Good question. Maybe the Presiding Bishopric takes charge while the presidency of the Seventy reconstructs the Quorum of the Twelve?
Why Rome?
- captainfearnot
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1988
Re: Why Rome?
- LukeAir2008
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2985
- Location: Highland
Re: Why Rome?
They don’t have the authority to reconstruct the Twelve and even if they did the new Quorum wouldn’t have any keys.captainfearnot wrote: ↑March 14th, 2019, 1:29 pmGood question. Maybe the Presiding Bishopric takes charge while the presidency of the Seventy reconstructs the Quorum of the Twelve?
- captainfearnot
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1988
Re: Why Rome?
Yeah, I actually don't have a clue about how any of this would work. But the keys shouldn't be a problem. If we're supposed to have them—Peter, James and John to the rescue. If not, well then I guess God wiped out all 15 apostles in one fell swoop for a reason.LukeAir2008 wrote: ↑March 14th, 2019, 1:39 pmThey don’t have the authority to reconstruct the Twelve and even if they did the new Quorum wouldn’t have any keys.captainfearnot wrote: ↑March 14th, 2019, 1:29 pmGood question. Maybe the Presiding Bishopric takes charge while the presidency of the Seventy reconstructs the Quorum of the Twelve?
- LukeAir2008
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2985
- Location: Highland
Re: Why Rome?
I’m pretty sure that only the 15 men have the keys given to them when they are ordained. If they’re lost - they’re gone. Moses, Elijah, Abraham etc would have to come back which I dont think would happen.captainfearnot wrote: ↑March 14th, 2019, 1:46 pmYeah, I actually don't have a clue about how any of this would work. But the keys shouldn't be a problem. If we're supposed to have them—Peter, James and John to the rescue. If not, well then I guess God wiped out all 15 apostles in one fell swoop for a reason.LukeAir2008 wrote: ↑March 14th, 2019, 1:39 pmThey don’t have the authority to reconstruct the Twelve and even if they did the new Quorum wouldn’t have any keys.captainfearnot wrote: ↑March 14th, 2019, 1:29 pmGood question. Maybe the Presiding Bishopric takes charge while the presidency of the Seventy reconstructs the Quorum of the Twelve?
- LukeAir2008
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2985
- Location: Highland
- Primary Outcast
- captain of 100
- Posts: 823
Re: Why Rome?
I strongly believe that President Nelson was inspired to take the Q15 to Rome, and if that is true then there must have been a significant reason for it.
1) Maybe the Catholic Church will see a huge falling out soon
2) Maybe the time of the gentiles is being completed
3) Maybe the destruction of Europe is imminent
4) I think that bloodlines have a powerful connection with conversion. Maybe the time for conversion of certain lines has been completed, and it is time for new bloodlines to be converted is beginning.
Because of President Nelson's statements about the future of the church I'm leaning towards #4.
1) Maybe the Catholic Church will see a huge falling out soon
2) Maybe the time of the gentiles is being completed
3) Maybe the destruction of Europe is imminent
4) I think that bloodlines have a powerful connection with conversion. Maybe the time for conversion of certain lines has been completed, and it is time for new bloodlines to be converted is beginning.
Because of President Nelson's statements about the future of the church I'm leaning towards #4.
- harakim
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2821
- Location: Salt Lake Megalopolis
Re: Why Rome?
What statements about the future?Primary Outcast wrote: ↑March 14th, 2019, 2:06 pm I strongly believe that President Nelson was inspired to take the Q15 to Rome, and if that is true then there must have been a significant reason for it.
1) Maybe the Catholic Church will see a huge falling out soon
2) Maybe the time of the gentiles is being completed
3) Maybe the destruction of Europe is imminent
4) I think that bloodlines have a powerful connection with conversion. Maybe the time for conversion of certain lines has been completed, and it is time for new bloodlines to be converted is beginning.
Because of President Nelson's statements about the future of the church I'm leaning towards #4.
-
Sasquatch
- captain of 50
- Posts: 87
- Location: Oregon
Re: Why Rome?
The only North American temples that offer accommodations are in Los Angeles, Mexico City, and St George.Robin Hood wrote: ↑March 11th, 2019, 4:12 pmYes we do.EmmaLee wrote: ↑March 11th, 2019, 12:42 pmYou have accommodation centers at those temples?
To be honest, until this thread I thought they all had.
For some reason, I had assumed that temples built before the 1990s, especially those outside Utah (Washington DC, Cardston, Dallas, etc), would generally have accommodations.
- BruceRGilbert
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1481
- Location: Near the "City of Trees," Idaho
Re: Why Rome?
I noted that President Nelson referred to the Pope as "his holiness."JST, James 2:1. Compare James 2:1
Members should not regard one person more highly than another.
1 My brethren, ye cannot have the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, and yet have respect to persons.
- gkearney
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 5394
Re: Why Rome?
It is standard protocol to refer to both the Roman Catholic Pope and the Pope Emeritus (Pope Benedict XVI), the Oriental Orthodox Patriarchs, the Patriarch of Constantinople, and the Dalai Lama with the title "His Holiness" or "Your Holiness".
Others that carry the title are the Karmapa, the Je Khenpo in Bhutan, the Caliph of Ahmadiyya Islam, and in Dawoodi Bohra sect of Ismaili Shia for esteemed office of Da'i Al-Mutlaq.
A female equivalent "Her Holiness" for Shinso Ito, the Head Priest of Shinnyo en Temple in Tachikawa, Tokyo
Others that carry the title are the Karmapa, the Je Khenpo in Bhutan, the Caliph of Ahmadiyya Islam, and in Dawoodi Bohra sect of Ismaili Shia for esteemed office of Da'i Al-Mutlaq.
A female equivalent "Her Holiness" for Shinso Ito, the Head Priest of Shinnyo en Temple in Tachikawa, Tokyo
- Original_Intent
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 13156
Re: Why Rome?
There is something to be said for planting your flag in the belly of the beast. Taking all of the 15 may have been symbolic or there may have been deeper reasons. Seems the Vatican has been making some moves lately towards "one world religion" regardless of their possibly good intentions, there is much in such a move to be concerned about. It is possible even that the Rome temple will cause some backlash against LDS. It seems that President Nelson is saying "This isn't simply another of dozens of temples."
- BruceRGilbert
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1481
- Location: Near the "City of Trees," Idaho
Re: Why Rome?
Pope Francis was a Jesuit with strong Jewish ties. The likelihood of the implementation of the Noahide Law under Sanhedrin jurisdiction is highly suspect. Such a condition could render Christian worship contrary to Jewish belief under the Law with the potential penalty being death - hence, setting the stage for extreme "Christian" persecution.Original_Intent wrote: ↑March 15th, 2019, 4:01 pm There is something to be said for planting your flag in the belly of the beast. Taking all of the 15 may have been symbolic or there may have been deeper reasons. Seems the Vatican has been making some moves lately towards "one world religion" regardless of their possibly good intentions, there is much in such a move to be concerned about. It is possible even that the Rome temple will cause some backlash against LDS. It seems that President Nelson is saying "This isn't simply another of dozens of temples."
-
Michelle
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1795
Re: Why Rome?
I think the location had more to do with the things we didn't see heralded.
It was made clear by some of the articles that Peter and Paul were there.
In fact, it was said that all of the apostles were there.
I believe it likely that not just all the living apostles, but the ancient apostles, the three Nephites, John the Beloved, and perhaps others were there for a meeting, maybe even Christ. Perhaps that is the significance of the photo. A record of those who were there. The acceleration of events may have to do with them coming together and speaking of how to move forward all together in their different callings at this current time and place in history.
It was made clear by some of the articles that Peter and Paul were there.
In fact, it was said that all of the apostles were there.
I believe it likely that not just all the living apostles, but the ancient apostles, the three Nephites, John the Beloved, and perhaps others were there for a meeting, maybe even Christ. Perhaps that is the significance of the photo. A record of those who were there. The acceleration of events may have to do with them coming together and speaking of how to move forward all together in their different callings at this current time and place in history.
-
sushi_chef
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3693
- Location: tokyo, jpn
Re: Why Rome?
nothing but illuminati ww3 agenda collaboration, ahmen.
""The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion… We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.
Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.
This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
"
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/soci ... plar15.htm

`
contemporary of brigham albert pike(1809 - 91)
"agentur" of the "Illuminati
https://search.yahoo.co.jp/search?ei=UT ... Illuminati

""The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion… We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.
Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.
This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
"
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/soci ... plar15.htm

`
contemporary of brigham albert pike(1809 - 91)
"agentur" of the "Illuminati
https://search.yahoo.co.jp/search?ei=UT ... Illuminati
-
Lizzy60
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 8551
Re: Why Rome?
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VCJ8lCeYH6U/ ... tled-1.jpg
The Pope probably wouldn't approve. Pres Nelson holding Peter's keys.
The Pope probably wouldn't approve. Pres Nelson holding Peter's keys.
-
sushi_chef
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 3693
- Location: tokyo, jpn
-
Dusty52
- captain of 100
- Posts: 887
Re: Why Rome?
Scotland must have close to 27,000 members the same as Italy, I can't ever imagine a temple north of the border!
It would be interesting to compare and contrast the two sets of members in terms of donations, activity rates, etc
It would be interesting to compare and contrast the two sets of members in terms of donations, activity rates, etc
-
Sasquatch
- captain of 50
- Posts: 87
- Location: Oregon
Re: Why Rome?
Italy and Scotland both have about 27,000 members.
But, Italy has ten stakes and 101 congregations, while Scotland has five stakes and 41 congregations. So unless the stakes and wards in Italy are smaller, it seems Italy's active membership is roughly twice that of Scotland.
Still I wouldn't be surprised if Scotland gets a temple sometime in the next decade. Heck, I kind of expect Ireland and Wales to have temples in the near future. If Winnipeg will soon have a temple (which will likely serve exactly one stake, and possibly a district) then why shouldn't other countries/states with one or two stakes (Singapore; Tasmania; Jamaica; Fairbanks, Alaska)
- Thinker
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 13210
- Location: The Universe - wherever that is.
Re: Why Rome?
sushi_chef wrote: ↑March 16th, 2019, 10:37 pm urrrr...ummmm...., priesthood restoration stuff!!....ummm....
~
![]()
Spoiler


