Page 2 of 2

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 8:37 am
by braingrunt
1) there is no other way
2) without faith it is impossible to please God (He expects us to operate somewhat in the dark here, hence the veil)
3) I don't really think the point is to learn, it's to be tested on what we've already learned in the preexistence, and know by our own experience how the good/truth we built in our spirit plays out against opposition, and in the dark. Can the rightness in your spirit, which survives the veil, re-identify the true spirit from God, among the other spirits? Can your spirit rule your body according to celestial law, quicken it with a portion of celestial glory? If so, you're a God once cleansed and perfected by Jesus. If not, well, you'll still have a happy place waiting for you. Glory be to God!

So we don't worry too much about the foibles of spiritual progress. Those who are most right will be most right. Few there be.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 9:02 am
by BeNotDeceived
Kris17 wrote: April 9th, 2019, 6:55 pm
Centerline wrote: April 9th, 2019, 6:50 pm Is there a difference between the “truth” and what a person can gain by recognizing and living by the “truth”? Just because a person is not capable of recognizing and using the “truth” to help/encourage/push them to grow today, because it was not appropriate for them at that time, does not mean the “truth” is not there.
If one cannot see that something that another suggests is truth, what matter it. The whole purpose of guidance is to help one widen their perspective in a way that is more aligned with God. It matters not if someone else jumps up and down and says such and such is truth. It only matters if it helps. - is useful. to that one.

We're all in this God together! If you don't wish to help at any given moment, at least don't stand in the way. :)

And now I see I am a "captain" and simply because I have flapped my jaws (er fingers)! But I take it in fun! :)
Cool beans, you :!:

UVC once caused thoughts of Uvall el-capiatan, which prolly was some stupid saying from a movie somewhere. Funny how one thing leads to another. Universal Voltronics, I just discovered is what UVC really means, but making stuff up is more fun. Image

El Capitan was an OS_X https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS_X_El_Capitan

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 11:04 am
by Kris17
Thinker wrote: April 9th, 2019, 7:41 pm So how do you figure out truth?
As we were discussing in another thread, both common sense and intuition (the Spirit) are needed. Logic/reason ought to be common sense, but that’s another story. ;)

Let’s focus on the Spirit. When you get the chills, a burning in your bosom - exactly what does it mean?? Does it mean, “I need to get up walk 23 steps, into my car, to the airport, and fly like mad to romance in Fiji”?? Ok more realistic: does such sensation mean whatever I’m thinking when I feel this is indicative of what I need to do? What if I feel the Spirit watching Star Wars - does that mean I should begin Jedi training academy, (as Shadow dreams ;) )?

The Spirit reminds me a bit of this miraculous world and universe - I often feel the Spirit as I gaze up into a star-filled sky, or feel the peace just being surrounded by nature. I don’t add extra meaning as if the Spirit is telling me I need to be an astronaut or live out of a tent. I think the Spirit is often a profound sense of gratitude and love... though sometimes it can be guidance - but that seems a bit different.

How do you distinguish between what you want or fear, and spiritual guidance? I have experienced warnings when I wasn’t thinking about it. Maybe the Spirit works in spiritual guidance, more when you allow for some sense of stillness but also trust in God. Also, I imagine a good sense of self-awareness is part of entering into the kingdom of God within.
Nice post - How do I - (or more importantly - "does one") figure out truth. : when I was born I happened to have an anomaly that very frequently caused me excruciating pain. Since my parents and the Drs did not recognize this, i grew up with this - of course ever increasing physical and mental tension to try to survive and act appropriately in this world. Ha! (insert your own set of trials and hardships here - most of us have them!)

I knew each time I tensed up, physically or mentally, that I was hardening myself against the very help/guidance that could save me. (how could I have known that??? dunno, but I was blessed with it.) Anyway, at 27 (Saturn return. get it? ;) )I got a fix for that prob so was still left with a phantom limb type pain hitting my brain but realized I had to find a way to winnow back down through all that tension/blockage I had put on. I found an experimental psychologist at Purdue who taught me something (that Freud had actually played with a bit in his later years) which i have come to call focused abreaction - focus on a tension or feeling, let it abreact, then jacobson relax to get catharsis - yada yada and so on - like the layers of an onion I became more and more free so I could thus "hear" better and better. I knew I could obviously hear pretty well when I was young and in the midst of all that pain and yet was together enough to know that i was screwing myself and somehow had to wait until I could escape that and work back.

So how do I know? -I have come to understand that it is simple - if it helps, if it works!. It doesn't matter if I am being told one thing and the most well meaning person is telling me another (and yes, of course, we have all found this out the hard way!!! :) ) I need to go off into the desert of my mind and follow the ideas given me and lo, dam it, they work.
"both common sense and intuition (the Spirit) are needed. Logic/reason ought to be common sense, but that’s another story. ;)"
Yes, but I oft think, in frustration, that most folks down here do not have that, for one reason or another. They have not heard, or listened to that tiny voice, and followed it to where it lead. Have you tried Fiji? Don't know, there might be a teacher there for you in this pretend scene,. ;) But I have found that when I get the urge to travel to say Europe, and follow that urge with a bit of planning, i seem to both burn out that urge, but also discover strengths and awarenesses in myself that I was not aware of - right here. And go to work on them!
In one sense it's all about the step of clearing out the fog so you can hear clearly. This is a process and likely different for each soul down here, though I also find there are many commonalities - a desire to improve one's condition.
You can certainly get very valid messages from Star Wars, if only "pay attention to where you are, what you are doing!". Your guides/helpers are cheap in a very good way - they will use ANYTHING to get you to pause for a second to see things differently. Read that again!!!

Fears, particularly fear of being destroyed, or fear of ceasing to exist, are of course biggies. Because of the tools i picked up when I was 30, to me, they are just another bump in the road, albeit huge bumps - like pain. exactly. go into it, let it be for a minute, it will disolve, and relax and cathart. I remember something that that chauvinist Frank Herbert wrote in Dune - a litany of the bene Geserit : "I must not fear... I will let it pas through me..." from the minds of babes. But I, to, am cheap - I will take truth wherever I find it - IF it bears out!!!

I try to be in constant communication with my guides and God. Prayer. Asking always for understanding. I am far from perfect, but if we can pause here and reflect on the Word of Wisdom, I find I do MUCH better if I am not filling my body with sugars and carbs. And heavy foods. edit and caffeine. I suspect once one becomes more clear one can partake a bit of that and do okay, but would probably realize that things (the workings of the mind/spirit/God ) just work better without them.

How to distinguish between... : easy! If you go into - allow it to its fullness and it does not disolve, then look more closely at it, become more one with it. If you feel stronger with the Is, go for it! Fears, though they seem totally real, will simply disolve if you give them their fullness. However, be careful not to indulge - that is to only partially give something it's fullness. Here I feel it is helpful and advisable to have someone you can talk to about your process, who is free enough to let you explore, but who can sense (not because of their own fears, but because of their awareness - almost telepath-ability). I shopped for a psychiatrist who was a bit of a free spirit, and used Celexa occasionally to assure I did not harm myself while digging through the onion - I sure had tons of suicidal feelings wishes when I was little, so, of course I had to work back down through all that and face them again.

You may not need all that. Each has a different path - set of things they came here to learn.
"Also, I imagine a good sense of self-awareness is part of entering into the kingdom of God within."
Yep. I think I was blessed with that and entered here with that, though, like most, lost it quickly.

My Peace to you profound, on this difficult path.

I need to rest for a bit - be back later. :)

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 2:42 pm
by Kris17
Alaris wrote: April 9th, 2019, 9:13 pm <snip purely for momentary focus...>

My buddy showed me a screenshot of a fb friend's comment about how he'd been fasting to save the children of gays that was quite clearly holier than thou virtue signaling (Utah lol.) what if enough saints murmured at the last policy that the Lord instituted the change so we could see what happens when we give the gay community (the devil) an inch. Has anyone thought of that or expressed this possibility?

Ephraim is in such a state of pride right now. Imagine if the shtf (stuff hits the fan) soon. How quickly will those whining about the brethren run to them when times get tough? How many will acknowledge they were speaking ill of the Lords anointed just days or weeks before?

How many who have detested the brethren all along make their position clear and how many pretend they're just now losing faith?
--This is NOT a chastisement, but merely a comment, nothing more.--

It is so easy for all of us to see where others are trying to imagine virtue to themselves (and/or other spiritually wasteful activities!). If you wish to you could take (only) a moment to pity them (I do not as I find that offers too much of a chance of a hint at superiority)(simply be an observer and notice it w/o judging), and then (and here it is definitely not my place to instruct you! so I will bend this back on myself) quickly reflect back on myself - forget that observation! and ask what do I need to look at in my own interaction with God, and God's people - (yep, they're all God's people - like 'em or not - we're all in this God together! :) ) , and is this something I need to look at when i am doing energy/prayer work. Always ask for understanding. You could ask "why was I shown that?", "what do I need to learn?" , "what do I need to pay attention to?". You will get it! Have fun!!! Peace!

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 2:50 pm
by Kris17
BeNotDeceived wrote: April 10th, 2019, 9:02 am
Kris17 wrote: April 9th, 2019, 6:55 pm
Centerline wrote: April 9th, 2019, 6:50 pm Is there a difference between the “truth” and what a person can gain by recognizing and living by the “truth”? Just because a person is not capable of recognizing and using the “truth” to help/encourage/push them to grow today, because it was not appropriate for them at that time, does not mean the “truth” is not there.
If one cannot see that something that another suggests is truth, what matter it. The whole purpose of guidance is to help one widen their perspective in a way that is more aligned with God. It matters not if someone else jumps up and down and says such and such is truth. It only matters if it helps. - is useful. to that one.

We're all in this God together! If you don't wish to help at any given moment, at least don't stand in the way. :)

And now I see I am a "captain" and simply because I have flapped my jaws (er fingers)! But I take it in fun! :)
Cool beans, you :!:

UVC once caused thoughts of Uvall el-capiatan, which prolly was some stupid saying from a movie somewhere. Funny how one thing leads to another. Universal Voltronics, I just discovered is what UVC really means, but making stuff up is more fun. Image

El Capitan was an OS_X https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS_X_El_Capitan
See how much I miss by running Ubuntu!!! :D

And then there's those poor 10 souls who are following me...
NO!
Look within!!!
Talk to God!
Pray for understanding!!!
but, yes, have fun on the journey!!!

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 3:37 pm
by Alaris
Kris17 wrote: April 10th, 2019, 2:42 pm
Alaris wrote: April 9th, 2019, 9:13 pm <snip purely for momentary focus...>

My buddy showed me a screenshot of a fb friend's comment about how he'd been fasting to save the children of gays that was quite clearly holier than thou virtue signaling (Utah lol.) what if enough saints murmured at the last policy that the Lord instituted the change so we could see what happens when we give the gay community (the devil) an inch. Has anyone thought of that or expressed this possibility?

Ephraim is in such a state of pride right now. Imagine if the shtf (stuff hits the fan) soon. How quickly will those whining about the brethren run to them when times get tough? How many will acknowledge they were speaking ill of the Lords anointed just days or weeks before?

How many who have detested the brethren all along make their position clear and how many pretend they're just now losing faith?
--This is NOT a chastisement, but merely a comment, nothing more.--

It is so easy for all of us to see where others are trying to imagine virtue to themselves (and/or other spiritually wasteful activities!). If you wish to you could take (only) a moment to pity them (I do not as I find that offers too much of a chance of a hint at superiority)(simply be an observer and notice it w/o judging), and then (and here it is definitely not my place to instruct you! so I will bend this back on myself) quickly reflect back on myself - forget that observation! and ask what do I need to look at in my own interaction with God, and God's people - (yep, they're all God's people - like 'em or not - we're all in this God together! :) ) , and is this something I need to look at when i am doing energy/prayer work. Always ask for understanding. You could ask "why was I shown that?", "what do I need to learn?" , "what do I need to pay attention to?". You will get it! Have fun!!! Peace!
Good post - I will admit a spiritual deficiency within me when it comes to the self righteousness of Utah Mormons who are "extra" righteous usually by following man-made laws as the Pharisees did - and clearly to be seen of men with such virtue signaling. I shouldn't "lol" at such as the Savior certainly would not. Chastisement is OK - we should be able to chastise each other in love - Joseph Smith clearly sought for this culture among the saints.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 8:38 pm
by Kris17
Alaris wrote: April 10th, 2019, 3:37 pm Good post - I will admit a spiritual deficiency within me when it comes to the self righteousness of Utah Mormons who are "extra" righteous usually by following man-made laws as the Pharisees did - and clearly to be seen of men with such virtue signaling. I shouldn't "lol" at such as the Savior certainly would not. Chastisement is OK - we should be able to chastise each other in love - Joseph Smith clearly sought for this culture among the saints.
Nope, no chastisement!!!! def not!

" I shouldn't "lol" at such as the Savior certainly would not. "

Oh yeah?
I seem to recall something somewhere about shaking the dust from the sandals etc etc. :) definitely making a judgemental comment. I see no problem with that. Does not lessen Him as a teacher. Note it and look within is what I try to do though I sure am not perfect with it. but maybe by next week... :D

As to self righteousness of Utah Mormons. or maybe just the self righteousness of some Mormons (not location specific). But then I don't think there is a group on this earth that doesn't have some of those - whether religion or political faction or any sort of organization, or rebels, or insurgents or (whom have I left out, and all with massive quotes since they are never really what they are portrayed to be).

The problem with grouping or labeling others, or even ourselves, is that we become as an ice cube - stuck, unchangeable. And no real motion is allowed until we drop the labels and simply recognize all (especially ourselves!) as individuals. But, of course, organizations don't want to do that as they then lose power. Oops. did i say that? Oh well, just ignore that - move on - nothing here.

Be at Peace!

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 10th, 2019, 11:46 pm
by Primary Outcast
Will the Holy Ghost prompt someone to become a Methodist preacher (or jewish, or baptist, or catholic, or or or)? The answer is yes. Do they all preach pure truth? No.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 11th, 2019, 10:13 am
by Craig Johnson
Primary Outcast wrote: April 10th, 2019, 11:46 pm Will the Holy Ghost prompt someone to become a Methodist preacher (or jewish, or baptist, or catholic, or or or)? The answer is yes. Do they all preach pure truth? No.
I don't think so “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof” what you infer is not in harmony with God's words in the first vision to the Prophet Joseph Smith.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 11th, 2019, 11:21 am
by captainfearnot
ajax wrote: April 8th, 2019, 11:25 am Revelation and the HG.

This seems to me to be quite obvious. We see it when we compare each others notes about what we are supposedly receiving, some get one answer, some get a completely different, diametrically opposed answer. We see it among the church hierarchy, a supposed "revelation" diametrically opposed to another "revelation" just a few years later. The latest being only one in a long line. An apostle talking about God giving wrong directions on purpose, see Holland's "wrong roads".

It seems to be really one big crap shoot. And of course everybody seems to think theirs is correct. It's probably really just subconscious preferences and traditions coming through.
I wonder what to make of the fact that the least reliable method for determining truth also happens to be the most persuasive and motivating to the person experiencing it? If someone sincerely believes that the emotional/spiritual experience they just felt is a revelation from God communicating some specific message to them, no amount of reasoning or evidence will convince them otherwise. Even though it's incredibly easy for a bystander to the whole account to dismiss the entire thing.

I get that anyone selling something (the Church included) understands this, and that's why they're always trying to piggyback on those powerful emotions, but why would this be a part of an epistemology originating with God?

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 11th, 2019, 11:36 am
by Kris17
captainfearnot wrote: April 11th, 2019, 11:21 am
I wonder what to make of the fact that the least reliable method for determining truth also happens to be the most persuasive and motivating to the person experiencing it? If someone sincerely believes that the emotional/spiritual experience they just felt is a revelation from God communicating some specific message to them, no amount of reasoning or evidence will convince them otherwise. Even though it's incredibly easy for a bystander to the whole account to dismiss the entire thing.

I get that anyone selling something (the Church included) understands this, and that's why they're always trying to piggyback on those powerful emotions, but why would this be a part of an epistemology originating with God?
It shouldn't be - the real thing doesn't need a sales pitch. edit: Or a bunch of people telling you what to believe and what to do. It will naturally feel good and so you will naturally tend to do it.

LOL - I am immediately reminded that some will say that things like sugar and carbs and caffeine feel good! (or any addictive substance or activity) Lol - but for most, if you separate yourself from them for a bit, and then try them again, you will discover that they really don't...

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 11th, 2019, 10:38 pm
by Primary Outcast
Craig Johnson wrote: April 11th, 2019, 10:13 am
Primary Outcast wrote: April 10th, 2019, 11:46 pm Will the Holy Ghost prompt someone to become a Methodist preacher (or jewish, or baptist, or catholic, or or or)? The answer is yes. Do they all preach pure truth? No.
I don't think so “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof” what you infer is not in harmony with God's words in the first vision to the Prophet Joseph Smith.
I used to think like you do too. I talked to a man yesterday who's father was imprisoned for 19 years in Russia by Joseph Stalin because he was a Christian. He refused to deny his beliefs. Not all Christians out side of our church fit the description quoted.

So many people on this forum are quick to disagree, but almost no one stops to ask why a belief is had. I've already done the work that formed the opinion in my previous statement. The truth of it is quite simple and logical if you ponder on it. I'll just leave it there for now.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 12th, 2019, 7:28 am
by Craig Johnson
Primary Outcast wrote: April 11th, 2019, 10:38 pm
Craig Johnson wrote: April 11th, 2019, 10:13 am
Primary Outcast wrote: April 10th, 2019, 11:46 pm Will the Holy Ghost prompt someone to become a Methodist preacher (or jewish, or baptist, or catholic, or or or)? The answer is yes. Do they all preach pure truth? No.
I don't think so “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof” what you infer is not in harmony with God's words in the first vision to the Prophet Joseph Smith.
I used to think like you do too. I talked to a man yesterday who's father was imprisoned for 19 years in Russia by Joseph Stalin because he was a Christian. He refused to deny his beliefs. Not all Christians out side of our church fit the description quoted.

So many people on this forum are quick to disagree, but almost no one stops to ask why a belief is had. I've already done the work that formed the opinion in my previous statement. The truth of it is quite simple and logical if you ponder on it. I'll just leave it there for now.
This is not quick, I have been studying this question since the 70s. I give this as my opinion, and interestingly I first thought this way, then I thought as you and now for the last many years I have gone back to this way of thinking.
It's not complicated, but you are talking about God, the Holy Ghost prompting someone to teach a doctrine that is false. Not gonna happen. The man, in your example, is going through a process to come to the true gospel, no doubt, but this is done by other means other than God, the Holy Ghost sending him to become a preacher of a false doctrine. When you say that he is prompted to become a preacher of false doctrine is where I see error, no, not sent to become a preacher of a false doctrine, rather-sent to progress through error mixed with truth to come to the truth eventually, not sent to preach false doctrine, a fine point.
Also, we both need to realize that we don't KNOW, we are only giving our opinion, I think my OPINION has a better backup, but it is still just an opinion, since neither of us know what God in doing in the lives of others.
Also, you don't qualify by saying this man eventually came to the true church, which to me is the vital matter of claiming someone was prompted by God, the Holy Ghost. Remember the words in Matthew chapter 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
What is the Father's will(?), it is for us to come into the true church and take upon us the covenants of the true gospel, obey and endure to the end. Many people know that suffering is endured by true disciples of the Lord, will those whom He does not know and claim their suffering for Him be rewarded in similar fashion as verse 23?

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 12th, 2019, 10:27 am
by Primary Outcast
Craig Johnson wrote: April 12th, 2019, 7:28 am
Primary Outcast wrote: April 11th, 2019, 10:38 pm
Craig Johnson wrote: April 11th, 2019, 10:13 am
Primary Outcast wrote: April 10th, 2019, 11:46 pm Will the Holy Ghost prompt someone to become a Methodist preacher (or jewish, or baptist, or catholic, or or or)? The answer is yes. Do they all preach pure truth? No.
I don't think so “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof” what you infer is not in harmony with God's words in the first vision to the Prophet Joseph Smith.
I used to think like you do too. I talked to a man yesterday who's father was imprisoned for 19 years in Russia by Joseph Stalin because he was a Christian. He refused to deny his beliefs. Not all Christians out side of our church fit the description quoted.

So many people on this forum are quick to disagree, but almost no one stops to ask why a belief is had. I've already done the work that formed the opinion in my previous statement. The truth of it is quite simple and logical if you ponder on it. I'll just leave it there for now.
This is not quick, I have been studying this question since the 70s. I give this as my opinion, and interestingly I first thought this way, then I thought as you and now for the last many years I have gone back to this way of thinking.
It's not complicated, but you are talking about God, the Holy Ghost prompting someone to teach a doctrine that is false. Not gonna happen. The man, in your example, is going through a process to come to the true gospel, no doubt, but this is done by other means other than God, the Holy Ghost sending him to become a preacher of a false doctrine. When you say that he is prompted to become a preacher of false doctrine is where I see error, no, not sent to become a preacher of a false doctrine, rather-sent to progress through error mixed with truth to come to the truth eventually, not sent to preach false doctrine, a fine point.
Also, we both need to realize that we don't KNOW, we are only giving our opinion, I think my OPINION has a better backup, but it is still just an opinion, since neither of us know what God in doing in the lives of others.
Also, you don't qualify by saying this man eventually came to the true church, which to me is the vital matter of claiming someone was prompted by God, the Holy Ghost. Remember the words in Matthew chapter 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
What is the Father's will(?), it is for us to come into the true church and take upon us the covenants of the true gospel, obey and endure to the end. Many people know that suffering is endured by true disciples of the Lord, will those whom He does not know and claim their suffering for Him be rewarded in similar fashion as verse 23?
I don't believe this life is quite so black and white. I think life is a series of decisions that lead to growth or decay. We are held accountable for these decisions based on the light and knowledge available to us.

Can any good thing come from Sikhism? Of course. Would the world be better off without it? I don't think so. Tens of Billions of people have lived on this earth without ever hearing the doctrine of Christ. How does the Holy Ghost work on them? Should each one of them be left on their own or could someone be inspired with some little truth and morality to share with them? Perhaps there have been billions of people that would have rejected the doctrine of Christ if presented to them, and perhaps in Gods mercy He gave them a religion that would help them grow to what they could accept and handle, give them a basis to grow from, but not enough light and knowledge to condemn them.

As for Matthew 7, in my opinion the Master is asking us to do the things that he has asked us to do. Prophesying and casting out devils is good right? But he never asked them to do these things in the sermon on the mount, he asked them to feed the hungry, love our enemy, etc.

Bottom line is that I believe that the Holy Ghost inspires people to be better in their situation, whatever that is. Many (maybe most) preachers of other faiths say that they were called to the ministry by the Spirit in their heart. I believe them. Many of them do much good with what little they are given, and I think the members of their congregations and the world is better for it.

It sounds like you've already pondered these same ideas and came to an opposite view point. I'd be interested to know more about that process and I apologize for assuming that you hadn't thought this through on your own.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 12th, 2019, 6:14 pm
by Toast
ajax wrote: April 8th, 2019, 11:25 am Revelation and the HG.

This seems to me to be quite obvious. We see it when we compare each others notes about what we are supposedly receiving, some get one answer, some get a completely different, diametrically opposed answer. We see it among the church hierarchy, a supposed "revelation" diametrically opposed to another "revelation" just a few years later. The latest being only one in a long line. An apostle talking about God giving wrong directions on purpose, see Holland's "wrong roads".

It seems to be really one big crap shoot. And of course everybody seems to think theirs is correct. It's probably really just subconscious preferences and traditions coming through.
It is indeed quite obvious for those who allow themselves to think and question freely. They are not prophets, seers, or revelators, as undeniably demonstrated by their actions. I suspect many of them know this and those who believe themselves to really be prophets are severely drunk on coolaid or have mental health issues. I mean, why would an Apostle write an anonymous confession letter saying that it's all a big fraud?

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 12th, 2019, 6:30 pm
by setyourselffree
Toast wrote: April 12th, 2019, 6:14 pm
ajax wrote: April 8th, 2019, 11:25 am Revelation and the HG.

This seems to me to be quite obvious. We see it when we compare each others notes about what we are supposedly receiving, some get one answer, some get a completely different, diametrically opposed answer. We see it among the church hierarchy, a supposed "revelation" diametrically opposed to another "revelation" just a few years later. The latest being only one in a long line. An apostle talking about God giving wrong directions on purpose, see Holland's "wrong roads".

It seems to be really one big crap shoot. And of course everybody seems to think theirs is correct. It's probably really just subconscious preferences and traditions coming through.
It is indeed quite obvious for those who allow themselves to think and question freely. They are not prophets, seers, or revelators, as undeniably demonstrated by their actions. I suspect many of them know this and those who believe themselves to really be prophets are severely drunk on coolaid or have mental health issues. I mean, why would an Apostle write an anonymous confession letter saying that it's all a big fraud?
Who art thou? For behold, I am a son of God, in the similitude of his Only Begotten; and where is thy glory? Get thee hence.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 12th, 2019, 9:57 pm
by Craig Johnson
Primary Outcast wrote: April 12th, 2019, 10:27 am
Craig Johnson wrote: April 12th, 2019, 7:28 am
Primary Outcast wrote: April 11th, 2019, 10:38 pm
Craig Johnson wrote: April 11th, 2019, 10:13 am

I don't think so “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof” what you infer is not in harmony with God's words in the first vision to the Prophet Joseph Smith.
I used to think like you do too. I talked to a man yesterday who's father was imprisoned for 19 years in Russia by Joseph Stalin because he was a Christian. He refused to deny his beliefs. Not all Christians out side of our church fit the description quoted.

So many people on this forum are quick to disagree, but almost no one stops to ask why a belief is had. I've already done the work that formed the opinion in my previous statement. The truth of it is quite simple and logical if you ponder on it. I'll just leave it there for now.
This is not quick, I have been studying this question since the 70s. I give this as my opinion, and interestingly I first thought this way, then I thought as you and now for the last many years I have gone back to this way of thinking.
It's not complicated, but you are talking about God, the Holy Ghost prompting someone to teach a doctrine that is false. Not gonna happen. The man, in your example, is going through a process to come to the true gospel, no doubt, but this is done by other means other than God, the Holy Ghost sending him to become a preacher of a false doctrine. When you say that he is prompted to become a preacher of false doctrine is where I see error, no, not sent to become a preacher of a false doctrine, rather-sent to progress through error mixed with truth to come to the truth eventually, not sent to preach false doctrine, a fine point.
Also, we both need to realize that we don't KNOW, we are only giving our opinion, I think my OPINION has a better backup, but it is still just an opinion, since neither of us know what God in doing in the lives of others.
Also, you don't qualify by saying this man eventually came to the true church, which to me is the vital matter of claiming someone was prompted by God, the Holy Ghost. Remember the words in Matthew chapter 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
What is the Father's will(?), it is for us to come into the true church and take upon us the covenants of the true gospel, obey and endure to the end. Many people know that suffering is endured by true disciples of the Lord, will those whom He does not know and claim their suffering for Him be rewarded in similar fashion as verse 23?
I don't believe this life is quite so black and white. I think life is a series of decisions that lead to growth or decay. We are held accountable for these decisions based on the light and knowledge available to us.

Can any good thing come from Sikhism? Of course. Would the world be better off without it? I don't think so. Tens of Billions of people have lived on this earth without ever hearing the doctrine of Christ. How does the Holy Ghost work on them? Should each one of them be left on their own or could someone be inspired with some little truth and morality to share with them? Perhaps there have been billions of people that would have rejected the doctrine of Christ if presented to them, and perhaps in Gods mercy He gave them a religion that would help them grow to what they could accept and handle, give them a basis to grow from, but not enough light and knowledge to condemn them.

As for Matthew 7, in my opinion the Master is asking us to do the things that he has asked us to do. Prophesying and casting out devils is good right? But he never asked them to do these things in the sermon on the mount, he asked them to feed the hungry, love our enemy, etc.

Bottom line is that I believe that the Holy Ghost inspires people to be better in their situation, whatever that is. Many (maybe most) preachers of other faiths say that they were called to the ministry by the Spirit in their heart. I believe them. Many of them do much good with what little they are given, and I think the members of their congregations and the world is better for it.

It sounds like you've already pondered these same ideas and came to an opposite view point. I'd be interested to know more about that process and I apologize for assuming that you hadn't thought this through on your own.
You think deeply, and that will serve you well.
Another thing you think that I have actually phased through a few times is the black and white and very little gray thing. I currently think there is very little gray, but in a different way. I truly believe that every soul will be given, in this life or the next, a substantial opportunity to be presented the truth and to decide whether or not they will accept it. In this life with that choice presented and rejected, my current thinking is that it MIGHT get re-presented in the next life, depending on the conditions that were present when it was presented in this life. God is very merciful, but when the deal is fully, knowingly rejected - then, IMO the deal is off.
The Holy Ghost probably does a lot we are not aware of, but the Light of Christ does a lot more than people have any idea of also. It is the Light of Christ that is present in many of these circumstances that you relay, IMO. And people, not really knowing what the difference is, impute the action of the Holy Ghost, which is not to say that the Holy Ghost cannot do things like this, merely that He has certain functions and He does those and the Light of Christ has the functions you are referring to and does those, IMO.
There is also this, when a person is cognizant that the Lord commands them to repent and live righteously and they knowingly choose to die in their sins, I sincerely believe that this is going to negatively impact their chance of being able to repent and receive all the blessings of the gospel in the next life.

Re: The Least Reliable Method for Receiving Truth:

Posted: April 15th, 2019, 12:01 pm
by Jamescm
If it provides any comfort or provokes any thought, I'm really not concerned with a lot of specific details.
"Did so-and-so literally see the body of Jesus Christ, or do they only have entirely faith-based testimonies like us?"
"Should children of so-and-so circumstance be baptized, or not?"
"Should we be joyful and distracting during so-and-so event, or solemn and composed?"
"I know X is against the rules, but what about this particular kind of X under this specific circumstance?"
"Wine in, pork out. Pork in, wine out. Which should it really be in the 'true' church?"
"Pray to Jesus? Or pray to Heavenly Father in Jesus name?"
"What is tithing 10% of, exactly? What about this separate allowance I receive? What about welfare? What about tax credits?"
"I won't go to the Telestial Kingdom if I get a tattoo, watch an R-rated movie, date at age fifteen, wear a non-white shirt to church, or use course but non-blasphemous language, will I?"

As for myself, I DON'T CARE. I really don't. They're small and pointless details-any mistakes made in this realm will be made up for by the Atonement. I give my own children different advice, standards, or rules in different circumstances because those circumstances are, well, different. In a car ride, I may tell one to go ahead and pee her pants while in another car ride, I'd tell a different child to hold it. It's not because I'm unfair, a respecter of persons, or an unpredictable parent, it's because in the former case she was wearing a diaper or we weren't going to be able to stop for her in the near future, and in the latter case we were almost home.

We are tiny children in mortality compared to our Heavenly Parents, and I'm pretty sure a lot of these less consequential things we receive are of equal import. You will one day grow up and have children whether or not you pee your pants, as long as you quite focusing on that and look at the big picture.

I'm also not always perfect in the shots I call. I don't want any of my children to throw out Jesus Christ, Joseph Smith, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, or free government just because I didn't teach them how to properly react to troublesome neighbors, or because I told them not to play video games on Sunday and then they come out of their room at 9:30 at night to me playing a (relaxing or otherwise non-violent!) video game.

If it turns out that green tea ice cream was permissible during my mortal probation after all, or that I should've hooted and hollered because Tucson finally got a temple announcement after living there for two decades and then leaving, it doesn't mean my abstaining from green tea ice cream or cheering out loud were wastes of some kind. It means I was developing myself spiritually by heading my understanding of a call and a request from a prophet of God.