This may seem facetious of me, but I’m just going to put this here:Alaris wrote: ↑November 27th, 2018, 12:40 pmThanks for chiming in with your opinion. I do agree there is some nuance the Doctrine in Covenants. As for degrees within the Celestial Kingdom, whether you want to say there are degrees above the CK or degrees within in the CK, D&C 130 is pretty clear that once you are in the CK, there is additional learning pertaining to higher orders. I'll chime in with my thoughts on other evidences of what this means and my personal take later. Thanks again.stillwater wrote: ↑November 27th, 2018, 12:23 pmI labeled your criticism of the blogger as "condemnation". You can read that word however you want. I guess you chose to read it in a way that you disagree with. I meant it just as a straightforward description of your dismissal of the author's thesis, not a consignment of him to eternal damnation or something.Alaris wrote: ↑November 27th, 2018, 12:12 pmUnless there really are degrees of separation within the Celestial Kingdom, which absolutely there are imho. If they do exist, you can certainly learn about the "higher order of kingdoms" within the Celestial Kingdom from within the Celestial Kingdom. Could there be kingdoms above and beyond the Celestial? Sure. However, that interpretation certainly isn't the only interpretation here.stillwater wrote: ↑November 27th, 2018, 11:59 am
If you are standing in the celestial kingdom (singular), and you are given a white stone so you can learn about a "higher order of kingdoms", then the "kingdoms" you are to learn about are not the celestial kingdom. They are of a "higher order" than "the celestial kingdom".
lol, take it down a notch. Nobody is condemning anyone here. This is a friendly discussion, and obviously there is no pointed revelation on what the three degrees are. There are two scriptures that indicate there are degrees within the Celestial Kingdom. Not only do they both have to be explained away for there not to be, we have to account for the many prophets who have come and went who allowed this scripture to persist:stillwater wrote: ↑November 27th, 2018, 11:59 am You're trying to make the text say something it doesn't, then condemning the blog's author for not making the same mistake.
D&C 131:1 In the celestial glory there are three heavens or degrees;
2 And in order to obtain the highest, a man must enter into this order of the priesthood [meaning the new and everlasting covenant of marriage];
3 And if he does not, he cannot obtain it.
4 He may enter into the other, but that is the end of his kingdom; he cannot have an increase.
Neither of those two "scriptures" (read: secondhand summaries written by scribes never reviewed by Joseph or intended for canonization) demands a reading of multiple glories within the Celestial kingdom. They have both been abundantly and clearly "explained away" in this thread.
And we are no more obligated to account for multiple church leaders' acceptance of this tradition than we are obligated to explain the many other non-scriptural traditions that have been accepted as orthodoxy and perpetuated by leaders. A prophet is only a prophet when he is acting as such. The rest of the time he is as liable as anyone else to believe and pass on traditions of his upbringing. Observe the cataclysmic rejection of Joseph Smith's Elijah doctrine and its wholesale replacement by an entirely different doctrine. Why hasn't any leader since Brigham Young and Orson Pratt (who formulated the replacement doctrine) corrected the error? Why does the replacement doctrine find place in our manuals and discourse while Joseph's doctrines remain unread and unbelieved? Was Joseph wrong? The answer is: Because that's how people and institutions work. They are fallible. Their acceptance of a doctrine doesn't make it true, nor does their opposition to a doctrine make it false.
Has anyone asked Benjamin Franklin Johnson, Joseph’s close friend, at whose house Joseph was when the revelation was given according to the William Clayton journal? His remiscenses, of which there are two versions, may shed some light.
Okay, you may resume your thread and look into or ignore this lead as you please. Though there are certainly higher kingdoms of which we know nothing both within and above the Celestial that is our goal, I won’t go into that here.
I must add though, that every knee bowing and every tongue confessing that Jesus is the Christ is only the basic requirement for entering the kingdom of God as a citizen of that kingdom, which is the telestial level. The rulers of that kingdom are priest-kings, an ecclesiastical body that is made up of a mere handful of people like a handful of sand compared to the beaches of the world, which is the Celestial level. This is all in D&C 76. Just because their baptisms are done vicariously means nothing to their worthiness and willingness to enter said covenants. Most will not be allowed for they never knew Him.

