Really that manner of man ?
- SmallFarm
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 4643
- Location: Holbrook, Az
- Contact:
Re: Really that manner of man ?
There's a difference between condemning an act as sin and condemning a person committing that act. One we are commanded to do, the other we should avoid unless directly guided by God to do so.
-
log
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2077
- Location: The Fireplace of Affliction
Re: Really that manner of man ?
The example of Nephi and Laban complicates that position - or, at least, it ought to complicate it.SmallFarm wrote:There's a difference between condemning an act as sin and condemning a person committing that act. One we are commanded to do, the other we should avoid unless directly guided by God to do so.
- SmallFarm
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 4643
- Location: Holbrook, Az
- Contact:
Re: Really that manner of man ?
The example of Nephi and Laban validates my position, perhaps you have misunderstood me... Or do I misunderstand you? :-\log wrote:The example of Nephi and Laban complicates that position - or, at least, it ought to complicate it.SmallFarm wrote:There's a difference between condemning an act as sin and condemning a person committing that act. One we are commanded to do, the other we should avoid unless directly guided by God to do so.
-
log
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2077
- Location: The Fireplace of Affliction
Re: Really that manner of man ?
Let's find out.SmallFarm wrote:The example of Nephi and Laban validates my position, perhaps you have misunderstood me... Or do I misunderstand you? :-\log wrote:The example of Nephi and Laban complicates that position - or, at least, it ought to complicate it.SmallFarm wrote:There's a difference between condemning an act as sin and condemning a person committing that act. One we are commanded to do, the other we should avoid unless directly guided by God to do so.
(Que Rod Sterling impression): You're invisible, standing in a dark alleyway in ancient Jerusalem close to midnight. You watch as a drunk, armed, and armored nobleman stumbles his way down the cobblestone path, eventually falling to his face and snoring. Striding towards you is a large, muscular teenager, who turns into the alleway, pulls up short, draws the nobleman's sword, admires it for a few seconds, then stares thoughtfully at the man lying in his drink on the ground. You see the wheels of thought turning in his head, and then behold in horror as the youth pulls the drunk's head off the ground by the hair, and proceeds to relieve him of all the cares upon his shoulders (or, alternatively, "gives him the closest, and last, shave of his life").
Clearly, this was murder most foul - an act of treachery. The commandment says, "Thou shalt not kill." You have entered the Judgement Zone.
So, how do you judge that act?
- SmallFarm
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 4643
- Location: Holbrook, Az
- Contact:
Re: Really that manner of man ?
I would judge the act itself as evil but would reserve (or try to reserve) judgement of the the person committing it to God, unless called to stand in judgement against him. At least that would be my ideal I would try to hold myself to, though I would probably fail.
-
log
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 2077
- Location: The Fireplace of Affliction
Re: Really that manner of man ?
Now, perhaps one may appreciate why there is no commandment to condemn acts, nor men.
Doctrine and Covenants 121:16
16 Cursed are all those that shall lift up the heel against mine anointed, saith the Lord, and cry they have sinned when they have not sinned before me, saith the Lord, but have done that which was meet in mine eyes, and which I commanded them.
