Page 15 of 29

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 3:39 am
by righteousrepublic
BruceRGilbert wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:54 am
righteousrepublic wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:10 am Matthias wrote: ↑
Sun Dec 22, 2019 12:13 am
Since you brought up the parable of the wheat and the tares, let's talk about it, since it appears that you don't understand it.

I didn't get passed the first sentence because
. . . offense was taken. I don't think it was intended. There is merit in what Matthias has pointed out and, certainly, I would apologize to you for that, but it was needful to bring out some truths not generally understood by many. I learned something, for which I am grateful.
Do you happen to know the history behind Matthias and I? That same tactic of telling me I don't understand something has been used many times. After a time it gets unnerving.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 5:22 am
by Connie561
righteousrepublic wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:10 am
Matthias wrote: December 21st, 2019, 11:13 pmSince you brought up the parable of the wheat and the tares, let's talk about it, since it appears that you don't understand it.
I didn't get passed the first sentence because of your arrogance, judging attitude and pride in yourself. Do you really expect me to take insults and give you credibility? Sorry, that's not how it works. If you decide to settle down and fly right, then we can talk.

Matt 13:38
The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one.

So don't tell me I don't understand it.
You are handling it right. You know they can't have the spirit with them when they insult you with saying it appears you don't understand it. It is best to stop reading that nonsense. I have yet to read something of worth from any of the posters who post like that.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 7:03 am
by righteousrepublic
Connie561 wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 5:22 am
righteousrepublic wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:10 am
Matthias wrote: December 21st, 2019, 11:13 pmSince you brought up the parable of the wheat and the tares, let's talk about it, since it appears that you don't understand it.
I didn't get passed the first sentence because of your arrogance, judging attitude and pride in yourself. Do you really expect me to take insults and give you credibility? Sorry, that's not how it works. If you decide to settle down and fly right, then we can talk.

Matt 13:38
The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one.

So don't tell me I don't understand it.
You are handling it right. You know they can't have the spirit with them when they insult you with saying it appears you don't understand it. It is best to stop reading that nonsense. I have yet to read something of worth from any of the posters who post like that.
I'm with you. :)

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 7:45 am
by drtanner
To circle back, There is a much easier way to all of this, aka getting your own witness that President Nelson is a prophet.

I’m have done that am at peace with the answer even in spite of all the criticism and news out there. (Which won’t stop but only increase) Peace is one of the feelings that can not be duplicated by the adversary.

I don’t get a sense of peace from the others posting here who are antagonists of President Nelson, in fact just the opposite. That is another witness in and of itself.

You have people on this forum all claiming the Holy Ghost communicated to them that the church is corrupt, that x,y,or,z is a prophet, that polygamy never happened, that a last days servant Is x,y,or z and many other claims. Well someone is wrong, someone is either lying or does not understand the Holy Ghost. Hint When you receive a witness it does not come with feelings of anger, resentment, or malice. It is a peace that passeth understanding and from my experience requires action, sincerity, and real intent to receive.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 8:19 am
by John Tavner
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 7:45 am To circle back, There is a much easier way to all of this, aka getting your own witness that President Nelson is a prophet.

I’m have done that am at peace with the answer even in spite of all the criticism and news out there. (Which won’t stop but only increase) Peace is one of the feelings that can not be duplicated by the adversary.

I don’t get a sense of peace from the others posting here who are antagonists of President Nelson, in fact just the opposite. That is another witness in and of itself.

You have people on this forum all claiming the Holy Ghost communicated to them that the church is corrupt, that x,y,or,z is a prophet, that polygamy never happened, that a David Is x,y,or z and many other claims. Well someone is wrong, someone is either lying or does not understand the Holy Ghost. Hint When you receive a witness it does not come with feelings of anger, resentment, or malice. It is a peace that passeth understanding and from my experience requires action, sincerity, and real intent to receive.
Perhaps the frustration comes with others not listening - wrong to be sure-, but it doesn't mean their witness was incorrect. Just because someone evinces a feeling of anger or frustration - and I bet you have done it yourself- does not mean their witness was wrong. Satan likes to work against us at all moments. For instance I received a witness about Pres. Nelson - the same as yours, but different as well. The difference came in how I asked the question. Questions mean a lot, they also can effect answers from God. If you can't see that there is corruption in the church, that is on you. Sure, you can cast stones and say "I'm filled with the devil" i.e. lying or "don't understand the SPirit" A thing people seem to forget is that the "feelings" are merely a representation of the Spirit - the Spirit is to come WITH POWER. It is faulty logic to think that one can receive a true witness of something and then NOT feel anger or resentment. Why? Because Satan works in your hearts and minds and tries to cause people to feel those bad things - even if a witness is true. I can feel an immense amount of peace about something and then logic starts to take over a day later and I get angry because I feel like I was betrayed. The problem in this scenario is me - if I have that view it is because I'm not going back to God and letting HIm work in my life, I'm make ME more important than God and what was revealed.

One of hte biggest struggles in the church is a mass misunderstanding of Galatians. We no longer read the books as letters - as they were intended- but as separate chapters which can hide meaning and context. So I can communicate that I have received a witness that there is corruption - which I have and I am-, but I prefer to witness more on Christ. He is the way, the truth, and the life. I'm sure people said the same thing about Jesus when He called people hypocrites or "vipers." They would say something like "well I don't get a sense of peace from that." You shouldn't be looking for a "sense of peace" but rather looking to "be in a state of peace." I can tell you that I believe whole-heartedly Joseph didn't practice polygamy - because the Spirit witnessed with POWER to me that He didn't. That being said, I always try to maintain the attitude of a little child and am willing to be corrected. After I've learned many of these things I've drawn closer to the Lord. My state of being is more at peace, I feel greater love toward teh Lord. I mean literally sometiems my prayers are Just"thankyou Lord, You are awesome." I am that grateful for His grace and mercy. He is my God. I'm constantly looking for what other "gods" are before Him. When I find it out, God usually tests me. He wants me to choose Him, or tradition and culture. Usually I choose HIm. If I fail once or twice, I think God for HIs forgiveness and am grateful for His mercy and thank HIm for changing me, because the moment I receive forgiveness from HIm, I am not hte same person I was who made the mistake. My past is gone, I am a new person in HIm. Immediately.

So I would be careful who you cast stones at. Years ago, I cast lots of stones and man I was having great spiritual experiences (same as now, but different). I believed exactly as you did. Made many of the same arguments. Defended voraciously the church, but with mostly kindness. I hinted others were tares and we were the wheat. Then the Lord showed me something and opened my eyes. It was something I couldn't unsee. I had put religion before God. I didn't know Christ. As I've sought HIm, I've come to know Him more and realize how merciful He really is. I've also found htat most of us do not know HIm. There are many who proclaim love that do not know HIm. There are many that proclaim works that do not Know HIm. Most people beleive what they are told to believe and do not seek Him themselves. They do not search the scriptures. THey do not spend time in the secret place speaking wiht Him. Prayers are rote, scripture reading is rote - it is to teach rather than to learn who God is, if they do read. I say this as someone who did all this. Now I realize the Lord works in His own timing. Things that I though false 5 years ago, I believe whole-heartedly today. Things I believe true, I realize are false today. What I want is for people to come unto Christ. THat is my desire. They can only do that by learning from God Himself. The Gospels teach it, Paul says Christ entered the Holy of Holies for Us, to show Us that now we could, by taking upon oujrself His name enter the HOly of HOlies and speak to God Himself. We no longer needed someone to be our intermediary, because Christ the Great High Priest is that intermediary. Yes, there are a apostles, prophets, and teachers etc... but they are to teach faith, of how one can come to Christ themselves, to believe so they can know the Father which is to obtain eternal life. We are teh temple if we but see it and accep the fact taht when we receive the Gift of the HOly Ghost, we are made holy or made "saints." Ones who are sanctified i.e Holy. Do we believe it? Do we know God enough to beleive it? If we don't then these are those in the last days to whom the Lord says "Ye never knew me" "Depart ye workers of iniquity" and they proclaim but we cast out devils in thy name, we did many might works! Why? They never knew God. They preached and taught a God that is only accessible by works and not a God that is received by believe and grace. By Belief we are justified. Again, Works come because we are made righteous - they are the "fruits" of righteousness, but not righteousness themselves. Only Christ makes us Righteous. Amen.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 8:26 am
by drtanner
John Tavner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 8:19 am
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 7:45 am To circle back, There is a much easier way to all of this, aka getting your own witness that President Nelson is a prophet.

I’m have done that am at peace with the answer even in spite of all the criticism and news out there. (Which won’t stop but only increase) Peace is one of the feelings that can not be duplicated by the adversary.

I don’t get a sense of peace from the others posting here who are antagonists of President Nelson, in fact just the opposite. That is another witness in and of itself.

You have people on this forum all claiming the Holy Ghost communicated to them that the church is corrupt, that x,y,or,z is a prophet, that polygamy never happened, that a David Is x,y,or z and many other claims. Well someone is wrong, someone is either lying or does not understand the Holy Ghost. Hint When you receive a witness it does not come with feelings of anger, resentment, or malice. It is a peace that passeth understanding and from my experience requires action, sincerity, and real intent to receive.
Perhaps the frustration comes with others not listening - wrong to be sure-, but it doesn't mean their witness was incorrect. Just because someone evinces a feeling of anger or frustration - and I bet you have done it yourself- does not mean their witness was wrong. Satan likes to work against us at all moments. For instance I received a witness about Pres. Nelson - the same as yours, but different as well. The difference came in how I asked the question. Questions mean a lot, they also can effect answers from God. If you can't see that there is corruption in the church, that is on you. Sure, you can cast stones and say "I'm filled with the devil" i.e. lying or "don't understand the SPirit" A thing people seem to forget is that the "feelings" are merely a representation of the Spirit - the Spirit is to come WITH POWER. It is faulty logic to think that one can receive a true witness of something and then NOT feel anger or resentment. Why? Because Satan works in your hearts and minds and tries to cause people to feel those bad things - even if a witness is true. I can feel an immense amount of peace about something and then logic starts to take over a day later and I get angry because I feel like I was betrayed. The problem in this scenario is me - if I have that view it is because I'm not going back to God and letting HIm work in my life, I'm make ME more important than God and what was revealed.

One of hte biggest struggles in the church is a mass misunderstanding of Galatians. We no longer read the books as letters - as they were intended- but as separate chapters which can hide meaning and context. So I can communicate that I have received a witness that there is corruption - which I have and I am-, but I prefer to witness more on Christ. He is the way, the truth, and the life. I'm sure people said the same thing about Jesus when He called people hypocrites or "vipers." They would say something like "well I don't get a sense of peace from that." You shouldn't be looking for a "sense of peace" but rather looking to "be in a state of peace." I can tell you that I believe whole-heartedly Joseph didn't practice polygamy - because the Spirit witnessed with POWER to me that He didn't. That being said, I always try to maintain the attitude of a little child and am willing to be corrected. After I've learned many of these things I've drawn closer to the Lord. My state of being is more at peace, I feel greater love toward teh Lord. I mean literally sometiems my prayers are Just"thankyou Lord, You are awesome." I am that grateful for His grace and mercy. He is my God. I'm constantly looking for what other "gods" are before Him. When I find it out, God usually tests me. He wants me to choose Him, or tradition and culture. Usually I choose HIm. If I fail once or twice, I think God for HIs forgiveness and am grateful for His mercy and thank HIm for changing me, because the moment I receive forgiveness from HIm, I am not hte same person I was who made the mistake. My past is gone, I am a new person in HIm. Immediately.

So I would be careful who you cast stones at. Years ago, I cast lots of stones and man I was having great spiritual experiences (same as now, but different). I believed exactly as you did. Made many of the same arguments. Defended voraciously the church, but with mostly kindness. I hinted others were tares and we were the wheat. Then the Lord showed me something and opened my eyes. It was something I couldn't unsee. I had put religion before God. I didn't know Christ. As I've sought HIm, I've come to know Him more and realize how merciful He really is. I've also found htat most of us do not know HIm. There are many who proclaim love that do not know HIm. There are many that proclaim works that do not Know HIm. Most people beleive what they are told to believe and do not seek Him themselves. They do not search the scriptures. THey do not spend time in the secret place speaking wiht Him. Prayers are rote, scripture reading is rote - it is to teach rather than to learn who God is, if they do read. I say this as someone who did all this. Now I realize the Lord works in His own timing. Things that I though false 5 years ago, I believe whole-heartedly today. Things I believe true, I realize are false today. What I want is for people to come unto Christ. THat is my desire. They can only do that by learning from God Himself. The Gospels teach it, Paul says Christ entered the Holy of Holies for Us, to show Us that now we could, by taking upon oujrself His name enter the HOly of HOlies and speak to God Himself. We no longer needed someone to be our intermediary, because Christ the Great High Priest is that intermediary. Yes, there are a apostles, prophets, and teachers etc... but they are to teach faith, of how one can come to Christ themselves, to believe so they can know the Father which is to obtain eternal life. We are teh temple if we but see it and accep the fact taht when we receive the Gift of the HOly Ghost, we are made holy or made "saints." Ones who are sanctified i.e Holy. Do we believe it? Do we know God enough to beleive it? If we don't then these are those in the last days to whom the Lord says "Ye never knew me" "Depart ye workers of iniquity" and they proclaim but we cast out devils in thy name, we did many might works! Why? They never knew God. They preached and taught a God that is only accessible by works and not a God that is received by believe and grace. By Belief we are justified. Again, Works come because we are made righteous - they are the "fruits" of righteousness, but not righteousness themselves. Only Christ makes us Righteous. Amen.
We agree on Christ.

As far as president Nelson as a prophet If you feel like you have a witness you can’t deny, I’m not trying to take away from that, that witness is yours to do what you will with it.

What I will say is those posting that say they have had a witness but spend there time bashing on the church really have not had a witness. That is not how the Lord spends his time.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 9:56 am
by John Tavner
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 8:26 am
John Tavner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 8:19 am
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 7:45 am To circle back, There is a much easier way to all of this, aka getting your own witness that President Nelson is a prophet.

I’m have done that am at peace with the answer even in spite of all the criticism and news out there. (Which won’t stop but only increase) Peace is one of the feelings that can not be duplicated by the adversary.

I don’t get a sense of peace from the others posting here who are antagonists of President Nelson, in fact just the opposite. That is another witness in and of itself.

You have people on this forum all claiming the Holy Ghost communicated to them that the church is corrupt, that x,y,or,z is a prophet, that polygamy never happened, that a David Is x,y,or z and many other claims. Well someone is wrong, someone is either lying or does not understand the Holy Ghost. Hint When you receive a witness it does not come with feelings of anger, resentment, or malice. It is a peace that passeth understanding and from my experience requires action, sincerity, and real intent to receive.
Perhaps the frustration comes with others not listening - wrong to be sure-, but it doesn't mean their witness was incorrect. Just because someone evinces a feeling of anger or frustration - and I bet you have done it yourself- does not mean their witness was wrong. Satan likes to work against us at all moments. For instance I received a witness about Pres. Nelson - the same as yours, but different as well. The difference came in how I asked the question. Questions mean a lot, they also can effect answers from God. If you can't see that there is corruption in the church, that is on you. Sure, you can cast stones and say "I'm filled with the devil" i.e. lying or "don't understand the SPirit" A thing people seem to forget is that the "feelings" are merely a representation of the Spirit - the Spirit is to come WITH POWER. It is faulty logic to think that one can receive a true witness of something and then NOT feel anger or resentment. Why? Because Satan works in your hearts and minds and tries to cause people to feel those bad things - even if a witness is true. I can feel an immense amount of peace about something and then logic starts to take over a day later and I get angry because I feel like I was betrayed. The problem in this scenario is me - if I have that view it is because I'm not going back to God and letting HIm work in my life, I'm make ME more important than God and what was revealed.

One of hte biggest struggles in the church is a mass misunderstanding of Galatians. We no longer read the books as letters - as they were intended- but as separate chapters which can hide meaning and context. So I can communicate that I have received a witness that there is corruption - which I have and I am-, but I prefer to witness more on Christ. He is the way, the truth, and the life. I'm sure people said the same thing about Jesus when He called people hypocrites or "vipers." They would say something like "well I don't get a sense of peace from that." You shouldn't be looking for a "sense of peace" but rather looking to "be in a state of peace." I can tell you that I believe whole-heartedly Joseph didn't practice polygamy - because the Spirit witnessed with POWER to me that He didn't. That being said, I always try to maintain the attitude of a little child and am willing to be corrected. After I've learned many of these things I've drawn closer to the Lord. My state of being is more at peace, I feel greater love toward teh Lord. I mean literally sometiems my prayers are Just"thankyou Lord, You are awesome." I am that grateful for His grace and mercy. He is my God. I'm constantly looking for what other "gods" are before Him. When I find it out, God usually tests me. He wants me to choose Him, or tradition and culture. Usually I choose HIm. If I fail once or twice, I think God for HIs forgiveness and am grateful for His mercy and thank HIm for changing me, because the moment I receive forgiveness from HIm, I am not hte same person I was who made the mistake. My past is gone, I am a new person in HIm. Immediately.

So I would be careful who you cast stones at. Years ago, I cast lots of stones and man I was having great spiritual experiences (same as now, but different). I believed exactly as you did. Made many of the same arguments. Defended voraciously the church, but with mostly kindness. I hinted others were tares and we were the wheat. Then the Lord showed me something and opened my eyes. It was something I couldn't unsee. I had put religion before God. I didn't know Christ. As I've sought HIm, I've come to know Him more and realize how merciful He really is. I've also found htat most of us do not know HIm. There are many who proclaim love that do not know HIm. There are many that proclaim works that do not Know HIm. Most people beleive what they are told to believe and do not seek Him themselves. They do not search the scriptures. THey do not spend time in the secret place speaking wiht Him. Prayers are rote, scripture reading is rote - it is to teach rather than to learn who God is, if they do read. I say this as someone who did all this. Now I realize the Lord works in His own timing. Things that I though false 5 years ago, I believe whole-heartedly today. Things I believe true, I realize are false today. What I want is for people to come unto Christ. THat is my desire. They can only do that by learning from God Himself. The Gospels teach it, Paul says Christ entered the Holy of Holies for Us, to show Us that now we could, by taking upon oujrself His name enter the HOly of HOlies and speak to God Himself. We no longer needed someone to be our intermediary, because Christ the Great High Priest is that intermediary. Yes, there are a apostles, prophets, and teachers etc... but they are to teach faith, of how one can come to Christ themselves, to believe so they can know the Father which is to obtain eternal life. We are teh temple if we but see it and accep the fact taht when we receive the Gift of the HOly Ghost, we are made holy or made "saints." Ones who are sanctified i.e Holy. Do we believe it? Do we know God enough to beleive it? If we don't then these are those in the last days to whom the Lord says "Ye never knew me" "Depart ye workers of iniquity" and they proclaim but we cast out devils in thy name, we did many might works! Why? They never knew God. They preached and taught a God that is only accessible by works and not a God that is received by believe and grace. By Belief we are justified. Again, Works come because we are made righteous - they are the "fruits" of righteousness, but not righteousness themselves. Only Christ makes us Righteous. Amen.
We agree on Christ.

As far as president Nelson as a prophet If you feel like you have a witness you can’t deny, I’m not trying to take away from that, that witness is yours to do what you will with it.

What I will say is those posting that say they have had a witness but spend there time bashing on the church really have not had a witness. That is not how the Lord spends his time.
It makes me happy that we agree on Christ :)

To be clear, I'm not defending my witness at all, I don't need to, I don't feel threatened by an opposing "witness". I don't even like to "witness" it because I prefer people to come to their own conclusions and ask God themselves. Each person is at a different stage and it is a hard thing to even let go of or be willing to let go of tradition. If the Lord inspires me to share I will, but for the most part this is only the 2nd or 3rd time since my answer I have stated as such and it has been about a year since I received my answer. This was more to defend those who don't know how to express their emotions well - which turns out to be a lot of us.

Satan is constantly stirring up the hearts of those around us to anger. He can use truth to cause anger. Logically, one can have a witness from God that homosexuality or even fornication is evil and then bash it continually and be angry and frustrated about it. How they bash and attack it might not be from God, even though their witness it was a sin or wrong came from God. I will say, that if they spend more time bashing on the church rather than preaching come to Christ I believe they are wrong - just like I think those that are spending more time defending the church rather than preaching coming to Christ are wrong.

Regardless, what I'm sure we can agree on is 1) Christ (like before) and 2) that those who set out to stir up contention are not inspired of God, but by Satan in that action - whatever their previous witness may be, whether from God or another source.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 10:29 am
by righteousrepublic
Then there are those that claim to have had a witness or revelation that would like it if we thought they were a prophet. Well, the Lord doesn't work that way either.
If God wants the body of the church to know something he'll reveal it to the Prophet first, not some guy that seeks anonymity on the internet giving others an impression, like some school kid, that they know something the rest don't know.
Russell M Nelson is a prophet, seer and revelator. He is in place for when God wants to say something. He is there to urge the members to keep the commandments, covenants and manners.

Here is what we're taught to do upon people telling us the scriptures teach anything but what they do teach. Or that the Prophet isn't a Prophet, or the leaders have gone astray, there was a better way for this, that or other depending on the topic.

But let's see what God has to say about such activities.

Romans 16:17
17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark (beware of) them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.

Acts 20:28-30
28 ¶ Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.
29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 10:38 am
by righteousrepublic
John Tavner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 9:56 amjust like I think those that are spending more time defending the church rather than preaching coming to Christ are wrong.

Regardless, what I'm sure we can agree on is 1) Christ (like before) and 2) that those who set out to stir up contention are not inspired of God, but by Satan in that action - whatever their previous witness may be, whether from God or another source.
Here's one for ya. Are we to believe IN Christ or BELIEVE Christ, and what is the difference?

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 10:54 am
by drtanner
Defending Christ’s church and who he has called to lead is preaching- come unto Christ.

No where else will you find his authorized ordinances but in his church, keys of which are held by those he has called. Most Everything else in opposition to this is an attempt to discredit the opportunity for the qualifications for the power of Godliness to be manifest, the other half of those qualifications must come from individual hearts.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 10:58 am
by nightlight
righteousrepublic wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:10 am
Matthias wrote: December 21st, 2019, 11:13 pmSince you brought up the parable of the wheat and the tares, let's talk about it, since it appears that you don't understand it.
I didn't get passed the first sentence because of your arrogance, judging attitude and pride in yourself. Do you really expect me to take insults and give you credibility? Sorry, that's not how it works. If you decide to settle down and fly right, then we can talk.

Matt 13:38
The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one.

So don't tell me I don't understand it.
Lol give me a break....your own posts condemn you.

Someone telling that they think you dont understand something IS NOT AN INSULT BUT TO YOUR PRIDE.

If this is the case....please apologize right now to Alaris... and everyone else who you claim don't understand the scriptures.

You are weaking all your positions with this display of pride. I suffer from pride when I'm told I don't understand things too...you're not alone. Let's grow together,brother.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 11:11 am
by John Tavner
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 10:54 am Defending Christ’s church and who he has called to lead is preaching- come unto Christ.

No where else will you find his authorized ordinances but in his church, keys of which are held by those he has called. Most Everything else in opposition to this is an attempt to discredit the opportunity for the qualifications for the power of Godliness to be manifest, the other half of those qualifications must come from individual hearts.
First I show you this Quote D&C 10 67-68. 67 Behold, this is my doctrine—whosoever repenteth and cometh unto me, the same is my church.

68 Whosoever declareth more or less than this, the same is not of me, but is against me; therefore he is not of my church.

This scripture tells us that coming unto Christ is different than what you are saying.


The church does not equate to Christ. Preaching to come unto Christ is to teach faith in Him, which is believing Him and believing in Him. When one begins to hope, they begin to believe they can be free through and in the name of Christ - they seek to come unto Christ i.e. through repentance - "Lord forgive me and make me a new man (or woman)." The first fruits of repentance is baptism. Baptism is a fruit of repentance, not the beginning of it. When one is seeking truth, they will find by the grace of God an authorized representative of that baptism. How does one receive authorization? From God HImself. It is NOT from man, it never was; for God will NOT give His power unto man in such a manner except by His authorization (2 Nephi 28:5 And they deny the power of God, the Holy One of Israel; and they say unto the people: Hearken unto us, and hear ye our precept; ... for the Lord and the Redeemer hath done his work, and he hath given his power unto men;.) Priesthood is the authority to act in God's name, the authority is given by God. Unless you have heard God's voice (or the Spirit's) telling you that you have authority to baptize, you probably shouldn't. Baptism happens and then if one has achieved a broken heart and contrite Spirit - they do this by realizing they can not do anything or save themselves through any works, but only by seeking God, by actually coming unto Him. NOTHING can save them but Christ. They seek His will in all things. This leads them to receiving the Gift of the Holy Ghost. Which gift is a calling and election whereby they are made saints and sons(or daughters) of the Most High God. If someone has also received authority FROM GOD to lay on hands for the Gift of the HOly Ghost, then the person will lay heads upon someone who has a broken heart and contrite spirit and the faith of hte one laying on of hands will help the individual believe and thus they will receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost being baptized with Fire and the Holy Ghost by the Son.

Mark it down now, teaching to Come unto Christ is not the same as teaching them to come to the church and be baptized. We only sow and water - the Lord brings the increase. The Lord will bring His children to Him. The only way to be a apart of His church is to repent and come unto Him - anyone who says or teaches otherwise is "against Him."

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 11:20 am
by LDS Watchman
righteousrepublic wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:10 am
Matthias wrote: December 21st, 2019, 11:13 pmSince you brought up the parable of the wheat and the tares, let's talk about it, since it appears that you don't understand it.
I didn't get passed the first sentence because of your arrogance, judging attitude and pride in yourself. Do you really expect me to take insults and give you credibility? Sorry, that's not how it works. If you decide to settle down and fly right, then we can talk.

Matt 13:38
The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one.

So don't tell me I don't understand it.
I'm not sure what response you were expecting, when you said:

"Tares are growing in number every day, and when they are ripe God will send his wrath upon them."

That certainly sounds like an accusation and threat that those of us who see the apostasy in the Church and keep pointing it out are tares (wicked) and will be destroyed.

If this is not what you meant by this comment, I apologize for taking it that way.

I suppose when I said that it appears that you do not understand the parable of the wheat and the tares it was a bit clunky. Perhaps I could have worded it better.

The point remains that if you think those of us who see the apostasy in the Church are the tares, you are wrong. D&C 86 tells us that the tares would choke out the wheat and drive the Church into the wilderness (apostasy).

Therefore those of us who recognize this cannot be the tares. Now that doesn't mean that just because I recognize the apostasy and you don't, that I I think I'm more righteous or that I'm smarter than you.

Not at all.

But I have given the state of the Church a great deal of thought, study, and prayer. I know that the Church is in apostasy.

Now that I have seen this, I can't unsee it. I can't put my head in the ground and pretend that I don't know what I know.

Scripture after scripture proves that the Church has been corrupted from top to bottom.

The parable of the wheat and the tares is one of the best examples of this.

Truth is what matters to me, not defending a Church that I know has fallen into apostasy. Nor do I care too much about sugar coating the truth so as not to offend, people such as yourself, who are apparently hellbent on defending the brethren and the Church no matter what they do or what the scriptures say.

If the fact that I keep pointing out what the scriptures say and comparing that to the state of the Church offends you, why not put me back on your foe list and ignore what I'm saying?

If you want to hurl accusations, such as referring to people as tares and speaking of their coming destruction for believing the scriptures and weighing the fruit of the brethren and the Church, then you need to be prepared to have people set you straight.

Having said that, I don't know that being awake to the apostasy makes me any more righteous or worthy to make the cut when the final restoration and gathering happens. If anything it brings further condemnation upon me if I don't change my ways and keep living the same way I did when I was blind and asleep.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 11:41 am
by nightlight
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 7:45 am To circle back, There is a much easier way to all of this, aka getting your own witness that President Nelson is a prophet.

I’m have done that am at peace with the answer even in spite of all the criticism and news out there. (Which won’t stop but only increase) Peace is one of the feelings that can not be duplicated by the adversary.

I don’t get a sense of peace from the others posting here who are antagonists of President Nelson, in fact just the opposite. That is another witness in and of itself.

You have people on this forum all claiming the Holy Ghost communicated to them that the church is corrupt, that x,y,or,z is a prophet, that polygamy never happened, that a last days servant Is x,y,or z and many other claims. Well someone is wrong, someone is either lying or does not understand the Holy Ghost. Hint When you receive a witness it does not come with feelings of anger, resentment, or malice. It is a peace that passeth understanding and from my experience requires action, sincerity, and real intent to receive.
you spend your time saying how God does or doesn't spend His time...how the Spirit wont/will make one feel. I urge caution, brother.

I agree Nelson is our prophet/High Priest....but that is where we part.
------------------
" "

"Well someone is wrong, someone is either lying or does not understand the Holy Ghost. Hint When you receive a witness it does not come with feelings of anger, resentment, or malice. It is a peace that passeth understanding and from my experience requires action, sincerity, and real intent to receive."
---------------

When the Holy Ghost Awakens us to Our Awful Situation................you realize our situation is awful

I blame Nelson the same way I blame my dad, the same way I blame my grandfather....the same way I blame ME.

We are as to Joseph Smith as the Jews were to Moses.....we refuse to live the LAW that was given to us. "We'll live this Law once we get back to the Promised Land / we'll live this Law once we get to Zion"
It's the same old song and dance

You guys can say "that wasn't for us, God told us to do it...but....He didn't actually mean right now".
You can pretend we do live it, as the Brethren do.
You can quote Nibley all the day long , but it won't change the plain as day scriptures...

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 11:45 am
by righteousrepublic
nightlight wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 10:58 am
righteousrepublic wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:10 am
Matthias wrote: December 21st, 2019, 11:13 pmSince you brought up the parable of the wheat and the tares, let's talk about it, since it appears that you don't understand it.
I didn't get passed the first sentence because of your arrogance, judging attitude and pride in yourself. Do you really expect me to take insults and give you credibility? Sorry, that's not how it works. If you decide to settle down and fly right, then we can talk.

Matt 13:38
The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one.

So don't tell me I don't understand it.
Lol give me a break....your own posts condemn you.

Someone telling that they think you dont understand something IS NOT AN INSULT BUT TO YOUR PRIDE.

If this is the case....please apologize right now to Alaris... and everyone else who you claim don't understand the scriptures.

You are weaking all your positions with this display of pride. I suffer from pride when I'm told I don't understand things too...you're not alone. Let's grow together,brother.
Are you :P ing me?

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 11:56 am
by LDS Watchman
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 8:26 am
...those posting that say they have had a witness but spend there time bashing on the church really have not had a witness. That is not how the Lord spends his time.
During his mortal ministry, the Lord spent a great deal of time telling the people about the false teachings and practices taught by the leaders of the day and warning them to steer clear. He didn't pull any punches when it came to exposing the hypocrisy of the leaders.

John the Baptist did the same, as did Christ's apostles, and the prophets in the scriptures like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Malachi, Lehi, etc.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 12:44 pm
by drtanner
Matthias wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 11:56 am
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 8:26 am
...those posting that say they have had a witness but spend there time bashing on the church really have not had a witness. That is not how the Lord spends his time.
During his mortal ministry, the Lord spent a great deal of time telling the people about the false teachings and practices taught by the leaders of the day and warning them to steer clear. He didn't pull any punches when it came to exposing the hypocrisy of the leaders.

John the Baptist did the same, as did Christ's apostles, and the prophets in the scriptures like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Malachi, Lehi, etc.
They didn’t spend there time bashing on themselves. They knew who called them and why they were called. The key is the witness.

They did however receive a lot of criticism from others. There is no difference here.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 1:08 pm
by LDS Watchman
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 12:44 pm
Matthias wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 11:56 am
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 8:26 am
...those posting that say they have had a witness but spend there time bashing on the church really have not had a witness. That is not how the Lord spends his time.
During his mortal ministry, the Lord spent a great deal of time telling the people about the false teachings and practices taught by the leaders of the day and warning them to steer clear. He didn't pull any punches when it came to exposing the hypocrisy of the leaders.

John the Baptist did the same, as did Christ's apostles, and the prophets in the scriptures like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Malachi, Lehi, etc.
They didn’t spend there time bashing on themselves. They knew who called them and why they were called. The key is the witness.

They did however receive a lot of criticism from others. There is no difference here.

You're argument doesn't make any sense.

If the leaders and the people are in apostasy, there's nothing wrong with pointing out their hypocrisy and the lack of prophetic fruits from those who are called to be our prophets.

There really is no comparison between the brethren today and the prophets and apostles in the scriptures.

There is however a pretty darn good comparison between the brethren today and the legitimate spiritual leaders of the Jews in Christ's day or the leaders of the people in the days of Isaiah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Malachi, Hosea, Lehi, etc.

You're acting a lot like Laman and Lemuel, who refused to believe that the Jews were wicked and therefore thought Lehi, Nephi, and the others were crazy or apostate or whatever.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 1:20 pm
by righteousrepublic
Matt 13
36 Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.
37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; Jesus
38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;
39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Doctrine and Covenants 101:65–67
65 Therefore, I must gather together my people, according to the parable of the wheat and the tares, that the wheat may be secured in the garners to possess eternal life, and be crowned with celestial glory, when I shall come in the kingdom of my Father to reward every man according as his work shall be;
66 While the tares shall be bound in bundles, and their bands made strong, that they may be burned with unquenchable fire.
67 Therefore, a commandment I give unto all the churches, that they shall continue to gather together unto the places which I have appointed.

D&C 86
1 Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you my servants, concerning the parable of the wheat and of the tares:
2 Behold, verily I say, the field was the world, and the apostles were the sowers of the seed;
3 And after they have fallen asleep (The apostles of Christ were all killed so the church had no leadership) the great persecutor of the church, the apostate, the whore, even Babylon, that maketh all nations to drink of her cup, in whose hearts the enemy, even Satan, sitteth to reign—behold he soweth the tares; wherefore, the tares choke the wheat and drive the church into the wilderness. See: D&C 33:5 below
4 But behold, in the last days, even now while the Lord is beginning to bring forth the word, and the blade is springing up and is yet tender—
5 Behold, verily I say unto you, the angels are crying unto the Lord day and night, who are ready and waiting to be sent forth to reap down the fields;
6 But the Lord saith unto them, pluck not up the tares while the blade is yet tender (for verily your faith is weak), lest you destroy the wheat also.
7 Therefore, let the wheat and the tares grow together until the harvest is fully ripe; then ye shall first gather out the wheat from among the tares, and after the gathering of the wheat, behold and lo, the tares are bound in bundles, and the field remaineth to be burned.

D&C 33:5
5 And verily, verily, I say unto you, that this church have I established and called forth out of the wilderness.


The church is out of the wilderness having been restored through Joseph Smith.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 1:44 pm
by righteousrepublic
Personal apostasy

1 Nephi 12:17
17 And the mists of darkness are the temptations of the devil, which blindeth the eyes, and hardeneth the hearts of the children of men, and leadeth them away into broad roads, that they perish and are lost.

Helaman 3:33–34
33 And in the fifty and first year of the reign of the judges there was peace also, save it were the pride which began to enter into the church—not into the church of God, but into the hearts of the people who professed to belong to the church of God—
34 And they were lifted up in pride, even to the persecution of many of their brethren. Now this was a great evil, which did cause the more humble part of the people to suffer great persecutions, and to wade through much affliction.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 2:36 pm
by drtanner
Matthias wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:08 pm
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 12:44 pm
Matthias wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 11:56 am
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 8:26 am
...those posting that say they have had a witness but spend there time bashing on the church really have not had a witness. That is not how the Lord spends his time.
During his mortal ministry, the Lord spent a great deal of time telling the people about the false teachings and practices taught by the leaders of the day and warning them to steer clear. He didn't pull any punches when it came to exposing the hypocrisy of the leaders.

John the Baptist did the same, as did Christ's apostles, and the prophets in the scriptures like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Malachi, Lehi, etc.
They didn’t spend there time bashing on themselves. They knew who called them and why they were called. The key is the witness.

They did however receive a lot of criticism from others. There is no difference here.

You're argument doesn't make any sense.

If the leaders and the people are in apostasy, there's nothing wrong with pointing out their hypocrisy and the lack of prophetic fruits from those who are called to be our prophets.

There really is no comparison between the brethren today and the prophets and apostles in the scriptures.

There is however a pretty darn good comparison between the brethren today and the legitimate spiritual leaders of the Jews in Christ's day or the leaders of the people in the days of Isaiah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Malachi, Hosea, Lehi, etc.

You're acting a lot like Laman and Lemuel, who refused to believe that the Jews were wicked and therefore thought Lehi, Nephi, and the others were crazy or apostate or whatever.
No, you don’t Seem understand the fact that I already have an answer I can’t / won’t deny. If you claimed you had an answer I would respect that and leave you to do as much good as possible with that answer.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 3:11 pm
by LDS Watchman
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 2:36 pm
Matthias wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 1:08 pm
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 12:44 pm
Matthias wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 11:56 am

During his mortal ministry, the Lord spent a great deal of time telling the people about the false teachings and practices taught by the leaders of the day and warning them to steer clear. He didn't pull any punches when it came to exposing the hypocrisy of the leaders.

John the Baptist did the same, as did Christ's apostles, and the prophets in the scriptures like Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Hosea, Malachi, Lehi, etc.
They didn’t spend there time bashing on themselves. They knew who called them and why they were called. The key is the witness.

They did however receive a lot of criticism from others. There is no difference here.

You're argument doesn't make any sense.

If the leaders and the people are in apostasy, there's nothing wrong with pointing out their hypocrisy and the lack of prophetic fruits from those who are called to be our prophets.

There really is no comparison between the brethren today and the prophets and apostles in the scriptures.

There is however a pretty darn good comparison between the brethren today and the legitimate spiritual leaders of the Jews in Christ's day or the leaders of the people in the days of Isaiah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Malachi, Hosea, Lehi, etc.

You're acting a lot like Laman and Lemuel, who refused to believe that the Jews were wicked and therefore thought Lehi, Nephi, and the others were crazy or apostate or whatever.
No, you don’t Seem understand the fact that I already have an answer I can’t / won’t deny. If you claimed you had an answer I would respect that and leave you to do as much good as possible with that answer.
I have also received an answer, and that answer is that the Church has become corrupted from top to bottom.

I will not deny the answer I received either.

I am trying my best to do as much good as I can with that answer and to follow the path God has for me

I respect that you are doing your best to follow what you believe is right. If you believe that the Church has remained pure and Holy, is on the right track, and is led by true prophets and apostles in the fullest sense, then by all means you should follow that.

I wish you well.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 9:26 pm
by drtanner
Elder Maxwell:

Some insist upon studying the Church only through the eyes of its defectors--like interviewing Judas to understand Jesus. Defectors always tell us more about themselves than about that from which they have departed.

Church Members will live in this wheat-and-tares situation until the Millennium. Some real tares even masquerade as wheat, including a few eager individuals who lecture the rest of us about the Church doctrines in which they no longer believe. They criticize the use of Church resources to which they no longer contribute. They condescendingly seek to counsel the Brethren whom they no longer sustain. Confrontive, except of themselves of course, they leave the Church, but they cannot leave the Church alone
(Ensign, Becometh As a Child)

The critics of the Church, who are often those within the Church, frequently say, "Why doesn't the Church do this or that?" or "Why does the Church do this or that?" Those who desire to make the greatest demands of the Church are usually those who make the fewest demands of themselves in terms of their discipleship.
(Wherefore, Ye Must Press Forward, 69.)

Church ... leaders are cruelly caricatured by some in the world. For perspective, imagine how television's six o'clock news would have protrayed Noah as he worked on his ark day by day. Besides, attention from the adversary is merely a cruel form of commendation, if we can but stand the "praise." There is such a thing as being praised with faint damns.
(Ensign, The Net Gatherers of Every Kind)

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 9:57 pm
by nightlight
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 9:26 pm Elder Maxwell:

Some insist upon studying the Church only through the eyes of its defectors--like interviewing Judas to understand Jesus. Defectors always tell us more about themselves than about that from which they have departed.

Church Members will live in this wheat-and-tares situation until the Millennium. Some real tares even masquerade as wheat, including a few eager individuals who lecture the rest of us about the Church doctrines in which they no longer believe. They criticize the use of Church resources to which they no longer contribute. They condescendingly seek to counsel the Brethren whom they no longer sustain. Confrontive, except of themselves of course, they leave the Church, but they cannot leave the Church alone
(Ensign, Becometh As a Child)

The critics of the Church, who are often those within the Church, frequently say, "Why doesn't the Church do this or that?" or "Why does the Church do this or that?" Those who desire to make the greatest demands of the Church are usually those who make the fewest demands of themselves in terms of their discipleship.
(Wherefore, Ye Must Press Forward, 69.)

Church ... leaders are cruelly caricatured by some in the world. For perspective, imagine how television's six o'clock news would have protrayed Noah as he worked on his ark day by day. Besides, attention from the adversary is merely a cruel form of commendation, if we can but stand the "praise." There is such a thing as being praised with faint damns.
(Ensign, The Net Gatherers of Every Kind)
"Church Members will live in this wheat-and-tares situation until the Millennium"

False doctrine.... the Millennium starts once the earth recives it Glory and after the First Resurrection.
Before that happens.....America will have been cleansed, Enochs city returned, 10 Lost Tribes established , etc....all before the Millennium.

Zion Cometh before He comes in Glory. The tares will be torn by then....or am I reading our scriptures wrong?

There is reason why mainstream Mormons don't know this.
It's the same reason why we don't speak/teach of casting out of unclean spirits.

Shhhhh...let us not speak of these massive elephants breaking our couches....people are trying to get sum sleep.

Re: What evidence is there that Russell M. Nelson is a true prophet, seer, and revelator?

Posted: December 22nd, 2019, 10:07 pm
by Connie561
nightlight wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 9:57 pm
drtanner wrote: December 22nd, 2019, 9:26 pm Elder Maxwell:

Some insist upon studying the Church only through the eyes of its defectors--like interviewing Judas to understand Jesus. Defectors always tell us more about themselves than about that from which they have departed.

Church Members will live in this wheat-and-tares situation until the Millennium. Some real tares even masquerade as wheat, including a few eager individuals who lecture the rest of us about the Church doctrines in which they no longer believe. They criticize the use of Church resources to which they no longer contribute. They condescendingly seek to counsel the Brethren whom they no longer sustain. Confrontive, except of themselves of course, they leave the Church, but they cannot leave the Church alone
(Ensign, Becometh As a Child)

The critics of the Church, who are often those within the Church, frequently say, "Why doesn't the Church do this or that?" or "Why does the Church do this or that?" Those who desire to make the greatest demands of the Church are usually those who make the fewest demands of themselves in terms of their discipleship.
(Wherefore, Ye Must Press Forward, 69.)

Church ... leaders are cruelly caricatured by some in the world. For perspective, imagine how television's six o'clock news would have protrayed Noah as he worked on his ark day by day. Besides, attention from the adversary is merely a cruel form of commendation, if we can but stand the "praise." There is such a thing as being praised with faint damns.
(Ensign, The Net Gatherers of Every Kind)
"Church Members will live in this wheat-and-tares situation until the Millennium"

False doctrine.... the Millennium starts once the earth recives it Glory and after the First Resurrection.
Before that happens.....America will have been cleansed, Enochs city returned, 10 Lost Tribes established , etc....all before the Millennium.

Zion Cometh before He comes in Glory. The tares will be torn by then....or am I reading our scriptures wrong?

There is reason why mainstream Mormons don't know this.
It's the same reason why we don't speak/teach of casting out of unclean spirits.

Shhhhh...let us not speak of these massive elephants breaking our couches....people are trying to get sum sleep.
I read your post and you wrote false doctrine. Is it the quotes that are false doctrine or what you wrote after the words false doctrine that is false doctrine?