Page 8 of 9

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 10:26 am
by Thinker
Craig Johnson wrote: April 14th, 2019, 10:01 am
Thinker wrote: April 14th, 2019, 9:40 am
Craig Johnson wrote: April 13th, 2019, 1:30 pm
topcat wrote: April 13th, 2019, 12:28 pm I believe he is a prophet, seer, and revelator by virtue of his calling, but not by any gifts given to him from God.
Well, that just doesn't add up does it? What on earth do you know about the gifts he is given from God? Absolutely nothing. Zilch.
“By their fruits ye shall know them.”
A prophet of God, using the name of Jesus Christ, would never take from the poor, hide finances and other corruption dealing with sacred funds.
If you believe that you really are lost. If you don't believe it and are just pushing lies to disaffect people, you will have your day. You shame yourself lying on good people and on a good organization.
Who’s lying, Craig?
If I stated anything that is not true - point it out - specifically.
What exactly did I state that is not true?
Since you haven’t done so, it seems you are the one who’s accountable for denying truth and trying to shoot the messenger because you take the truth to be hard.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 10:29 am
by Craig Johnson
Lizzy60 wrote: April 14th, 2019, 10:25 am
Craig Johnson wrote: April 14th, 2019, 10:04 am
Obrien wrote: April 14th, 2019, 9:25 am ponderized
Thank you, I am always looking for new words, I plan on using that!
Did you really miss the "Ponderize" scandal?

https://www.standard.net/update-devin-d ... 45617.html

https://kutv.com/news/local/lds-church- ... se-website

https://universe.byu.edu/2015/10/07/gen ... e-website/
Oh, well, I am not offended.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 10:34 am
by Craig Johnson
Thinker wrote: April 14th, 2019, 10:26 am
Craig Johnson wrote: April 14th, 2019, 10:01 am
Thinker wrote: April 14th, 2019, 9:40 am
Craig Johnson wrote: April 13th, 2019, 1:30 pm

Well, that just doesn't add up does it? What on earth do you know about the gifts he is given from God? Absolutely nothing. Zilch.
“By their fruits ye shall know them.”
A prophet of God, using the name of Jesus Christ, would never take from the poor, hide finances and other corruption dealing with sacred funds.
If you believe that you really are lost. If you don't believe it and are just pushing lies to disaffect people, you will have your day. You shame yourself lying on good people and on a good organization.
Who’s lying, Craig?
If I stated anything that is not true - point it out - specifically.
What exactly did I state that is not true?
Since you haven’t done so, it seems you are the one who’s accountable for denying truth and trying to shoot the messenger because you take the truth to be hard.
Let me just bundle it for you, you did not say anything that is true. The church does not "take" anything, you know that. The church does not "hide" finances, the churches finances are not your business, who do you think you are? Oh, that's right, you think you are Gideon. And "other" corruption, you have not proven any corruption, what's this other corruption? Man, hold the mirror to your face.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 10:48 am
by topcat
Craig Johnson wrote: April 14th, 2019, 10:04 am
Obrien wrote: April 14th, 2019, 9:25 am ponderized
Thank you, I am always looking for new words, I plan on using that!
I see that you thanked OBrien for his post, and I would too. But it looks like you're not picking up on his little bit of tongue-in-cheekness.

He spoke truth. If you're a member and you're not in line with the correlated material or official narrative, then you are considered apostate.

Such tolerance from above, wouldn't everybody agree?!

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 11:17 am
by Thinker
Craig, I think you missed all that was in the “spoiler.” Maybe you’re using the older forum style that doesn’t show it, so I’ll repost it openly for you, below...
Craig Johnson wrote: April 13th, 2019, 1:30 pm Well, that just doesn't add up does it? What on earth do you know about the gifts he is given from God? Absolutely nothing. Zilch.
“By their fruits ye shall know them.”
A prophet of God, using the name of Jesus Christ, would never take from the poor, hide finances and other corruption dealing with sacred funds.

Financial irresponsibility (which contribute to debt, bankruptcy, poverty and related suffering) is undeniable. Changing scripture from what it states (increase) to mean “income” to get more money, is not of Christ. The reason God commanded tithe be based on increase is shown in the following example:
  • 2 men earn the exact same income amount.
    1 man is the sole provider of a family of 7 and after paying bills has no increase left.
    2nd man lives with his parents who pay all his bills, so all of his income is increase.
    Yet, the church demand$ the $ame amount from each man - thereby causing the 1st family to be poor. Christ was about alleviating poverty and suffering - not causing more.
Deuteronomy 14:28-29 (conveniently ignored in lds curriculums) states that tithing collectors are to give at least 1/3 of TITHES to those in need. Christ asked those who can, to give much more.

While we are often pressured and shamed into giving “honest tithes,” church leaders keep money dark and secret, though Oaks did admit no tithes go to the poor. Funds intended for the poor go to the corporate empire of mormon leaders and we have no clue or say in how it’s spent. We do know the church had some elaborate malls built, and a list of greedy wordly companies using the name of Jesus Christ in vain. Meanwhile, about 1,000,000,000 of our brothers and sisters are starving. Who do TITHES belong to? God. And how do we love God? By loving the least of these.

Grand ribon-cutting opening by for another mall (at least 2 now) built using the name of Jesus Christ...
Image

Image

Image

Even if you designated fast offerings - the church leaders now say it’s their money and they can use it as they want...

Image

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 11:52 am
by Fiannan
How many people are employed by the mall, directly and indirectly? I think we make a big mistake thinking that if we hand out charity we are doing more than free enterprise can do to lift up the poor. Of course, run-away capitalism can be harmful as well, but in a Adam Smith context...

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 12:21 pm
by Thinker
Fiannan wrote: April 14th, 2019, 11:52 am How many people are employed by the mall, directly and indirectly? I think we make a big mistake thinking that if we hand out charity we are doing more than free enterprise can do to lift up the poor. Of course, run-away capitalism can be harmful as well, but in a Adam Smith context...
Let’s pretend Christ would rather give jobs to work in shopping malls than helping those who are starving to death. Why doesn’t the church give jobs by expanding their corporate empire in Ethiopia - or another country stricken with extreme poverty?

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 14th, 2019, 3:50 pm
by Craig Johnson
Thinker wrote: April 14th, 2019, 11:17 am Craig, I think you missed all that was in the “spoiler.”
Oh no, not at all,
Perhaps you think you have higher thoughts than this man:
"Mark 12:41 And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much.
42 And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.
43 And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury:
44 For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living."
Try as I may I did not find the part where He commanded them to give her money back, maybe that type of money makes more of a difference than people with vision like ours can see?
Maybe trying to phrase things as virulently as you can with pictures of starving children and tithing slips with new instructions that have nothing to do with the subject coupled with your accusatory opinions really is not the right way to look at things?
I have to wonder again who you really think that you are and what you think that you know? You ain't a prophet, you are just a person who wants to sow contention and discord because you are bitter. I ain't bitter, all I want to do is lead someone to the truth that makes my every day a joyful learning experience, as long as I keep my head on straight, ignore all the negative voices and press on doing everything I can to keep the spirit with me. Rather than trying to tear down people and organizations that are good, and that certainly do more good than you do with your deceitful rhetoric.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 15th, 2019, 9:56 am
by I AM
MMbelieve wrote: April 9th, 2019, 1:25 pm Are people considered anti towards the teachings of Christ or simply the church organization?

If its just the church organization they are anti towards, then it begs to question why are they putting so much emphasis on attacking or fault finding the church?
Is it a warning?
Sense of betrayal?
Pride?
Desire for it to be more pure?

I can see two types of “antis” as they have been called...One that is mourning an increasingly imperfect church body and the other who has become bitter about an increasingly imperfect church body. Which brings the thought back to Eyrings priesthood talk. Those who criticize instead of sustain experience some negative consequences (bitterness?). And darkness.

Expressing concern is okay! Expressing questions is okay! Expressing doubt is okay! Expressing these things with no concern for the qualities of respect, love, humility and decency is not going to come across well or be received well. THIS is what has grown to be a problem on this forum. The respect for the leaders of the church, the sustaining of who has been called has been set aside just the same as society has set them aside in our everyday lives.

I respect person A
I dont respect person B
Each person said the same phrase or did the same deed that doesnt sit well with me...
I mention it to both but my words and tone and attitude will be different for person A than person B

How we speak our concerns determines and shows our attitude and if we have basic respect or if that has been cast aside.

My question is why do we expect so much from others than we do of ourselves?

Those who think poorly of the leaders need to exercise some self reflection and humility and ponder on how they themselves would hope to be received if they were a leader of the church. Would they really be able to do better? Be more holy? Have less weaknesses? Receive revelation more frequently and the “good stuff”, the meat? Could they handle the responsibility? How would they handle not being able to satisfy the many voices crying out to them with all different requests and demands.

My belief is that once we allow ourselves to have unsettled doubts or questions for a prolonged period of time, the adversary sets in and its a downward journey until we decide to shut up with our own beliefs and senses of entitlement (humble ourselves) and reground in the basic truths and submit to them. If we fail to self correct our “humanness” then we can become anti against the bassic doctrines of salvation.
---------------
you said:
"If its just the church organization they are anti towards, then it begs to question why are they putting so much emphasis on attacking or fault finding the church?
Is it a warning?
Sense of betrayal?
Pride?
Desire for it to be more pure?"
more like wanting to find the truth and putting Christ and His words first.
----------------------------------------------
is that all your little imagination can conjure up ?
maybe there's just a little bit better reason for it than what you think.
Members like you, think that members like me speak the way we do and bad about the church because of ridiculous reasons like you listed.
You think we just have some sort of grudge against the church and want to find fault and any excuse to cut down the church and it's leaders any way we can.
YOU ARE VERY VERY WRONG !

it's so sad that so many members like you care more about being true to the phrase "follow the prophet",
and care more about the church and it's leaders, than they do Jesus Christ and His words.

They still want to believe "all is well is Zion" despite the fact that the scriptures say otherwise,
and are full of warnings for us, and in fact show our apostasy.
But members don't want to see it, because they don't want to believe it, even if it is true.

The ONLY REASON I believe the way I do, and say the things I do is because
I choose to put Christ first - not the church or it's leaders.
I put Christ's words and our scriptures above EVERYTHING ELSE.
So most of the time it's actually not even me that is saying these things
and giving these warnings to us, it's Christ and great prophets in our scriptures,
like Isaiah that Jesus mentions.
And when Christ says something, and especially when He gives us a commandment
to do something, we had better DO IT !
WHY DID THE LORD HIMSELF SAY

"for great are the words of Isaiah" and
gave us a commandment that we "search these things diligently"

3 Nephi 23:1- 4
1 "And now, behold, I say unto you,
that ye ought to search these things.
Yea, a commandment I give unto
you that ye search these things diligently;
for great are the words of Isaiah."


I wonder why the Lord has commanded us to -
"search these things diligently; for great are the words of Isaiah."
because it reveals the follies of the church.

So believing in Christ and following Him - and not anyone else, and following His commandment
of "search these things diligently" the words of Isaiah,
if in many scriptures in Isaiah, like below where Isaiah compares the leaders of the church
to "dumb watchdogs", you can see why I speak the way I do about the church and leaders.
It's not me that is saying it, I'm only quoting Isaiah, Christ, and other prophets in our scriptures.

"Typifying the leaders of Jehovah’s people who make a Covenant with Death instead of a Covenant of Life (Isaiah 28:15, 18), or Jehovah’s wife who turns adulterous (Isaiah 1:21; 50:1), are certain “watchmen”—prophets and seers—who occupy the highest rung of society. Because they epitomize “dumb watchdogs” and “lolling seers,”


viewtopic.php?f=14&t=49985&p=895227&hil ... ah#p895227


"Why did Christ tell us to study Isaiah?"

because it brings out the follies of the church and it's leaders,
"the drunkards of Ephraim!" and condemns them.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=50784&p=915512&hili ... ah#p915512



viewtopic.php?f=2&t=51039

Isaiah 56

9 All you wild beasts, you animals of the forest,
come and devour!
10 Their watchmen are altogether blind and unaware;
all of them are but dumb watchdogs unable to bark,
lolling seers fond of slumber.

Typifying the leaders of Jehovah’s people who make a Covenant with Death instead of a Covenant of Life (Isaiah 28:15, 18), or Jehovah’s wife who turns adulterous (Isaiah 1:21; 50:1), are certain “watchmen”—prophets and seers—who occupy the highest rung of society. Because they epitomize “dumb watchdogs” and “lolling seers,” Jehovah replaces them with a righteous watchman—his servant—and other watchmen: “Go and appoint a watchman who reports what he sees” (Isaiah 21:6); “I have appointed watchmen on your walls, O Jerusalem, who shall not be silent day or night” (Isaiah 62:6).

As the job of Jehovah’s watchmen is to report to his people what they see and hear (Isaiah 21:10; 48:16), those who are blind and unaware see and hear little of consequence and fail to warn his people: “Who is blind but my own servant, or so deaf as the messenger I have sent? Who is blind like those I have commissioned, as uncomprehending as the servant of Jehovah—seeing much but not giving heed, with open ears hearing nothing?” (Isaiah 42:19-20. The final fate of the blind watchmen, literally and figuratively, is to be devoured by wild beasts—a covenant curse (Isaiah 5:29; 15:9; 51:8).

11 Gluttonous dogs, and insatiable,
such indeed are insensible shepherds.
They are all diverted to their own way,
every one after his own advantage.
12 Come, they say, let us get wine
and have our fill of liquor.
For tomorrow will be like today, only far better!

Instead of portraying these watchmen as ones who feed and protect the flock (Isaiah 5:17; 40:11; 63:11), the imagery of shepherds as dogs characterizes them as predators and unclean animals (Psalm 22:16; 1 Kings 14:11; Matthew 7:6). Instead of warning of trouble as Jehovah’s Day of Judgment approaches, they resemble wanton herdsmen who scatter the sheep and feed themselves off the fattest (Jeremiah 23:1-2; 50:6-7; Ezekiel 34:1-8). Instead of serving as proxy saviors to Jehovah’s people under the terms of the Davidic Covenant (Isaiah 37:35; 63:17; 65:8), they look out for themselves.

Word links round out the shepherds’ recriminatory state: “These too have indulged in wine and are giddy with strong drink: priests and prophets have gone astray through liquor. They are intoxicated with wine and stagger because of strong drink; they err as seers, they blunder in their decisions” (Isaiah 28:7); “Procrastinate, and become bewildered; preoccupy yourselves, until you cry for help. Be drunk, but not with wine; stagger, but not from strong drink. Jehovah has poured out on you a spirit of deep sleep: he has shut your eyes, the prophets; he has covered your heads, the seers” (Isaiah 29:9-10).


viewtopic.php?f=14&t=51328&p=926594&hil ... rs#p926594

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 15th, 2019, 10:06 am
by topcat
I AM wrote: April 15th, 2019, 9:56 am
MMbelieve wrote: April 9th, 2019, 1:25 pm Are people considered anti towards the teachings of Christ or simply the church organization?

If its just the church organization they are anti towards, then it begs to question why are they putting so much emphasis on attacking or fault finding the church?
Is it a warning?
Sense of betrayal?
Pride?
Desire for it to be more pure?

I can see two types of “antis” as they have been called...One that is mourning an increasingly imperfect church body and the other who has become bitter about an increasingly imperfect church body. Which brings the thought back to Eyrings priesthood talk. Those who criticize instead of sustain experience some negative consequences (bitterness?). And darkness.

Expressing concern is okay! Expressing questions is okay! Expressing doubt is okay! Expressing these things with no concern for the qualities of respect, love, humility and decency is not going to come across well or be received well. THIS is what has grown to be a problem on this forum. The respect for the leaders of the church, the sustaining of who has been called has been set aside just the same as society has set them aside in our everyday lives.

I respect person A
I dont respect person B
Each person said the same phrase or did the same deed that doesnt sit well with me...
I mention it to both but my words and tone and attitude will be different for person A than person B

How we speak our concerns determines and shows our attitude and if we have basic respect or if that has been cast aside.

My question is why do we expect so much from others than we do of ourselves?

Those who think poorly of the leaders need to exercise some self reflection and humility and ponder on how they themselves would hope to be received if they were a leader of the church. Would they really be able to do better? Be more holy? Have less weaknesses? Receive revelation more frequently and the “good stuff”, the meat? Could they handle the responsibility? How would they handle not being able to satisfy the many voices crying out to them with all different requests and demands.

My belief is that once we allow ourselves to have unsettled doubts or questions for a prolonged period of time, the adversary sets in and its a downward journey until we decide to shut up with our own beliefs and senses of entitlement (humble ourselves) and reground in the basic truths and submit to them. If we fail to self correct our “humanness” then we can become anti against the bassic doctrines of salvation.
---------------
you said:
"If its just the church organization they are anti towards, then it begs to question why are they putting so much emphasis on attacking or fault finding the church?
Is it a warning?
Sense of betrayal?
Pride?
Desire for it to be more pure?"
more like wanting to find the truth and putting Christ and His words first.
----------------------------------------------
is that all your little imagination can conjure up ?
maybe there's just a little bit better reason for it than what you think.
Members like you, think that members like me speak bad of the church and way we do
because of ridiculous reasons like you listed.
You think we just have some sort of grudge against the church and want to find fault and
any excuse to cut down the church and it's leaders any way we can.
YOU ARE VERY VERY WRONG !

it's so sad that so many members like you care more about being true to the phrase "follow the prophet",
and care more about the church and it's leaders, than they do Jesus Christ and His words.

They still want to believe "all is well is Zion" despite the fact that the scriptures say otherwise,
and are full of warnings for us, and in fact show our apostasy.
But members don't want to see it, because they don't want to believe it, even if it was true.

The ONLY REASON I believe the way I do, and say the things I do is because
I choose to put Christ first - not the church or it's leaders.
I put Christ's words and our scriptures above EVERYTHING ELSE.
So most of the time it's actually not even me that is saying these things
and giving these warnings to us, it's Christ and great prophets in our scriptures,
like Isaiah that Jesus mentions.
And when Christ says something, and especially when He gives us a commandment
to do something, we had better DO IT !
WHY DID THE LORD HIMSELF SAY

"for great are the words of Isaiah" and
gave us a commandment that we "search these things diligently"

3 Nephi 23:1- 4
1 "And now, behold, I say unto you,
that ye ought to search these things.
Yea, a commandment I give unto
you that ye search these things diligently;
for great are the words of Isaiah."


I wonder why the Lord has commanded us to -
"search these things diligently; for great are the words of Isaiah."
because it reveals the follies of the church.

So believing in Christ and following Him - and not anyone else, and following His commandment
of "search these things diligently" the words of Isaiah,
if in many scriptures in Isaiah, like below where Isaiah compares the leaders of the church
to "dumb watchdogs", you can see why I speak the way I do about the church and leaders.
It's not me that is saying it, I'm only quoting Isaiah, Christ, and other prophets in our scriptures.

Typifying the leaders of Jehovah’s people who make a Covenant with Death instead of a Covenant of Life (Isaiah 28:15, 18), or Jehovah’s wife who turns adulterous (Isaiah 1:21; 50:1), are certain “watchmen”—prophets and seers—who occupy the highest rung of society. Because they epitomize “dumb watchdogs” and “lolling seers,”


viewtopic.php?f=14&t=49985&p=895227&hil ... ah#p895227


"Why did Christ tell us to study Isaiah?"

because it brings out the follies of the church and it's leaders,
"the drunkards of Ephraim!" and condemns them.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=50784&p=915512&hili ... ah#p915512



viewtopic.php?f=2&t=51039

Isaiah 56

9 All you wild beasts, you animals of the forest,
come and devour!
10 Their watchmen are altogether blind and unaware;
all of them are but dumb watchdogs unable to bark,
lolling seers fond of slumber.

Typifying the leaders of Jehovah’s people who make a Covenant with Death instead of a Covenant of Life (Isaiah 28:15, 18), or Jehovah’s wife who turns adulterous (Isaiah 1:21; 50:1), are certain “watchmen”—prophets and seers—who occupy the highest rung of society. Because they epitomize “dumb watchdogs” and “lolling seers,” Jehovah replaces them with a righteous watchman—his servant—and other watchmen: “Go and appoint a watchman who reports what he sees” (Isaiah 21:6); “I have appointed watchmen on your walls, O Jerusalem, who shall not be silent day or night” (Isaiah 62:6).

As the job of Jehovah’s watchmen is to report to his people what they see and hear (Isaiah 21:10; 48:16), those who are blind and unaware see and hear little of consequence and fail to warn his people: “Who is blind but my own servant, or so deaf as the messenger I have sent? Who is blind like those I have commissioned, as uncomprehending as the servant of Jehovah—seeing much but not giving heed, with open ears hearing nothing?” (Isaiah 42:19-20. The final fate of the blind watchmen, literally and figuratively, is to be devoured by wild beasts—a covenant curse (Isaiah 5:29; 15:9; 51:8).

11 Gluttonous dogs, and insatiable,
such indeed are insensible shepherds.
They are all diverted to their own way,
every one after his own advantage.
12 Come, they say, let us get wine
and have our fill of liquor.
For tomorrow will be like today, only far better!

Instead of portraying these watchmen as ones who feed and protect the flock (Isaiah 5:17; 40:11; 63:11), the imagery of shepherds as dogs characterizes them as predators and unclean animals (Psalm 22:16; 1 Kings 14:11; Matthew 7:6). Instead of warning of trouble as Jehovah’s Day of Judgment approaches, they resemble wanton herdsmen who scatter the sheep and feed themselves off the fattest (Jeremiah 23:1-2; 50:6-7; Ezekiel 34:1-8). Instead of serving as proxy saviors to Jehovah’s people under the terms of the Davidic Covenant (Isaiah 37:35; 63:17; 65:8), they look out for themselves.

Word links round out the shepherds’ recriminatory state: “These too have indulged in wine and are giddy with strong drink: priests and prophets have gone astray through liquor. They are intoxicated with wine and stagger because of strong drink; they err as seers, they blunder in their decisions” (Isaiah 28:7); “Procrastinate, and become bewildered; preoccupy yourselves, until you cry for help. Be drunk, but not with wine; stagger, but not from strong drink. Jehovah has poured out on you a spirit of deep sleep: he has shut your eyes, the prophets; he has covered your heads, the seers” (Isaiah 29:9-10).


viewtopic.php?f=14&t=51328&p=926594&hil ... rs#p926594
Hard to murmur against all those scriptures that you quoted.

And yet the mainstream rebuttal is that those scriptures don't apply to the leadership. You are interpreting them wrongly. You have an axe to grind and you are in need of repentance if you are challenging those with the keys.

Other than that, the other rebuttal is that you are angry and petty, or it's your "approach" and your attitude.

Or finally, they will say that the scriptures that you are quoting don't say what they say they say. They will try to gaslight you.

But virtually never will the mainstream member actually try to apply those scriptures and see the evidence that proves those scriptures have been fulfilled and are being fulfilled in our day.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 15th, 2019, 2:07 pm
by Thinker
Craig,
Christ was also called names and predicted that those who taught what he taught, would be hated as you seem to hate me.

Notice how Christ looked on the heart of people - whether they gave a lot or just a widow’s mite. And notice that Christ realized she was giving money to religious leaders who would torture & kill Christ - but he focused on her good heart, even if she didn’t realize their evil.

It’s so sad to see even the temple corrupted. Its not completely corrupted - some godly aspects still - yet, somewhat - especially financially. In our church, in order to get a recommend to enter the temple, you must pay - even if you’re poor - a lot of MONEY. Members are being charged for worthiness - even OVER-charged (income rather than increase). Imagine what Christ would do if he could see how temples are being used to make money...

Image

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 15th, 2019, 11:18 pm
by Craig Johnson
Thinker wrote: April 15th, 2019, 2:07 pm Craig,
Christ was also called names and predicted that those who taught what he taught, would be hated as you seem to hate me.

Notice how Christ looked on the heart of people - whether they gave a lot or just a widow’s mite. And notice that Christ realized she was giving money to religious leaders who would torture & kill Christ - but he focused on her good heart, even if she didn’t realize their evil.

It’s so sad to see even the temple corrupted. Its not completely corrupted - some godly aspects still - yet, somewhat - especially financially. In our church, in order to get a recommend to enter the temple, you must pay - even if you’re poor - a lot of MONEY. Members are being charged for worthiness - even OVER-charged (income rather than increase). Imagine what Christ would do if he could see how temples are being used to make money...
Let's see how to reply to this, whatever it is, without getting another warning from the BOARD. Nope, can't think of anything.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 15th, 2019, 11:30 pm
by drtanner
Thinker wrote: April 15th, 2019, 2:07 pm Craig,
Christ was also called names and predicted that those who taught what he taught, would be hated as you seem to hate me.

Notice how Christ looked on the heart of people - whether they gave a lot or just a widow’s mite. And notice that Christ realized she was giving money to religious leaders who would torture & kill Christ - but he focused on her good heart, even if she didn’t realize their evil.

It’s so sad to see even the temple corrupted. Its not completely corrupted - some godly aspects still - yet, somewhat - especially financially. In our church, in order to get a recommend to enter the temple, you must pay - even if you’re poor - a lot of MONEY. Members are being charged for worthiness - even OVER-charged (income rather than increase). Imagine what Christ would do if he could see how temples are being used to make money...

Image
You do realize that a bishop does not know how much money is on your tax return right? You could rationalize what you feel is the correct amount of tithing to pay and declare a full tithe and he wouldn't think the lessor. It really is ultimately between you and the Lord and your interpretation of D&C 119:4

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am
by Thinker
drtanner wrote: April 15th, 2019, 11:30 pm
Thinker wrote: April 15th, 2019, 2:07 pm Craig,
Christ was also called names and predicted that those who taught what he taught, would be hated as you seem to hate me.

Notice how Christ looked on the heart of people - whether they gave a lot or just a widow’s mite. And notice that Christ realized she was giving money to religious leaders who would torture & kill Christ - but he focused on her good heart, even if she didn’t realize their evil.

It’s so sad to see even the temple corrupted. Its not completely corrupted - some godly aspects still - yet, somewhat - especially financially. In our church, in order to get a recommend to enter the temple, you must pay - even if you’re poor - a lot of MONEY. Members are being charged for worthiness - even OVER-charged (income rather than increase). Imagine what Christ would do if he could see how temples are being used to make money...

Image
You do realize that a bishop does not know how much money is on your tax return right? You could rationalize what you feel is the correct amount of tithing to pay and declare a full tithe and he wouldn't think the lessor. It really is ultimately between you and the Lord and your interpretation of D&C 119:4
Are you suggesting be dishonest with my fellowman? - As the church is with sacred money?

Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 8:52 am
by drtanner
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am
drtanner wrote: April 15th, 2019, 11:30 pm
Thinker wrote: April 15th, 2019, 2:07 pm Craig,
Christ was also called names and predicted that those who taught what he taught, would be hated as you seem to hate me.

Notice how Christ looked on the heart of people - whether they gave a lot or just a widow’s mite. And notice that Christ realized she was giving money to religious leaders who would torture & kill Christ - but he focused on her good heart, even if she didn’t realize their evil.

It’s so sad to see even the temple corrupted. Its not completely corrupted - some godly aspects still - yet, somewhat - especially financially. In our church, in order to get a recommend to enter the temple, you must pay - even if you’re poor - a lot of MONEY. Members are being charged for worthiness - even OVER-charged (income rather than increase). Imagine what Christ would do if he could see how temples are being used to make money...

Image
You do realize that a bishop does not know how much money is on your tax return right? You could rationalize what you feel is the correct amount of tithing to pay and declare a full tithe and he wouldn't think the lessor. It really is ultimately between you and the Lord and your interpretation of D&C 119:4
Are you suggesting be dishonest with my fellowman? - As the church is with sacred money?

Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
No what I am saying is no one is telling you how much to pay other than the D&C and the lord. I would encourage you not to rob god and be honest.

There are sacred experiences available in the temple and family history. I have a testimony of those things that is firm and fixed and the same is available to all who will dive into the work that is there.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 8:57 am
by topcat
drtanner wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:52 am
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am
drtanner wrote: April 15th, 2019, 11:30 pm
Thinker wrote: April 15th, 2019, 2:07 pm Craig,
Christ was also called names and predicted that those who taught what he taught, would be hated as you seem to hate me.

Notice how Christ looked on the heart of people - whether they gave a lot or just a widow’s mite. And notice that Christ realized she was giving money to religious leaders who would torture & kill Christ - but he focused on her good heart, even if she didn’t realize their evil.

It’s so sad to see even the temple corrupted. Its not completely corrupted - some godly aspects still - yet, somewhat - especially financially. In our church, in order to get a recommend to enter the temple, you must pay - even if you’re poor - a lot of MONEY. Members are being charged for worthiness - even OVER-charged (income rather than increase). Imagine what Christ would do if he could see how temples are being used to make money...

Image
You do realize that a bishop does not know how much money is on your tax return right? You could rationalize what you feel is the correct amount of tithing to pay and declare a full tithe and he wouldn't think the lessor. It really is ultimately between you and the Lord and your interpretation of D&C 119:4
Are you suggesting be dishonest with my fellowman? - As the church is with sacred money?

Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
No what I am saying is no one is telling you how much to pay other than the D&C and the lord. I would encourage you not to rob god and be honest.

There are sacred experiences available in the temple and family history. I have a testimony of those things that is firm and fixed and the same is available to all who will dive into the work that is there.
Yes, but should the temple recommend interview process (the ability to attend the temple) be used as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to pay tithing?

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 9:25 am
by Craig Johnson
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
So, the church is anti-Christ? Is anyone on this website an actual member of the Church?

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 9:26 am
by Craig Johnson
topcat wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:57 am Yes, but should the temple recommend interview process (the ability to attend the temple) be used as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to pay tithing?
So, the Church extorts people? Is anyone on this website an actual member of the Church?

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 9:32 am
by Serragon
topcat wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:57 am
drtanner wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:52 am
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am
drtanner wrote: April 15th, 2019, 11:30 pm

You do realize that a bishop does not know how much money is on your tax return right? You could rationalize what you feel is the correct amount of tithing to pay and declare a full tithe and he wouldn't think the lessor. It really is ultimately between you and the Lord and your interpretation of D&C 119:4
Are you suggesting be dishonest with my fellowman? - As the church is with sacred money?

Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
No what I am saying is no one is telling you how much to pay other than the D&C and the lord. I would encourage you not to rob god and be honest.

There are sacred experiences available in the temple and family history. I have a testimony of those things that is firm and fixed and the same is available to all who will dive into the work that is there.
Yes, but should the temple recommend interview process (the ability to attend the temple) be used as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to pay tithing?
The words are a reflection of your view, not necessarily reality.

You could just as easily say something like this... Should Christ use salvation as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to submit to and follow him?

You choose to see it as extortion because you want it to be extortion. Others see it as a necessary qualification for temple attendance.

I think it is fine to have a conversation about whether tithing should be a qualifier. But ugly language like that is simply a reflection of your own biases and cannot lead to any legitimate conversation about the topic.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 9:42 am
by Zathura
Serragon wrote: April 16th, 2019, 9:32 am
topcat wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:57 am
drtanner wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:52 am
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am
Are you suggesting be dishonest with my fellowman? - As the church is with sacred money?

Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
No what I am saying is no one is telling you how much to pay other than the D&C and the lord. I would encourage you not to rob god and be honest.

There are sacred experiences available in the temple and family history. I have a testimony of those things that is firm and fixed and the same is available to all who will dive into the work that is there.
Yes, but should the temple recommend interview process (the ability to attend the temple) be used as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to pay tithing?
The words are a reflection of your view, not necessarily reality.

You could just as easily say something like this... Should Christ use salvation as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to submit to and follow him?

You choose to see it as extortion because you want it to be extortion. Others see it as a necessary qualification for temple attendance.

I think it is fine to have a conversation about whether tithing should be a qualifier. But ugly language like that is simply a reflection of your own biases and cannot lead to any legitimate conversation about the topic.
Others see it as a necessary qualification for temple attendance
can this belief also be a :
“reflection of your view, not necessarily reality” ?

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 9:53 am
by Serragon
Stahura wrote: April 16th, 2019, 9:42 am
Serragon wrote: April 16th, 2019, 9:32 am
topcat wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:57 am
drtanner wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:52 am

No what I am saying is no one is telling you how much to pay other than the D&C and the lord. I would encourage you not to rob god and be honest.

There are sacred experiences available in the temple and family history. I have a testimony of those things that is firm and fixed and the same is available to all who will dive into the work that is there.
Yes, but should the temple recommend interview process (the ability to attend the temple) be used as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to pay tithing?
The words are a reflection of your view, not necessarily reality.

You could just as easily say something like this... Should Christ use salvation as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to submit to and follow him?

You choose to see it as extortion because you want it to be extortion. Others see it as a necessary qualification for temple attendance.

I think it is fine to have a conversation about whether tithing should be a qualifier. But ugly language like that is simply a reflection of your own biases and cannot lead to any legitimate conversation about the topic.
Others see it as a necessary qualification for temple attendance
can this belief also be a :
“reflection of your view, not necessarily reality” ?
Of course. Which is why I said I think it fine to have a conversation about whether tithing should be a qualifier.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 9:59 am
by topcat
Serragon wrote: April 16th, 2019, 9:32 am
topcat wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:57 am
drtanner wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:52 am
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am
Are you suggesting be dishonest with my fellowman? - As the church is with sacred money?

Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
No what I am saying is no one is telling you how much to pay other than the D&C and the lord. I would encourage you not to rob god and be honest.

There are sacred experiences available in the temple and family history. I have a testimony of those things that is firm and fixed and the same is available to all who will dive into the work that is there.
Yes, but should the temple recommend interview process (the ability to attend the temple) be used as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to pay tithing?
The words are a reflection of your view, not necessarily reality.

You could just as easily say something like this... Should Christ use salvation as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to submit to and follow him?

You choose to see it as extortion because you want it to be extortion. Others see it as a necessary qualification for temple attendance.

I think it is fine to have a conversation about whether tithing should be a qualifier. But ugly language like that is simply a reflection of your own biases and cannot lead to any legitimate conversation about the topic.
How would you describe the reality?

I know it's an unpleasant word, but the actual definition is:
The practice of obtaining something, especially money, through force or threats.
Tithing is money. The threat is implicit.

Does Christ do the same thing while we are in the flesh, or in mortality?

Was there an example of Him forcing people through extortion or using any type of force while He was here on earth to compel obedience?

It seems that He uses the enticings of the holy spirit to persuade.

Yes, there will be judgment at the last day. And there may be judgment here on earth when the clock on our mortality has expired.

Till then does He compel obedience?

I'm not convinced that He uses any coercion or force to get obedience, if that is what you're alleging above.

On the other hand, I do believe that the Church as a corporation has the absolute legal right to forbid temple attendance to whomever they want to.

The Church has a legal right to come up with whatever criteria they want, provided they don't upset the government too much with the rules they choose. They must stay in subjection to the state no matter what they do, which of course, should cause all members to feel uneasy about the rationale for any of the teachings coming from the leadership. Is it God's will or is it the state's will? Is a perfectly legitimate question.

As to this question of, "Are you a full tithe payer?" Is that using force? If it's not force, what is it called? Is the use of coercion proper or not?

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 11:04 am
by drtanner
topcat wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:57 am
drtanner wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:52 am
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am
drtanner wrote: April 15th, 2019, 11:30 pm

You do realize that a bishop does not know how much money is on your tax return right? You could rationalize what you feel is the correct amount of tithing to pay and declare a full tithe and he wouldn't think the lessor. It really is ultimately between you and the Lord and your interpretation of D&C 119:4
Are you suggesting be dishonest with my fellowman? - As the church is with sacred money?

Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
No what I am saying is no one is telling you how much to pay other than the D&C and the lord. I would encourage you not to rob god and be honest.

There are sacred experiences available in the temple and family history. I have a testimony of those things that is firm and fixed and the same is available to all who will dive into the work that is there.
Yes, but should the temple recommend interview process (the ability to attend the temple) be used as leverage, as a tool of extortion, to get people to pay tithing?
No and it’s not.

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 12:22 pm
by Mark
Craig Johnson wrote: April 16th, 2019, 9:25 am
Thinker wrote: April 16th, 2019, 8:08 am Bottom line: The temple is used to make money & that is anti-Christ.
So, the church is anti-Christ? Is anyone on this website an actual member of the Church?
That answer will become obvious as you read the various posts. Some latter day saints and some latter day aints. :lol:

Re: The Definitive "Anti-Mormon" Thread

Posted: April 16th, 2019, 12:49 pm
by creator
Craig Johnson wrote: April 15th, 2019, 11:18 pmLet's see how to reply to this, whatever it is, without getting another warning from the BOARD. Nope, can't think of anything.
What, you're incapable of expressing disagreement without attacking someone?