Page 3 of 3

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 5:33 pm
by setyourselffree
Robin Hood wrote: May 10th, 2019, 5:04 pm
setyourselffree wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:47 pm
Robin Hood wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:41 pm
setyourselffree wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:53 am

Robinhood seems to be in a complete free fall ever since he went to the temple and witnessed the endowment. I hope he can come to grips with this and get himself straight. It's funny how in the church some members will question one thing then all of sudden everything is questioned. I have had several friends who just cannot come to grips with a particular change or doctrine, and all of a sudden everything they knew to be true is gone. It's very sad. Questioning and seeking for answers is good. Questioning with a hard heart is bad.
Don't you worry about me, I'm fine.
You're right, I do have an issue with the endowment changes, but I'm not about to throw the baby out with the bath water because of it.
However, here in Yorkshire we call a spade a spade. No nonsense, straight talking.
Clearly there is something not right in the church, I can deel it in my bones.
I was at a high council meeting recently and the SP said the same thing.
"We are losing the ability to correct the course of the church" Boyd K. Packer
Its funny I don't hear this type of stuff unless its posted in an anonymous forum. People in my Ward or Stake don't talk about how there is something going on with the church.
You mean they don't talk to you about it.
Well I'm in a mid to high level calling so I think I would know. I'm not saying that to boast just to say where I'm coming from.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 6:49 pm
by lundbaek
My experiences and observations lead me to agree with Stahura, that "The beliefs of Bishops and Stake Presidents can vary between each other as much as the difference in opinions here on this forum." Attitudes and support and testimony of various principles of the Gospel seem to vary sometimes quite a bit in this here part of Arizona.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 10:04 pm
by Cheetos
setyourselffree wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:47 pm
Robin Hood wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:41 pm
setyourselffree wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:53 am
eddie wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:48 am

Robin Hood, I have watched you go from defending the true Church upon the earth today, to saying things like this? This Church stands alone, its so obvious that the Lord is blessing His church. We are on the front lines being on the earth in this dispensation. We have also been warned that even the very elect will be deceived. Please don't let this happen to you.
Robinhood seems to be in a complete free fall ever since he went to the temple and witnessed the endowment. I hope he can come to grips with this and get himself straight. It's funny how in the church some members will question one thing then all of sudden everything is questioned. I have had several friends who just cannot come to grips with a particular change or doctrine, and all of a sudden everything they knew to be true is gone. It's very sad. Questioning and seeking for answers is good. Questioning with a hard heart is bad.
Don't you worry about me, I'm fine.
You're right, I do have an issue with the endowment changes, but I'm not about to throw the baby out with the bath water because of it.
However, here in Yorkshire we call a spade a spade. No nonsense, straight talking.
Clearly there is something not right in the church, I can deel it in my bones.
I was at a high council meeting recently and the SP said the same thing.
"We are losing the ability to correct the course of the church" Boyd K. Packer
Its funny I don't hear this type of stuff unless its posted in an anonymous forum. People in my Ward or Stake don't talk about how there is something going on with the church.
It's generally because most of the fringe Mormons surf the forums and spread Ill will. It's become a rather big problem. I've watched it spread like cancer over the last two decades. It used to be our enemy was non members and now it's from within almost exclusively. And, most of these negative posters aren't really active members but rather the questioning fringe crowd who sit on the fence.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 10:06 pm
by Zathura
Cheetos wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:04 pm
setyourselffree wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:47 pm
Robin Hood wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:41 pm
setyourselffree wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:53 am

Robinhood seems to be in a complete free fall ever since he went to the temple and witnessed the endowment. I hope he can come to grips with this and get himself straight. It's funny how in the church some members will question one thing then all of sudden everything is questioned. I have had several friends who just cannot come to grips with a particular change or doctrine, and all of a sudden everything they knew to be true is gone. It's very sad. Questioning and seeking for answers is good. Questioning with a hard heart is bad.
Don't you worry about me, I'm fine.
You're right, I do have an issue with the endowment changes, but I'm not about to throw the baby out with the bath water because of it.
However, here in Yorkshire we call a spade a spade. No nonsense, straight talking.
Clearly there is something not right in the church, I can deel it in my bones.
I was at a high council meeting recently and the SP said the same thing.
"We are losing the ability to correct the course of the church" Boyd K. Packer
Its funny I don't hear this type of stuff unless its posted in an anonymous forum. People in my Ward or Stake don't talk about how there is something going on with the church.
It's generally because most of the fringe Mormons surf the forums and spread Ill will. It's become a rather big problem. I've watched it spread like cancer over the last two decades. It used to be our enemy was non members and now it's from within almost exclusively. And, most of these negative posters aren't really active members but rather the questioning fringe crowd who sit on the fence.
Yes, you must know how active all of these people are. I'm assuming you have uncanny discernment skills?

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 10:08 pm
by Michelle
thestock wrote: May 10th, 2019, 1:21 pm
MMbelieve wrote: May 10th, 2019, 1:09 pm

Why not put responsibility on the members? God will hold us accountable wont he?
We have been taught and continue to be taught correct principles to govern our lives by. What your alluding to has ZERO to do with basic truths of being Christlike in our lives. We know to be honest, charitable/love others, give service, chaste, virtuous, humble, keep covenants, be true to spouse, raise good children etc. Even if we take our church and lump it will all others who believe in Christ then we should, at a minimum, be living the 10 commandments.

Its pretty immature to blame an organization when the organization is made up of its own members. Either way you want to look at it, its the members. The only other to put responsibility on is God, and we should be wise enough to not take that step.

Imagine if every member actually kept their covenants, became Christ-like and did their part. Do you think the preaching that happens today from the conference center would be the same? I sure don't! Makes me think of the city of Enoch, they were truly set apart from the rest because of who they became individually and collectively.
First off, you described many many families in the Church that I know. So I do think members of our Church are humble, chaste, keep covenants etc. Has the percentage of these changed? I dont know. I mean we had many Apostles in the early church who apostatized and became enemies of the Church. So to compare, our era is better in that regard. What about basic members? Again, I have no idea.....but I dont think the PERCENTAGE of people who are less faithful has changed.....maybe the numbers since we are a bit larger than before.

So then it boils down to you blaming the members for the CULTURE of the church changing. Why would you blame them? The leaders set the tone for the culture. The leaders have always been late to the society's party of changing culture. The civil rights movement began in the 60's. The Church fought it, and then in 1978 gave up the fight. The homosexual agenda began in the early 2000's. The church fought it, and now you see the leaders of the Church caving in slowly.

So the question boils down to, why are the members no longer down with the CULTURE of the church anymore? The answer, in my opinion, is because they dont trust the leaders as much. We can agree to disagree, but I dont think you can win me over by telling me people are too wicked. That wont work. The circle of friends and family that I can see works as hard as ever and serves as much as ever and is as spiritual as ever, even if we dont get to every fireside or potluck dinner.
About 10 years ago I was visiting with the female presidencies our ward: Relief Society, Young Women's and Primary. As we conversed I shared a funny story that happened one night while praying with my husband. All of the group expressed surprise that my husband and I read our scriptures and prayed together every night. These were amazing ladies, cream of the crop of the ward at the time, but none of them kept that practice with their husbands.

Teaching and visiting at church it has come to my attention that most members have -never- read the entire Bible and not many more had read the entire Book of Mormon, let alone the Doctrine and Covenants and Pearl of Great Price, even if they had attended seminary.

These two experience taught me that 1. It is not the leaders fault if the members don't know the truth. We have been told by every prophet to pray and read our scriptures. The truth is available to us. 2. Being a wise virgin may not be as hard as most people think. The small and simple things really do lead to great things.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 10:24 pm
by Cheetos
Stahura wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:06 pm
Cheetos wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:04 pm
setyourselffree wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:47 pm
Robin Hood wrote: May 10th, 2019, 4:41 pm

Don't you worry about me, I'm fine.
You're right, I do have an issue with the endowment changes, but I'm not about to throw the baby out with the bath water because of it.
However, here in Yorkshire we call a spade a spade. No nonsense, straight talking.
Clearly there is something not right in the church, I can deel it in my bones.
I was at a high council meeting recently and the SP said the same thing.
"We are losing the ability to correct the course of the church" Boyd K. Packer
Its funny I don't hear this type of stuff unless its posted in an anonymous forum. People in my Ward or Stake don't talk about how there is something going on with the church.
It's generally because most of the fringe Mormons surf the forums and spread Ill will. It's become a rather big problem. I've watched it spread like cancer over the last two decades. It used to be our enemy was non members and now it's from within almost exclusively. And, most of these negative posters aren't really active members but rather the questioning fringe crowd who sit on the fence.
Yes, you must know how active all of these people are. I'm assuming you have uncanny discernment skills?
Let me just say that the habitual complainers and naysayers aren't the ones who religiously go to church every Sunday and fulfill their callings with a full purpose of heart.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 10:24 pm
by Zathura
Michelle wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:08 pm It is not the leaders fault if the members don't know the truth.
How?

Follow the Prophet Follow the Prophet Follow the Prophet.

If you misunderstand doctrine it's not the Prophet's fault.


How?

Mathew 15:14
14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
Isaiah 9:16
16 For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed.
Matthew 23:24
24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

How is it that the Lord frequently places blame on the leaders of his people or criticizes them but in 2019 it's never the leaders fault?

If you are a leader and you teach something incorrectly you will have to answer for that. The blind leading the blind BOTH fall in.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 10:47 pm
by Chip
justme wrote: May 10th, 2019, 2:39 pm
tdj wrote: May 10th, 2019, 12:39 pm
MMbelieve wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:33 am I think its the members. People are not the same anymore. Less values, less commitments and respect for sacred things. Selfishness and vanity.
Liberalism and feminism have creeped in. NOTHING good happens when those types of people get involved. Absolutely nothing. They're a cancer, a disease.
So is conservativeism and maleism.
There's that Sodomite banter, again. No surprise who penned that one.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 11:01 pm
by brianj
Michelle wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:08 pm About 10 years ago I was visiting with the female presidencies our ward: Relief Society, Young Women's and Primary. As we conversed I shared a funny story that happened one night while praying with my husband. All of the group expressed surprise that my husband and I read our scriptures and prayed together every night. These were amazing ladies, cream of the crop of the ward at the time, but none of them kept that practice with their husbands.

Teaching and visiting at church it has come to my attention that most members have -never- read the entire Bible and not many more had read the entire Book of Mormon, let alone the Doctrine and Covenants and Pearl of Great Price, even if they had attended seminary.

These two experience taught me that 1. It is not the leaders fault if the members don't know the truth. We have been told by every prophet to pray and read our scriptures. The truth is available to us. 2. Being a wise virgin may not be as hard as most people think. The small and simple things really do lead to great things.
When I went to the MTC, 21 months after I was baptized, I was the only convert in my district and the only one in that district who had read the Book of Mormon all the way through. I was also the only one who had read the entire D&C and the only one who had read the entire Pearl of Great Price. On my mission I read the Bible cover to cover, but I admit to skimming over a bunch of genealogical chapters.

However, I have spoken with a church member who has said that knowing that genealogy of the prophets and kings is a key to understanding Isaiah. I plan to start making my own charts in the near future.

And yes, I agree with you that being a wise virgin is a pretty simple and easy thing to accomplish. It starts with praying alone daily, reading scripture alone daily, and if you are fortunate enough to have family reading and praying with them daily. But too many church members have been persuaded that they only need to be baptized and go to church occasionally to be fine.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 11:10 pm
by Robin Hood
gangbusters wrote: May 10th, 2019, 1:54 pm I believe it was President Oaks who once said that if a woman does not consent to the conception of the child, she shouldn't be forced to keep it. I can't disagree with that principle.
I can.
Using that principle, any pregnancy that occurs despite the deployment of birth control, falls into the same category.
Expand the principle to other areas of life and it is exposed for the nonsense it is.
If President Oaks said that, he is wrong.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 10th, 2019, 11:21 pm
by Thinker
gangbusters wrote: May 10th, 2019, 1:54 pmAnd concerning the abortion issue some have raised. I believe it was President Oaks who once said that if a woman does not consent to the conception of the child, she shouldn't be forced to keep it. I can't disagree with that principle.
(Robinhood - I had written this before I just saw yours... :) )
I can disagree for a few reasons:
1) By his lack of logic, about 1/2 of all pregnancies which are unplanned, ought to be aborted, since there was no consent or intent to get pregnant.
2) 2 wrongs don’t make a right. “Thou shalt not kill” has just one exception: if by killing one, you save more... so if a mother would die, in keeping a pregnancy then the baby would also - so it makes sense to save 1 by killing 1 than for both to die.
3) Assuming it’s ok to kill a child (developing human being) because of the sin of a parent also is an immoral principle - which if applied literally - would kill the entire human race.
4) Would Oaks kill a child? No, he’s suggesting paying others to.
5) What if this child were just a few months older - where his/her cries and personality weren’t muffled and hidden in the amniotic fluid and womb but could be heard and seen. Who, in their right mind, would ever kill a defenseless child?

Maybe part of the problem is that the elect ARE being led and leading others astray.

When a brave lady exercised her right for freedom of religion, in refusing to issue a marriage license to a couple with homosexual preferences, Oaks stepped out of his authority by criticizing this woman for stepping out of her authority. Prophets are supposed to be like spiritual warriors - standing up for what’s of God - not criticizing others for doing what they should be doing.

BTW, Another major cause for change is the www, smart phones, etc.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 1:06 am
by Aprhys
I didn't intend to cause any contention. I recall growing up in Colorado and my dad being in the stake leadership. We often had to drive across the state so Kansas so that he could speak in a ward or stake. I also remember being invited by random members to have lunch or dinner at their home. I even recall sleeping on the floor or members who I had never met. What I recall is that we were ALL a family. Now, if someone in the ward has a crisis how many of the members will drop everything to run over and help? Maybe things weren't exactly as I remember.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 2:16 am
by Enlightenment
It's a shame so many do not see what is really happening in the church. The church has been embracing the teachings of Jesus Christ more than ever. Doing everything it can to put Jesus Christ at the center. Doing everything it can to put His teachings at the center of every member and family. His greatest teaching to love God and to love one another. The churches goal is that of Gods. To focus on the heart. To fill it with love. The church has become so focused on being so loving that so many are mistaking it for being weak. Love is what is going to take each and everyone who will truly embrace this characteristic to the celestial arms of your savior Jesus Christ. Love is not weak my friends. It is more powerful than all of us combined. Love is Godly. Love is God. Let us embrace Jesus Christ. Let us forsake the ego. Let us love everyone around us. Let the words that come out of our mouths be always loving. Let our actions always be loving. Let us embrace the spirit of Christ like never before. "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control." You can all be like Christ. I know you can because your spirit is actually from God. Which gives you all the characteristics to be exactly like Him. Be not ashamed to be member of "The Church of Jesus Christ of latter day saints". The church is embracing Christ like never before. Are you?

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 3:02 am
by James Paul
Well here goes from an old 84 year old coot. I was married to my LDS wife in 1972 by an LDS bishop in Lovelock, Nevada, as we came across the name of the town on our way to Reno.
I joined the church at age 40, after spending 3 years learning, observing and living the region as I started slowly and deliberately to see if I could live it. As a non member I worked on the welfare farm, was my wife's visiting teaching companion in the Summer as her assigned companion went home to Salt Lake for her vacation from school where she was a librarian. My wife said she never worked at observing the rules of the church as hard as she did those 3 years.
When I finally joined in Tucson AZ in 1975, Spencer W. Kimball was prophet and every thing he said made sense to me. Abortion was not yet a discussion item in the church as there had been no reason until a period of time after Roe V Wade changed the law of the land.
Garments have changed many times since they were first created, ans temple ceremonies have also changed a fair number of times during my time in the Church. Assorted reasons have been thought about each time, but not much changed regarding membership and attitudes.
I was busy trying to learn all I could read as I gave up reading ANY fiction from my baptism date. I had begun to learn about PROPHECY which I never knew existed, and everyone in the church told me, no need to worry about the Lord returning as ALL worthy males have to have the priesthood before he returns. About 1 1/2 years later came the announcement that ALL worthy males could hold the priesthood. We were living in Utah by that time and the furor within the church was shocking to me. The Salt Lake Tribune had a FULL page ad, listing the names of companies and members who denounced that as being false. I have since learned to expect ANYTHING from that paper.
I watched the evolvement of the abortion issue as we were part of the Right to Life movement, carrying petitions to place the issue on the ballot so there could be a final solution. During the Pioneer Day parade we were collecting signatures as we asked as many as we could if they would sign a petition to place abortion on the ballot. As we approached a couple the husband spoke up and said, SURE I will. The wife grabbed him and said no you won't. They continued walking away and it was about 5 minutes later the husband returned and said, I got away from her and I will sign before she misses me. I have always wondered how a couple did not even know they had opposing views?
During the time that the abortion issue has been on TR interviews, it has changed a few times. At first it was ONLY the life of the mother. A number of months later, after much fussing the rape and incest were added and all was well for a couple of years. Next thing we heard, If the baby will be born deformed, and then a few years alter was added, if the child will not survive outside of the mothers' womb.
The last I knew this was to be decided AFTER a bishop's interview was conducted with the couple.
I mentioned to my RM son a few years ago, that I felt like the Church was now teaching the doctrine of the Terrestrial Kingdom. His reply seemed to agree, but what we used to hear OFTEN and I have not for a few years. "There is a higher law that we are to follow and adhere to." I believe that we are in a time where ALL righteous folks are to be brought to the reward of living on Earth as Christ rules, which will include the Terrestrial. So why would we not welcome them to meet Christ?

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 3:07 am
by James Paul
More recently I am in the Philippines with a temple sealed wife after my 42 years sealed wife died and my health began to falter. With 2 operating temples and 4 MORE announced with one ground breaking, big things are expected here as the Lord's time draws near.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 5:05 am
by BeNotDeceived
James Paul wrote: May 11th, 2019, 3:07 am More recently I am in the Philippines with a temple sealed wife after my 42 years sealed wife died and my health began to falter. With 2 operating temples and 4 MORE announced with one ground breaking, big things are expected here as the Lord's time draws near.
https://otecorporation.com/projects/ wrote: The Philippines: Multiple OTEC/Potable Water plants – OTE consultants have attended meetings with representatives of the Philippines government. We have discussed the opportunity with the US Department of Commerce and the US Embassy in Manila, Philippines under the ‘Gold Key Service’
Watching with interest :P

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 7:23 am
by gangbusters
Robin Hood wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:10 pm
gangbusters wrote: May 10th, 2019, 1:54 pm I believe it was President Oaks who once said that if a woman does not consent to the conception of the child, she shouldn't be forced to keep it. I can't disagree with that principle.
I can.
Using that principle, any pregnancy that occurs despite the deployment of birth control, falls into the same category.
Expand the principle to other areas of life and it is exposed for the nonsense it is.
If President Oaks said that, he is wrong.
“Consent” meaning someone who did not consent to having sex, not someone who merely didn’t want to have a baby. I could’ve explained it better.

I personally would strongly prefer to see the woman give the baby up for adoption, but I don’t believe it’d be our right to make her do it in that instance.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 8:06 am
by Thinker
Thinker wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:21 pm
gangbusters wrote: May 10th, 2019, 1:54 pmAnd concerning the abortion issue some have raised. I believe it was President Oaks who once said that if a woman does not consent to the conception of the child, she shouldn't be forced to keep it. I can't disagree with that principle.
(Robinhood - I had written this before I just saw yours... :) )
I can disagree for a few reasons:
1) By his lack of logic, about 1/2 of all pregnancies which are unplanned, ought to be aborted, since there was no consent or intent to get pregnant.
2) 2 wrongs don’t make a right. “Thou shalt not kill” has just one exception: if by killing one, you save more... so if a mother would die, in keeping a pregnancy then the baby would also - so it makes sense to save 1 by killing 1 than for both to die.
3) Assuming it’s ok to kill a child (developing human being) because of the sin of a parent also is an immoral principle - which if applied literally - would kill the entire human race.
4) Would Oaks kill a child? No, he’s suggesting paying others to.
5) What if this child were just a few months older - where his/her cries and personality weren’t muffled and hidden in the amniotic fluid and womb but could be heard and seen. Who, in their right mind, would ever kill a defenseless child?

Maybe part of the problem is that the elect ARE being led and leading others astray.

When a brave lady exercised her right for freedom of religion, in refusing to issue a marriage license to a couple with homosexual preferences, Oaks stepped out of his authority by criticizing this woman for stepping out of her authority. Prophets are supposed to be like spiritual warriors - standing up for what’s of God - not criticizing others for doing what they should be doing.

BTW, Another major cause for change is the www, smart phones, etc.
As it is mothers have the legal right to kill their children - if they are young enough. A genocide based on age discrimination. Ironic (or hypocritical) coming from predominantly feminists who are obsessed with them being discriminated against in their victim mentality. Discussing this on this forum is not going to change laws, but it could change hearts by showing what is moral and of God and what isn’t. The only time killing a child in womb is moral is when doing so would save at least 1 life rather than losing 2.

I believe each life is of value - even with disabilities - whether it is a vision disability (being near-sighted etc) or other disabilities.  Some bring up the health of children as reason for abortion, but keep in mind that the cases of fetal health issues are only 0.5% (1/2 a percent). 
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/ ... asons.html

Some have resisted abortion even when doctors recommended it due to health complications, and many of us have benefited from such a decision...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6QfKCGTfn3o

Human development facts explain that by 8 weeks gestation (before most abortions), ALL body systems are intact, including the central nervous system (pain receptors).  A child’s (developing human being’s) heart begins beating 22 days (about 3 weeks) after conception.  
 The following is a live abortion - you can see how the child is hurting as he/she is being killed. Notice the usual signs given of pain (intensely increased heart beat, agitation, trying to get away from the murder weapon).

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X3ZQURkpGY0

Surgeon Robert P. N. Shearin states that: [1]
  • * “As early as eight to ten weeks after conception, and definitely by thirteen-and-a-half weeks, the unborn experiences organic pain…. First, the unborn child’s mouth, at eight weeks, then her hands at ten weeks, then her face, arms, and legs at eleven weeks become sensitive to touch. By thirteen-and-a-half weeks, she responds to pain at all levels of her nervous system in an integrated response which cannot be termed a mere reflex. She can now experience pain.”  https://www.abortionfacts.com/facts/13
Abortion is big business...
  • * “The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), the research arm of Planned Parenthood, estimates that there were 1.21 million abortions performed in the U.S. in the year 2005. Of the 1.21 million annual abortions, approximately 88% (1.06 million) are performed during the first trimester. The other 12% (150,000) are performed during the second and third trimester. In 2005, the average cost of a nonhospital abortion with local anesthesia at 10 weeks of gestation was $413. The Women's Medical Center estimates that a 2nd trimester abortion costs up to $3000 (with the price increasing the further along the pregnancy goes). If we take the $413 average for 1st trimester abortions and use a $3000 average for 2nd and 3rd trimester abortions, here's what we get: $438 million is spent each year on first trimester abortions and $393 million is spent on late term abortions. That means that each year in the U.S., the abortion industry brings in approximately $831 million through their abortion services alone. If you add in the $337 million (or more) that Planned Parenthood (America's largest abortion provider) receives annually in government grants and contracts for, the annual dollar amount moves well past 1 billion.”  https://www.abort73.com/abortion/abortion_for_profit/

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 11:25 am
by Thinker
Consider someone you may have known who has had bad habits for most of their lives but whenever anyone brings it up, they lash out at them and “shoot the messenger” - whether it be a doctor or a loved one. What generally happens to people who refuse constructive feedback? Unchecked, they get worse or at least continue with dysfunctional behavior. Companies know this and PAY for feedback - positive or negative - so they can improve.

A couple historical examples of how lack of accountability leads to degradation:
  • “Since the first messenger who told Tigranes (King of Armenia) that Lucullus was coming had his head cut off for his pains, no one else would tell him anything, and so he sat in ignorance while the fires of war were already blazing around him, giving ear only to those who flattered him.”
  • “The emperors of the ancient world held an incredible amount of power. Those who ruled over the kingdoms of ancient China were called the sons of Heaven. They were deified men whose every word was to be followed without question. When a whole kingdom follows your every word, it can be hard to stay stable, but it’s easy to fall into a decadent and unstable life.”
Now, remember what has happened to many who provide negative feedback about the church. Is it appreciated, considered and thereby used to “repent” and move closer to the godly mark? Or do they “shoot the messenger” by excommunication, or other negative treatment? And what is the effect - of refusing negative feedback?

Image

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 11:35 am
by tdj
justme wrote: May 10th, 2019, 2:39 pm
tdj wrote: May 10th, 2019, 12:39 pm
MMbelieve wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:33 am I think its the members. People are not the same anymore. Less values, less commitments and respect for sacred things. Selfishness and vanity.
Liberalism and feminism have creeped in. NOTHING good happens when those types of people get involved. Absolutely nothing. They're a cancer, a disease.
So is conservativeism and maleism.
No, conservatives have always been a foundational reason this country achieved the positive and great things it has. It's only been since liberalism has taken a strong hold and the dems have gone bat poop crazy that we've gone downhill and lost our edge.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 11:38 am
by tdj
Michelle wrote: May 10th, 2019, 12:48 pm
tdj wrote: May 10th, 2019, 12:33 pm
mes5464 wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:59 am The church once didn't allow any abortion. Now you can for rape, incest, and health of the mother.
Divorce is much easier to come by. You hardly ever saw a blended family.
Stricter punishment was more common, like excommunication.

That's three I can think of.
My husband and I were stunned some months back when it was revealed by a leader that rape and incest were considered acceptable exceptions. Awful thing for the mother, but the baby still deserves a chance to live. The ONLY exception I can think of is if the mothers life is in danger, which technically all pregnancies qualify as that, but if it's an unusual case of exceptional danger, then the mom ought to be allowed to make such a decision. However, what bothers me more isn't so much the mom being allowed to take that option, but the sad and horrifying reality that more and more of them ARE going that route.

Something like an ectopic pregnancy is a no brainer. The child is doomed, and the mother will die if it's allowed to progress. Sad, but true.
It is rare, but ectopic mother's and babies do survive. That is why we are to pray and trust the Holy Spirit. Here are some examples:

http://www.personhoodinitiative.com/suc ... ncies.html

https://ectopicbabyhope.wordpress.com/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... -baby.html

https://www.lifenews.com/2015/12/28/mir ... s-removed/

https://realchoice.blogspot.com/2011/05 ... nancy.html
Maybe if the kid attached somewhere other then the tube. But the uterus and vagina were the only parts of a womans body built by God to accomodate a baby. Anywhere else, and it just doesn't really work too well. And I can tell you from seeing it first hand, that the fallopian tube would never work. I've known a woman who was screaming in pain because she had a pregnancy in her tube and it had grown to the size of a golfball and was about to burst.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 11:54 am
by rimbauer.peter
brianj wrote: May 10th, 2019, 11:01 pm
When I went to the MTC, 21 months after I was baptized, I was the only convert in my district and the only one in that district who had read the Book of Mormon all the way through. I was also the only one who had read the entire D&C and the only one who had read the entire Pearl of Great Price. On my mission I read the Bible cover to cover, but I admit to skimming over a bunch of genealogical chapters.

However, I have spoken with a church member who has said that knowing that genealogy of the prophets and kings is a key to understanding Isaiah. I plan to start making my own charts in the near future.

And yes, I agree with you that being a wise virgin is a pretty simple and easy thing to accomplish. It starts with praying alone daily, reading scripture alone daily, and if you are fortunate enough to have family reading and praying with them daily. But too many church members have been persuaded that they only need to be baptized and go to church occasionally to be fine.
I have a detailed genealogy from the Bible+Lehites+Jaredites. 300 MB jpeg file. Would you like me to send it to you?

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 11th, 2019, 11:34 pm
by Michelle
Stahura wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:24 pm
Michelle wrote: May 10th, 2019, 10:08 pm It is not the leaders fault if the members don't know the truth.
How?

Follow the Prophet Follow the Prophet Follow the Prophet.

If you misunderstand doctrine it's not the Prophet's fault.


How?

Mathew 15:14
14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
Isaiah 9:16
16 For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed.
Matthew 23:24
24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

How is it that the Lord frequently places blame on the leaders of his people or criticizes them but in 2019 it's never the leaders fault?
If you are a leader and you teach something incorrectly you will have to answer for that. The blind leading the blind BOTH fall in.
You truncated my post when you quoted it.

I explained in it that many members aren't reading the scriptures or praying regularly. This means they are not learning the truth through the standard works and that their ability to feel and hear the Holy Spirit is also diminished.

Where is truth to be found? In two or three witnesses.

The prophet. The scriptures. The Holy Ghost.

If one hasn't read the scriptures and doesn't have the Holy Ghost, the only witness they have is the word of the prophet. And that's if the bothered to listen and watch General Conference.

So many times I have heard people tell "scripture stories" and get them totally wrong because they have only -heard- them at church or told by another. I can't tell you how often I have quoted the scriptures or a prophet and had people not believe me until I show them the scripture or quote.

How often do the members think the prophet is wrong because -they themselves- have not read the scriptures or received a witness by the Holy Spirit.

Let me throw out a few scriptures/principles misunderstandings that I have addressed in just the last week or so:

Common understanding: Christ said, "Judge not." No one should judge another.
Triple witness understanding: Judge a righteous judgement.

https://www.lds.org/manual/gospel-topic ... s?lang=eng
"Sometimes people feel that it is wrong to judge others in any way. While it is true that we should not condemn others or judge them unrighteously, we will need to make judgments of ideas, situations, and people throughout our lives. The Lord has given many commandments that we cannot keep without making judgments. "
These references are approved by the First Presidency and were published in a booklet by the Church stating such under the title "True to the Faith."
JST Matt. 7:1–2 Now these are the words which Jesus taught his disciples that they should say unto the people. Judge not unrighteously, that ye be not judged; but judge righteous judgment.
I have also had this confirmed by my own experience with the Holy Ghost.

Common understanding: Lot offered his daughters to the men of Sodom to protect the men/angels that came to visit him and take him from the city.

Greater understanding by reading the scriptures, including the footnotes and Joseph Smith Translation: Lot -did not- offer his daughters. When he refused to give up the men, the people demanded the daughters as well.
JST Genesis 19:9 And they said unto him, Stand back. And they were angry with him.
10 And they said among themselves, This one man came in to sojourn among us, and he will needs now make himself to be a judge; now we will deal worse with him than with them.
11 Wherefore they said unto the man, We will have the men, and thy daughters also; and we will do with them as seemeth us good.
12 Now this was after the wickedness of Sodom.
13 And Lot said, Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, plead with my brethren that I may not bring them out unto you; and ye shall not do unto them as seemeth good in your eyes;
14 For God will not justify his servant in this thing; wherefore, let me plead with my brethren, this once only, that unto these men ye do nothing, that they may have peace in my house; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
15 And they were angry with Lot and came near to break the door, but the angels of God, which were holy men, put forth their hand and pulled Lot into the house unto them, and shut the door.
I would write more, but I am too tired tonight.

If anyone is interested, reply to this thread and I can share more about things like obedience to the Law of Moses vs. Sadducee's and Pharisees. (New Testament.) Remembering the Law of Moses now, as commanded by Christ. (Check out 3rd Nephi) Why is infertility and inability to nurse babies so rampant in America right now? (Check out Hosea 9 if you are curious to look it up yourself.) And so much more.

OR, I would highly recommend not replying to this post and just reading -ALL-of the scriptures, the words of the prophets that one has available, and listening to the Holy Ghost.

Short of that, the words of the prophets will seem confusing for those that don't have the Holy Ghost and haven't read the scriptures.

Re: What has changed?

Posted: May 12th, 2019, 12:59 am
by eddie
Thinker wrote: May 11th, 2019, 11:25 am Consider someone you may have known who has had bad habits for most of their lives but whenever anyone brings it up, they lash out at them and “shoot the messenger” - whether it be a doctor or a loved one. What generally happens to people who refuse constructive feedback? Unchecked, they get worse or at least continue with dysfunctional behavior. Companies know this and PAY for feedback - positive or negative - so they can improve.

A couple historical examples of how lack of accountability leads to degradation:
  • “Since the first messenger who told Tigranes (King of Armenia) that Lucullus was coming had his head cut off for his pains, no one else would tell him anything, and so he sat in ignorance while the fires of war were already blazing around him, giving ear only to those who flattered him.”
  • “The emperors of the ancient world held an incredible amount of power. Those who ruled over the kingdoms of ancient China were called the sons of Heaven. They were deified men whose every word was to be followed without question. When a whole kingdom follows your every word, it can be hard to stay stable, but it’s easy to fall into a decadent and unstable life.”
Now, remember what has happened to many who provide negative feedback about the church. Is it appreciated, considered and thereby used to “repent” and move closer to the godly mark? No, it is not appreciated because it is not my opinion. Negativity is like a cancer that continues to grow. Or do they “shoot the messenger” by excommunication, or other negative treatment? And once again the irony escapes you, have you been treated negatively because of a negative attitude and constant criticism? And what is the effect - of refusing negative feedback?
The effect of refusing negative feedback is continuing on in Faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ and His chosen leaders.



Image