LDS Freedom Forum

.

.

prew wrote: ↑May 6th, 2021, 9:37 am . . . . . Here is more science about the resistance to covid-19 illness.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 3221001141
These scientists identified which virus gave the resistance to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It was the shell of the virus nucleus that creates the anti-bodies for Covid-2 immunity.
The mRNA drug therapy that is being promoted is using the wrong part of the virus, these mRNA drug therapies should be coding for the nucleus shell not the spike protein.

The article didn't seem to make this case. From my reading of it, it was saying that of those people who had SARS-CoV-2 and also had HCoV OC43 (an earlier cold-causing coronavirus) antibodies, developed only mild SARS-CoV-2 symptoms. Those from the study group who did not have these antibodies were likely to get very sick from their SARS-CoV-2 infection.

This implies to me that their T-Cell epitopes for HCoV OC43 were very similar to those that would be developed for SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins. I.e., little genetic difference between them.

Now your contention may be correct, I don't know; but you would have to research just why they settled on the alleged SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to elicit an immune reaction vs. the virus shell itself. My guess is, they had good reasons for doing this.

Interesting read:
"Israeli People Committee’s Report Find Catastrophic Side Effects Of Pfizer Vaccine To Every System In Human Body"

https://greatgameindia.com/israel-repor ... VQWlnegJco

"Over 245 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 3, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 4,178 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA physicians review each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports."
CDC Website

CDC: As Many People Have Died From Covid-19 Vaccines As ALL Vaccines In Last 20 Years COMBINED
https://conservativeplaybook.com/2021/0 ... -combined/

To those saying these deaths are coincidences. If this were true, we would be able to correlate the same coincidental deaths to other vaccines in previous years as a ratio to the Covid vaccine. This is NOT the case. Coincidental deaths do not show up after other vaccines were administered anywhere close to what we're seeing now.

This is a probation - only so much time is given for us
The time to choose to be in the first resurrection or terrestrial kingdom is so close. No second chances.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/former-fd ... Daily%20PM

Former FDA chief says now is the time to begin lifting mask mandates: 'As aggressively as we put them in'

CHRIS ENLOE
May 08, 2021

Scott Gottlieb, former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, said this week that indoor mask mandates should begin to be lifted immediately, saying vaccine efficacy means the government should relax pandemic-related restrictions.

In fact, Gottlieb said Thursday that if the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not begin encouraging the lifting of mask mandates, they will quickly lose credibility.

"I think we should start lifting these restrictions as aggressively as we put them in," Gottlieb told CNBC host Shepard Smith.

"We need to preserve the credibility of public health officials to perhaps reimplement some of these provisions as we get into next winter, if we do start seeing outbreaks again," he continued. "And the only way to earn public credibility is to demonstrate you're willing to relax these provisions when the situation improves. That's what gives you the credibility to implement them when things worsen."

Overall, Gottlieb predicted the COVID-19 situation in the U.S. will only continue to improve, yet another reason to relax or rescind mask mandates.

"Even if vaccination rates are slowing, we're still going to continue to chip away at getting more people vaccinated," he said, "but I think that these gains are locked in, and the summer looks very good."

The CDC, under President Joe Biden's leadership, does not agree with Gottlieb.

Despite finally updating mask guidance allowing fully vaccinated individuals to go outside without wearing a face mask under most circumstances, the CDC still says all people, regardless of their vaccine status, should wear a mask indoors.


Surprisingly, as vaccination rates slow because the people most enthusiastic about vaccines have already received their shots, the CDC and other public health officials who were aggressive with restrictions are not using mask mandate rescission as an incentive for more people to get vaccinated.

However, polling data suggest such incentives would work.

In one recent study, researchers discovered an overall increase of 13% in vaccine eagerness if it meant mask mandates become a thing of the past.

In Canada they arrested 2 rebels yesterday, rebels that were speaking out against the covid1984

https://westernstandardonline.com/2021/ ... -lockdown/

.

President Nelson's best buddy wants to track all of us with microchips, and no one who has been defending him has any comment?

.

I'm sorry friends, this is not going away.

Fake Facebook Groups Fight against anti-vaxers
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57051691

McDonalds Promotes Vaccinations
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/11/business ... index.html

UK Adding Vaccine Passport to App
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/t ... li=BBnbklE

tribrac wrote: ↑May 11th, 2021, 8:25 am I'm sorry friends, this is not going away.

Fake Facebook Groups Fight against anti-vaxers
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57051691

McDonalds Promotes Vaccinations
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/11/business ... index.html

UK Adding Vaccine Passport to App
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/t ... li=BBnbklE

I knew the UK wouldn't be able to withstand the pressure for implementing the vax passports..... I'm undecided about US so far, but if I was a betting man I'd put my money on US requiring 'vax passports' to some degree too in the soon future

Cruiserdude wrote: ↑May 11th, 2021, 8:31 am

tribrac wrote: ↑May 11th, 2021, 8:25 am I'm sorry friends, this is not going away.

Fake Facebook Groups Fight against anti-vaxers
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57051691

McDonalds Promotes Vaccinations
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/11/business ... index.html

UK Adding Vaccine Passport to App
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/t ... li=BBnbklE

I knew the UK wouldn't be able to withstand the pressure for implementing the vax passports..... I'm undecided about US so far, but if I was a betting man I'd put my money on US requiring 'vax passports' to some degree too in the soon future

Of course we will have vax passports, in fact, the American people will be begging for them, just like they are begging for the literal godsend.

Dems are quiet about it. Which means they are mindful of the mid-term elections. So they will do what they usually do and have a few local governments ennact vaccine passports (New York, SF, and city of Washington DC) and then press the corporations to enforce it on the rest of us.

Airlines, cruise ships, ammusement parks, sports leagues, hotels, rental cars. Colleges, universities, hospitals.

It will become increasingly difficult to opperate in our society without it. Choices must be made.

Another AmazingPolly video. This one is great to share with your normie friends, lots of logical points she brings up.

THIS ISN'T ABOUT A VIRUS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dc902i3d2FYk/

tribrac wrote: ↑May 11th, 2021, 10:59 am Dems are quiet about it. Which means they are mindful of the mid-term elections. So they will do what they usually do and have a few local governments ennact vaccine passports (New York, SF, and city of Washington DC) and then press the corporations to enforce it on the rest of us.

Airlines, cruise ships, ammusement parks, sports leagues, hotels, rental cars. Colleges, universities, hospitals.

It will become increasingly difficult to opperate in our society without it. Choices must be made.

O Babylon, O Babylon, we bid thee farewell;
We're going to get the heck out of dodge to dwell

TrueFaith wrote: ↑May 11th, 2021, 11:20 am Another AmazingPolly video. This one is great to share with your normie friends, lots of logical points she brings up.

THIS ISN'T ABOUT A VIRUS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dc902i3d2FYk/

Very good video.

The church is so wrong to be going along with all these things.

Rand Paul questions Anthony Fauci on National Institute of Health funding of Wuhan 'gain of function' (weaponization) research in which viruses are made more lethal by genetic engineering.

InfoWarrior82 wrote: ↑May 10th, 2021, 3:15 pm President Nelson's best buddy wants to track all of us with microchips, and no one who has been defending him has any comment?

Personally, I find accusatory hyperbole off-putting.

larsenb wrote: ↑May 11th, 2021, 3:16 pm

InfoWarrior82 wrote: ↑May 10th, 2021, 3:15 pm President Nelson's best buddy wants to track all of us with microchips, and no one who has been defending him has any comment?

Personally, I find accusatory hyperbole off-putting.

I find covenanting and signing our church onto the will of Klaus Schwab and United Nations off-putting. You're not really upset with me, you're upset with President Nelson.



When I say that our church has "covenanted" with the United Nations Agenda 2030 and Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum, I'm not exaggerating or being hyperbolic. It's right there in black & white:

https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handl ... sAllowed=y
Archived here in case they take it down: (https://archive.is/msbtv)

ANNEX III – TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR MULTI-FAITH
ADVISORY COUNCIL
The UN Inter-Agency Task Force on Religion
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR MULTI-FAITH/FBO ADVISORY COUNCIL
BACKGROUND
The United Nations Interagency Task Force on Religion and Sustainable Development
(IATF-Religion) was set up in 2010, to provide policy guidance around engaging with faithbased actors, deepen UN system staff capacities on/around intersections of religion with the
UN pillars of development, human rights and peace and security dynamics, as well as
provide strategic policy guidance on the above.
The Advisory Council of Faith-Based Organizations to the UN IATF-Religion is an
informal and voluntary entity, composed of the UN system’s faith-based partners, reflecting
the diversity of religions, regional and national presence, and covering thematic areas which
mirror the UN’s mandate.

THEMATIC AREAS OF FOCUS AGREED SHARED STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
BETWEEN UN AND FBO PARTNERS[1] for THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINING PEACE AGENDA:
 Environment (including forests, climate change and resource efficiency)
 Migration (including children, trafficking, education)
 Gender Justice
 Financing for Development
 Peacemaking and Security (including food security, peace-building and reconciliation, and
humanitarian engagement)

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ADVISORY COUNCIL
The Advisory Council will provide strategic advise to the UN Interagency Task Force in
order to:
o Support the United Nations system through strengthened human rights’ based policy
advocacy within and outside of the UN system;
o Support in coordinating direct and systematic outreach, interaction and engagement with
faith-based and faith-inspired entities, and between faith-based NGOs and UN entities;
and
o Enhance focus on and knowledge around religious representation and dynamics at and
within the United Nations.


The Advisory Council shall abide by the rules, regulations and principles of the United
Nations, and be composed according to the common guidelines for NGO engagement in the
UN system.

To that end, the DUTIES/ RESPONSIBILTIES of the Advisory Council shall include:
 Taking the lead to co-design and implement (at least) one annual joint UN IATF-R and FBO
Strategic Review of Partnerships, as well as contribute to the Annual Symposia on Religion
and Foreign Affairs.
 Promoting and raising awareness on the work of the United Nations within their respective
networks and constituencies globally through advocacy and outreach initiatives - using both
traditional and new media.
 Serving as, and advising as regards to, speakers at United Nations meetings, workshops and
conferences on the above agreed upon themed areas, as and when required by the UN IATFR members.
 Providing a short Report annually on its activities, assessment of impact, and
recommendations to enhance policy coordination and collaboration, to be included in the
UN IATF-Religion Annual Report, which is shared with the UN System and diverse partner
entities.

MEMBERSHIP and ELIGIBILITY
 The FBO Advisory Council shall be composed of faith-based and/or faith-inspired legally
registered NGOs (at least in one member state) who have partnered (or are partnering) on
advocacy, and/or are implementing partners of/with UN system entity members of the UN
IATF-R, with a preference for those with, or in the process of seeking ECOSOC
accreditation.
 Members will act within the capacity as Advisory Council members, and officially represent
such, as and when requested or approved by the UN IATF-R.

SELECTION of MEMBERS
Advisory Council Members will be selected by UN system members of the UN IATF-R
according to the “Criteria for Religious Engagement” developed by the UN Task Force.
Each UN member of the UN IATF-R will be asked to nominate between 3-5 partner FBOs.
The FBOs nominated by more than one entity will be prioritized for the short list.
In addition to an established track record of acting in conformity with UN values and
principles, and giving preference to those with UN-ECOSOC accreditation, the criteria for
selection of which FBOs serve as Advisory Council members require a balance of the
following:
 Religious organizational representation (i.e. covering diverse
religions/faiths/denominations, ecumenical and interfaith);
 Thematic area(s) of expertise and interventions (development, humanitarian, human rights
and peace and security);
 Gender;
 Youth; and
 Presence (global, regional and local).


STRUCTURE
The Advisory Council should not exceed forty FBO Representatives.
The Members may choose Co-Chairs if deemed helpful to communication among each other.
The Co-Chairs should represent diverse faith-based entities.

TERM
FBOs will be appointed for a one year term, renewable for a total of two additional years.

DECISION-MAKING
If and when necessary, each organizational member of the Council shall have one equal
vote.
Any externally appointed advisors/observers will have observer status and no voting power.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE UN IATF-R TOWARDS THE FAITH-BASED
ADVISORY GROUP
 Make available materials on the work of the United Nations and emerging issues related to
religion, religious engagement, and each UN Task Force relevant report, data or analysis;
 Encourage the inclusion of FBO Advisory Council members in activities and initiatives of
the United Nations’ members of IATF-R;
 Disseminate the relevant publications and programme materials and outcomes of the FBO
Advisory Council Members among the UN entities and operational offices;
 Provide policy, strategic, tactical advise and facilitation/mediation and connectivity with
and within UN entities, to FBO Advisory Council members if/when requested;
 When available, UN Task Force members may provide resources to support the
implementation of Advisory Council Members’ activities based on mutual consent between
the FBO and the UN entity/entities. However, members of the FBO Advisory Council will
not receive any remuneration from the UN IATF-R.

COMMUNICATION with the UN IATF-REL
The Advisory Council members will communicate with all members of the UN IATF-REL,
and can do so either individually (keeping all members copied/informed), or choose to do
so via the IATF-R Convenor/Chair.

TERMINATION of MEMBERSHIP
Members of the Advisory Council will be removed by the UN IATF-REL members, if the
UN entity/entities deem a misuse the UN logo, flag or engagement in activities contrary to
the Organization’s principles.


WE SIGNED THE NAME OF CHRIST'S CHURCH ON THE DOTTED LINE BELOW:

APPENDIX IV – MEMBERS OF THE FAITH ADVISORY
COUNCIL OF THE UN INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE ON
RELIGION (2018-2019)
ACT Alliance
Adventist Development and Relief
Agency/ADRA
Al-Azhar University:
Observatory for Tolerance and Dialogue
Centre for Population Studies
Alliance of Religions and Conservation/ARC
Arigatou Inteernational
Bunmi Project @ the Oxford Center for Hindu
Studies
Church of Latter Day Saints/LDS
Church of Sweden
Finn Church Aid/FCA
GIWA (Global Interfaith WASH Alliance)
Global One
GreenFaith
Inter-Religious Climate and Ecology Network
INERELA/International Network of Religious
Leaders Living With HIVandAIDS
Islamic Foundation for Ecology and Sciences
Islamic Relief Worldwide
Jewish Theological Seminary – Milstein
Center, USA
KAICIID Dialogue Centre
Lutheran World Federation/LWF
Musawah
Muslims for Progressive Values (MPV)
Parliament of World Religions (PoWR)
45
Princeton University - Office of Religious Life
& The Chapel
Rabita Muhammadiya, Centre for Research
and Studies
Anglical Communion with plus Rose Castle
Foundation
Sant Egidio
Tzu Chi Buddhist Foundation
Tanenbaum
The Interfaith Center of Sustainable
Development
The Network for Religious and Traditional
Peacemakers
United Religions Initiative
World WYCA
World Evangelical Alliance/WEA
Worldvision International


https://www.peacemakersnetwork.org/mult ... 20Advisory,)%2C%20was%20established%20in%202018.

About the Multi-faith Advisory Council

The Multi-faith Advisory Council (MFAC), an informal and voluntary entity that consists of more than 40 religious leaders and heads of faith-based organizations (FBOs), was established in 2018. The composition of the Council reflects the diversity of religions, regional and national presence, and covers different thematic areas that mirror the UN’s mandate. The MFAC, which serves as a unique space for convening faith-based partners as advisors to the United Nations, in their human rights, peace and security, and sustainable development efforts, is committed to uphold multilateralism and international human rights through multi-faith collaboration around/for Agenda 2030.

What? Don't they know they are supposed to use the correct name of the church?

FAITH IN THE UN

What's not to like? I suppose they meant that there are religions that have faith in the U.N., but it also reads like people should have faith in the U.N.

Chip wrote: ↑May 11th, 2021, 5:31 pm FAITH IN THE UN

What's not to like? I suppose they meant that there are religions that have faith in the U.N., but it also reads like people should have faith in the U.N.

Come on Chip, have a little faith in Satan. That’s the cool thing to do these days.