2018 Statistical Report From 2019 Gen Conf

[Lizzy60]

I knew Macron was the leader of France but wasn’t sure if it was the same Macron being referenced. I’m not clear on what his goals are, or how it applies to “NWO conditioning”

NWO conditioning -- New World Order advocates for a much lower worldwide population, say about 10% of what we currently have. Limited birth rate is just a small part, but obviously necessary.

[ori]

NWO conditioning -- New World Order advocates for a much lower worldwide population, say about 10% of what we currently have. Limited birth rate is just a small part, but obviously necessary.

I believe you, it sounds familiar. However I don’t understand it, wouldn’t they think that *more* slaves be better, when they have all the power?

[Lizzy60]

NWO conditioning -- New World Order advocates for a much lower worldwide population, say about 10% of what we currently have. Limited birth rate is just a small part, but obviously necessary.

I believe you, it sounds familiar. However I don’t understand it, wouldn’t they think that *more* slaves be better, when they have all the power?

They call them useless eaters. People who are not worth what it costs to feed and shelter them. I believe the figure they have in mind is about a half billion people worldwide. Plenty of "slaves" for the ones in power.

[harakim]

Machines are replacing humans as the slaves of choice

[Fiannan]

Some of them are good, some of them devout in their religions, but most...well, if you do not understand the minds of psychopaths you cannot at all understand government, entertainment, or even religion.

[Fiannan]

Machines are replacing humans as the slaves of choice

True. And in a truly Luciferian sense, if the powers-that-be have decided that human "resources" are too great then if they persuade them to not marry, to not reproduce, to run after things rather than develop their minds then the sin will be solely on the heads of the herds who are too stupid to recognize what is being done to them.

[Toast]

Yes.

A Mormon once told me that I was being selfish for not having kids. Am I selfish?

So how many kids do I need to have to not be selfish anymore? What's the number? Do I need to have at least one to not be selfish or have as many as my body can handle making? They won't be raised Mormon or in any religion for that matter, does this make a difference?

I want zero kids, and that makes me selfish? So tell me, how many kids do you want me to have?

[abijah]

I want zero kids, and that makes me selfish?

Selfish yes, though perhaps “unnatural” is a better term. We are wired top-down to reproduce, Darwin got that right. The desire for sterility, biologically & evolutionarily speaking, is fundamentally unnatural, as well as perverse to the pattern set by God in Genesis.

Amazing how science and religion together both trump so many of these modern, western fallacies we see taking hold. Homosexuality is another. Nations who accept homosexuality are demolished by heterosexual nations. One breeds weakness, the other strength.

[Elizabeth]

Toast, why are you posting on this Forum?

[Centerline]

Toast, I think you should have two kids. Hopefully a boy and a girl.

[h_p]

So how many kids do I need to have to not be selfish anymore? What's the number? Do I need to have at least one to not be selfish or have as many as my body can handle making? They won't be raised Mormon or in any religion for that matter, does this make a difference?

I want zero kids, and that makes me selfish? So tell me, how many kids do you want me to have?

Selfishness is not determined by the number of children you choose or choose not to have. It's the reasons why that would determine it, and none of us here are in a position to judge you on that. A person could have 10 kids for purely selfish reasons, and a person could have 0 for completely unselfish ones.

[nvr]

Yes.

A Mormon once told me that I was being selfish for not having kids. Am I selfish?

So how many kids do I need to have to not be selfish anymore? What's the number? Do I need to have at least one to not be selfish or have as many as my body can handle making? They won't be raised Mormon or in any religion for that matter, does this make a difference?

I want zero kids, and that makes me selfish? So tell me, how many kids do you want me to have?

As a single man*, you wouldn't be expected to have any children by yourself. Upon being married to a wife, any amount of children that both of you are
able to emotionally and financially take care of would be the correct number.

*Sorry if I assumed your gender incorrectly. I wasn't sure, so I took a sample of your comments and checked with this application: http://www.hackerfactor.com/GenderGuesser.php and went from the results:
Results
Genre: Informal
Female = 558
Male = 1720
Difference = 1162; 75.5%
Verdict: MALE

Genre: Formal
Female = 742
Male = 915
Difference = 173; 55.22%
Verdict: Weak MALE
Weak emphasis could indicate European.

[Toast]

As a single man*, you wouldn't be expected to have any children by yourself. Upon being married to a wife, any amount of children that both of you are
able to emotionally and financially take care of would be the correct number.

*Sorry if I assumed your gender incorrectly. I wasn't sure, so I took a sample of your comments and checked with this application: http://www.hackerfactor.com/GenderGuesser.php and went from the results:
Results
Genre: Informal
Female = 558
Male = 1720
Difference = 1162; 75.5%
Verdict: MALE

Genre: Formal
Female = 742
Male = 915
Difference = 173; 55.22%
Verdict: Weak MALE
Weak emphasis could indicate European.

As a woman in a relationship, the correct number of kids for me and my boyfriend is zero. Nice try!

[Fiannan]

As a woman in a relationship, the correct number of kids for me and my boyfriend is zero. Nice try!

Even if that were true, you would have to admit that sex is a motivation behind just about everything we do. The biological imperative is to survive long enough to pass on your genes. Unless one would have some sort of genetic problems they did not want to pass onto their offspring, why would a rational human being reject what is built into our very being?

[nvr]

As a single man*, you wouldn't be expected to have any children by yourself. Upon being married to a wife, any amount of children that both of you are
able to emotionally and financially take care of would be the correct number.

*Sorry if I assumed your gender incorrectly. I wasn't sure, so I took a sample of your comments and checked with this application: http://www.hackerfactor.com/GenderGuesser.php and went from the results:
Results
Genre: Informal
Female = 558
Male = 1720
Difference = 1162; 75.5%
Verdict: MALE

Genre: Formal
Female = 742
Male = 915
Difference = 173; 55.22%
Verdict: Weak MALE
Weak emphasis could indicate European.

As a woman in a relationship, the correct number of kids for me and my boyfriend is zero. Nice try!

Sorry I assumed your relationship status. How would you explain the writing analysis results? Did someone help you write it? I guess the tool could be wrong.
It makes sense how someone could be uncomfortable to say he was born a male if he now identified as a woman. Do you believe a person's DNA will change when he or she transitions to opposite gender ?

[Toast]

As a woman in a relationship, the correct number of kids for me and my boyfriend is zero. Nice try!

Even if that were true, you would have to admit that sex is a motivation behind just about everything we do. The biological imperative is to survive long enough to pass on your genes. Unless one would have some sort of genetic problems they did not want to pass onto their offspring, why would a rational human being reject what is built into our very being?

I don't feel the need to pass along my genes, no. However, if I lived in a village in the rain forest in Africa or I lived on an island somewhere, then I may want kids because that would be a great childhood.

Sorry I assumed your relationship status. How would you explain the writing analysis results? Did someone help you write it? I guess the tool could be wrong.
It makes sense how someone could be uncomfortable to say he was born a male if he now identified as a woman. Do you believe a person's DNA will change when he or she transitions to opposite gender ?

What text did you "analyze"? I'm not sure how that relates to my sex in anyway.. Elaborate on that? Are you saying I should get surgery to become a man because that's who I really am based on my writing style? That's crazy....

I was born with a vagina, thus I identify as a woman. What are you going on about? Why won't you leave my gender along?

[nvr]

I copied and pasted a few of your posts into the website. With your posting this false apostle letter, the time spent here spreading depraved viewpoints, being so disingenuous about seeking to learn eternal truths, your transparent efforts to deconstruct any and all parts of of God's Kingdom on earth, and the analysis results, I assumed you were being dishonest about even your sex. My apologies if I assumed incorrectly.

[harakim]

I always thought he was a man too.

[setyourselffree]

Yes.

A Mormon once told me that I was being selfish for not having kids. Am I selfish?

So how many kids do I need to have to not be selfish anymore? What's the number? Do I need to have at least one to not be selfish or have as many as my body can handle making? They won't be raised Mormon or in any religion for that matter, does this make a difference?

I want zero kids, and that makes me selfish? So tell me, how many kids do you want me to have?

I want you to have 10 kids.

[farmerchick]

I don't think its selfish if Toast has no children. I think it would be kind and generous of her to abstain from child bearing. As for having 10 kids as some suggested, Toast wouldn't be Toast....or maybe she would be Toast...hmmmm gota think about that one.....my vote is zero population for Toast.

[Fiannan]

I don't think its selfish if Toast has no children. I think it would be kind and generous of her to abstain from child bearing. As for having 10 kids as some suggested, Toast wouldn't be Toast....or maybe she would be Toast...hmmmm gota think about that one.....my vote is zero population for Toast.

Not sure. I do believe that healthy and intelligent people should strive for large families and those without those traits should abstain, but we know nothing of someone on the internet, not even their gender.

[Elizabeth]

..................

[Aprhys]

Having kids sucks. Sorry. It's true. I have seven. My family is a blended family. Step kids, adopted kids etc. You have no time for yourself. I make over 100k and still have nothing left over. Medical bills. Gymnastics. Baseball. Fights. Holes in the wall. I never sleep because something is always wrong with one of them. Hobbies? Forget about them. Im sorry but thats the truth of it. If I had stayed with the original three kids I would be free as they have moved out! But no. I have 15 more years of raising kids at which point I will be close to death and unable to actuallu enjoy life on my terms.

[abijah]

Having kids sucks. Sorry. It's true.

Kids = power. But maybe you’re not that kind of guy? As for me, I want as many children as God will give me.

[Elizabeth]

In all probability it would be different if they were your own children.

Having kids sucks. Sorry. It's true. I have seven. My family is a blended family. Step kids, adopted kids etc.