I agree, I don't see the stipend as a big deal. The Brethren are also running a huge corporation in addition to their spiritual work.Trucker wrote: ↑December 20th, 2019, 6:58 amI think this is fine. In fact, I wish we had more paid clergy.LukeAir2008 wrote: ↑December 20th, 2019, 6:48 am We know how much all full time GA’s get paid - 10k a month or 120k annually.
That was in January 2014 so they’ve probably had a pay rise since then:
https://mormonleaks.io/wiki/documents/6 ... -01-02.pdf.
I think also giving GAs a stipend frees them up from having to worry about finances, and it should eliminate and desire to get rich, since they get a guaranteed income. At least it makes sense to me in theory. Not sure it's the only or the best option.
Now, one could argue that the Church should never have become a huge corporation, but in the system we have, I believe that a modest salary is reasonable.
Having said that, the salaries of the brethren and all church finances should be fully disclosed to the membership instead of hidden.
The books used to be open, but have been closed since 1959, I believe. That is totally wrong.
It is also wrong that missionaries and members are allowed to bash other faiths for having paid clergy, and claiming that we do not, when in fact our apostles, seventies, and mission presidents are receiving compensation from the Church.
I think our bishops and stake presidents should get a little money, too. The D&C says that Bishops can have some of the tithe money and this used to happen. Now we expect bishops to work full time, and then do their calling as a second full time job. This is wrong. This is also why Bishops can't last more than 5 years before they are completely burned out, unless they happen to own their own business or are retired and don't have to work 40-50 hours a week to make ends meet.
