Obama is Jewish according this crazy lady

[dauser]

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xzsGtKoEO0A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Perhaps someone with more time could check out the links.

[dauser]

The Jews don't seem to want to claim him as one of their own.

[David13]

Well, no, since he hates Jews and wants to see them driven into the sea and exterminated, along with all his Palestinian buddies.
dc

[Mala_Suerte]

Doesn't really matter whether he's Jewish or not. We all know where his allegiance lies, and it's not w/ Christians or those who follow the Constitution - in other words non-socialists.

[dauser]

To the Muslim, the Koran trumps The Constitution.
To the Jew, the Talmud trumps The Constitution.

Neither faith will send missionaries to your door and sell you a copy of divine enlightenment...they do not want you to know what their divine enlightenment says behind your back.

Obama says he is Christian...that is all we really need to know.

[David13]

He also says that no American should own a gun. He also says he has the solution to every problem there is.
Is that what we know?
dc

[dauser]

Is it more raciest to want a Jewish president or a black president?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRZfKiDrYBU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[dauser]

Obama is doing to the US what Angela Merkel is doing to Germany...and she too is Jewish according to.

https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1125773/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I wonder if Obama is a dual citizen Israeli like Angela Merkel?

Why is Obama keeping his personal records sealed? What is he hiding?

If Obama were a dual citizen, that would explain all the US Tents, missiles, guns, ammo, rations, Toyota trucks, money, mercenaries, internet support, being air dropped to ISIS by the US.

That would explain why ISIS does not attack Israel and why wounded ISIS solders go to Israeli hospitals not Islamic hospitals.

That might explain why the White House and the US media is so upset with Putin bombing ISIS targets.

[skmo]

To the Muslim, the Koran trumps The Constitution.
To the Jew, the Talmud trumps The Constitution.

Would you also say:
"To a Pentecostal Baptist, the Holy Bible trumps the Constitution" and
"To the LDS, the Book of Mormon trumps the Constitution"

Because if you didn't, I'd have to disagree with you. I've watched rabid, near psychotic Bible thumpers screeching their indignities about the Kentucky clerk because she chose to uphold God's law rather than man's law (blithely ignoring the fact that she was simply too ignorant to understand she wasn't doing right according to either side.) In discussions with many "Born again" type religious folk, I've often heard the proclamation that we have no responsibility to know or understand the law of the land, that we need to push to have the "Word O' God" put in place to rule over us like the foundling fathers (it was pronounced like that to me, I didn't misspell it) wanted.

I grew up learning about how important religion is in life. I have spent much of my life learning how terrible religion is in life.

As for the LDS beliefs, I know that many would say there's no need to choose the BOM over the Constitution because the BOM foretells of, and wants us to support the Constitution. Regardless, if the Constitution were amended to require me to do something against my principles, you may be assured I would die on that hill. If the time comes I have to choose between obeying the law and obeying God's Word, I choose the latter.

[Ezra]

To the Muslim, the Koran trumps The Constitution.
To the Jew, the Talmud trumps The Constitution.

Would you also say:
"To a Pentecostal Baptist, the Holy Bible trumps the Constitution" and
"To the LDS, the Book of Mormon trumps the Constitution"

Because if you didn't, I'd have to disagree with you. I've watched rabid, near psychotic Bible thumpers screeching their indignities about the Kentucky clerk because she chose to uphold God's law rather than man's law (blithely ignoring the fact that she was simply too ignorant to understand she wasn't doing right according to either side.) In discussions with many "Born again" type religious folk, I've often heard the proclamation that we have no responsibility to know or understand the law of the land, that we need to push to have the "Word O' God" put in place to rule over us like the foundling fathers (it was pronounced like that to me, I didn't misspell it) wanted.

I grew up learning about how important religion is in life. I have spent much of my life learning how terrible religion is in life.

As for the LDS beliefs, I know that many would say there's no need to choose the BOM over the Constitution because the BOM foretells of, and wants us to support the Constitution. Regardless, if the Constitution were amended to require me to do something against my principles, you may be assured I would die on that hill. If the time comes I have to choose between obeying the law and obeying God's Word, I choose the latter.

The constitution is like scripture to me. Since God cliamed authorship of it.
Do we change scripture add or subtract??
No. But yet anyone who wants to can if they so choose to.
Should we change the constitution?
No but we have anyways.
D&c 98 says

4 And now, verily I say unto you concerning the laws of the land, it is my will that my people should observe to do all things whatsoever I command them.

5 And that law of the land which is constitutional, supporting that principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to all mankind, and is justifiable before me.

6 Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land;

7 And as pertaining to law of man, whatsoever is more or less than this, cometh of evil.

Vs 4 the lord says obey (him)not the laws of the land.

In addition to obeying the lord
Vs 5 we obey the constitution he created.
Vs 6 befriend the laws that are constitutional.
Vs 7 anything more or less then (this) <---- being the constitution he created. Cometh evil.

All changes to the lords constitution just as with scriptures will come evil.
If we look at the history of the amendments to the constitution after the first 10 which is how the lord created it. Every single amendment has brought about evil just as lord said it would.

So skmo you should have no fear of obeying the constitution as God intended and asked if us to follow. Only obey the first 10 amendment that God created. And know the principles they promote.

You might also say that we obey the laws of the constitution if translated correctly. Like the bible it has wording that can be twisted to mean things other the the lords intent.
That's my belief and feelings.

[dauser]

If Obama was really Jewish, he would have disarmed the american people by now, by executive order and air dropped them all to ISIS...he hasn't.

1968: The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from JEW Rep. Emanuel Celler’s House bill H.R. 17735
1988: Senate bill S. 1523 is sponsored by JEW Senator Howard Metzenbaum
1988: JEW Senator Metzenbaum co-sponsors a bill - S. 2180
1990: JEW Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990,
1993: Senate bill S.653 is sponsored by JEW Sen. Howard Metzenbaum.
1994: JEW Senator Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka “Brady II.” jew Rep. Schumer sponsored “Brady II” sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives.

1993: Senate bill S.653 is sponsored by JEW Sen. Howard Metzenbaum. It bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at a later date.

February, 1994: The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy handguns, becomes effective. JEW Senator Metzenbaum wrote the Brady Bill. Metzenbaum sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill in the House was Jewish Rep. Charles Schumer.
1994: Jewish Senator Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka “Brady II.” Jewish Rep. Schumer sponsored “Brady II” sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives.

September, 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as “assault weapons.” [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate by Jewish Senator Dianne Feinstein and authored in the House by Jewish Congressman Schumer.

1995: Jewish Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg and others introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being unconstitutional.

September, 1996: The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It was sponsored by Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun.

1997: Senate bill S. 54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997, proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws, including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It was introduced by Jew Dianne Feinstein and a non-Jewish Senator [Hatch], among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense.

January, 1999: Jewish Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.193, the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999.
January, 1999: Jewish Senator Kohl introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety Lock Act of 1999. It would to require a child safety lock in connection with transfer of a handgun.

February, 1999: Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.407, the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999
February, 1999: Jewish Senator Lautenberg introduces S.443, the Gun Show Accountability Act of 1999.

March, 1999: Jewish Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.560, the Gun Industry Accountability Act of 1999

March, 1999: Jewish Senator Feinstein introduces bill S.594, the Large Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999.

May, 2000: Senate bill S. 2515, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000, is submitted by Jewish Senator Feinstein, Jewish Senator Barbara Boxer, Jewish Sen. Lautenberg and Jewish Sen. Schumer. It is a plan for a national firearms licensing system.

January, 2001: Senate bill S.25, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2001, is sponsored by Jews Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer. It is a nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill].

May, 2003: Jewish Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer and others introduce legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban is scheduled to expire in September, 2004.

October, 2003: Jewish Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin and Schumer co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending] of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.

March, 2005: Jewish Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.645, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994"] which expired in late 2004.

[dauser]

Lots of crypto types:
http://mindbodypolitic.com/2015/09/03/a ... -converso/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;