Page 1 of 1

Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 6:45 pm
by kirtland r.m.
We are surely getting robbed in America. Over, and over, and over. This election has just been a series of continuous muggings that have been going on for some time now. Here is just a part of the newer robberies taking place.

RADIO November 30, 2020
Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

The audience listening to a hearing before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee couldn't help but gasp when Ret. US Army Colonel Phil Waldron explained unusual vote "spikes" for Joe Biden in Pennsylvania. During the hearing, Waldron explains to Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani that from these batches of 'spiked' votes, nearly 600 thousand were counted for Biden. But for President Trump? Just over three thousand! Author and political science professor Paul Kengor explains to Glenn just how unlikely this phenomenon truly is…

Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania https://www.glennbeck.com/radio/audienc ... nnsylvania

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 7:13 pm
by Chip
There was a lot more of this kind of information coming out in Arizona today. If you go to www.thegatewaypundit.com, you can read all about it.

Dr Shiva ran the party membership numbers for AZ and concluded that one out of three votes for Trump were switched to Biden. It's pretty simple.

Apparently, many states have been using this Dominion voting system with its weighted-vote settings to steer elections since 2002. The multi-state coalition has a backdoor relationship with Twitter, where they can get Twitter to suppress information about the voting system.

A lot of people need to have their heads separated from their bodies.

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 7:23 pm
by Chip
Some lady who was a ballot-count observer for Maricopa County worked on the election from November 3rd to November 10th. She said on the 10th, there were still trucks arriving full of ballots to be counted. That's a week after the election.

Another guy pointed out that in the last 20 years, Arizona's population has increased by 40%. However, its voters have increased by 300%. He thinks that they have slowly been stuffing the voter rolls and consequently, ballots, all along.

When all this is understood, Trump will be president and there will be a new paper ballot election. Almost all of the old representatives will be gone, because they were falsely elected by these systems. Kevin Zadai Said this would happen, but now I am seeing how it will happen.

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 8:22 pm
by h_p
I listened to the entire hearing from Arizona. If anybody thinks there's no evidence, they need to pull their heads out of the dirt and look. One of the people who testified personally witnessed poll workers spoiling Trump ballots so they couldn't be counted. She also testified that signature validation effectively did not happen. They were systematically allowing ballots where the signatures were clearly not even close to accurate, just so they could plow through the absentee ballots more quickly. Another testified of doing an investigation into people who requested absentee ballots but didn't vote. They actually called the people up and interviewed them. He found enough evidence of fraud to overturn the election results on that alone. Another ran mathematical analysis that showed the Dominion voting machines were weighting votes for Biden at 130%, and Trump's at 70%. Lots of eyewitness evidence of no chain of custody of the ballots, and insecure machines. Someone with a background in military information warfare captured actual network traffic of the voting machines communicating with servers in foreign countries. There's hard proof that the Dominion voting machines are completely insecure, and were specifically designed to manipulate vote counts. Evidence of vote counts being modified at the server level--apparently, it's just a matter of editing an Excel-type spreadsheet (a CSV file, specifically), and re-uploading it to the server.

Make no mistake: this is a coup, and it's unfolding right before our eyes.

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 10:39 pm
by tribrac
People believe what is easiest to believe.

What you're saying is very hard to believe.

If there was overwhelming undeniable evidence the ramifications would be very hard. So it would therefore be easier to believe it was a mistake, overblown, or a conspiracy.

Even if Joe Biden called a news conference and announced he had used an elaborate network of lies and conspiracy to steal the election 47% of the country would feel he was justified, another 30% would want to try to forget and move forward.

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: December 1st, 2020, 10:00 am
by h_p
tribrac wrote: November 30th, 2020, 10:39 pm People believe what is easiest to believe.

What you're saying is very hard to believe.

If there was overwhelming undeniable evidence the ramifications would be very hard. So it would therefore be easier to believe it was a mistake, overblown, or a conspiracy.

Even if Joe Biden called a news conference and announced he had used an elaborate network of lies and conspiracy to steal the election 47% of the country would feel he was justified, another 30% would want to try to forget and move forward.
This has to be said, but when the Democrats were complaining about voting machine insecurities from past elections, the Republicans brushed it off as sour grapes because we got the results we wanted. Now the shoe is on the other foot. Except this time we've got lots of proof that a handful of people has decided who gets to rule over us. Maybe we should have taken things more seriously back then and done something about it, because there ain't much that can be done now.

I've listened to the entire Pennsylvania and Arizona hearings, and am listening to the Michigan one going on right now. Hour after hour of eyewitness testimony of how our electoral process is fundamentally screwed. There's a complete mainstream media blackout on the hearings, and the Trump campaign is basically relegated to asking for a hail-Mary from the state legislatures to overturn the votes and appoint the electors themselves. Yeah, I'm not holding my breath, either.

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: December 1st, 2020, 11:25 am
by Sunain
How dare they find proof contrary to my opinion!

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: December 1st, 2020, 8:52 pm
by Durzan
Eyewitness testimonies ain’t really all that valuable. Human memory is fragile and easily prone to misremembering.

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 10:59 am
by h_p
Durzan wrote: December 1st, 2020, 8:52 pm Eyewitness testimonies ain’t really all that valuable. Human memory is fragile and easily prone to misremembering.
Yeah, video or it didn't happen. I guess we can throw out 200 years of court convictions then.

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 11:49 am
by Durzan
h_p wrote: December 2nd, 2020, 10:59 am
Durzan wrote: December 1st, 2020, 8:52 pm Eyewitness testimonies ain’t really all that valuable. Human memory is fragile and easily prone to misremembering.
Yeah, video or it didn't happen. I guess we can throw out 200 years of court convictions then.
Your sarcasm was completely unneeded.

Eyewitnesses do provide faulty information sometimes.

https://www.ncsc.org/trends/monthly-tre ... inal-cases

Re: Audience GASPS when Colonel explains Biden vote ‘spikes’ in Pennsylvania

Posted: December 2nd, 2020, 12:14 pm
by h_p
I just don't think people should be brushing off all the eyewitness testimony so casually just because it's not fool-proof. No evidence is that way, even video recordings can be misleading, but people seem to rely on that to the exclusion of everything else these days.