What? Important Climate Update!

[rewcox]

So your homeboy Glenn just said he'd be down with a Hillary presidency:

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politic ... 50342.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Glenn Beck, one of the most famous conservative pundits in the nation, said in 2007 of a Hillary Clinton presidency: “After four years, don't you think every man in America will go insane?”

Nine years later, Beck might not have embraced the idea, but he’s prepared to accept it. An outspoken critic of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump since the primaries, Beck posted to Facebook on Saturday, calling on his fellow conservatives to drop their support of Trump, even if it means handing the White House to Clinton. He said doing so would be “a moral, ethical choice.”

Queue calls for Beck's head in 3......2......1......

I listen to Beck every morning on my commute. I don't agree with him on this one thing but I still listen to him and I respect the fact that he is entitled to his own opinion just like I respect the fact that you and Rewcox are entitled to your own opinions.

One of the things that I am most grateful to the lord for is that through free agency he allowed us a diversity of thought and opinion. Imagine how boring the world would be if Lucifer had his way.

Nice to know the whole thing is in the Lord's hands too, aint it?

Even with the hatred that some here and other radical republicans express for Hillary, I believe that the majority of America will reject Trump and what he represents against the principles of democracy and human decency.

[markharr]

Even with the hatred that some here and other radical republicans express for Hillary, I believe that the majority of America will reject Trump and what he represents against the principles of democracy and human decency.

You just had to ruin the nonpartisanship didn't you? ;)

Would you care to cite an example of this "hate"? Pointing our crimes, fraud and corruption is not hate, and......

If it is hate, you are just as hateful of Trump.

[rewcox]

Even with the hatred that some here and other radical republicans express for Hillary, I believe that the majority of America will reject Trump and what he represents against the principles of democracy and human decency.

You just had to ruin the nonpartisanship didn't you? ;)

Would you care to cite an example of this "hate"? Pointing our crimes, fraud and corruption is not hate.

Mexicans are rapists. Mrs Kahn can't say anything. I'm rich so I can do whatever I want.

Do you even listen to what comes out of Trump's mouth?

[markharr]

Even with the hatred that some here and other radical republicans express for Hillary, I believe that the majority of America will reject Trump and what he represents against the principles of democracy and human decency.

You just had to ruin the nonpartisanship didn't you? ;)

Would you care to cite an example of this "hate"? Pointing our crimes, fraud and corruption is not hate.

Mexicans are rapists. Mrs Kahn can't say anything. I'm rich so I can do whatever I want.

Do you even listen to what comes out of Trump's mouth?

That is not what you said.

Even with the hatred that some here and other radical republicans express for Hillary

Would you like to try again?

[rewcox]

Even with the hatred that some here and other radical republicans express for Hillary, I believe that the majority of America will reject Trump and what he represents against the principles of democracy and human decency.

You just had to ruin the nonpartisanship didn't you? ;)

Would you care to cite an example of this "hate"? Pointing our crimes, fraud and corruption is not hate.

Mexicans are rapists. Mrs Kahn can't say anything. I'm rich so I can do whatever I want.

Do you even listen to what comes out of Trump's mouth?

That is not what you said.

Even with the hatred that some here and other radical republicans express for Hillary

Would you like to try again?

It is hate because you can't even see clearly.

How can Trump work with Congress? By calling people names? He is used to bullying his way around.

Why do you support him? Probably because you don't like the democrat platform. I'm amazed at those who have turned a blind eye on Trump, because of the hatred over Hillary.

You've turned your backs on minorities and the less fortunate. Well, payback time is tough.

It should have been easy to defeat Hillary. Unless you are an arrogant jerk and want to just focus on yourself. That is Trump, and what a disgrace to America and the Republican Party.

[ajax]

What is it that males and educated journalists do not “get” about the Locker Room Code of Conduct with its purpose of protecting each other as well as the culture?
http://www.targetliberty.com/2016/10/wh ... .html#more" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

By Linda Schrock Taylor

If it mattered what was said in locker rooms, then I would be offended, but it does not matter. This craziness needs to stop and honorable reporting of the real news, at this most important time in America’s possibly diminishing lifespan, needs to become the order of the day.
Believe me, if anyone has cause to complain about bad language, that person is I. I taught for over forty years and during those decades, I had words of every length, meaning, reference, and suggestion, spit directly into my face, an inch from my nose, with threats that a fist would follow them. Those words were shouted by innumerable frustrated teen boys who were unforgivably failed by our public school system. Those boys had trusted that their teachers would teach them to read but instead, the boys had arrived in my classroom as illiterate, volatile, failing 10th graders. If I could choose to be semi-deaf when that undeserved abuse was dumped on me, you all can choose to be semi-deaf when words, spoken eleven years ago and never meant to be heard by you, are now made known because a spy with a tape recorder chose to betray his fellow males.

My first step toward taming mouthy boys was
–sending them to the locker room! That is right. Our males need a safe place, not only to blow off steam, but to brag, bluster, and display bravado, as males of all species on Earth do. Our males need locker rooms where they can speak freely without fear of recriminations, so I taught my boys to go there instead of speaking offensively in my classroom, the hallways, or around society. I taught them how to differentiate between various levels of English: Standard English;Queen’s English; Home English; Schoolyard English; Locker Room English; Dialect English. I taught that dialects are appropriate—at proper times; in proper places; but use at school while learning how to read, write, and the spell is neither the place nor the timing for speaking with dialects. We discussed Family English and I explained that my deaf brother could never say “whipped cream.” My family has continued to use Reed’s pronunciation since his death in 1973, but that we never ask for “creama whippa” when shopping. Most importantly, my students were told that I was never to hear Locker Room English spoken outside of the Locker Room. I am proud to report that those boys, now grown men, continue to show great respect, never using locker room language within my hearing.

No, it has been the supposedly educated reporters, journalists, and talk show hosts of FoxNews, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, The Daily Mail, and other media sources who decided to again assault my senses and defile my world.

Plus decades of Bill Clinton. I will never forget the morning that our local CBS affiliate broadcast decadence to hundreds of preschool and school-age children across Cadillac and northwest Lower Michigan. I have often wondered if those reporters even considered what might happen after they publically described Bill Clinton’s trashy lifestyle during the breakfast hour. My four year old turned to me and asked, “Mom, what is oral sex, anyway?” Yes, Willy spoke and acted outside the walls of the locker room, just like the animals onAnimal Planet and NatGeo do, thus exposing previously guarded areas of life to sheltered, innocent children. Still, there were enough stupid and/or trained-seal Democrats to vote him a second term. The thought that there may be enough non-thinking and trained voters to elect his nasty, dishonest wife, as well, thoroughly chills the blood.

We need locker rooms and private spaces where people can speak freely and occasionally even talk too much. Women do, as well, and should admit it instead of pretending to be oh, so shocked by that tape recording. We do not meet in locker rooms. We have eventswhere we discuss men and the shadier sides of life: bridal showers; home decorating parties; Tupperware parties. In Chile, such gatherings are referred to as “LuLu Parties,” named after the old cartoon character, Little LuLu. One evening, just as our party was starting, a man knocked. The women rushed the door and for a moment I feared the ladies would tear the fellow apart for daring to show up at a LuLu Party! He had merely stopped to ask his wife a question! Here in America, women rent male strippers, bow ties and all, for some events (but not much else comes with the “all”, don’t cha know). Yes, we must not act holier than the men.

We all must stop this silly finger pointing and theatrical, insincere gasps of false offense. We have a wonderful country to save and the days we have left in which to save it are quickly becoming fewer. The villain here is not Donald Trump. The villains are 1) Sneaky Sleeze, the male who took a tape player into a locker room to betray fellow males, and 2) Hilary Clinton, with her evil plans for America, her possible hiding of dangerous health issues, her probable acceptance of foreign monies for State Department favors, her destruction of public property, her refusal to comply with subpoenas, her willingness to protect her sexual predator husband, and the list continues. It is those two who should be publically humiliated and drummed out of the system, not a hard working, committed presidential candidate who loves America.

Donald Trump had every reason to believe that he was in a time-honored environment protected by a time-honored Code of Ethics. He had every reason to believe that he could safely relax and stretch some tales, rambling on as males have done in locker rooms and men’s club all across this land for centuries. Donald’s ramblings were eleven, meaningless, long ago years ago. They would not even have been noticed; they would have been completely forgotten except for that treacherous, evil spy who plotted to damage a fellow male. Despicable.

What is it that males and educated journalists do not “get” about the Locker Room Code of Conduct with its purpose of protecting each other as well as the culture? Are your characters only lightly spray painted on with water soluble ink?

We all realize that male animals publically strut their stuff without a thought for whom or what is observing or close at hand. Such is Nature’s way. Elephant seals viciously tear at each other with huge tusks, squashing baby seals as they shove each other around the beach. Bull elephants flap their huge ears as they charge any interloper after tearing up a tree or two. Big horn sheep but heads and rudely kick each other in the privates. Dogs kick dirt and piddle on tires, fence posts, and tree trunks. Deer shake big racks before poking each other in attempts to draw blood. It is a male thing, across every land, around the entire world.

Luckily for women, human males, other than for the occasional street brawl and declared war, usually carry out their bravado in the privacy of forests, barns, and locker rooms, away from the sight and hearing of women and children. That was, of course, until civic-minded (not!) reporters like Geraldo felt that they just owed it to the culture to trash it by broadcasting eleven year ago locker room exaggerations so that women could hear what men say in private. (Shall we show our appreciation by turning off our televisions for a week or more?) One British news agency could not wait to report what Trump had said about his daughter, to which my reaction was, “Good for you, Donald! It is nice to know a man who allows his daughters to become women.” Too many a daughter stays trapped as “Daddy’s Little Girl”.

Thank you, Geraldo. Thank you, talk show hosts. Thank you, devious RINOs.

I am being facetious, of course, because no female wants to hear locker room language and have her children exposed to it. Everyone working in media is aware of that. Why else did they try so hard to explain and justify why they just had to break that Code of Conduct and betray another male? They knew they would hurt people in the process but could not resist working the story for effect while pretending to be so High and Mighty. Truthfully, you betrayers look so much shorter, and sound so much dumber, now that we have seen you wearing your true colors, displaying your actual characters.

By the way, what are you planning for your follow-up low? Dirt kicking, antler rattling, or will you stoop to piddle on tires?

-----------------------
Linda Schrock Taylor is a reading specialist, writer, and retired teacher. She is the author of Read Better! For Adults and Teens, a manual for those wanting to read better with greater ease and more efficiency. The book includes short important lessons for use of the code in which English is written, followed by 80 practice stories arranged incrementally, ranging in difficulty from mid-elementary through college levels, with graded scoring for charting progress. Linda is now writing Spell Better, her second in a series for teens and adults. Visit Linda’s website to see lesson samples: http://www.ReadWriteSpellBetter.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

The above orignally appeared at LewRockwell.com

[rewcox]

What is it that males and educated journalists do not “get” about the Locker Room Code of Conduct with its purpose of protecting each other as well as the culture?
http://www.targetliberty.com/2016/10/wh ... .html#more" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

By Linda Schrock Taylor

If it mattered what was said in locker rooms, then I would be offended, but it does not matter. This craziness needs to stop and honorable reporting of the real news, at this most important time in America’s possibly diminishing lifespan, needs to become the order of the day.
Believe me, if anyone has cause to complain about bad language, that person is I. I taught for over forty years and during those decades, I had words of every length, meaning, reference, and suggestion, spit directly into my face, an inch from my nose, with threats that a fist would follow them. Those words were shouted by innumerable frustrated teen boys who were unforgivably failed by our public school system. Those boys had trusted that their teachers would teach them to read but instead, the boys had arrived in my classroom as illiterate, volatile, failing 10th graders. If I could choose to be semi-deaf when that undeserved abuse was dumped on me, you all can choose to be semi-deaf when words, spoken eleven years ago and never meant to be heard by you, are now made known because a spy with a tape recorder chose to betray his fellow males.

My first step toward taming mouthy boys was
–sending them to the locker room! That is right. Our males need a safe place, not only to blow off steam, but to brag, bluster, and display bravado, as males of all species on Earth do. Our males need locker rooms where they can speak freely without fear of recriminations, so I taught my boys to go there instead of speaking offensively in my classroom, the hallways, or around society. I taught them how to differentiate between various levels of English: Standard English;Queen’s English; Home English; Schoolyard English; Locker Room English; Dialect English. I taught that dialects are appropriate—at proper times; in proper places; but use at school while learning how to read, write, and the spell is neither the place nor the timing for speaking with dialects. We discussed Family English and I explained that my deaf brother could never say “whipped cream.” My family has continued to use Reed’s pronunciation since his death in 1973, but that we never ask for “creama whippa” when shopping. Most importantly, my students were told that I was never to hear Locker Room English spoken outside of the Locker Room. I am proud to report that those boys, now grown men, continue to show great respect, never using locker room language within my hearing.

No, it has been the supposedly educated reporters, journalists, and talk show hosts of FoxNews, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, The Daily Mail, and other media sources who decided to again assault my senses and defile my world.

Plus decades of Bill Clinton. I will never forget the morning that our local CBS affiliate broadcast decadence to hundreds of preschool and school-age children across Cadillac and northwest Lower Michigan. I have often wondered if those reporters even considered what might happen after they publically described Bill Clinton’s trashy lifestyle during the breakfast hour. My four year old turned to me and asked, “Mom, what is oral sex, anyway?” Yes, Willy spoke and acted outside the walls of the locker room, just like the animals onAnimal Planet and NatGeo do, thus exposing previously guarded areas of life to sheltered, innocent children. Still, there were enough stupid and/or trained-seal Democrats to vote him a second term. The thought that there may be enough non-thinking and trained voters to elect his nasty, dishonest wife, as well, thoroughly chills the blood.

We need locker rooms and private spaces where people can speak freely and occasionally even talk too much. Women do, as well, and should admit it instead of pretending to be oh, so shocked by that tape recording. We do not meet in locker rooms. We have eventswhere we discuss men and the shadier sides of life: bridal showers; home decorating parties; Tupperware parties. In Chile, such gatherings are referred to as “LuLu Parties,” named after the old cartoon character, Little LuLu. One evening, just as our party was starting, a man knocked. The women rushed the door and for a moment I feared the ladies would tear the fellow apart for daring to show up at a LuLu Party! He had merely stopped to ask his wife a question! Here in America, women rent male strippers, bow ties and all, for some events (but not much else comes with the “all”, don’t cha know). Yes, we must not act holier than the men.

We all must stop this silly finger pointing and theatrical, insincere gasps of false offense. We have a wonderful country to save and the days we have left in which to save it are quickly becoming fewer. The villain here is not Donald Trump. The villains are 1) Sneaky Sleeze, the male who took a tape player into a locker room to betray fellow males, and 2) Hilary Clinton, with her evil plans for America, her possible hiding of dangerous health issues, her probable acceptance of foreign monies for State Department favors, her destruction of public property, her refusal to comply with subpoenas, her willingness to protect her sexual predator husband, and the list continues. It is those two who should be publically humiliated and drummed out of the system, not a hard working, committed presidential candidate who loves America.

Donald Trump had every reason to believe that he was in a time-honored environment protected by a time-honored Code of Ethics. He had every reason to believe that he could safely relax and stretch some tales, rambling on as males have done in locker rooms and men’s club all across this land for centuries. Donald’s ramblings were eleven, meaningless, long ago years ago. They would not even have been noticed; they would have been completely forgotten except for that treacherous, evil spy who plotted to damage a fellow male. Despicable.

What is it that males and educated journalists do not “get” about the Locker Room Code of Conduct with its purpose of protecting each other as well as the culture? Are your characters only lightly spray painted on with water soluble ink?

We all realize that male animals publically strut their stuff without a thought for whom or what is observing or close at hand. Such is Nature’s way. Elephant seals viciously tear at each other with huge tusks, squashing baby seals as they shove each other around the beach. Bull elephants flap their huge ears as they charge any interloper after tearing up a tree or two. Big horn sheep but heads and rudely kick each other in the privates. Dogs kick dirt and piddle on tires, fence posts, and tree trunks. Deer shake big racks before poking each other in attempts to draw blood. It is a male thing, across every land, around the entire world.

Luckily for women, human males, other than for the occasional street brawl and declared war, usually carry out their bravado in the privacy of forests, barns, and locker rooms, away from the sight and hearing of women and children. That was, of course, until civic-minded (not!) reporters like Geraldo felt that they just owed it to the culture to trash it by broadcasting eleven year ago locker room exaggerations so that women could hear what men say in private. (Shall we show our appreciation by turning off our televisions for a week or more?) One British news agency could not wait to report what Trump had said about his daughter, to which my reaction was, “Good for you, Donald! It is nice to know a man who allows his daughters to become women.” Too many a daughter stays trapped as “Daddy’s Little Girl”.

Thank you, Geraldo. Thank you, talk show hosts. Thank you, devious RINOs.

I am being facetious, of course, because no female wants to hear locker room language and have her children exposed to it. Everyone working in media is aware of that. Why else did they try so hard to explain and justify why they just had to break that Code of Conduct and betray another male? They knew they would hurt people in the process but could not resist working the story for effect while pretending to be so High and Mighty. Truthfully, you betrayers look so much shorter, and sound so much dumber, now that we have seen you wearing your true colors, displaying your actual characters.

By the way, what are you planning for your follow-up low? Dirt kicking, antler rattling, or will you stoop to piddle on tires?

-----------------------
Linda Schrock Taylor is a reading specialist, writer, and retired teacher. She is the author of Read Better! For Adults and Teens, a manual for those wanting to read better with greater ease and more efficiency. The book includes short important lessons for use of the code in which English is written, followed by 80 practice stories arranged incrementally, ranging in difficulty from mid-elementary through college levels, with graded scoring for charting progress. Linda is now writing Spell Better, her second in a series for teens and adults. Visit Linda’s website to see lesson samples: http://www.ReadWriteSpellBetter.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.

The above orignally appeared at LewRockwell.com

I agree, school failed Trump. Trump is now failing America and the Republican Party.

[markharr]

I agree, school failed Trump. Trump is now failing America and the Republican Party.

Rewcox, according to your own definition of what is hate, this is hate.

Why are you so full of hate towards Trump?

[larsenb]

Trumpies are excited, I'm not sure about what. Maybe they thought he had an F in the first debate, so a D- is an approvement. . . .

Rewcox earns an F- in his evaluation of both debates. Who is not surprised?

Actually, Trump knocked Hillary out of the park in last night's debate . . . and we can only hope he'll knock her straight into jail after he's elected.

Let's see, Trump is down 11 points since the first debate. You need to look at how you evaluate.

Here an expose of the poll rewcox is all excited about, located here: Media Polling Fully Exposed – About That NBC/WSJ Clinton +11 Point Poll…. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... ore-123009" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Part of the lead in:

. . . . . You have probably seen the latest example of the media claiming a released presidential poll from NBC and The Wall Street Journal as an example of Hillary Clinton expanding to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the “controversial” leaked tape of Donald Trump.

The claim is complete and utter nonsense. Here’s the proof. . .

. . .

The gist of the article is that all the pollsters quoted work for Hillary superpacs, etc., or are in Hillary's pocket, one way or another..

[rewcox]

Trumpies are excited, I'm not sure about what. Maybe they thought he had an F in the first debate, so a D- is an approvement. . . .

Rewcox earns an F- in his evaluation of both debates. Who is not surprised?

Actually, Trump knocked Hillary out of the park in last night's debate . . . and we can only hope he'll knock her straight into jail after he's elected.

Let's see, Trump is down 11 points since the first debate. You need to look at how you evaluate.

Here an expose of the poll rewcox is all excited about, located here: Media Polling Fully Exposed – About That NBC/WSJ Clinton +11 Point Poll…. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... ore-123009" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Part of the lead in:

. . . . . You have probably seen the latest example of the media claiming a released presidential poll from NBC and The Wall Street Journal as an example of Hillary Clinton expanding to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the “controversial” leaked tape of Donald Trump.

The claim is complete and utter nonsense. Here’s the proof. . .

. . .

The gist of the article is that all the pollsters quoted work for Hillary superpacs, etc., or are in Hillary's pocket, one way or another..

We'll know on Nov 9th. Whether the conspiracies from the ridiculous right are correct, or if you are just mad.

Maybe you like standing over women like Trump did in the debate.

Well, your boy is Rouge now. Looks like he'll start another party. You joining.

[larsenb]

. . . We'll know on Nov 9th. Whether the conspiracies from the ridiculous right are correct, or if you are just mad.

Maybe you like standing over women like Trump did in the debate.

Well, your boy is Rouge now. Looks like he'll start another party. You joining.

Rewcox, spoken like a true Hillary lover, even though it borders on being pure gibberish.

[rewcox]

. . . We'll know on Nov 9th. Whether the conspiracies from the ridiculous right are correct, or if you are just mad.

Maybe you like standing over women like Trump did in the debate.

Well, your boy is Rouge now. Looks like he'll start another party. You joining.

Rewcox, spoken like a true Hillary lover, even though it borders on being pure gibberish.

Actually, Beck said supporting Hillary is both ethical and moral.

Can't say that about Trump can you.

[markharr]

. . . We'll know on Nov 9th. Whether the conspiracies from the ridiculous right are correct, or if you are just mad.

Maybe you like standing over women like Trump did in the debate.

Well, your boy is Rouge now. Looks like he'll start another party. You joining.

Rewcox, spoken like a true Hillary lover, even though it borders on being pure gibberish.

Actually, Beck said supporting Hillary is both ethical and moral.

Can't say that about Trump can you.

I can't say that about Hillary. Beck is entitled to his opinion.

[rewcox]

. . . We'll know on Nov 9th. Whether the conspiracies from the ridiculous right are correct, or if you are just mad.

Maybe you like standing over women like Trump did in the debate.

Well, your boy is Rouge now. Looks like he'll start another party. You joining.

Rewcox, spoken like a true Hillary lover, even though it borders on being pure gibberish.

Actually, Beck said supporting Hillary is both ethical and moral.

Can't say that about Trump can you.

I can't say that about Hillary. Beck is entitled to his opinion.

It isn't only Beck. Many Republicans will not be voting for Trump.

It will be interesting to see how Utah goes.

[markharr]

Rewcox, spoken like a true Hillary lover, even though it borders on being pure gibberish.

Actually, Beck said supporting Hillary is both ethical and moral.

Can't say that about Trump can you.

I can't say that about Hillary. Beck is entitled to his opinion.

It isn't only Beck. Many Republicans will not be voting for Trump.

It will be interesting to see how Utah goes.

You seem to be under the assumption that they will be voting for Hillary.

You may be right, Trump might not win Utah, but it's not because Utahns will be voting for Hillary.

[rewcox]

“… to vote for wicked men, it would be sin,” said Hyrum Smith. (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 323.)

And so four great civic standards for the faithful Saints are, first, the Constitution ordained by God through wise men; second, the scriptures, particularly the Book of Mormon; third, the inspired counsel of the prophets, especially the living president, and fourth, the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

[anonymous91]

rewcox said: "Maybe you like standing over women like Trump did in the debate."

So, I'm just guessing but is the main reason you like Clinton is because she is a woman? If I was a woman, she would be the last woman on earth I would want representing me.

It terrifies me to think that the sole reason some people will vote for Hillary is based entirely on the fact that she is a woman.

Rewcox also said: "Actually, Beck said supporting Hillary is both ethical and moral." Well apparently, there are those that let their brains fall out of their head too.

Let's take a look at what being moral is?

Definition of being moral = "concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character."

Let's also define another term, moral relativism = "is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal moral truths, but instead make claims relative to social, cultural, historical or personal circumstances."

The problem with society is that their moral compass is relative, does this scripture ring a bell, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" Isaiah 5:20

Last definition, ethical, "of or relating to moral principles or the branch of knowledge dealing with these."

So for purposes of this discussion we are going to define morality and ethical as defined by scriptures.

So, are you telling me that you believe that Hillary Clinton is a moral and ethical person?

Before you answer, we should examine reality:

First video, she implies that pro lifers are terrorists. She supports murdering babies (i.e.Planned Parenthood). That sounds moral, right? (sarcasm intended):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiH_G3Ky_NI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Second Video, where she takes no responsibility for her actions (or should I say lack of actions) in the Benghazi Incident.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSooz2wXpes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

For additional info: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/brea ... long-whoa/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Let's see what one of her former bodyguards has to say about her, not very moral or ethical:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZSD2cUjGOE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Now this next one is controversial, but seems to be in character for Hillary. No way all of this is just a coincidence.

The Clinton Body Count List: http://www.govtslaves.info/comprehensiv ... ount-list/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Ousted by her own hitman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfl-Qr73EUg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hillary is a Career Criminal, see here. The Clinton's should have ended up in jail multiple times over. :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kypl1MYuKDY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hillary laughing about a rape victim, and you call her moral and ethical:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tor00iWUhDQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is just the tip of the iceberg with this evil woman. She is getting better and better at hiding who she really is, but to call her moral and ethical you'd have to be brain dead.

It amazes me how this issue keeps coming back around to who's worse, Trump or Hillary.

The issue is much deeper than this, as I and others have said multiple times.

Well if Hillary wins, at least we can look forward to WWIII, and the end of the world as we know it faster, right?

[Fiannan]

“… to vote for wicked men, it would be sin,” said Hyrum Smith. (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 323.)

And so four great civic standards for the faithful Saints are, first, the Constitution ordained by God through wise men; second, the scriptures, particularly the Book of Mormon; third, the inspired counsel of the prophets, especially the living president, and fourth, the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

So it is okay to vote for a wicked woman though?

Second, compare the people Trump has said he would appoint to the courts as opposed to Hillary. Want to kill the Constitution? Hillary will do it.

[rewcox]

“… to vote for wicked men, it would be sin,” said Hyrum Smith. (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 323.)

And so four great civic standards for the faithful Saints are, first, the Constitution ordained by God through wise men; second, the scriptures, particularly the Book of Mormon; third, the inspired counsel of the prophets, especially the living president, and fourth, the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

So it is okay to vote for a wicked woman though?

Second, compare the people Trump has said he would appoint to the courts as opposed to Hillary. Want to kill the Constitution? Hillary will do it.

Too bad your boy couldn't focus on issues instead of hate, name calling, and focos on his own arrogancey.

[Fiannan]

“… to vote for wicked men, it would be sin,” said Hyrum Smith. (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 323.)

And so four great civic standards for the faithful Saints are, first, the Constitution ordained by God through wise men; second, the scriptures, particularly the Book of Mormon; third, the inspired counsel of the prophets, especially the living president, and fourth, the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

So it is okay to vote for a wicked woman though?

Second, compare the people Trump has said he would appoint to the courts as opposed to Hillary. Want to kill the Constitution? Hillary will do it.

Too bad your boy couldn't focus on issues instead of hate, name calling, and focos on his own arrogancey.

I get it now, you are a troll who actually likes Trump but is committed to making her supporters look ridiculous, right?

[larsenb]

Trumpies are excited, I'm not sure about what. Maybe they thought he had an F in the first debate, so a D- is an approvement. . . .

Rewcox earns an F- in his evaluation of both debates. Who is not surprised?

Actually, Trump knocked Hillary out of the park in last night's debate . . . and we can only hope he'll knock her straight into jail after he's elected.

Let's see, Trump is down 11 points since the first debate. You need to look at how you evaluate.

Here an expose of the poll rewcox is all excited about, located here: Media Polling Fully Exposed – About That NBC/WSJ Clinton +11 Point Poll…. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... ore-123009" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Part of the lead in:

. . . . . You have probably seen the latest example of the media claiming a released presidential poll from NBC and The Wall Street Journal as an example of Hillary Clinton expanding to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the “controversial” leaked tape of Donald Trump.

The claim is complete and utter nonsense. Here’s the proof. . .

. . .

The gist of the article is that all the pollsters quoted work for Hillary superpacs, etc., or are in Hillary's pocket, one way or another..

Here is a story posted by dconrad000 on his thread showing how one of rewcox's favorite news sources, CNN, faked their poll on the results of the last Trump/Hillary debate: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=9823&start=2790#p741685" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

CNN RIGS ITS OWN POLL AGAIN TO CLAIM CLINTON WON THE DEBATE

Democrats oversampled, poll contradicted by consensus that Trump won big

Paul Joseph Watson - OCTOBER 10, 2016

CNN was forced to rig its own poll yet again in order to claim that Hillary Clinton won last night’s debate, despite the overwhelming consensus that Donald Trump scored a clear victory.

http://www.infowars.com/cnn-rigs-its-ow ... he-debate/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[larsenb]

“… to vote for wicked men, it would be sin,” said Hyrum Smith. (Documentary History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 323.)

And so four great civic standards for the faithful Saints are, first, the Constitution ordained by God through wise men; second, the scriptures, particularly the Book of Mormon; third, the inspired counsel of the prophets, especially the living president, and fourth, the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

So it is okay to vote for a wicked woman though?

Second, compare the people Trump has said he would appoint to the courts as opposed to Hillary. Want to kill the Constitution? Hillary will do it.

Too bad your boy couldn't focus on issues instead of hate, name calling, and focos on his own arrogancey.

rewcox: "focos[ed] on his own arrogancey."

[markharr]

Rewcox earns an F- in his evaluation of both debates. Who is not surprised?

Actually, Trump knocked Hillary out of the park in last night's debate . . . and we can only hope he'll knock her straight into jail after he's elected.

Let's see, Trump is down 11 points since the first debate. You need to look at how you evaluate.

Here an expose of the poll rewcox is all excited about, located here: Media Polling Fully Exposed – About That NBC/WSJ Clinton +11 Point Poll…. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... ore-123009" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Part of the lead in:

. . . . . You have probably seen the latest example of the media claiming a released presidential poll from NBC and The Wall Street Journal as an example of Hillary Clinton expanding to an 11 point lead in the weekend following the “controversial” leaked tape of Donald Trump.

The claim is complete and utter nonsense. Here’s the proof. . .

. . .

The gist of the article is that all the pollsters quoted work for Hillary superpacs, etc., or are in Hillary's pocket, one way or another..

Here is a story posted by dconrad000 on his thread showing how one of rewcox's favorite news sources, CNN, faked their poll on the results of the last Trump/Hillary debate: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=9823&start=2790#p741685" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

CNN RIGS ITS OWN POLL AGAIN TO CLAIM CLINTON WON THE DEBATE

Democrats oversampled, poll contradicted by consensus that Trump won big

Paul Joseph Watson - OCTOBER 10, 2016

CNN was forced to rig its own poll yet again in order to claim that Hillary Clinton won last night’s debate, despite the overwhelming consensus that Donald Trump scored a clear victory.

http://www.infowars.com/cnn-rigs-its-ow ... he-debate/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Saw this from the Trump rally in PA last night. CNN actually packed up and left.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIrcWs2SfZc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[shadow]

14666242_10210847299248661_8629413665356807677_n.jpg (32.46 KiB) Viewed 660 times

[JK4Woods]

Four Items to consider.
Putting aside the fact of the complete and utter reprehensible character and personalities of both major party candidates,

One party winning the White House will counter increased Abortion rights and practices. Maybe even de-fund Planned Parenthood baby part harvesting. This same party will preserve Second Amendment rights. And perhaps most important of all... flush out the entrenched liberal government apparatchicks from all the goverment agencies, and appoint new conservative leaders for every department of the US government. Not to mention having a chance to turn back the creeping liberalism on the Supreme Court bench.

The other major party is guaranteed to maintain the status quo and even ramp up the agenda of the current lame duck occupier of the White House.

Hold your nose, tip your head back and take your medicine.
Don't become the laughing stock (and inconsequential) group who thought Ross Perot had a snowball's chance in hades of usurping the power base of either major party.

Someone's got to pump out the septic tank...