I think it important that everyone understand that it is clear that this election was fraudulent and it is not an emotional conclusion. I, as well as others, are perfectly content to accept a democrat as president if the election is fair. But it is undeniable that this election wasn't fair. It is important to be dispassionate when analyzing this. Once you remove the emotion, there is no way to explain the data anomalies without intentional fraud occurring.
Apologists like Stacy will say that there is "absolutely no evidence" of fraud. Aside from this being a lie (They would be better to say they don't see any compelling evidence), the data itself and the processes around adjudication cannot be explained away. The absence of a successful court case is not evidence that fraud did not occur. It is evidence that the powers that be do not wish to open the hornets nest.
