5G
-
I AM
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2456
Re: 5G
TURN OFF YOUR WIFI ROUTER BEFORE BED!
"it is a perfect stealth weapon
and when governments don't like a group of people - they microwave them."
talks about wifi and just how dangerous it is.
women should listen to this part.
"genetically damaged children?
6min 20sec
"it is a perfect stealth weapon
and when governments don't like a group of people - they microwave them."
talks about wifi and just how dangerous it is.
women should listen to this part.
"genetically damaged children?
6min 20sec
-
I AM
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2456
Re: 5G
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... rns-a.html
'The deployment of 5G, or fifth generation cellular technology, constitutes a massive experiment on the health of all species,' he told Daily Mail Online.
Because MMWs are weaker than microwaves, they are predominantly absorbed by the skin, meaning their distribution is quite focused there,
'Since skin contains capillaries and nerve endings, MMW bio-effects may be transmitted through molecular mechanisms by the skin or through the nervous system,' Dr Moskowitz writes on his blog.
He also told Daily Mail Online that he's concerned that '5G will use high-band frequencies, or millimeter waves, that may affect the eyes, the testes, the skin, the peripheral nervous system, and sweat glands.'
'Millimeter waves can also make some pathogens resistant to antibiotics,' he added.
-----------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 3917308143
The spread of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) is rising and health effects are still under investigation. RF-EMF promote oxidative stress, a condition involved in cancer onset, in several acute and chronic diseases and in vascular homeostasis. Although some evidences are still controversial, the WHO IARC classified RF-EMF as “possible carcinogenic to humans”, and more recent studies suggested reproductive, metabolic and neurologic effects of RF-EMF, which are also able to alter bacterial antibiotic resistance. In this evolving scenario, although the biological effects of 5G communication systems are very scarcely investigated, an international action plan for the development of 5G networks has started, with a forthcoming increment in devices and density of small cells, and with the future use of millimeter waves (MMW). Preliminary observations showed that MMW increase skin temperature, alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes, could generate ocular damages, affect neuro-muscular dynamics. Further studies are needed to better and independently explore the health effects of RF-EMF in general and of MMW in particular. However, available findings seem sufficient to demonstrate the existence of biomedical effects, to invoke the precautionary principle, to define exposed subjects as potentially vulnerable and to revise existing limits. An adequate knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms linking RF-EMF exposure to health risk should also be useful in the current clinical practice, in particular in consideration of evidences pointing to extrinsic factors as heavy contributors to cancer risk and to the progressive epidemiological growth of noncommunicable diseases.
'The deployment of 5G, or fifth generation cellular technology, constitutes a massive experiment on the health of all species,' he told Daily Mail Online.
Because MMWs are weaker than microwaves, they are predominantly absorbed by the skin, meaning their distribution is quite focused there,
'Since skin contains capillaries and nerve endings, MMW bio-effects may be transmitted through molecular mechanisms by the skin or through the nervous system,' Dr Moskowitz writes on his blog.
He also told Daily Mail Online that he's concerned that '5G will use high-band frequencies, or millimeter waves, that may affect the eyes, the testes, the skin, the peripheral nervous system, and sweat glands.'
'Millimeter waves can also make some pathogens resistant to antibiotics,' he added.
-----------------------------------------------------------
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 3917308143
The spread of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) is rising and health effects are still under investigation. RF-EMF promote oxidative stress, a condition involved in cancer onset, in several acute and chronic diseases and in vascular homeostasis. Although some evidences are still controversial, the WHO IARC classified RF-EMF as “possible carcinogenic to humans”, and more recent studies suggested reproductive, metabolic and neurologic effects of RF-EMF, which are also able to alter bacterial antibiotic resistance. In this evolving scenario, although the biological effects of 5G communication systems are very scarcely investigated, an international action plan for the development of 5G networks has started, with a forthcoming increment in devices and density of small cells, and with the future use of millimeter waves (MMW). Preliminary observations showed that MMW increase skin temperature, alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes, could generate ocular damages, affect neuro-muscular dynamics. Further studies are needed to better and independently explore the health effects of RF-EMF in general and of MMW in particular. However, available findings seem sufficient to demonstrate the existence of biomedical effects, to invoke the precautionary principle, to define exposed subjects as potentially vulnerable and to revise existing limits. An adequate knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms linking RF-EMF exposure to health risk should also be useful in the current clinical practice, in particular in consideration of evidences pointing to extrinsic factors as heavy contributors to cancer risk and to the progressive epidemiological growth of noncommunicable diseases.
-
moving2zion
- captain of 100
- Posts: 560
Re: 5G
For the last 100 yrs we have known that equipment dealing with high rates of emissions has negative impacts when you are in close proximity. Radio towers are required to be surrounded by chain link fence, Ham radio operators are limited in the power output that they can use while transmitting. Truckers using CBs are limited so they don't 'blow out' the radios in trucks that they are passing. Have you ever seen the effect of military equipment when it is jamming over a wide area? The shower of sparks coming off of antennas is kind of cool. As a boyscout one of my leaders was teaching how to use his radio. He had a truck mounted rig with the antennae on the back. A cat happened to be on the bumper and rubbed against the antennae when he went to transmit. Fried the cat, made the brother jump out of his pants.
Where I see the danger with 5G is that you take every passive send receive device that normally operates in short bursts when in use for short periods and these now become full time dedicated antennas both transmitting and receiving non stop 24 hrs a day. I can think of six such devices just in my own home. Where the human body can handle the current daily increase in radiation across all levels it is spread out and we are in environments throughout the day where our exposure is limited. Now we will be taking a bath in radiation non stop. When I say radiation I mean the increased exposure of radio waves across the spectrum. 5G takes advantage of a much wider frequency band than is being advertised as it taps into legacy devices operating at different frequencies to boost its bandwidth and location coverage capability. 5G is not locked into one band with only certain equipment that can tie into it. It is an entire system. Think of it as the previous generations each had increased capability but they stayed within their level. At first there were just grade school kids talking to each other, Then junior high kids where disseminating the information- more advanced but still limited in scope. Then high school kids where given the chance to move the information (4G) but they were not tapping into the other age groups. 5G is not only bumping it up to the university level (vastly increasing capability) but tying all of the other age groups in simultaneously to move the information. Now you have massively increased in your capability, your coverage, and as a bonus your designee (the university level carrier in this case) controls the inputs and outputs at the lower levels.
Folks don't realize that as they sign on to contracts for G service they will be surrendering control over and access to all the transmit and receive devices connected to the overall network that they currently possess. (Many folks have already given up control of capture, send, and receive functions such as microphones, TVs, and phones- they just don't realize it.)
I was perusing another discussion board recently hoping to find answers on this and I realized how oblivious people are to this and the far reaching impacts. That was a board dedicated to integrating wireless technology into the hobby world, R/C planes, Toy Trains run wirelessly [Lionel's Legacy System, MTH Protosound, DCC] and growing in popularity every day- drones. Think of a family purchasing a drone- the teenage son flies it in a park using his phone. The drones camera picks up video of an automobile accident and sends it via 5G through the phone. Local police departments with the correct software data mine the internet and in just a few moments video recorded by your son is sent to the responding officer to evaluate while approaching the crash. The individual at fault finds out through their lawyer that the police obtained video shot by your families drone and now you are being sued for invasion of privacy- which falls under the laws adopted in most states that you cannot record another person without their consent. Of course there is a lot of legalese that could be gotten into here. The point is you now become an information collector and disseminator unconsciously on behalf of someone that does not share your values or goals (the negative impacts of the radiation exposure on our bodies is just the beginning).
This is a big step closer to centralized information control, manipulation, and process management on so many levels. Think of the movie IRobot with Will Smith. The new robots come with an uplink were they are all centrally managed and updated on the users behalf of course. 5G bypasses that by getting you to surrender all other Robots (routers, switches, blue tooth devices, phones, wired house and vehicular devices) to the grid for manipulation of information movement and outcome control. There is a reason that 5G is being rolled out quickly in China- it is tied directly to the social credit score that the Chinese government is using to manipulate its people. Imagine what North Korea would be like if the Kims had had this technology 30 yrs ago. Now it is being used here at home.
I could go on, but I would prefer to retire rather than being fired.
Where I see the danger with 5G is that you take every passive send receive device that normally operates in short bursts when in use for short periods and these now become full time dedicated antennas both transmitting and receiving non stop 24 hrs a day. I can think of six such devices just in my own home. Where the human body can handle the current daily increase in radiation across all levels it is spread out and we are in environments throughout the day where our exposure is limited. Now we will be taking a bath in radiation non stop. When I say radiation I mean the increased exposure of radio waves across the spectrum. 5G takes advantage of a much wider frequency band than is being advertised as it taps into legacy devices operating at different frequencies to boost its bandwidth and location coverage capability. 5G is not locked into one band with only certain equipment that can tie into it. It is an entire system. Think of it as the previous generations each had increased capability but they stayed within their level. At first there were just grade school kids talking to each other, Then junior high kids where disseminating the information- more advanced but still limited in scope. Then high school kids where given the chance to move the information (4G) but they were not tapping into the other age groups. 5G is not only bumping it up to the university level (vastly increasing capability) but tying all of the other age groups in simultaneously to move the information. Now you have massively increased in your capability, your coverage, and as a bonus your designee (the university level carrier in this case) controls the inputs and outputs at the lower levels.
Folks don't realize that as they sign on to contracts for G service they will be surrendering control over and access to all the transmit and receive devices connected to the overall network that they currently possess. (Many folks have already given up control of capture, send, and receive functions such as microphones, TVs, and phones- they just don't realize it.)
I was perusing another discussion board recently hoping to find answers on this and I realized how oblivious people are to this and the far reaching impacts. That was a board dedicated to integrating wireless technology into the hobby world, R/C planes, Toy Trains run wirelessly [Lionel's Legacy System, MTH Protosound, DCC] and growing in popularity every day- drones. Think of a family purchasing a drone- the teenage son flies it in a park using his phone. The drones camera picks up video of an automobile accident and sends it via 5G through the phone. Local police departments with the correct software data mine the internet and in just a few moments video recorded by your son is sent to the responding officer to evaluate while approaching the crash. The individual at fault finds out through their lawyer that the police obtained video shot by your families drone and now you are being sued for invasion of privacy- which falls under the laws adopted in most states that you cannot record another person without their consent. Of course there is a lot of legalese that could be gotten into here. The point is you now become an information collector and disseminator unconsciously on behalf of someone that does not share your values or goals (the negative impacts of the radiation exposure on our bodies is just the beginning).
This is a big step closer to centralized information control, manipulation, and process management on so many levels. Think of the movie IRobot with Will Smith. The new robots come with an uplink were they are all centrally managed and updated on the users behalf of course. 5G bypasses that by getting you to surrender all other Robots (routers, switches, blue tooth devices, phones, wired house and vehicular devices) to the grid for manipulation of information movement and outcome control. There is a reason that 5G is being rolled out quickly in China- it is tied directly to the social credit score that the Chinese government is using to manipulate its people. Imagine what North Korea would be like if the Kims had had this technology 30 yrs ago. Now it is being used here at home.
I could go on, but I would prefer to retire rather than being fired.
- gigarath24
- captain of 100
- Posts: 503
- Location: Babylon
Re: 5G
5G is not in and of itself a bad thing, it's simply a tool to be used. Net Neutrality and the Internet of Things on the other hand...
-
Michelle
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1795
Re: 5G
Michelle wrote: ↑May 23rd, 2019, 11:28 pm What if no one had been warned about Hurricane Sandy before it hit? What would have been the loss of life and property?
How much have we relied on weather forecasting to give people time to get out of the way and prepare for the hurricanes of the last few years?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... e8d94454e5
What if, suddenly, decades of progress in weather prediction was reversed and monster storms that we currently see coming for days were no longer foreseeable? The toll on life, property and the economy would be enormous. Yet the government’s science agencies say such a loss in forecast accuracy could happen if the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. wireless industry get their way.
Both the FCC and the wireless industry are racing to deploy 5G technology, which will deliver information at speeds 100 times faster than today’s mobile networks. But scientists have found this technology could interfere with critical satellite data used in weather forecasting, pitting the interests of science and safety against a pressing national priority.
The FCC and the government’s science agencies, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA, have battled over this issue for several years.These microwave sensors, Gerth wrote in an email, transmit important water vapor data at a frequency of 23.8 gigahertz, where they are potentially vulnerable to interference. In March, FCC auctioned off spectrum for wireless transmission in the adjacent 24 gigahertz band.
The proximity of the two bands could expose the water vapor data to out-of-band emissions deeming them unreliable. Gerth said “it is undisputed” that this water vapor data is necessary for weather prediction models “to produce the most accurate forecast.”But, testifying before the House Science Committee on May 16, Jacobs told members of Congress that the interference could result in a 30 percent reduction in forecast accuracy. “If you look back in time to see when our forecast skill was roughly 30 percent less than it was today, it’s somewhere around 1980,″ he said.
With this reduced forecast skill, the European model would not have predicted 2012′s Superstorm Sandy hitting the Northeast coast several days in advance, Jacobs said. Instead, the model would have steered the storm out to sea. Lead time to prepare for the storm would have been cut short.
-
JohnnyL
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 9982
Re: 5G
What to do...
(search for more info on all of these things)
Turn off, or better, unplug when not using lots of things.
Make a basic Faraday cage around your smart meter, wifi, etc. Aluminum foil will usually do the trick.
Muscle test to find out if there are energy/sound problems affecting you/ your dwelling. Some might be shocking (ELF from a fridge), others expected (untreated smart meter).
Use orgonite and similar energy devices, everywhere.
(search for more info on all of these things)
Turn off, or better, unplug when not using lots of things.
Make a basic Faraday cage around your smart meter, wifi, etc. Aluminum foil will usually do the trick.
Muscle test to find out if there are energy/sound problems affecting you/ your dwelling. Some might be shocking (ELF from a fridge), others expected (untreated smart meter).
Use orgonite and similar energy devices, everywhere.
-
JohnnyL
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 9982
Re: 5G
More than one way to skin a cat, lol.Michelle wrote: ↑May 24th, 2019, 10:06 amMichelle wrote: ↑May 23rd, 2019, 11:28 pm What if no one had been warned about Hurricane Sandy before it hit? What would have been the loss of life and property?
How much have we relied on weather forecasting to give people time to get out of the way and prepare for the hurricanes of the last few years?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... e8d94454e5
What if, suddenly, decades of progress in weather prediction was reversed and monster storms that we currently see coming for days were no longer foreseeable? The toll on life, property and the economy would be enormous. Yet the government’s science agencies say such a loss in forecast accuracy could happen if the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. wireless industry get their way.
Both the FCC and the wireless industry are racing to deploy 5G technology, which will deliver information at speeds 100 times faster than today’s mobile networks. But scientists have found this technology could interfere with critical satellite data used in weather forecasting, pitting the interests of science and safety against a pressing national priority.
The FCC and the government’s science agencies, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA, have battled over this issue for several years.These microwave sensors, Gerth wrote in an email, transmit important water vapor data at a frequency of 23.8 gigahertz, where they are potentially vulnerable to interference. In March, FCC auctioned off spectrum for wireless transmission in the adjacent 24 gigahertz band.
The proximity of the two bands could expose the water vapor data to out-of-band emissions deeming them unreliable. Gerth said “it is undisputed” that this water vapor data is necessary for weather prediction models “to produce the most accurate forecast.”But, testifying before the House Science Committee on May 16, Jacobs told members of Congress that the interference could result in a 30 percent reduction in forecast accuracy. “If you look back in time to see when our forecast skill was roughly 30 percent less than it was today, it’s somewhere around 1980,″ he said.
With this reduced forecast skill, the European model would not have predicted 2012′s Superstorm Sandy hitting the Northeast coast several days in advance, Jacobs said. Instead, the model would have steered the storm out to sea. Lead time to prepare for the storm would have been cut short.
It might take all of them just to slow it down, but 5G--and everything after it--no matter what, is coming.
TPTB are HAPPY there will be worse weather forecasting for the public.
-
Michelle
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1795
Re: 5G
I agree that 5G can't be stopped. I believe we should all do what we can to mitigate the risk to ourselves and our families. I believe that worse weather forecasting will contribute to the destruction of the last days.JohnnyL wrote: ↑May 24th, 2019, 10:48 amMore than one way to skin a cat, lol.Michelle wrote: ↑May 24th, 2019, 10:06 amMichelle wrote: ↑May 23rd, 2019, 11:28 pm What if no one had been warned about Hurricane Sandy before it hit? What would have been the loss of life and property?
How much have we relied on weather forecasting to give people time to get out of the way and prepare for the hurricanes of the last few years?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/ ... e8d94454e5
What if, suddenly, decades of progress in weather prediction was reversed and monster storms that we currently see coming for days were no longer foreseeable? The toll on life, property and the economy would be enormous. Yet the government’s science agencies say such a loss in forecast accuracy could happen if the Federal Communications Commission and the U.S. wireless industry get their way.
Both the FCC and the wireless industry are racing to deploy 5G technology, which will deliver information at speeds 100 times faster than today’s mobile networks. But scientists have found this technology could interfere with critical satellite data used in weather forecasting, pitting the interests of science and safety against a pressing national priority.
The FCC and the government’s science agencies, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA, have battled over this issue for several years.These microwave sensors, Gerth wrote in an email, transmit important water vapor data at a frequency of 23.8 gigahertz, where they are potentially vulnerable to interference. In March, FCC auctioned off spectrum for wireless transmission in the adjacent 24 gigahertz band.
The proximity of the two bands could expose the water vapor data to out-of-band emissions deeming them unreliable. Gerth said “it is undisputed” that this water vapor data is necessary for weather prediction models “to produce the most accurate forecast.”But, testifying before the House Science Committee on May 16, Jacobs told members of Congress that the interference could result in a 30 percent reduction in forecast accuracy. “If you look back in time to see when our forecast skill was roughly 30 percent less than it was today, it’s somewhere around 1980,″ he said.
With this reduced forecast skill, the European model would not have predicted 2012′s Superstorm Sandy hitting the Northeast coast several days in advance, Jacobs said. Instead, the model would have steered the storm out to sea. Lead time to prepare for the storm would have been cut short.
It might take all of them just to slow it down, but 5G--and everything after it--no matter what, is coming.
TPTB are HAPPY there will be worse weather forecasting for the public.
There are many things that people have forgotten about weather forecasting that don't require technology. Here is one example:
I think that some old methods will be useful, if we can rediscover them, but with weather modification being a thing: it may confuse the signs nature gives for weather.A weather stick is a traditional means of weather prediction used by some Native Americans. It consists of a balsam fir or birch rod mounted outdoors which twists upwards in low humidity and downwards in high-humidity environments.[1] These sticks were first used by the Native Americans of the American northeast and the Canadian east and southeast, who noted the behavior of dry branches prior to the arrival of weather changes. The weather stick is a rare example of a weather prediction tool which predates the mercury barometer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_stick
- kittycat51
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1866
- Location: Looking for Zion
Re: 5G
https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-05-19- ... anity.html
From the article:
“And you all need to understand that these are military weapons,” the film states. “These are assault frequencies. If you garner nothing more than that, that’s what you need to know. It’s microwave radiation warfare, is what this is.”
...It might be easier for some to simply convince themselves that 5G, despite its “side effects,” is still for our benefit. But as this film reveals, 5G represents the worst kind of microwave radiation known to mankind...
"...We’re told in the IEEE Beamforming document that this technology cooked your eyes like eggs in World War II.”
If you’re still not convinced, consider the words of former Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman and Telecom Industry Lobbyist, Tom Wheeler, who during a speech he gave at The National Press Club offered up intentionally ominous words about the full extent of 5G’s purpose in the world.
“The first generation wireless, 1G, was voice,” he stated. “The second generation, 2G, allowed both talk and text. The third generation, 3G, the internet, in a limited way. And today’s technology, 4G, completed that digital migration. But if anyone tells you that they know the details of what 5G is going to become, run the other way.”

