Giant Explosion in Beirut Lebanon

[JK4Woods]

....But, what was the first fire...?
I mean a large column of smoke on the other side of the grain silos was evident for sometime before the massive explosion took place.. what was the first fire from? (Likely all the ground zero firemen working that first fire perished in the massive explosion. Still, there would have been radio reports to headquarters of the FD detailing what that original fire was about...).

[Pazooka]

....But, what was the first fire...?
I mean a large column of smoke on the other side of the grain silos was evident for sometime before the massive explosion took place.. what was the first fire from? (Likely all the ground zero firemen working that first fire perished in the massive explosion. Still, there would have been radio reports to headquarters of the FD detailing what that original fire was about...).

Editor Gordon Duff explains in the video link posted above that the initial fire was started by a “sea-based small missile”

[Jonesy]

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/08/0 ... r-missile/

Those pictures are clearly not infrared videos/photos. They’re inverted photos. Just try inverting the photos on a photo app and it looks like an ordinary photo. If it were infrared, you wouldn’t be able to do that.

Here’s the editor of Veterans Today on whether or not that video was faked: https://youtu.be/FPiFIT40feA.

We did postprocessing examination of the video and we found that there was no alteration of the video - that the pixel mapping on the video itself was perfect. Using this and series of additional videos that have come in from all over Lebanon...[anyways, they were able to isolate imaging to determine that it was a 30’ plus Israeli surface to surface missile]

I mean, come on...even Joel Skousen has come out and said it was a tactical nuke. Do you work for the gatekeepers or something?

That’s not what I was saying. Re-read my post.

[Pazooka]

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/08/0 ... r-missile/

Those pictures are clearly not infrared videos/photos. They’re inverted photos. Just try inverting the photos on a photo app and it looks like an ordinary photo. If it were infrared, you wouldn’t be able to do that.

Here’s the editor of Veterans Today on whether or not that video was faked: https://youtu.be/FPiFIT40feA.

We did postprocessing examination of the video and we found that there was no alteration of the video - that the pixel mapping on the video itself was perfect. Using this and series of additional videos that have come in from all over Lebanon...[anyways, they were able to isolate imaging to determine that it was a 30’ plus Israeli surface to surface missile]

I mean, come on...even Joel Skousen has come out and said it was a tactical nuke. Do you work for the gatekeepers or something?

That’s not what I was saying. Re-read my post.

I did a few times and still am not sure I understand what you’re saying. Could you please help me out?

[Jonesy]

Those pictures are clearly not infrared videos/photos. They’re inverted photos. Just try inverting the photos on a photo app and it looks like an ordinary photo. If it were infrared, you wouldn’t be able to do that.

Here’s the editor of Veterans Today on whether or not that video was faked: https://youtu.be/FPiFIT40feA.

We did postprocessing examination of the video and we found that there was no alteration of the video - that the pixel mapping on the video itself was perfect. Using this and series of additional videos that have come in from all over Lebanon...[anyways, they were able to isolate imaging to determine that it was a 30’ plus Israeli surface to surface missile]

I mean, come on...even Joel Skousen has come out and said it was a tactical nuke. Do you work for the gatekeepers or something?

That’s not what I was saying. Re-read my post.

I did a few times and still am not sure I understand what you’re saying. Could you please help me out?

The link to that news source shows several pictures from an alleged “infrared” video. The pictures shown are not infrared, they are merely inverted pictures or videos. In a nutshell, infrared can show variance in temperature to certain objects. An inverted photo is just inverting the colors from black to white, etc. I inverted that photo myself as you can tell where my inverted brushstrokes are, and it made the picture come out in its natural color. Infrared doesn’t work like that.

Additionally, if those pictures were actually from infrared, the missile would not look like that. It would definitely not have a feathered tail either. That whole article and this senior editor is not at all credible. Just because someone is in the military does not make them an expert. It puts in to question all of this guy’s claims and sources.

[Pazooka]

Here’s the editor of Veterans Today on whether or not that video was faked: https://youtu.be/FPiFIT40feA.

I mean, come on...even Joel Skousen has come out and said it was a tactical nuke. Do you work for the gatekeepers or something?

That’s not what I was saying. Re-read my post.

I did a few times and still am not sure I understand what you’re saying. Could you please help me out?

The link to that news source shows several pictures from an alleged “infrared” video. The pictures shown are not infrared, they are merely inverted pictures or videos. In a nutshell, infrared can show variance in temperature to certain objects. An inverted photo is just inverting the colors from black to white, etc. I inverted that photo myself as you can tell where my inverted brushstrokes are, and it made the picture come out in its natural color. Infrared doesn’t work like that.

Additionally, if those pictures were actually from infrared, the missile would not look like that. It would definitely not have a feathered tail either. That whole article and this senior editor is not at all credible. Just because someone is in the military does not make them an expert. It puts in to question all of this guy’s claims and sources.

Yes, that’s exactly what I thought you said. I obviously disagree - and it’s because the several varied sources that I trust, personally, are all in agreement.

[Jonesy]

That’s not what I was saying. Re-read my post.

I did a few times and still am not sure I understand what you’re saying. Could you please help me out?

The link to that news source shows several pictures from an alleged “infrared” video. The pictures shown are not infrared, they are merely inverted pictures or videos. In a nutshell, infrared can show variance in temperature to certain objects. An inverted photo is just inverting the colors from black to white, etc. I inverted that photo myself as you can tell where my inverted brushstrokes are, and it made the picture come out in its natural color. Infrared doesn’t work like that.

Additionally, if those pictures were actually from infrared, the missile would not look like that. It would definitely not have a feathered tail either. That whole article and this senior editor is not at all credible. Just because someone is in the military does not make them an expert. It puts in to question all of this guy’s claims and sources.

Yes, that’s exactly what I thought you said. I obviously disagree - and it’s because the several varied sources that I trust, personally, are all in agreement.

I just have to ask and then I’m done. Do you think those photos on that article were from infrared?

[Pazooka]

I did a few times and still am not sure I understand what you’re saying. Could you please help me out?

The link to that news source shows several pictures from an alleged “infrared” video. The pictures shown are not infrared, they are merely inverted pictures or videos. In a nutshell, infrared can show variance in temperature to certain objects. An inverted photo is just inverting the colors from black to white, etc. I inverted that photo myself as you can tell where my inverted brushstrokes are, and it made the picture come out in its natural color. Infrared doesn’t work like that.

Additionally, if those pictures were actually from infrared, the missile would not look like that. It would definitely not have a feathered tail either. That whole article and this senior editor is not at all credible. Just because someone is in the military does not make them an expert. It puts in to question all of this guy’s claims and sources.

Yes, that’s exactly what I thought you said. I obviously disagree - and it’s because the several varied sources that I trust, personally, are all in agreement.

I just have to ask and then I’m done. Do you think those photos on that article were from infrared?

I’m not sure if I do or not. I’m basing my opinion off of a collection of footage - most notably the video taken by a woman who was talking and even laughing with her family while filming the smoke from the first explosion but then saw the jet(s) overhead and started to panic and it culminated in the massive explosion that threw everything to the ground.