Page 1 of 1

Rethinking Churchill

Posted: January 25th, 2015, 1:14 pm
by ajax
Two Great Essays on Churchill.
https://mises.org/library/rethinking-churchill" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Churchill was from first to last a Man of the State, of the welfare state and of the warfare state."
"Winston Churchill was a Man of Blood and a politico without principle, whose apotheosis serves to corrupt every standard of honesty and morality in politics and history."
Churchill stated, "History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it"

https://mises.org/library/real-churchill" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
With his lack of principles and scruples, Churchill was involved in one way or another in nearly every disaster that befell the 20th century. He helped destroy laissez-faire liberalism, he played a role in the Crash of 1929, he helped start WWI, and by bringing in America to help, prolonged the war and created the conditions for the rise of Nazism, prolonged WWII, laid the groundwork for Soviet domination, helped involve America in a cold war with Russia, and pioneered in the development of total war and undermining western civilized standards.

Re: Rethinking Churchill

Posted: January 25th, 2015, 1:20 pm
by Thomas
You are on a roll lately.

Re: Rethinking Churchill

Posted: January 25th, 2015, 2:58 pm
by ajax
Thomas wrote:You are on a roll lately.
Yeah, my 16 yr old son has expressed interest in war/govt/economics lately which has caused me to do some revisiting myself.

Re: Rethinking Churchill

Posted: January 26th, 2015, 10:04 pm
by mhewett
I've been reading Jack Monnets books on 'Awakening to our awful situation". It's amazing what these past world leaders have done, or maybe the word is shocking, treasonous and just plain evil. We think of Hitler and all of the leaders we commonly think of as evil and our own leaders have been just as bad or even worse. When we learn one day what the hell really went on it's really going to be an eye opener.

Re: Rethinking Churchill

Posted: January 27th, 2015, 6:23 pm
by sushi_chef
this might be too early for 16 yrs old, but to sushi_ intuitively seems very interesting unsanitized real history....

"HALLETT REPORT NO. 3: The History of the Illegitimate British Monarchy

...So he was replaced in favor of Winston Churchill, and Winston Churchill had been the Home Secretary, and he was the illegitimate son of King Edward VII, which meant that he still had royal blood and he was young enough to sire. Maybe we should go on to a little bit on Winston Churchill’s conception.

The person who was to become King Edward VII was notorious for his affairs. And he had an affair with Jenny Jerome Churchill. She was Jenny Jerome, she conceived with King Edward VII and then she immediately married Randolph Churchill, who then became the Master Magistrorum, which is the spiritual head of the Freemasons, based in the Royal Albert Lodge, which is in the base of Kensington Palace in London, which doubles as a nursery for illegitimate children.

Winston Churchill was the illegitimate son of King Edward VII and that’s why he was promoted so heavily. So Winston Churchill was brought in to sire a child with Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon. However, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, before she was engaged to the man who became King George VI, she was engaged to the man who became King Edward VIII. Now King Edward VIII abdicated in 1936. He was crowned in 1936 in about January and he abdicated in December 1936. And he did absolutely everything he could to sabotage his rule.

....

So that meant that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon wasn’t, she was Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon’s maid, and she had a child by artificial insemination – it was one of the first cases of artificial insemination – with Winston Churchill as the sperm donor. And that was the only trace of royal blood. Winston Churchill was also the sperm donor for Princess Margaret. So during World War II Winston Churchill used to take Princess Elizabeth when she was 14 years old into the war room, and the other war cabinet ministers used to say “Why have you got Princess Elizabeth here” and Winston Churchill’s reply was “Well, the war might go on for another twenty years, she needs to be briefed”. But really it was, because Winston Churchill was the father of Princess Elizabeth.

Now if you look at Queen Elizabeth now walking around, she moves exactly the same as Winston Churchill and looks very very similar. But Winston Churchill’s deeds don’t stop there. And we probably talk about Winston Churchill and his affair with his daughter-in-law Pamela Digby Churchill, which resulted in a son. He was born in 1946 and was transferred to America by RAF Supply Pilot Max Aitken II and that child grew up to become Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton is english, he is the biological son of Winston Churchill, he is the half-brother of Queen Elizabeth II and he is the grandson of King Edward VII, and King Edward VII’s byline was ‘The Peacemaker’, and Bill Clinton’s byline is ‘The Peacemaker’. So it just goes on and on and on.
"
http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

churchill rothschilds
http://search.yahoo.co.jp/search?p=chur ... pellState=" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:-B

Re: Rethinking Churchill

Posted: January 27th, 2015, 7:00 pm
by worthit
Wow. If that's all true I am blown away. Wow.