Page 2 of 3

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 23rd, 2020, 9:42 pm
by Zathura
mahalanobis wrote: February 23rd, 2020, 9:36 pm
mahalanobis wrote: February 23rd, 2020, 9:28 pm
Zathura wrote: February 23rd, 2020, 9:22 pm If BYU and the Church wasn't worried about making money and prestige they could close it's doors to anyone who isn't sealed in the Temple. Checkmate 8-) Makes it easier for young married couples to find affordable housing in Provo too.

Let the young single adults go to UVU and the U
Could put a major emphasis on post-grad degrees and research for older more mature students. Admittance requires:
- a bachelor's with good grades
- work experience after graduation
- marriage in the temple

This actually describes what I did. I only did Masters at BYU and coincidentally had all those boxes checked (not that I was trying, or planning that)
I'll add that when you go to BYU under these conditions, you are 100% out of the social scene (because you have legit responsibilities and you're there for a very specific reason), so 90% of the cultural issues are "out of sight, out of mind".

If that happened to every student, BYU would be much less of a joke.

But yes, I agree that the church would never be interested in this.
Absolutely. From my experience as a married college student working full time, I couldn’t tell you a thing about my university. Never knew the policies, the parties, the fundraising, controversies. Nada. No time. March to class with head down listening to music, sprint back to the car to get to work.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 23rd, 2020, 10:24 pm
by Rick Grimes
I think there are some great ideas that have been offered here. It's a shame leadership believes that BYU is such a gem for our church.

At the very least, they should stop funding it with tithing funds and let it support itself on the tuitions of those who attend the University. If the church can legally afford to remove instructors who are known to facilitate anti-mormon tripe, that would go a long way to cleaning this mess up.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 24th, 2020, 7:00 pm
by Silver Pie
i'mnotspecial wrote: February 23rd, 2020, 7:22 pm I've heard some say we should expand the MTC, but I doubt that we'd have need of that much land and that many buildings for an MTC.

Anyone else have ideas for what could be done with that land and those buildings?
A homeless shelter? A food kitchen? Both?

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 5:04 am
by Ferrisbueller
Think deep guys.

BYU is a mechanism to transfer tithes from the country of Canada. Face value it's a college. Liberal attacks happening.. the church got itself in this mess.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 6:04 am
by simpleton
My understanding of the purpose of the BYU initially, at the beginning, was to have teachers who were imbued with Gods Spirit, to teach with Gods Spirit. And I think that should be the only way to teach. Anything more or less cometh of evil.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 6:29 am
by Lizzy60
simpleton wrote: February 25th, 2020, 6:04 am My understanding of the purpose of the BYU initially, at the beginning, was to have teachers who were imbued with Gods Spirit, to teach with Gods Spirit. And I think that should be the only way to teach. Anything more or less cometh of evil.
We now have members of the Church, including professors at BYU, who believe that gay marriage is righteous, holy, and will be found in the celestial kingdom. They believe those who teach LDS gay youth that acting on homosexual temptations are the ones teaching false doctrine.

We are seeing the turning of things upside-down, of evil called good, and good called evil, and there is no going back.

None of us want students persecuting LGBT people, even those kissing on campus, but saying anything negative is going to get them in hot water with the Honor Code. We have now asked them to remain silent in the face of evil.

The Board of Trustees has the power to put a stop to this, but maybe there is too much at stake (125B).

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 9:32 am
by 4Joshua8
Robin Hood wrote: February 21st, 2020, 5:01 pm What is the purpose of BYU?

I looked more into this and found the following information:

"President Young saw the dangers of false philosophies and desired Church schools to combat them. The two primary concerns that rested upon President Young were evolution (Darwinian evolution) and Marxism (socialism/communism). The Presidents of the Church have continually warned of the dangers of teaching that man descended from lower forms of life and President Young was no exception. President Young felt that the theories of Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley, who was known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his advocacy of the theories of organic evolution, were corrupting the youth among the Saints in his day. Another prominent Darwinist, Louis Compton Miall, was also noted as a threat to the youth. Because of this, President Young used his own financial means to create an academy where these false philosophies could be refuted. This Academy was named Brigham Young Academy and later became Brigham Young University. Brother Hugh Nibley once commented that the purpose of Brigham Young University as envisioned by Brigham Young was to confront the false doctrines promoted in Darwinian evolution."
- Joseph Smith Foundation


“We have enough and to spare, at present in these mountains, of schools where young infidels are made because the teachers are so tender-footed that they dare not mention the principles of the gospel to their pupils, but have no hesitancy in introducing into the classroom the theories of Huxley, of Darwin, or of Miall, and the false political economy which contends against co-operation and the United Order . . . this course I am resolutely and uncompromisingly opposed to, and I hope to see the day when the doctrines of the gospel will be taught in all our schools, when the revelation of the Lord will be our texts, and our books will be written and manufactured by ourselves and in our own midst. As a beginning in this direction I have endowed the Brigham Young Academy at Provo.”
Brigham Young


We have no choice at BYU except to “hold the line” regarding gospel standards and values and to draw men and women from other campuses also–all we can–into this same posture, for people entangled in sin are not free. In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom. We do not resist such ideas because we fear them, but because they are false. . . . When the pressures mount for us to follow the false ways of the world, we hope in the years yet future that those who are part of this University and the Church Educational System will not attempt to counsel the Board of Trustees to follow in false ways. We want, through your administration, to receive all your suggestions for making BYU even better. I hope none will presume on the prerogatives of the prophets of God to set the basic direction for this University. No man comes to the demanding position of the Presidency of the Church except his heart and mind are constantly open to the impressions, insights, and revelations of God.”
Spencer W. Kimball


Did you see that by Kimball?
"In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom."

Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. My how hard we've stumbled.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 9:37 am
by Lizzy60
i'mnotspecial wrote: February 25th, 2020, 9:32 am
Robin Hood wrote: February 21st, 2020, 5:01 pm What is the purpose of BYU?

I looked more into this and found the following information:

"President Young saw the dangers of false philosophies and desired Church schools to combat them. The two primary concerns that rested upon President Young were evolution (Darwinian evolution) and Marxism (socialism/communism). The Presidents of the Church have continually warned of the dangers of teaching that man descended from lower forms of life and President Young was no exception. President Young felt that the theories of Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley, who was known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his advocacy of the theories of organic evolution, were corrupting the youth among the Saints in his day. Another prominent Darwinist, Louis Compton Miall, was also noted as a threat to the youth. Because of this, President Young used his own financial means to create an academy where these false philosophies could be refuted. This Academy was named Brigham Young Academy and later became Brigham Young University. Brother Hugh Nibley once commented that the purpose of Brigham Young University as envisioned by Brigham Young was to confront the false doctrines promoted in Darwinian evolution."
- Joseph Smith Foundation


“We have enough and to spare, at present in these mountains, of schools where young infidels are made because the teachers are so tender-footed that they dare not mention the principles of the gospel to their pupils, but have no hesitancy in introducing into the classroom the theories of Huxley, of Darwin, or of Miall, and the false political economy which contends against co-operation and the United Order . . . this course I am resolutely and uncompromisingly opposed to, and I hope to see the day when the doctrines of the gospel will be taught in all our schools, when the revelation of the Lord will be our texts, and our books will be written and manufactured by ourselves and in our own midst. As a beginning in this direction I have endowed the Brigham Young Academy at Provo.”
Brigham Young


We have no choice at BYU except to “hold the line” regarding gospel standards and values and to draw men and women from other campuses also–all we can–into this same posture, for people entangled in sin are not free. In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom. We do not resist such ideas because we fear them, but because they are false. . . . When the pressures mount for us to follow the false ways of the world, we hope in the years yet future that those who are part of this University and the Church Educational System will not attempt to counsel the Board of Trustees to follow in false ways. We want, through your administration, to receive all your suggestions for making BYU even better. I hope none will presume on the prerogatives of the prophets of God to set the basic direction for this University. No man comes to the demanding position of the Presidency of the Church except his heart and mind are constantly open to the impressions, insights, and revelations of God.”
Spencer W. Kimball


Did you see that by Kimball?
"In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom."

Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. My how hard we've stumbled.
Evolution, socialism, and now HOMOSEXUALITY! My how hard we have fallen.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 10:07 am
by markharr
Sorry for the vulgar part but he's not entirely wrong.

“If you want to get laid, go to college. If you want an education, go to the library.”

― Frank Zappa

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 12:49 pm
by Allison
i'mnotspecial wrote: February 25th, 2020, 9:32 am
Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. My how hard we've stumbled.
Yes, and this is especially painful for parents who sent their children for a wholesome education (BYU-I, no less) and found them all misled in many ways—socialism, evolution, climate woke, pro-gay, and even one is pro-choice. In our family, only one seems to have escaped unscathed.

All of this is deeply painful on a personal level to parents who raised their children with great care and diligence.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 9:52 pm
by Contemplator
Let’s see, the board of trustees is the first presidency, 4 apostles, and a number of general organization presidents. They approved the change to the honor code. They approve every professor hired. What if it turns out that what they should do is just what they are doing?

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 10:06 pm
by Lizzy60
Contemplator wrote: February 25th, 2020, 9:52 pm Let’s see, the board of trustees is the first presidency, 4 apostles, and a number of general organization presidents. They approved the change to the honor code. They approve every professor hired. What if it turns out that what they should do is just what they are doing?
And what if it turns out that it's not? They themselves have told us that they are capable of making mistakes.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 25th, 2020, 10:14 pm
by Contemplator
Lizzy60 wrote: February 25th, 2020, 10:06 pm
Contemplator wrote: February 25th, 2020, 9:52 pm Let’s see, the board of trustees is the first presidency, 4 apostles, and a number of general organization presidents. They approved the change to the honor code. They approve every professor hired. What if it turns out that what they should do is just what they are doing?
And what if it turns out that it's not? They themselves have told us that they are capable of making mistakes.
I agree with you that it is reasonable to ask what you are asking. It just makes our church life far more difficult than when we just accepted the counsel to “follow the prophet.”

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 26th, 2020, 12:03 pm
by Thinker
i'mnotspecial wrote: February 23rd, 2020, 7:22 pm I've heard some say we should expand the MTC, but I doubt that we'd have need of that much land and that many buildings for an MTC.

Anyone else have ideas for what could be done with that land and those buildings?
Humanitarian service mission education, training & service headquarters. That’s what Christ would do, IMO.

Image

Image

Image

Unfortunately such a switch to helping “the least of these” will likely NOT happen with God’s money given to the church, so I prefer finding more honest, reputable ways to help:
https://www.charitynavigator.org/

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 26th, 2020, 12:10 pm
by Trucker
I think the fight is already here. The church needs to decide to keep it's teaching. Do what is right, let the consequence follow. Even if that mean losing accreditation.

If the trustees (the 12) do nothing, it will both allow this mentality to spread through all the wards and it will show that they are really powerless to lead their own organization.

If nothing is done about BYU, then a whole lot of strong families who send their kids to BYU because it upholds the church's teachings, are going to be pretty upset and lost as to what to do.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 26th, 2020, 12:38 pm
by ori
i'mnotspecial wrote: February 25th, 2020, 9:32 am
Robin Hood wrote: February 21st, 2020, 5:01 pm What is the purpose of BYU?

I looked more into this and found the following information:

"President Young saw the dangers of false philosophies and desired Church schools to combat them. The two primary concerns that rested upon President Young were evolution (Darwinian evolution) and Marxism (socialism/communism). The Presidents of the Church have continually warned of the dangers of teaching that man descended from lower forms of life and President Young was no exception. President Young felt that the theories of Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley, who was known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his advocacy of the theories of organic evolution, were corrupting the youth among the Saints in his day. Another prominent Darwinist, Louis Compton Miall, was also noted as a threat to the youth. Because of this, President Young used his own financial means to create an academy where these false philosophies could be refuted. This Academy was named Brigham Young Academy and later became Brigham Young University. Brother Hugh Nibley once commented that the purpose of Brigham Young University as envisioned by Brigham Young was to confront the false doctrines promoted in Darwinian evolution."
- Joseph Smith Foundation


“We have enough and to spare, at present in these mountains, of schools where young infidels are made because the teachers are so tender-footed that they dare not mention the principles of the gospel to their pupils, but have no hesitancy in introducing into the classroom the theories of Huxley, of Darwin, or of Miall, and the false political economy which contends against co-operation and the United Order . . . this course I am resolutely and uncompromisingly opposed to, and I hope to see the day when the doctrines of the gospel will be taught in all our schools, when the revelation of the Lord will be our texts, and our books will be written and manufactured by ourselves and in our own midst. As a beginning in this direction I have endowed the Brigham Young Academy at Provo.”
Brigham Young


We have no choice at BYU except to “hold the line” regarding gospel standards and values and to draw men and women from other campuses also–all we can–into this same posture, for people entangled in sin are not free. In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom. We do not resist such ideas because we fear them, but because they are false. . . . When the pressures mount for us to follow the false ways of the world, we hope in the years yet future that those who are part of this University and the Church Educational System will not attempt to counsel the Board of Trustees to follow in false ways. We want, through your administration, to receive all your suggestions for making BYU even better. I hope none will presume on the prerogatives of the prophets of God to set the basic direction for this University. No man comes to the demanding position of the Presidency of the Church except his heart and mind are constantly open to the impressions, insights, and revelations of God.”
Spencer W. Kimball


Did you see that by Kimball?
"In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom."

Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. My how hard we've stumbled.
Don't many of the apostles personally believe in universal common ancestry? And if not that, then common ancestry for all living things except humans?

What you quoted above is interesting because BYU absolutely does teach evolution. Brigham has been rolling in his grave for decades.

The board of trustees no doubt approves of the teaching of evolution.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 26th, 2020, 12:56 pm
by justme
ori wrote: February 26th, 2020, 12:38 pm
i'mnotspecial wrote: February 25th, 2020, 9:32 am
Robin Hood wrote: February 21st, 2020, 5:01 pm What is the purpose of BYU?

I looked more into this and found the following information:

"President Young saw the dangers of false philosophies and desired Church schools to combat them. The two primary concerns that rested upon President Young were evolution (Darwinian evolution) and Marxism (socialism/communism). The Presidents of the Church have continually warned of the dangers of teaching that man descended from lower forms of life and President Young was no exception. President Young felt that the theories of Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley, who was known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his advocacy of the theories of organic evolution, were corrupting the youth among the Saints in his day. Another prominent Darwinist, Louis Compton Miall, was also noted as a threat to the youth. Because of this, President Young used his own financial means to create an academy where these false philosophies could be refuted. This Academy was named Brigham Young Academy and later became Brigham Young University. Brother Hugh Nibley once commented that the purpose of Brigham Young University as envisioned by Brigham Young was to confront the false doctrines promoted in Darwinian evolution."
- Joseph Smith Foundation


“We have enough and to spare, at present in these mountains, of schools where young infidels are made because the teachers are so tender-footed that they dare not mention the principles of the gospel to their pupils, but have no hesitancy in introducing into the classroom the theories of Huxley, of Darwin, or of Miall, and the false political economy which contends against co-operation and the United Order . . . this course I am resolutely and uncompromisingly opposed to, and I hope to see the day when the doctrines of the gospel will be taught in all our schools, when the revelation of the Lord will be our texts, and our books will be written and manufactured by ourselves and in our own midst. As a beginning in this direction I have endowed the Brigham Young Academy at Provo.”
Brigham Young


We have no choice at BYU except to “hold the line” regarding gospel standards and values and to draw men and women from other campuses also–all we can–into this same posture, for people entangled in sin are not free. In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom. We do not resist such ideas because we fear them, but because they are false. . . . When the pressures mount for us to follow the false ways of the world, we hope in the years yet future that those who are part of this University and the Church Educational System will not attempt to counsel the Board of Trustees to follow in false ways. We want, through your administration, to receive all your suggestions for making BYU even better. I hope none will presume on the prerogatives of the prophets of God to set the basic direction for this University. No man comes to the demanding position of the Presidency of the Church except his heart and mind are constantly open to the impressions, insights, and revelations of God.”
Spencer W. Kimball


Did you see that by Kimball?
"In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom."

Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. My how hard we've stumbled.
Don't many of the apostles personally believe in universal common ancestry? And if not that, then common ancestry for all living things except humans?

What you quoted above is interesting because BYU absolutely does teach evolution. Brigham has been rolling in his grave for decades.

The board of trustees no doubt approves of the teaching of evolution.
Four of the current Q15 were university presidents. There is no question that the board approves of the teaching of evolution.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 26th, 2020, 8:55 pm
by Alexander
BYU can’t turn back now. They’ve passed the tipping point of no return. The church won’t be able to hardly anything with BYU. So it honestly won’t matter what my small opinion is on this forum. I wish the church didn’t change the honor code policy. But it’s too late.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 26th, 2020, 9:55 pm
by mahalanobis
TylerDurden wrote: February 26th, 2020, 8:55 pm BYU can’t turn back now. They’ve passed the tipping point of no return. The church won’t be able to hardly anything with BYU. So it honestly won’t matter what my small opinion is on this forum. I wish the church didn’t change the honor code policy. But it’s too late.
We've got roughly 50 regulars (forum members who post and vote in the forum polls), maybe 100 if we're being optimistic. Then probably a few hundred regular readers who don't have accounts or just choose not to post. Maybe MAYBE a few thousand sporadic readers. (I'll gladly stand corrected on these numbers BTW).

Compare that to the MBB crowd and the millions of neutral members. Our collective voice is a small one indeed. Reminds me of David and Goliath. Maybe there's a David out there who can take on this LGBT giant (the giant we keep retreating from at every turn).

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 26th, 2020, 11:14 pm
by abijah`
Thinker wrote: February 26th, 2020, 12:03 pm Humanitarian service mission education, training & service headquarters. That’s what Christ would do, IMO.

Image

Image

Image

Unfortunately such a switch to helping “the least of these” will likely NOT happen with God’s money given to the church, so I prefer finding more honest, reputable ways to help:
https://www.charitynavigator.org/
the hunger situation is the result of a defective culture which is the result of bad parenting. there has been a massive abundance of space and natural resources for years and years and years for africans to learn how to farm like all the other more successful and less-hungry peoples around the world have, but they never have.

stop spamming like jesus went around telling people to work and give away that substance to feed other peoples kids half a world away because they are too lazy to do it themselves

these kids who are dying, its terrible - but the solution is not to import foreign resources, utterly anti-self reliance. the solution is to fix the problem with african fathers who have zero issue producing children (which other, wealthier nations now do) but somehow cant seem to produce food with which to feed those children, and you cant do that half a world away, at least in addressing the actual problem and not the mere symptom. local social problems cant be fixed by foreign economic imports - to suppose they can is really superficial thinking, thinker.

you arent preaching charity. you arent preaching what jesus taught.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 27th, 2020, 7:00 am
by ori
abijah` wrote: February 26th, 2020, 11:14 pm
Thinker wrote: February 26th, 2020, 12:03 pm Humanitarian service mission education, training & service headquarters. That’s what Christ would do, IMO.

Image

Image

Image

Unfortunately such a switch to helping “the least of these” will likely NOT happen with God’s money given to the church, so I prefer finding more honest, reputable ways to help:
https://www.charitynavigator.org/
the hunger situation is the result of a defective culture which is the result of bad parenting. there has been a massive abundance of space and natural resources for years and years and years for africans to learn how to farm like all the other more successful and less-hungry peoples around the world have, but they never have.

stop spamming like jesus went around telling people to work and give away that substance to feed other peoples kids half a world away because they are too lazy to do it themselves

these kids who are dying, its terrible - but the solution is not to import foreign resources, utterly anti-self reliance. the solution is to fix the problem with african fathers who have zero issue producing children (which other, wealthier nations now do) but somehow cant seem to produce food with which to feed those children, and you cant do that half a world away, at least in addressing the actual problem and not the mere symptom. local social problems cant be fixed by foreign economic imports - to suppose they can is really superficial thinking, thinker.

you arent preaching charity. you arent preaching what jesus taught.
Yes, there are Africans who don’t like all the aid they receive. When so many shoes are donated by the west, no one there can make a living making shoes. We hurt them by helping so much.

Now, one thing I can get behind is hiring local teams to build water pipes to supply clean water to villages.

https://www.ldsphilanthropies.org/human ... lean-water

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 27th, 2020, 8:40 am
by Thinker
Ori,
You make a good point about humanitarian needing to be local.

As it is, the church has failed in some specific ways:

1) Shipping costs could be avoided by buying locally, plus it would help local economies. Shipping internationally usually costs much more than items being sent!
2) If you’ve toured the church’s SLC humanitarian center, you may have seen a big warehouse with workers standing in several dumpsters full of used, donated clothing - sorting them, then bundling them to be $hipped to poor countries. It turns out this practice actually put poor local clothing vendors out of business because they couldn’t compete with “free.”
3) Humanitarian work has been hindered by stinginess and lack of funding by the church, and when those in charge of funding are clueless sitting at a desk in SLC, thousands of miles from the need, it’s disrupts or terminated projects.

I know the church does some good, and I know especially members serve above and beyond - really amazing! Yet, tithes are not handled right - major improvements are needed, especially in no longer taking increase from those who really don’t have it to give.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 27th, 2020, 8:43 am
by Thinker
Abijah,
Christ was accused of far worse than spamming threads. Yes, I have beat a couple drums around here - because I see important teachings of CHRIST being ignored. And I feel compelled to be a voice to those who have none.

Image

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 27th, 2020, 9:19 am
by lundbaek
I like Rick Grimes' idea: "If the church can legally afford to remove instructors who are known to facilitate anti-mormon tripe, that would go a long way to cleaning this mess up." And there were many there in the late 1960s and early 1970s when I lived in Provo and did some classes on a part-time basis.

Re: What should the institution of the church do about BYU?

Posted: February 27th, 2020, 10:08 am
by Allison
justme wrote: February 26th, 2020, 12:56 pm
ori wrote: February 26th, 2020, 12:38 pm
i'mnotspecial wrote: February 25th, 2020, 9:32 am
Robin Hood wrote: February 21st, 2020, 5:01 pm What is the purpose of BYU?

I looked more into this and found the following information:

"President Young saw the dangers of false philosophies and desired Church schools to combat them. The two primary concerns that rested upon President Young were evolution (Darwinian evolution) and Marxism (socialism/communism). The Presidents of the Church have continually warned of the dangers of teaching that man descended from lower forms of life and President Young was no exception. President Young felt that the theories of Charles Darwin and Thomas Huxley, who was known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his advocacy of the theories of organic evolution, were corrupting the youth among the Saints in his day. Another prominent Darwinist, Louis Compton Miall, was also noted as a threat to the youth. Because of this, President Young used his own financial means to create an academy where these false philosophies could be refuted. This Academy was named Brigham Young Academy and later became Brigham Young University. Brother Hugh Nibley once commented that the purpose of Brigham Young University as envisioned by Brigham Young was to confront the false doctrines promoted in Darwinian evolution."
- Joseph Smith Foundation


“We have enough and to spare, at present in these mountains, of schools where young infidels are made because the teachers are so tender-footed that they dare not mention the principles of the gospel to their pupils, but have no hesitancy in introducing into the classroom the theories of Huxley, of Darwin, or of Miall, and the false political economy which contends against co-operation and the United Order . . . this course I am resolutely and uncompromisingly opposed to, and I hope to see the day when the doctrines of the gospel will be taught in all our schools, when the revelation of the Lord will be our texts, and our books will be written and manufactured by ourselves and in our own midst. As a beginning in this direction I have endowed the Brigham Young Academy at Provo.”
Brigham Young


We have no choice at BYU except to “hold the line” regarding gospel standards and values and to draw men and women from other campuses also–all we can–into this same posture, for people entangled in sin are not free. In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom. We do not resist such ideas because we fear them, but because they are false. . . . When the pressures mount for us to follow the false ways of the world, we hope in the years yet future that those who are part of this University and the Church Educational System will not attempt to counsel the Board of Trustees to follow in false ways. We want, through your administration, to receive all your suggestions for making BYU even better. I hope none will presume on the prerogatives of the prophets of God to set the basic direction for this University. No man comes to the demanding position of the Presidency of the Church except his heart and mind are constantly open to the impressions, insights, and revelations of God.”
Spencer W. Kimball


Did you see that by Kimball?
"In this University (that may to some of our critics seem unfree) there will be real individual freedom. Freedom from worldly ideologies and concepts unshackles man far more than he knows. It is the truth that sets men free. BYU, in its second century, must become the last remaining bastion of resistance to the invading ideologies that seek control of curriculum as well as classroom."

Ouch. Ouch. Ouch. My how hard we've stumbled.
Don't many of the apostles personally believe in universal common ancestry? And if not that, then common ancestry for all living things except humans?

What you quoted above is interesting because BYU absolutely does teach evolution. Brigham has been rolling in his grave for decades.

The board of trustees no doubt approves of the teaching of evolution.
Four of the current Q15 were university presidents. There is no question that the board approves of the teaching of evolution.


How does this inform us of those four apostles’ opinions on evolution? Are we to believe that all university presidents agree with all that is taught at universities? Isn’t that a little silly?