Page 2 of 4

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 4th, 2020, 7:48 am
by Sunain
Image

Somewhat related to this topic. The 5G UK infrastructure is under attack and employees are being threatened. All the media is calling the link between 5G and Covid-19 a conspiracy. UK PM Boris Johnson is allowing Huawei to supply equipment for the UK though.

The biggest threat that 5G posses, that can be confirmed, is that Huawei gear is a front for the CCP. There still isn't any long term studies that deal with human health in regards to the frequencies that 5G uses but they are in the microwave wavelengths and also the same frequencies as weaponized crowd control. 600 mhz and 2.5Ghz is commonly used for 5G at the moment and now 6GHZ is getting ready to be approved by the FCC for WiFi.

There is no disputing that we are being bombarded with wireless signals, from cellphone towers, to WiFi routers and from satellites.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 4th, 2020, 8:33 am
by Thinker
The other night, after praying for guidance, I woke up in the middle of the night and felt the Spirit about the threat to my kids in school if they implement 5G/more complex tech abilities. My 1st thought was “I’ll homeschool if needed, but I’d rather not.” I feel the Spirit as I think about it. But I admit that sometimes I’ve confused emotion (fear/desire) with interpretations of the Spirit.

So, I looked into it a bit - though only a start. I appreciate others’ insights. The following seems to be an objective analysis of various studies & possible health issues associated with 5G - mostly a possibility of neurological issues, cancer & at higher levels: burning.

”There is certainly evidence that ties RF-EMF exposure to a small increase in the risk of developing certain cancers and other adverse health outcomes.

But the jury is still out on how serious a threat RF-EMFs in general — and 5G bandwidths in particular — pose to our health.

For those of us who live in densely populated areas, there is no escape from the myriad radio waves zipping through the air all around us.

To reduce our exposure to RF-EMFs, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) suggest cutting down how much time we spend on our cell phones, as well as using speaker mode or a hands-free kit to create more distance between our devices and our heads.”

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articl ... ottom-line

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 6th, 2020, 10:08 am
by buffalo_girl
Brian ~ David Icke is live-streaming a presentation with - to me - a convincing argument linking 5-G with the lung damage associated with COVID-19.

Exosome illness is a factor, along with the vaccination agenda.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3XlrQMOvW0

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 9th, 2020, 2:12 pm
by dconrad000
Just the fact that the modern-day-secret-combination is hell-bent on rolling out 5G should give one pause:


dconrad000 wrote: April 9th, 2020, 2:08 pm London Real Founder Responds To Banning of David Icke 5G Interview


https://banned.video/watch?id=5e8e6523e89f06006939a7c7


Image





_________________________________________________________________________
Important health and safety information for your loved ones, here:

http://www.drdaveconrad.com/bio.html

dconrad000 wrote: April 9th, 2020, 2:08 pm WATCH BANNED DAVID ICKE 5G INTERVIEW IN FULL
Share this censored discussion while you still can!
Infowars.com - APRIL 8, 2020
YouTube recently removed a London Real interview featuring David Icke where he claimed 5G is part of a larger plot to control humanity.
Icke points to the instances of Europeans destroying several 5G towers as evidence that many people don’t support the installation of the new technology.
In the name of free speech, Infowars is hosting this censored interview at Banned.video – Watch Below



https://www.infowars.com/watch-banned-d ... w-in-full/


Image





_________________________________________________________________________
Important health and safety information for your loved ones, here:

http://www.drdaveconrad.com/bio.html




_________________________________________________________________________
Important health and safety information for your loved ones, here:

http://www.drdaveconrad.com/bio.html

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 9th, 2020, 2:21 pm
by 4Joshua8
The Creator wrote: April 1st, 2020, 12:36 pm Every time a new wireless technology is released there are a lot of people claiming it's dangerous.
What I can say for 100% certain is that whenever I use my iPad and hold it over my belly, even when I'm not resting it on my belly or chest, I can feel a reaction in my body from having the iPad near it. It is not a pleasant reaction. It feels as though I'm being cooked or something like that. It doesn't feel like a "warmth" feeling, like as though the iPad was getting warm and warming my skin. No idea what it is or why. I don't use the iPad like that as much anymore.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 9th, 2020, 4:59 pm
by buffalo_girl
Brian ~ The entire David Icke interview on London Real, April 6 can be heard at London Real Podcasts: https://tunein.com/podcasts/Podcasts/Lo ... =141150033

I'm not sure how much of the interview can be found on David Icke's web page. I haven't tried it yet. https://www.davidicke.com/

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 10th, 2020, 5:36 am
by dconrad000
dconrad000 wrote: April 10th, 2020, 5:34 am For any that may have missed it, this 7-minute video clip is an absolute must-see video clip!!!


ALEX JONES OF INFOWARS TOLD ME “BRIAN YOU HAVE COURAGE, AND COURAGE IS INFECTIOUS” – WE ARE ALL ONE
Brian of London Real breaks down the massive censorship of YouTube for daring to question the health effects of 5G radiation
Infowars.com - APRIL 9, 2020
If 5G radiation is so safe, then why are the Internet censors silencing anyone questioning the health effects of 5G? If 5G critics are wrong, then why not have a debate over it instead of suppresion?
Also watch below Brian Rose’s explosive interview with David Icke which was suppressed after Icke brought up his concerns over 5G:



https://www.infowars.com/alex-jones-of- ... e-all-one/







Image





_________________________________________________________________________
Important health and safety information for your loved ones, here:

http://www.drdaveconrad.com/bio.html




_________________________________________________________________________
Important health and safety information for your loved ones, here:

http://www.drdaveconrad.com/bio.html

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 10th, 2020, 9:02 pm
by utez
I don't know enough about the EMF side of things to comment on the hype about 5G microwaving everyone to death...but the fact that it is being rushed out without any testing is alarming at the very least.

What I do know is that this push for 5G is all about total control. It is true that 4G is in a lot of places today, but there are still plenty of rural areas with no wireless connection. In order to achieve total control, every square inch of the globe needs to be covered which is why so many companies have started launching nano satellites into low earth orbit. Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Larry Page, Jeff Bezos, and others all have grand plans to blanket the earth in satellites so they can provide high speed internet and real time video footage of the entire earth.

Everything will be connected to the internet...and I mean everything. Sensors will be everywhere (including inside your body) tracking and monitoring every aspect of your life. This 2016 video from the former FCC chair is what initially got me worried about 5G:

https://youtu.be/nIDW6n539GU

The technology is nearing the point where Satan can create the world he always wanted. Just look at China's social credit system for a blueprint of what is coming. Many people will actually choose this type of system because it offers 100% security. That is why our political system has been rapidly declining every year and more and more people on both sides of the spectrum are fed up with our current 2 party system.

I've done a lot of research and thinking over the past few years about 5G and nanotechnology/smart dust and I really don't see any possible way to physically fight what is coming. When I first realize this I got really down and depressed. Then I realized this is a spiritual battle and that the only way to possibly combat any of this is through the priesthood.

So if anything, even if none of this will ever come to pass, at least I have tried to spin it in a good direction and have tried to get myself in a place spiritually where I can call down the powers of heaven if needs be.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 13th, 2020, 1:11 pm
by buffalo_girl
Here is a compelling presentation of recent events connecting 5-G activation, CEO 'made offs', tabletop pandemic exercises, genetically modified pathogens, universal digital ID, global fear mongering, and mandated vaccination:

Middle name is Dangerous?

Posted: April 13th, 2020, 2:46 pm
by BeNotDeceived
The Creator wrote: April 1st, 2020, 1:07 pm
markharr wrote: April 1st, 2020, 12:47 pm It's microwave radiation so i'm sure it isn't good for you but I doubt that it's any more dangerous than any of the other technologies that you pointed out.
Right, but the danger is based on the strength of the signal not just the fact that it's a micro-wave.

What I'm looking for is evidence that 5G signal strength will or won't be at dangerous levels.
Similar to LASERs, where an aiming beam is required by the FDA to be <= 5 mW, but the main LASER is often 1 watt or more. That or it's Marvin the Martian, is gonna blow up de Earth if he finds his P-238 Modulator. :lol:

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 13th, 2020, 8:15 pm
by Thinker
utez wrote: April 10th, 2020, 9:02 pm... This 2016 video from the former FCC chair is what initially got me worried about 5G:

https://youtu.be/nIDW6n539GU

...I've done a lot of research and thinking over the past few years about 5G and nanotechnology/smart dust and I really don't see any possible way to physically fight what is coming. When I first realize this I got really down and depressed. Then I realized this is a spiritual battle and that the only way to possibly combat any of this is through the priesthood.

So if anything, even if none of this will ever come to pass, at least I have tried to spin it in a good direction and have tried to get myself in a place spiritually where I can call down the powers of heaven if needs be.
I like that approach. What if millions had that approach - could be quite a force for good!

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: April 13th, 2020, 11:25 pm
by dewajack

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: August 3rd, 2020, 10:13 pm
by SPIRIT
https://www.radiationhealthrisks.com/wh ... dangerous/

Why 5 GHz WiFi Routers Are More Dangerous – Get The Facts!
Written by David in WIFI Routers

5G Wifi RouterAs technology rolls forth our society is gleaming with excitement each time every new gadget comes out faster and more vibrant than the model before. But is everything about faster and more powerful technology a good thing? Most people have no idea how dangerous things like having a WiFi router in your home can be.

5 GHz WiFi routers are more dangerous than the 2.4 GHz units because they are twice the frequency with more intensity than the standard 2.4 GHz models. Also, because the 5 GHz frequency dissipates faster with distance, 5 GHz routers also emit the 2.4 GHz frequency. This is so as you get farther away from the router and the 5 GHz signal weakens, you can still get WiFi (at slower speeds) via the 2.4 GHz signal the router also emits.
So the second reason why a 5 GHz router is more dangerous is because you are being exposed to two frequencies of Radio Frequency (RF) Radiation rather than just one.


Kevin Mottus of the US Brain Tumor Association says that within the RF Radiation part of the electromagnetic spectrum, the higher the frequency, the more dangerous it is to living organisms. The World Health Organization has classified RF Radiation in general as a possible “carcinogen“, meaning “cancer causing”. It can split DNA strands within cells. And cancer rates are around 3 times higher in people with high exposure to this RF Radiation. As the new fifth generation (5G) rolls out, it will only get worse. These devices will operate at between 24 GHz to 90 GHz frequency.
Latest Videos
WiFi Router Cover Review

In the paragraphs above I assume that you already know enough about WiFi Radiation to know the health problems it can cause. However for those who do not in the rest of this article I am first going to talk briefly about why WiFi Radiation (RF Radiation) is dangerous, and then talk about the best ways to still use technology but protect yourself and your family from this radiation.
WiFi Radiation Dangers

Frontal Lobe Brain TumorWhen you search on the internet for information about WiFi Radiation, whether it is safe or not, the answers that you get really depend on the source of the article you are reading. If it is a main stream media website, or one from a government agency or a technology company, they generally tell you that since WiFi Radiation is a “non-ionizing” form of electromagnetic radiation, “there is no way that it could be harmful to us”. I wish that were true.

However there are literally multiple hundreds of peer review scientific studies performed by doctors and scientists from all over the world who link this form of non-ionizing radiation to things like crib death, cancer, DNA damage (especially in infants and fetuses), and infertility. I have links to where you can find many of these scientific studies on the scientific studies page of this website.

I also have a couple of really good videos on that page by a British physicist named Barrie Trower who has studied this form of radiation for his entire career. He started out in the military being trained on how this form of radiation is used as military weapons both to damage the enemy as well as to disperse crowds.
More Dangerous Than A Cell Phone?

Yes the radiation coming from your WiFi router can be more dangerous than the radiation coming from your cell phone, depending on how close you are to it. Why? the reason is that it is constant. The radiation from a cell phone is intermittent meaning that it is only putting out the radiation when it is doing something where it needs to, like sending or receiving a phone call, checking GPS or checking for a WiFi signal.

A WiFi router on the other hand is always sending out the radiation 24 hours a day 7 days a week full blast. (A cordless phone sends out radiation 24/7 also just like a WiFi router by the way) It is not intermittent. And it is sending it all throughout the home. A cell phone causes people to get brain tumors when they are on it a lot. There have been scientific studies showing that. (See The 7 Worst Radiations In The Home).

Related article: “Cellphone Radiation Protection Items“.
Best Way To Beat The Radiation And Still Have Internet

By far the very best way to beat the radiation problem and still have internet is to hard wire your home and office with internet so you can plug your computers into the wall to get your internet. There is much less danger that way. People building a new home can do this for very little extra cost, and it is very convenient.

If you have an existing home it can still be more affordable than you think because most homes don’t need internet in every single room. I have seen people who have done all of this wiring on the outside of their houses. They just run the internet cables right along the edges of their siding to the outside of each room that needed the internet, and then into that room through a tiny hole in the wall. It was hardly noticeable on the outside of the house. In fact it was such a nice job most people would not even notice it at all unless you pointed it out to them. It definitely did not detract from the beauty of the home.

I have seen other homes where they did the wiring inside that looked really nice as well. In the one I am thinking of there were a few rooms where it was not that difficult to run the wiring actually in the wall without doing a lot of damage. But to a few of the rooms they had to run it along the floor under the trim and through tiny holes in the walls in a few places. It can be done so that it looks very professional in most situations.

The most expensive way is tearing out drywall and running it in the walls throughout the rooms in the house where you need it. This way insures the most professional and aesthetically pleasing finish, but is the most expensive.
If You Have To Have WiFi

In some situations you just have to have WiFi and it is not practical to hard wire everything. For example in my home my son is a college student and he really wants to have WiFi to do his homework on his laptop. I suppose I could be more stubborn about it but I found an alternative that I think is almost as good as hard-wiring the internet everywhere. It is called the WiFi Router Guard.

In the video below I test my own 5 GHz WiFi router. I set it up on a counter in my home. I have a meter which tests for this radiation. It measures up to 2,000 micro-watts per meter squared. The US safety limit is 1,000 micro-watts per meter squared, so my meter will read up to twice the US safety limit. I also test a really effective home protection device called a Wifi Router Guard in the below video. Its a short video but very much worth watching!

When I did this test I placed my meter about 4 feet away, just so I wasn’t right next to the router. The radiation coming out of my Netgear 5 GHz WiFi router pegged the meter, meaning there was more radiation coming out of the WiFi router than my meter would measure. So in other words it was at least twice the US safety limit. I video taped this test and so here is the video showing me doing this test. The video is short, but telling. Seeing is believing. I highly recommend you take a minute and watch the test I do in the above video.

If you wish to purchase other WiFi Router protection items go to the “Recommended Protections” page on this website, I have a link to the very best place to get items. They are not very expensive at all and very much worth it. I highly recommend protecting yourself and family.
Will My WiFi Still Work Using A WiFi Router Guard?

WiFi Router Guard with screenYes it will. Since I study this a lot I am a bit more paranoid than most. Not only do I have my 5 GHz Netgear router in a WiFi Router Guard, I have it wrapped in aluminum window screen as well. (See picture to the left) I picked the screen up at the hardware store. As you can see in the picture I put my router in the router guard, and then wrapped the router guard with the aluminum screen.

I only did this because my desk is in the same room as the WiFi router and I don’t want to be radiated all day. If I worked in a different room I would not bother doing this.

It is amazing with the WiFi Router Guard and the aluminum screen from 3 feet away my meter only reads at between 60 to 100 micro watts per meter squared. This is something like a 97% to 98% reduction in the radiation. As you can see I have it sitting on the floor and I have a metal file cabinet between myself and the router guard.

If you look close you can see the file cabinet to the left of the router guard in the picture. My desk is on the other side of the file cabinet. From where I sit in my desk my meter reads less than 10 micro watts per meter squared! Perfect is about 3 micro watts per meter squared (3 to 6 should be everyone’s goal to get their house down to) so my office is almost perfect.
So How Does The WiFi Work With This Setup?

With both the WiFi Router Guard and the aluminum screen, my son does all his homework on his laptop as well as watching videos on YouTube and Netflix. About twice a week his reception will slow down enough where he will come into my office and just pull the aluminum screen off from covering the WiFi Router Guard. With that one adjustment he his internet is back up to speed and he can finish his video or whatever. He never even asks me to open the WiFi Router Guard. He doesn’t need to. He gets enough WiFi to function just fine.

There is one other exception to this. Some times when I am using my laptop clear at the opposite end of the house (the farthest point away from the router) my internet will slow down (usually I am watching news with my wife in the evening on my laptop because my son and his friends are using all of the televisions) and so I will actually remove the aluminum screen and open the WiFi Router Guard because the reception will be a bit weak. We plan on building a new home in a little over a year, so I haven’t wanted to spend the money to hard wire internet to that part of the house. If I was going to stay here I would.

But my point is this. The WiFi Router Guard gives you the ability to have WiFi and still stay with in much safer radiation ranges, and it gives you the ability to control when you are exposed to more radiation, and when you are not. I think it is wonderful. In our new home we plan on hard wiring the whole house. We won’t have any kinds at home any longer so I will just keep the WiFi turned off on the router unless I have my kids over visiting and they request it for their laptops.
The Aesthetics of the Aluminum Screen

Now I must say having the Aluminum Screen is not aesthetically pleasing. My wife thinks it looks tacky, and it does. Again I would not do it if it were not that I sit so close to the router. The WiFi Router Guard looks very professional and fits into the office very well. The aluminum screen only cut out an additional 3% to 6 % of the radiation down. So I really would be fine with just the router guard.

The reason I bring this up is because I know some people have told me that with it only trimming off 3% to 6% its not worth the Aesthetics loss. If my desk was in a different room and so farther away from the router, or if I had people visiting my office a lot, I may opt to not go with the Aluminum screen, because the WiFi Router Guard cuts down at least 90% to 95% (closer to 95%) of the radiation anyway.
5G Technology Is More Dangerous

See the below video to learn more about how and why the new 5G technology coming out is going to be so much more dangerous. One thing that makes 5G more dangerous is because of the shorter length of millimeter waves (MMV). They are dramatically shorter in length than 2G, 3G or 4G wave length. And they are much more dense. How this affects people exposed to this radiation coming from something in the home such as a 5G WiFi router, is it is a much more intense radiation. This means that the carcinogenic effects of 2G, 3G and 4G radiation will be magnified under 5G and deterioration and degradation into disease will happen faster.

In the 5G radiation that is blasted out from cell towers, this shorter wave length means that the radiation will not travel as far as the longer waves of the 3G and 4G radiation. This means that for everyone to have good signals everywhere they have good signals now, we will need many more smaller 5G cell towers. Experts say that they need to install a mini 5G cell tower every 2 to 8 houses.

What this means is that we will still have the large towers, plus we will have hundreds of smaller mini 5G towers all around us and we will be surrounded by and drenched in this 5G radiation once it is fully implemented. Plus most people will have 5G cell phones, blue tooth devices in their cars and earbuds, and in their home WiFi and other home electronics. Our cells will literally be bombarded with this radiation from multiple sources no matter where we are 24 hours a day 7 days a week.

Hopefully we will be able to alert enough people to the dangers of this much ultra high frequency and ultra intense radiation waves before it gets to that point. I am not trying to sound like an alarmist, but the peer reviewed studies proving the dangers of electromagnetic radiation are out there by the thousands and we have had this information as a society for over 50 years.
Final Thoughts

If you have read all through this article to this point, thank you! Very few people are interested in these topics, let alone take the time to actually read an entire article. However these dangers are real. That is why I highly recommend that you do two things for me if you are willing. 1. share this article on your social media! Help us spread the word and get the message out. And 2. take some time to go to the scientific studies page of this website and watch those two videos, and look up some of the studies. This will give you much more knowledge and confidence in the reality of these dangers. Again thank you for reading this article!

Please also see our articles entitled “What Is A Safe Distance From A Wifi Router?” and “Wifi Router Guard Product Review“.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: August 3rd, 2020, 11:02 pm
by gigarath24
Three words: internet of things. If you like corporations data mining the crap out of your phone, and the government gathering metadata from your "smart" tv you're going to love iot. Internet connected shirts, pants, shoes, light bulbs, and anything with an electrical current gathering data on you. The manufacturer going out of business, or all of a sudden charging a subscription fee that you don't want to pay. Then now you've got an expensive paperweight. 5g will get at least 100 mbps down upto 10 gbps down with expanded bandwidth. So if you like privacy 5g is detrimental to all you hold dear. If you like dedicated 4g chips in everything just wait until 5g enabled RFID adaptive chipsets make their way into your government issued ids, license plates, and led light bulbs.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: August 4th, 2020, 1:14 pm
by creator
SPIRIT wrote: August 3rd, 2020, 10:13 pmWhy 5 GHz WiFi Routers Are More Dangerous – Get The Facts!
Regarding WiFi routers and similar sources of RF (radio frequency), I would recommend having your router at least a 6 to 10 foot distance from your computer, or from anywhere a person is sitting for long periods of time. The signal gets significantly weaker the farther you are away from the source of the RF.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: October 22nd, 2020, 10:27 am
by Thinker
As mentioned, 5-G emits not much more radiation than other things many of us are exposed to, though evidence does suggest some degree of harm.

“For 5G there’s a new dimension ... when you’re using [5G], you will attract a beam towards you, a good communication channel in other words, and you will have higher exposure,” Joseph explains. “The non-user ... somebody else in the room, far enough, he or she will have on average lower exposure, because it’s really communication towards you, towards the user...

So how much exposure do users and non-users get?
“Around five, six volts per meter ... while you’re using it, for instance, continuously 100% streaming towards you,” Joseph says. “So that’s not possible in practice, but that’s kind of maximum. When you’re a non-user it goes to zero to three volts per meter.”
If you’re like me, those numbers mean close to nothing. So I looked for ways to compare them, and found nine researched and medically screened comparables on Healthline.

1. 1,666 times more: Power mains close to power lines (10,000 V/m)
2. 33 times more: Natural electromagnetic fields like those created by the sun (200 V/m)
3. 50 times more: Electric trains and trams (300 V/m)
4. 16.7 times more: Power mains not close to power lines (100 V/m)
5. 2.3 times more: Microwave ovens (14 V/m)
6. 1.7 times more: TV and computer screens (10 V/m)
7. 1.5 times more: Radars (9 V/m)
8. Same: TV and radio transmitters (6 V/m)
9. Same: Mobile phone base stations (6 V/m)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoetsi ... 8a337d1696

“A review of more than two dozen studies on low-frequency EMFs suggests these energy fields may cause various neurological and psychiatric problems in people. This study found a link between EMF exposure and changes in human nerve function throughout the body, affecting things like sleep and mood.”
https://www.healthline.com/health/emf#research


Speaking of nerve issues...
STUDY: methylisothiazolinone (MIT) (in some shampoos & cosmetics) was shown to restrict the growth of immature rat nerve cells.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: October 22nd, 2020, 11:04 am
by buffalo_girl
Twenty years ago, I was able to access 'scholarly papers', patents, & military 'white papers' with ease. The internet was fairly open to all sorts of documents which substantiated the use of electromagnetic frequencies as a weapon. We willingly pay for our torture. https://www.globalresearch.ca/electroma ... -2/5458103

A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research states

“Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to electric stimulation unrelated to heat”.

In a many times replicated experiment, microwaves pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the nerve cells (1,2). Calcium plays a key role in the firing of neurons and Ross Adey, member of the first scientific team which published this experiment, publicly expressed his conviction that this effect of electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration on complex tasks (7).
Apparently, the Russians are using the technology to derail suspected spies. https://www.gq.com/story/cia-investigat ... ve-attacks

Based on my observations - cell phones are addictive. With enhanced microwave capability, a person will be able to download a feature film in less than 30 seconds so that his/her imprisoned life will be more tolerable?

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: November 7th, 2020, 11:09 pm
by Thinker
Remember the strange media from China showing people suddenly collapsing in the street? What was the cause? Could 5-G towers (which were already up & running then) have something to do with it?

Wuhan was the province where 5G was rolled out
https://5g-emf.com/wuhan-was-the-provin ... dly-virus/

And the boys who suddenly collapsed & died in China wearing masks for PE?
https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus ... story.html

“Firefighters in California counties from San Francisco to Sacramento to Los Angeles, have reported severe neurological damage, headaches, insomnia, memory problems and confusion after 5G towers were installed outside their stations. When tested, they were found to have brain abnormalities and measurable neurological deficits...”

“Short-term exposure to millimeter waves can cause physiological effects in the nervous system, immune system and cardiovascular system, while long-term exposure could lead to conditions like melanoma and sterility, according to Moskowitz...”
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2 ... and-coron/

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: November 24th, 2020, 11:13 am
by Thinker
”During the Iraq War, electromagnetic weapons, including high power microwaves, were used by the U.S. military to disrupt and destroy Iraqi electronic systems and may have been used for crowd control. Types and magnitudes of exposure to electromagnetic fields are unknown.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon

“The low-orbit satellites being launched to provide 5G and Wi-Fi services everywhere on Earth contaminate our night skies, flood Earth with powerful, focused electromagnetic beams that emit radiofrequency (RF) and microwave yet no national or international agency has taken action to evaluate, reduce, prevent or publicize the environmental impact of the satellites' emissions.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news ... nightmare/

This comment was interesting:
”WHO even had to succumb to the evidence and allow for the potential of cancer related to emissions from radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, in particular mobile phones. Their classification is that there's the possibility of brain cancer from such exposure under certain conditions. However, it's interesting to note that a large factor in their decision was from results of the Interphone Study (funded largely by the Tel Com industry) which cited an example of "heavy" mobile phone users after 10 years have an increased risk of a certain type of brain tumor. Their definition of heavy in this case was TWO HOURS per Month! The fact that they could say that with a straight face is enough to make you have to take pause... My point is, it goes without saying that more research is needed but that most reasonable people would agree there's far more here then to simply profess: "no chance", "it's physically impossible", "people are stupid for ever thinking any other way" etc....

Despite my criticism of the aforementioned regulatory bodies, and though they seem to dismiss concerns, they know very well there's potential for serious harm, and is why they set safety guidelines, and different ones for the general public and those employed in the industries that are exposed. It would appear they to recognize that despite the fact that they're dealing with NONIONIZING radiation, that certain levels of exposure to the harmless "they pass right through you" waves, still can cause actual and serious harm to the human body.

Again, things don't need to strip your DNA apart to be harmful. UV light is nonioning, but it still causes cancer. There are biological processes that occur as a result. Harm is not limited to focused lasers burning your skin or heating your tissue to a burn underneath the skin, or microwaves cooking you. There's a recent study that showed WiFi radio could kill and/or deform human sperm. This was on ejaculated samples, and not while still in the body, but it shows the legitimate need for further research and the potential risk associated. (This was WiFi radio transmitted from computer laptops) The point is it's far from a simple case of this is safe or it isn't, as so many have suggested in their comments, and in fact there's legitimate evidence and cause for concern without you having to be an idiot, conspiracy theorist, or hypochondriac. There's a legitimate question as to exposure under certain circumstances, as well potential accumulation of low frequency radiation over periods of time. I don't think we necessarily have to discontinue use of things that carry potential, even high potential risk, but I think we need to be informed so we can make informed and personal decisions about our exposure...”

https://www.zdnet.com/article/is-rf-exp ... ur-health/

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: November 27th, 2020, 8:06 am
by Thinker
“California officially issued guidelines advising of mobile phone dangers, warning of increased risk of brain cancer and other health problems, and that children’s developing brains could be at greater risk: https://www.ewg.org/news-and-analysis/2 ... jW0nlWnFhE

In 2013 Dr. Anthony Miller from University of Toronto School of Public Health recommended that based on new research, radio frequency (RF) exposure should be reclassified as a probable carcinogen...

Our existing RF meters can measure 5G frequency bands below 8 GHz, but not the high-band 5G at 24 GHz and higher frequencies which will be deployed mostly after 2022 except in the center of some large cities. Those high-band 5G frequencies (24 GHz and higher) will not be used as the main 5G mobile phone network, but will provide local ‘hot-spots’ in the home and open areas where there are many active users. Many more base-stations/masts located close together will be required in coming years for widespread use of 5G.

http://www.magneticsciences.com/RF-health/

”The National Toxicology Program (NTP) study on cell phone radiation showed significant increases in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF even below the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation (ICNIRP) guidelines [13]. Furthermore, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) concluded that EMF frequencies of 30 KHz-300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans, which is the frequency emitted by cordless and wireless phones [14,15].

Another study published by the Department of Electrical Engineering, Georgia Southern University (2017) concluded:
“Results show that 5G downlink RF fields generate significantly higher power density (PD) and specific absorption rate (SAR) than a current cellular system.”…Thus, when a larger phased antenna is used or when a user moves closer to the AP, the PD value becomes a major health concern which inevitably requires more research about health effects of 5G before it is deployed successfully by strictly following the RF emission standards...

(Tips:)
*While in the car or train, your phone will put out higher RF energy to prevent dropped calls or maintain connection while changing signals to different cell-phone towers, so it’s recommended to avoid using your cell phone while in transit. This is also true if your signal is less than two bars, in which case, your cell phone also puts out more RF to connect to the nearest tower.

*When streaming or downloading large files, it’s recommended to download them first while you’re away from your phone and then switch your phone to airplane mode while you watch or listen...

https://newbridgewellness.com/blog/emf-rf-exposure/

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: November 27th, 2020, 8:39 am
by buffalo_girl
There are even mobile units to be deployed in remote environs when ordinary folk get 'uppity'.

LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device)

I suspect it can be cranked up to ultra-sonic.

Image

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: November 27th, 2020, 10:22 am
by Zathura
Any suggestion that 5g caused COVID, caused people to drop in the streets, causes cancer, or that it alters our dna in any way is simply wrong.

There have been legitimate years long peer reviewed studies that don’t give us EVERYTHING we need to know, but give us enough to know this ridiculous claims are false.

As of now, we cannot conclusively say 5g will not have some eventual affect in our bodies, but we can toss out ridiculous theories that have no base in fact.

It’s all about heat. These waves cannot penetrate deep enough to where they’d do the damage necessary for these theories to be right, and these waves do not cause near enough heat to cause damage. If they did, they will have been banned by regulatory orgs.

These wave frequencies are sent out in all directions. Even if you redirected it to one single point instead of a large sphere, and directed it straight at your head, you likely wouldn’t have any side affect.

I’ve posted the studies and the sources before, there’s no point in providing them, nobody cares.Those who are looking for info simply need to research it for themselves, the others have made up their mind and won’t let anything dissuade them.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: November 27th, 2020, 12:16 pm
by buffalo_girl
Any suggestion that 5g caused COVID, caused people to drop in the streets, causes cancer, or that it alters our dna in any way is simply wrong.
Well...I don't claim to know anything about the above concerns, but I do know what I observed out here on the 'lone prairie' nearly 20-years ago when DOD & other 'intelligence' agencies were testing Tesla technology on the ionosphere - creating a plasma state - which directly provoked all sorts of havoc with natural weather systems and loaded the atmosphere & soil with conductive particulate.

At times, atmospheric electrical energy was so intense we witnessed auroras that 'hummed', domes of pulsing light extending from horizon to horizon, ball lightning, lightning w/o thunder, spontaneous widespread grass fires, and disrupted power. On some nights, sleep was impossible due to the intensity of ambient charges. I should also note that during that particular summer more than a normal number of men, especially in their middle-age, died from heart attacks. I wouldn't know that particular correlation, but these were otherwise healthy hard-working farm types.

At that time, I owned two microchipped hounds. When this 'testing' was in full swing, they found refuge in the dairy barn between cement walls where cows had previously been brought in to be milked. Normally, those two would be out exploring. Both died prematurely, one from a migrating microchip which paralyzed him when it lodged in his spine; the other from a combination of exposure to neurotoxins (common farm chemicals) and increasing anxiety.

You may have access to 'scientific' literature which debunks the health concerns of ordinary people, but my observations along with answer to prayers regarding what I was witnessing convince me there is profound health risk for all living organisms from the militarized use of electromagnetic energy - including the proliferation of cell phone technology.

Interesting observation from a 1971 Ensign article written by Edwin Brown Firmage: https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/stu ... s?lang=eng

Other weapons systems include chemical weapons, from blister and blood gases to anticrop and antivegetation chemicals and psychic poisons capable of producing temporary or permanent schizophrenia. Biological weapons include those resulting in bubonic and pneumonic plagues, anthrax, smallpox, and Rocky Mountain spotted fever, with genetic mutations to organisms to insure that vaccines given as civil defense will be of no use. Delivery systems are sufficient to affect large portions of the populations of nations.

Weapons systems of the near future may include geophysical techniques to alter weather, cause earthquakes or drought, and perhaps alter the nature of the atmosphere.
Eastlund Patent info mostly 'taken' directly from Tesla's work. http://www.eastlundscience.com/patentsb1.html
Twenty years ago, US Patents of this type were directly accessible via internet. I found substantiating 'white papers' in military libraries which were also directly accessible.

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: November 30th, 2020, 4:50 pm
by Toto
Is COVID-19 Being Blamed for 5G Radiation Sickness?

COVID-19 is a Smokescreen for 5G Radiation Sickness

Studies Prove Connection Between 5G and COVID-19 Symptoms

5G Explains Cruise Ship COVID-19 Outbreak

Wuhan is China’s Experimental City For 5G

What Does 5G Do To Humans?

What Science Calls Viruses May Really Be Exosomes

Germ Theory of Diseases Spread by Viruses Has Never Been Proven

The COVID-19 PCR Test is Detecting DNA Found in All Humans

The PCR Test is Generating False-Positive COVID-19 Results

All this and more at https://greatmountainpublishing.com/202 ... poisoning/

Re: 5G: Can Someone Convince Me 5G is Dangerous?

Posted: December 21st, 2020, 2:34 pm
by jim
Here's an article with a link (https://zoryglaser.com/) to searchable database of 4000 studies and papers on the harm of regular wireless technology (WIFI, RF, Microwaves).

And here's a brief synopsis. This was compiled by a researcher, Zorach (Zory) Glaser Ph.D., LT, MSC, USNR, who worked for the "spans decades working for the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Public Health Service, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Bureau of Radiological Health."