Page 1 of 2

WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 1:30 pm
by Col. Flagg
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... n-control/
The White House confirmed that President Obama was preparing a series of executive actions on gun control to match his recent passion on the issue after the latest mass shooting in Oregon.

“It’s a high priority and will continue to be until we start to see more progress on this issue in this town,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters today at the press briefing.

Earnest said he would “quibble” with anyone who criticized the president for not voicing any specific gun control proposals during his press conference, asserting that the White House was working behind the scenes for more executive actions on guns.
Of course he is. X( How much longer before they go all out and issue a total private gun ban? I know the Prophet Joseph Smith issued a prophecy about guns being banned in the U.S. at some point - I think it was in conjunction to his prophecy about the next great civil war starting in Chicago owing to the devaluation of our currency, but can't recall exactly.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 2:33 pm
by Army Of Truth
All Obama (and his cronies) need are a couple more mass shootings by psychos drugged up on psychiatric drugs, then the mainstream media plays these shootings 24/7 on our TVs and how these murderers easily obtained "scary black assault" rifles at some gun dealer, while at the same time being purposefully silent about the psychiatric drugs involved, and how we need to get rid of the "scary black assault" rifles in order to keep all of us and our children safe, and that we have to "do something" about this and anyone who doesn't, is contributing to these heinous crimes that we all are accountable for. Then they can pass these gun-grabbing draconian laws that the elite already have written up and ready, and have their "rubber-stamp" congress pass it, then the American citizen-sheeple will gladly hand in their guns in exchange for their safety. :( X(

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 5th, 2015, 2:42 pm
by markharr
I don't fear Obama. I fear god. I know that in the end Obama and what he stands for will lose.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 7:46 am
by Sandinista
Army Of Truth wrote:All Obama (and his cronies) need are a couple more mass shootings by psychos drugged up on psychiatric drugs, then the mainstream media plays these shootings 24/7 on our TVs and how these murderers easily obtained "scary black assault" rifles at some gun dealer, while at the same time being purposefully silent about the psychiatric drugs involved, and how we need to get rid of the "scary black assault" rifles in order to keep all of us and our children safe, and that we have to "do something" about this and anyone who doesn't, is contributing to these heinous crimes that we all are accountable for. Then they can pass these gun-grabbing draconian laws that the elite already have written up and ready, and have their "rubber-stamp" congress pass it, then the American citizen-sheeple will gladly hand in their guns in exchange for their safety. :( X(
I have a solution! The last AR 15 I just finished building I did in "flat dark earth", which is a light brown color, isn't "black", and thus isn't scary at all! Problem solved! :)

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 9:26 am
by Robin Hood
There was a case over the weekend where an 11 year old boy shot dead an 8 year old girl in Tennessee.
Apparently the little girl wouldn't let him see her new puppy.

This has got to stop. If an executive order is the only way to stop the carnage then he'll probably go down that route I would expect.
Politically he can't do nothing, so what other options does he have?

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 1:26 pm
by Sandinista
Robin Hood wrote:There was a case over the weekend where an 11 year old boy shot dead an 8 year old girl in Tennessee.
Apparently the little girl wouldn't let him see her new puppy.

This has got to stop. If an executive order is the only way to stop the carnage then he'll probably go down that route I would expect.
Politically he can't do nothing, so what other options does he have?
"Detectives have arrested two people on suspicion of murder after PC David Phillips was mown down and killed by a stolen pick-up truck.

The two men, aged 18 and 30 years from the Oxton and Wallasey areas of Wirral have been taken to police stations on Merseyside where they will be interviewed.

PC Phillips, 34, died from internal injuries a post-mortem exam found today.

He was hit by the Mitsubishi Challenger L200 vehicle which was being pursued by police and had mounted a central reservation." (Mirror, 6 Oct 2015)
This has got to stop! You guys in England need to ban all cars so that the killing will stop!

See how silly it is to think that banning guns will somehow stop someone from killing someone else?

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 1:39 pm
by Robin Hood
No, not really.
Only makes sense if you're comparing apples with oranges, so to speak.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 1:41 pm
by Serragon
Robin Hood wrote:There was a case over the weekend where an 11 year old boy shot dead an 8 year old girl in Tennessee.
Apparently the little girl wouldn't let him see her new puppy.
Blame the Tool? Check
Push for violation of constitutional rights? Check
Ignore constitutional process for legislation? Check

Would any of the changes proposed by Obama have saved the 8 yr old girl? No.

Great Post Robin Hood!

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 2:04 pm
by Robin Hood
Yes.
The boy wouldn't have found his father's gun because he wouldn't have one.
It's a no brainer.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 2:11 pm
by BTH&T
Robin Hood wrote:Yes.
The boy wouldn't have found his father's gun because he wouldn't have one.
It's a no brainer.
Satan used this same argument in the war in Heaven.
Promising that all would be safe, no suffering, no pain.

Life is pain and suffering. It is also Joy and progression.
Free agency is more important than mortal death and suffering.

Same struggle going on today, many wanting to take away free agency in the name of safety/security!
I chose free agency, knowing there is suffering involved.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 2:31 pm
by Robin Hood
Those who live by the sword die by the sword.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 2:38 pm
by Sandinista
Robin Hood wrote:No, not really.
Only makes sense if you're comparing apples with oranges, so to speak.
What's the difference? Murder is murder. It doesn't make any difference whether you murder someone with a hammer, a knife, a screwdriver, a car, poison, or whatever. It's still murder. Look up "Intentional homicide rate", which means murder by any means. This is what you get. The good old USA is not even in the top 100. Here's the link to the data (you can use the little buttons on the chart to sort up and down, alphabetically, etc.).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... icide_rate" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You need to stop believing what the sensationalized press would have you believe and start, as you call it, comparing apples to apples.

Maybe we should ban all the kitchen knives, cricket bats, tire irons, rat poisons, cars, fertilizer (because it can make bombs, the cause of the biggest mass murder by a domestic terrorists in American history, e.g., the Oklahoma City bombing), or airplanes (the cause of the biggest mass murder in the world, the World Trade Center terrorist attack), or even rocks because I think that's probably what Cain used to kill Able. Do you get my point? Guns are not the problem, people who kill are the problem, Guns are just the tool they choose to use.

Maybe we should ban forks and spoons because that's the tool overeaters who die from obesity use to "kill" themselves.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 2:40 pm
by BTH&T
Robin Hood wrote:Those who live by the sword die by the sword.
How I die is not as important as how I live!

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 3:04 pm
by Dave62
You folks are talking about the dreadful case of the 11 year old boy shooting his neighbour. The problem lies not with the fact that his father has a gun but with the fact that the boy gained access to it! My children were the same age when I taught them how to handle firearms and how to shoot and clean them. But I was always right next to them supervising. How does an 11 year old boy get to his father's gun? "Secure you gun=secure your sport" Pretty simple isn't it? Guns are not toys for children. They are worthwhile tools and weapons and I think more young people should be taught to respect them. But why are American children shooting American children? We all accept the argument that bad guys will always break the law and use weapons to commit crime, but how are American children getting their hands onto guns? X(

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 3:19 pm
by Robin Hood
Sandinista wrote:
Robin Hood wrote:No, not really.
Only makes sense if you're comparing apples with oranges, so to speak.
What's the difference? Murder is murder. It doesn't make any difference whether you murder someone with a hammer, a knife, a screwdriver, a car, poison, or whatever. It's still murder. Look up "Intentional homicide rate", which means murder by any means. This is what you get. The good old USA is not even in the top 100. Here's the link to the data (you can use the little buttons on the chart to sort up and down, alphabetically, etc.).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... icide_rate" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You need to stop believing what the sensationalized press would have you believe and start, as you call it, comparing apples to apples.

Maybe we should ban all the kitchen knives, cricket bats, tire irons, rat poisons, cars, fertilizer (because it can make bombs, the cause of the biggest mass murder by a domestic terrorists in American history, e.g., the Oklahoma City bombing), or airplanes (the cause of the biggest mass murder in the world, the World Trade Center terrorist attack), or even rocks because I think that's probably what Cain used to kill Able. Do you get my point? Guns are not the problem, people who kill are the problem, Guns are just the tool they choose to use.

Maybe we should ban forks and spoons because that's the tool overeaters who die from obesity use to "kill" themselves.
Kitchen knives have a purpose other than as a weapon.
Guns, especially hand guns do not. They're designed for killing people; they don't have another use.
Aeroplanes caused the biggest mass murder... really? Did you forget about the Nazi gas chambers?

Gun murders per 100,000 in the US = 3.55
Gun murders per 100,000 in the UK = 0.05

However, the US has plenty of company. The following countries have a similar or worse record:
Venezuela
Swaziland
Nicaragua
Colombia
Costa Rica
Panama
El Salvador.......

The difference is that all of thses countries, with the exception of the US, are third world countries. All first world countries, with the aforementioned exception of the US, have numbers similar to the UK.

The figures speak for themselves. Something is wrong.

Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not saying the UK is great and the US isn't (I like Americans, very much. They are warm, friendly and very hospitable), I'm just pointing out that something is very wrong with a first world society that, in this respect at least, operates third world standards and appears to have very little appetite for tackling the problem.

I know about the constitution and the right to bare arms etc, but a right is not necessarily an obligation. From here it appears that many Americans are either paranoid, or afraid.
My question is, what are they afraid of?

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 3:46 pm
by Serragon
I have yet to meet a European who understood the American idea of liberty and freedom as espoused by our founding fathers. There are fewer and fewer Americans who understand it. Without understanding that idea you will never understand why guns are important to Americans.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 3:47 pm
by BTH&T
Robin Hood wrote: My question is, what are they afraid of?
Though many don't want to say it, the overriding purpose is to fight against the Government.
That is why it was put in to begin with, to prevent tyranny!

A question to you:
Do you believe in total free agency, even if others get hurt or die?

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 3:52 pm
by Serragon
Robin Hood --

It's that same reason that guy in your avatar carries a bow :)

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 4:18 pm
by Jason
Col. Flagg wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... n-control/
The White House confirmed that President Obama was preparing a series of executive actions on gun control to match his recent passion on the issue after the latest mass shooting in Oregon.

“It’s a high priority and will continue to be until we start to see more progress on this issue in this town,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters today at the press briefing.

Earnest said he would “quibble” with anyone who criticized the president for not voicing any specific gun control proposals during his press conference, asserting that the White House was working behind the scenes for more executive actions on guns.
Of course he is. X( How much longer before they go all out and issue a total private gun ban? I know the Prophet Joseph Smith issued a prophecy about guns being banned in the U.S. at some point - I think it was in conjunction to his prophecy about the next great civil war starting in Chicago owing to the devaluation of our currency, but can't recall exactly.
This is wonderfully awesome! There's a reason Obama is the best gun salesman in the world right now!!!

There's a Joseph Smith prophecy for nearly everything isn't there....

Obama's been given credit for a $9 billion boost to the firearms industry....bet he wishes he had just even a 1% commission...but I also bet his financial handlers have a few dollars invested in firearm manufacturers....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the- ... ry-so-far/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
From 2001 to 2007, gun production held steady at between 3 million and 4 million units a year. It topped 4 million in 2008 but shot to 5.6 million in 2009, held steady in 2010 and then spiked to 8.6 million guns in 2012 and a record 10.8 million in 2013, according to ATF data.

In 2000, 51 percent of Americans said guns made homes more dangerous, according to Gallup, the polling firm. By last year, that had dropped to 30 percent, and a full 63 percent now said guns made a home “safer.”

California’s background checks hit 199,833 in March — 20 percent more than the previous monthly high and about twice as much as the average for March over the last decade.

Nationally, concealed carry permits have grown from 4.6 million in 2007 to more than 12 million now, Mr. Lott said.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... /?page=all" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
2007: U.S. has by far the highest rate of private gun ownership in the world: 88 guns per 100 people. (Next on the list is Yemen, at 55 guns per 100.) At the conservative estimate of 270 million guns, Americans have stockpiled almost half of the privately owned firearms in the world.
http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/publicat ... -2007.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That was pre-Obama...our greatest gun salesman in the history of this country!!!
Newly released August records show that the FBI posted 1.7 million background checks required of gun purchasers at federally licensed dealers, the highest number recorded in any August since gun checks began in 1998. The numbers follow new monthly highs for June (1.5 million) and July (1.6 million), a period which spans a series of deadly gun attacks — from Charleston to Roanoke — and proposals for additional firearm legislation.

While the FBI does not track actual gun sales, as multiple firearms can be included in a transaction by a single buyer, the National Instant Criminal Background Check System's numbers are an indicator of a market upswing in the face of growing anxiety about access to guns.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... /71703118/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Gun stocks surge 70% in 2015 alone
http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/05/investi ... urge-2015/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

There's an estimated 18,187,052 active duty military personnel in the world.
There have been 65,376,373 background checks completed for Americans purchasing firearms since February of 2009, the first full month of Barack Obama's presidency.

By comparison, the number of background checks in Obama's first term is 91.1% higher than President George W. Bush's first-term total of 34,214,066.
http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-wi ... first-term" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That's as of February 11, 2013...and at that point enough firearms to arm every professional soldier in the world with at least 3 firearms since Obama took office.
“2013 was the best year for firearm sales (commercial, domestic) in history — period! That’s true for NH to Hawaii,” said Richard Feldman, president of the Independent Firearm Owners Association in Rindge, N.H. “Ruger alone sold well over one million guns this year.”

Mr. Feldman said to expect the next surge to be in bullets.

“Ammunition will still be very strong in 2014 as it hasn’t caught up nationally with the demand,” he said.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... /?page=all" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A background check is conducted only in store purchases.
http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/19/news/gu ... nd-checks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

...typically new firearm sales...
Data from the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) indicate that firearm acquisitions set a new record during June, July and August, and are on track to finish the year higher than any year except 2013, when firearm acquisitions soared in reaction to President Obama’s push for gun control.

There were more than 2.6 million firearm acquisition-related checks during June through August 2015, a figure 100,000 higher than was achieved during the 2013 surge, and well above the figures for any other year since NICS’ inception in November 1998.

For the first eight months of 2015, January through August, the number of firearm acquisition-related checks was the second highest on record, at 7.7 million, well behind the 9.3 million tallied during the 2013 surge, but running 365,000 ahead of the number achieved last year.
http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/15/summe ... gun-sales/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
From its inception in 1998 until the end of 2014, NICS processed a total of 202,536,522 transactions, 1,166,676 of which have been denied.
http://www.thetrace.org/2015/07/backgro ... -shooting/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Or more than 11 firearms for every professional soldier in the world...and that's just 1998 to 2014...not including the historical stockpile prior to 1998 nor including more record breaking sales in 2015...

I just wonder if we aren't nearing capacity or at least close to the tipping point....since there are very realistically more private firearms in the country than there are people (men, women, and children) to shoot them...hat's off to Obama though for his salesmanship in keeping it going!!!

Go Obama Go!!!!!

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 5:31 pm
by The ward heretic
Robin Hood wrote:
Sandinista wrote:
Robin Hood wrote:No, not really.
Only makes sense if you're comparing apples with oranges, so to speak.
What's the difference? Murder is murder. It doesn't make any difference whether you murder someone with a hammer, a knife, a screwdriver, a car, poison, or whatever. It's still murder. Look up "Intentional homicide rate", which means murder by any means. This is what you get. The good old USA is not even in the top 100. Here's the link to the data (you can use the little buttons on the chart to sort up and down, alphabetically, etc.).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... icide_rate" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You need to stop believing what the sensationalized press would have you believe and start, as you call it, comparing apples to apples.

Maybe we should ban all the kitchen knives, cricket bats, tire irons, rat poisons, cars, fertilizer (because it can make bombs, the cause of the biggest mass murder by a domestic terrorists in American history, e.g., the Oklahoma City bombing), or airplanes (the cause of the biggest mass murder in the world, the World Trade Center terrorist attack), or even rocks because I think that's probably what Cain used to kill Able. Do you get my point? Guns are not the problem, people who kill are the problem, Guns are just the tool they choose to use.

Maybe we should ban forks and spoons because that's the tool overeaters who die from obesity use to "kill" themselves.
Kitchen knives have a purpose other than as a weapon.
Guns, especially hand guns do not. They're designed for killing people; they don't have another use.
Aeroplanes caused the biggest mass murder... really? Did you forget about the Nazi gas chambers?

Gun murders per 100,000 in the US = 3.55
Gun murders per 100,000 in the UK = 0.05

However, the US has plenty of company. The following countries have a similar or worse record:
Venezuela
Swaziland
Nicaragua
Colombia
Costa Rica
Panama
El Salvador.......

The difference is that all of thses countries, with the exception of the US, are third world countries. All first world countries, with the aforementioned exception of the US, have numbers similar to the UK.

The figures speak for themselves. Something is wrong.

Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not saying the UK is great and the US isn't (I like Americans, very much. They are warm, friendly and very hospitable), I'm just pointing out that something is very wrong with a first world society that, in this respect at least, operates third world standards and appears to have very little appetite for tackling the problem.

I know about the constitution and the right to bare arms etc, but a right is not necessarily an obligation. From here it appears that many Americans are either paranoid, or afraid.
My question is, what are they afraid of?
What's the big problem? Even in the US so few people die from fire arms compared to other means. With the amount of guns here, it's a bloody miracle that our gun homiacides are so low. It speaks highly of the American people; especially those that own guns.

What are we scared of? You, to be blunt. People like you who have a grand idea of control to save humanity from itself. Force from the masses terrifies me. A slave that loves slavery scares the hell out of me.

Every time I go to the UK, I am blown away how Much Brits love the force of government. They bathe with, and occasionally brush with it. I have met only a few Brits that understand true human freedom unfettered.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 6th, 2015, 10:55 pm
by BTH&T
Sandinista wrote:
Robin Hood wrote:No, not really.
Only makes sense if you're comparing apples with oranges, so to speak.
What's the difference? Murder is murder. It doesn't make any difference whether you murder someone with a hammer, a knife, a screwdriver, a car, poison, or whatever. It's still murder. Look up "Intentional homicide rate", which means murder by any means. This is what you get. The good old USA is not even in the top 100. Here's the link to the data (you can use the little buttons on the chart to sort up and down, alphabetically, etc.).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c ... icide_rate" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You need to stop believing what the sensationalized press would have you believe and start, as you call it, comparing apples to apples.

Maybe we should ban all the kitchen knives, cricket bats, tire irons, rat poisons, cars, fertilizer (because it can make bombs, the cause of the biggest mass murder by a domestic terrorists in American history, e.g., the Oklahoma City bombing), or airplanes (the cause of the biggest mass murder in the world, the World Trade Center terrorist attack), or even rocks because I think that's probably what Cain used to kill Able. Do you get my point? Guns are not the problem, people who kill are the problem, Guns are just the tool they choose to use.

Maybe we should ban forks and spoons because that's the tool overeaters who die from obesity use to "kill" themselves.
Great info, thanks for link

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 7th, 2015, 12:28 am
by skmo
Robin Hood wrote:No, not really.
Only makes sense if you're comparing apples with oranges, so to speak.
I have no problem with doing that.

Both are in the Kingdom Plantae, both are angiosperms, both are Eudicots. Both are edible items grown on trees. Both have fruit flesh inside an outer skin. Both have seeds. Both have some level of sweetness to the taste. Both have some level of tart to the taste. Both can be squeezed to make juice.

Off the top of my head, there are ten ways the two can be compared. (I'm lucky in knowing the scientific terminology because I helped my wife make a Science test for her students earlier.) It is silly, at least to many thinking Americans.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 7th, 2015, 12:36 am
by skmo
Robin Hood wrote:I know about the constitution and the right to bare arms etc, but a right is not necessarily an obligation. From here it appears that many Americans are either paranoid, or afraid.
My question is, what are they afraid of?
What do you care if my arms are bare or covered with sleeves?

We're afraid of the government that our ancestors created by killing your ancestors. We're afraid that our own government may try to become like the tyrants that made our ancestors leave in the first place. We're afraid of being put into a situation where we may have to defend ourselves but we've been unarmed by a government that demands that we be SUBJECTS to them rather than free citizens.

No man fears to kneel before the God he trusts, but I don't trust ANY government enough to kneel before them.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 7th, 2015, 12:51 am
by skmo
Robin Hood wrote:Those who live by the sword die by the sword.
Occasionally, those who live by the sword die by the shovel, or the axe, or the garrote.

The U.S. has BY FAR the highest number of guns per capita of all countries in the world. It's estimated that we have over 112 guns per 100 people, meaning we have more guns than people.

HOWEVER,

In terms of homicide rates, we come in at number 111 out of 218 countries or principalities.

Haters gonna hate. Killers gonna kill. Guns gonna protect my fat behind.

Re: WHITE HOUSE: OBAMA PREPARING MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS ON GUN CONTROL

Posted: October 7th, 2015, 1:02 am
by skmo
Robin Hood wrote:Kitchen knives have a purpose other than as a weapon.
Guns, especially hand guns do not. They're designed for killing people; they don't have another use.
Hunting. I've killed deer with a handgun. Would've killed a moose, too, but I didn't have a moose tag.

Gun murders per 100,000 in the US = 3.55
Gun murders per 100,000 in the UK = 0.05[/quote]

Total murders per 100K in the US - 4.7
Total murders per 100K in the UK - 1.0

It's more than just gun laws.