LDS Freedom Forum

I know many of you live in North America, and I live in the UK... but this is pretty disturbing. Australia is a place which is supposed to share a lot of common values with other English speaking countries. Australia has already used similar facilities for illegal migrants, but I don't like the way this is pointing.

Afghanistan is taking a lot of attention off Oz just now. As far as I can tell it is experiencing the biggest social unrest in its history... or at least since Vietnam War protests over forty years ago.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 58i50.html

"Construction is under way at Melbourne’s Centre for National Resilience – the unwieldy name given to the new quarantine facility in Mickleham – with the camp set to open by the end of the year.

"A community engagement session was held earlier this week on progress of the fast-tracked 1000-bed accommodation site for returning travellers, however residents were told that builders would not be delayed by any consultation process.

"Earthworks have begun at an empty paddock in Melbourne’s north, which sits next to the federal government’s pet quarantine facility and is about 300 metres from homes..."

Australia and New Zealand are often the elites testing ground. If they can get away with something there, they'll roll it out in other places.

Robin Hood wrote: ↑August 29th, 2021, 10:03 am Australia and New Zealand are often the elites testing ground. If they can get away with something there, they'll roll it out in other places.

I remember reading about some of this stuff in Barry Smith's books. Barry was a Kiwi, and no friend of our church (although the issue only rarely came up in his stuff), I think he was some kind of evangelical. But he always used to say NZ was a testing ground due to its isolation and low population (even more so than Oz). He mentioned that the cashless society was being pioneered there.

Jacinda Ardern doesn't even hide her support of globalism. She was trained up under the WEF's "Young Global Leaders" project.
https://www.weforum.org/globalization4/

Oz has the added advantage over NZ and the USA of having vast amounts of space. It would cover most of the Continental USA, but has a population smaller than California, mostly on the coasts.... I think only Alaska has that kind of isolation in the states. I suppose it's warmer than Siberia...

Niemand wrote: ↑August 29th, 2021, 9:44 am I know many of you live in North America, and I live in the UK... but this is pretty disturbing. Australia is a place which is supposed to share a lot of common values with other English speaking countries. Australia has already used similar facilities for illegal migrants, but I don't like the way this is pointing.

Afghanistan is taking a lot of attention off Oz just now. As far as I can tell it is experiencing the biggest social unrest in its history... or at least since Vietnam War protests over forty years ago.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 58i50.html

"Construction is under way at Melbourne’s Centre for National Resilience – the unwieldy name given to the new quarantine facility in Mickleham – with the camp set to open by the end of the year.

"A community engagement session was held earlier this week on progress of the fast-tracked 1000-bed accommodation site for returning travellers, however residents were told that builders would not be delayed by any consultation process.

"Earthworks have begun at an empty paddock in Melbourne’s north, which sits next to the federal government’s pet quarantine facility and is about 300 metres from homes..."

I’d say the chances of your speculation that the fiasco evolving in Afghanistan is a diversion from Australia is spot-on. Nobody in the USA is noticing the freedoms being taken away in Australia at the present time. The Globalists at present are setting up the “green zone” relocation camps here too. Chuck Baldwin informs us about a document from the U.S. Center of Disease and Prevention (CDC):

This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings. This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.

The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.

Consideration: Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months.
Explanation: The shielding approach proposes that green zones be maintained until one of the following circumstances arises: (i) sufficient hospitalization capacity is established; (ii) effective vaccine or therapeutic options become widely available; or (iii) the COVID-19 epidemic affecting the population subsides.

The shielding approach is an ambitious undertaking, which may prove effective in preventing COVID-19 infection among high-risk populations if well managed.