New York Bans Detectors-Plan in works?

For discussion of liberty, freedom, government and politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
SwissMrs&Pitchfire
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 6047
Location: Driven

New York Bans Detectors-Plan in works?

Post by SwissMrs&Pitchfire »

VilliageVoice
After 9/11, untold thousands of New Yorkers bought machines that detect traces of biological, chemical, and radiological weapons. But a lot of these machines didn't work right, and when they registered false alarms, the police had to spend millions of dollars chasing bad leads and throwing the public into a state of raw panic.

OK, none of that has actually happened. But Richard Falkenrath, the NYPD's deputy commissioner for counterterrorism, knows that it's just a matter of time. That's why he and Mayor Michael Bloomberg have asked the City Council to pass a law requiring anyone who wants to own such detectors to get a permit from the police first. And it's not just devices to detect weaponized anthrax that they want the power to control, but those that detect everything from industrial pollutants to asbestos in shoddy apartments. Want to test for pollution in low-income neighborhoods with high rates of childhood asthma? Gotta ask the cops for permission. Why? So you "will not lead to excessive false alarms and unwarranted anxiety," the first draft of the law states.

"There are currently no guidelines regulating the private acquisition of biological, chemical, and radiological detectors," warned Falkenrath, adding that this law was suggested by officials within the Department of Homeland Security. "There are no consistent standards for the type of detectors used, no requirement that they be reported to the police department—or anyone else, for that matter—and no mechanism for coordinating these devices. . . . Our mutual goal is to prevent false alarms . . . by making sure we know where these detectors are located, and that they conform to standards of quality and reliability."
Maybe the nuke NYC threats are credible? What don't they want people to detect?

Proud 2b Peculiar
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5560
Location: American Fork, Utah

Post by Proud 2b Peculiar »

sad

Proud 2b Peculiar
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5560
Location: American Fork, Utah

Post by Proud 2b Peculiar »

Some prophet said "That was before New York was destroyed by fire"

User avatar
mirkwood
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1740
Location: Utah

Post by mirkwood »

Actually it was Albany:

It was before Boston was swept into the sea, by the sea heaving itself beyond its bounds; it was before Albany was destroyed by fire.

Proud 2b Peculiar
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5560
Location: American Fork, Utah

Post by Proud 2b Peculiar »

Albany and New York were mentioned I thought...

D&C 84

114 Nevertheless, let the bishop go unto the city of New York, also to the city of Albany, and also to the city of Boston, and warn the people of those cities with the sound of the gospel, with a loud voice, of the desolation and utter abolishment which await them if they do reject these things.

115 For if they do reject these things the hour of their judgment is nigh, and their house shall be left unto them desolate.

User avatar
shadow
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 10542
Location: St. George

Post by shadow »

"Their great and magnificent cities are to be cut off. New York, Boston, Albany, and numerous other cities will be left desolate." Orson Pratt

I haven't found out yet how New York city will be left desolate.

User avatar
mirkwood
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1740
Location: Utah

Post by mirkwood »

It is, I just meant the fire comment was about Albany. New York goes by earthquake.


Here are some NYC quotes:

Wilford Woodruff, Deseret News, Vol. 33, p. 678, November 12, 1884.
“You are to become men and women, fathers and mothers; yea, the day will come, after your fathers, and these prophets and apostles are dead, you will have the privilege of going into the towers of a glorious Temple built unto the name of the Most High east of us upon the Logan bench; and while you stand in the towers of the Temple and your eyes survey this glorious valley filled with cities and villages, occupied by tens of thousands of Latter-day Saints, you will then call to mind this visitation of President Young and his company. You will say: ‘That was in the days when Presidents Benson and Maughan presided over us; that was before New York was destroyed by an earthquake; it was before Boston was swept into the sea, by the sea heaving itself beyond its bounds; it was before Albany was destroyed by fire; yea, at that time you will remember the scenes of this day. Treasure them up and forget them not.’
President Young followed and said: ‘What Brother Woodruff has said is revelation and will be fulfilled.’”




Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 12, p. 344, December 27, 1868.
For instance the great, powerful and populous city of New York, that may be considered one of the greatest cities of the world, will in a few years become a mass of ruins. The people will wonder while gazing on the ruins that cost hundreds of millions to build, what has become of inhabitants. Their houses will be there, but they will be left desolate.


Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 20, p. 152, March 9, 1879.
Their cities will be left desolate. A time is coming when the great and populous city of New York—the greatest city of the American Republic, will be left without inhabitants. The houses will stand, some of them, not all. They will stand there, but unoccupied, no people to inherit them.

User avatar
Army Of Truth
captain of 1,000
Posts: 1828
Location: Rivers of Babylon
Contact:

Re: New York Bans Detectors-Plan in works?

Post by Army Of Truth »

SwissMrs&Pitchfire wrote:VilliageVoice
After 9/11, untold thousands of New Yorkers bought machines that detect traces of biological, chemical, and radiological weapons. But a lot of these machines didn't work right, and when they registered false alarms, the police had to spend millions of dollars chasing bad leads and throwing the public into a state of raw panic.

OK, none of that has actually happened. But Richard Falkenrath, the NYPD's deputy commissioner for counterterrorism, knows that it's just a matter of time. That's why he and Mayor Michael Bloomberg have asked the City Council to pass a law requiring anyone who wants to own such detectors to get a permit from the police first. And it's not just devices to detect weaponized anthrax that they want the power to control, but those that detect everything from industrial pollutants to asbestos in shoddy apartments. Want to test for pollution in low-income neighborhoods with high rates of childhood asthma? Gotta ask the cops for permission. Why? So you "will not lead to excessive false alarms and unwarranted anxiety," the first draft of the law states.

"There are currently no guidelines regulating the private acquisition of biological, chemical, and radiological detectors," warned Falkenrath, adding that this law was suggested by officials within the Department of Homeland Security. "There are no consistent standards for the type of detectors used, no requirement that they be reported to the police department—or anyone else, for that matter—and no mechanism for coordinating these devices. . . . Our mutual goal is to prevent false alarms . . . by making sure we know where these detectors are located, and that they conform to standards of quality and reliability."
Maybe the nuke NYC threats are credible? What don't they want people to detect?
Unbelievable! Can you say "BIG BROTHER"?
The more corrupt the State, the more it legislates.” – Cornelius Tacitus; Ancient Roman historian, 55 A.D – 120 A.D.

The more laws, the less justice.” – Marcus Tullius Cicero

Proud 2b Peculiar
Level 34 Illuminated
Posts: 5560
Location: American Fork, Utah

Post by Proud 2b Peculiar »

Thank you.

Any possibility of ANY of those prophets and apostles mentioned still living?

(I don't know if that would include 70's or to know who was in that audience)

Post Reply