LDS Freedom Forum

......and the plot thickens. Here is a snipped from an article posted by Lynn Stuter ..

Last week I sent out an e-mail concerning the fact that the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) shows that Adam Lanza, the alleged Sandy Hook shooter, actually died on December 13, 2012, the day before Sandy Hook occurred. I outlined, step by step, how I obtained this information, so doubters could check the facts for themselves. The SSDI record shows Adam Lanza's birth date of April 22, 1992 which has been confirmed; his birth place of Exeter, New Hampshire, has also been confirmed. The same record shows Adam Lanza's date of death as December 13, 2012.

This is the day BEFORE the shooting.....hmmmm?

full article here.... http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter210.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Deleted

I am sure it was just a typo by the Social Security Administration just like Vicki Soto's RIP webpage and United Way's page for the Victim's of Sandy Hook ... NOT!

Walking in circles?
Look at this video. it looks like a bunch of extras on a movie set. How do you make 100 people look like 1500 people on a movie set? you have them walk in a circle out one door and back in another. Also Gene Rosen is spotted in the crowd...
Seriously... how is this defendable?

Here is an unedited HD version.

Things to watch for: At the beginning you will see a boy with a yellow shirt walk aimlessly around. At 4:30 you will see a man with a leather jacket start to trot as if he's got somewhere important to be, but then starts walking as he turns back around a truck, following the rest of the people back into the building.

Bombshell: Sandy Hook shooter died day before shootings

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/news/Bombshell_S ... z2JaFneZSc" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Sandy Hook - More and More Questions - Story Falling Apart

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo ... z2JaGNCVJK" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Father of 6-Yr-Old Sandy Victim Gives Powerful Testimony: "The Problem Is Not Gun Laws"

Read more: http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo ... z2JaIgfIMI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

From a report attributed by Joel Skousen to Global Research reporters from Canada:

“We spent January 21 in Newtown visiting the Sandy Hook School and Sandy Hook Volunteer Fire House, Gene Rosen's residence, the 100 Church Hill Restaurant (and pub), the Newtown Bee offices, as well as the Newtown Police Department.

“The front of the school is entirely boarded up which would be consistent with broken glass. The lettering from the front of the school ‘Sandy Hook Elementary’ is removed. The side door and other windows were not boarded up. No cameras could be seen at the front door or anywhere on the property [all are inside the school].

“We then went to the offices of The Newtown Bee, the community's weekly newspaper, where we spoke with the editor, Mr. Curtis Clark. Mr. Clark did not offer a warm reception and stated from the start that they were concentrating the paper's efforts on healing efforts and that he had little time. I told him I was there to follow up on The Bee's report that stated, in part, ‘A man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school on the day of the incident was an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town, according to the source.’ I asked who this officer was, and why he was in the woods.

“Mr. Clark told me that there was a number of ‘conspiracy theories floating around’ and ‘some of them even suggest that the shooting didn't even happen.’ Furthermore, ‘Snopes.com [a shill for the establishment] debunks many of these conspiracy theories.’

“I told Clark I was familiar with Snopes, but it was The Bee that reported that this was an off duty officer prancing about in the woods on the day of the shooting. Clark would not address this report and became very agitated with me ‘interrogating’ him. ‘I don't intend to discuss this any further with you,’ he said. Mr. Clark then referred me to the Newtown Police for any additional questions. As I was walking out of the office I overheard a lady on the phone explaining to a caller that "there is an ongoing investigation," and referring the caller to Snopes.com [obviously the Bee is in lockdown mode and refusing to answer any investigative questions—or they are hiding something. Why the refusal?].

“Next, we proceeded to the Newtown Police Department. After entering I walked up to the glassed-in safety window, picked up the phone on the wall and asked the attendant on the other side if I could speak with the Communications Officer. I explained why. He directed me to The Newtown Bee. I advised him that The Bee had directed me to them and he asked me to have a seat. A male and female police officer simultaneously entered through each door. I addressed the female sergeant, telling her I would like to know who was the off duty tactical officer The Bee reported on December 27. A male officer I was not addressing repeatedly ordered me to remove my hands from my pockets [obviously nervous about outsiders questioning the official story].

“The female sergeant told me that the man detained was the uncle of a student at the school who had gone to get his niece.” She refused to give the name so her story could be checked out. This latter response was an obvious lie. Why did he run into the woods as police approached if he was there to get his niece, dressed in camo pants? The shooting occurred between 9:30 and 10 am—way too early to pick anyone up. It shows the local police have prepared misleading answers in preparation for these kinds of informal investigations.

lundbaek wrote:From a report attributed by Joel Skousen to Global Research reporters from Canada:

“We spent January 21 in Newtown visiting the Sandy Hook School and Sandy Hook Volunteer Fire House, Gene Rosen's residence, the 100 Church Hill Restaurant (and pub), the Newtown Bee offices, as well as the Newtown Police Department.

“The front of the school is entirely boarded up which would be consistent with broken glass. The lettering from the front of the school ‘Sandy Hook Elementary’ is removed. The side door and other windows were not boarded up. No cameras could be seen at the front door or anywhere on the property [all are inside the school].

“We then went to the offices of The Newtown Bee, the community's weekly newspaper, where we spoke with the editor, Mr. Curtis Clark. Mr. Clark did not offer a warm reception and stated from the start that they were concentrating the paper's efforts on healing efforts and that he had little time. I told him I was there to follow up on The Bee's report that stated, in part, ‘A man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school on the day of the incident was an off-duty tactical squad police officer from another town, according to the source.’ I asked who this officer was, and why he was in the woods.

“Mr. Clark told me that there was a number of ‘conspiracy theories floating around’ and ‘some of them even suggest that the shooting didn't even happen.’ Furthermore, ‘Snopes.com [a shill for the establishment] debunks many of these conspiracy theories.’

“I told Clark I was familiar with Snopes, but it was The Bee that reported that this was an off duty officer prancing about in the woods on the day of the shooting. Clark would not address this report and became very agitated with me ‘interrogating’ him. ‘I don't intend to discuss this any further with you,’ he said. Mr. Clark then referred me to the Newtown Police for any additional questions. As I was walking out of the office I overheard a lady on the phone explaining to a caller that "there is an ongoing investigation," and referring the caller to Snopes.com [obviously the Bee is in lockdown mode and refusing to answer any investigative questions—or they are hiding something. Why the refusal?].

“Next, we proceeded to the Newtown Police Department. After entering I walked up to the glassed-in safety window, picked up the phone on the wall and asked the attendant on the other side if I could speak with the Communications Officer. I explained why. He directed me to The Newtown Bee. I advised him that The Bee had directed me to them and he asked me to have a seat. A male and female police officer simultaneously entered through each door. I addressed the female sergeant, telling her I would like to know who was the off duty tactical officer The Bee reported on December 27. A male officer I was not addressing repeatedly ordered me to remove my hands from my pockets [obviously nervous about outsiders questioning the official story].

“The female sergeant told me that the man detained was the uncle of a student at the school who had gone to get his niece.” She refused to give the name so her story could be checked out. This latter response was an obvious lie. Why did he run into the woods as police approached if he was there to get his niece, dressed in camo pants? The shooting occurred between 9:30 and 10 am—way too early to pick anyone up. It shows the local police have prepared misleading answers in preparation for these kinds of informal investigations.

With so many different stories, ideas, answered questions and wonder...how can most of us keep from assuming this whole thing has an odor to it in some way? Where the heck are any honest people these days? So called "official stories" means nothing anymore.

So in my new home state of Missouri a State Senator is offering an alternative approach to gun control...stronger laws for parental responsibility over firearm access.

This was too funny not to mention. What do you think our good senator means when she uses the term "parental responsibility"? I'll tell you: she means that there should be a law requiring parents of students to inform school districts if they have a gun in the house or own a firearm.

Yes, yesssss. I can see how this would make parents much more responsible for their children's safety, and make children much safer as well. It all makes so much sense!

Seriously, are they even trying to be subtle anymore? They're pushing gun registration and firearm tracking left, right, and center from every public and private sector in the name of safety. Schools ask if you have guns. Doctors ask if you have guns. You'll have to supply that information to vote, law enforcement will ask you should you run afoul of them. Next the utilities companies will require signed affidavits declaring property firearm free in order to feel comfortable sending their meter readers out, and they'll of course deliver that information to the government as good citizens.

Why is it that so many of the things the government does these days evokes a combination of X( and =)) in me?