760 Million People On Lockdown!
Posted: February 17th, 2020, 8:52 am
760 Million People On Lockdown!
Your home for discussing politics, the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and the principles of liberty.
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/
What was "click bait" about the video he posted? It's the same thing I've been hearing from people like Dr. John Campbell who are definitely NOT fearmongers or tin-foil hat conspiracy theorists.
Seems like it would have fit nicely in this thread - viewtopic.php?f=1&t=53689 - with an explanation of how 740 million people on "lockdown" might add to the destabilizing nature of the outbreak.Lizzy60 wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 12:24 pmWhat was "click bait" about the video he posted? It's the same thing I've been hearing from people like Dr. John Campbell who are definitely NOT fearmongers or tin-foil hat conspiracy theorists.
I appreciate the posters here who share the things they find. I am adult enough to decide what I believe. The people here at LDSFF are not the run-of-the-mill lemmings who only listen to KSL news and only read Deseret news.
lol, Brian. The reason I said its clickbait is because 760M people is about 3/4ths the entire population of China. While I can easily see China quarantining a large area, I don't think it reached the point where they'd lockdown literally 75% of their population. Thus, It's quite likely that the title is grossly overexaggerating the number of people who have been put into lockdown. Blowing these things out of proportion is only gonna cause more issues and more panic.The Creator wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:20 pmI heard that it's actually 760 Billion People On Lockdown!!! Be afraid.
Some things might be exaggerated but one thing is not. This is serious.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:28 pmlol, Brian. The reason I said its clickbait is because 760M people is about 3/4ths the entire population of China. While I can easily see China quarantining a large area, I don't think it reached the point where they'd lockdown literally 75% of their population. Thus, It's quite likely that the title is grossly overexaggerating the number of people who have been put into lockdown. Blowing these things out of proportion is only gonna cause more issues and more panic.The Creator wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:20 pmI heard that it's actually 760 Billion People On Lockdown!!! Be afraid.
Amen on the potential seriousness of this. But again, we shouldn't lose our heads over it. This stuff is either gonna fufill the prophecies (fully or patially), or it will not. No point is whipping us into hysteria. Thats exactly what the Adversary wants.johnBob wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:31 pmSome things might be exaggerated but one thing is not. This is serious.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:28 pmlol, Brian. The reason I said its clickbait is because 760M people is about 3/4ths the entire population of China. While I can easily see China quarantining a large area, I don't think it reached the point where they'd lockdown literally 75% of their population. Thus, It's quite likely that the title is grossly overexaggerating the number of people who have been put into lockdown. Blowing these things out of proportion is only gonna cause more issues and more panic.The Creator wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:20 pmI heard that it's actually 760 Billion People On Lockdown!!! Be afraid.
In Wuhan, they are now locking everyone inside, they used to allow one person out every so often to get food. Now no one, for how long....
Starvation....
Right there is a balance between concern, losing your #$_& and being ignorant.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:33 pmAmen on the potential seriousness of this. But again, we shouldn't lose our heads over it. This stuff is either gonna fufill the prophecies (fully or patially), or it will not. No point is whipping us into hysteria. Thats exactly what the Adversary wants.johnBob wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:31 pmSome things might be exaggerated but one thing is not. This is serious.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:28 pmlol, Brian. The reason I said its clickbait is because 760M people is about 3/4ths the entire population of China. While I can easily see China quarantining a large area, I don't think it reached the point where they'd lockdown literally 75% of their population. Thus, It's quite likely that the title is grossly overexaggerating the number of people who have been put into lockdown. Blowing these things out of proportion is only gonna cause more issues and more panic.The Creator wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:20 pm
I heard that it's actually 760 Billion People On Lockdown!!! Be afraid.
In Wuhan, they are now locking everyone inside, they used to allow one person out every so often to get food. Now no one, for how long....
Starvation....
Bingo.johnBob wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:34 pmRight there is a balance between concern, losing your #$_& and being ignorant.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:33 pmAmen on the potential seriousness of this. But again, we shouldn't lose our heads over it. This stuff is either gonna fufill the prophecies (fully or patially), or it will not. No point is whipping us into hysteria. Thats exactly what the Adversary wants.johnBob wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:31 pmSome things might be exaggerated but one thing is not. This is serious.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:28 pm
lol, Brian. The reason I said its clickbait is because 760M people is about 3/4ths the entire population of China. While I can easily see China quarantining a large area, I don't think it reached the point where they'd lockdown literally 75% of their population. Thus, It's quite likely that the title is grossly overexaggerating the number of people who have been put into lockdown. Blowing these things out of proportion is only gonna cause more issues and more panic.
In Wuhan, they are now locking everyone inside, they used to allow one person out every so often to get food. Now no one, for how long....
Starvation....
In China, I don't think we will ever know the full scope unless a new government comes in. There is enough video proof that it's bad... Unless you can claim the videos are deep fakes, which is possible but man that would be tough and if true we should just bag it now bc we all screwed if we can't even trust videos now.The Creator wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:34 pm What do we really know about the situation though? Is all the info coming through Chinese government controlled media sources? or is there independent verification? Is that even a thing in China? Are there any independent/rogue media sources?
Just remember if things go wild a lot of people will be losing their ##$_ and I don't want to be around them!Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:35 pmBingo.johnBob wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:34 pmRight there is a balance between concern, losing your #$_& and being ignorant.
If things go wild, that's the time I and many others are more likely to panic... Until then though, best to keep our cool.johnBob wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:39 pmJust remember if things go wild a lot of people will be losing their ##$_ and I don't want to be around them!
Very true, I was more meaning if you are prepared then when everyone else panics you can be inside with a rifle for anyone that comes near. Wait until this calm down a bit.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:41 pmIf things go wild, that's the time I and many others are more likely to panic... Until then though, best to keep our cool.
Their population is over 1.4 billion. This isn't 75%. More like half. 55% live in urban areas. It is pretty reasonable to believe that hundreds of millions are on some sort of lockdown.Durzan wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:28 pmlol, Brian. The reason I said its clickbait is because 760M people is about 3/4ths the entire population of China. While I can easily see China quarantining a large area, I don't think it reached the point where they'd lockdown literally 75% of their population. Thus, It's quite likely that the title is grossly overexaggerating the number of people who have been put into lockdown. Blowing these things out of proportion is only gonna cause more issues and more panic.The Creator wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:20 pmI heard that it's actually 760 Billion People On Lockdown!!! Be afraid.
Comparisons to the flu just do not match at all for this. At the LOW end, this thing has a mortality rate of 2%. Which means IF 45 million people were infected with this 900k would die. About 20% of those who get this are in serious or critical condition, or IF 45 million were infected, 9 million would be critically ill.The Creator wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:42 pm Keep in mind...
cdc.gov:
CDC estimates that influenza has resulted in between 9 million – 45 million illnesses, between 140,000 – 810,000 hospitalizations and between 12,000 – 61,000 deaths annually since 2010 (in the U.S.).
Exactly, that's the key to understanding the "lockdown" thing. "Lockdown" gives the impression of outright quarantine, which it isn't. 760 million people aren't locked in their apartments. It's probably more like 60-80 million in an actual quarantine, which is huge, and the rest have varying levels of restrictions to their travel.Lizzy60 wrote: ↑February 17th, 2020, 4:59 pm From the New York Times, published 2 days ago:
Residential lockdowns of varying strictness — from checkpoints at building entrances to hard limits on going outdoors — now cover at least 760 million people in China, or more than half the country’s population, according to a New York Times analysis of government announcements in provinces and major cities. Many of these people live far from the city of Wuhan, where the virus was first reported and which the government sealed off last month.
Entire article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/15/busi ... kdown.html