Page 2 of 2

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 25th, 2018, 4:22 pm
by jdt
Craig Johnson wrote: March 25th, 2018, 10:40 am
jdt wrote: March 25th, 2018, 7:21 am Proclaiming the necessity of obtaining the Second Comforter in this life is chump change. Denver said that Christ is the prototype of the saved man. He said that we need to be precisely what Jesus is and nothing else. Jesus did a whole lot more than see His Father during his mortal lifetime. And Denver has the audacity to claim that we need to do all that too or else we are not saved. And note that he said "saved" and not "exalted". And he also claims that this concept is part of the leading items of the religion which he professes to believe and that it embraces the important doctrine of salvation.
Since I am not a member of your church, I will let those who are state whether this far more expansive view is in line with current church teachings.
I do not understand what you mean by "far more expansive view" your other comments don't appear to bear this out in your discourse. If I understood that perhaps I could comment correctly on your post? Maybe I am somehow missing the connection to that statement.
Hi Craig,
Sorry, I always err on the side of being too short rather than being overly talkative. What I mean is this: in your mind or on paper make a list of say the first 25 things that come to mind that Jesus did in his life. Just whatever you think of when you think of Him. Okay. Now ask yourself this question, can you be precisely what He is and nothing else, without doing the same things that He did? And seriously think about it, the first question you can answer quickly, this one is a deeper question.
To me the answer to the second question, is a clear no. You must in fact do what He did in order to be precisely what He is. Just as He did only what He saw His Father do, we must do the same.
So then that leaves me back to the first question, what did Jesus do? If I must do precisely what Jesus did in order be saved, that list has on it a couple of items that are far more difficult than converse face to face with God in this lifetime. This is what I meant by far more expansive view.

Jesus sacrificed Himself to save an entire creation. I believe that:
It is in vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are heirs with those, or can be heirs with them, who have offered their all in sacrifice, and by this means obtained faith in God and favor with him so as to obtain eternal life, unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice, and through that offering obtain the knowledge that they are accepted of him.
To me this indicates that I too must offer the same sacrifice that Jesus did in order to be saved as He is saved. And people in this thread are discussing something comparatively much simpler: do we need to see God and commune with Him face to face in this life? It seems trivial compared to the fuller claims being made. Kind of like when Christians accuse Mormons of being polytheistic because we believe Jesus and Heavenly Father are separate beings. Really?! Just wait til you hear about Heavenly Mother and the likelihood that Heavenly Father also has a Father...

So now I turn things back over to you. And yes, there are obvious follow up questions. If you or anyone else is interested in those topics, please ask the questions. Otherwise I will just retreat back to lurking.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 25th, 2018, 4:33 pm
by jdt
investigator wrote: March 25th, 2018, 8:28 am
DesertWonderer2 wrote: March 25th, 2018, 8:20 am Denver Snuffer has corrupted the true gosple of Jesus Christ. Do yourself a favor and stay away from him, his doctrine and his followers.
Actually, Jdt is quoting Joseph Smith not Snuffer.
To be fair, I believe the concept taught by Elder McConkie that you can gain a witness of things for yourself and make the words that were originally spoken by others your own testimony. And Denver has indeed spoken at length to reinforce the concepts taught in the Lectures on Faith.
I confess that there was some part of it to see if people would condemn the words because they were attributed to Denver rather than to Joseph. And I should probably not play mind games with people. But hey props for knowing the Lectures well enough to identify the source.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 25th, 2018, 5:13 pm
by Kingdom of ZION
Arenera wrote: March 24th, 2018, 2:30 pm
BTH&T wrote: March 24th, 2018, 2:00 pm
Arenera wrote: March 24th, 2018, 11:12 am
Jesus already saved you, do you accept it?

Nephi has the sealing power, i’m sure his prayers are listened to.
That sure has a born again tone to it.

Basics, we each have come to earth and received a body.
We each have been saved, meaning we all have immortality as a free gift because of the Savoir.
We each have an opportunity to receive eternal glory and be reunited with our Father in Heaven by making the atonement effective in our lives. This is accomplished by faith, repentance and obedience.

Sealing is based on faithfulness.

There are 2 deaths, spiritual and physical. The Savoir conquered both!

Are you only concerned with one?
Do you believe you can sin and not repent and still receive blessings of the Celestial Kingdom because of sealing power?
Have you been good enough to get into the Celestial Kingdom?

Let’s say so, but one of you children or grandchildren veered off and can’t make it.

What are you going to do?

This thread is about only a few making it. I reject that.
Arenera, my dear... you are free to think whatever you want!

However, the scriptures are clear, both Bible and Book of Mormon, that wide is the way, and many go in thereat, but strait is the way, and narrow, and few their be that find it. When they asked the about this doctrine during His ministry, He basically said, then you best get started and seek it with all your might.

Relations are not children, but adults, and they have to work out their Exaltation individually. When Lucifer walk right up to the Eternal Test and said no thank G_d, I have a better plan... how many wives and posterity do you think he had? They will all have to come into a mortality like this and be resealed up into the eternities. Marriage is only had in this world, not the higher kingdoms to come!

Shalom, Shalom

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 25th, 2018, 6:20 pm
by Craig Johnson
jdt wrote: March 25th, 2018, 4:22 pm
Craig Johnson wrote: March 25th, 2018, 10:40 am
jdt wrote: March 25th, 2018, 7:21 am Proclaiming the necessity of obtaining the Second Comforter in this life is chump change. Denver said that Christ is the prototype of the saved man. He said that we need to be precisely what Jesus is and nothing else. Jesus did a whole lot more than see His Father during his mortal lifetime. And Denver has the audacity to claim that we need to do all that too or else we are not saved. And note that he said "saved" and not "exalted". And he also claims that this concept is part of the leading items of the religion which he professes to believe and that it embraces the important doctrine of salvation.
Since I am not a member of your church, I will let those who are state whether this far more expansive view is in line with current church teachings.
I do not understand what you mean by "far more expansive view" your other comments don't appear to bear this out in your discourse. If I understood that perhaps I could comment correctly on your post? Maybe I am somehow missing the connection to that statement.
Hi Craig,
Sorry, I always err on the side of being too short rather than being overly talkative. What I mean is this: in your mind or on paper make a list of say the first 25 things that come to mind that Jesus did in his life. Just whatever you think of when you think of Him. Okay. Now ask yourself this question, can you be precisely what He is and nothing else, without doing the same things that He did? And seriously think about it, the first question you can answer quickly, this one is a deeper question.
To me the answer to the second question, is a clear no. You must in fact do what He did in order to be precisely what He is. Just as He did only what He saw His Father do, we must do the same.
So then that leaves me back to the first question, what did Jesus do? If I must do precisely what Jesus did in order be saved, that list has on it a couple of items that are far more difficult than converse face to face with God in this lifetime. This is what I meant by far more expansive view.

Jesus sacrificed Himself to save an entire creation. I believe that:
It is in vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are heirs with those, or can be heirs with them, who have offered their all in sacrifice, and by this means obtained faith in God and favor with him so as to obtain eternal life, unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice, and through that offering obtain the knowledge that they are accepted of him.
To me this indicates that I too must offer the same sacrifice that Jesus did in order to be saved as He is saved. And people in this thread are discussing something comparatively much simpler: do we need to see God and commune with Him face to face in this life? It seems trivial compared to the fuller claims being made. Kind of like when Christians accuse Mormons of being polytheistic because we believe Jesus and Heavenly Father are separate beings. Really?! Just wait til you hear about Heavenly Mother and the likelihood that Heavenly Father also has a Father...

So now I turn things back over to you. And yes, there are obvious follow up questions. If you or anyone else is interested in those topics, please ask the questions. Otherwise I will just retreat back to lurking.
Can I be precisely what He is and nothing else without doing the same things that He did?

I cannot be precisely what He is, period, no one can, those who say they can are not being honest. I can only try to do what He did to the best of MY ability and I can only offer my life if He wishes to allow it to be taken from me. There is a Heavenly Mother, obviously, and of course Heavenly Father also has a Father, ad infinitum.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 7:43 am
by jdt
Craig Johnson wrote: March 25th, 2018, 6:20 pm Can I be precisely what He is and nothing else without doing the same things that He did?

I cannot be precisely what He is, period, no one can, those who say they can are not being honest. I can only try to do what He did to the best of MY ability and I can only offer my life if He wishes to allow it to be taken from me. There is a Heavenly Mother, obviously, and of course Heavenly Father also has a Father, ad infinitum.
Is Jesus precisely what His Father is? He claimed to only do the things He saw His Father do. Was this a true statement (both accurately recorded and correct)? If so, are we not trying to be like Jesus? Even if we do fall woefully short at this point, do we not hold out the hope that we can one day be like He is? And if we are never to be like Jesus, could we ever be trusted to be in a position like the one He has? Or in other words, if we don't live the same law He lives, can we live in the same kingdom that He lives in?

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 8:57 am
by Onsdag
“Great blessings await us at this time, and will soon be poured out upon us, if we are faithful in all things, for we are even entitled to greater spiritual blessings than they were, because they had Christ in person with them, to instruct them in the great plan of salvation. His personal presence we have not, therefore we have need of greater faith.” - Joseph Smith (TPJS, 90)

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 9:33 am
by Craig Johnson
jdt wrote: March 26th, 2018, 7:43 am
Craig Johnson wrote: March 25th, 2018, 6:20 pm Can I be precisely what He is and nothing else without doing the same things that He did?

I cannot be precisely what He is, period, no one can, those who say they can are not being honest. I can only try to do what He did to the best of MY ability and I can only offer my life if He wishes to allow it to be taken from me. There is a Heavenly Mother, obviously, and of course Heavenly Father also has a Father, ad infinitum.
Is Jesus precisely what His Father is? He claimed to only do the things He saw His Father do. Was this a true statement (both accurately recorded and correct)? If so, are we not trying to be like Jesus? Even if we do fall woefully short at this point, do we not hold out the hope that we can one day be like He is? And if we are never to be like Jesus, could we ever be trusted to be in a position like the one He has? Or in other words, if we don't live the same law He lives, can we live in the same kingdom that He lives in?
I am guessing that you don't actually know the answer to these questions or maybe confused on some of the details?
1. He is not His Father, see Luke 9:26, He cannot come in His own glory if He is the Father. He is a mirror image of His Father, He is exactly like Him but He is not Him. They are two separate persons. Due to divine investiture of authority the Lord often speaks as though He is His Father because they are One in purpose, this is a concept that can only be understood at the simplest of levels by people with mortal minds. Since you are not asking how the Lord is our Father I will not address that. To say that He is precisely what His Father is may indicate that you think He is His Father, which is not true, if you mean to indicate that He is exactly like His Father, but is a separate person, you would be correct. The wording of the question is slightly problematic and could be made more clear by saying it this way, "Is He precisely like His Father?" Is He precisely what His Father is? No, they occupy two separate bodies and have their own spirits..
2. Yes. This statement has dual meanings. Spiritually He did that which His Father showed Him, temporally He did that which He saw His mortal father do, who was a righteous man. Keep in mind that He grew from grace to grace unlike any of us, He did no backsliding, He did no sin regardless of what Hollywood puts out, i.e. if He saw Joseph or anyone else do anything wrong He did not do that, but He did learn from it. Also, remember that this very special person only had to learn things once, we are not like that.
3. Some of us are trying to be like the Lord and this is because we love Him who loved us first and laid His life down for us.
4. Yes and we fail everyday, but we can keep trying.
5. To be like the Lord will be positionally relevant, but that does not mean you will come back to mortality and live the life He lived. If you are never to be like Him you will not be in a position like the one He is in, i.e. you will not be given all that the Father has.
6. If you do not live His law you will not dwell in the kingdom where He dwells, but you might dwell in a lesser kingdom that He controls and visits.
I hope these answers help you to understand better. These questions demonstrate that you are thinking deeply about the Lord. God bless.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 10:26 am
by jdt
Craig Johnson wrote: March 26th, 2018, 9:33 am I am guessing that you don't actually know the answer to these questions or maybe confused on some of the details?
1. He is not His Father, see Luke 9:26, He cannot come in His own glory if He is the Father. He is a mirror image of His Father, He is exactly like Him but He is not Him. They are two separate persons. Due to divine investiture of authority the Lord often speaks as though He is His Father because they are One in purpose, this is a concept that can only be understood at the simplest of levels by people with mortal minds. Since you are not asking how the Lord is our Father I will not address that. To say that He is precisely what His Father is may indicate that you think He is His Father, which is not true, if you mean to indicate that He is exactly like His Father, but is a separate person, you would be correct. The wording of the question is slightly problematic and could be made more clear by saying it this way, "Is He precisely like His Father?" Is He precisely what His Father is? No, they occupy two separate bodies and have their own spirits..
2. Yes. This statement has dual meanings. Spiritually He did that which His Father showed Him, temporally He did that which He saw His mortal father do, who was a righteous man. Keep in mind that He grew from grace to grace unlike any of us, He did no backsliding, He did no sin regardless of what Hollywood puts out, i.e. if He saw Joseph or anyone else do anything wrong He did not do that, but He did learn from it. Also, remember that this very special person only had to learn things once, we are not like that.
3. Some of us are trying to be like the Lord and this is because we love Him who loved us first and laid His life down for us.
4. Yes and we fail everyday, but we can keep trying.
5. To be like the Lord will be positionally relevant, but that does not mean you will come back to mortality and live the life He lived. If you are never to be like Him you will not be in a position like the one He is in, i.e. you will not be given all that the Father has.
6. If you do not live His law you will not dwell in the kingdom where He dwells, but you might dwell in a lesser kingdom that He controls and visits.
I hope these answers help you to understand better. These questions demonstrate that you are thinking deeply about the Lord. God bless.
I have my understanding of the things. It may be right, it may not be. I do the best I can.
Per #1 - I did not intend to conflate the Heavenly Father and Jesus as being the same person. I merely used the language of the Lectures on Faith.
In the 5th lecture, which I believe is correct, it is very plain that the two are not one:
There are two personages who constitute the great matchless, governing and supreme power over all things- by whom all things were created and made, that are created and made, whether visible or invisible: whether in heaven, on earth, or in the earth, under the earth, or throughout the immensity of space- They are the Father and the Son...
Later in the 7th lecture:
We ask, then, Where is the prototype? or Where is the saved being? We conclude as to the answer of this question there will be no dispute among those who believe the bible, that it is Christ: all will agree in this that he is the prototype or standard of salvation, or in other words, that he is a saved being. And if we should continue our interrogation, and ask how it is that he is saved, the answer would be, because he is a just and holy being; and if he were anything different from what he is he would not be saved; for his salvation depends on his being precisely what he is and nothing else; for if it were possible for him to change in the least degree, so sure he would fail of salvation and lose all his dominion, power, authority and glory, which constitutes salvation; for salvation consists in the glory, authority, majesty, power and dominion which Jehovah possesses, and in nothing else; and no being can possess it but himself or one like him...
I did not include the whole thing before, but this expanded version clearly shows you can be like Him (though it seems to indicate being precisely like Him, not kind of like Him in some ways).
2. I offer this quote from the King Follett Discourse for your consideration:
These are the first principles of consolation. How consoling to the mourners when they are called to part with a husband, wife, father, mother, child, or dear relative, to know that, although the earthly tabernacle is laid down and dissolved, they shall rise again to dwell in everlasting burnings in immortal glory, not to sorrow, suffer, or die any more, but they shall be heirs of God and joint heirs with Jesus Christ. What is it? To inherit the same power, the same glory and the same exaltation, until you arrive at the station of a god, and ascend the throne of eternal power, the same as those who have gone before. What did Jesus do? Why, I do the things I saw my Father do when worlds came rolling into existence. My Father worked out His kingdom with fear and trembling, and I must do the same; and when I get my kingdom, I shall present it to My Father, so that He may obtain kingdom upon kingdom, and it will exalt Him in glory. He will then take a higher exaltation, and I will take His place, and thereby become exalted myself. So that Jesus treads in the tracks of His Father, and inherits what God did before; and God is thus glorified and exalted in the salvation and exaltation of all His children. It is plain beyond disputation, and you thus learn some of the first principles of the gospel, about which so much hath been said.
And also:
What did Jesus say? (Mark it, Elder Rigdon!) The scriptures inform us that Jesus said, as the Father hath power in himself, even so hath the Son power—to do what? Why, what the Father did. The answer is obvious—in a manner to lay down his body and take it up again. Jesus, what are you going to do? To lay down my life as my Father did, and take it up again. Do you believe it? If you do not believe it you do not believe the Bible. The scriptures say it, and I defy all the learning and wisdom and all the combined powers of earth and hell together to refute it. Here, then, is eternal life—to know the only wise and true God; and you have got to learn how to be gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all gods have done before you, namely, by going from one small degree to another, and from a small capacity to a great one; from grace to grace, from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those who sit enthroned in everlasting power.
I understand this to mean He did the things on earth that He saw Heavenly Father do on some world prior to this world. I also submit that there seem to be 2 possible interpretations of D&C 93 when it talks about Him growing from grace to grace. 1. He did this growth during his childhood years (or some other time during his mortal lifetime) or 2. this growth was prior to his mortal life here on earth. For my part, I believe the latter.
3 and 4 and 6: I agree.
5: This seems to be the crux of the discussion. Again I claim this statement to be true from the 6th Lecture:
It is in vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are heirs with those, or can be heirs with them, who have offered their all in sacrifice, and by this means obtained faith in God and favor with him so as to obtain eternal life, unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice, and through that offering obtain the knowledge that they are accepted of him.
I claim that Christ meets the definition of offering his all in sacrifice, and that it is vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are or can be heirs with Him unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice. It is not some academic thing you read in a celestial textbook, but literally make the same sacrifice. That is how Heavenly Father worked out his Kingdom and that is the track that all who would be Gods must follow.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 10:43 am
by Craig Johnson
jdt wrote: March 26th, 2018, 10:26 am
Craig Johnson wrote: March 26th, 2018, 9:33 am I am guessing that you don't actually know the answer to these questions or maybe confused on some of the details?
1. He is not His Father, see Luke 9:26, He cannot come in His own glory if He is the Father. He is a mirror image of His Father, He is exactly like Him but He is not Him. They are two separate persons. Due to divine investiture of authority the Lord often speaks as though He is His Father because they are One in purpose, this is a concept that can only be understood at the simplest of levels by people with mortal minds. Since you are not asking how the Lord is our Father I will not address that. To say that He is precisely what His Father is may indicate that you think He is His Father, which is not true, if you mean to indicate that He is exactly like His Father, but is a separate person, you would be correct. The wording of the question is slightly problematic and could be made more clear by saying it this way, "Is He precisely like His Father?" Is He precisely what His Father is? No, they occupy two separate bodies and have their own spirits..
2. Yes. This statement has dual meanings. Spiritually He did that which His Father showed Him, temporally He did that which He saw His mortal father do, who was a righteous man. Keep in mind that He grew from grace to grace unlike any of us, He did no backsliding, He did no sin regardless of what Hollywood puts out, i.e. if He saw Joseph or anyone else do anything wrong He did not do that, but He did learn from it. Also, remember that this very special person only had to learn things once, we are not like that.
3. Some of us are trying to be like the Lord and this is because we love Him who loved us first and laid His life down for us.
4. Yes and we fail everyday, but we can keep trying.
5. To be like the Lord will be positionally relevant, but that does not mean you will come back to mortality and live the life He lived. If you are never to be like Him you will not be in a position like the one He is in, i.e. you will not be given all that the Father has.
6. If you do not live His law you will not dwell in the kingdom where He dwells, but you might dwell in a lesser kingdom that He controls and visits.
I hope these answers help you to understand better. These questions demonstrate that you are thinking deeply about the Lord. God bless.
I have my understanding of the things. It may be right, it may not be. I do the best I can.
Per #1 - I did not intend to conflate the Heavenly Father and Jesus as being the same person. I merely used the language of the Lectures on Faith.
In the 5th lecture, which I believe is correct, it is very plain that the two are not one:
There are two personages who constitute the great matchless, governing and supreme power over all things- by whom all things were created and made, that are created and made, whether visible or invisible: whether in heaven, on earth, or in the earth, under the earth, or throughout the immensity of space- They are the Father and the Son...
Later in the 7th lecture:
We ask, then, Where is the prototype? or Where is the saved being? We conclude as to the answer of this question there will be no dispute among those who believe the bible, that it is Christ: all will agree in this that he is the prototype or standard of salvation, or in other words, that he is a saved being. And if we should continue our interrogation, and ask how it is that he is saved, the answer would be, because he is a just and holy being; and if he were anything different from what he is he would not be saved; for his salvation depends on his being precisely what he is and nothing else; for if it were possible for him to change in the least degree, so sure he would fail of salvation and lose all his dominion, power, authority and glory, which constitutes salvation; for salvation consists in the glory, authority, majesty, power and dominion which Jehovah possesses, and in nothing else; and no being can possess it but himself or one like him...
I did not include the whole thing before, but this expanded version clearly shows you can be like Him (though it seems to indicate being precisely like Him, not kind of like Him in some ways).
2. I offer this quote from the King Follett Discourse for your consideration:
These are the first principles of consolation. How consoling to the mourners when they are called to part with a husband, wife, father, mother, child, or dear relative, to know that, although the earthly tabernacle is laid down and dissolved, they shall rise again to dwell in everlasting burnings in immortal glory, not to sorrow, suffer, or die any more, but they shall be heirs of God and joint heirs with Jesus Christ. What is it? To inherit the same power, the same glory and the same exaltation, until you arrive at the station of a god, and ascend the throne of eternal power, the same as those who have gone before. What did Jesus do? Why, I do the things I saw my Father do when worlds came rolling into existence. My Father worked out His kingdom with fear and trembling, and I must do the same; and when I get my kingdom, I shall present it to My Father, so that He may obtain kingdom upon kingdom, and it will exalt Him in glory. He will then take a higher exaltation, and I will take His place, and thereby become exalted myself. So that Jesus treads in the tracks of His Father, and inherits what God did before; and God is thus glorified and exalted in the salvation and exaltation of all His children. It is plain beyond disputation, and you thus learn some of the first principles of the gospel, about which so much hath been said.
And also:
What did Jesus say? (Mark it, Elder Rigdon!) The scriptures inform us that Jesus said, as the Father hath power in himself, even so hath the Son power—to do what? Why, what the Father did. The answer is obvious—in a manner to lay down his body and take it up again. Jesus, what are you going to do? To lay down my life as my Father did, and take it up again. Do you believe it? If you do not believe it you do not believe the Bible. The scriptures say it, and I defy all the learning and wisdom and all the combined powers of earth and hell together to refute it. Here, then, is eternal life—to know the only wise and true God; and you have got to learn how to be gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all gods have done before you, namely, by going from one small degree to another, and from a small capacity to a great one; from grace to grace, from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those who sit enthroned in everlasting power.
I understand this to mean He did the things on earth that He saw Heavenly Father do on some world prior to this world. I also submit that there seem to be 2 possible interpretations of D&C 93 when it talks about Him growing from grace to grace. 1. He did this growth during his childhood years (or some other time during his mortal lifetime) or 2. this growth was prior to his mortal life here on earth. For my part, I believe the latter.
3 and 4 and 6: I agree.
5: This seems to be the crux of the discussion. Again I claim this statement to be true from the 6th Lecture:
It is in vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are heirs with those, or can be heirs with them, who have offered their all in sacrifice, and by this means obtained faith in God and favor with him so as to obtain eternal life, unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice, and through that offering obtain the knowledge that they are accepted of him.
I claim that Christ meets the definition of offering his all in sacrifice, and that it is vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are or can be heirs with Him unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice. It is not some academic thing you read in a celestial textbook, but literally make the same sacrifice. That is how Heavenly Father worked out his Kingdom and that is the track that all who would be Gods must follow.
So, when you go to get baptized invite me to be a witness.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 11:56 am
by LatterDayLizard
The works that Jesus did were to be baptized, serve, teach, forgive, heal, love, and obey God. It's a beautiful, simple truth every primary child understands. There's no need to make it more complicated than that.

I've noticed one of Satan's strategies is to complicate the simple truths of the gospel so that the proud are flattered into thinking they are meeting some impossible, elite standard while the humble who are not prone to flattery will instead sink into despair and give up trying; either way, a win/win for Satan.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 12:01 pm
by Baurak Ale
jdt wrote: March 26th, 2018, 10:26 am This seems to be the crux of the discussion. Again I claim this statement to be true from the 6th Lecture:
It is in vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are heirs with those, or can be heirs with them, who have offered their all in sacrifice, and by this means obtained faith in God and favor with him so as to obtain eternal life, unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice, and through that offering obtain the knowledge that they are accepted of him.
I claim that Christ meets the definition of offering his all in sacrifice, and that it is vain for persons to fancy to themselves that they are or can be heirs with Him unless they in like manner offer unto him the same sacrifice. It is not some academic thing you read in a celestial textbook, but literally make the same sacrifice. That is how Heavenly Father worked out his Kingdom and that is the track that all who would be Gods must follow.
And what is that sacrifice? Verse five of that same sixth section from which you quoted verse eight gives the proper pronoun antecedent:
"[It is] for a man to lay down his all, his character and reputation, his honor and applause, his good name among men, his houses, his lands, his brothers and sisters, his wife and children, and even his own life also, counting all things but filth and dross for the excellency of the knowledge of Jesus Christ...realizing, that when these sufferings are ended he will enter into eternal rest; and be a partaker of the glory of God."
This is the same principle in effect as that which is laid out in the Doctrine and Covenants 25:10:
And verily I say unto thee that thou shalt lay aside the things of this world, and seek for the things of a better.
Now, I will reveal to you how to do this (if you assume that the Celestial Kingdom constitutes a 'better' world):
They are they who received the testimony of Jesus, and believed on his name and were baptized after the manner of his burial, being buried in the water in his name, and this according to the commandment which he has given—that by keeping the commandments they might be washed and cleansed from all their sins, and receive the Holy Spirit by the laying on of the hands of him who is ordained and sealed unto this power; and who overcome by faith, and are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, which the Father sheds forth upon all those who are just and true. (D&C 76:51-53).
That's it, folks! ALL the ordinances of the Aaronic and Melchizedek priesthoods are included therein for those with eyes to see. Therefore, to sacrifice all things, as the Son and the Father have done, is to set aside all else in pursuit of the commandments and ordinances set by the head (Christ, in our case; the Father, in Christ's). So also it is said in the Book of Mormon (for modern revelation deniers), as Nephi taught:
"The gate by which ye should enter is repentance and baptism by water; and then cometh a remission of your sins by fire and by the Holy Ghost. And now, my beloved brethren, after ye have gotten into this strait and narrow path, I would ask if all is done? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for ye have not come thus far save it were by the word of Christ with unshaken faith in him, relying wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save. Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life. [...] Wherefore, now after I have spoken these words, if ye cannot understand them it will be because ye ask not, neither do ye knock; wherefore, ye are not brought into the light, but must perish in the dark. For behold, again I say unto you that if ye will enter in by the way, and receive the Holy Ghost, it will show unto you all things what ye should do. Behold, this is the doctrine of Christ, and there will be no more doctrine given until after he shall manifest himself unto you in the flesh. And when he shall manifest himself unto you in the flesh, the things which he shall say unto you shall ye observe to do" (2 Nephi 31:17,19-20; 32:4-6).

(Note how that the doctrine that leads to eternal life is given in full though Christ could deliver additional to the person whose calling and election has been made sure after that fact, as Joseph Smith said, it is the privilege of those whose callings and elections have been made sure to receive the second comforter--not the other way around [see STPJS 150]).

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 26th, 2018, 12:14 pm
by Arenera
The reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.

We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.

Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would make it. The remnant doctrine is false.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 27th, 2018, 7:45 am
by jdt
Arenera wrote: March 26th, 2018, 12:14 pm The reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.

We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.

Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would make it. The remnant doctrine is false.
I don't think our beliefs are that different. Might I slightly reword your post to one that I could completely agree with:
In the telestial world we now live in, the reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.
We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.
Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would progress. Individuals came here at different levels of growth, but many will develop to be more like God.

Could you agree with that statement?

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 27th, 2018, 7:49 am
by Arenera
jdt wrote: March 27th, 2018, 7:45 am
Arenera wrote: March 26th, 2018, 12:14 pm The reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.

We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.

Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would make it. The remnant doctrine is false.
I don't think our beliefs are that different. Might I slightly reword your post to one that I could completely agree with:
In the telestial world we now live in, the reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.
We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.
Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would progress. Individuals came here at different levels of growth, but many will develop to be more like God.

Could you agree with that statement?
Jesus received God's Grace as a Spirit Son.

I agree with many will develop.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 27th, 2018, 8:15 am
by jdt
Arenera wrote: March 27th, 2018, 7:49 am
jdt wrote: March 27th, 2018, 7:45 am
Arenera wrote: March 26th, 2018, 12:14 pm The reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.

We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.

Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would make it. The remnant doctrine is false.
I don't think our beliefs are that different. Might I slightly reword your post to one that I could completely agree with:
In the telestial world we now live in, the reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.
We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.
Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would progress. Individuals came here at different levels of growth, but many will develop to be more like God.

Could you agree with that statement?
Jesus received God's Grace as a Spirit Son.

I agree with many will develop.
And ultimately developing is receiving more grace from God until we receive a fullness, like Jesus.

Some come here with less, some come with more. Some come with little to be recognized for, they can then grow in integrity when no one is looking. Some come with great power and authority, they can grow by learning to not use unrighteous dominion. Some come into life without an opportunity to learn the gospel and despite that still show great charity. Some come into an ideal situation, but still must choose the light over the darkness. But we all fall short and need a Redeemer. There will be those who inherit the Celestial Kingdom who do not accept Baptism in this life (much less receive the Second Comforter). But that does not mean that we don't preach Baptism (or receiving our Lord)?

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 27th, 2018, 8:52 am
by Arenera
jdt wrote: March 27th, 2018, 8:15 am
Arenera wrote: March 27th, 2018, 7:49 am
jdt wrote: March 27th, 2018, 7:45 am
Arenera wrote: March 26th, 2018, 12:14 pm The reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.

We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.

Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would make it. The remnant doctrine is false.
I don't think our beliefs are that different. Might I slightly reword your post to one that I could completely agree with:
In the telestial world we now live in, the reason Jesus is Christ is because Father gave him is glory to start with. Jesus was chosen to do the work He did.
We can’t be like Jesus because we don’t have Father’s glory. We can accept Jesus as our Savior. We do our best to emulate His behavior.
Father didn’t create this world so a handful of people would progress. Individuals came here at different levels of growth, but many will develop to be more like God.

Could you agree with that statement?
Jesus received God's Grace as a Spirit Son.

I agree with many will develop.
And ultimately developing is receiving more grace from God until we receive a fullness, like Jesus.

Some come here with less, some come with more. Some come with little to be recognized for, they can then grow in integrity when no one is looking. Some come with great power and authority, they can grow by learning to not use unrighteous dominion. Some come into life without an opportunity to learn the gospel and despite that still show great charity. Some come into an ideal situation, but still must choose the light over the darkness. But we all fall short and need a Redeemer. There will be those who inherit the Celestial Kingdom who do not accept Baptism in this life (much less receive the Second Comforter). But that does not mean that we don't preach Baptism (or receiving our Lord)?
Yes, we need to preach the Gospel, which includes:
4 We believe that the first principles and ordinances of the Gospel are: first, Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ; second, Repentance; third, Baptism by immersion for the remission of sins; fourth, Laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost.
and
5 We believe that a man must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands by those who are in authority, to preach the Gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof.
and
6 We believe in the same organization that existed in the Primitive Church, namely, apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, evangelists, and so forth.

Re: Mormon remnant doctrine

Posted: March 27th, 2018, 10:46 am
by Finrock
BTH&T wrote: March 24th, 2018, 10:53 am
Arenera wrote: March 23rd, 2018, 8:25 am See 2nd Nephi 33.

7 I have charity for my people, and great faith in Christ that I shall meet many souls spotless at his judgment-seat.

12 And I pray the Father in the name of Christ that many of us, if not all, may be saved in his kingdom at that great and last day.

15 For what I seal on earth, shall be brought against you at the judgment bar; for thus hath the Lord commanded me, and I must obey. Amen.
Another thread, same misconception.
The scripture quoted was a prayer for what is a desire for all to return, not a proclamation of the Lords Plan.

We will not be saved in our sins.
I don't think that you are taking in to account that Nephi had the sealing power and that what he bound on earth would be bound in heaven. This was the prayer of a sealer, a prophet, a seer, and a revelator.

-Finrock