Page 3 of 3

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 4:57 pm
by marc
I have to wonder how thoughtful the OP was in gathering "facts." Take for example, just one at random:
- Claims a random pile of bones is "Zelph", a former Jaredite
Never did Joseph Smith identify the remains of a Jaredite. This is what happens with careless research and/or intellectual dishonesty. I do mean this sincerely. Regarding the Smithonian "fact," the Smithsonian considers the Book of Mormon a "religious" document and not a scientific guide and has never been used for archaeological research. This does not, however, remotely imply that the institute ever declared it as fiction. There was once a man named Thomas Stuart Ferguson of the New World Archaeological Foundation who called it "fictional," and someone wrote a paper using both organizations to bolster his own conclusions.

Facts are funny things, though. People use them all the time to conflate matters. Lack of evidence; however, is not proof of the contrary. Ancient Romans are said to have crucified thousands of people, yet there is no archaeological proof that such a brutal form of execution ever took place among so many peoples across the Roman Empire; although a few decades ago, the skeletal remains of a man was found with a nail inside his heel bone. Does this mean he was crucified? It's not conclusive. It only means that at one time, a nail was driven through his heel. Facts indeed.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 4:58 pm
by Craig Johnson
thestock wrote: April 25th, 2019, 6:01 am Care to elaborate on which ones are made up?

Let me see how this will go...you will stick to your story that I have made this up and I am stupid and close-minded and then I wont hear from you again. If you read Bushman's biography.....Bushman that is, a practicing Latter-day Saint....not one of those "worldly" sources with an ax to grind........most of what I have stated is found in Rough Stone Rolling. Is a biography from a Harvard researcher who is a Mormon not credible enough for you to be considered a fact? :?
Nah, this is just regurgibles and your real intent is to get someone to look at what you bleep onto the screen and go "omigosh, this is horrible!" If you had been up to date, then MAYBE I would have joined in with some discussion, and if you had been genuine (IMO) then MAYBE I would have thought you were seeking something other than just doing a veiled put down using key-words and key-phrases that throw people off and get them wondering, "geesh, does he actually have a point?" and you really don't have a point. But, this technique has been successful over the years in getting the marginally converted to disaffect. You are certainly not stupid, but closed-minded only you know for sure and I am sure you will probably hear from me again. Since I met my first anti-Mormon in 1974 who was a member of the Reorganized church I have wondered at the need to try to prove us wrong instead of trying to find out if we are right, because if we are right and you did not try your dangedest to find out you will end up in the slacker line.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 5:10 pm
by Mindfields
It's easy to fool a man, but nearly impossible to convince him he's been fooled. --Mark Twain

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 8:09 pm
by marc
Mindfields wrote: April 25th, 2019, 5:10 pm It's easy to fool a man, but nearly impossible to convince him he's been fooled. --Mark Twain
I think it's good that this topic was brought up. We're all at different places in our acquisition of light and knowledge. Because of my own personal studies, I know much more than I did ten years ago. I'm also much closer to my Savior than I was ten years ago. That's for sure! I'm sure the OP will know much more in ten years than he does today as he continues to seek learning. The most important thing is to be honest with one's self, because if one is willing to settle for a certain level of knowledge, that is what one will share, right or wrong. And if one is convinced of his/her ways, one never grows. One will say, I have learned enough. I will go no further. And that is what it means to be damned.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 8:27 pm
by Juliet
A person can barely defend himself while alive these days.

Yes, Joseph Smith was a true prophet.

He prophesied that his name would be known for good and evil.

How to discern? The spirit of truth. When those questions are answered with the Spirit of Truth, and not some other way, then we know the information is correct.

I have a testimony of Joseph Smith. He was a good man. He was a prophet. He went to God when he lacked wisdom, and received the keys to build the Church of Jesus Christ.

Joseph Smith to me is not a character out of a book or time of history. To me, he is a real person. I hope and look forward to seeing him in the first resurrection when Jesus returns.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 9:00 pm
by thestock
marc wrote: April 25th, 2019, 2:37 pm
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 12:27 pm“By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist …” 1 John 4:2-3

DISCLAIMER...(Straw man/Statements of cognitive bias/immaterial concerning the topic of "Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ" )...

So the experiment is this: in light of these facts from the historical record that paint Joseph Smith as an obvious fraud and charlatan, can he be a true prophet because he seems to be obsessed with confessing Jesus Christ to all? Does he pass the test of a prophet based on John 4:2-3 alone?
The OP claims to take no sides, suggesting objectivity and impartiality while supplying subjective statements and descriptions such as "obvious fraud" and "charlatan." I find this "impartial" claim very disingenuous and duplicitous. In any case, regardless of what people believe about Joseph Smith, I will provide quotes, personal writings, and sayings of Joseph Smith, supplied by himself, by scribes, by historians and biographers:
The fundamental principles of our religion are the testimony of the Apostles and Prophets, concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven; and all other things which pertain to our religion are only appendages to it.
I wish I was in a suitable place to tell it, and that I had the trump of an archangel, so that I could tell the story in such a manner that persecution would cease forever. What did Jesus say? (Mark it, Elder Rigdon!) The scriptures inform us that Jesus said, as the Father hath power in himself, even so hath the Son power—to do what? Why, what the Father did. The answer is obvious—in a manner to lay down his body and take it up again. Jesus, what are you going to do? To lay down my life as my Father did, and take it up again. Do you believe it? If you do not believe it you do not believe the Bible.
Who is as holy as He was? Are they to be found? He never transgressed or broke a commandment or law of heaven--no deceit was in His mouth, neither was guile found in His heart.
Surely, then, if it became John and Jesus Christ, the Savior, to fulfil all righteousness to be baptized--so surely, then, it will become every other person that seeks the kingdom of heaven to go and do likewise; for he is the door, and if any person climbs up any other way, the same is a thief and a robber!
None were ever perfect but Jesus; and why was He perfect? because He was the Son of God, and had the fullness of the Spirit, and greater power than any man.
And we know that all men must repent and believe on the name of Jesus Christ, and worship the Father in his name, and endure in faith on his name to the end, or they cannot be saved in the kingdom of God.
Believe on the name of the Lord Jesus, who was on the earth, and is to come, the beginning and the end.
There are more.

The OP asks, "Does he pass the test of a prophet based on John 4:2-3 alone?"

The answer is a resounding yes.
I really appreciate this post. Thank you for sharing.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 9:04 pm
by thestock
Juliet wrote: April 25th, 2019, 8:27 pm A person can barely defend himself while alive these days.

Yes, Joseph Smith was a true prophet.

He prophesied that his name would be known for good and evil.

How to discern? The spirit of truth. When those questions are answered with the Spirit of Truth, and not some other way, then we know the information is correct.

I have a testimony of Joseph Smith. He was a good man. He was a prophet. He went to God when he lacked wisdom, and received the keys to build the Church of Jesus Christ.

Joseph Smith to me is not a character out of a book or time of history. To me, he is a real person. I hope and look forward to seeing him in the first resurrection when Jesus returns.
Out of curiosity do you believe that a person can have the same conviction through feelings about the Quran or Scientology?

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 10:04 pm
by Thinker
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 2:19 pm ...I am simply looking at this experiment as an outsider (i.e. a Christian who has never heard of Mormonism for example) and given what is in the historical record about Joseph Smith asking the question if he can be a true prophet given John and also given what Christ has said "a good tree cannot produce evil fruit and an evil tree cannot produce good fruit." Lots of the stuff on the historical record suggest Joseph Smith was not that great of a guy. Again, just a question......not me trying to break down your faith or anything.
What is scripture? Writings of fallible men about their ideas of spiritual things. Also the Catholic church warped a lot of scripture long before it was in our hands. So, some of what many may think is of God - is really philosophies of men mingled with scripture. Some is of God - but we aren’t spoon fed it - we’ve got to discern.

Reconsider the scripture with that possibility...
  • “every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist …”
Does that make sense? Can someone be anti-Christ just for not saying words?
Consider the name of Jesus Christ. Jesus is latin, and wasn’t Christ’s real name which was Hebrew “Yeshua.” Christos is Greek for “anointed.” Christ is not Jesus’s last name, but what he became and encouraged us to follow him and become. Words don’t matter as much as spirit. And Christ warned against worshipping him. For these reasons & more, that scripture seems more philosophies of men than divine decree.

What’s a prophet? One who sees a vision of a better way and leads people to it. I think that fits Joseph Smith, even though he screwed up. The work he did that continues today is undeniable. He did see a vision and led people to it - & a lot of good fruit resulted. Not all perfect - but pretty good. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same of the rest of the church presidents. I believe a prophet is literally called of God when there’s need & someone answers the call. I see Martin Luther King Jr. also as prophetic.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 10:58 pm
by Craig Johnson
Thinker wrote: April 25th, 2019, 10:04 pm
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 2:19 pm ...I am simply looking at this experiment as an outsider (i.e. a Christian who has never heard of Mormonism for example) and given what is in the historical record about Joseph Smith asking the question if he can be a true prophet given John and also given what Christ has said "a good tree cannot produce evil fruit and an evil tree cannot produce good fruit." Lots of the stuff on the historical record suggest Joseph Smith was not that great of a guy. Again, just a question......not me trying to break down your faith or anything.
What is scripture? Writings of fallible men about their ideas of spiritual things. Also the Catholic church warped a lot of scripture long before it was in our hands. So, some of what many may think is of God - is really philosophies of men mingled with scripture. Some is of God - but we aren’t spoon fed it - we’ve got to discern.

Reconsider the scripture with that possibility...
  • “every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist …”
Does that make sense? Can someone be anti-Christ just for not saying words?
Consider the name of Jesus Christ. Jesus is latin, and wasn’t Christ’s real name which was Hebrew “Yeshua.” Christos is Greek for “anointed.” Christ is not Jesus’s last name, but what he became and encouraged us to follow him and become. Words don’t matter as much as spirit. And Christ warned against worshipping him. For these reasons & more, that scripture seems more philosophies of men than divine decree.

What’s a prophet? One who sees a vision of a better way and leads people to it. I think that fits Joseph Smith, even though he screwed up. The work he did that continues today is undeniable. He did see a vision and led people to it - & a lot of good fruit resulted. Not all perfect - but pretty good. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same of the rest of the church presidents. I believe a prophet is literally called of God when there’s need & someone answers the call. I see Martin Luther King Jr. also as prophetic.
I would like to see what you would have done as a Church President so we could all have a good laugh.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 25th, 2019, 11:00 pm
by Craig Johnson
Mindfields wrote: April 25th, 2019, 5:10 pm It's easy to fool a man, but nearly impossible to convince him he's been fooled. --Mark Twain
Yep.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 26th, 2019, 5:24 am
by Juliet
thestock wrote: April 25th, 2019, 9:04 pm
Juliet wrote: April 25th, 2019, 8:27 pm A person can barely defend himself while alive these days.

Yes, Joseph Smith was a true prophet.

He prophesied that his name would be known for good and evil.

How to discern? The spirit of truth. When those questions are answered with the Spirit of Truth, and not some other way, then we know the information is correct.

I have a testimony of Joseph Smith. He was a good man. He was a prophet. He went to God when he lacked wisdom, and received the keys to build the Church of Jesus Christ.

Joseph Smith to me is not a character out of a book or time of history. To me, he is a real person. I hope and look forward to seeing him in the first resurrection when Jesus returns.
Out of curiosity do you believe that a person can have the same conviction through feelings about the Quran or Scientology?
I have wondered that since I learned about Mohammed when I was in elementary school.

As I have studied Mohammed, probably not as much as I should, but enough to question if his experience was divine, I have concluded that everyone is entitled to worship their own lord. There are principalities and powers out there that do have power. But Jesus Christ is the Lord I worship. He is the one who has overcome the world and the Lord I trust and serve.

I can only speak for myself when it comes to conviction.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 26th, 2019, 6:01 am
by ThePowerofEternity111
Which timeline are ye all discussing, Let it be known the timeline ye now occupy Joseph Smith was real and of the Light, and stands now at peace and joy awaiting the great day of his Lord. Any contradictions or multi-able versions of story's involves timelines, and this is too complicated to explain to mankind in this medium. It must be understood that the LDS itself had to also be saved even as Neo first saved Zion before those plugged into the matrix could have a choice to also be freed. If things were aloud to run a course and in faith it was understood that at end of the book the book could be rewritten, it matterth not if Joseph Smith knew things that would shake members if revealed, it was wisdom reason he kept it to himself. Perhaps the LDS was a insertion to aid in correction of something that was effecting countless worlds, but that the LDS itself had to seem to the Darkness as lost also until the very ending. God ways are not mankind's and the wisdom of God is perfect, let it be as it is and look to the righteousness among all knowledge in world and discern in spirit all things, and humble oneself and admit none of mankind know the full story not even the prophets. There is much I could say that would lead people to great humility but also shake their faith if they got revealed it in spirit, but the time will come many shall realize they knew little to anything at all and the works of the Light the Son and his chosen brethren was what lead all to redemption and salvation.

The truth is beyond all religions on earth yet they contain parts of it, as does all forms of artist expression and works, for God inserteth it within all things as testimony's, even in places of dark for those who need light. Let mankind be cautious of self righteousness, for all plants have their season to ripen and each varies in it fruits, let the harvest decide what is gathered and isn't, but know ye that none shall be forever lost, none who has lived. The world will end in ways none expected, and only certain prophecy's will be fulfilled only those truly of God and what Author decides should remain, and many things will fulfill mysteriously without world knowing it and already are. It is time the children of the earth admit they know little to anything about the universe, and have only based things on beliefs. I tell ye now as a testimony that few has ever communicated to the real HolySpirit of truth. This world is in it last days people must make more effort to align to the Light, it is service to others selfless actions, humility, acting in love of God and others is the key to being ready for what soon comes.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 26th, 2019, 8:15 am
by thestock
Thinker wrote: April 25th, 2019, 10:04 pm
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 2:19 pm ...I am simply looking at this experiment as an outsider (i.e. a Christian who has never heard of Mormonism for example) and given what is in the historical record about Joseph Smith asking the question if he can be a true prophet given John and also given what Christ has said "a good tree cannot produce evil fruit and an evil tree cannot produce good fruit." Lots of the stuff on the historical record suggest Joseph Smith was not that great of a guy. Again, just a question......not me trying to break down your faith or anything.
What is scripture? Writings of fallible men about their ideas of spiritual things. Also the Catholic church warped a lot of scripture long before it was in our hands. So, some of what many may think is of God - is really philosophies of men mingled with scripture. Some is of God - but we aren’t spoon fed it - we’ve got to discern.

Reconsider the scripture with that possibility...
  • “every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist …”
Does that make sense? Can someone be anti-Christ just for not saying words?
Consider the name of Jesus Christ. Jesus is latin, and wasn’t Christ’s real name which was Hebrew “Yeshua.” Christos is Greek for “anointed.” Christ is not Jesus’s last name, but what he became and encouraged us to follow him and become. Words don’t matter as much as spirit. And Christ warned against worshipping him. For these reasons & more, that scripture seems more philosophies of men than divine decree.

What’s a prophet? One who sees a vision of a better way and leads people to it. I think that fits Joseph Smith, even though he screwed up. The work he did that continues today is undeniable. He did see a vision and led people to it - & a lot of good fruit resulted. Not all perfect - but pretty good. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same of the rest of the church presidents. I believe a prophet is literally called of God when there’s need & someone answers the call. I see Martin Luther King Jr. also as prophetic.
Excellent post. This is the sort of response I was hoping I'd see. I agree with pretty much all of this. I even wrote a blog post one day about how I considered Martin Luther King JR to also be a prophet.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 26th, 2019, 2:50 pm
by Contemplator
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 12:27 pm “By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh
is of God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist …” 1 John 4:2-3
...

Here are some facts about Joseph Smith that would suggest he is a false prophet or a deceiver:
...

So the experiment is this: in light of these facts from the historical record that paint Joseph Smith as an obvious fraud and charlatan, can he be a true prophet because he seems to be obsessed with confessing Jesus Christ to all? Does he pass the test of a prophet based on John 4:2-3 alone?
The core question in the OP could be stated as, "Given that Joseph was a fallible human being, how could he be a prophet?"

On 1 John 4:2-3 alone Joseph Smith is obviously a prophet. I cite three examples:

1. Joseph testified, based upon his own visionary experience, that God will answer when we seek to know God and Christ. I have tested this witness from Joseph and found that Joseph Smith was correct, God hears and answers my prayers and I have come to know Jesus as my Savior as a result. Thus, the first vision is evidence of Joseph as a prophet.

2. Joseph Smith gave us the Book of Mormon. He never would talk about the "translation" process. Rather, he said that we can draw closer to God by abiding by the precepts of the Book of Mormon. I have tested this and found that Jospeh was correct. I have learned more about God and Jesus Christ through learning and living the precepts in the Book of Mormon than any other book. Thus, the Book of Mormon is evidence of Joseph as a prophet.

3. Joseph Smith gave us the temple ordinances and invited us to learn how to deepen and enrich our conversation with God, through the veil, in this life. I have had greater revelations of Jesus Christ through participation in temple ordinances. The temple ordinances are evidence of Joseph as a prophet.

Whatever else Joseph may have done, these three things that came through Joseph Smith have been an important part of my learning about, and experience of, Jesus Christ. So, based upon 1 John 4:2-3 Joseph is a prophet.

The problem with the question posed in the OP is that it suggests that Joseph's fallibility precludes him from being a prophet. An incorrect premise. Recall that the Psalms are attributed to David. If I understand the history, David was a prophet as well as a man who tried to cover his adultery with murder. Yet, Jesus quoted more from Psalms than from any other book of the Old Testament. Prophets have lead very human, very flawed, lives. We should never expect a perfect life from a prophet. Yet, we should expect God to send His word through these prophets.

Just a note about the list of "facts." I cannot address all of the statements here, but let me give an example of the less than careful statement of the "facts." One example is the temple ceremony. The list in the OP said, "Temple Ceremony taken directly from Free Mason initiation ceremony." While there are elements of the endowment ceremony that appear to be similar to, or taken from, masonic practices, it appears clear that the ceremony was not lifted directly from the masonic rites. A good article on this can be found at https://www.fairmormon.org/conference/a ... reemasonry .

There are many more of the "facts" that are not carefully stated. Thus, while related to recorded history, the OP often misstates the historical record. Thus, the need to check sources.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 26th, 2019, 3:24 pm
by harakim
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 2:19 pm
harakim wrote: April 24th, 2019, 2:17 pm
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 12:27 pm - Organizes Zion's Camp which turns out to be a disastrous failure with the camp stricken with Cholera (why didnt he learn by revelation that boiling their water could have avoided it?)
So you're one of those prosperity gospel types... everything is going to go perfectly right if you're doing what you're supposed to?

I know one person who would disagree:
Spoiler
Image
No I am not personally one of those. As I stated in my post, I am not taking a pro or con position. I am simply looking at this experiment as an outsider (i.e. a Christian who has never heard of Mormonism for example) and given what is in the historical record about Joseph Smith asking the question if he can be a true prophet given John and also given what Christ has said "a good tree cannot produce evil fruit and an evil tree cannot produce good fruit." Lots of the stuff on the historical record suggest Joseph Smith was not that great of a guy. Again, just a question......not me trying to break down your faith or anything.

So it's your hypothetical outsider who is the prosperity gospel type...

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 26th, 2019, 3:33 pm
by innocentoldguy
These are the same tired old arguments that have been floating around for over 100 years. I'll give my opinions on each inline with your commentary.
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 12:27 pm - Claimed he could locate buried treasure using a stone and was tried in court over it

If he could, why didn't he ever do it? Even if he could, so?

- Began telling the stories of the Nephite and Lamanite people in such great details "as if he had lived amongst them his whole life" years before claiming to have recovered Golden plates

So? We know that it took him four years to get to the point where he could get the plates and we also know that he received instruction during that time. Who can say that part of that preparation wasn't visions of what he was going to be translating?

- Varying claims of the plates experience: 1) he found the plates using the seer stone, 2) the plates were guarded by a spirit named Nephi, 3) in the later versions Nephi becomes Moroni instead and he is shown the location of the plates rather than finding them with his stone
Please give citations for 1 and 2.

- Claims to translate the plates and uses the same method previously used to deceive people in the money digging ventures

So? There are plenty of stories in the Bible of people using objects and symbols to strengthen their faith (e.g. fleece). It shouldn't be a surprise that God would interact with Joseph in a similar way.

- After losing the 116 pages, and knowing he could not dictate them again verbatim, he claims evil men would "change" them (an odd claim, since being unable to reproduce an ancient text if using the power of God seems more likely to discredit) so proceeds to dictate an alternate version from the perspective of an alternate character instead

He clearly said that even if he did translate them verbatim, those who took the pages would change them and use that to attempt to discredit him. Seems a legitimate concern, considering what was going on at the time.

- Raises money in a fraudulent banking venture that goes bust after 1 month....he is wanted for fraud in 2 states and flees to avoid prosecution
Please show where he was convicted of any wrongdoing.

- About 20% of the Book of Mormon is simply copied from the Bible verbatim, including original errors contained in the KJV

And some of it contains Biblical passages (e.g. Isaiah) that weren't known in his time and were only discovered later. Also, if the stick of Judah and stick of Joseph are to be twin testimonies of Christ, it only makes sense that they would be vastly similar.

- Other BOM doctrines (i.e. Satan can appear as an angel of light) are taken directly from the Bible

Shouldn't that be the case?

- Main plot and setting of the Book of Mormon taken directly from the contemporary View of the Hebrews

Yeah, only it isn't. Try reading View of the Hebrews.

- Temple Ceremony taken directly from Free Mason initiation ceremony

And where did the Mason ceremony come from again?

- Claims to translate the Book of Abraham, "written by Abraham's own hand on papyrus"....the translation is shown to be bogus as the original scroll is a funerary text dated to 100 BC (why would an Egyptian mummy be buried with the contemporary journal of a Hebrew anyway?)

Hugh Nibley addressed this quite well in a couple of his books.

- Like modern leaders with the Hoffman scandal....Smith was unable to detect an obvious fraud and claims to translate portions of the bogus Kinderhook plates

Actually, there is a newspaper article about that incident and according to the guy that wrote the article, Joseph took the Kinderhook plates, opened up an Egyptian dictionary he carried around with him, and basically said, "I can't read these, but this L-shaped character means it was written by Ham." Hardly prophetic.

- Practices polygamy and polyandry in secret from Emma and the public, including marriage to teenagers as young as 14, and on occasion telling some that accepting plural marriage to him would ensure their salvation in the celestial kingdom, and claiming to others that rejecting it will bring his swift death at the hands of an angel via a flaming sword

There's no evidence that Joseph had sex with most of these people and there's plenty of evidence that he was doing "eternity only" sealings in order to abide by the commandment of plural marriage without actually doing it. According to church history, the angel with the sword appeared to him and threatened him with destruction if he didn't knock it off and start following the command correctly.

- time and again turns on his closest friends and associates, including apostles and first presidency members, calling them vile, evil, and not to be trusted or associated with....after such individuals raised objections to certain of his shady activities.

In all fairness, they turned on him first.

- Destroyed a printing press that was alerting the public to his polygamy (and this is the cause of his arrest and eventual death)

And?

- The Book of Abraham seems to be taken directly from the Apocalypse of Abraham, just like he took View of the Hebrews and just like he took the Mason ceremony and made them his creations

Yeah, only it isn't.

- Claims a random pile of bones is "Zelph", a former Jaredite

And?

- Organizes Zion's Camp which turns out to be a disastrous failure with the camp stricken with Cholera (why didnt he learn by revelation that boiling their water could have avoided it?)

Was it a failure? Look at everything that group learned from the experience.

- Claims temple in Missouri would be built in his lifetime (it still isnt built)

And?

-No physical evidence for BOM exists at all, from coinage to weapons of war, to animals, to evidences of the large civilizations and wars (in some cases where 2 million people died in one battle).....there is absolutely ZERO evidence for any of it and the Smithsonian Institute has declared the BOM a work of fiction.

That's not accurate. The Smithsonian Institute said that the Book of Mormon is a religious book and not a scientific guide and that their archaeologists have never used it as a scientific guide. That is MUCH different than what you just said.

- Gave conflicting accounts of his first vision. Some include seeing just the Lord, others include seeing God and Christ together, some include the emphasis being that his sins are forgiven, later the emphasis is that all churches are false and he is a chosen vessel. No actual account is given before 1838.

You try giving verbal accounts of a 20-year-old event months or years apart and see how many variations you come up with.

So the experiment is this: in light of these facts from the historical record that paint Joseph Smith as an obvious fraud and charlatan, can he be a true prophet because he seems to be obsessed with confessing Jesus Christ to all? Does he pass the test of a prophet based on John 4:2-3 alone?

Same tired argument from anti-mormons for over 100 years. Yawn! You either have faith or you don't. That's all there is to it. You will never find proof of the gospel and that is by celestial design.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 26th, 2019, 5:20 pm
by Kris17
Instead of picking on each other, how about supporting what you feel able, and taking the rest off to your own private explorations/prayer time and really test it.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: April 28th, 2019, 7:22 am
by thestock
Contemplator wrote: April 26th, 2019, 2:50 pm
thestock wrote: April 24th, 2019, 12:27 pm “By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh
is of God, and every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist …” 1 John 4:2-3
...

Here are some facts about Joseph Smith that would suggest he is a false prophet or a deceiver:
...

So the experiment is this: in light of these facts from the historical record that paint Joseph Smith as an obvious fraud and charlatan, can he be a true prophet because he seems to be obsessed with confessing Jesus Christ to all? Does he pass the test of a prophet based on John 4:2-3 alone?
The core question in the OP could be stated as, "Given that Joseph was a fallible human being, how could he be a prophet?"

On 1 John 4:2-3 alone Joseph Smith is obviously a prophet. I cite three examples:

1. Joseph testified, based upon his own visionary experience, that God will answer when we seek to know God and Christ. I have tested this witness from Joseph and found that Joseph Smith was correct, God hears and answers my prayers and I have come to know Jesus as my Savior as a result. Thus, the first vision is evidence of Joseph as a prophet.

2. Joseph Smith gave us the Book of Mormon. He never would talk about the "translation" process. Rather, he said that we can draw closer to God by abiding by the precepts of the Book of Mormon. I have tested this and found that Jospeh was correct. I have learned more about God and Jesus Christ through learning and living the precepts in the Book of Mormon than any other book. Thus, the Book of Mormon is evidence of Joseph as a prophet.

3. Joseph Smith gave us the temple ordinances and invited us to learn how to deepen and enrich our conversation with God, through the veil, in this life. I have had greater revelations of Jesus Christ through participation in temple ordinances. The temple ordinances are evidence of Joseph as a prophet.

Whatever else Joseph may have done, these three things that came through Joseph Smith have been an important part of my learning about, and experience of, Jesus Christ. So, based upon 1 John 4:2-3 Joseph is a prophet.

The problem with the question posed in the OP is that it suggests that Joseph's fallibility precludes him from being a prophet. An incorrect premise. Recall that the Psalms are attributed to David. If I understand the history, David was a prophet as well as a man who tried to cover his adultery with murder. Yet, Jesus quoted more from Psalms than from any other book of the Old Testament. Prophets have lead very human, very flawed, lives. We should never expect a perfect life from a prophet. Yet, we should expect God to send His word through these prophets.

Just a note about the list of "facts." I cannot address all of the statements here, but let me give an example of the less than careful statement of the "facts." One example is the temple ceremony. The list in the OP said, "Temple Ceremony taken directly from Free Mason initiation ceremony." While there are elements of the endowment ceremony that appear to be similar to, or taken from, masonic practices, it appears clear that the ceremony was not lifted directly from the masonic rites. A good article on this can be found at https://www.fairmormon.org/conference/a ... reemasonry .

There are many more of the "facts" that are not carefully stated. Thus, while related to recorded history, the OP often misstates the historical record. Thus, the need to check sources.
Thank you. Love this post.

Re: Joseph Smith's emphasis on Jesus Christ (an experiment)

Posted: February 9th, 2020, 11:33 pm
by hippypink
If you look for historical evidence that something is false, you will find it.
If you look for historical evidence that something is true, you will find it.

Therefore, all are biased and limited by available, and always disputable, evidence.

P.S. There is not history, only historians.