http://www.wnd.com/1997/06/901/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;How sensational is this non-story? Yesterday, the London Telegraph, in a combined dispatch with AFP, reported that Belgian troops roasted a Somali boy. Roasted him! And what was the sentence for this peace crime committed during an operation dubbed ironically “Restore Hope”? A military court sentenced two paratroopers to a month in jail and a fine of 200 pounds.
[Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
- mes5464
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 29586
- Location: Seneca, South Carolina
[Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
-
wot
- captain of 100
- Posts: 140
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
This post is extremely misleading. The article you're referencing is from 1997. Didn't happen yesterday.
- uglypitbull
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1751
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
Not misleading at all....the title of this thread starts out with [Old But Important]...pay closer attention
- BroJones
- Level 34 Illuminated
- Posts: 8251
- Location: Varies.
- Contact:
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
Wot - you seem to be coming in making attacks on people's honesty:
Note UPB's response,wot wrote:This post is extremely misleading. The article you're referencing is from 1997. Didn't happen yesterday.
Perhaps some will hesitate to stand up to your unkind statements, wot (the above is just one example), but when we identify ad-hominem bullying tactics, we will do so!Not misleading at all....the title of this thread starts out with [Old But Important]...pay closer attention
-
wot
- captain of 100
- Posts: 140
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
[Old But Important] Bystanders to Genocide
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc ... de/304571/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc ... de/304571/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- moonwhim
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 4251
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
I would guess that the new "wot" is the old "gree"
- Fairminded
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 1956
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
That's the hypothesis I'm operating under.moonwhim wrote:I would guess that the new "wot" is the old "gree"
-
wot
- captain of 100
- Posts: 140
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
You guys seem to be missing the point. My point is very simply: what's the point? What is the point of this article from 1997. Is the UN currently in the midst of an atrocious act that we should be concerned with?
- skmo
- captain of 1,000
- Posts: 4495
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
No, that we should be aware of stories of dangerous organizations in spite of how much the mainstream media fails to point out their atrocities in the hopes that the public will forget about them.
-
MsEva
- captain of 100
- Posts: 977
Re: [Old But Important] Those U.N. peacekeeping atrocities
moonwhim wrote:I would guess that the new "wot" is the old "gree"
Yep, I was thinking the same thing after reading only ONE of his posts. :YMALIEN: :-@
