What is an infant's risk for Hepatitis B?

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
Benjamin_LK
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2504
Location: Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
Contact:

What is an infant's risk for Hepatitis B?

Post by Benjamin_LK »

So I was wondering, what is the risk of Hepatitis B for infants? I know it is a bad disease that ruins you, but the transmission method - blood transfusion and sex,doesn't sound like something babies would be at use for, unless the doctors don't throw away their needles. Why not wait a while before giving them the shot?

JohnnyL
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9984

Re: What is an infant's risk for Hepatitis B?

Post by JohnnyL »

The risk is 0. So why, then, does the AMA push it?? :-\

Benjamin_LK
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2504
Location: Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: What is an infant's risk for Hepatitis B?

Post by Benjamin_LK »

JohnnyL wrote:The risk is 0. So why, then, does the AMA push it?? :-\
Not zero, because if the mother has it, she can pass it on to her child via birth or the umbilical cord, however, they viciously test pregnant women for Hepatitis variants, HIV, and other STDs, so if there was a woman who had Hepatitis B, it's unlikely she would go undetected. I am guessing they do it for reasons like eradicating STDs so that people can do whatever they want, but I am bringing it up so that maybe Davedan or some other individual might offer some sourced information on the matter.

JohnnyL
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 9984

Re: What is an infant's risk for Hepatitis B?

Post by JohnnyL »

Benjamin_LK wrote:
JohnnyL wrote:The risk is 0. So why, then, does the AMA push it?? :-\
Not zero, because if the mother has it, she can pass it on to her child via birth or the umbilical cord, however, they viciously test pregnant women for Hepatitis variants, HIV, and other STDs, so if there was a woman who had Hepatitis B, it's unlikely she would go undetected. I am guessing they do it for reasons like eradicating STDs so that people can do whatever they want, but I am bringing it up so that maybe Davedan or some other individual might offer some sourced information on the matter.
Giving a vaccine to someone that already has the disease?

Benjamin_LK
captain of 1,000
Posts: 2504
Location: Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: What is an infant's risk for Hepatitis B?

Post by Benjamin_LK »

JohnnyL wrote:
Benjamin_LK wrote:
JohnnyL wrote:The risk is 0. So why, then, does the AMA push it?? :-\
Not zero, because if the mother has it, she can pass it on to her child via birth or the umbilical cord, however, they viciously test pregnant women for Hepatitis variants, HIV, and other STDs, so if there was a woman who had Hepatitis B, it's unlikely she would go undetected. I am guessing they do it for reasons like eradicating STDs so that people can do whatever they want, but I am bringing it up so that maybe Davedan or some other individual might offer some sourced information on the matter.
Giving a vaccine to someone that already has the disease?
Infants have potential exposure to blood from their mother during birth, which is how they can contract HIV and Hepatitis during birth. However, my point stands that pregnant women get tested multiple times for STDS/blood borne disease multiple times during pregnancy, so there is minimal chance of any false negative. They overwhelmingly know the mother has some kind of disease before the baby is born. They do give vaccines such as rabies, so someone who already has the disease, vaccines aren't about immunity so much as they are about stimulating the immune system to react quickly and help you get better, rabies vaccine is the injections they give you after a potentially rabid animal bites you to make sure you get better from rabies, and not dead.

User avatar
A Random Phrase
Follower of Christ
Posts: 6468
Location: Staring at my computer, not sure whether to laugh or cry.

Re: What is an infant's risk for Hepatitis B?

Post by A Random Phrase »

Plus, there are those couples who don't share needles with anyone because they don't use them and who don't have multiple sexual partners. It should be a no-brainer that the baby does not need that shot (even supposing it really works).

Post Reply