Christian Origins?

For discussing the Church, Gospel of Jesus Christ, Mormonism, etc.
Post Reply
heliocentr1c
captain of 100
Posts: 905

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by heliocentr1c »

mac wrote: November 9th, 2020, 4:29 pm
gjwd84115 wrote: November 9th, 2020, 11:51 am Yea, I don't trust them either:

Verse 1 The apostle John sees a vision in which the sea, representing peoples, multitudes, nations and tongues (see Rev. 17:15) form the
Roman Empire. The seven heads refer to the kingdoms prior to Rome as well as the Roman Empire itself (as a result), and the horns represent the countries that came out of the Roman Empire. The crowns refer to ten countries that will come out of the Roman Empire later which are monarchies. It is in the day of these kings that the church and the kingdom of God is restored (see Daniel 2:44). Obviously, these "heads" have committed much blasphemy.

Verse 2 The characteristics of of this "beast" is depicted as similiar to the three kingdoms before it (see Daniel 7:1-7). The dragon, or satan (see Rev. 12: 3-4) gives this empire and its rulers their power, seat, and authority.

Verse 3 One of the heads (Rome itself) receives an apparent mortal wound, but the deadly wound was helaled, or in other words, the Roman rule was revived through the Catholic church at which the world wonders or marvels at.

Verse 4 And they (much of the world) worship the dragon, or satan, unknowingly, of course (see 1 Nephi 14:10), and they say; who can contend against this empire.

Verse 5 This revived Roman Empire, or Catholic church, is given a mouth, or in other words a leader who speaks for it. This leader is ther Bishop of Rome, or pope, who has through the years stated many great (bold) things as well as many blasphemies consisting of many untruths about God, heaven, and the true gospel. The 42 month period mentioned is a prophetic time period in which each day represents one year (see Clark's Commentary). There is a misunderstanding concerning this time period as many falsely interpret this as a literal time period when it is not. Therfore, this time period is 1260 years (from 570 AD to1830 AD when the true church of Jesus Chrit was "driven in the wildernes" of obscurity with no public ministry). (see also Rev. 12:6 and the JST Rev. 12:5)

Verse 6 The blasphemy is described further.

Verse 7 This verse tells of the great apostate church's war against the saints, it's temporary victory, and it's great dominion.

Verse 8 All those who belong to this corrupt church or any other false religion can not be written in the Lamb's Book of Life as long as they belong to such. (see 1 Nephi 14:10, 1 Nephi 13: 26, and Alma 5:58).

Verse 9 This verse admonishes all to open their ears to hear the whisperings of the Spirit of God.

Verse 10 This is a warning to all those who oppress. It is estimated that during the dark and middle ages 50, 000, 000 were put to death by this wicked empire, and this does not include the many saints who were martyred by the Roman Empire during the days of the original apostles and shortly thereafter. John closes this verse by mentioning the patience and faith of the saints.

Verse 11 John sees another beast (or kingdom) coming out of the earth which represents the Catholic church. The two horns represent the Roman and Greek branches of this church and they are dipicted as like a lamb (seemingly Christlike), however, it speaks as a dragon, meaning that it speaks deceitfully as satan would.

Verse 12 The beast is said to exercise all the power of the beast (or kingdom) before it. In other words, it now exercises the power that the Roman Empire had before. The last part of this verse means that the people worship this Empire, the one that satan set up. It just has a new more popular face.

Verse 13 This verse refers to the false miracles which satan has employed through this church.

Verse 14 These false miracles deceive many on earth in the sight of the beast, or, in other words, wherever this beast or kingdom exists. The "image" or likeness means that the papacy would rule just as the emperors did before, only now they would appear more Christlike.

Verse 15 "And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast," refers to satan, through the emperor Constantine, giving his "seat" to the bishop of Rome. The emperor Constantine placed the bishop of Rome over all other bishops which began the papacy. This verse goes on to state that those who opposed this false form of worship were put to death.

Verse 16 There is also a mistake here in the translation which has led to much confusion and much speculation and false doctrine. The Greek preposition en (transliteration) can mean in, on, at, by, and with, and it was mistakenly translated as "in" when it should have been translated as "with." There are also other problems with the translation of this verse, but it is referriing to accepting (receives) this mark with the right hand and forehead, which is a mark or a sign of this kingdom. It is what is commonly known as the sign of the cross (see reference under "Sign of the Cross" in "Mormon Doctrine"). Constantine claimed to have seen a vision of Christ along with a bright cross in the sky, and he was instructed to follow that mark and conquer. However, I don't believe that it was Christ whom he saw. Anyhow, that is the mark or sign of both of those apostate empires, the Roman empire as well as the Catholic church.

Verse17 This verse simply refers to a practice done for a time during the inquisition. The phrase "name of the beast" is referring to a person being a Catholic. The phrase "number of his name" refers to a persons allegiance to the papacy, of whom he following number refers to.

Vrese 18 The man referred to in this verse is the bishop of Rome, or the pope. An inscription on the mitre of the bishop of Rome read "DCLXV," or 666 in our numbers.

I hope that this was helpful. God bless you!

George Joseph DeMetz



't trust them either:



Though it is true that when the Gospel went amongst the gentiles of the west they in some instances added pagan doctrine, and also one must remember in those first few centuries Rome was not the centre nor ruler of the varied christian churches thru out the known world, there was many Christian centres that did not accept any Authority from Rome, both inside and outside of the Roman empire.
To be fair to them all as it is the continual habit of the Protestant movement to constantly demonise and generate bias propaganda about any other Christian church that is not part of them.
These earlier Christian assemblies wether it be Rome, Alexandria, Antioch, etc, always held true to the most essential, yes even the most precious saving truth of the Gospel, that is that Jesus of Nazerath is the Messiah, the Son of God, that He was born of a virgin, was sacrificed apon the cross of calvary for the sins of the world and that after three days in the tomb arose from the dead.
They also kept the most precious accounts of Him most sacred, ie the Gospels of the Apostles, etc.
Rome was never in control of christianity, save it be in some portions of the west. Nor could it of been the abominable church, the Anti christ, nor could the eastern churches be either, for not one denied the divinity or Sacrifice or ressurection of Christ, which are the essential teachings to bring about a mans redemption.
However in the seventh century there arose a prophet whom taught that Jesus was not Gods son, that He did not suffer and die apon the cross, that he was only one of the prophets.
This new prophet claimed that he was the final prophet and the greatest of the prophets, that Jesus was subserviant to him.
He was given power to create a new religion, and thru violence and force it swept thru most of the christian countries, using the sword to force those christian lands to accept this new prophet as the Final Prophet or die.
Untold christian libraries, the most ancient and veritable christian centres were destroyed, their books, manuscripts burnt, like a plaque of devouring locusts the armies of this prophet came even to the doors of rome, took spain, sought even to invade france, all the faithfull and most ancient christian centres were destroyed, Alexandria, Antioch, the venerable armenian churchs, all along north africa the christian centres were laid waste, were no more.
Rome whom for all its failings still had the most precious truths preserved and the Lord seen fit to prevent the armies of the beast, and its anti christ prophet from taking Rome and the northern gentile countrys that held fast to faith in Jesus.
No pope of Rome ever denied the divinity, atonement or ressurection of Jesus, no Greek Arch bishop did either, neither did the remnants outside of the control of this prophet and his religion.
Only one major religion did which did indeed take control, not only of the holy land but nigh on every christian country in the east and all of north africa and some parts of europe.
This prophet and his religion is what the Apostles were talking about concerning the emergance of a man, the Anti christ, a false prophet whom would oppose all religions and set himself up in the seat of God..
As stated this prophet denied the divinity of Jesus, denied His sacrifice apon the cross and denied His ressurection. This prophet claimed that he himself was the Main prophet, that he was higher than Jesus, therefore he set himself up in the seat of God.
Even in jerusalem to this day apon temple mount sits this prophets church and inscribed on its outer walls is a denial that Jesus is Gods son..
That is the abomination of desolation set up in the temple mount of the true God as spoken of by the apostles and prophets of old.
This false prophet and his anti christ religion has held sway since the eigth/ninth centuries..
This is so over looked today by Christians of this latter times, but if one reads the scriptures concerning the false prophet, the beast, the anti christ, reads the apostles description of what an Anti Christ is and then read this false prophets words in his own book, you will discern for yourselves.
Be gratefull for the faithfull remnant of Christians in the gentile churches that held fast to the saving graces of the gospel, preserving what they could of the scriptures during the great slaughter and the destruction thats lasted nigh on 1200 years, were apon a great war, both spiritual and temporal has been waged apon the true Saints of God whom in their untold numbers died rather than give worship to the beast and the false prophet.
Whom preserved for mankind today the most precious of truths that Jesus is Lord, He is Gods Son, that he paid the price of sin on calvarys hill and after three days arose from the dead!
Neither the evil one and his sevants within christian churches or out of it, neither his armies thru the centuries could eradicate this simple message of salvation that we have today.The catholic church, the greek church, the ancient armenian church, the ancient ethioptian church, the protestant church for all their faults held fast to that most precious of saving truths.
Protecting us at the same time from the beast, the false prophet, the anti christ whom even to this very day holds great power in eastern lands.
They also kept the most precious accounts of Him most sacred, ie the Gospels of the Apostles, etc.
The ecumenical councils in the 300 and 400s A.D. that the Catholics and others point to for legitimacy of doctrine would suggest otherwise. Instead of allowing the word of God to speak for itself, they adopted creeds (in addition to or on top of the scriptures) which must be accepted as well as altering the scriptures to suit these creeds/doctrines in some cases.

No pope of Rome ever denied the divinity, atonement or ressurection of Jesus, no Greek Arch bishop did either, neither did the remnants outside of the control of this prophet and his religion.
You don’t have to deny the divinity of Christ to co-opt it’s perceived legitimacy or use it for something it was never intended for. It’s much more useful (and less work) to use it’s perceived authority as justification of one’s own agenda. The crusades and inquisitions are great examples of this.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

Israelites Killed Men, Women & Children = Apostasy & Discredits Judaism
How insane for God to command “Thou shalt not kill” & then pretend God commands killing EVERYONE!!
  • “And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain:” - Deuteronomy 2:34
How is it so many are ok with that???
If the biblical account of Jericho genocide is true, it’s encouraging evil - like Islam & Christian killings/Crusades. If it is false, it’s still preaching murder, and what other evil lies are taken as literally true & good? The Bible has undoubtedly been corrupted to some degree, but I acknowledge plenty of symbolic truths. Still, I also see it used as a weapon against us, part of PSY COPS.
  • “Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor and Trilateral Commision insider, advised his Illuminati superiors that the New World Order can be established only be employing religion as a key weapon of global influence.”
“Even Christian apologists who attempt to defend the genocide of the Canaanites admit, awkwardly, that scholars find this narrative problematic; William Lane Craig, who attempts to defend the genocide as consistent with divine command theory, concedes that “In fact, ironically, many Old Testament critics are sceptical that the events of the conquest of Canaan ever occurred. They take these stories to be part of the legends of the founding of  Israel, akin to the myths of Romulus and Remus and the founding of Rome. For such critics the problem of God’s issuing such a command evaporates... God reflected their way of seeing the world. Israel was a tribal people who believed in a tribal deity. Second, decades of archaeological excavations do not match up with the biblical conquest account.”
https://jamesbishopblog.com/2020/12/23/ ... -genocide/

:29 The Bible we read today is very different from original... (I disagree with some... I believe in God, even if I question some corrupt scriptures... & Jesus is Latin, his real name was Yeshua). Part 2 :01 Pope Leo demanded all biblical books that weren’t liked, to be burned in 1440. We’re still under Christian (dogmatic/corrupt) Empire. :13 Heavenly Mother was taken out of godhead about 5-600 AD.
https://youtu.be/BP5LdELd_0o

Anyone know of a woman born from a man’s rib, or a donkey talking? Nope, because they’re symbolic (atom/Adam- cellular division... & donkeys represent women - who also carry humans).

What has shown to be dangerous is the belief in evil literal interpretations, to justify more evil.

”Through the haze of legend, the Crusades are remembered as a romantic quest by noble knights wearing crimson crosses. In reality, the Crusades were a sickening nightmare of slaughter, rape, looting, and chaos—mixed with belief in magic. The crusaders killed nearly as many Christians and Jews as they did Muslims, their intended target...

They killed the women, also, and with their swords pierced tender children of whatever age and sex.”


Image

Image

Based on the massive bloodshed in the crusades, & more recent Zionist killings, Christianity/Judaism aren’t religions of peace either.

The foundation of Christianity lies on Judaism, but it seems both were corrupt long ago. Reminds me of Eusebius & some lgbtq promoters who encouraged lying to get their way. After so long, & so many people believing the “orthodox” lies, they wouldn’t even believe the truth if it was plainly presented. Scripture is essentially ideas of men... some ideas are inspiring & godly, some are deceptively evil. Take the best, leave the rest.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

I came across notes... some say Byzantine Christianity was so devastated by Islam that we cannot even study it now. Even more reason to study things out & think critically about dogma - even scriptures.

”The purpose of criticism is not to burn it all to the ground but to shift good from bad and try to make good stronger.” - J Peterson

Lynn
captain of 100
Posts: 915

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Lynn »

If not mistaken, it was this one-
++++++++++++++++
1) 325: 1st Council of Nicaea with Constantine: discussed nature of Christ & Arius declared heretical1) 325: 1st Council of Nicaea with Constantine: discussed nature of Christ & Arius declared heretic
++++++++++++++++

in that Reincarnation was voted out of Christian doctrine. Think about that, if it had to be voted out, then it was already accepted. Clement of Alexandria was quoted in saying "that the prayer of the Gnostic was greater than faith". And in the Greek version of the NT, Paul uses "Kenosis" which is "Gnosis" (The K&E are combined to make a "G"). In Philippians 2:5 it actually states "Let this Gnosis be in you, which was in Christ Jesus".
References--
'The Encyclopedia of Religion' (1987) edited by Mircea Eliade I failed to write down which volume & page number
'The Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics' (1961) edited by James Hastings Volume 7, p.680

If not mistaken, it was this one that the Pope was told his life would be ended if he attended. Therefore the coucil voted without him being there to veto such a move.

I would have to say it was the Gnostics who were the originals. The Romans alterred Christianity to their way of viewing. Were not many of the early Christians killed off in the games? The Romans wanted to control this religion as it seemed not to die out. One area was ousting Reincarnation. The reasoning was simple. That put you in the driver seat with Jesus & God. But the Romans found a way to become the middleman, thus you had to go thru them to get to Jesus & God. As well as allow you to give them your money.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

Lynn wrote: April 25th, 2021, 8:51 pm...Gnostics who were the originals. The Romans alterred Christianity to their way of viewing. Were not many of the early Christians killed off in the games? The Romans wanted to control this religion as it seemed not to die out. One area was ousting Reincarnation. The reasoning was simple. That put you in the driver seat with Jesus & God. But the Romans found a way to become the middleman, thus you had to go thru them to get to Jesus & God. As well as allow you to give them your money.
That pretty well sums it up.

A comment: “Communion, ie drinking blood, is a Satanic ritual.”
It’s doubtful symbols have much power in & of themselves & God looks on the heart even if people get tricked into doing rituals with evil roots. It’s possible & I’d say more common than not, to interpret the sacrament as a beautiful inspiring thing - even if it’s stretched to acknowledge inspiring symbolism of bread (of life) & water (subconscious/spirit). But many people take this literally as eating & drinking of Jesus’s body & blood. My opinion is that this - including the scripture about sacrament - was warped - the ultimate anti-Christ leading people away from what Christ is really about.

"The hocus-pocus phantasm of a God, like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands and thousands of martyrs".
-Source: Thomas Jefferson, Works, Vol. IV, p. 360.

"The whole history of these books (i.e. the Gospels) is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills."
-Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, January 24, 1814.

"Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him (i.e. Jesus) by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being."
-Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to William Short, April 13, 1820.
Last edited by Thinker on May 13th, 2021, 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

abijah`
~dog days~
Posts: 3481

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by abijah` »

The nephilim were supposedly very violent, and would engage in cannibalism and blood drinking, and that these were a central part of their sacraments and rituals.

Consistent with the NT theme of Jesus being the true divine hybrid of heaven & earth - Jesus instead offers His own body and blood as a sacrificial meal. He comes not to be ministered unto (consuming life), but instead to minister (offer His own life).

The symbolism is coherent - sacramentally speaking, you are what you eat. Our God enables us to become as He is... by commanding us to eat and drink Him. Not literally of course, but that's the symbolic image being communicated.
Last edited by abijah` on May 13th, 2021, 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

abijah` wrote: May 13th, 2021, 11:36 am The nephilim were supposedly very violent, and would engage in cannibalism and blood drinking, and that these were a central part of their sacraments and rituals.

Consistent with the NT theme of Jesus being the true divine hybrid of heaven & earth - Jesus instead offers His own body and blood as a sacrificial meal. He comes not to be ministered unto (consuming life), but instead to minister (offer His own life).
No matter how pretty it’s packaged, even the belief in human sacrifice scapegoating & eating Christ’s body & drinking his blood simply feels contrary to God.

I believe in Christ! I believe in the goodness Christ represents - love, forgiveness, speaking up & defending truth and goodness. Unfortunately, ruling Christian dogma demands a belief in human sacrifice scapegoat involving pretending to eat his body & drink his blood, as if you cannot believe in Christ without believing in that seemingly Satanic part thrown in.

abijah`
~dog days~
Posts: 3481

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by abijah` »

Thinker wrote: May 13th, 2021, 11:37 am No matter how pretty it’s packaged, even the belief in human sacrifice scapegoating & eating Christ’s body & drinking his blood simply feels contrary to God.
We see through a glass darkly. If we had the whole story laid out in clarity before our understanding, I suspect you would see not only the wisdom, but the absolute necessity for, and the infinite love in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. And that its true, and that sometimes things that are true are painful, unsettling or things that maybe, ideally shouldn't exist, or so it would seem to us.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

abijah` wrote: May 13th, 2021, 11:42 am
Thinker wrote: May 13th, 2021, 11:37 am No matter how pretty it’s packaged, even the belief in human sacrifice scapegoating & eating Christ’s body & drinking his blood simply feels contrary to God.
We see through a glass darkly. If we had the whole story laid out in clarity before our understanding, I suspect you would see not only the wisdom, but the absolute necessity for, and the infinite love in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. And that its true, and that sometimes things that are true are painful, unsettling or things that maybe, ideally shouldn't exist, or so it would seem to us.
Of course we don’t see everything clearly but some things like “Thou shalt not kill” are quite straightforward. Again, no matter how pretty the wrappings, human sacrifice scapegoating & pretending to drink Christ’s blood is wrong. If we hadn’t been indoctrinated for centuries otherwise, this would be plain as day.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

Will dogmatic Christ’s 2nd coming be portrayed in ways that deceive many?
  • ” And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.” - Luke 17:29-21
From another thread:
...considering how religion is being used as part of psychological warfare deception, please be careful.

Religion has been, is & will be used to try to manipulate minds.
  • “Zbigniew Brzezinski, former National Security Advisor and Trilateral Commision insider, advised his Illuminati superiors that the New World Order can be established only be employing religion as a key weapon of global influence.”
Image
https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/64 ... -the-skies

“The bizarre apparition seen above Orange County in California (2016) was virtually identical to a flying city that earlier appeared above (2015 Foshan) China...”

Image
http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com ... s.html?m=1

” The Washington Post also reported that a secret program was established in 1994 to pursue holographic technology for psychological operations (PSYOPs) applications, and that projecting "large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air" was found to be feasible by a military physicist...

...floating cities had been seen in China, first over Foshan in the Guangdong province, and a few days later in the province of Jiangxi. A similar “phantom city” was seen over China in 2011. In May, 2015 villagers in Dulali, in Lanzai South Ward, Darazo, Africa Local Government of Bauchi State, Nigeria also witnessed a city floating over their village on multiple occasions, replete with cars and emanating mechanical noises – a sight they attributed to Allah.
Such sightings have focused attention on theories that governments may possess the technology to project giant holograms which could be used for wide-scale deception which might now be undergoing testing on unsuspecting citizens to gauge their reactions. ”

https://consciousreporter.com/sci-tech/ ... blue-beam/

I find it really interesting how Joseph Smith saw the tendencies of religions to become corrupt...
"They draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof."

SgNative
captain of 50
Posts: 82

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by SgNative »

Thinker wrote: August 28th, 2019, 2:14 pm A basic timeline:
*I’m particularly interested in the time of Christ, immediately before and after, and topics of discussion at the councils which may shed light on the former. Also, note how much our & others’ religion has been created by vote and other uninspired means.

300 BC: OT canonized

1 AD: Mithraism - Graco/Roman secret society
1 AD: Gnostics - quest for divine knowledge, thread through various religions but later Church rejected Docetists and began the Inquisition with Albigensians.

Image

312 AD: Emperor Constantine ordered bible copies
  • 7 Catholic Councils:
    1) 325: 1st Council of Nicaea with Constantine: discussed nature of Christ & Arius declared heretical
    2) 381: 1st Council of Constantinople: Arianism, Apollinarism, Sabellianism, Holy Spirit
    3) 431: 1st Council of Ephesus: Nestorianism, Theotokos, Pelagianism
    4) 451: 1st Council of Chabedon; Christ’s humanity/divinity
    5) 553: 2nd Council of Constantinople: Nestorianism, Monophysitism
    6) 680: 3rd Council of Constantinople: Monophysitism
    7) 787: 2nd Council of Nicaea: Iconoclasm
383: NT from Hebrew/Greek to Latin
400: Hebrew/Greek bible into Latin
500: Hebrew/Greek Bible into various languages
600: Catholic Church declares Latin only language for scripture
900: Gnostics re-emerged but oppressed
1200: Gnostics/Albigensians rejected by Church, Inquisition
1229: Council of Toulouse forbids lay people from owning a bible
1382: John Wycliffe translates LATIN bible to English

1525: William Tyndale translates Hebrew/Greek Bible to English, killed for heresy 1536
1611: KJV (King James Version, bible) Now, +1Billion copies, most printed book in world
1950’s: Dead Sea Scrolls discovered
1983: Silver Scrolls discovered
Also take into account the use of the letters i and j in front of dates that may look like a 1 but are really referring to year of the lord not one thousand. It has been very deceptive. You can see this evident in old coins as well as texts.

SgNative
captain of 50
Posts: 82

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by SgNative »

Thinker wrote: May 13th, 2021, 11:26 am
Lynn wrote: April 25th, 2021, 8:51 pm...Gnostics who were the originals. The Romans alterred Christianity to their way of viewing. Were not many of the early Christians killed off in the games? The Romans wanted to control this religion as it seemed not to die out. One area was ousting Reincarnation. The reasoning was simple. That put you in the driver seat with Jesus & God. But the Romans found a way to become the middleman, thus you had to go thru them to get to Jesus & God. As well as allow you to give them your money.
That pretty well sums it up.

A comment: “Communion, ie drinking blood, is a Satanic ritual.”
It’s doubtful symbols have much power in & of themselves & God looks on the heart even if people get tricked into doing rituals with evil roots. It’s possible & I’d say more common than not, to interpret the sacrament as a beautiful inspiring thing - even if it’s stretched to acknowledge inspiring symbolism of bread (of life) & water (subconscious/spirit). But many people take this literally as eating & drinking of Jesus’s body & blood. My opinion is that this - including the scripture about sacrament - was warped - the ultimate anti-Christ leading people away from what Christ is really about.

"The hocus-pocus phantasm of a God, like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands and thousands of martyrs".
-Source: Thomas Jefferson, Works, Vol. IV, p. 360.

"The whole history of these books (i.e. the Gospels) is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills."
-Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, January 24, 1814.

"Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him (i.e. Jesus) by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being."
-Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to William Short, April 13, 1820.
This is interesting to me. I went a whole year almost without the sacrament due to this whole Covid thing. And in that time, I felt closer to Christ than ever in my life. I had also toward the end of that time of no sacrament came across some other things like you mention here.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

SgNative wrote: May 13th, 2021, 1:21 pm
Thinker wrote: May 13th, 2021, 11:26 amA comment: “Communion, ie drinking blood, is a Satanic ritual.”
It’s doubtful symbols have much power in & of themselves & God looks on the heart even if people get tricked into doing rituals with evil roots. It’s possible & I’d say more common than not, to interpret the sacrament as a beautiful inspiring thing - even if it’s stretched to acknowledge inspiring symbolism of bread (of life) & water (subconscious/spirit). But many people take this literally as eating & drinking of Jesus’s body & blood. My opinion is that this - including the scripture about sacrament - was warped - the ultimate anti-Christ leading people away from what Christ is really about.

"The hocus-pocus phantasm of a God, like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands and thousands of martyrs".
-Source: Thomas Jefferson, Works, Vol. IV, p. 360.

"The whole history of these books (i.e. the Gospels) is so defective and doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause, to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick out diamonds from dunghills."
-Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, January 24, 1814.

"Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him (i.e. Jesus) by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being."
-Source: Letter of Thomas Jefferson to William Short, April 13, 1820.
Also take into account the use of the letters i and j in front of dates that may look like a 1 but are really referring to year of the lord not one thousand...

This is interesting to me. I went a whole year almost without the sacrament due to this whole Covid thing. And in that time, I felt closer to Christ than ever in my life. I had also toward the end of that time of no sacrament came across some other things like you mention here.
Thanks - I wasn’t aware of the i or j being mistaken for 1. The way I remember the name of the “Father of Church History”- Eusebius - is BS (Bi Us). 😁This father of BS-ers said:
  • “It is an act of virtue to deceive & lie, when by such means the interest of the church might be promoted.”
    &
    “It will sometimes be necessary to use falsehood for the benefit of those who need such a mode of treatment.”
And thank you for not freaking out but actually seeing some truth in something so often considered heretical.
Last edited by Thinker on May 13th, 2021, 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SgNative
captain of 50
Posts: 82

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by SgNative »

I actually know of someone who left the church over the sacrament.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

SgNative wrote: May 13th, 2021, 1:32 pm I actually know of someone who left the church over the sacrament.
I wish I could give them a hug.

We proudly “home-church” our kids. 😁 But we continue to do sacrament, despite me explaining my issue with it a while ago - which maybe they forgot. And now, I roll with the punches & try to imagine & teach my kids more healthy, inspiring symbolic interpretations.
Last edited by Thinker on May 13th, 2021, 1:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.

SgNative
captain of 50
Posts: 82

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by SgNative »

If my spouse were awake I would do the same.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

SgNative wrote: May 13th, 2021, 1:39 pm If my spouse were awake I would do the same.
Virtual hug sent for you too. It’s tough. 🙏 💫

Regarding sacrament at home... I recently ran into a member (bishopric secretary?) & explained how I don’t feel comfortable with Zoom & masks at church so we have church at home. He’s like, “but the sacrament?” I said, “that too.” And then he told me how the leaders will soon not allow that. 🤣😂 I said (in my mind) “GOOD ONE!” 😁

Actually, I used scripture to make my point. Using authority to promote something (like covid shots) known to be harmful is unrighteous dominion & “amen to the priesthood of that man.” I try to please & answer to God - not people - not even really popular people.

SgNative
captain of 50
Posts: 82

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by SgNative »

I am the same and haven’t done any zoom meetings. When they went back to meeting in person I was the only person not masked. My kids started asking why and I had a wonderful teaching opportunity I took. But it has been awkward with my husband to say the least, though he is allowing them to go to youth activities unmasked.

Lynn
captain of 100
Posts: 915

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Lynn »

Something to think about ...

Think back now to the time of the Master in the Middle East & even into southern Europe. A person who is not one of these new Christianty followers, just happen to find or intercept a letter from these groups known as Christians. As you read the letter, you see that they partake of drinking blood & eating of bodies. Well, what can you assume? Ye Gads, are these Christians something akin to bloodsuckers and cannibals? But yet, not understanding that it was a ritual intended to have spiritual significance, not what it was "read" as (be interpreted as).So, some of the early Christians may have had a target on their back due to this misunderstanding.

Then you have this influx of neophytes (newbies) in the Christian groups, and of course being new, they were given bread, not meat, as to understanding everything. They were as children, not adults. But as Rome was trying to reconcile this movement of Christianity, it sought to gain control. Therefore certain things were infused. And these "adults", who had the "meat" of the situation were referred to as the Gnostics, because it seems they claimed to know or had some insider information as to the true understanding. If only, the "adults" could be silenced or removed, then we (Rome) might gain control & then adjust their doctrine. And by doing so, we gain the upper hand.

Even though we have gained control, we must change certain items which pose a threat to our becoming the emissary between these people & Jesus. Hmm, what items can we assure our success. One is to have the doctrine of reincarnation removed completely. Reasoning of course, is that it allows an individual to be able to stand before God bypassing us, the Church. Just to make sure it is voted out, since it has been awhile, we need to make sure & keep the Pope at home, even if we have to threaten him .

Well Done! We did it. Let us see what else we can vote out, in order to take more control. ...

Lynn
captain of 100
Posts: 915

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Lynn »

Speaking of Thomas Jefferson, I have a copy of the Jefferson Bible. Basically he whittled down the 4 gospels of the NT into the doctrines & words of Jesus. My copy is the Firtst Henry Holt Edition 1995 HB w/BJ. I got it from Reader's Subscription (a book club).

User avatar
TheDuke
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5911
Location: Eastern Sodom Suburbs

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by TheDuke »

Sorry, just reread the sacrament prayers. don,t see any eating or drinking blood, etc... I see "remembrance" and words like that. I think someone is mixing Catholic doctrine in here. Yes, it may have changed over time by fiat, but I've never been taught that our sacrament is such. Even first supper scriptures seem only like an illusion to his sacrifice in few words of course.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

SgNative wrote: May 13th, 2021, 2:06 pm I am the same and haven’t done any zoom meetings. When they went back to meeting in person I was the only person not masked. My kids started asking why and I had a wonderful teaching opportunity I took. But it has been awkward with my husband to say the least, though he is allowing them to go to youth activities unmasked.
Similar here with my husband but thankfully, he is good with us home-churching. I shared with him various concerns (including why I don’t want my kids on Zoom viewtopic.php?f=1&t=57375&p=1068444&hil ... s#p1068444).
Generally, he thinks I’m overreacting. Maybe I am but I’d rather err on the side of caution & it’s helped that after study, thinking & praying a lot - sometimes I’ve questioned myself but I’ve received spiritual reassurance.

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

Lynn wrote: May 13th, 2021, 8:54 pm Speaking of Thomas Jefferson, I have a copy of the Jefferson Bible. Basically he whittled down the 4 gospels of the NT into the doctrines & words of Jesus. My copy is the Firtst Henry Holt Edition 1995 HB w/BJ. I got it from Reader's Subscription (a book club).
Interesting. I may look into that, though it may involve sifting either way & possibly even Jefferson may have imperfectly cherry picked. 😁

A while ago, when I first began questioning dogma surrounding human sacrifice scapegoating, my sister became very concerned, packed a suitcase of Christian/Catholic lit & knocked on my door. Sweet of her - she meant well, but she misunderstood. Then again, I just began reading the Catholic Bible she gave me - but will take my time sifting, like walking through peanut butter. 😁

User avatar
Thinker
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 13101
Location: The Universe - wherever that is.

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by Thinker »

TheDuke wrote: May 13th, 2021, 10:18 pm Sorry, just reread the sacrament prayers. don,t see any eating or drinking blood, etc...
”BLESSING ON THE BREAD
O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this bread to the souls of all those who partake of it, that they may eat in remembrance of the body of thy Son, and witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son, and always remember him and keep his commandments which he has given them; that they may always have his Spirit to be with them. Amen.

BLESSING ON THE WATER
O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this water to the souls of all those who drink of it, that they may do it in remembrance of the blood of thy Son, which was shed for them; that they may witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they do always remember him, that they may have his Spirit to be with them. Amen.”


“Because Christians have been participating in the communion rite for many years, they tend to forget just how bizarre this ritual is. The whole idea of "eating Jesus' body" and "drinking his blood" is grotesque in the extreme.”

And it’s characteristic of Satanism.

”I’m a big fan of the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament. Although no doubt this great man’s words were heavily altered, and indeed, the real guy may have been very little like we read about in the Gospels, there is something so loving and powerful about his energy. It shines right through those dusty pages and speaks to the heart, somehow. It makes you really wish you had been around when he walked the Earth, so you could see and sense firsthand what was going on with this incredible teacher.

The problem as I see it is all the crap that has been overlaid his material since he left us. He never intended for there to be a draconian, bloodthirsty organization forcing worship of him as a divine being on millions of people around the world. Crusades? Inquisitions? Crucifixions? That’s the consciousness of the Custodians, who were worshipped in ancient Rome and ancient Greece (and Egypt, Babylonia, India, China – you name it.) That doesn’t seem to be about him or what he taught – it was the influence of the Custodians trying to hijack the real teachings of Jesus, which were pretty much all about love, kindness, and altruism.

Well, the Custodians didn’t want any of that!

So they added some really nasty stuff into the equation. Now followers of Jesus were supposed to regularly engage in a mystical ritual whereby they emulated DRINKING HIS BLOOD and EATING HIS FLESH.”

https://custodialsmackdown.wordpress.co ... ic-ritual/

Image

^... I too, have often tried to avoid or even flat out denied truth. Just too much sometimes. Mostly I’ve tried to focus on common beliefs & avoided this because I know many aren’t ready for it as I wasn’t for a while. But the stakes for deception are getting higher. It seems likely religion - including corrupt ideas of Christianity - will be used against us. They already have been but it seems much worse is planned.

The HOPE is that there is a narrow way. With God - everything will work out fine. The challenge is amidst all the noise, distraction & deception, to hear the still small voice. As my friend said, “They plan & God plans. And God is the best planner.” But truth must be valued - even above comfortable lies. God is a God of truth.

Edited to add:
I worry how this may be received & pray that we all will be helped on our faith journeys.

Faith Crisis
https://faithcrisis.com/faith-crisis-areas/

Faith Stages (Fowler):
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/38/b4/28 ... bc77d7.jpg

abijah`
~dog days~
Posts: 3481

Re: Christian Origins?

Post by abijah` »

TheDuke wrote: May 13th, 2021, 10:18 pm Sorry, just reread the sacrament prayers. don,t see any eating or drinking blood, etc... I see "remembrance" and words like that. I think someone is mixing Catholic doctrine in here. Yes, it may have changed over time by fiat, but I've never been taught that our sacrament is such. Even first supper scriptures seem only like an illusion to his sacrifice in few words of course.
No I I'm not talking transubstantiation.

I'm saying that there is a reason why the eating+drinking is the way we remember His sacrifice.

There's lots of ways to ritually memorialise something/someone. There's lots of various ways to hold something "in remembrance".

What i'm pointing out is that it is significant that we are to eat bread which is an emblem of His body and drink the wine which is an emblem of His blood.

Because Jesus is foreshadowed and in fact central in the OT, and in the Law, sacrifices = meals. Its eating a meal with your God. Thats why sacrifices = food and drink items, you're supposed to eat and drink the sacrifice, with your God.

So when Christ institutes the sacrament saying the bread is His body and the wine is His blood, the symbolism should be clear. He is the last, great Sacrifice, and like all the other sacrifices before, it constitutes eating & drinking it as a meal with your God.

If it makes one feel queasy, well, so did people in John 6. "This is a hard saying, who can hear it?"

It was the result peoples' reactions to this doctrine that led Christ to ask the those who remained "will ye also go away?"

Post Reply