John Tavner wrote: ↑February 22nd, 2019, 12:57 pmI follow somewhat along Stahura's way of thinking. It wasn't until about a year ago I began to really read the scriptures, not only read them, but prayed for understanding as I've read them, moreover humbling myself and striving for a broken heart and contrite spirit while I read them. As I have read and begun to believe in the scriptures I have noticed some things don't line up. The words really are delicious and sweet. They are filling to the soul! As an aside, when I speak my goal isn't to draw people away from the President of the Church or to have people lose their testimony. I have the view that if it draws you closer to the Savior do it! As Stahura said, the Doctrine of Christ is the MOST important thing and for me, I've noticed that too often it's teachings are woefully absent or misunderstood in local wards and areas - and I have along with the other scriptures he mentioined, teaches us how we are to live our lives. It teaches us what we are supposed to do and it taught me what I haven't done. My words are only to warn us to repent. I still attend my meetings, I still testify of Christ and hold callings. I don't run around telling people not to listen to the President of the Church, but I do teach them the words of Christ, for they are sweet.Stahura wrote: ↑February 22nd, 2019, 12:14 amTo give you better insight into my thoughts, I’ll give youRand wrote: ↑February 21st, 2019, 8:56 pm I appreciate the tone of this most recent interchange above. Thanks to those involved.
You could help me gain greater understanding of your points if you would go one step further and answer a couple other questions.
As I read your posts, a couple of thoughts come to mind. The statement from the Lord that the "church was under condemnation" was given in the 84th section of the DC. After that time, God said "God is not pleased with some in the church.", "the lord commands the church to gather", "prepare the church for the redemption of Zion", "scriptures are published to build up the church", "Presidency is upheld by the confidence, faith and prayers of the church", "the Twelve build up and regulate the church in all nations", "duty of the President of the High Priesthood to preside over the whole church", and I could go on and on.
It seems that even thought the whole church was put under condemnation, they were not put away, it remained The Church of Jesus Christ.
So we then have the transition from Joseph to Brigham as the "President of the High Priesthood.
Do you think the keys remained active and viable in the Church of Jesus Christ with Brigham at the head?
And, if you do, did they continue after that?
I would make an observation about your comments. They seem to imply that "The Church" is made up of the whole of its members, or that The Church as an organization, with keys and priesthood, has fallen. Which of these is true, or if you don't agree with either, what is the reality in that regard according to your opinion.
Some background info.
Among the Presidents that followed Joseph’s death, it appears that the “transfiguration” of Brigham Young did not happen, at least the sources saying such a thing happened would never be accepted by any legitimate historian if we were discussing any other topic. The “succession crisis” boiled down to the remaining leaders reasoning among themselves util they settled with Brigham as the President once more.
Continuing on the succession over the years, it doesn’t appear every President was set apart for their calling. For years their belief was apparently that they were already set apart when they became Apostles and it would be redundant to do so upon becoming President of the Church. Then a couple of them were set apart, apparently they thought it necessary, but then another one wasn’t set apart again.( I can give more details if you want, I’m just giving you the general idea) .
In addition to that, they did not know who would become the next President. It most certainly was not the “most senior Apostle”. The rule they abided by changed many times. The brethren had debates about it, they comment about the topic in their journals, there was no revelation telling them to just go with the Senior Apostle. Eventually they decided on that and it became the precedent .( After John Taylor I believe). I’m not sure if you want sources or
Not, I just don’t want to derail the thread into something else .
Now, given all that, I need to make it clear that I think God does not always operate in black and white . I think he can give anybody power anytime anywhere.
I don’t think it would really matter if they didn’t set someone apart if God truly did call a man and bless him to be his Prophet.
The thing that might annoy some people is that I really haven’t come to any solid conclusion.
I think that the polygamy they practiced was an abomination that did not please God, it’s my opinion that they have operated largely without the type of Revelation that I used to think they receive(and what most members assume as well).
I don’t know if they were all called of God, I don’t know if a portion of them were called of God. I hope they were.
I think it’s probable that even in the event that God was displeased with all of them that the keys could have carried on, allowing them to still push the church forward. That would mean that even if all of the church Presidents weren’t “true Prophets” in the sense that Joseph was a prophet, they still had the proper keys to operate.
This probably sounds like nonsense to you, but as I have never come to a conclusion on what I believe has happened with keys, I can only offer you the things going through my mind on the topic.
If I go down the other route, and assume that all is dandy, they were all called of God and the keys absolutely remain no question, then I’m left to ponder on why we have an extremely watered down version of the Gospel we see in the scriptures and in Joseph’s time. This path delves into other paths like Priesthood power, manifestations of the Holy Ghost, revelations and the lack thereof. Again, I don’t want to derail the thread, but to me it’s obvious that these things are lacking in our church(in my own life as well, with the exception of some periods in my life).
Hence why I don’t really know how to give a straight answer to your question. I hope this wall of text gives you insight .
I guess again, it depends on what “fallen” means. Condemned but not cast off and burned?
Whether or not you believe the church is no longer under condemnation, we know there was at least a period where the church was under condemnation. Was the church “fallen” during that time? What was it’s status? I don’t know.
Truth be told, this topic isn’t extraordinarily important to me. I’ve spent most of my past 2 years reading and rereading the same verses in the Book of Mormon, studying a single topic(The Doctrine of Christ) and it’s really the only topic I’m passionate about because it’s the only topic I can say I DO KNOW, everything else I have received no answers or explanations from God . My Anchor is Christ, and the answer to everything we are discussing wouldn’t rattle my anchor in any way, hence why I just don’t have a passion for it.
Edit: List of scriptures I referenced that I prefer to spend time on.
a. Mosiah 4:2-12,
b. Mosiah 5:1-9
c. Alma 36:1-26
d. Helaman 5:35-45
e. 3 Nephi 11:31-40
f. 3 Nephi 19: 8-30
g. Enos 1:2-12
h. 2 Nephi 31:5-21
i. 2 Nephi 32:1-7
j. Moroni 7:35-48
k. Moroni 10:8-33
l. 1 Nephi 2:16
m. Alma 5:6-49
n. Alma 18:41 - Alma 19:1-29
o. Alma 22:14-23
p. Moses 6:64-68
q. Acts 2:1-5
I have, through much fasting and prayer, received through the Lord an answer that the church organization as we know it will collapse. It must in order for Zion to be created. We as a people are living in iniquity. There is no way around that. We have become like unto the Jews of old where we beleive that the ordinances themselves save us. I don't condemn anyone for these views, I had them my entire life until recently. Truly reading the doctrine of Christ teaches us there is so much more. Baptism is more than just the ordinance, it requires an actual chagne of heart, receiving the Holy Ghost is not something that is automatically given just because someone lays their hands on your head - there is much more required. All these truths are found in the scriptures. Almost every single book in the Book of Mormon teaches us how to seek God. They give examples. The scriptures are plain, but until I submitted to the Lord in all things(a requirement found in the doctrine of CHrist) I was blind to the plainness of the scriptures and the scales of darkness have slowly fallen from my mind. Even now I struggle because of traditions of men. I am constantly wanting to seek out men to learn about God, rather than me realizing that if I want to learn about God, I can ask Him directly. That is what is so powerful about the scriptures, that is what is so powerful about the Doctrine of Christ, we are to do ALL things the Spirit tells us to do, we must constantly submit and give up everything we want and let go of preconceived notions and then the Lord guides us as we ask. Every question I have when I seek after man's interpretation - the thought of "have ye inquired of the Lord" often comes to mind. If I haven't how iniquitous am I? I am like Laman and Lemuel. Anyways, like I said, I don't want to drive anyone from the church or make them lose their faith in Christ, I want them to make Christ the center of their lives and if they do, they will rejoice and find peace even in the midst of turmoil. He is mighty to save and only asks that we come unto Him, not to others. Others are merely meant to teach us to come unto Him - in all things.
"I have, through much fasting and prayer, received through the Lord an answer that the church organization as we know it will collapse. It must in order for Zion to be created"
This is where you appear to be going totally contrary to myriads of revelation both written and spoken that testify the essential Priesthood keys will in fact continue unabated to be held by the presiding President of the High Priesthood and those presiding Quorums of the church so designated until that time when Adam will return to bestow those rightful presiding keys back to the Savior in preparation for His millenial reign. The church will continue to to be beneficiaries of those Priesthood keys uninterrupted until that time. Many members will fall but those Priesthood keys will remain intact with those holding those necessary Priesthood offices. Am I understanding you correctly that you feel the Lord is telling you otherwise?
