LDS Freedom Forum

Seek the Truth wrote:I asked you first.

I asked you second.

And so I'll answer after you answer.

Seek the Truth wrote:And so I'll answer after you answer.

Cool!

So moving on my question for Ben et al is I have seen actually the explanation given for D&C 88 given in other places before, perhaps this is a bit heavy handed on everyone's part.

STT, clearly you still just like to troll and argue. Let me know if you'd like to learn some truth - just be prepared to let go of your paradigms and traditions. Right now, you would certainly fly to pieces like glass - or just keep putting up walls and arguing like a kid on the playground (see exchange with log above, among others).

One man's troll is another man's freedom fighter.

Jules wrote:STT, clearly you still just like to troll and argue. Let me know if you'd like to learn some truth - just be prepared to let go of your paradigms and traditions. Right now, you would certainly fly to pieces like glass - or just keep putting up walls and arguing like a kid on the playground (see exchange with log above, among others).

I firmly disagree, Jules. STT clearly likes to stand for principle...and forthe Gospel of Jesus Christ. I've never felt that he is here to just "argue". He is, in my opionion, a clear defender of truth.

He or she who has spent any amount of time on this forum who has not argued a point only to later change his or her position when further understanding was received, let them first cast a stone.

Should we try to reign in those who over reach in their enthusiasm for their doctrinal position? Sure. But don't condemn.