Re: I've turned into a Julie Rowe skeptic
Posted: August 20th, 2014, 2:56 pm
.
Your home for discussing politics, the restored gospel of Jesus Christ, and the principles of liberty.
https://ldsfreedomforum.com/
Like I said above, I don't know a whole lot about Emotion Code and therefore has no right to judge. I am only commenting on "Crown Chakras" and what I know about it. Again, I don't know a whole lot about Emotional Code and was only commenting on the exchanges here. Someone brought up "Chakras" and jrowe agreed to the chakra's comment. I am not attacking you or what you practice in any way, shape or form.bethany wrote:relax. before you pass false judgement.azalea.rubicon wrote:I was starting to get a little good feeling about the whole thread but someone mentioned "Crown Chakra" and that's when I felt this ill feeling that this Emotion Code isn't right. I've read quite a bit about Chakra's and how Kundalini Yoga uses these chakras. Please read a bit about them, it's not of the Lord. The evil one can mix lies and pepper it with truth. I don't know a whole lot about Emotion Code and therefore has no right to judge but just what I've read about Chakra's and when someone mentioned it here made me ill.
"reader just finished searching the document and no matches found"....
that is the response that i get when i turn on the search feature & search the entire book of Emotion Code. Chakra is not once mentioned. so lets continue the conversation based on facts....
bethany wrote:i apologize for my annoyances in this thread. i spent tooooo many years in pain dealing with something that the church does not teach us how to deal with despite thumping our chests & professing to be the mighty warriors of the last days while we tell the victims that they caused their own issue. its a very passive aggressive systematic machinery that turns you into circles. go to your friendly neighborhood priesthood holder, (check) start with your family (check), hometeachers (check), bishop (check)... up your chain... (check). oops, its your fault. repent & you'll be ok, read your scriptures & pray...
the scripture/prayer part was well covered as my child read the entire canon of scripture in her seminary years & continued to do so. service, (check)... after you check everything & you are still broke, its your fault obviously. maybe the fault is in the complete lack of a warrior response. maybe the fault is in sitting down on your hands while the enemy has no problem engaging the saints.
let someone like Dr. Fish creatively engage the enemy & he gets outed. so don't stand up & make yourself peculiar or effective, it'll cost you your salvation.
come on guys. we are the warriors. there is no other army to apply to for relief. but if we all stand around the water cooler comparing nonsensical stories & wistfully wishing we had lived in Joseph's day when the power was evident, then we are not engaged.
while emotion code does not hold itself out to be a means to releasing entities, it lends itself quite well & teaches some phenomenal principles that someone with an imagination can take & run with. that's what i did.
kick it up. get engaged. be what we were told to be.
and i would add... GIVE YOURSELF PERMISSION TO BE WHAT YOU WERE CREATED TO BE.
That was actually kind of my point. Why do you accuse men when god is the one who grants us the ability to be healed. I think most people in the church are trying their best to help people the best way they know how. I just wouldn't throw out the pattern the Lord has provided just because you were not healed. I think the intentions of some giving blessings and advice can at times be over reaching or grasping because they don't know what to say or how to help. "I'm guilty" Sometimes I really want to help and maybe I have reached out a little too far and overstepped my bounds but not because it was lack of love for the person. My wife went through some really dark times for a year or so and I gave her blessings all the time almost daily, she tried many many different things to help her and finally found a modern medicine that was an answer to her prayers even though no priesthood authority prescribed what she needed. I am glad you found peace.bethany wrote:Btw, as much as I would love to ignore the falsehood here.... I absolutely do not equate any mans voice with being that of God. Their lack of ability in no way reflects Gods ability or concern for us. It was the absolute knowledge that he would heal us that allowed me to press on. So, sorry. I do not falsely accuse God because men do not fulfill their role.e-eye wrote:
So it's the leaders of the church at fault because you were not healed? Wouldn't you just be better off or equal in saying it's God's fault for not giving you the answers to be healed or healing you?
bethany wrote:I hear garbage all the time regarding energy healing that paints all of it with a wide brush, just as the message behind this thread. Julie Rowe is deceived because an Angel taught her about a healing system. That accusation is inflammatory & designed to malign someone. If we choose not to like her book, then so be it. But do not slander someone when you have no clue what you are maligning. Read a book before expressing an opinion on it. If you want to malign her book... Read that one & then opine. If you want to go further & attack her relationship with Nelson, then you have to read his premise before castigating. Seeing something is needed to express an opinion.
bethany wrote:Do you tell the person that you were unable to help that it is their fault? I do not fault men for not having the power to heal my daughter. I fault them for repeatedly suggesting that she did something wrong to cause it, creating a lie in her belief system that God hated her because she was being punished. This silly girl would not even kiss boys much less sin. If we do not know something, say... Gee this escapes me. That is my issue. My child was suicidal over this.
:ymapplause: :YMAPPLAUSE: :YMAPPLAUSE: :YMAPPLAUSE: :YMAPPLAUSE:bethany wrote:It would be most interesting to me to witness you in his day. For you to be the one he sent off to England on a mission... While he back home canoodles your legal & lawful wife away from you into his nest & then exed you because you protested. If I wanted to control the herd I would make such statements also. Was stealing a mans wife the doctrine of devils or Gods? Was condemning a man to eternal damnation by excommunication because you wanted his wife a doctrine of devils or Gods? I think we all pick & choose and feign what we will to be the word of The Lord. Energy healing does not pretend to be the word of The Lord unto the body of the church. It is a tool just like penicillin & medical remedies. Did chiropractic come to the world via God's annointed? Did radiology come to the earth via the Lords annointed? Let us be as the Amish & live within the tools, homes, vehicles & appliances that the prophet has time to secure the plans to the earth. Personally I think everybody on the planet has the right to revelation. If you catch us trying to sneak up to the podium during general conference & sabotaging the TelePrompter to trick those gentlemen into reading in the Emotion Code as canonized doctrine, then by all means have at it. Nobody has made it a saving ordinance.thescott3000 wrote:If only the prophet would come out and say something on the matter... oh wait he has! Brigham Young says:
If the Lord Almighty should reveal to a High Priest, or to any other than the head, things that are true, or that have been and will be, and show to him the destiny of this people twenty-five years from now, or a new doctrine that will in five, ten, or twenty years hence become the doctrine of this Church and Kingdom, but which has not yet been revealed to this people, and reveal it to him by the same Spirit, the same messenger, the same voice, the same power that gave revelations to Joseph when he was living, it would be a blessing to that High Priest, or individual; but he must rarely divulge it to a second person on the face of the earth, until God reveals it through the proper source to become the property of the people at large. Therefore when you hear Elders say that God does not reveal through the President of the Church that which they know, and tell wonderful things, you may generally set it down as a God’s truth that the revelation they have had is from the Devil, and not from God. If they had received from the proper source, the same power that revealed to them would have shown them that they must keep the things revealed in their own bosoms, and they seldom would have a desire to disclose them to the second person (DBY, 338).
It doesnt get any clearer than that. But it doesnt matter, it seems that most people have already made up their minds and no one can tell them otherwise.