta?

Post by Jason »

Silver Pie wrote: December 6th, 2021, 8:25 pm That doesn't sound sketchy. No, not at all. How about not uploading such things in the first place? If no one uploaded anything that would embarrass them or humiliate them if it got out, imo, that would be the best way to go. But a company specifically asking for such things? It smacks of "Trust me, I'm from the gov't."
abijah` wrote: December 6th, 2021, 6:07 pm Meta Asks for Nudes
"Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s new parent company for platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, is urging users to submit their intimate photos and videos to a new platform created to prevent images from being used as revenge porn.

The tool, described by Meta in a Thursday blog post as a countermeasure for “adults over 18 years old who think an intimate image of them may be shared or has already been shared, without their consent,” asks users to submit photos or videos of themselves naked or having sex to a hash-tagging database through the StopNCII.org (Stop Non-Consensual Intimate Images) website.

According to Meta, special hashtags called “digital fingerprints” assigned to uploaded materials can then be used to instantly detect and curb attempts to upload copies online by any would-be perpetrators. The Silicon Valley giant, however, assured that the system had been developed “with privacy and security at every step,” with only the hashtags being shared with StopNCII.org and other tech platforms with the explicit images never leaving the user’s device."
...but what could go wrong????

...talk about self defeat....

User avatar
TheDuke
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5862
Location: Eastern Sodom Suburbs

Re: Meta?

Post by TheDuke »

while I'm not ready to make comparisons of Apple (or Jobs) and anything religious, I do see the problem in a much larger context. That is simply continuing to remove people of personal interactions. I don't do Facebook, but I know a lot of people that do, i.e. for sharing photos and one-liners stories of trips and they are people of all ages.

I have been worried for many years that the younger generation just doesn't see the need for personal interactions. From the first video games that became multi-player and interactive to more immersive and real, to more distributed and interactive without ever meeting anyone. And at work before I left people would rather sit at their desks and call into meetings in the room next door than meet interactively. Now I'm even enjoying Zoom church and interacting on LDS FF vs. meeting with my TBM friends on Sunday in HP meetings (as in the past).

It is insidious, the relentless push to remove our personalities and interpersonal relationships, which is at the core of why we come to this earth. I.e., dating, church, work, entertainment, medicine. And it isn't one platform, it is Zoom, Webex, Xbox, Facebook, Twitter, Internet forums, instant chats, smart phones, text messaging, email (where it all started for me 50 years ago in a lab after learning value of phone calls and TV in my parents days and radio in their parents days) Peloton, Amazon (replacing Walmart replacing real stores).

I think loosing touch and becoming afraid of interacting with the fearless ease of being behind the Internet (and even an Avatar) is scary. Obtaining truth, facts, knowledge, values, etc.. from anonymous sources with little capability to discern. To me that is the scary part, the technology not any one platform.

User avatar
Silver Pie
seeker after Christ
Posts: 8989
Location: In the state that doesn't exist

Re: Meta?

Post by Silver Pie »

Niemand wrote: December 7th, 2021, 5:38 amMost of these people were horrifically abused themselves, so that's how it reproduces itself. Very few people instigate it afresh.
I am sure of that.

User avatar
Silver Pie
seeker after Christ
Posts: 8989
Location: In the state that doesn't exist

Re: Meta?

Post by Silver Pie »

Jason wrote: December 7th, 2021, 10:39 am ...but what could go wrong????
😆 😆

User avatar
markharr
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6523

Re: Meta?

Post by markharr »

Microsoft just staked their claim in the Metaverse with a $68.7 billion deal to purchase Activision. The largest in gaming history.

It's not enough to surround us with screens that are constantly pushing globalist propaganda. Many have learned to tune it out and are waking up. They need us totally immersed in their fantasy world where they have 100% control of what is allowed in, and nothing can distract.

User avatar
Being There
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2868

Re: Meta?

Post by Being There »

totally perverted ! -- in public !
take a look at this !

it's in Spanish, but just take a look at 30 sec. on this video.

Post Reply